<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Laurence12799</id>
	<title>Physics Book - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Laurence12799"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Special:Contributions/Laurence12799"/>
	<updated>2026-04-10T13:36:21Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.42.7</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=39083</id>
		<title>Electric Potential</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=39083"/>
		<updated>2020-11-21T21:35:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurence12799: /* Middling */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039;, like all forms of potential energy, is the potential for work to be done, in this case by the electric force. The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; (frequently referred to as voltage, from its SI unit, the Volt) is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; associated with the test charge (1 Coulomb), such that it depends only on the source, just as the electric field is related to the electric force, but depends only on the source. One may similarly remember the parallel concept of the gravitational potential, which was gravitational potential energy divided by mass.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined with respect to the [[Electric Force]] &amp;amp; [[Electric Field]]:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} = - q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; from point b to point a&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the charge in the electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the source charge&#039;s electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a differential length along the path from point b to point a&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1150px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Derivation of Electric Potential Energy&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The differential work &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(dW)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; associated with an external force &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{F}_{ext})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moving a charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; from point b to point a &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(d\mathbf{L})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; through an electric field &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{E})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;dW = \mathbf{F}_{ext} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is the vector multiplication of the force moving the charge and the distance the object has moved.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The external force must be equal and opposite to the force associated with the source charge&#039;s electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{F}_{ext} &amp;amp;= - \mathbf{F}_{E} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= - q \mathbf{E}&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;dW = - q \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Integrating from point b to point a along the path gives:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W = -q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, since the work was defined externally, the calculated work is equal to the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} =  -q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricPotentialPaths.png|400px|right|thumb|Some sets of electrically equivalent paths for a charge.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From this, the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; per test charge in the source charge&#039;s electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{U_{ab}}{q} = - \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The electric field is a &#039;&#039;conservative vector field&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:::This means that any path used in the above line integral will give the same value for the same beginning and end points (b and a). Looking at the figure to the right, many paths for a charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; subject to the electric field of source charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are shown. In each set of four paths (Green, Blue, Yellow, and Pink), the same amount of &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is gained or lost. &lt;br /&gt;
*A special case shown in dark green near the bottom right of the figure also exists:&lt;br /&gt;
:::If a charge is moving along a path that is always perpendicular to the electric field, the line integral will evaluate to zero, and therefore the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; will also evaluate to zero.&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is easily shown with the dot product; if two variable vectors are always perpendicular, then their dot product is always zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricPotentialRadial.png|400px|right|thumb|Illustration of radial potential.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; from a source charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(Q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be written in a simpler expression:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr ( \frac{1}{r_{a}} - \frac{1}{r_{b}} \biggr )&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the source charge&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{a}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the final position &lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{b}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the initial position&lt;br /&gt;
:*The initial position is often taken to be infinity (the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined to be zero at infinity) creating a simpler and more familiar looking equation:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} r}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
:::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the distance between the source charge and the charge in the electric field&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is used to described the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; gained or lost when moving a charge radially closer to a source charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:740px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Derivation of Radial Potential&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If a charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is being moved in a source charge&#039;s &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(Q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; electric field &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{E})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; is:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} = - q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric field is known to be described radially as: ([[Electric Field]])&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{Q}{r^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Allow the path be along the radial direction:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d\mathbf{L} = dr \hat{\mathbf{r}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging these in gives:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
U_{ab} &amp;amp;= -q \int_{b}^{a} \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{Q}{r^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}} \cdot \hat{\mathbf{r}} dr \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= -q \int_{b}^{a} \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{Q}{r^2} dr \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= - \frac{qQ}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \int_{b}^{a} \frac{dr}{r^2} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= \frac{qQ}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr [ \frac{1}{r} \biggr ]_{b}^{a} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;=  \frac{qQ}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr ( \frac{1}{r_{a}} - \frac{1}{r_{b}} \biggr ) \\&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore, the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr ( \frac{1}{r_{a}} - \frac{1}{r_{b}} \biggr )&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Critical Formulas&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} = - q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{U_{ab}}{q}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} r}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
Click on the link to see &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; through VPython! Make sure to press &amp;quot;Run&amp;quot; to see the principle in action!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[https://trinket.io/embed/glowscript/0a7e486c94 Teach hand-on with GlowScript]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Watch this video for a more visual approach! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Rb9guSEeVE Electric Potential: Visualizing Voltage with 3D animations]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
A parallel plate capacitor is shown below:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricPotentialSimpleExample.png|400px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each plate has area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; with positive charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; on the left plate and negative charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;-Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; on the right plate. The distance between the plates is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Question 1&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&#039;&#039;&#039;a.) Which direction is the electric field between the plates pointed? How do you know?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution 1&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electric fields always point from positive to negative charge. Therefore, the electric field between the plates will point in the positive &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;-direction, straight from the left plate to the right plate since the distribution of positive and negative charge is flat and symmetric. The electric field will bend near the edges (called fringing fields). These are usually neglected if &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is much smaller than the length of the plates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Question 2&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&#039;&#039;&#039;b.) If the negative charge shown to be located near the negatively charged plate moved towards the positively charged plate, how would the electric potential and electric potential energy of the negative charge change?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution 2&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We start with noting that the charge (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_n=-\alpha q, \alpha &amp;gt; 0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) in question is a negative charge. This effectively means all analysis will be reversed i.e. if the electric potential energy was increasing for a positive charge, it would be decreasing for a negative charge. With that said, we can start by noticing that the charge is moving against the electric field between the plates. Since this a negative charge, this is the way that negative charge &#039;&#039;wants&#039;&#039; to move, meaning it is losing electric potential energy and gaining kinetic energy. This can be seen mathematically by the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} = -q \int_b^a \mathbf{E} \cdot d \mathbf{L} =  - (q_n) (-E_o) \Delta L = (-\alpha q)E_o \Delta L = -\alpha q E_o \Delta L&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (since the electric field is approximately constant between the plates &amp;amp; the electric field and path are aligned)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We can readily see that moving from position &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; to position &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (a distance of length &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta L&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) causes a decrease in electric potential energy since this is a negative charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now dividing &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; by &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; gives &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{U_{ab}}{q_n} = \frac{U_{ab}}{-\alpha q} = E_o \Delta L&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore the electric potential is increasing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Question 3&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&#039;&#039;&#039;c.) Redo part (b.) for a positive charge.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution 3&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We can reverse our answer from b. but keep in mind electric potential is &#039;&#039;per unit test charge&#039;&#039;...essentially it is charge independent. Therefore, the electric potential energy of the positive charge would be increasing (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\alpha q E_o \Delta L&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;), and the electric potential would still be increasing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
A positive charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_o&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; travels through a spatially uniform electric field from Point &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; to Point &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;B&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; to Point &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, was depicted in the figure below. The coordinates of the points and magnitude of the electric field are defined in the figure.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricPotentialMiddlingExample.png|800px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Question 1&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&#039;&#039;&#039;a.) When the charge moves from Point &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; to Point &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;B&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, what is the change in electric potential?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution 1&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{AB} = - \int_B^A \mathbf{E} \cdot d \mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this case, the electric field is a constant &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(E_o, 0)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and the path is a straight line with components:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta  \mathbf{L} = A-B = (0, 0) - (6, -3) = (-6, 3)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our expression for the change in electric potential simplifies to:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{AB} = -\mathbf{E} \cdot \Delta \mathbf{L} = -(E_o, 0) \cdot (-6, +3) = 6E_o = 6E_o = 300 \ \mathrm{V}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Question 2&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&#039;&#039;&#039;b.) When the charge moves from Point &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;B&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; to Point &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, what is the change in electric potential?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution 2&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The process is exactly the same as part a:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{BC} = -\int_C^B \mathbf{E} \cdot \Delta \mathbf{L} = - (E_o, 0) \cdot (1, -4) = -E_o = -50 \ \mathrm{V}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Question 3&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&#039;&#039;&#039;c.) If instead of moving from Point &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; to Point &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;B&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; to Point &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, the charge moved from Point &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; directly to Point &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, what would the change in electric potential be? How is this electric potential difference related to the two previously calculated electrical potential differences? What feature of an electric filed is this illustrating?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution 3&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We repeat the same process again:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{AC} = -\int_C^A \mathbf{E} \cdot \Delta \mathbf{L} = - (E_o, 0) \cdot (-5, 1) = 5E_o = 250 \ \mathrm{V}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The three calculated electric potential differences are related by:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{AC} = V_{AB} + V_{BC} = 250 \ \mathrm{V}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This illustrates the path independence of the potential difference, and thus the conservative nature of the electric field.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
===Externals links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Main Idea ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Calculate the change in electric potential between point A, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(-4, 3,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and B, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(2,-2,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; . The electric field in the location is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; (50,0,0) \; N/C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:EP mid fig.png ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer: -300V&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta\vec{l}= (2,-2,0)\;m - (-4,3,0)\;m = (6,-5,0)\;m &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -({E}_{x}∆{x} + {E}_{y}∆{y} + {E}_{z}∆{z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -(50\; N/C \cdot 6 \;m + 0 \; N/c \cdot -5 \; m + 0\cdot 0)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -300 V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Bohr Model]] of the hydrogen atom treats it as a nucleus of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; +e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; electrons of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; orbiting in circular orbits of specific radii. Calculate the potential difference between two points, one infinitely far away from the nucleus, and the other one Bohr radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; away from the nucleus (don&#039;t worry about substituting in the values). Compute the electric potential energy associated with the electron one Bohr radius away from the nucleus, setting the potential energy at infinity as zero (remember the sign of the charge). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We may compute the electric potential by taking integrating the electric field of a point charge as the radius goes from infinity to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. This integral may be set up as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\int_\infty^{a_0} \vec{E}\cdot\text{d}\vec{l} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \int_\infty^{a_0} \frac{\text{d} r}{r^2} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This may then be solved:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\biggr{(}\frac{1}{r}\biggr{|}_\infty^{a_0} = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
to compute the potential energy, we now multiply by the charge of the electron: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, giving &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -\frac{e^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Depending on what physics or chemistry courses you may have taken before, this may be recognizable as twice the ionization energy of the n=1 orbital. The factor of two is due to the fact that in the Bohr model, the kinetic energy will be exactly half of this potential energy, and will be positive so that the net result is still negative, but with half the magnitude. This understanding of the hydrogen atom gets certain values right, but the reality of the situation is far more complicated. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is this topic connected to something that you are interested in?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am interested in robotic systems and building circuit boards and electrical systems for manufacturing robots. While studying this section in the book, I was able to connect back many of the concepts and calculations back to robotics and the electrical component of automated systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Since high school, I never really understood how to work with the voltmeter and what it measured, and I have always wanted to know, but although this particular wiki page did not go into the details and other branches of electric potential, it led me to find the answers to something I was interested in since high school, the concept of electric potential.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I think electively is really interesting. When I was younger, I participated in this demo where a group of people hold hands and someone touches this special ball full of charge. We all could feel the tingling sensation of the current passing through us. It’s cool to learn the theory behind the supposed magic that occurs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I think it&#039;s very interesting that electric potential can be seen as a property of a space and that we can have further applications using this property.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is it connected to your major?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am a Mechanical Engineering major, so I will be dealing with the electrical components of machines when I work. Therefore, I have to know these certain concepts such as electric potential in order to fully understand how they work and interact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revistionist] As a biochemistry major, electric potential and electric potential difference is not particularly related to my major, but in chemistry classes, we use electrostatic potential maps (electrostatic potential energy maps) that shows the charge distributions throughout a molecule. Although the main use in electric potential is different in physics and biochemistry (where physicists use it identify the effect of the electric field at a location), I still found it interesting as the concept of electric potential (buildup) was being used in quite a different way. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I am a computer science major. Although I deal mostly with software, the hardware aspect is still important. The algorithms that I design run differently on different machines. The time complexity of an algorithm is sometimes useless when worrying about constant factors that are determined by a system’s hardware. Quicksort, for instance, is usually faster than many other sorts that have lower time complexities. The hardware of computers heavily relies on electricity and current (which is induced by a potential difference) to switch transistors on and off and thereby process information. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I am an aerospace engineering major, and I think understanding such concepts will help me have a better holistic understanding towards fields and systems. In addition, the thinking behind solving related problems will help me better prepared for future classes that involve with solving dynamics problems. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Is there an interesting industrial application?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] Electrical potential is used to find the voltage across a path. This is useful when working with circuit components and attempting to manipulate the power output or current throughout a component.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Electric potential sensors are being used to detect a variety of electrical signals made by the human body, thus contributing to the field of electrophysiology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] The study of electric potential has lead scientists to generate very safe wires that will not overheat and cause fires. Connecting circuits to ground is important and the third prong in an electrical outlet is this ground connection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The idea of electric potential, in a way, started with Ben Franklin and his experiments in the 1740s. He began to understand the flow of electricity, which eventually paved the path towards explaining electric potential and potential difference. Scientists finally began to understand how electric fields were actually affecting the charges and the surrounding environment. Benjamin Franklin first shocked himself in 1746, while conducting experiments on electricity with found objects from around his house. Six years later, or 261 years ago for us, the founding father flew a kite attached to a key and a silk ribbon in a thunderstorm and effectively trapped lightning in a jar. The experiment is now seen as a watershed moment in mankind&#039;s venture to channel a force of nature that was viewed quite abstractly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the time Franklin started experimenting with electricity, he&#039;d already found fame and fortune as the author of Poor Richard&#039;s Almanack. Electricity wasn&#039;t a very well understood phenomenon at that point, so Franklin&#039;s research proved to be fairly foundational. The early experiments, experts believe, were inspired by other scientists&#039; work and the shortcomings therein.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ep135.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
source: http://www.benjamin-franklin-history.org/kite-experiment/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That early brush with the dangers of electricity left an impression on Franklin. He described the sensation as &amp;quot;a universal blow throughout my whole body from head to foot, which seemed within as well as without; after which the first thing I took notice of was a violent quick shaking of my body.&amp;quot; However, it didn&#039;t scare him away. In the handful of years before his famous kite experiment, Franklin contributed everything from designing the first battery designs to establishing some common nomenclature in the study of electricity. Although Franklin is often coined the father of electricity, after he set the foundations of electricity, many other scientists contributed his or her research in the advancement of electricity and eventually led to the discovery of electric potential and potential difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like mentioned multiple times throughout the page, although electric potential is a huge and important topic, it has many branches, which makes the concept of electric potential difficult to stand alone. Even with this page, to support the concept of electric potential, many crucial branches of the topic appeared, like potential difference (which also branched into [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_Path_Independence,_claimed_by_Aditya_Mohile Potential Difference Path Independence]], [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_in_a_Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Uniform Field]], and [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_of_Point_Charge_in_a_Non-Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Nonuniform Field]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External Links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] https://www.khanacademy.org/test-prep/mcat/physical-processes/electrostatics-1/v/electric-potential-at-a-point-in-space&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pcWz4tP_zUw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vpa_uApmNoo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] https://www.khanacademy.org/science/electrical-engineering/ee-electrostatics/ee-fields-potential-voltage/a/ee-electric-potential-voltage&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] &amp;quot;Benjamin Franklin and Electricity.&amp;quot; Benjamin Franklin and Electricity. N.p., n.d. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.americaslibrary.gov/aa/franklinb/aa_franklinb_electric_1.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Bottyan, Thomas. &amp;quot;Electrostatic Potential Maps.&amp;quot; Chemwiki. N.p., 02 Oct. 2013. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://chemwiki.ucdavis.edu/Core/Theoretical_Chemistry/Chemical_Bonding/General_Principles_of_Chemical_Bonding/Electrostatic_Potential_maps&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] &amp;quot;Electric Potential Difference.&amp;quot; Electric Potential Difference. The Physics Classroom, n.d. Web. 14 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/circuits/Lesson-1/Electric-Potential-Difference&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] Harland, C. J., T. D. Clark, and R. J. Prance. &amp;quot;Applications of Electric Potential (Displacement Current) Sensors in Human Body Electrophysiology.&amp;quot; International Society for Industrial Process Tomography, n.d. Web. 16 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.isipt.org/world-congress/3/269.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] Sherwood, Bruce A. &amp;quot;2.1 The Momentum Principle.&amp;quot; Matter &amp;amp; Interactions. By Ruth W. Chabay. 4th ed. Vol. 1. N.p.: John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons, 2015. 45-50. Print. Modern Mechanics.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurence12799</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=39081</id>
		<title>Electric Potential</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=39081"/>
		<updated>2020-11-21T21:30:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurence12799: /* Middling */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039;, like all forms of potential energy, is the potential for work to be done, in this case by the electric force. The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; (frequently referred to as voltage, from its SI unit, the Volt) is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; associated with the test charge (1 Coulomb), such that it depends only on the source, just as the electric field is related to the electric force, but depends only on the source. One may similarly remember the parallel concept of the gravitational potential, which was gravitational potential energy divided by mass.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined with respect to the [[Electric Force]] &amp;amp; [[Electric Field]]:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} = - q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; from point b to point a&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the charge in the electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the source charge&#039;s electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a differential length along the path from point b to point a&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1150px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Derivation of Electric Potential Energy&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The differential work &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(dW)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; associated with an external force &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{F}_{ext})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moving a charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; from point b to point a &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(d\mathbf{L})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; through an electric field &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{E})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;dW = \mathbf{F}_{ext} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is the vector multiplication of the force moving the charge and the distance the object has moved.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The external force must be equal and opposite to the force associated with the source charge&#039;s electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{F}_{ext} &amp;amp;= - \mathbf{F}_{E} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= - q \mathbf{E}&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;dW = - q \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Integrating from point b to point a along the path gives:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W = -q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, since the work was defined externally, the calculated work is equal to the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} =  -q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricPotentialPaths.png|400px|right|thumb|Some sets of electrically equivalent paths for a charge.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From this, the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; per test charge in the source charge&#039;s electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{U_{ab}}{q} = - \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The electric field is a &#039;&#039;conservative vector field&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:::This means that any path used in the above line integral will give the same value for the same beginning and end points (b and a). Looking at the figure to the right, many paths for a charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; subject to the electric field of source charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are shown. In each set of four paths (Green, Blue, Yellow, and Pink), the same amount of &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is gained or lost. &lt;br /&gt;
*A special case shown in dark green near the bottom right of the figure also exists:&lt;br /&gt;
:::If a charge is moving along a path that is always perpendicular to the electric field, the line integral will evaluate to zero, and therefore the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; will also evaluate to zero.&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is easily shown with the dot product; if two variable vectors are always perpendicular, then their dot product is always zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricPotentialRadial.png|400px|right|thumb|Illustration of radial potential.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; from a source charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(Q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be written in a simpler expression:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr ( \frac{1}{r_{a}} - \frac{1}{r_{b}} \biggr )&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the source charge&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{a}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the final position &lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{b}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the initial position&lt;br /&gt;
:*The initial position is often taken to be infinity (the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined to be zero at infinity) creating a simpler and more familiar looking equation:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} r}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
:::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the distance between the source charge and the charge in the electric field&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is used to described the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; gained or lost when moving a charge radially closer to a source charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:740px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Derivation of Radial Potential&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If a charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is being moved in a source charge&#039;s &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(Q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; electric field &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{E})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; is:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} = - q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric field is known to be described radially as: ([[Electric Field]])&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{Q}{r^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Allow the path be along the radial direction:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d\mathbf{L} = dr \hat{\mathbf{r}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging these in gives:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
U_{ab} &amp;amp;= -q \int_{b}^{a} \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{Q}{r^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}} \cdot \hat{\mathbf{r}} dr \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= -q \int_{b}^{a} \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{Q}{r^2} dr \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= - \frac{qQ}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \int_{b}^{a} \frac{dr}{r^2} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= \frac{qQ}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr [ \frac{1}{r} \biggr ]_{b}^{a} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;=  \frac{qQ}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr ( \frac{1}{r_{a}} - \frac{1}{r_{b}} \biggr ) \\&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore, the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr ( \frac{1}{r_{a}} - \frac{1}{r_{b}} \biggr )&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Critical Formulas&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} = - q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{U_{ab}}{q}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} r}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
Click on the link to see &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; through VPython! Make sure to press &amp;quot;Run&amp;quot; to see the principle in action!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[https://trinket.io/embed/glowscript/0a7e486c94 Teach hand-on with GlowScript]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Watch this video for a more visual approach! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Rb9guSEeVE Electric Potential: Visualizing Voltage with 3D animations]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
A parallel plate capacitor is shown below:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricPotentialSimpleExample.png|400px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each plate has area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; with positive charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; on the left plate and negative charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;-Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; on the right plate. The distance between the plates is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Question 1&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&#039;&#039;&#039;a.) Which direction is the electric field between the plates pointed? How do you know?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution 1&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electric fields always point from positive to negative charge. Therefore, the electric field between the plates will point in the positive &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;-direction, straight from the left plate to the right plate since the distribution of positive and negative charge is flat and symmetric. The electric field will bend near the edges (called fringing fields). These are usually neglected if &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is much smaller than the length of the plates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Question 2&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&#039;&#039;&#039;b.) If the negative charge shown to be located near the negatively charged plate moved towards the positively charged plate, how would the electric potential and electric potential energy of the negative charge change?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution 2&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We start with noting that the charge (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_n=-\alpha q, \alpha &amp;gt; 0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) in question is a negative charge. This effectively means all analysis will be reversed i.e. if the electric potential energy was increasing for a positive charge, it would be decreasing for a negative charge. With that said, we can start by noticing that the charge is moving against the electric field between the plates. Since this a negative charge, this is the way that negative charge &#039;&#039;wants&#039;&#039; to move, meaning it is losing electric potential energy and gaining kinetic energy. This can be seen mathematically by the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} = -q \int_b^a \mathbf{E} \cdot d \mathbf{L} =  - (q_n) (-E_o) \Delta L = (-\alpha q)E_o \Delta L = -\alpha q E_o \Delta L&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (since the electric field is approximately constant between the plates &amp;amp; the electric field and path are aligned)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We can readily see that moving from position &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; to position &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (a distance of length &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta L&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) causes a decrease in electric potential energy since this is a negative charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now dividing &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; by &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; gives &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{U_{ab}}{q_n} = \frac{U_{ab}}{-\alpha q} = E_o \Delta L&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore the electric potential is increasing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Question 3&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&#039;&#039;&#039;c.) Redo part (b.) for a positive charge.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution 3&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We can reverse our answer from b. but keep in mind electric potential is &#039;&#039;per unit test charge&#039;&#039;...essentially it is charge independent. Therefore, the electric potential energy of the positive charge would be increasing (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\alpha q E_o \Delta L&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;), and the electric potential would still be increasing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
A positive charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_o&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; travels through a spatially uniform electric field from Point &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; to Point &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;B&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; to Point &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, was depicted in the figure below. The coordinates of the points and magnitude of the electric field are defined in the figure.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricPotentialMiddlingExample.png|800px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Question 1&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&#039;&#039;&#039;a.) When the charge moves from Point &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; to Point &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;B&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, what is the change in electric potential?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution 1&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{AB} = - \int_B^A \mathbf{E} \cdot d \mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this case, the electric field is a constant &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(E_o, 0)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and the path is a straight line with components:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta  \mathbf{L} = A-B = (0, 0) - (6, -3) = (-6, 3)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our expression for the change in electric potential simplifies to:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{AB} = -\mathbf{E} \cdot \Delta \mathbf{L} = -(E_o, 0) \cdot (-6, +3) = 6E_o = 6E_o = 300 \ \mathrm{V}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Question 2&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&#039;&#039;&#039;b.) When the charge moves from Point &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;B&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; to Point &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, what is the change in electric potential?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution 2&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The process is exactly the same as part a:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{BC} = -\int_C^B \mathbf{E} \cdot \Delta \mathbf{L} = - (E_o, 0) \cdot (1, -4) = -E_o = -50 \ \mathrm{V}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Question 3&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&#039;&#039;&#039;c.) If instead of moving from Point &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; to Point &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;B&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; to Point &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, the charge moved from Point &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; directly to Point &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, what would the change in electric potential be?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution 3&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We repeat the same process again:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{AC} = -\int_C^A \mathbf{E} \cdot \Delta \mathbf{L} = - (E_o, 0) \cdot (-5, 1) = 5E_o = 250 \ \mathrm{V}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
===Externals links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Main Idea ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Calculate the change in electric potential between point A, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(-4, 3,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and B, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(2,-2,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; . The electric field in the location is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; (50,0,0) \; N/C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:EP mid fig.png ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer: -300V&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta\vec{l}= (2,-2,0)\;m - (-4,3,0)\;m = (6,-5,0)\;m &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -({E}_{x}∆{x} + {E}_{y}∆{y} + {E}_{z}∆{z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -(50\; N/C \cdot 6 \;m + 0 \; N/c \cdot -5 \; m + 0\cdot 0)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -300 V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Bohr Model]] of the hydrogen atom treats it as a nucleus of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; +e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; electrons of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; orbiting in circular orbits of specific radii. Calculate the potential difference between two points, one infinitely far away from the nucleus, and the other one Bohr radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; away from the nucleus (don&#039;t worry about substituting in the values). Compute the electric potential energy associated with the electron one Bohr radius away from the nucleus, setting the potential energy at infinity as zero (remember the sign of the charge). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We may compute the electric potential by taking integrating the electric field of a point charge as the radius goes from infinity to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. This integral may be set up as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\int_\infty^{a_0} \vec{E}\cdot\text{d}\vec{l} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \int_\infty^{a_0} \frac{\text{d} r}{r^2} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This may then be solved:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\biggr{(}\frac{1}{r}\biggr{|}_\infty^{a_0} = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
to compute the potential energy, we now multiply by the charge of the electron: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, giving &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -\frac{e^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Depending on what physics or chemistry courses you may have taken before, this may be recognizable as twice the ionization energy of the n=1 orbital. The factor of two is due to the fact that in the Bohr model, the kinetic energy will be exactly half of this potential energy, and will be positive so that the net result is still negative, but with half the magnitude. This understanding of the hydrogen atom gets certain values right, but the reality of the situation is far more complicated. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is this topic connected to something that you are interested in?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am interested in robotic systems and building circuit boards and electrical systems for manufacturing robots. While studying this section in the book, I was able to connect back many of the concepts and calculations back to robotics and the electrical component of automated systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Since high school, I never really understood how to work with the voltmeter and what it measured, and I have always wanted to know, but although this particular wiki page did not go into the details and other branches of electric potential, it led me to find the answers to something I was interested in since high school, the concept of electric potential.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I think electively is really interesting. When I was younger, I participated in this demo where a group of people hold hands and someone touches this special ball full of charge. We all could feel the tingling sensation of the current passing through us. It’s cool to learn the theory behind the supposed magic that occurs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I think it&#039;s very interesting that electric potential can be seen as a property of a space and that we can have further applications using this property.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is it connected to your major?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am a Mechanical Engineering major, so I will be dealing with the electrical components of machines when I work. Therefore, I have to know these certain concepts such as electric potential in order to fully understand how they work and interact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revistionist] As a biochemistry major, electric potential and electric potential difference is not particularly related to my major, but in chemistry classes, we use electrostatic potential maps (electrostatic potential energy maps) that shows the charge distributions throughout a molecule. Although the main use in electric potential is different in physics and biochemistry (where physicists use it identify the effect of the electric field at a location), I still found it interesting as the concept of electric potential (buildup) was being used in quite a different way. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I am a computer science major. Although I deal mostly with software, the hardware aspect is still important. The algorithms that I design run differently on different machines. The time complexity of an algorithm is sometimes useless when worrying about constant factors that are determined by a system’s hardware. Quicksort, for instance, is usually faster than many other sorts that have lower time complexities. The hardware of computers heavily relies on electricity and current (which is induced by a potential difference) to switch transistors on and off and thereby process information. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I am an aerospace engineering major, and I think understanding such concepts will help me have a better holistic understanding towards fields and systems. In addition, the thinking behind solving related problems will help me better prepared for future classes that involve with solving dynamics problems. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Is there an interesting industrial application?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] Electrical potential is used to find the voltage across a path. This is useful when working with circuit components and attempting to manipulate the power output or current throughout a component.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Electric potential sensors are being used to detect a variety of electrical signals made by the human body, thus contributing to the field of electrophysiology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] The study of electric potential has lead scientists to generate very safe wires that will not overheat and cause fires. Connecting circuits to ground is important and the third prong in an electrical outlet is this ground connection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The idea of electric potential, in a way, started with Ben Franklin and his experiments in the 1740s. He began to understand the flow of electricity, which eventually paved the path towards explaining electric potential and potential difference. Scientists finally began to understand how electric fields were actually affecting the charges and the surrounding environment. Benjamin Franklin first shocked himself in 1746, while conducting experiments on electricity with found objects from around his house. Six years later, or 261 years ago for us, the founding father flew a kite attached to a key and a silk ribbon in a thunderstorm and effectively trapped lightning in a jar. The experiment is now seen as a watershed moment in mankind&#039;s venture to channel a force of nature that was viewed quite abstractly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the time Franklin started experimenting with electricity, he&#039;d already found fame and fortune as the author of Poor Richard&#039;s Almanack. Electricity wasn&#039;t a very well understood phenomenon at that point, so Franklin&#039;s research proved to be fairly foundational. The early experiments, experts believe, were inspired by other scientists&#039; work and the shortcomings therein.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ep135.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
source: http://www.benjamin-franklin-history.org/kite-experiment/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That early brush with the dangers of electricity left an impression on Franklin. He described the sensation as &amp;quot;a universal blow throughout my whole body from head to foot, which seemed within as well as without; after which the first thing I took notice of was a violent quick shaking of my body.&amp;quot; However, it didn&#039;t scare him away. In the handful of years before his famous kite experiment, Franklin contributed everything from designing the first battery designs to establishing some common nomenclature in the study of electricity. Although Franklin is often coined the father of electricity, after he set the foundations of electricity, many other scientists contributed his or her research in the advancement of electricity and eventually led to the discovery of electric potential and potential difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like mentioned multiple times throughout the page, although electric potential is a huge and important topic, it has many branches, which makes the concept of electric potential difficult to stand alone. Even with this page, to support the concept of electric potential, many crucial branches of the topic appeared, like potential difference (which also branched into [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_Path_Independence,_claimed_by_Aditya_Mohile Potential Difference Path Independence]], [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_in_a_Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Uniform Field]], and [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_of_Point_Charge_in_a_Non-Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Nonuniform Field]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External Links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] https://www.khanacademy.org/test-prep/mcat/physical-processes/electrostatics-1/v/electric-potential-at-a-point-in-space&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pcWz4tP_zUw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vpa_uApmNoo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] https://www.khanacademy.org/science/electrical-engineering/ee-electrostatics/ee-fields-potential-voltage/a/ee-electric-potential-voltage&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] &amp;quot;Benjamin Franklin and Electricity.&amp;quot; Benjamin Franklin and Electricity. N.p., n.d. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.americaslibrary.gov/aa/franklinb/aa_franklinb_electric_1.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Bottyan, Thomas. &amp;quot;Electrostatic Potential Maps.&amp;quot; Chemwiki. N.p., 02 Oct. 2013. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://chemwiki.ucdavis.edu/Core/Theoretical_Chemistry/Chemical_Bonding/General_Principles_of_Chemical_Bonding/Electrostatic_Potential_maps&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] &amp;quot;Electric Potential Difference.&amp;quot; Electric Potential Difference. The Physics Classroom, n.d. Web. 14 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/circuits/Lesson-1/Electric-Potential-Difference&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] Harland, C. J., T. D. Clark, and R. J. Prance. &amp;quot;Applications of Electric Potential (Displacement Current) Sensors in Human Body Electrophysiology.&amp;quot; International Society for Industrial Process Tomography, n.d. Web. 16 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.isipt.org/world-congress/3/269.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] Sherwood, Bruce A. &amp;quot;2.1 The Momentum Principle.&amp;quot; Matter &amp;amp; Interactions. By Ruth W. Chabay. 4th ed. Vol. 1. N.p.: John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons, 2015. 45-50. Print. Modern Mechanics.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurence12799</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=39080</id>
		<title>Electric Potential</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=39080"/>
		<updated>2020-11-21T21:17:56Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurence12799: /* Examples */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039;, like all forms of potential energy, is the potential for work to be done, in this case by the electric force. The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; (frequently referred to as voltage, from its SI unit, the Volt) is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; associated with the test charge (1 Coulomb), such that it depends only on the source, just as the electric field is related to the electric force, but depends only on the source. One may similarly remember the parallel concept of the gravitational potential, which was gravitational potential energy divided by mass.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined with respect to the [[Electric Force]] &amp;amp; [[Electric Field]]:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} = - q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; from point b to point a&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the charge in the electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the source charge&#039;s electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a differential length along the path from point b to point a&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1150px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Derivation of Electric Potential Energy&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The differential work &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(dW)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; associated with an external force &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{F}_{ext})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moving a charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; from point b to point a &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(d\mathbf{L})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; through an electric field &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{E})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;dW = \mathbf{F}_{ext} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is the vector multiplication of the force moving the charge and the distance the object has moved.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The external force must be equal and opposite to the force associated with the source charge&#039;s electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{F}_{ext} &amp;amp;= - \mathbf{F}_{E} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= - q \mathbf{E}&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;dW = - q \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Integrating from point b to point a along the path gives:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W = -q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, since the work was defined externally, the calculated work is equal to the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} =  -q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricPotentialPaths.png|400px|right|thumb|Some sets of electrically equivalent paths for a charge.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From this, the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; per test charge in the source charge&#039;s electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{U_{ab}}{q} = - \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The electric field is a &#039;&#039;conservative vector field&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:::This means that any path used in the above line integral will give the same value for the same beginning and end points (b and a). Looking at the figure to the right, many paths for a charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; subject to the electric field of source charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are shown. In each set of four paths (Green, Blue, Yellow, and Pink), the same amount of &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is gained or lost. &lt;br /&gt;
*A special case shown in dark green near the bottom right of the figure also exists:&lt;br /&gt;
:::If a charge is moving along a path that is always perpendicular to the electric field, the line integral will evaluate to zero, and therefore the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; will also evaluate to zero.&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is easily shown with the dot product; if two variable vectors are always perpendicular, then their dot product is always zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricPotentialRadial.png|400px|right|thumb|Illustration of radial potential.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; from a source charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(Q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be written in a simpler expression:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr ( \frac{1}{r_{a}} - \frac{1}{r_{b}} \biggr )&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the source charge&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{a}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the final position &lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{b}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the initial position&lt;br /&gt;
:*The initial position is often taken to be infinity (the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined to be zero at infinity) creating a simpler and more familiar looking equation:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} r}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
:::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the distance between the source charge and the charge in the electric field&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is used to described the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; gained or lost when moving a charge radially closer to a source charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:740px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Derivation of Radial Potential&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If a charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is being moved in a source charge&#039;s &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(Q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; electric field &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{E})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; is:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} = - q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric field is known to be described radially as: ([[Electric Field]])&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{Q}{r^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Allow the path be along the radial direction:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d\mathbf{L} = dr \hat{\mathbf{r}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging these in gives:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
U_{ab} &amp;amp;= -q \int_{b}^{a} \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{Q}{r^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}} \cdot \hat{\mathbf{r}} dr \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= -q \int_{b}^{a} \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{Q}{r^2} dr \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= - \frac{qQ}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \int_{b}^{a} \frac{dr}{r^2} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= \frac{qQ}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr [ \frac{1}{r} \biggr ]_{b}^{a} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;=  \frac{qQ}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr ( \frac{1}{r_{a}} - \frac{1}{r_{b}} \biggr ) \\&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore, the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr ( \frac{1}{r_{a}} - \frac{1}{r_{b}} \biggr )&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Critical Formulas&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} = - q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{U_{ab}}{q}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} r}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
Click on the link to see &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; through VPython! Make sure to press &amp;quot;Run&amp;quot; to see the principle in action!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[https://trinket.io/embed/glowscript/0a7e486c94 Teach hand-on with GlowScript]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Watch this video for a more visual approach! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Rb9guSEeVE Electric Potential: Visualizing Voltage with 3D animations]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
A parallel plate capacitor is shown below:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricPotentialSimpleExample.png|400px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each plate has area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; with positive charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; on the left plate and negative charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;-Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; on the right plate. The distance between the plates is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Question 1&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&#039;&#039;&#039;a.) Which direction is the electric field between the plates pointed? How do you know?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution 1&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electric fields always point from positive to negative charge. Therefore, the electric field between the plates will point in the positive &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;-direction, straight from the left plate to the right plate since the distribution of positive and negative charge is flat and symmetric. The electric field will bend near the edges (called fringing fields). These are usually neglected if &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is much smaller than the length of the plates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Question 2&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&#039;&#039;&#039;b.) If the negative charge shown to be located near the negatively charged plate moved towards the positively charged plate, how would the electric potential and electric potential energy of the negative charge change?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution 2&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We start with noting that the charge (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_n=-\alpha q, \alpha &amp;gt; 0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) in question is a negative charge. This effectively means all analysis will be reversed i.e. if the electric potential energy was increasing for a positive charge, it would be decreasing for a negative charge. With that said, we can start by noticing that the charge is moving against the electric field between the plates. Since this a negative charge, this is the way that negative charge &#039;&#039;wants&#039;&#039; to move, meaning it is losing electric potential energy and gaining kinetic energy. This can be seen mathematically by the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} = -q \int_b^a \mathbf{E} \cdot d \mathbf{L} =  - (q_n) (-E_o) \Delta L = (-\alpha q)E_o \Delta L = -\alpha q E_o \Delta L&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (since the electric field is approximately constant between the plates &amp;amp; the electric field and path are aligned)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We can readily see that moving from position &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; to position &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (a distance of length &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta L&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) causes a decrease in electric potential energy since this is a negative charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now dividing &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; by &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; gives &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{U_{ab}}{q_n} = \frac{U_{ab}}{-\alpha q} = E_o \Delta L&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore the electric potential is increasing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Question 3&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&#039;&#039;&#039;c.) Redo part (b.) for a positive charge.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution 3&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We can reverse our answer from b. but keep in mind electric potential is &#039;&#039;per unit test charge&#039;&#039;...essentially it is charge independent. Therefore, the electric potential energy of the positive charge would be increasing (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\alpha q E_o \Delta L&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;), and the electric potential would still be increasing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
A positive charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_o&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; travels through a spatially uniform electric field from Point &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; to Point &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;B&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; to Point &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, was depicted in the figure below. The coordinates of the points and magnitude of the electric field are defined in the figure.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricPotentialMiddlingExample.png|800px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Question 1&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&#039;&#039;&#039;a.) When the charge moves from Point &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; to Point &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;B&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, what is the change in electric potential?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution 1&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{AB} = - \int_B^A \mathbf{E} \cdot d \mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this case, the electric field is a constant &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(E_o, 0)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and the path is a straight line with components:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta  \mathbf{L} = B-A = (6, -3) - (0, 0) = (6, -3)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our expression for the change in electric potential simplifies to:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{AB} = - \mathbf{E} \cdot \Delta \mathbf{L} = - (E_o, 0) \cdot (6, -3) = -6E_o + 0 = - 6E_o = -300 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Question 2&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&#039;&#039;&#039;b.) When the charge moves from Point &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;B&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; to Point &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, what is the change in electric potential?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution 2&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Question 3&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&#039;&#039;&#039;c.) If instead of moving from Point &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; to Point &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;B&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; to Point &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, the charge moved from Point &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; directly to Point &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, what would the change in electric potential be?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution 3&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
===Externals links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Main Idea ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Calculate the change in electric potential between point A, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(-4, 3,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and B, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(2,-2,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; . The electric field in the location is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; (50,0,0) \; N/C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:EP mid fig.png ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer: -300V&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta\vec{l}= (2,-2,0)\;m - (-4,3,0)\;m = (6,-5,0)\;m &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -({E}_{x}∆{x} + {E}_{y}∆{y} + {E}_{z}∆{z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -(50\; N/C \cdot 6 \;m + 0 \; N/c \cdot -5 \; m + 0\cdot 0)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -300 V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Bohr Model]] of the hydrogen atom treats it as a nucleus of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; +e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; electrons of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; orbiting in circular orbits of specific radii. Calculate the potential difference between two points, one infinitely far away from the nucleus, and the other one Bohr radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; away from the nucleus (don&#039;t worry about substituting in the values). Compute the electric potential energy associated with the electron one Bohr radius away from the nucleus, setting the potential energy at infinity as zero (remember the sign of the charge). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We may compute the electric potential by taking integrating the electric field of a point charge as the radius goes from infinity to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. This integral may be set up as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\int_\infty^{a_0} \vec{E}\cdot\text{d}\vec{l} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \int_\infty^{a_0} \frac{\text{d} r}{r^2} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This may then be solved:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\biggr{(}\frac{1}{r}\biggr{|}_\infty^{a_0} = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
to compute the potential energy, we now multiply by the charge of the electron: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, giving &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -\frac{e^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Depending on what physics or chemistry courses you may have taken before, this may be recognizable as twice the ionization energy of the n=1 orbital. The factor of two is due to the fact that in the Bohr model, the kinetic energy will be exactly half of this potential energy, and will be positive so that the net result is still negative, but with half the magnitude. This understanding of the hydrogen atom gets certain values right, but the reality of the situation is far more complicated. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is this topic connected to something that you are interested in?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am interested in robotic systems and building circuit boards and electrical systems for manufacturing robots. While studying this section in the book, I was able to connect back many of the concepts and calculations back to robotics and the electrical component of automated systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Since high school, I never really understood how to work with the voltmeter and what it measured, and I have always wanted to know, but although this particular wiki page did not go into the details and other branches of electric potential, it led me to find the answers to something I was interested in since high school, the concept of electric potential.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I think electively is really interesting. When I was younger, I participated in this demo where a group of people hold hands and someone touches this special ball full of charge. We all could feel the tingling sensation of the current passing through us. It’s cool to learn the theory behind the supposed magic that occurs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I think it&#039;s very interesting that electric potential can be seen as a property of a space and that we can have further applications using this property.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is it connected to your major?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am a Mechanical Engineering major, so I will be dealing with the electrical components of machines when I work. Therefore, I have to know these certain concepts such as electric potential in order to fully understand how they work and interact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revistionist] As a biochemistry major, electric potential and electric potential difference is not particularly related to my major, but in chemistry classes, we use electrostatic potential maps (electrostatic potential energy maps) that shows the charge distributions throughout a molecule. Although the main use in electric potential is different in physics and biochemistry (where physicists use it identify the effect of the electric field at a location), I still found it interesting as the concept of electric potential (buildup) was being used in quite a different way. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I am a computer science major. Although I deal mostly with software, the hardware aspect is still important. The algorithms that I design run differently on different machines. The time complexity of an algorithm is sometimes useless when worrying about constant factors that are determined by a system’s hardware. Quicksort, for instance, is usually faster than many other sorts that have lower time complexities. The hardware of computers heavily relies on electricity and current (which is induced by a potential difference) to switch transistors on and off and thereby process information. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I am an aerospace engineering major, and I think understanding such concepts will help me have a better holistic understanding towards fields and systems. In addition, the thinking behind solving related problems will help me better prepared for future classes that involve with solving dynamics problems. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Is there an interesting industrial application?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] Electrical potential is used to find the voltage across a path. This is useful when working with circuit components and attempting to manipulate the power output or current throughout a component.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Electric potential sensors are being used to detect a variety of electrical signals made by the human body, thus contributing to the field of electrophysiology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] The study of electric potential has lead scientists to generate very safe wires that will not overheat and cause fires. Connecting circuits to ground is important and the third prong in an electrical outlet is this ground connection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The idea of electric potential, in a way, started with Ben Franklin and his experiments in the 1740s. He began to understand the flow of electricity, which eventually paved the path towards explaining electric potential and potential difference. Scientists finally began to understand how electric fields were actually affecting the charges and the surrounding environment. Benjamin Franklin first shocked himself in 1746, while conducting experiments on electricity with found objects from around his house. Six years later, or 261 years ago for us, the founding father flew a kite attached to a key and a silk ribbon in a thunderstorm and effectively trapped lightning in a jar. The experiment is now seen as a watershed moment in mankind&#039;s venture to channel a force of nature that was viewed quite abstractly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the time Franklin started experimenting with electricity, he&#039;d already found fame and fortune as the author of Poor Richard&#039;s Almanack. Electricity wasn&#039;t a very well understood phenomenon at that point, so Franklin&#039;s research proved to be fairly foundational. The early experiments, experts believe, were inspired by other scientists&#039; work and the shortcomings therein.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ep135.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
source: http://www.benjamin-franklin-history.org/kite-experiment/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That early brush with the dangers of electricity left an impression on Franklin. He described the sensation as &amp;quot;a universal blow throughout my whole body from head to foot, which seemed within as well as without; after which the first thing I took notice of was a violent quick shaking of my body.&amp;quot; However, it didn&#039;t scare him away. In the handful of years before his famous kite experiment, Franklin contributed everything from designing the first battery designs to establishing some common nomenclature in the study of electricity. Although Franklin is often coined the father of electricity, after he set the foundations of electricity, many other scientists contributed his or her research in the advancement of electricity and eventually led to the discovery of electric potential and potential difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like mentioned multiple times throughout the page, although electric potential is a huge and important topic, it has many branches, which makes the concept of electric potential difficult to stand alone. Even with this page, to support the concept of electric potential, many crucial branches of the topic appeared, like potential difference (which also branched into [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_Path_Independence,_claimed_by_Aditya_Mohile Potential Difference Path Independence]], [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_in_a_Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Uniform Field]], and [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_of_Point_Charge_in_a_Non-Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Nonuniform Field]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External Links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] https://www.khanacademy.org/test-prep/mcat/physical-processes/electrostatics-1/v/electric-potential-at-a-point-in-space&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pcWz4tP_zUw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vpa_uApmNoo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] https://www.khanacademy.org/science/electrical-engineering/ee-electrostatics/ee-fields-potential-voltage/a/ee-electric-potential-voltage&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] &amp;quot;Benjamin Franklin and Electricity.&amp;quot; Benjamin Franklin and Electricity. N.p., n.d. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.americaslibrary.gov/aa/franklinb/aa_franklinb_electric_1.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Bottyan, Thomas. &amp;quot;Electrostatic Potential Maps.&amp;quot; Chemwiki. N.p., 02 Oct. 2013. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://chemwiki.ucdavis.edu/Core/Theoretical_Chemistry/Chemical_Bonding/General_Principles_of_Chemical_Bonding/Electrostatic_Potential_maps&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] &amp;quot;Electric Potential Difference.&amp;quot; Electric Potential Difference. The Physics Classroom, n.d. Web. 14 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/circuits/Lesson-1/Electric-Potential-Difference&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] Harland, C. J., T. D. Clark, and R. J. Prance. &amp;quot;Applications of Electric Potential (Displacement Current) Sensors in Human Body Electrophysiology.&amp;quot; International Society for Industrial Process Tomography, n.d. Web. 16 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.isipt.org/world-congress/3/269.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] Sherwood, Bruce A. &amp;quot;2.1 The Momentum Principle.&amp;quot; Matter &amp;amp; Interactions. By Ruth W. Chabay. 4th ed. Vol. 1. N.p.: John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons, 2015. 45-50. Print. Modern Mechanics.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurence12799</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=File:ElectricPotentialMiddlingExample.png&amp;diff=39079</id>
		<title>File:ElectricPotentialMiddlingExample.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=File:ElectricPotentialMiddlingExample.png&amp;diff=39079"/>
		<updated>2020-11-21T20:49:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurence12799: This is a self-made diagram for the Electric Potential Middling example.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;This is a self-made diagram for the Electric Potential Middling example.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurence12799</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=39078</id>
		<title>Electric Potential</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=39078"/>
		<updated>2020-11-21T20:36:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurence12799: /* Middling */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039;, like all forms of potential energy, is the potential for work to be done, in this case by the electric force. The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; (frequently referred to as voltage, from its SI unit, the Volt) is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; associated with the test charge (1 Coulomb), such that it depends only on the source, just as the electric field is related to the electric force, but depends only on the source. One may similarly remember the parallel concept of the gravitational potential, which was gravitational potential energy divided by mass.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined with respect to the [[Electric Force]] &amp;amp; [[Electric Field]]:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} = - q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; from point b to point a&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the charge in the electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the source charge&#039;s electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a differential length along the path from point b to point a&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1150px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Derivation of Electric Potential Energy&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The differential work &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(dW)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; associated with an external force &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{F}_{ext})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moving a charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; from point b to point a &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(d\mathbf{L})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; through an electric field &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{E})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;dW = \mathbf{F}_{ext} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is the vector multiplication of the force moving the charge and the distance the object has moved.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The external force must be equal and opposite to the force associated with the source charge&#039;s electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{F}_{ext} &amp;amp;= - \mathbf{F}_{E} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= - q \mathbf{E}&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;dW = - q \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Integrating from point b to point a along the path gives:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W = -q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, since the work was defined externally, the calculated work is equal to the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} =  -q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricPotentialPaths.png|400px|right|thumb|Some sets of electrically equivalent paths for a charge.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From this, the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; per test charge in the source charge&#039;s electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{U_{ab}}{q} = - \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The electric field is a &#039;&#039;conservative vector field&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:::This means that any path used in the above line integral will give the same value for the same beginning and end points (b and a). Looking at the figure to the right, many paths for a charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; subject to the electric field of source charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are shown. In each set of four paths (Green, Blue, Yellow, and Pink), the same amount of &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is gained or lost. &lt;br /&gt;
*A special case shown in dark green near the bottom right of the figure also exists:&lt;br /&gt;
:::If a charge is moving along a path that is always perpendicular to the electric field, the line integral will evaluate to zero, and therefore the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; will also evaluate to zero.&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is easily shown with the dot product; if two variable vectors are always perpendicular, then their dot product is always zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricPotentialRadial.png|400px|right|thumb|Illustration of radial potential.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; from a source charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(Q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be written in a simpler expression:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr ( \frac{1}{r_{a}} - \frac{1}{r_{b}} \biggr )&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the source charge&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{a}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the final position &lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{b}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the initial position&lt;br /&gt;
:*The initial position is often taken to be infinity (the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined to be zero at infinity) creating a simpler and more familiar looking equation:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} r}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
:::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the distance between the source charge and the charge in the electric field&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is used to described the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; gained or lost when moving a charge radially closer to a source charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:740px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Derivation of Radial Potential&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If a charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is being moved in a source charge&#039;s &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(Q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; electric field &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{E})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; is:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} = - q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric field is known to be described radially as: ([[Electric Field]])&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{Q}{r^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Allow the path be along the radial direction:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d\mathbf{L} = dr \hat{\mathbf{r}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging these in gives:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
U_{ab} &amp;amp;= -q \int_{b}^{a} \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{Q}{r^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}} \cdot \hat{\mathbf{r}} dr \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= -q \int_{b}^{a} \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{Q}{r^2} dr \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= - \frac{qQ}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \int_{b}^{a} \frac{dr}{r^2} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= \frac{qQ}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr [ \frac{1}{r} \biggr ]_{b}^{a} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;=  \frac{qQ}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr ( \frac{1}{r_{a}} - \frac{1}{r_{b}} \biggr ) \\&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore, the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr ( \frac{1}{r_{a}} - \frac{1}{r_{b}} \biggr )&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Critical Formulas&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} = - q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{U_{ab}}{q}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} r}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
Click on the link to see &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; through VPython! Make sure to press &amp;quot;Run&amp;quot; to see the principle in action!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[https://trinket.io/embed/glowscript/0a7e486c94 Teach hand-on with GlowScript]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Watch this video for a more visual approach! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Rb9guSEeVE Electric Potential: Visualizing Voltage with 3D animations]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
A parallel plate capacitor is shown below:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricPotentialSimpleExample.png|400px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each plate has area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; with positive charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; on the left plate and negative charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;-Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; on the right plate. The distance between the plates is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Question 1&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&#039;&#039;&#039;a.) Which direction is the electric field between the plates pointed? How do you know?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution 1&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electric fields always point from positive to negative charge. Therefore, the electric field between the plates will point in the positive &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;-direction, straight from the left plate to the right plate since the distribution of positive and negative charge is flat and symmetric. The electric field will bend near the edges (called fringing fields). These are usually neglected if &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is much smaller than the length of the plates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Question 2&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&#039;&#039;&#039;b.) If the negative charge shown to be located near the negatively charged plate moved towards the positively charged plate, how would the electric potential and electric potential energy of the negative charge change?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution 2&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We start with noting that the charge (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_n=-\alpha q, \alpha &amp;gt; 0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) in question is a negative charge. This effectively means all analysis will be reversed i.e. if the electric potential energy was increasing for a positive charge, it would be decreasing for a negative charge. With that said, we can start by noticing that the charge is moving against the electric field between the plates. Since this a negative charge, this is the way that negative charge &#039;&#039;wants&#039;&#039; to move, meaning it is losing electric potential energy and gaining kinetic energy. This can be seen mathematically by the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} = -q \int_b^a \mathbf{E} \cdot d \mathbf{L} =  - (q_n) (-E_o) \Delta L = (-\alpha q)E_o \Delta L = -\alpha q E_o \Delta L&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (since the electric field is approximately constant between the plates &amp;amp; the electric field and path are aligned)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We can readily see that moving from position &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; to position &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (a distance of length &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta L&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) causes a decrease in electric potential energy since this is a negative charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now dividing &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; by &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; gives &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{U_{ab}}{q_n} = \frac{U_{ab}}{-\alpha q} = E_o \Delta L&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore the electric potential is increasing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Question 3&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&#039;&#039;&#039;c.) Redo part (b.) for a positive charge.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution 3&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We can reverse our answer from b. but keep in mind electric potential is &#039;&#039;per unit test charge&#039;&#039;...essentially it is charge independent. Therefore, the electric potential energy of the positive charge would be increasing (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\alpha q E_o \Delta L&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;), and the electric potential would still be increasing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
===Externals links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Main Idea ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Calculate the change in electric potential between point A, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(-4, 3,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and B, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(2,-2,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; . The electric field in the location is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; (50,0,0) \; N/C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:EP mid fig.png ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer: -300V&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta\vec{l}= (2,-2,0)\;m - (-4,3,0)\;m = (6,-5,0)\;m &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -({E}_{x}∆{x} + {E}_{y}∆{y} + {E}_{z}∆{z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -(50\; N/C \cdot 6 \;m + 0 \; N/c \cdot -5 \; m + 0\cdot 0)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -300 V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Bohr Model]] of the hydrogen atom treats it as a nucleus of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; +e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; electrons of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; orbiting in circular orbits of specific radii. Calculate the potential difference between two points, one infinitely far away from the nucleus, and the other one Bohr radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; away from the nucleus (don&#039;t worry about substituting in the values). Compute the electric potential energy associated with the electron one Bohr radius away from the nucleus, setting the potential energy at infinity as zero (remember the sign of the charge). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We may compute the electric potential by taking integrating the electric field of a point charge as the radius goes from infinity to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. This integral may be set up as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\int_\infty^{a_0} \vec{E}\cdot\text{d}\vec{l} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \int_\infty^{a_0} \frac{\text{d} r}{r^2} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This may then be solved:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\biggr{(}\frac{1}{r}\biggr{|}_\infty^{a_0} = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
to compute the potential energy, we now multiply by the charge of the electron: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, giving &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -\frac{e^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Depending on what physics or chemistry courses you may have taken before, this may be recognizable as twice the ionization energy of the n=1 orbital. The factor of two is due to the fact that in the Bohr model, the kinetic energy will be exactly half of this potential energy, and will be positive so that the net result is still negative, but with half the magnitude. This understanding of the hydrogen atom gets certain values right, but the reality of the situation is far more complicated. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is this topic connected to something that you are interested in?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am interested in robotic systems and building circuit boards and electrical systems for manufacturing robots. While studying this section in the book, I was able to connect back many of the concepts and calculations back to robotics and the electrical component of automated systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Since high school, I never really understood how to work with the voltmeter and what it measured, and I have always wanted to know, but although this particular wiki page did not go into the details and other branches of electric potential, it led me to find the answers to something I was interested in since high school, the concept of electric potential.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I think electively is really interesting. When I was younger, I participated in this demo where a group of people hold hands and someone touches this special ball full of charge. We all could feel the tingling sensation of the current passing through us. It’s cool to learn the theory behind the supposed magic that occurs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I think it&#039;s very interesting that electric potential can be seen as a property of a space and that we can have further applications using this property.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is it connected to your major?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am a Mechanical Engineering major, so I will be dealing with the electrical components of machines when I work. Therefore, I have to know these certain concepts such as electric potential in order to fully understand how they work and interact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revistionist] As a biochemistry major, electric potential and electric potential difference is not particularly related to my major, but in chemistry classes, we use electrostatic potential maps (electrostatic potential energy maps) that shows the charge distributions throughout a molecule. Although the main use in electric potential is different in physics and biochemistry (where physicists use it identify the effect of the electric field at a location), I still found it interesting as the concept of electric potential (buildup) was being used in quite a different way. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I am a computer science major. Although I deal mostly with software, the hardware aspect is still important. The algorithms that I design run differently on different machines. The time complexity of an algorithm is sometimes useless when worrying about constant factors that are determined by a system’s hardware. Quicksort, for instance, is usually faster than many other sorts that have lower time complexities. The hardware of computers heavily relies on electricity and current (which is induced by a potential difference) to switch transistors on and off and thereby process information. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I am an aerospace engineering major, and I think understanding such concepts will help me have a better holistic understanding towards fields and systems. In addition, the thinking behind solving related problems will help me better prepared for future classes that involve with solving dynamics problems. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Is there an interesting industrial application?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] Electrical potential is used to find the voltage across a path. This is useful when working with circuit components and attempting to manipulate the power output or current throughout a component.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Electric potential sensors are being used to detect a variety of electrical signals made by the human body, thus contributing to the field of electrophysiology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] The study of electric potential has lead scientists to generate very safe wires that will not overheat and cause fires. Connecting circuits to ground is important and the third prong in an electrical outlet is this ground connection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The idea of electric potential, in a way, started with Ben Franklin and his experiments in the 1740s. He began to understand the flow of electricity, which eventually paved the path towards explaining electric potential and potential difference. Scientists finally began to understand how electric fields were actually affecting the charges and the surrounding environment. Benjamin Franklin first shocked himself in 1746, while conducting experiments on electricity with found objects from around his house. Six years later, or 261 years ago for us, the founding father flew a kite attached to a key and a silk ribbon in a thunderstorm and effectively trapped lightning in a jar. The experiment is now seen as a watershed moment in mankind&#039;s venture to channel a force of nature that was viewed quite abstractly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the time Franklin started experimenting with electricity, he&#039;d already found fame and fortune as the author of Poor Richard&#039;s Almanack. Electricity wasn&#039;t a very well understood phenomenon at that point, so Franklin&#039;s research proved to be fairly foundational. The early experiments, experts believe, were inspired by other scientists&#039; work and the shortcomings therein.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ep135.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
source: http://www.benjamin-franklin-history.org/kite-experiment/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That early brush with the dangers of electricity left an impression on Franklin. He described the sensation as &amp;quot;a universal blow throughout my whole body from head to foot, which seemed within as well as without; after which the first thing I took notice of was a violent quick shaking of my body.&amp;quot; However, it didn&#039;t scare him away. In the handful of years before his famous kite experiment, Franklin contributed everything from designing the first battery designs to establishing some common nomenclature in the study of electricity. Although Franklin is often coined the father of electricity, after he set the foundations of electricity, many other scientists contributed his or her research in the advancement of electricity and eventually led to the discovery of electric potential and potential difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like mentioned multiple times throughout the page, although electric potential is a huge and important topic, it has many branches, which makes the concept of electric potential difficult to stand alone. Even with this page, to support the concept of electric potential, many crucial branches of the topic appeared, like potential difference (which also branched into [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_Path_Independence,_claimed_by_Aditya_Mohile Potential Difference Path Independence]], [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_in_a_Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Uniform Field]], and [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_of_Point_Charge_in_a_Non-Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Nonuniform Field]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External Links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] https://www.khanacademy.org/test-prep/mcat/physical-processes/electrostatics-1/v/electric-potential-at-a-point-in-space&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pcWz4tP_zUw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vpa_uApmNoo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] https://www.khanacademy.org/science/electrical-engineering/ee-electrostatics/ee-fields-potential-voltage/a/ee-electric-potential-voltage&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] &amp;quot;Benjamin Franklin and Electricity.&amp;quot; Benjamin Franklin and Electricity. N.p., n.d. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.americaslibrary.gov/aa/franklinb/aa_franklinb_electric_1.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Bottyan, Thomas. &amp;quot;Electrostatic Potential Maps.&amp;quot; Chemwiki. N.p., 02 Oct. 2013. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://chemwiki.ucdavis.edu/Core/Theoretical_Chemistry/Chemical_Bonding/General_Principles_of_Chemical_Bonding/Electrostatic_Potential_maps&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] &amp;quot;Electric Potential Difference.&amp;quot; Electric Potential Difference. The Physics Classroom, n.d. Web. 14 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/circuits/Lesson-1/Electric-Potential-Difference&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] Harland, C. J., T. D. Clark, and R. J. Prance. &amp;quot;Applications of Electric Potential (Displacement Current) Sensors in Human Body Electrophysiology.&amp;quot; International Society for Industrial Process Tomography, n.d. Web. 16 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.isipt.org/world-congress/3/269.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] Sherwood, Bruce A. &amp;quot;2.1 The Momentum Principle.&amp;quot; Matter &amp;amp; Interactions. By Ruth W. Chabay. 4th ed. Vol. 1. N.p.: John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons, 2015. 45-50. Print. Modern Mechanics.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurence12799</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=39077</id>
		<title>Electric Potential</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=39077"/>
		<updated>2020-11-21T19:44:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurence12799: /* Simple */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039;, like all forms of potential energy, is the potential for work to be done, in this case by the electric force. The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; (frequently referred to as voltage, from its SI unit, the Volt) is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; associated with the test charge (1 Coulomb), such that it depends only on the source, just as the electric field is related to the electric force, but depends only on the source. One may similarly remember the parallel concept of the gravitational potential, which was gravitational potential energy divided by mass.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined with respect to the [[Electric Force]] &amp;amp; [[Electric Field]]:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} = - q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; from point b to point a&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the charge in the electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the source charge&#039;s electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a differential length along the path from point b to point a&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1150px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Derivation of Electric Potential Energy&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The differential work &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(dW)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; associated with an external force &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{F}_{ext})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moving a charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; from point b to point a &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(d\mathbf{L})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; through an electric field &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{E})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;dW = \mathbf{F}_{ext} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is the vector multiplication of the force moving the charge and the distance the object has moved.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The external force must be equal and opposite to the force associated with the source charge&#039;s electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{F}_{ext} &amp;amp;= - \mathbf{F}_{E} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= - q \mathbf{E}&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;dW = - q \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Integrating from point b to point a along the path gives:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W = -q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, since the work was defined externally, the calculated work is equal to the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} =  -q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricPotentialPaths.png|400px|right|thumb|Some sets of electrically equivalent paths for a charge.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From this, the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; per test charge in the source charge&#039;s electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{U_{ab}}{q} = - \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The electric field is a &#039;&#039;conservative vector field&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:::This means that any path used in the above line integral will give the same value for the same beginning and end points (b and a). Looking at the figure to the right, many paths for a charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; subject to the electric field of source charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are shown. In each set of four paths (Green, Blue, Yellow, and Pink), the same amount of &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is gained or lost. &lt;br /&gt;
*A special case shown in dark green near the bottom right of the figure also exists:&lt;br /&gt;
:::If a charge is moving along a path that is always perpendicular to the electric field, the line integral will evaluate to zero, and therefore the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; will also evaluate to zero.&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is easily shown with the dot product; if two variable vectors are always perpendicular, then their dot product is always zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricPotentialRadial.png|400px|right|thumb|Illustration of radial potential.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; from a source charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(Q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be written in a simpler expression:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr ( \frac{1}{r_{a}} - \frac{1}{r_{b}} \biggr )&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the source charge&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{a}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the final position &lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{b}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the initial position&lt;br /&gt;
:*The initial position is often taken to be infinity (the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined to be zero at infinity) creating a simpler and more familiar looking equation:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} r}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
:::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the distance between the source charge and the charge in the electric field&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is used to described the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; gained or lost when moving a charge radially closer to a source charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:740px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Derivation of Radial Potential&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If a charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is being moved in a source charge&#039;s &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(Q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; electric field &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{E})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; is:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} = - q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric field is known to be described radially as: ([[Electric Field]])&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{Q}{r^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Allow the path be along the radial direction:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d\mathbf{L} = dr \hat{\mathbf{r}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging these in gives:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
U_{ab} &amp;amp;= -q \int_{b}^{a} \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{Q}{r^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}} \cdot \hat{\mathbf{r}} dr \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= -q \int_{b}^{a} \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{Q}{r^2} dr \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= - \frac{qQ}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \int_{b}^{a} \frac{dr}{r^2} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= \frac{qQ}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr [ \frac{1}{r} \biggr ]_{b}^{a} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;=  \frac{qQ}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr ( \frac{1}{r_{a}} - \frac{1}{r_{b}} \biggr ) \\&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore, the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr ( \frac{1}{r_{a}} - \frac{1}{r_{b}} \biggr )&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Critical Formulas&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} = - q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{U_{ab}}{q}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} r}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
Click on the link to see &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; through VPython! Make sure to press &amp;quot;Run&amp;quot; to see the principle in action!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[https://trinket.io/embed/glowscript/0a7e486c94 Teach hand-on with GlowScript]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Watch this video for a more visual approach! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Rb9guSEeVE Electric Potential: Visualizing Voltage with 3D animations]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
A parallel plate capacitor is shown below:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricPotentialSimpleExample.png|400px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each plate has area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; with positive charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; on the left plate and negative charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;-Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; on the right plate. The distance between the plates is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Question 1&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&#039;&#039;&#039;a.) Which direction is the electric field between the plates pointed? How do you know?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution 1&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electric fields always point from positive to negative charge. Therefore, the electric field between the plates will point in the positive &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;-direction, straight from the left plate to the right plate since the distribution of positive and negative charge is flat and symmetric. The electric field will bend near the edges (called fringing fields). These are usually neglected if &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is much smaller than the length of the plates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Question 2&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&#039;&#039;&#039;b.) If the negative charge shown to be located near the negatively charged plate moved towards the positively charged plate, how would the electric potential and electric potential energy of the negative charge change?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution 2&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We start with noting that the charge (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_n=-\alpha q, \alpha &amp;gt; 0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) in question is a negative charge. This effectively means all analysis will be reversed i.e. if the electric potential energy was increasing for a positive charge, it would be decreasing for a negative charge. With that said, we can start by noticing that the charge is moving against the electric field between the plates. Since this a negative charge, this is the way that negative charge &#039;&#039;wants&#039;&#039; to move, meaning it is losing electric potential energy and gaining kinetic energy. This can be seen mathematically by the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} = -q \int_b^a \mathbf{E} \cdot d \mathbf{L} =  - (q_n) (-E_o) \Delta L = (-\alpha q)E_o \Delta L = -\alpha q E_o \Delta L&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (since the electric field is approximately constant between the plates &amp;amp; the electric field and path are aligned)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We can readily see that moving from position &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; to position &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (a distance of length &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta L&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) causes a decrease in electric potential energy since this is a negative charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now dividing &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; by &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; gives &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{U_{ab}}{q_n} = \frac{U_{ab}}{-\alpha q} = E_o \Delta L&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore the electric potential is increasing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Question 3&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&#039;&#039;&#039;c.) Redo part (b.) for a positive charge.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution 3&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We can reverse our answer from b. but keep in mind electric potential is &#039;&#039;per unit test charge&#039;&#039;...essentially it is charge independent. Therefore, the electric potential energy of the positive charge would be increasing (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\alpha q E_o \Delta L&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;), and the electric potential would still be increasing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
===Externals links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Main Idea ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Calculate the change in electric potential between point A, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(-4, 3,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and B, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(2,-2,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; . The electric field in the location is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; (50,0,0) \; N/C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:EP mid fig.png ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer: -300V&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta\vec{l}= (2,-2,0)\;m - (-4,3,0)\;m = (6,-5,0)\;m &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -({E}_{x}∆{x} + {E}_{y}∆{y} + {E}_{z}∆{z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -(50\; N/C \cdot 6 \;m + 0 \; N/c \cdot -5 \; m + 0\cdot 0)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -300 V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Bohr Model]] of the hydrogen atom treats it as a nucleus of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; +e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; electrons of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; orbiting in circular orbits of specific radii. Calculate the potential difference between two points, one infinitely far away from the nucleus, and the other one Bohr radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; away from the nucleus (don&#039;t worry about substituting in the values). Compute the electric potential energy associated with the electron one Bohr radius away from the nucleus, setting the potential energy at infinity as zero (remember the sign of the charge). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We may compute the electric potential by taking integrating the electric field of a point charge as the radius goes from infinity to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. This integral may be set up as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\int_\infty^{a_0} \vec{E}\cdot\text{d}\vec{l} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \int_\infty^{a_0} \frac{\text{d} r}{r^2} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This may then be solved:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\biggr{(}\frac{1}{r}\biggr{|}_\infty^{a_0} = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
to compute the potential energy, we now multiply by the charge of the electron: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, giving &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -\frac{e^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Depending on what physics or chemistry courses you may have taken before, this may be recognizable as twice the ionization energy of the n=1 orbital. The factor of two is due to the fact that in the Bohr model, the kinetic energy will be exactly half of this potential energy, and will be positive so that the net result is still negative, but with half the magnitude. This understanding of the hydrogen atom gets certain values right, but the reality of the situation is far more complicated. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is this topic connected to something that you are interested in?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am interested in robotic systems and building circuit boards and electrical systems for manufacturing robots. While studying this section in the book, I was able to connect back many of the concepts and calculations back to robotics and the electrical component of automated systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Since high school, I never really understood how to work with the voltmeter and what it measured, and I have always wanted to know, but although this particular wiki page did not go into the details and other branches of electric potential, it led me to find the answers to something I was interested in since high school, the concept of electric potential.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I think electively is really interesting. When I was younger, I participated in this demo where a group of people hold hands and someone touches this special ball full of charge. We all could feel the tingling sensation of the current passing through us. It’s cool to learn the theory behind the supposed magic that occurs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I think it&#039;s very interesting that electric potential can be seen as a property of a space and that we can have further applications using this property.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is it connected to your major?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am a Mechanical Engineering major, so I will be dealing with the electrical components of machines when I work. Therefore, I have to know these certain concepts such as electric potential in order to fully understand how they work and interact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revistionist] As a biochemistry major, electric potential and electric potential difference is not particularly related to my major, but in chemistry classes, we use electrostatic potential maps (electrostatic potential energy maps) that shows the charge distributions throughout a molecule. Although the main use in electric potential is different in physics and biochemistry (where physicists use it identify the effect of the electric field at a location), I still found it interesting as the concept of electric potential (buildup) was being used in quite a different way. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I am a computer science major. Although I deal mostly with software, the hardware aspect is still important. The algorithms that I design run differently on different machines. The time complexity of an algorithm is sometimes useless when worrying about constant factors that are determined by a system’s hardware. Quicksort, for instance, is usually faster than many other sorts that have lower time complexities. The hardware of computers heavily relies on electricity and current (which is induced by a potential difference) to switch transistors on and off and thereby process information. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I am an aerospace engineering major, and I think understanding such concepts will help me have a better holistic understanding towards fields and systems. In addition, the thinking behind solving related problems will help me better prepared for future classes that involve with solving dynamics problems. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Is there an interesting industrial application?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] Electrical potential is used to find the voltage across a path. This is useful when working with circuit components and attempting to manipulate the power output or current throughout a component.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Electric potential sensors are being used to detect a variety of electrical signals made by the human body, thus contributing to the field of electrophysiology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] The study of electric potential has lead scientists to generate very safe wires that will not overheat and cause fires. Connecting circuits to ground is important and the third prong in an electrical outlet is this ground connection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The idea of electric potential, in a way, started with Ben Franklin and his experiments in the 1740s. He began to understand the flow of electricity, which eventually paved the path towards explaining electric potential and potential difference. Scientists finally began to understand how electric fields were actually affecting the charges and the surrounding environment. Benjamin Franklin first shocked himself in 1746, while conducting experiments on electricity with found objects from around his house. Six years later, or 261 years ago for us, the founding father flew a kite attached to a key and a silk ribbon in a thunderstorm and effectively trapped lightning in a jar. The experiment is now seen as a watershed moment in mankind&#039;s venture to channel a force of nature that was viewed quite abstractly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the time Franklin started experimenting with electricity, he&#039;d already found fame and fortune as the author of Poor Richard&#039;s Almanack. Electricity wasn&#039;t a very well understood phenomenon at that point, so Franklin&#039;s research proved to be fairly foundational. The early experiments, experts believe, were inspired by other scientists&#039; work and the shortcomings therein.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ep135.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
source: http://www.benjamin-franklin-history.org/kite-experiment/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That early brush with the dangers of electricity left an impression on Franklin. He described the sensation as &amp;quot;a universal blow throughout my whole body from head to foot, which seemed within as well as without; after which the first thing I took notice of was a violent quick shaking of my body.&amp;quot; However, it didn&#039;t scare him away. In the handful of years before his famous kite experiment, Franklin contributed everything from designing the first battery designs to establishing some common nomenclature in the study of electricity. Although Franklin is often coined the father of electricity, after he set the foundations of electricity, many other scientists contributed his or her research in the advancement of electricity and eventually led to the discovery of electric potential and potential difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like mentioned multiple times throughout the page, although electric potential is a huge and important topic, it has many branches, which makes the concept of electric potential difficult to stand alone. Even with this page, to support the concept of electric potential, many crucial branches of the topic appeared, like potential difference (which also branched into [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_Path_Independence,_claimed_by_Aditya_Mohile Potential Difference Path Independence]], [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_in_a_Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Uniform Field]], and [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_of_Point_Charge_in_a_Non-Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Nonuniform Field]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External Links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] https://www.khanacademy.org/test-prep/mcat/physical-processes/electrostatics-1/v/electric-potential-at-a-point-in-space&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pcWz4tP_zUw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vpa_uApmNoo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] https://www.khanacademy.org/science/electrical-engineering/ee-electrostatics/ee-fields-potential-voltage/a/ee-electric-potential-voltage&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] &amp;quot;Benjamin Franklin and Electricity.&amp;quot; Benjamin Franklin and Electricity. N.p., n.d. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.americaslibrary.gov/aa/franklinb/aa_franklinb_electric_1.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Bottyan, Thomas. &amp;quot;Electrostatic Potential Maps.&amp;quot; Chemwiki. N.p., 02 Oct. 2013. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://chemwiki.ucdavis.edu/Core/Theoretical_Chemistry/Chemical_Bonding/General_Principles_of_Chemical_Bonding/Electrostatic_Potential_maps&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] &amp;quot;Electric Potential Difference.&amp;quot; Electric Potential Difference. The Physics Classroom, n.d. Web. 14 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/circuits/Lesson-1/Electric-Potential-Difference&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] Harland, C. J., T. D. Clark, and R. J. Prance. &amp;quot;Applications of Electric Potential (Displacement Current) Sensors in Human Body Electrophysiology.&amp;quot; International Society for Industrial Process Tomography, n.d. Web. 16 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.isipt.org/world-congress/3/269.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] Sherwood, Bruce A. &amp;quot;2.1 The Momentum Principle.&amp;quot; Matter &amp;amp; Interactions. By Ruth W. Chabay. 4th ed. Vol. 1. N.p.: John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons, 2015. 45-50. Print. Modern Mechanics.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurence12799</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=39076</id>
		<title>Electric Potential</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=39076"/>
		<updated>2020-11-21T19:36:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurence12799: /* Simple */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039;, like all forms of potential energy, is the potential for work to be done, in this case by the electric force. The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; (frequently referred to as voltage, from its SI unit, the Volt) is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; associated with the test charge (1 Coulomb), such that it depends only on the source, just as the electric field is related to the electric force, but depends only on the source. One may similarly remember the parallel concept of the gravitational potential, which was gravitational potential energy divided by mass.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined with respect to the [[Electric Force]] &amp;amp; [[Electric Field]]:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} = - q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; from point b to point a&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the charge in the electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the source charge&#039;s electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a differential length along the path from point b to point a&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1150px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Derivation of Electric Potential Energy&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The differential work &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(dW)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; associated with an external force &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{F}_{ext})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moving a charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; from point b to point a &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(d\mathbf{L})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; through an electric field &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{E})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;dW = \mathbf{F}_{ext} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is the vector multiplication of the force moving the charge and the distance the object has moved.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The external force must be equal and opposite to the force associated with the source charge&#039;s electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{F}_{ext} &amp;amp;= - \mathbf{F}_{E} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= - q \mathbf{E}&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;dW = - q \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Integrating from point b to point a along the path gives:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W = -q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, since the work was defined externally, the calculated work is equal to the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} =  -q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricPotentialPaths.png|400px|right|thumb|Some sets of electrically equivalent paths for a charge.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From this, the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; per test charge in the source charge&#039;s electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{U_{ab}}{q} = - \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The electric field is a &#039;&#039;conservative vector field&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:::This means that any path used in the above line integral will give the same value for the same beginning and end points (b and a). Looking at the figure to the right, many paths for a charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; subject to the electric field of source charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are shown. In each set of four paths (Green, Blue, Yellow, and Pink), the same amount of &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is gained or lost. &lt;br /&gt;
*A special case shown in dark green near the bottom right of the figure also exists:&lt;br /&gt;
:::If a charge is moving along a path that is always perpendicular to the electric field, the line integral will evaluate to zero, and therefore the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; will also evaluate to zero.&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is easily shown with the dot product; if two variable vectors are always perpendicular, then their dot product is always zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricPotentialRadial.png|400px|right|thumb|Illustration of radial potential.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; from a source charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(Q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be written in a simpler expression:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr ( \frac{1}{r_{a}} - \frac{1}{r_{b}} \biggr )&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the source charge&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{a}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the final position &lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{b}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the initial position&lt;br /&gt;
:*The initial position is often taken to be infinity (the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined to be zero at infinity) creating a simpler and more familiar looking equation:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} r}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
:::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the distance between the source charge and the charge in the electric field&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is used to described the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; gained or lost when moving a charge radially closer to a source charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:740px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Derivation of Radial Potential&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If a charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is being moved in a source charge&#039;s &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(Q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; electric field &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{E})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; is:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} = - q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric field is known to be described radially as: ([[Electric Field]])&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{Q}{r^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Allow the path be along the radial direction:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d\mathbf{L} = dr \hat{\mathbf{r}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging these in gives:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
U_{ab} &amp;amp;= -q \int_{b}^{a} \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{Q}{r^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}} \cdot \hat{\mathbf{r}} dr \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= -q \int_{b}^{a} \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{Q}{r^2} dr \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= - \frac{qQ}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \int_{b}^{a} \frac{dr}{r^2} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= \frac{qQ}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr [ \frac{1}{r} \biggr ]_{b}^{a} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;=  \frac{qQ}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr ( \frac{1}{r_{a}} - \frac{1}{r_{b}} \biggr ) \\&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore, the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr ( \frac{1}{r_{a}} - \frac{1}{r_{b}} \biggr )&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Critical Formulas&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} = - q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{U_{ab}}{q}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} r}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
Click on the link to see &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; through VPython! Make sure to press &amp;quot;Run&amp;quot; to see the principle in action!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[https://trinket.io/embed/glowscript/0a7e486c94 Teach hand-on with GlowScript]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Watch this video for a more visual approach! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Rb9guSEeVE Electric Potential: Visualizing Voltage with 3D animations]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
A parallel plate capacitor is shown below:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricPotentialSimpleExample.png|400px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each plate has area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; with positive charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; on the left plate and negative charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;-Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; on the right plate. The distance between the plates is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Question 1&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&#039;&#039;&#039;a.) Which direction is the electric field between the plates pointed? How do you know?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution 1&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electric fields always point from positive to negative charge. Therefore, the electric field between the plates will point in the positive &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;-direction, straight from the left plate to the right plate since the distribution of positive and negative charge is flat and symmetric. The electric field will bend near the edges (called fringing fields). These are usually neglected if &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is much smaller than the length of the plates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Question 2&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&#039;&#039;&#039;b.) If the negative charge shown to be located near the negatively charged plate moved towards the positively charged plate, how would the electric potential and electric potential energy of the negative charge change?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution 2&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We start with noting that the charge (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_n=-\alpha q, \alpha &amp;gt; 0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) in question is a negative charge. This effectively means all analysis will be reversed i.e. if the electric potential energy was increasing for a positive charge, it would be decreasing for a negative charge. With that said, we can start by noticing that the charge is moving against the electric field between the plates. Since this a negative charge, this is the way that negative charge &#039;&#039;wants&#039;&#039; to move, meaning it is losing electric potential energy and gaining kinetic energy. This can be seen mathematically by the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} = -q \int_b^a \mathbf{E} \cdot d \mathbf{L} =  - (q_n) (-E_o) \Delta L = (-\alpha q)E_o \Delta L = -\alpha q E_o \Delta L&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (since the electric field is approximately constant between the plates &amp;amp; the electric field and path are aligned)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We can readily see that moving from position &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; to position &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (a distance of length &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta L&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) causes a decrease in electric potential energy since this is a negative charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now dividing &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; by &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; gives &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{U_{ab}}{q_n} = \frac{U_{ab}}{-\alpha q} = E_o \Delta L&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore the electric potential is increasing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Question 3&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&#039;&#039;&#039;c.) Redo part (b.) for a positive charge.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution 3&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We can reverse our answer from b. but keep in mind electric potential is &#039;&#039;per unit test charge&#039;&#039;...essentially it is charge independent. Therefore, the electric potential energy of the positive charge would be increasing (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\alpha q E_o \Delta L&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;), and the electric potential would still be increasing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
===Externals links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Main Idea ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
In a capacitor, the negative charges are located on the left plate, and the positive charges are located on the right plate. Location A is at the left end of the capacitor, and Location B is at the right end of the capacitor, or in other words, Location A and B are only different in terms of their x component location. The path moves from A to B. What is the direction of the electric field? Is the potential difference positive or negative? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ep125.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer: The electric field is to the left. The potential difference is increasing, or is positive.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
The electric field always moves away from the positive charge and towards the negative charge, which means the electric field in this example is to the left. Because the direction and the electric field and the direction of the path are opposite, the potential difference is increasing, or is positive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Calculate the change in electric potential between point A, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(-4, 3,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and B, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(2,-2,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; . The electric field in the location is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; (50,0,0) \; N/C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:EP mid fig.png ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer: -300V&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta\vec{l}= (2,-2,0)\;m - (-4,3,0)\;m = (6,-5,0)\;m &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -({E}_{x}∆{x} + {E}_{y}∆{y} + {E}_{z}∆{z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -(50\; N/C \cdot 6 \;m + 0 \; N/c \cdot -5 \; m + 0\cdot 0)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -300 V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Bohr Model]] of the hydrogen atom treats it as a nucleus of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; +e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; electrons of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; orbiting in circular orbits of specific radii. Calculate the potential difference between two points, one infinitely far away from the nucleus, and the other one Bohr radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; away from the nucleus (don&#039;t worry about substituting in the values). Compute the electric potential energy associated with the electron one Bohr radius away from the nucleus, setting the potential energy at infinity as zero (remember the sign of the charge). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We may compute the electric potential by taking integrating the electric field of a point charge as the radius goes from infinity to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. This integral may be set up as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\int_\infty^{a_0} \vec{E}\cdot\text{d}\vec{l} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \int_\infty^{a_0} \frac{\text{d} r}{r^2} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This may then be solved:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\biggr{(}\frac{1}{r}\biggr{|}_\infty^{a_0} = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
to compute the potential energy, we now multiply by the charge of the electron: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, giving &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -\frac{e^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Depending on what physics or chemistry courses you may have taken before, this may be recognizable as twice the ionization energy of the n=1 orbital. The factor of two is due to the fact that in the Bohr model, the kinetic energy will be exactly half of this potential energy, and will be positive so that the net result is still negative, but with half the magnitude. This understanding of the hydrogen atom gets certain values right, but the reality of the situation is far more complicated. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is this topic connected to something that you are interested in?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am interested in robotic systems and building circuit boards and electrical systems for manufacturing robots. While studying this section in the book, I was able to connect back many of the concepts and calculations back to robotics and the electrical component of automated systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Since high school, I never really understood how to work with the voltmeter and what it measured, and I have always wanted to know, but although this particular wiki page did not go into the details and other branches of electric potential, it led me to find the answers to something I was interested in since high school, the concept of electric potential.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I think electively is really interesting. When I was younger, I participated in this demo where a group of people hold hands and someone touches this special ball full of charge. We all could feel the tingling sensation of the current passing through us. It’s cool to learn the theory behind the supposed magic that occurs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I think it&#039;s very interesting that electric potential can be seen as a property of a space and that we can have further applications using this property.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is it connected to your major?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am a Mechanical Engineering major, so I will be dealing with the electrical components of machines when I work. Therefore, I have to know these certain concepts such as electric potential in order to fully understand how they work and interact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revistionist] As a biochemistry major, electric potential and electric potential difference is not particularly related to my major, but in chemistry classes, we use electrostatic potential maps (electrostatic potential energy maps) that shows the charge distributions throughout a molecule. Although the main use in electric potential is different in physics and biochemistry (where physicists use it identify the effect of the electric field at a location), I still found it interesting as the concept of electric potential (buildup) was being used in quite a different way. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I am a computer science major. Although I deal mostly with software, the hardware aspect is still important. The algorithms that I design run differently on different machines. The time complexity of an algorithm is sometimes useless when worrying about constant factors that are determined by a system’s hardware. Quicksort, for instance, is usually faster than many other sorts that have lower time complexities. The hardware of computers heavily relies on electricity and current (which is induced by a potential difference) to switch transistors on and off and thereby process information. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I am an aerospace engineering major, and I think understanding such concepts will help me have a better holistic understanding towards fields and systems. In addition, the thinking behind solving related problems will help me better prepared for future classes that involve with solving dynamics problems. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Is there an interesting industrial application?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] Electrical potential is used to find the voltage across a path. This is useful when working with circuit components and attempting to manipulate the power output or current throughout a component.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Electric potential sensors are being used to detect a variety of electrical signals made by the human body, thus contributing to the field of electrophysiology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] The study of electric potential has lead scientists to generate very safe wires that will not overheat and cause fires. Connecting circuits to ground is important and the third prong in an electrical outlet is this ground connection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The idea of electric potential, in a way, started with Ben Franklin and his experiments in the 1740s. He began to understand the flow of electricity, which eventually paved the path towards explaining electric potential and potential difference. Scientists finally began to understand how electric fields were actually affecting the charges and the surrounding environment. Benjamin Franklin first shocked himself in 1746, while conducting experiments on electricity with found objects from around his house. Six years later, or 261 years ago for us, the founding father flew a kite attached to a key and a silk ribbon in a thunderstorm and effectively trapped lightning in a jar. The experiment is now seen as a watershed moment in mankind&#039;s venture to channel a force of nature that was viewed quite abstractly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the time Franklin started experimenting with electricity, he&#039;d already found fame and fortune as the author of Poor Richard&#039;s Almanack. Electricity wasn&#039;t a very well understood phenomenon at that point, so Franklin&#039;s research proved to be fairly foundational. The early experiments, experts believe, were inspired by other scientists&#039; work and the shortcomings therein.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ep135.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
source: http://www.benjamin-franklin-history.org/kite-experiment/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That early brush with the dangers of electricity left an impression on Franklin. He described the sensation as &amp;quot;a universal blow throughout my whole body from head to foot, which seemed within as well as without; after which the first thing I took notice of was a violent quick shaking of my body.&amp;quot; However, it didn&#039;t scare him away. In the handful of years before his famous kite experiment, Franklin contributed everything from designing the first battery designs to establishing some common nomenclature in the study of electricity. Although Franklin is often coined the father of electricity, after he set the foundations of electricity, many other scientists contributed his or her research in the advancement of electricity and eventually led to the discovery of electric potential and potential difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like mentioned multiple times throughout the page, although electric potential is a huge and important topic, it has many branches, which makes the concept of electric potential difficult to stand alone. Even with this page, to support the concept of electric potential, many crucial branches of the topic appeared, like potential difference (which also branched into [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_Path_Independence,_claimed_by_Aditya_Mohile Potential Difference Path Independence]], [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_in_a_Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Uniform Field]], and [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_of_Point_Charge_in_a_Non-Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Nonuniform Field]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External Links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] https://www.khanacademy.org/test-prep/mcat/physical-processes/electrostatics-1/v/electric-potential-at-a-point-in-space&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pcWz4tP_zUw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vpa_uApmNoo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] https://www.khanacademy.org/science/electrical-engineering/ee-electrostatics/ee-fields-potential-voltage/a/ee-electric-potential-voltage&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] &amp;quot;Benjamin Franklin and Electricity.&amp;quot; Benjamin Franklin and Electricity. N.p., n.d. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.americaslibrary.gov/aa/franklinb/aa_franklinb_electric_1.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Bottyan, Thomas. &amp;quot;Electrostatic Potential Maps.&amp;quot; Chemwiki. N.p., 02 Oct. 2013. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://chemwiki.ucdavis.edu/Core/Theoretical_Chemistry/Chemical_Bonding/General_Principles_of_Chemical_Bonding/Electrostatic_Potential_maps&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] &amp;quot;Electric Potential Difference.&amp;quot; Electric Potential Difference. The Physics Classroom, n.d. Web. 14 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/circuits/Lesson-1/Electric-Potential-Difference&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] Harland, C. J., T. D. Clark, and R. J. Prance. &amp;quot;Applications of Electric Potential (Displacement Current) Sensors in Human Body Electrophysiology.&amp;quot; International Society for Industrial Process Tomography, n.d. Web. 16 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.isipt.org/world-congress/3/269.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] Sherwood, Bruce A. &amp;quot;2.1 The Momentum Principle.&amp;quot; Matter &amp;amp; Interactions. By Ruth W. Chabay. 4th ed. Vol. 1. N.p.: John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons, 2015. 45-50. Print. Modern Mechanics.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurence12799</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=38821</id>
		<title>Electric Potential</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=38821"/>
		<updated>2020-09-20T20:02:00Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurence12799: /* Simple */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039;, like all forms of potential energy, is the potential for work to be done, in this case by the electric force. The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; (frequently referred to as voltage, from its SI unit, the Volt) is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; associated with the test charge (1 Coulomb), such that it depends only on the source, just as the electric field is related to the electric force, but depends only on the source. One may similarly remember the parallel concept of the gravitational potential, which was gravitational potential energy divided by mass.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined with respect to the [[Electric Force]] &amp;amp; [[Electric Field]]:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} = - q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; from point b to point a&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the charge in the electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the source charge&#039;s electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a differential length along the path from point b to point a&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1150px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Derivation of Electric Potential Energy&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The differential work &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(dW)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; associated with an external force &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{F}_{ext})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moving a charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; from point b to point a &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(d\mathbf{L})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; through an electric field &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{E})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;dW = \mathbf{F}_{ext} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is the vector multiplication of the force moving the charge and the distance the object has moved.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The external force must be equal and opposite to the force associated with the source charge&#039;s electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{F}_{ext} &amp;amp;= - \mathbf{F}_{E} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= - q \mathbf{E}&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;dW = - q \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Integrating from point b to point a along the path gives:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W = -q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, since the work was defined externally, the calculated work is equal to the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} =  -q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricPotentialPaths.png|400px|right|thumb|Some sets of electrically equivalent paths for a charge.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From this, the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; per test charge in the source charge&#039;s electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{U_{ab}}{q} = - \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The electric field is a &#039;&#039;conservative vector field&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:::This means that any path used in the above line integral will give the same value for the same beginning and end points (b and a). Looking at the figure to the right, many paths for a charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; subject to the electric field of source charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are shown. In each set of four paths (Green, Blue, Yellow, and Pink), the same amount of &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is gained or lost. &lt;br /&gt;
*A special case shown in dark green near the bottom right of the figure also exists:&lt;br /&gt;
:::If a charge is moving along a path that is always perpendicular to the electric field, the line integral will evaluate to zero, and therefore the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; will also evaluate to zero.&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is easily shown with the dot product; if two variable vectors are always perpendicular, then their dot product is always zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricPotentialRadial.png|400px|right|thumb|Illustration of radial potential.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; from a source charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(Q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be written in a simpler expression:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr ( \frac{1}{r_{a}} - \frac{1}{r_{b}} \biggr )&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the source charge&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{a}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the final position &lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{b}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the initial position&lt;br /&gt;
:*The initial position is often taken to be infinity (the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined to be zero at infinity) creating a simpler and more familiar looking equation:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} r}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
:::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the distance between the source charge and the charge in the electric field&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is used to described the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; gained or lost when moving a charge radially closer to a source charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:740px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Derivation of Radial Potential&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If a charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is being moved in a source charge&#039;s &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(Q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; electric field &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{E})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; is:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} = - q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric field is known to be described radially as: ([[Electric Field]])&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{Q}{r^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Allow the path be along the radial direction:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d\mathbf{L} = dr \hat{\mathbf{r}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging these in gives:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
U_{ab} &amp;amp;= -q \int_{b}^{a} \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{Q}{r^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}} \cdot \hat{\mathbf{r}} dr \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= -q \int_{b}^{a} \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{Q}{r^2} dr \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= - \frac{qQ}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \int_{b}^{a} \frac{dr}{r^2} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= \frac{qQ}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr [ \frac{1}{r} \biggr ]_{b}^{a} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;=  \frac{qQ}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr ( \frac{1}{r_{a}} - \frac{1}{r_{b}} \biggr ) \\&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore, the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr ( \frac{1}{r_{a}} - \frac{1}{r_{b}} \biggr )&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Critical Formulas&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} = - q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{U_{ab}}{q}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} r}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
Click on the link to see &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; through VPython! Make sure to press &amp;quot;Run&amp;quot; to see the principle in action!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[https://trinket.io/embed/glowscript/0a7e486c94 Teach hand-on with GlowScript]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Watch this video for a more visual approach! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Rb9guSEeVE Electric Potential: Visualizing Voltage with 3D animations]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
A parallel plate capacitor is shown below:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricPotentialSimpleExample.png|400px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each plate has area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; with positive charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; on the left plate and negative charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;-Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; on the right plate. The distance between the plates is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Question 1&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&#039;&#039;&#039;a.) Which direction is the electric field between the plates pointed? How do you know?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution 1&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electric fields always point from positive to negative charge. Therefore, the electric field between the plates will point in the positive &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;-direction, straight from the left plate to the right plate since the distribution of positive and negative charge is flat and symmetric. The electric field will bend near the edges (called fringing fields). These are usually neglected if &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is much smaller than the length of the plates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Question 2&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&#039;&#039;&#039;b.) If the negative charge shown to be located near the negatively charged plate moved towards the positively charged plate, how would the electric potential and electric potential energy of the negative charge change?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution 2&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Question 3&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&#039;&#039;&#039;c.) Redo part (b.) for a positive charge.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution 3&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
===Externals links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Main Idea ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
In a capacitor, the negative charges are located on the left plate, and the positive charges are located on the right plate. Location A is at the left end of the capacitor, and Location B is at the right end of the capacitor, or in other words, Location A and B are only different in terms of their x component location. The path moves from A to B. What is the direction of the electric field? Is the potential difference positive or negative? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ep125.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer: The electric field is to the left. The potential difference is increasing, or is positive.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
The electric field always moves away from the positive charge and towards the negative charge, which means the electric field in this example is to the left. Because the direction and the electric field and the direction of the path are opposite, the potential difference is increasing, or is positive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Calculate the change in electric potential between point A, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(-4, 3,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and B, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(2,-2,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; . The electric field in the location is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; (50,0,0) \; N/C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:EP mid fig.png ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer: -300V&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta\vec{l}= (2,-2,0)\;m - (-4,3,0)\;m = (6,-5,0)\;m &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -({E}_{x}∆{x} + {E}_{y}∆{y} + {E}_{z}∆{z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -(50\; N/C \cdot 6 \;m + 0 \; N/c \cdot -5 \; m + 0\cdot 0)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -300 V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Bohr Model]] of the hydrogen atom treats it as a nucleus of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; +e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; electrons of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; orbiting in circular orbits of specific radii. Calculate the potential difference between two points, one infinitely far away from the nucleus, and the other one Bohr radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; away from the nucleus (don&#039;t worry about substituting in the values). Compute the electric potential energy associated with the electron one Bohr radius away from the nucleus, setting the potential energy at infinity as zero (remember the sign of the charge). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We may compute the electric potential by taking integrating the electric field of a point charge as the radius goes from infinity to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. This integral may be set up as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\int_\infty^{a_0} \vec{E}\cdot\text{d}\vec{l} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \int_\infty^{a_0} \frac{\text{d} r}{r^2} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This may then be solved:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\biggr{(}\frac{1}{r}\biggr{|}_\infty^{a_0} = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
to compute the potential energy, we now multiply by the charge of the electron: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, giving &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -\frac{e^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Depending on what physics or chemistry courses you may have taken before, this may be recognizable as twice the ionization energy of the n=1 orbital. The factor of two is due to the fact that in the Bohr model, the kinetic energy will be exactly half of this potential energy, and will be positive so that the net result is still negative, but with half the magnitude. This understanding of the hydrogen atom gets certain values right, but the reality of the situation is far more complicated. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is this topic connected to something that you are interested in?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am interested in robotic systems and building circuit boards and electrical systems for manufacturing robots. While studying this section in the book, I was able to connect back many of the concepts and calculations back to robotics and the electrical component of automated systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Since high school, I never really understood how to work with the voltmeter and what it measured, and I have always wanted to know, but although this particular wiki page did not go into the details and other branches of electric potential, it led me to find the answers to something I was interested in since high school, the concept of electric potential.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I think electively is really interesting. When I was younger, I participated in this demo where a group of people hold hands and someone touches this special ball full of charge. We all could feel the tingling sensation of the current passing through us. It’s cool to learn the theory behind the supposed magic that occurs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I think it&#039;s very interesting that electric potential can be seen as a property of a space and that we can have further applications using this property.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is it connected to your major?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am a Mechanical Engineering major, so I will be dealing with the electrical components of machines when I work. Therefore, I have to know these certain concepts such as electric potential in order to fully understand how they work and interact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revistionist] As a biochemistry major, electric potential and electric potential difference is not particularly related to my major, but in chemistry classes, we use electrostatic potential maps (electrostatic potential energy maps) that shows the charge distributions throughout a molecule. Although the main use in electric potential is different in physics and biochemistry (where physicists use it identify the effect of the electric field at a location), I still found it interesting as the concept of electric potential (buildup) was being used in quite a different way. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I am a computer science major. Although I deal mostly with software, the hardware aspect is still important. The algorithms that I design run differently on different machines. The time complexity of an algorithm is sometimes useless when worrying about constant factors that are determined by a system’s hardware. Quicksort, for instance, is usually faster than many other sorts that have lower time complexities. The hardware of computers heavily relies on electricity and current (which is induced by a potential difference) to switch transistors on and off and thereby process information. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I am an aerospace engineering major, and I think understanding such concepts will help me have a better holistic understanding towards fields and systems. In addition, the thinking behind solving related problems will help me better prepared for future classes that involve with solving dynamics problems. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Is there an interesting industrial application?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] Electrical potential is used to find the voltage across a path. This is useful when working with circuit components and attempting to manipulate the power output or current throughout a component.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Electric potential sensors are being used to detect a variety of electrical signals made by the human body, thus contributing to the field of electrophysiology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] The study of electric potential has lead scientists to generate very safe wires that will not overheat and cause fires. Connecting circuits to ground is important and the third prong in an electrical outlet is this ground connection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The idea of electric potential, in a way, started with Ben Franklin and his experiments in the 1740s. He began to understand the flow of electricity, which eventually paved the path towards explaining electric potential and potential difference. Scientists finally began to understand how electric fields were actually affecting the charges and the surrounding environment. Benjamin Franklin first shocked himself in 1746, while conducting experiments on electricity with found objects from around his house. Six years later, or 261 years ago for us, the founding father flew a kite attached to a key and a silk ribbon in a thunderstorm and effectively trapped lightning in a jar. The experiment is now seen as a watershed moment in mankind&#039;s venture to channel a force of nature that was viewed quite abstractly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the time Franklin started experimenting with electricity, he&#039;d already found fame and fortune as the author of Poor Richard&#039;s Almanack. Electricity wasn&#039;t a very well understood phenomenon at that point, so Franklin&#039;s research proved to be fairly foundational. The early experiments, experts believe, were inspired by other scientists&#039; work and the shortcomings therein.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ep135.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
source: http://www.benjamin-franklin-history.org/kite-experiment/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That early brush with the dangers of electricity left an impression on Franklin. He described the sensation as &amp;quot;a universal blow throughout my whole body from head to foot, which seemed within as well as without; after which the first thing I took notice of was a violent quick shaking of my body.&amp;quot; However, it didn&#039;t scare him away. In the handful of years before his famous kite experiment, Franklin contributed everything from designing the first battery designs to establishing some common nomenclature in the study of electricity. Although Franklin is often coined the father of electricity, after he set the foundations of electricity, many other scientists contributed his or her research in the advancement of electricity and eventually led to the discovery of electric potential and potential difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like mentioned multiple times throughout the page, although electric potential is a huge and important topic, it has many branches, which makes the concept of electric potential difficult to stand alone. Even with this page, to support the concept of electric potential, many crucial branches of the topic appeared, like potential difference (which also branched into [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_Path_Independence,_claimed_by_Aditya_Mohile Potential Difference Path Independence]], [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_in_a_Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Uniform Field]], and [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_of_Point_Charge_in_a_Non-Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Nonuniform Field]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External Links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] https://www.khanacademy.org/test-prep/mcat/physical-processes/electrostatics-1/v/electric-potential-at-a-point-in-space&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pcWz4tP_zUw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vpa_uApmNoo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] https://www.khanacademy.org/science/electrical-engineering/ee-electrostatics/ee-fields-potential-voltage/a/ee-electric-potential-voltage&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] &amp;quot;Benjamin Franklin and Electricity.&amp;quot; Benjamin Franklin and Electricity. N.p., n.d. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.americaslibrary.gov/aa/franklinb/aa_franklinb_electric_1.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Bottyan, Thomas. &amp;quot;Electrostatic Potential Maps.&amp;quot; Chemwiki. N.p., 02 Oct. 2013. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://chemwiki.ucdavis.edu/Core/Theoretical_Chemistry/Chemical_Bonding/General_Principles_of_Chemical_Bonding/Electrostatic_Potential_maps&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] &amp;quot;Electric Potential Difference.&amp;quot; Electric Potential Difference. The Physics Classroom, n.d. Web. 14 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/circuits/Lesson-1/Electric-Potential-Difference&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] Harland, C. J., T. D. Clark, and R. J. Prance. &amp;quot;Applications of Electric Potential (Displacement Current) Sensors in Human Body Electrophysiology.&amp;quot; International Society for Industrial Process Tomography, n.d. Web. 16 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.isipt.org/world-congress/3/269.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] Sherwood, Bruce A. &amp;quot;2.1 The Momentum Principle.&amp;quot; Matter &amp;amp; Interactions. By Ruth W. Chabay. 4th ed. Vol. 1. N.p.: John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons, 2015. 45-50. Print. Modern Mechanics.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurence12799</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=38820</id>
		<title>Electric Potential</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=38820"/>
		<updated>2020-09-20T19:53:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurence12799: /* Simple */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039;, like all forms of potential energy, is the potential for work to be done, in this case by the electric force. The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; (frequently referred to as voltage, from its SI unit, the Volt) is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; associated with the test charge (1 Coulomb), such that it depends only on the source, just as the electric field is related to the electric force, but depends only on the source. One may similarly remember the parallel concept of the gravitational potential, which was gravitational potential energy divided by mass.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined with respect to the [[Electric Force]] &amp;amp; [[Electric Field]]:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} = - q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; from point b to point a&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the charge in the electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the source charge&#039;s electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a differential length along the path from point b to point a&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1150px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Derivation of Electric Potential Energy&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The differential work &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(dW)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; associated with an external force &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{F}_{ext})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moving a charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; from point b to point a &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(d\mathbf{L})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; through an electric field &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{E})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;dW = \mathbf{F}_{ext} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is the vector multiplication of the force moving the charge and the distance the object has moved.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The external force must be equal and opposite to the force associated with the source charge&#039;s electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{F}_{ext} &amp;amp;= - \mathbf{F}_{E} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= - q \mathbf{E}&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;dW = - q \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Integrating from point b to point a along the path gives:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W = -q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, since the work was defined externally, the calculated work is equal to the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} =  -q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricPotentialPaths.png|400px|right|thumb|Some sets of electrically equivalent paths for a charge.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From this, the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; per test charge in the source charge&#039;s electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{U_{ab}}{q} = - \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The electric field is a &#039;&#039;conservative vector field&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:::This means that any path used in the above line integral will give the same value for the same beginning and end points (b and a). Looking at the figure to the right, many paths for a charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; subject to the electric field of source charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are shown. In each set of four paths (Green, Blue, Yellow, and Pink), the same amount of &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is gained or lost. &lt;br /&gt;
*A special case shown in dark green near the bottom right of the figure also exists:&lt;br /&gt;
:::If a charge is moving along a path that is always perpendicular to the electric field, the line integral will evaluate to zero, and therefore the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; will also evaluate to zero.&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is easily shown with the dot product; if two variable vectors are always perpendicular, then their dot product is always zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricPotentialRadial.png|400px|right|thumb|Illustration of radial potential.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; from a source charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(Q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be written in a simpler expression:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr ( \frac{1}{r_{a}} - \frac{1}{r_{b}} \biggr )&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the source charge&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{a}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the final position &lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{b}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the initial position&lt;br /&gt;
:*The initial position is often taken to be infinity (the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined to be zero at infinity) creating a simpler and more familiar looking equation:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} r}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
:::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the distance between the source charge and the charge in the electric field&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is used to described the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; gained or lost when moving a charge radially closer to a source charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:740px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Derivation of Radial Potential&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If a charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is being moved in a source charge&#039;s &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(Q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; electric field &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{E})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; is:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} = - q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric field is known to be described radially as: ([[Electric Field]])&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{Q}{r^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Allow the path be along the radial direction:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d\mathbf{L} = dr \hat{\mathbf{r}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging these in gives:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
U_{ab} &amp;amp;= -q \int_{b}^{a} \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{Q}{r^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}} \cdot \hat{\mathbf{r}} dr \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= -q \int_{b}^{a} \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{Q}{r^2} dr \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= - \frac{qQ}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \int_{b}^{a} \frac{dr}{r^2} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= \frac{qQ}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr [ \frac{1}{r} \biggr ]_{b}^{a} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;=  \frac{qQ}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr ( \frac{1}{r_{a}} - \frac{1}{r_{b}} \biggr ) \\&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore, the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr ( \frac{1}{r_{a}} - \frac{1}{r_{b}} \biggr )&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Critical Formulas&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} = - q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{U_{ab}}{q}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} r}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
Click on the link to see &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; through VPython! Make sure to press &amp;quot;Run&amp;quot; to see the principle in action!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[https://trinket.io/embed/glowscript/0a7e486c94 Teach hand-on with GlowScript]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Watch this video for a more visual approach! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Rb9guSEeVE Electric Potential: Visualizing Voltage with 3D animations]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
A parallel plate capacitor is shown below:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricPotentialSimpleExample.png|400px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each plate has area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; with positive charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; on the left plate and negative charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;-Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; on the right plate. The distance between the plates is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Question 1&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&#039;&#039;&#039;a.) Which direction is the electric field between the plates pointed? How do you know?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Question 2&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&#039;&#039;&#039;b.) If the negative charge shown to be located near the negatively charged plate moved towards the positively charged plate, how would the electric potential and electric potential energy of the negative charge change?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Question 3&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&#039;&#039;&#039;c.) Redo part (b.) for a positive charge.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
===Externals links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Main Idea ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
In a capacitor, the negative charges are located on the left plate, and the positive charges are located on the right plate. Location A is at the left end of the capacitor, and Location B is at the right end of the capacitor, or in other words, Location A and B are only different in terms of their x component location. The path moves from A to B. What is the direction of the electric field? Is the potential difference positive or negative? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ep125.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer: The electric field is to the left. The potential difference is increasing, or is positive.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
The electric field always moves away from the positive charge and towards the negative charge, which means the electric field in this example is to the left. Because the direction and the electric field and the direction of the path are opposite, the potential difference is increasing, or is positive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Calculate the change in electric potential between point A, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(-4, 3,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and B, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(2,-2,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; . The electric field in the location is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; (50,0,0) \; N/C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:EP mid fig.png ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer: -300V&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta\vec{l}= (2,-2,0)\;m - (-4,3,0)\;m = (6,-5,0)\;m &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -({E}_{x}∆{x} + {E}_{y}∆{y} + {E}_{z}∆{z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -(50\; N/C \cdot 6 \;m + 0 \; N/c \cdot -5 \; m + 0\cdot 0)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -300 V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Bohr Model]] of the hydrogen atom treats it as a nucleus of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; +e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; electrons of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; orbiting in circular orbits of specific radii. Calculate the potential difference between two points, one infinitely far away from the nucleus, and the other one Bohr radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; away from the nucleus (don&#039;t worry about substituting in the values). Compute the electric potential energy associated with the electron one Bohr radius away from the nucleus, setting the potential energy at infinity as zero (remember the sign of the charge). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We may compute the electric potential by taking integrating the electric field of a point charge as the radius goes from infinity to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. This integral may be set up as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\int_\infty^{a_0} \vec{E}\cdot\text{d}\vec{l} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \int_\infty^{a_0} \frac{\text{d} r}{r^2} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This may then be solved:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\biggr{(}\frac{1}{r}\biggr{|}_\infty^{a_0} = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
to compute the potential energy, we now multiply by the charge of the electron: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, giving &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -\frac{e^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Depending on what physics or chemistry courses you may have taken before, this may be recognizable as twice the ionization energy of the n=1 orbital. The factor of two is due to the fact that in the Bohr model, the kinetic energy will be exactly half of this potential energy, and will be positive so that the net result is still negative, but with half the magnitude. This understanding of the hydrogen atom gets certain values right, but the reality of the situation is far more complicated. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is this topic connected to something that you are interested in?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am interested in robotic systems and building circuit boards and electrical systems for manufacturing robots. While studying this section in the book, I was able to connect back many of the concepts and calculations back to robotics and the electrical component of automated systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Since high school, I never really understood how to work with the voltmeter and what it measured, and I have always wanted to know, but although this particular wiki page did not go into the details and other branches of electric potential, it led me to find the answers to something I was interested in since high school, the concept of electric potential.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I think electively is really interesting. When I was younger, I participated in this demo where a group of people hold hands and someone touches this special ball full of charge. We all could feel the tingling sensation of the current passing through us. It’s cool to learn the theory behind the supposed magic that occurs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I think it&#039;s very interesting that electric potential can be seen as a property of a space and that we can have further applications using this property.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is it connected to your major?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am a Mechanical Engineering major, so I will be dealing with the electrical components of machines when I work. Therefore, I have to know these certain concepts such as electric potential in order to fully understand how they work and interact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revistionist] As a biochemistry major, electric potential and electric potential difference is not particularly related to my major, but in chemistry classes, we use electrostatic potential maps (electrostatic potential energy maps) that shows the charge distributions throughout a molecule. Although the main use in electric potential is different in physics and biochemistry (where physicists use it identify the effect of the electric field at a location), I still found it interesting as the concept of electric potential (buildup) was being used in quite a different way. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I am a computer science major. Although I deal mostly with software, the hardware aspect is still important. The algorithms that I design run differently on different machines. The time complexity of an algorithm is sometimes useless when worrying about constant factors that are determined by a system’s hardware. Quicksort, for instance, is usually faster than many other sorts that have lower time complexities. The hardware of computers heavily relies on electricity and current (which is induced by a potential difference) to switch transistors on and off and thereby process information. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I am an aerospace engineering major, and I think understanding such concepts will help me have a better holistic understanding towards fields and systems. In addition, the thinking behind solving related problems will help me better prepared for future classes that involve with solving dynamics problems. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Is there an interesting industrial application?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] Electrical potential is used to find the voltage across a path. This is useful when working with circuit components and attempting to manipulate the power output or current throughout a component.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Electric potential sensors are being used to detect a variety of electrical signals made by the human body, thus contributing to the field of electrophysiology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] The study of electric potential has lead scientists to generate very safe wires that will not overheat and cause fires. Connecting circuits to ground is important and the third prong in an electrical outlet is this ground connection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The idea of electric potential, in a way, started with Ben Franklin and his experiments in the 1740s. He began to understand the flow of electricity, which eventually paved the path towards explaining electric potential and potential difference. Scientists finally began to understand how electric fields were actually affecting the charges and the surrounding environment. Benjamin Franklin first shocked himself in 1746, while conducting experiments on electricity with found objects from around his house. Six years later, or 261 years ago for us, the founding father flew a kite attached to a key and a silk ribbon in a thunderstorm and effectively trapped lightning in a jar. The experiment is now seen as a watershed moment in mankind&#039;s venture to channel a force of nature that was viewed quite abstractly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the time Franklin started experimenting with electricity, he&#039;d already found fame and fortune as the author of Poor Richard&#039;s Almanack. Electricity wasn&#039;t a very well understood phenomenon at that point, so Franklin&#039;s research proved to be fairly foundational. The early experiments, experts believe, were inspired by other scientists&#039; work and the shortcomings therein.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ep135.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
source: http://www.benjamin-franklin-history.org/kite-experiment/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That early brush with the dangers of electricity left an impression on Franklin. He described the sensation as &amp;quot;a universal blow throughout my whole body from head to foot, which seemed within as well as without; after which the first thing I took notice of was a violent quick shaking of my body.&amp;quot; However, it didn&#039;t scare him away. In the handful of years before his famous kite experiment, Franklin contributed everything from designing the first battery designs to establishing some common nomenclature in the study of electricity. Although Franklin is often coined the father of electricity, after he set the foundations of electricity, many other scientists contributed his or her research in the advancement of electricity and eventually led to the discovery of electric potential and potential difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like mentioned multiple times throughout the page, although electric potential is a huge and important topic, it has many branches, which makes the concept of electric potential difficult to stand alone. Even with this page, to support the concept of electric potential, many crucial branches of the topic appeared, like potential difference (which also branched into [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_Path_Independence,_claimed_by_Aditya_Mohile Potential Difference Path Independence]], [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_in_a_Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Uniform Field]], and [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_of_Point_Charge_in_a_Non-Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Nonuniform Field]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External Links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] https://www.khanacademy.org/test-prep/mcat/physical-processes/electrostatics-1/v/electric-potential-at-a-point-in-space&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pcWz4tP_zUw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vpa_uApmNoo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] https://www.khanacademy.org/science/electrical-engineering/ee-electrostatics/ee-fields-potential-voltage/a/ee-electric-potential-voltage&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] &amp;quot;Benjamin Franklin and Electricity.&amp;quot; Benjamin Franklin and Electricity. N.p., n.d. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.americaslibrary.gov/aa/franklinb/aa_franklinb_electric_1.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Bottyan, Thomas. &amp;quot;Electrostatic Potential Maps.&amp;quot; Chemwiki. N.p., 02 Oct. 2013. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://chemwiki.ucdavis.edu/Core/Theoretical_Chemistry/Chemical_Bonding/General_Principles_of_Chemical_Bonding/Electrostatic_Potential_maps&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] &amp;quot;Electric Potential Difference.&amp;quot; Electric Potential Difference. The Physics Classroom, n.d. Web. 14 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/circuits/Lesson-1/Electric-Potential-Difference&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] Harland, C. J., T. D. Clark, and R. J. Prance. &amp;quot;Applications of Electric Potential (Displacement Current) Sensors in Human Body Electrophysiology.&amp;quot; International Society for Industrial Process Tomography, n.d. Web. 16 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.isipt.org/world-congress/3/269.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] Sherwood, Bruce A. &amp;quot;2.1 The Momentum Principle.&amp;quot; Matter &amp;amp; Interactions. By Ruth W. Chabay. 4th ed. Vol. 1. N.p.: John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons, 2015. 45-50. Print. Modern Mechanics.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurence12799</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=File:ElectricPotentialSimpleExample.png&amp;diff=38819</id>
		<title>File:ElectricPotentialSimpleExample.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=File:ElectricPotentialSimpleExample.png&amp;diff=38819"/>
		<updated>2020-09-20T19:42:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurence12799: Figure created in Word for the Electric Potential Page&amp;#039;s Simple Example.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Figure created in Word for the Electric Potential Page&#039;s Simple Example.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurence12799</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=38818</id>
		<title>Electric Potential</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=38818"/>
		<updated>2020-09-20T19:13:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurence12799: /* Simple */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039;, like all forms of potential energy, is the potential for work to be done, in this case by the electric force. The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; (frequently referred to as voltage, from its SI unit, the Volt) is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; associated with the test charge (1 Coulomb), such that it depends only on the source, just as the electric field is related to the electric force, but depends only on the source. One may similarly remember the parallel concept of the gravitational potential, which was gravitational potential energy divided by mass.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined with respect to the [[Electric Force]] &amp;amp; [[Electric Field]]:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} = - q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; from point b to point a&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the charge in the electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the source charge&#039;s electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a differential length along the path from point b to point a&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1150px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Derivation of Electric Potential Energy&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The differential work &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(dW)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; associated with an external force &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{F}_{ext})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moving a charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; from point b to point a &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(d\mathbf{L})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; through an electric field &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{E})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;dW = \mathbf{F}_{ext} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is the vector multiplication of the force moving the charge and the distance the object has moved.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The external force must be equal and opposite to the force associated with the source charge&#039;s electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{F}_{ext} &amp;amp;= - \mathbf{F}_{E} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= - q \mathbf{E}&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;dW = - q \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Integrating from point b to point a along the path gives:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W = -q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, since the work was defined externally, the calculated work is equal to the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} =  -q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricPotentialPaths.png|400px|right|thumb|Some sets of electrically equivalent paths for a charge.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From this, the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; per test charge in the source charge&#039;s electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{U_{ab}}{q} = - \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The electric field is a &#039;&#039;conservative vector field&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:::This means that any path used in the above line integral will give the same value for the same beginning and end points (b and a). Looking at the figure to the right, many paths for a charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; subject to the electric field of source charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are shown. In each set of four paths (Green, Blue, Yellow, and Pink), the same amount of &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is gained or lost. &lt;br /&gt;
*A special case shown in dark green near the bottom right of the figure also exists:&lt;br /&gt;
:::If a charge is moving along a path that is always perpendicular to the electric field, the line integral will evaluate to zero, and therefore the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; will also evaluate to zero.&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is easily shown with the dot product; if two variable vectors are always perpendicular, then their dot product is always zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricPotentialRadial.png|400px|right|thumb|Illustration of radial potential.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; from a source charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(Q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be written in a simpler expression:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr ( \frac{1}{r_{a}} - \frac{1}{r_{b}} \biggr )&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the source charge&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{a}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the final position &lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{b}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the initial position&lt;br /&gt;
:*The initial position is often taken to be infinity (the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined to be zero at infinity) creating a simpler and more familiar looking equation:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} r}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
:::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the distance between the source charge and the charge in the electric field&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is used to described the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; gained or lost when moving a charge radially closer to a source charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:740px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Derivation of Radial Potential&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If a charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is being moved in a source charge&#039;s &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(Q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; electric field &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{E})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; is:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} = - q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric field is known to be described radially as: ([[Electric Field]])&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{Q}{r^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Allow the path be along the radial direction:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d\mathbf{L} = dr \hat{\mathbf{r}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging these in gives:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
U_{ab} &amp;amp;= -q \int_{b}^{a} \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{Q}{r^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}} \cdot \hat{\mathbf{r}} dr \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= -q \int_{b}^{a} \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{Q}{r^2} dr \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= - \frac{qQ}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \int_{b}^{a} \frac{dr}{r^2} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= \frac{qQ}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr [ \frac{1}{r} \biggr ]_{b}^{a} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;=  \frac{qQ}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr ( \frac{1}{r_{a}} - \frac{1}{r_{b}} \biggr ) \\&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore, the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr ( \frac{1}{r_{a}} - \frac{1}{r_{b}} \biggr )&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Critical Formulas&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} = - q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{U_{ab}}{q}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} r}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
Click on the link to see &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; through VPython! Make sure to press &amp;quot;Run&amp;quot; to see the principle in action!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[https://trinket.io/embed/glowscript/0a7e486c94 Teach hand-on with GlowScript]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Watch this video for a more visual approach! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Rb9guSEeVE Electric Potential: Visualizing Voltage with 3D animations]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
A parallel plate capacitor is shown below:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each plate has area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; with positive charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; on the right plate and negative charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;-Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; on the left plate. The distance between the plates is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
===Externals links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Main Idea ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
In a capacitor, the negative charges are located on the left plate, and the positive charges are located on the right plate. Location A is at the left end of the capacitor, and Location B is at the right end of the capacitor, or in other words, Location A and B are only different in terms of their x component location. The path moves from A to B. What is the direction of the electric field? Is the potential difference positive or negative? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ep125.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer: The electric field is to the left. The potential difference is increasing, or is positive.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
The electric field always moves away from the positive charge and towards the negative charge, which means the electric field in this example is to the left. Because the direction and the electric field and the direction of the path are opposite, the potential difference is increasing, or is positive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Calculate the change in electric potential between point A, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(-4, 3,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and B, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(2,-2,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; . The electric field in the location is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; (50,0,0) \; N/C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:EP mid fig.png ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer: -300V&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta\vec{l}= (2,-2,0)\;m - (-4,3,0)\;m = (6,-5,0)\;m &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -({E}_{x}∆{x} + {E}_{y}∆{y} + {E}_{z}∆{z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -(50\; N/C \cdot 6 \;m + 0 \; N/c \cdot -5 \; m + 0\cdot 0)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -300 V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Bohr Model]] of the hydrogen atom treats it as a nucleus of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; +e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; electrons of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; orbiting in circular orbits of specific radii. Calculate the potential difference between two points, one infinitely far away from the nucleus, and the other one Bohr radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; away from the nucleus (don&#039;t worry about substituting in the values). Compute the electric potential energy associated with the electron one Bohr radius away from the nucleus, setting the potential energy at infinity as zero (remember the sign of the charge). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We may compute the electric potential by taking integrating the electric field of a point charge as the radius goes from infinity to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. This integral may be set up as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\int_\infty^{a_0} \vec{E}\cdot\text{d}\vec{l} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \int_\infty^{a_0} \frac{\text{d} r}{r^2} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This may then be solved:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\biggr{(}\frac{1}{r}\biggr{|}_\infty^{a_0} = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
to compute the potential energy, we now multiply by the charge of the electron: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, giving &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -\frac{e^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Depending on what physics or chemistry courses you may have taken before, this may be recognizable as twice the ionization energy of the n=1 orbital. The factor of two is due to the fact that in the Bohr model, the kinetic energy will be exactly half of this potential energy, and will be positive so that the net result is still negative, but with half the magnitude. This understanding of the hydrogen atom gets certain values right, but the reality of the situation is far more complicated. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is this topic connected to something that you are interested in?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am interested in robotic systems and building circuit boards and electrical systems for manufacturing robots. While studying this section in the book, I was able to connect back many of the concepts and calculations back to robotics and the electrical component of automated systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Since high school, I never really understood how to work with the voltmeter and what it measured, and I have always wanted to know, but although this particular wiki page did not go into the details and other branches of electric potential, it led me to find the answers to something I was interested in since high school, the concept of electric potential.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I think electively is really interesting. When I was younger, I participated in this demo where a group of people hold hands and someone touches this special ball full of charge. We all could feel the tingling sensation of the current passing through us. It’s cool to learn the theory behind the supposed magic that occurs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I think it&#039;s very interesting that electric potential can be seen as a property of a space and that we can have further applications using this property.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is it connected to your major?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am a Mechanical Engineering major, so I will be dealing with the electrical components of machines when I work. Therefore, I have to know these certain concepts such as electric potential in order to fully understand how they work and interact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revistionist] As a biochemistry major, electric potential and electric potential difference is not particularly related to my major, but in chemistry classes, we use electrostatic potential maps (electrostatic potential energy maps) that shows the charge distributions throughout a molecule. Although the main use in electric potential is different in physics and biochemistry (where physicists use it identify the effect of the electric field at a location), I still found it interesting as the concept of electric potential (buildup) was being used in quite a different way. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I am a computer science major. Although I deal mostly with software, the hardware aspect is still important. The algorithms that I design run differently on different machines. The time complexity of an algorithm is sometimes useless when worrying about constant factors that are determined by a system’s hardware. Quicksort, for instance, is usually faster than many other sorts that have lower time complexities. The hardware of computers heavily relies on electricity and current (which is induced by a potential difference) to switch transistors on and off and thereby process information. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I am an aerospace engineering major, and I think understanding such concepts will help me have a better holistic understanding towards fields and systems. In addition, the thinking behind solving related problems will help me better prepared for future classes that involve with solving dynamics problems. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Is there an interesting industrial application?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] Electrical potential is used to find the voltage across a path. This is useful when working with circuit components and attempting to manipulate the power output or current throughout a component.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Electric potential sensors are being used to detect a variety of electrical signals made by the human body, thus contributing to the field of electrophysiology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] The study of electric potential has lead scientists to generate very safe wires that will not overheat and cause fires. Connecting circuits to ground is important and the third prong in an electrical outlet is this ground connection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The idea of electric potential, in a way, started with Ben Franklin and his experiments in the 1740s. He began to understand the flow of electricity, which eventually paved the path towards explaining electric potential and potential difference. Scientists finally began to understand how electric fields were actually affecting the charges and the surrounding environment. Benjamin Franklin first shocked himself in 1746, while conducting experiments on electricity with found objects from around his house. Six years later, or 261 years ago for us, the founding father flew a kite attached to a key and a silk ribbon in a thunderstorm and effectively trapped lightning in a jar. The experiment is now seen as a watershed moment in mankind&#039;s venture to channel a force of nature that was viewed quite abstractly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the time Franklin started experimenting with electricity, he&#039;d already found fame and fortune as the author of Poor Richard&#039;s Almanack. Electricity wasn&#039;t a very well understood phenomenon at that point, so Franklin&#039;s research proved to be fairly foundational. The early experiments, experts believe, were inspired by other scientists&#039; work and the shortcomings therein.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ep135.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
source: http://www.benjamin-franklin-history.org/kite-experiment/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That early brush with the dangers of electricity left an impression on Franklin. He described the sensation as &amp;quot;a universal blow throughout my whole body from head to foot, which seemed within as well as without; after which the first thing I took notice of was a violent quick shaking of my body.&amp;quot; However, it didn&#039;t scare him away. In the handful of years before his famous kite experiment, Franklin contributed everything from designing the first battery designs to establishing some common nomenclature in the study of electricity. Although Franklin is often coined the father of electricity, after he set the foundations of electricity, many other scientists contributed his or her research in the advancement of electricity and eventually led to the discovery of electric potential and potential difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like mentioned multiple times throughout the page, although electric potential is a huge and important topic, it has many branches, which makes the concept of electric potential difficult to stand alone. Even with this page, to support the concept of electric potential, many crucial branches of the topic appeared, like potential difference (which also branched into [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_Path_Independence,_claimed_by_Aditya_Mohile Potential Difference Path Independence]], [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_in_a_Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Uniform Field]], and [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_of_Point_Charge_in_a_Non-Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Nonuniform Field]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External Links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] https://www.khanacademy.org/test-prep/mcat/physical-processes/electrostatics-1/v/electric-potential-at-a-point-in-space&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pcWz4tP_zUw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vpa_uApmNoo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] https://www.khanacademy.org/science/electrical-engineering/ee-electrostatics/ee-fields-potential-voltage/a/ee-electric-potential-voltage&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] &amp;quot;Benjamin Franklin and Electricity.&amp;quot; Benjamin Franklin and Electricity. N.p., n.d. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.americaslibrary.gov/aa/franklinb/aa_franklinb_electric_1.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Bottyan, Thomas. &amp;quot;Electrostatic Potential Maps.&amp;quot; Chemwiki. N.p., 02 Oct. 2013. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://chemwiki.ucdavis.edu/Core/Theoretical_Chemistry/Chemical_Bonding/General_Principles_of_Chemical_Bonding/Electrostatic_Potential_maps&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] &amp;quot;Electric Potential Difference.&amp;quot; Electric Potential Difference. The Physics Classroom, n.d. Web. 14 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/circuits/Lesson-1/Electric-Potential-Difference&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] Harland, C. J., T. D. Clark, and R. J. Prance. &amp;quot;Applications of Electric Potential (Displacement Current) Sensors in Human Body Electrophysiology.&amp;quot; International Society for Industrial Process Tomography, n.d. Web. 16 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.isipt.org/world-congress/3/269.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] Sherwood, Bruce A. &amp;quot;2.1 The Momentum Principle.&amp;quot; Matter &amp;amp; Interactions. By Ruth W. Chabay. 4th ed. Vol. 1. N.p.: John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons, 2015. 45-50. Print. Modern Mechanics.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurence12799</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=38817</id>
		<title>Electric Potential</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=38817"/>
		<updated>2020-09-20T19:01:52Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurence12799: /* A Computational Model */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039;, like all forms of potential energy, is the potential for work to be done, in this case by the electric force. The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; (frequently referred to as voltage, from its SI unit, the Volt) is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; associated with the test charge (1 Coulomb), such that it depends only on the source, just as the electric field is related to the electric force, but depends only on the source. One may similarly remember the parallel concept of the gravitational potential, which was gravitational potential energy divided by mass.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined with respect to the [[Electric Force]] &amp;amp; [[Electric Field]]:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} = - q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; from point b to point a&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the charge in the electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the source charge&#039;s electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a differential length along the path from point b to point a&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1150px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Derivation of Electric Potential Energy&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The differential work &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(dW)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; associated with an external force &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{F}_{ext})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moving a charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; from point b to point a &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(d\mathbf{L})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; through an electric field &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{E})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;dW = \mathbf{F}_{ext} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is the vector multiplication of the force moving the charge and the distance the object has moved.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The external force must be equal and opposite to the force associated with the source charge&#039;s electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{F}_{ext} &amp;amp;= - \mathbf{F}_{E} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= - q \mathbf{E}&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;dW = - q \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Integrating from point b to point a along the path gives:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W = -q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, since the work was defined externally, the calculated work is equal to the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} =  -q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricPotentialPaths.png|400px|right|thumb|Some sets of electrically equivalent paths for a charge.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From this, the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; per test charge in the source charge&#039;s electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{U_{ab}}{q} = - \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The electric field is a &#039;&#039;conservative vector field&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:::This means that any path used in the above line integral will give the same value for the same beginning and end points (b and a). Looking at the figure to the right, many paths for a charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; subject to the electric field of source charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are shown. In each set of four paths (Green, Blue, Yellow, and Pink), the same amount of &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is gained or lost. &lt;br /&gt;
*A special case shown in dark green near the bottom right of the figure also exists:&lt;br /&gt;
:::If a charge is moving along a path that is always perpendicular to the electric field, the line integral will evaluate to zero, and therefore the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; will also evaluate to zero.&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is easily shown with the dot product; if two variable vectors are always perpendicular, then their dot product is always zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricPotentialRadial.png|400px|right|thumb|Illustration of radial potential.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; from a source charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(Q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be written in a simpler expression:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr ( \frac{1}{r_{a}} - \frac{1}{r_{b}} \biggr )&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the source charge&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{a}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the final position &lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{b}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the initial position&lt;br /&gt;
:*The initial position is often taken to be infinity (the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined to be zero at infinity) creating a simpler and more familiar looking equation:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} r}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
:::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the distance between the source charge and the charge in the electric field&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is used to described the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; gained or lost when moving a charge radially closer to a source charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:740px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Derivation of Radial Potential&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If a charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is being moved in a source charge&#039;s &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(Q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; electric field &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{E})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; is:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} = - q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric field is known to be described radially as: ([[Electric Field]])&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{Q}{r^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Allow the path be along the radial direction:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d\mathbf{L} = dr \hat{\mathbf{r}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging these in gives:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
U_{ab} &amp;amp;= -q \int_{b}^{a} \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{Q}{r^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}} \cdot \hat{\mathbf{r}} dr \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= -q \int_{b}^{a} \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{Q}{r^2} dr \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= - \frac{qQ}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \int_{b}^{a} \frac{dr}{r^2} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= \frac{qQ}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr [ \frac{1}{r} \biggr ]_{b}^{a} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;=  \frac{qQ}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr ( \frac{1}{r_{a}} - \frac{1}{r_{b}} \biggr ) \\&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore, the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr ( \frac{1}{r_{a}} - \frac{1}{r_{b}} \biggr )&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Critical Formulas&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} = - q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{U_{ab}}{q}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} r}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
Click on the link to see &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; through VPython! Make sure to press &amp;quot;Run&amp;quot; to see the principle in action!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[https://trinket.io/embed/glowscript/0a7e486c94 Teach hand-on with GlowScript]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Watch this video for a more visual approach! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Rb9guSEeVE Electric Potential: Visualizing Voltage with 3D animations]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
===Externals links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Main Idea ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
In a capacitor, the negative charges are located on the left plate, and the positive charges are located on the right plate. Location A is at the left end of the capacitor, and Location B is at the right end of the capacitor, or in other words, Location A and B are only different in terms of their x component location. The path moves from A to B. What is the direction of the electric field? Is the potential difference positive or negative? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ep125.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer: The electric field is to the left. The potential difference is increasing, or is positive.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
The electric field always moves away from the positive charge and towards the negative charge, which means the electric field in this example is to the left. Because the direction and the electric field and the direction of the path are opposite, the potential difference is increasing, or is positive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Calculate the change in electric potential between point A, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(-4, 3,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and B, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(2,-2,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; . The electric field in the location is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; (50,0,0) \; N/C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:EP mid fig.png ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer: -300V&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta\vec{l}= (2,-2,0)\;m - (-4,3,0)\;m = (6,-5,0)\;m &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -({E}_{x}∆{x} + {E}_{y}∆{y} + {E}_{z}∆{z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -(50\; N/C \cdot 6 \;m + 0 \; N/c \cdot -5 \; m + 0\cdot 0)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -300 V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Bohr Model]] of the hydrogen atom treats it as a nucleus of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; +e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; electrons of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; orbiting in circular orbits of specific radii. Calculate the potential difference between two points, one infinitely far away from the nucleus, and the other one Bohr radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; away from the nucleus (don&#039;t worry about substituting in the values). Compute the electric potential energy associated with the electron one Bohr radius away from the nucleus, setting the potential energy at infinity as zero (remember the sign of the charge). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We may compute the electric potential by taking integrating the electric field of a point charge as the radius goes from infinity to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. This integral may be set up as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\int_\infty^{a_0} \vec{E}\cdot\text{d}\vec{l} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \int_\infty^{a_0} \frac{\text{d} r}{r^2} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This may then be solved:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\biggr{(}\frac{1}{r}\biggr{|}_\infty^{a_0} = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
to compute the potential energy, we now multiply by the charge of the electron: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, giving &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -\frac{e^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Depending on what physics or chemistry courses you may have taken before, this may be recognizable as twice the ionization energy of the n=1 orbital. The factor of two is due to the fact that in the Bohr model, the kinetic energy will be exactly half of this potential energy, and will be positive so that the net result is still negative, but with half the magnitude. This understanding of the hydrogen atom gets certain values right, but the reality of the situation is far more complicated. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is this topic connected to something that you are interested in?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am interested in robotic systems and building circuit boards and electrical systems for manufacturing robots. While studying this section in the book, I was able to connect back many of the concepts and calculations back to robotics and the electrical component of automated systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Since high school, I never really understood how to work with the voltmeter and what it measured, and I have always wanted to know, but although this particular wiki page did not go into the details and other branches of electric potential, it led me to find the answers to something I was interested in since high school, the concept of electric potential.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I think electively is really interesting. When I was younger, I participated in this demo where a group of people hold hands and someone touches this special ball full of charge. We all could feel the tingling sensation of the current passing through us. It’s cool to learn the theory behind the supposed magic that occurs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I think it&#039;s very interesting that electric potential can be seen as a property of a space and that we can have further applications using this property.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is it connected to your major?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am a Mechanical Engineering major, so I will be dealing with the electrical components of machines when I work. Therefore, I have to know these certain concepts such as electric potential in order to fully understand how they work and interact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revistionist] As a biochemistry major, electric potential and electric potential difference is not particularly related to my major, but in chemistry classes, we use electrostatic potential maps (electrostatic potential energy maps) that shows the charge distributions throughout a molecule. Although the main use in electric potential is different in physics and biochemistry (where physicists use it identify the effect of the electric field at a location), I still found it interesting as the concept of electric potential (buildup) was being used in quite a different way. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I am a computer science major. Although I deal mostly with software, the hardware aspect is still important. The algorithms that I design run differently on different machines. The time complexity of an algorithm is sometimes useless when worrying about constant factors that are determined by a system’s hardware. Quicksort, for instance, is usually faster than many other sorts that have lower time complexities. The hardware of computers heavily relies on electricity and current (which is induced by a potential difference) to switch transistors on and off and thereby process information. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I am an aerospace engineering major, and I think understanding such concepts will help me have a better holistic understanding towards fields and systems. In addition, the thinking behind solving related problems will help me better prepared for future classes that involve with solving dynamics problems. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Is there an interesting industrial application?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] Electrical potential is used to find the voltage across a path. This is useful when working with circuit components and attempting to manipulate the power output or current throughout a component.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Electric potential sensors are being used to detect a variety of electrical signals made by the human body, thus contributing to the field of electrophysiology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] The study of electric potential has lead scientists to generate very safe wires that will not overheat and cause fires. Connecting circuits to ground is important and the third prong in an electrical outlet is this ground connection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The idea of electric potential, in a way, started with Ben Franklin and his experiments in the 1740s. He began to understand the flow of electricity, which eventually paved the path towards explaining electric potential and potential difference. Scientists finally began to understand how electric fields were actually affecting the charges and the surrounding environment. Benjamin Franklin first shocked himself in 1746, while conducting experiments on electricity with found objects from around his house. Six years later, or 261 years ago for us, the founding father flew a kite attached to a key and a silk ribbon in a thunderstorm and effectively trapped lightning in a jar. The experiment is now seen as a watershed moment in mankind&#039;s venture to channel a force of nature that was viewed quite abstractly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the time Franklin started experimenting with electricity, he&#039;d already found fame and fortune as the author of Poor Richard&#039;s Almanack. Electricity wasn&#039;t a very well understood phenomenon at that point, so Franklin&#039;s research proved to be fairly foundational. The early experiments, experts believe, were inspired by other scientists&#039; work and the shortcomings therein.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ep135.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
source: http://www.benjamin-franklin-history.org/kite-experiment/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That early brush with the dangers of electricity left an impression on Franklin. He described the sensation as &amp;quot;a universal blow throughout my whole body from head to foot, which seemed within as well as without; after which the first thing I took notice of was a violent quick shaking of my body.&amp;quot; However, it didn&#039;t scare him away. In the handful of years before his famous kite experiment, Franklin contributed everything from designing the first battery designs to establishing some common nomenclature in the study of electricity. Although Franklin is often coined the father of electricity, after he set the foundations of electricity, many other scientists contributed his or her research in the advancement of electricity and eventually led to the discovery of electric potential and potential difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like mentioned multiple times throughout the page, although electric potential is a huge and important topic, it has many branches, which makes the concept of electric potential difficult to stand alone. Even with this page, to support the concept of electric potential, many crucial branches of the topic appeared, like potential difference (which also branched into [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_Path_Independence,_claimed_by_Aditya_Mohile Potential Difference Path Independence]], [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_in_a_Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Uniform Field]], and [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_of_Point_Charge_in_a_Non-Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Nonuniform Field]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External Links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] https://www.khanacademy.org/test-prep/mcat/physical-processes/electrostatics-1/v/electric-potential-at-a-point-in-space&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pcWz4tP_zUw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vpa_uApmNoo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] https://www.khanacademy.org/science/electrical-engineering/ee-electrostatics/ee-fields-potential-voltage/a/ee-electric-potential-voltage&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] &amp;quot;Benjamin Franklin and Electricity.&amp;quot; Benjamin Franklin and Electricity. N.p., n.d. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.americaslibrary.gov/aa/franklinb/aa_franklinb_electric_1.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Bottyan, Thomas. &amp;quot;Electrostatic Potential Maps.&amp;quot; Chemwiki. N.p., 02 Oct. 2013. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://chemwiki.ucdavis.edu/Core/Theoretical_Chemistry/Chemical_Bonding/General_Principles_of_Chemical_Bonding/Electrostatic_Potential_maps&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] &amp;quot;Electric Potential Difference.&amp;quot; Electric Potential Difference. The Physics Classroom, n.d. Web. 14 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/circuits/Lesson-1/Electric-Potential-Difference&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] Harland, C. J., T. D. Clark, and R. J. Prance. &amp;quot;Applications of Electric Potential (Displacement Current) Sensors in Human Body Electrophysiology.&amp;quot; International Society for Industrial Process Tomography, n.d. Web. 16 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.isipt.org/world-congress/3/269.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] Sherwood, Bruce A. &amp;quot;2.1 The Momentum Principle.&amp;quot; Matter &amp;amp; Interactions. By Ruth W. Chabay. 4th ed. Vol. 1. N.p.: John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons, 2015. 45-50. Print. Modern Mechanics.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurence12799</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=38816</id>
		<title>Electric Potential</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=38816"/>
		<updated>2020-09-20T18:59:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurence12799: /* A Computational Model */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039;, like all forms of potential energy, is the potential for work to be done, in this case by the electric force. The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; (frequently referred to as voltage, from its SI unit, the Volt) is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; associated with the test charge (1 Coulomb), such that it depends only on the source, just as the electric field is related to the electric force, but depends only on the source. One may similarly remember the parallel concept of the gravitational potential, which was gravitational potential energy divided by mass.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined with respect to the [[Electric Force]] &amp;amp; [[Electric Field]]:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} = - q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; from point b to point a&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the charge in the electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the source charge&#039;s electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a differential length along the path from point b to point a&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1150px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Derivation of Electric Potential Energy&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The differential work &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(dW)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; associated with an external force &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{F}_{ext})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moving a charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; from point b to point a &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(d\mathbf{L})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; through an electric field &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{E})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;dW = \mathbf{F}_{ext} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is the vector multiplication of the force moving the charge and the distance the object has moved.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The external force must be equal and opposite to the force associated with the source charge&#039;s electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{F}_{ext} &amp;amp;= - \mathbf{F}_{E} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= - q \mathbf{E}&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;dW = - q \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Integrating from point b to point a along the path gives:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W = -q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, since the work was defined externally, the calculated work is equal to the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} =  -q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricPotentialPaths.png|400px|right|thumb|Some sets of electrically equivalent paths for a charge.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From this, the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; per test charge in the source charge&#039;s electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{U_{ab}}{q} = - \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The electric field is a &#039;&#039;conservative vector field&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:::This means that any path used in the above line integral will give the same value for the same beginning and end points (b and a). Looking at the figure to the right, many paths for a charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; subject to the electric field of source charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are shown. In each set of four paths (Green, Blue, Yellow, and Pink), the same amount of &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is gained or lost. &lt;br /&gt;
*A special case shown in dark green near the bottom right of the figure also exists:&lt;br /&gt;
:::If a charge is moving along a path that is always perpendicular to the electric field, the line integral will evaluate to zero, and therefore the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; will also evaluate to zero.&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is easily shown with the dot product; if two variable vectors are always perpendicular, then their dot product is always zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricPotentialRadial.png|400px|right|thumb|Illustration of radial potential.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; from a source charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(Q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be written in a simpler expression:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr ( \frac{1}{r_{a}} - \frac{1}{r_{b}} \biggr )&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the source charge&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{a}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the final position &lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{b}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the initial position&lt;br /&gt;
:*The initial position is often taken to be infinity (the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined to be zero at infinity) creating a simpler and more familiar looking equation:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} r}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
:::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the distance between the source charge and the charge in the electric field&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is used to described the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; gained or lost when moving a charge radially closer to a source charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:740px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Derivation of Radial Potential&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If a charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is being moved in a source charge&#039;s &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(Q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; electric field &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{E})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; is:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} = - q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric field is known to be described radially as: ([[Electric Field]])&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{Q}{r^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Allow the path be along the radial direction:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d\mathbf{L} = dr \hat{\mathbf{r}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging these in gives:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
U_{ab} &amp;amp;= -q \int_{b}^{a} \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{Q}{r^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}} \cdot \hat{\mathbf{r}} dr \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= -q \int_{b}^{a} \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{Q}{r^2} dr \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= - \frac{qQ}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \int_{b}^{a} \frac{dr}{r^2} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= \frac{qQ}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr [ \frac{1}{r} \biggr ]_{b}^{a} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;=  \frac{qQ}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr ( \frac{1}{r_{a}} - \frac{1}{r_{b}} \biggr ) \\&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore, the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr ( \frac{1}{r_{a}} - \frac{1}{r_{b}} \biggr )&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Critical Formulas&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} = - q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{U_{ab}}{q}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} r}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
Click on the link to see &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; through VPython! Make sure to press &amp;quot;Run&amp;quot; to see the principle in action!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[https://trinket.io/embed/glowscript/0a7e486c94 Teach hand-on with GlowScript]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Watch this video for a more visual approach! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Rb9guSEeVE Electric Potential: Visualizing Voltage with 3D animations]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
===Externals links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Main Idea ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
Click on the link to see Electric Potential through VPython!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Make sure to press &amp;quot;Run&amp;quot; to see the principle in action!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://trinket.io/embed/glowscript/0a7e486c94 Teach hand-on with GlowScript]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Watch this video for a more visual approach! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Rb9guSEeVE Electric Potential: Visualizing Voltage with 3D animations]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--== Models ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric potential of a particle at a point is equal to the potential difference of that particle with respect to infinity. Since we know how to calculate the potential difference using the formula, we can see that this implies that the electric potential at infinity is equal to zero. What does this mean? This means that a particle that is extremely far away has no potential energy. This makes sense, because a proton will not be affected by the electric field of another proton at a distance of infinity apart. This subtle detail aids in solving a case of problems types later on.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although electric potential is an important topic to learn, most problems encountered will not ask to find just the &amp;quot;electric potential,&amp;quot; instead, questions will most likely ask for the &amp;quot;electric potential difference.&amp;quot; This is because electric potential is measured using different locations, or more specifically pathways between the different locations, so instead of determining the electric potential of location A and the electric potential of final location B, it would make more sense to determine the &amp;quot;difference in electric potential between locations A and B.&amp;quot; The following mathematical model will further explain this. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like mentioned before, instead of electric potential, in most cases, electric potential difference is needed to be found. The general equation for the potential difference is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{{U}_{electric}} = {q} * ∆{V} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{{U}_{electric}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric potential energy, which is measured in Joules (J). &#039;&#039;&#039;q&#039;&#039;&#039; is the charge of the particle moving through the path of the electric potential difference, which is measured in coulombs (C). &#039;&#039;&#039;∆V&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric potential difference, which is measured in Joules per Coulomb (J/C), or just Volts (V).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Aside from the general equation, the electric potential difference can also be found in other ways. The potential difference in an &#039;&#039;&#039;uniform field&#039;&#039;&#039; is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{V} = -({E}_{x}∆{x} + {E}_{y}∆{y} + {E}_{z}∆{z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;, which can also be written as &#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{V} = -\vec{E}·∆\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the electric potential difference, which is measured in Joules per Coulomb (J/C), or just Volts (V). &#039;&#039;&#039;E&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric field, which is measured in Newtons per Coulomb (N/C), and it is important to note that the different direction components of the electric field are used in the equation. &#039;&#039;&#039;l&#039;&#039;&#039; (or the &#039;&#039;&#039;x&#039;&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;&#039;y&#039;&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;&#039;z&#039;&#039;&#039;) is the distance between the two described locations, which is measured in meters, and x, y, and z, are the different components of the difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, when working with different situations, it is nice to keep in mind that in a conductor, the electric field is zero. Therefore, the potential difference is zero as well. In an insulator, the electric field is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;{E}_{applied} / K&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; where &#039;&#039;&#039;K&#039;&#039;&#039; is the dielectric constant. Also, the round trip potential difference is always zero, or in other words, if you start from a certain point and end at the same point, then, the potential difference will be zero. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
In a capacitor, the negative charges are located on the left plate, and the positive charges are located on the right plate. Location A is at the left end of the capacitor, and Location B is at the right end of the capacitor, or in other words, Location A and B are only different in terms of their x component location. The path moves from A to B. What is the direction of the electric field? Is the potential difference positive or negative? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ep125.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer: The electric field is to the left. The potential difference is increasing, or is positive.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
The electric field always moves away from the positive charge and towards the negative charge, which means the electric field in this example is to the left. Because the direction and the electric field and the direction of the path are opposite, the potential difference is increasing, or is positive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Calculate the change in electric potential between point A, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(-4, 3,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and B, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(2,-2,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; . The electric field in the location is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; (50,0,0) \; N/C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:EP mid fig.png ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer: -300V&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta\vec{l}= (2,-2,0)\;m - (-4,3,0)\;m = (6,-5,0)\;m &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -({E}_{x}∆{x} + {E}_{y}∆{y} + {E}_{z}∆{z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -(50\; N/C \cdot 6 \;m + 0 \; N/c \cdot -5 \; m + 0\cdot 0)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -300 V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Bohr Model]] of the hydrogen atom treats it as a nucleus of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; +e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; electrons of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; orbiting in circular orbits of specific radii. Calculate the potential difference between two points, one infinitely far away from the nucleus, and the other one Bohr radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; away from the nucleus (don&#039;t worry about substituting in the values). Compute the electric potential energy associated with the electron one Bohr radius away from the nucleus, setting the potential energy at infinity as zero (remember the sign of the charge). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We may compute the electric potential by taking integrating the electric field of a point charge as the radius goes from infinity to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. This integral may be set up as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\int_\infty^{a_0} \vec{E}\cdot\text{d}\vec{l} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \int_\infty^{a_0} \frac{\text{d} r}{r^2} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This may then be solved:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\biggr{(}\frac{1}{r}\biggr{|}_\infty^{a_0} = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
to compute the potential energy, we now multiply by the charge of the electron: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, giving &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -\frac{e^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Depending on what physics or chemistry courses you may have taken before, this may be recognizable as twice the ionization energy of the n=1 orbital. The factor of two is due to the fact that in the Bohr model, the kinetic energy will be exactly half of this potential energy, and will be positive so that the net result is still negative, but with half the magnitude. This understanding of the hydrogen atom gets certain values right, but the reality of the situation is far more complicated. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is this topic connected to something that you are interested in?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am interested in robotic systems and building circuit boards and electrical systems for manufacturing robots. While studying this section in the book, I was able to connect back many of the concepts and calculations back to robotics and the electrical component of automated systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Since high school, I never really understood how to work with the voltmeter and what it measured, and I have always wanted to know, but although this particular wiki page did not go into the details and other branches of electric potential, it led me to find the answers to something I was interested in since high school, the concept of electric potential.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I think electively is really interesting. When I was younger, I participated in this demo where a group of people hold hands and someone touches this special ball full of charge. We all could feel the tingling sensation of the current passing through us. It’s cool to learn the theory behind the supposed magic that occurs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I think it&#039;s very interesting that electric potential can be seen as a property of a space and that we can have further applications using this property.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is it connected to your major?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am a Mechanical Engineering major, so I will be dealing with the electrical components of machines when I work. Therefore, I have to know these certain concepts such as electric potential in order to fully understand how they work and interact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revistionist] As a biochemistry major, electric potential and electric potential difference is not particularly related to my major, but in chemistry classes, we use electrostatic potential maps (electrostatic potential energy maps) that shows the charge distributions throughout a molecule. Although the main use in electric potential is different in physics and biochemistry (where physicists use it identify the effect of the electric field at a location), I still found it interesting as the concept of electric potential (buildup) was being used in quite a different way. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I am a computer science major. Although I deal mostly with software, the hardware aspect is still important. The algorithms that I design run differently on different machines. The time complexity of an algorithm is sometimes useless when worrying about constant factors that are determined by a system’s hardware. Quicksort, for instance, is usually faster than many other sorts that have lower time complexities. The hardware of computers heavily relies on electricity and current (which is induced by a potential difference) to switch transistors on and off and thereby process information. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I am an aerospace engineering major, and I think understanding such concepts will help me have a better holistic understanding towards fields and systems. In addition, the thinking behind solving related problems will help me better prepared for future classes that involve with solving dynamics problems. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Is there an interesting industrial application?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] Electrical potential is used to find the voltage across a path. This is useful when working with circuit components and attempting to manipulate the power output or current throughout a component.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Electric potential sensors are being used to detect a variety of electrical signals made by the human body, thus contributing to the field of electrophysiology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] The study of electric potential has lead scientists to generate very safe wires that will not overheat and cause fires. Connecting circuits to ground is important and the third prong in an electrical outlet is this ground connection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The idea of electric potential, in a way, started with Ben Franklin and his experiments in the 1740s. He began to understand the flow of electricity, which eventually paved the path towards explaining electric potential and potential difference. Scientists finally began to understand how electric fields were actually affecting the charges and the surrounding environment. Benjamin Franklin first shocked himself in 1746, while conducting experiments on electricity with found objects from around his house. Six years later, or 261 years ago for us, the founding father flew a kite attached to a key and a silk ribbon in a thunderstorm and effectively trapped lightning in a jar. The experiment is now seen as a watershed moment in mankind&#039;s venture to channel a force of nature that was viewed quite abstractly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the time Franklin started experimenting with electricity, he&#039;d already found fame and fortune as the author of Poor Richard&#039;s Almanack. Electricity wasn&#039;t a very well understood phenomenon at that point, so Franklin&#039;s research proved to be fairly foundational. The early experiments, experts believe, were inspired by other scientists&#039; work and the shortcomings therein.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ep135.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
source: http://www.benjamin-franklin-history.org/kite-experiment/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That early brush with the dangers of electricity left an impression on Franklin. He described the sensation as &amp;quot;a universal blow throughout my whole body from head to foot, which seemed within as well as without; after which the first thing I took notice of was a violent quick shaking of my body.&amp;quot; However, it didn&#039;t scare him away. In the handful of years before his famous kite experiment, Franklin contributed everything from designing the first battery designs to establishing some common nomenclature in the study of electricity. Although Franklin is often coined the father of electricity, after he set the foundations of electricity, many other scientists contributed his or her research in the advancement of electricity and eventually led to the discovery of electric potential and potential difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like mentioned multiple times throughout the page, although electric potential is a huge and important topic, it has many branches, which makes the concept of electric potential difficult to stand alone. Even with this page, to support the concept of electric potential, many crucial branches of the topic appeared, like potential difference (which also branched into [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_Path_Independence,_claimed_by_Aditya_Mohile Potential Difference Path Independence]], [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_in_a_Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Uniform Field]], and [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_of_Point_Charge_in_a_Non-Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Nonuniform Field]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External Links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] https://www.khanacademy.org/test-prep/mcat/physical-processes/electrostatics-1/v/electric-potential-at-a-point-in-space&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pcWz4tP_zUw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vpa_uApmNoo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] https://www.khanacademy.org/science/electrical-engineering/ee-electrostatics/ee-fields-potential-voltage/a/ee-electric-potential-voltage&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] &amp;quot;Benjamin Franklin and Electricity.&amp;quot; Benjamin Franklin and Electricity. N.p., n.d. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.americaslibrary.gov/aa/franklinb/aa_franklinb_electric_1.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Bottyan, Thomas. &amp;quot;Electrostatic Potential Maps.&amp;quot; Chemwiki. N.p., 02 Oct. 2013. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://chemwiki.ucdavis.edu/Core/Theoretical_Chemistry/Chemical_Bonding/General_Principles_of_Chemical_Bonding/Electrostatic_Potential_maps&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] &amp;quot;Electric Potential Difference.&amp;quot; Electric Potential Difference. The Physics Classroom, n.d. Web. 14 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/circuits/Lesson-1/Electric-Potential-Difference&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] Harland, C. J., T. D. Clark, and R. J. Prance. &amp;quot;Applications of Electric Potential (Displacement Current) Sensors in Human Body Electrophysiology.&amp;quot; International Society for Industrial Process Tomography, n.d. Web. 16 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.isipt.org/world-congress/3/269.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] Sherwood, Bruce A. &amp;quot;2.1 The Momentum Principle.&amp;quot; Matter &amp;amp; Interactions. By Ruth W. Chabay. 4th ed. Vol. 1. N.p.: John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons, 2015. 45-50. Print. Modern Mechanics.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurence12799</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=38815</id>
		<title>Electric Potential</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=38815"/>
		<updated>2020-09-20T18:57:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurence12799: /* The Main Idea */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039;, like all forms of potential energy, is the potential for work to be done, in this case by the electric force. The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; (frequently referred to as voltage, from its SI unit, the Volt) is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; associated with the test charge (1 Coulomb), such that it depends only on the source, just as the electric field is related to the electric force, but depends only on the source. One may similarly remember the parallel concept of the gravitational potential, which was gravitational potential energy divided by mass.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined with respect to the [[Electric Force]] &amp;amp; [[Electric Field]]:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} = - q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; from point b to point a&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the charge in the electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the source charge&#039;s electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a differential length along the path from point b to point a&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1150px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Derivation of Electric Potential Energy&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The differential work &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(dW)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; associated with an external force &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{F}_{ext})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moving a charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; from point b to point a &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(d\mathbf{L})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; through an electric field &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{E})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;dW = \mathbf{F}_{ext} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is the vector multiplication of the force moving the charge and the distance the object has moved.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The external force must be equal and opposite to the force associated with the source charge&#039;s electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{F}_{ext} &amp;amp;= - \mathbf{F}_{E} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= - q \mathbf{E}&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;dW = - q \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Integrating from point b to point a along the path gives:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W = -q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, since the work was defined externally, the calculated work is equal to the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} =  -q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricPotentialPaths.png|400px|right|thumb|Some sets of electrically equivalent paths for a charge.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From this, the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; per test charge in the source charge&#039;s electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{U_{ab}}{q} = - \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The electric field is a &#039;&#039;conservative vector field&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:::This means that any path used in the above line integral will give the same value for the same beginning and end points (b and a). Looking at the figure to the right, many paths for a charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; subject to the electric field of source charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are shown. In each set of four paths (Green, Blue, Yellow, and Pink), the same amount of &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is gained or lost. &lt;br /&gt;
*A special case shown in dark green near the bottom right of the figure also exists:&lt;br /&gt;
:::If a charge is moving along a path that is always perpendicular to the electric field, the line integral will evaluate to zero, and therefore the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; will also evaluate to zero.&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is easily shown with the dot product; if two variable vectors are always perpendicular, then their dot product is always zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricPotentialRadial.png|400px|right|thumb|Illustration of radial potential.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; from a source charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(Q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be written in a simpler expression:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr ( \frac{1}{r_{a}} - \frac{1}{r_{b}} \biggr )&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the source charge&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{a}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the final position &lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{b}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the initial position&lt;br /&gt;
:*The initial position is often taken to be infinity (the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined to be zero at infinity) creating a simpler and more familiar looking equation:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} r}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
:::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the distance between the source charge and the charge in the electric field&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is used to described the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; gained or lost when moving a charge radially closer to a source charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:740px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Derivation of Radial Potential&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If a charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is being moved in a source charge&#039;s &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(Q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; electric field &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{E})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; is:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} = - q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric field is known to be described radially as: ([[Electric Field]])&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{Q}{r^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Allow the path be along the radial direction:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d\mathbf{L} = dr \hat{\mathbf{r}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging these in gives:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
U_{ab} &amp;amp;= -q \int_{b}^{a} \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{Q}{r^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}} \cdot \hat{\mathbf{r}} dr \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= -q \int_{b}^{a} \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{Q}{r^2} dr \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= - \frac{qQ}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \int_{b}^{a} \frac{dr}{r^2} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= \frac{qQ}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr [ \frac{1}{r} \biggr ]_{b}^{a} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;=  \frac{qQ}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr ( \frac{1}{r_{a}} - \frac{1}{r_{b}} \biggr ) \\&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore, the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr ( \frac{1}{r_{a}} - \frac{1}{r_{b}} \biggr )&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Critical Formulas&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} = - q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{U_{ab}}{q}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} r}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
===Externals links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Main Idea ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
Click on the link to see Electric Potential through VPython!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Make sure to press &amp;quot;Run&amp;quot; to see the principle in action!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://trinket.io/embed/glowscript/0a7e486c94 Teach hand-on with GlowScript]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Watch this video for a more visual approach! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Rb9guSEeVE Electric Potential: Visualizing Voltage with 3D animations]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--== Models ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric potential of a particle at a point is equal to the potential difference of that particle with respect to infinity. Since we know how to calculate the potential difference using the formula, we can see that this implies that the electric potential at infinity is equal to zero. What does this mean? This means that a particle that is extremely far away has no potential energy. This makes sense, because a proton will not be affected by the electric field of another proton at a distance of infinity apart. This subtle detail aids in solving a case of problems types later on.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although electric potential is an important topic to learn, most problems encountered will not ask to find just the &amp;quot;electric potential,&amp;quot; instead, questions will most likely ask for the &amp;quot;electric potential difference.&amp;quot; This is because electric potential is measured using different locations, or more specifically pathways between the different locations, so instead of determining the electric potential of location A and the electric potential of final location B, it would make more sense to determine the &amp;quot;difference in electric potential between locations A and B.&amp;quot; The following mathematical model will further explain this. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like mentioned before, instead of electric potential, in most cases, electric potential difference is needed to be found. The general equation for the potential difference is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{{U}_{electric}} = {q} * ∆{V} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{{U}_{electric}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric potential energy, which is measured in Joules (J). &#039;&#039;&#039;q&#039;&#039;&#039; is the charge of the particle moving through the path of the electric potential difference, which is measured in coulombs (C). &#039;&#039;&#039;∆V&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric potential difference, which is measured in Joules per Coulomb (J/C), or just Volts (V).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Aside from the general equation, the electric potential difference can also be found in other ways. The potential difference in an &#039;&#039;&#039;uniform field&#039;&#039;&#039; is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{V} = -({E}_{x}∆{x} + {E}_{y}∆{y} + {E}_{z}∆{z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;, which can also be written as &#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{V} = -\vec{E}·∆\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the electric potential difference, which is measured in Joules per Coulomb (J/C), or just Volts (V). &#039;&#039;&#039;E&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric field, which is measured in Newtons per Coulomb (N/C), and it is important to note that the different direction components of the electric field are used in the equation. &#039;&#039;&#039;l&#039;&#039;&#039; (or the &#039;&#039;&#039;x&#039;&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;&#039;y&#039;&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;&#039;z&#039;&#039;&#039;) is the distance between the two described locations, which is measured in meters, and x, y, and z, are the different components of the difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, when working with different situations, it is nice to keep in mind that in a conductor, the electric field is zero. Therefore, the potential difference is zero as well. In an insulator, the electric field is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;{E}_{applied} / K&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; where &#039;&#039;&#039;K&#039;&#039;&#039; is the dielectric constant. Also, the round trip potential difference is always zero, or in other words, if you start from a certain point and end at the same point, then, the potential difference will be zero. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
In a capacitor, the negative charges are located on the left plate, and the positive charges are located on the right plate. Location A is at the left end of the capacitor, and Location B is at the right end of the capacitor, or in other words, Location A and B are only different in terms of their x component location. The path moves from A to B. What is the direction of the electric field? Is the potential difference positive or negative? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ep125.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer: The electric field is to the left. The potential difference is increasing, or is positive.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
The electric field always moves away from the positive charge and towards the negative charge, which means the electric field in this example is to the left. Because the direction and the electric field and the direction of the path are opposite, the potential difference is increasing, or is positive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Calculate the change in electric potential between point A, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(-4, 3,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and B, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(2,-2,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; . The electric field in the location is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; (50,0,0) \; N/C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:EP mid fig.png ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer: -300V&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta\vec{l}= (2,-2,0)\;m - (-4,3,0)\;m = (6,-5,0)\;m &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -({E}_{x}∆{x} + {E}_{y}∆{y} + {E}_{z}∆{z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -(50\; N/C \cdot 6 \;m + 0 \; N/c \cdot -5 \; m + 0\cdot 0)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -300 V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Bohr Model]] of the hydrogen atom treats it as a nucleus of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; +e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; electrons of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; orbiting in circular orbits of specific radii. Calculate the potential difference between two points, one infinitely far away from the nucleus, and the other one Bohr radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; away from the nucleus (don&#039;t worry about substituting in the values). Compute the electric potential energy associated with the electron one Bohr radius away from the nucleus, setting the potential energy at infinity as zero (remember the sign of the charge). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We may compute the electric potential by taking integrating the electric field of a point charge as the radius goes from infinity to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. This integral may be set up as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\int_\infty^{a_0} \vec{E}\cdot\text{d}\vec{l} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \int_\infty^{a_0} \frac{\text{d} r}{r^2} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This may then be solved:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\biggr{(}\frac{1}{r}\biggr{|}_\infty^{a_0} = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
to compute the potential energy, we now multiply by the charge of the electron: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, giving &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -\frac{e^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Depending on what physics or chemistry courses you may have taken before, this may be recognizable as twice the ionization energy of the n=1 orbital. The factor of two is due to the fact that in the Bohr model, the kinetic energy will be exactly half of this potential energy, and will be positive so that the net result is still negative, but with half the magnitude. This understanding of the hydrogen atom gets certain values right, but the reality of the situation is far more complicated. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is this topic connected to something that you are interested in?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am interested in robotic systems and building circuit boards and electrical systems for manufacturing robots. While studying this section in the book, I was able to connect back many of the concepts and calculations back to robotics and the electrical component of automated systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Since high school, I never really understood how to work with the voltmeter and what it measured, and I have always wanted to know, but although this particular wiki page did not go into the details and other branches of electric potential, it led me to find the answers to something I was interested in since high school, the concept of electric potential.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I think electively is really interesting. When I was younger, I participated in this demo where a group of people hold hands and someone touches this special ball full of charge. We all could feel the tingling sensation of the current passing through us. It’s cool to learn the theory behind the supposed magic that occurs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I think it&#039;s very interesting that electric potential can be seen as a property of a space and that we can have further applications using this property.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is it connected to your major?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am a Mechanical Engineering major, so I will be dealing with the electrical components of machines when I work. Therefore, I have to know these certain concepts such as electric potential in order to fully understand how they work and interact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revistionist] As a biochemistry major, electric potential and electric potential difference is not particularly related to my major, but in chemistry classes, we use electrostatic potential maps (electrostatic potential energy maps) that shows the charge distributions throughout a molecule. Although the main use in electric potential is different in physics and biochemistry (where physicists use it identify the effect of the electric field at a location), I still found it interesting as the concept of electric potential (buildup) was being used in quite a different way. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I am a computer science major. Although I deal mostly with software, the hardware aspect is still important. The algorithms that I design run differently on different machines. The time complexity of an algorithm is sometimes useless when worrying about constant factors that are determined by a system’s hardware. Quicksort, for instance, is usually faster than many other sorts that have lower time complexities. The hardware of computers heavily relies on electricity and current (which is induced by a potential difference) to switch transistors on and off and thereby process information. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I am an aerospace engineering major, and I think understanding such concepts will help me have a better holistic understanding towards fields and systems. In addition, the thinking behind solving related problems will help me better prepared for future classes that involve with solving dynamics problems. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Is there an interesting industrial application?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] Electrical potential is used to find the voltage across a path. This is useful when working with circuit components and attempting to manipulate the power output or current throughout a component.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Electric potential sensors are being used to detect a variety of electrical signals made by the human body, thus contributing to the field of electrophysiology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] The study of electric potential has lead scientists to generate very safe wires that will not overheat and cause fires. Connecting circuits to ground is important and the third prong in an electrical outlet is this ground connection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The idea of electric potential, in a way, started with Ben Franklin and his experiments in the 1740s. He began to understand the flow of electricity, which eventually paved the path towards explaining electric potential and potential difference. Scientists finally began to understand how electric fields were actually affecting the charges and the surrounding environment. Benjamin Franklin first shocked himself in 1746, while conducting experiments on electricity with found objects from around his house. Six years later, or 261 years ago for us, the founding father flew a kite attached to a key and a silk ribbon in a thunderstorm and effectively trapped lightning in a jar. The experiment is now seen as a watershed moment in mankind&#039;s venture to channel a force of nature that was viewed quite abstractly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the time Franklin started experimenting with electricity, he&#039;d already found fame and fortune as the author of Poor Richard&#039;s Almanack. Electricity wasn&#039;t a very well understood phenomenon at that point, so Franklin&#039;s research proved to be fairly foundational. The early experiments, experts believe, were inspired by other scientists&#039; work and the shortcomings therein.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ep135.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
source: http://www.benjamin-franklin-history.org/kite-experiment/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That early brush with the dangers of electricity left an impression on Franklin. He described the sensation as &amp;quot;a universal blow throughout my whole body from head to foot, which seemed within as well as without; after which the first thing I took notice of was a violent quick shaking of my body.&amp;quot; However, it didn&#039;t scare him away. In the handful of years before his famous kite experiment, Franklin contributed everything from designing the first battery designs to establishing some common nomenclature in the study of electricity. Although Franklin is often coined the father of electricity, after he set the foundations of electricity, many other scientists contributed his or her research in the advancement of electricity and eventually led to the discovery of electric potential and potential difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like mentioned multiple times throughout the page, although electric potential is a huge and important topic, it has many branches, which makes the concept of electric potential difficult to stand alone. Even with this page, to support the concept of electric potential, many crucial branches of the topic appeared, like potential difference (which also branched into [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_Path_Independence,_claimed_by_Aditya_Mohile Potential Difference Path Independence]], [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_in_a_Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Uniform Field]], and [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_of_Point_Charge_in_a_Non-Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Nonuniform Field]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External Links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] https://www.khanacademy.org/test-prep/mcat/physical-processes/electrostatics-1/v/electric-potential-at-a-point-in-space&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pcWz4tP_zUw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vpa_uApmNoo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] https://www.khanacademy.org/science/electrical-engineering/ee-electrostatics/ee-fields-potential-voltage/a/ee-electric-potential-voltage&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] &amp;quot;Benjamin Franklin and Electricity.&amp;quot; Benjamin Franklin and Electricity. N.p., n.d. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.americaslibrary.gov/aa/franklinb/aa_franklinb_electric_1.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Bottyan, Thomas. &amp;quot;Electrostatic Potential Maps.&amp;quot; Chemwiki. N.p., 02 Oct. 2013. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://chemwiki.ucdavis.edu/Core/Theoretical_Chemistry/Chemical_Bonding/General_Principles_of_Chemical_Bonding/Electrostatic_Potential_maps&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] &amp;quot;Electric Potential Difference.&amp;quot; Electric Potential Difference. The Physics Classroom, n.d. Web. 14 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/circuits/Lesson-1/Electric-Potential-Difference&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] Harland, C. J., T. D. Clark, and R. J. Prance. &amp;quot;Applications of Electric Potential (Displacement Current) Sensors in Human Body Electrophysiology.&amp;quot; International Society for Industrial Process Tomography, n.d. Web. 16 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.isipt.org/world-congress/3/269.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] Sherwood, Bruce A. &amp;quot;2.1 The Momentum Principle.&amp;quot; Matter &amp;amp; Interactions. By Ruth W. Chabay. 4th ed. Vol. 1. N.p.: John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons, 2015. 45-50. Print. Modern Mechanics.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurence12799</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=38814</id>
		<title>Electric Potential</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=38814"/>
		<updated>2020-09-20T18:56:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurence12799: /* Mathematical Model */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039;, like all forms of potential energy, is the potential for work to be done, in this case by the electric force. The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; (frequently referred to as voltage, from its SI unit, the Volt) is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; associated with the test charge (1 Coulomb), such that it depends only on the source, just as the electric field is related to the electric force, but depends only on the source. One may similarly remember the parallel concept of the gravitational potential, which was gravitational potential energy divided by mass.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined with respect to the [[Electric Force]] &amp;amp; [[Electric Field]]:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} = - q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; from point b to point a&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the charge in the electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the source charge&#039;s electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a differential length along the path from point b to point a&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1150px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Derivation of Electric Potential Energy&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The differential work &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(dW)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; associated with an external force &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{F}_{ext})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moving a charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; from point b to point a &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(d\mathbf{L})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; through an electric field &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{E})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;dW = \mathbf{F}_{ext} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is the vector multiplication of the force moving the charge and the distance the object has moved.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The external force must be equal and opposite to the force associated with the source charge&#039;s electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{F}_{ext} &amp;amp;= - \mathbf{F}_{E} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= - q \mathbf{E}&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;dW = - q \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Integrating from point b to point a along the path gives:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W = -q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, since the work was defined externally, the calculated work is equal to the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} =  -q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricPotentialPaths.png|400px|right|thumb|Some sets of electrically equivalent paths for a charge.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From this, the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; per test charge in the source charge&#039;s electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{U_{ab}}{q} = - \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The electric field is a &#039;&#039;conservative vector field&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:::This means that any path used in the above line integral will give the same value for the same beginning and end points (b and a). Looking at the figure to the right, many paths for a charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; subject to the electric field of source charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are shown. In each set of four paths (Green, Blue, Yellow, and Pink), the same amount of &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is gained or lost. &lt;br /&gt;
*A special case shown in dark green near the bottom right of the figure also exists:&lt;br /&gt;
:::If a charge is moving along a path that is always perpendicular to the electric field, the line integral will evaluate to zero, and therefore the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; will also evaluate to zero.&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is easily shown with the dot product; if two variable vectors are always perpendicular, then their dot product is always zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricPotentialRadial.png|400px|right|thumb|Illustration of radial potential.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; from a source charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(Q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be written in a simpler expression:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr ( \frac{1}{r_{a}} - \frac{1}{r_{b}} \biggr )&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the source charge&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{a}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the final position &lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{b}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the initial position&lt;br /&gt;
:*The initial position is often taken to be infinity (the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined to be zero at infinity) creating a simpler and more familiar looking equation:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} r}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
:::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the distance between the source charge and the charge in the electric field&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is used to described the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; gained or lost when moving a charge radially closer to a source charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:740px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Derivation of Radial Potential&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If a charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is being moved in a source charge&#039;s &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(Q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; electric field &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{E})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; is:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} = - q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric field is known to be described radially as: ([[Electric Field]])&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{Q}{r^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Allow the path be along the radial direction:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d\mathbf{L} = dr \hat{\mathbf{r}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging these in gives:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
U_{ab} &amp;amp;= -q \int_{b}^{a} \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{Q}{r^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}} \cdot \hat{\mathbf{r}} dr \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= -q \int_{b}^{a} \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{Q}{r^2} dr \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= - \frac{qQ}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \int_{b}^{a} \frac{dr}{r^2} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= \frac{qQ}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr [ \frac{1}{r} \biggr ]_{b}^{a} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;=  \frac{qQ}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr ( \frac{1}{r_{a}} - \frac{1}{r_{b}} \biggr ) \\&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore, the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr ( \frac{1}{r_{a}} - \frac{1}{r_{b}} \biggr )&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Critical Formulas&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} = - q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{U_{ab}}{q}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} r}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
===Externals links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Main Idea ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electric potential energy, like all forms of potential energy, is the potential for work to be done, in this case by the electric force. The electric potential (frequently referred to as voltage, from its SI unit the Volt) is the electric potential energy associated with the test charge, such that it depends only on the source, just as the electric field is related to the electric force, but depends only on the source. One may similarly remember the parallel concept of the gravitational potential, which was gravitational potential energy divided by mass.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
Click on the link to see Electric Potential through VPython!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Make sure to press &amp;quot;Run&amp;quot; to see the principle in action!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://trinket.io/embed/glowscript/0a7e486c94 Teach hand-on with GlowScript]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Watch this video for a more visual approach! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Rb9guSEeVE Electric Potential: Visualizing Voltage with 3D animations]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--== Models ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric potential of a particle at a point is equal to the potential difference of that particle with respect to infinity. Since we know how to calculate the potential difference using the formula, we can see that this implies that the electric potential at infinity is equal to zero. What does this mean? This means that a particle that is extremely far away has no potential energy. This makes sense, because a proton will not be affected by the electric field of another proton at a distance of infinity apart. This subtle detail aids in solving a case of problems types later on.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although electric potential is an important topic to learn, most problems encountered will not ask to find just the &amp;quot;electric potential,&amp;quot; instead, questions will most likely ask for the &amp;quot;electric potential difference.&amp;quot; This is because electric potential is measured using different locations, or more specifically pathways between the different locations, so instead of determining the electric potential of location A and the electric potential of final location B, it would make more sense to determine the &amp;quot;difference in electric potential between locations A and B.&amp;quot; The following mathematical model will further explain this. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like mentioned before, instead of electric potential, in most cases, electric potential difference is needed to be found. The general equation for the potential difference is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{{U}_{electric}} = {q} * ∆{V} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{{U}_{electric}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric potential energy, which is measured in Joules (J). &#039;&#039;&#039;q&#039;&#039;&#039; is the charge of the particle moving through the path of the electric potential difference, which is measured in coulombs (C). &#039;&#039;&#039;∆V&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric potential difference, which is measured in Joules per Coulomb (J/C), or just Volts (V).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Aside from the general equation, the electric potential difference can also be found in other ways. The potential difference in an &#039;&#039;&#039;uniform field&#039;&#039;&#039; is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{V} = -({E}_{x}∆{x} + {E}_{y}∆{y} + {E}_{z}∆{z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;, which can also be written as &#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{V} = -\vec{E}·∆\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the electric potential difference, which is measured in Joules per Coulomb (J/C), or just Volts (V). &#039;&#039;&#039;E&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric field, which is measured in Newtons per Coulomb (N/C), and it is important to note that the different direction components of the electric field are used in the equation. &#039;&#039;&#039;l&#039;&#039;&#039; (or the &#039;&#039;&#039;x&#039;&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;&#039;y&#039;&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;&#039;z&#039;&#039;&#039;) is the distance between the two described locations, which is measured in meters, and x, y, and z, are the different components of the difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, when working with different situations, it is nice to keep in mind that in a conductor, the electric field is zero. Therefore, the potential difference is zero as well. In an insulator, the electric field is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;{E}_{applied} / K&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; where &#039;&#039;&#039;K&#039;&#039;&#039; is the dielectric constant. Also, the round trip potential difference is always zero, or in other words, if you start from a certain point and end at the same point, then, the potential difference will be zero. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
In a capacitor, the negative charges are located on the left plate, and the positive charges are located on the right plate. Location A is at the left end of the capacitor, and Location B is at the right end of the capacitor, or in other words, Location A and B are only different in terms of their x component location. The path moves from A to B. What is the direction of the electric field? Is the potential difference positive or negative? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ep125.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer: The electric field is to the left. The potential difference is increasing, or is positive.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
The electric field always moves away from the positive charge and towards the negative charge, which means the electric field in this example is to the left. Because the direction and the electric field and the direction of the path are opposite, the potential difference is increasing, or is positive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Calculate the change in electric potential between point A, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(-4, 3,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and B, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(2,-2,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; . The electric field in the location is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; (50,0,0) \; N/C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:EP mid fig.png ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer: -300V&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta\vec{l}= (2,-2,0)\;m - (-4,3,0)\;m = (6,-5,0)\;m &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -({E}_{x}∆{x} + {E}_{y}∆{y} + {E}_{z}∆{z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -(50\; N/C \cdot 6 \;m + 0 \; N/c \cdot -5 \; m + 0\cdot 0)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -300 V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Bohr Model]] of the hydrogen atom treats it as a nucleus of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; +e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; electrons of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; orbiting in circular orbits of specific radii. Calculate the potential difference between two points, one infinitely far away from the nucleus, and the other one Bohr radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; away from the nucleus (don&#039;t worry about substituting in the values). Compute the electric potential energy associated with the electron one Bohr radius away from the nucleus, setting the potential energy at infinity as zero (remember the sign of the charge). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We may compute the electric potential by taking integrating the electric field of a point charge as the radius goes from infinity to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. This integral may be set up as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\int_\infty^{a_0} \vec{E}\cdot\text{d}\vec{l} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \int_\infty^{a_0} \frac{\text{d} r}{r^2} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This may then be solved:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\biggr{(}\frac{1}{r}\biggr{|}_\infty^{a_0} = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
to compute the potential energy, we now multiply by the charge of the electron: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, giving &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -\frac{e^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Depending on what physics or chemistry courses you may have taken before, this may be recognizable as twice the ionization energy of the n=1 orbital. The factor of two is due to the fact that in the Bohr model, the kinetic energy will be exactly half of this potential energy, and will be positive so that the net result is still negative, but with half the magnitude. This understanding of the hydrogen atom gets certain values right, but the reality of the situation is far more complicated. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is this topic connected to something that you are interested in?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am interested in robotic systems and building circuit boards and electrical systems for manufacturing robots. While studying this section in the book, I was able to connect back many of the concepts and calculations back to robotics and the electrical component of automated systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Since high school, I never really understood how to work with the voltmeter and what it measured, and I have always wanted to know, but although this particular wiki page did not go into the details and other branches of electric potential, it led me to find the answers to something I was interested in since high school, the concept of electric potential.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I think electively is really interesting. When I was younger, I participated in this demo where a group of people hold hands and someone touches this special ball full of charge. We all could feel the tingling sensation of the current passing through us. It’s cool to learn the theory behind the supposed magic that occurs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I think it&#039;s very interesting that electric potential can be seen as a property of a space and that we can have further applications using this property.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is it connected to your major?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am a Mechanical Engineering major, so I will be dealing with the electrical components of machines when I work. Therefore, I have to know these certain concepts such as electric potential in order to fully understand how they work and interact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revistionist] As a biochemistry major, electric potential and electric potential difference is not particularly related to my major, but in chemistry classes, we use electrostatic potential maps (electrostatic potential energy maps) that shows the charge distributions throughout a molecule. Although the main use in electric potential is different in physics and biochemistry (where physicists use it identify the effect of the electric field at a location), I still found it interesting as the concept of electric potential (buildup) was being used in quite a different way. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I am a computer science major. Although I deal mostly with software, the hardware aspect is still important. The algorithms that I design run differently on different machines. The time complexity of an algorithm is sometimes useless when worrying about constant factors that are determined by a system’s hardware. Quicksort, for instance, is usually faster than many other sorts that have lower time complexities. The hardware of computers heavily relies on electricity and current (which is induced by a potential difference) to switch transistors on and off and thereby process information. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I am an aerospace engineering major, and I think understanding such concepts will help me have a better holistic understanding towards fields and systems. In addition, the thinking behind solving related problems will help me better prepared for future classes that involve with solving dynamics problems. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Is there an interesting industrial application?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] Electrical potential is used to find the voltage across a path. This is useful when working with circuit components and attempting to manipulate the power output or current throughout a component.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Electric potential sensors are being used to detect a variety of electrical signals made by the human body, thus contributing to the field of electrophysiology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] The study of electric potential has lead scientists to generate very safe wires that will not overheat and cause fires. Connecting circuits to ground is important and the third prong in an electrical outlet is this ground connection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The idea of electric potential, in a way, started with Ben Franklin and his experiments in the 1740s. He began to understand the flow of electricity, which eventually paved the path towards explaining electric potential and potential difference. Scientists finally began to understand how electric fields were actually affecting the charges and the surrounding environment. Benjamin Franklin first shocked himself in 1746, while conducting experiments on electricity with found objects from around his house. Six years later, or 261 years ago for us, the founding father flew a kite attached to a key and a silk ribbon in a thunderstorm and effectively trapped lightning in a jar. The experiment is now seen as a watershed moment in mankind&#039;s venture to channel a force of nature that was viewed quite abstractly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the time Franklin started experimenting with electricity, he&#039;d already found fame and fortune as the author of Poor Richard&#039;s Almanack. Electricity wasn&#039;t a very well understood phenomenon at that point, so Franklin&#039;s research proved to be fairly foundational. The early experiments, experts believe, were inspired by other scientists&#039; work and the shortcomings therein.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ep135.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
source: http://www.benjamin-franklin-history.org/kite-experiment/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That early brush with the dangers of electricity left an impression on Franklin. He described the sensation as &amp;quot;a universal blow throughout my whole body from head to foot, which seemed within as well as without; after which the first thing I took notice of was a violent quick shaking of my body.&amp;quot; However, it didn&#039;t scare him away. In the handful of years before his famous kite experiment, Franklin contributed everything from designing the first battery designs to establishing some common nomenclature in the study of electricity. Although Franklin is often coined the father of electricity, after he set the foundations of electricity, many other scientists contributed his or her research in the advancement of electricity and eventually led to the discovery of electric potential and potential difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like mentioned multiple times throughout the page, although electric potential is a huge and important topic, it has many branches, which makes the concept of electric potential difficult to stand alone. Even with this page, to support the concept of electric potential, many crucial branches of the topic appeared, like potential difference (which also branched into [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_Path_Independence,_claimed_by_Aditya_Mohile Potential Difference Path Independence]], [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_in_a_Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Uniform Field]], and [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_of_Point_Charge_in_a_Non-Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Nonuniform Field]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External Links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] https://www.khanacademy.org/test-prep/mcat/physical-processes/electrostatics-1/v/electric-potential-at-a-point-in-space&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pcWz4tP_zUw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vpa_uApmNoo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] https://www.khanacademy.org/science/electrical-engineering/ee-electrostatics/ee-fields-potential-voltage/a/ee-electric-potential-voltage&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] &amp;quot;Benjamin Franklin and Electricity.&amp;quot; Benjamin Franklin and Electricity. N.p., n.d. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.americaslibrary.gov/aa/franklinb/aa_franklinb_electric_1.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Bottyan, Thomas. &amp;quot;Electrostatic Potential Maps.&amp;quot; Chemwiki. N.p., 02 Oct. 2013. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://chemwiki.ucdavis.edu/Core/Theoretical_Chemistry/Chemical_Bonding/General_Principles_of_Chemical_Bonding/Electrostatic_Potential_maps&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] &amp;quot;Electric Potential Difference.&amp;quot; Electric Potential Difference. The Physics Classroom, n.d. Web. 14 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/circuits/Lesson-1/Electric-Potential-Difference&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] Harland, C. J., T. D. Clark, and R. J. Prance. &amp;quot;Applications of Electric Potential (Displacement Current) Sensors in Human Body Electrophysiology.&amp;quot; International Society for Industrial Process Tomography, n.d. Web. 16 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.isipt.org/world-congress/3/269.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] Sherwood, Bruce A. &amp;quot;2.1 The Momentum Principle.&amp;quot; Matter &amp;amp; Interactions. By Ruth W. Chabay. 4th ed. Vol. 1. N.p.: John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons, 2015. 45-50. Print. Modern Mechanics.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurence12799</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=File:Derivativelogo.png&amp;diff=38808</id>
		<title>File:Derivativelogo.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=File:Derivativelogo.png&amp;diff=38808"/>
		<updated>2020-07-09T18:10:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurence12799: Laurence12799 uploaded a new version of &amp;amp;quot;File:Derivativelogo.png&amp;amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurence12799</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=File:Derivativelogo.png&amp;diff=38807</id>
		<title>File:Derivativelogo.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=File:Derivativelogo.png&amp;diff=38807"/>
		<updated>2020-07-09T17:51:33Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurence12799: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurence12799</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=38637</id>
		<title>Electric Potential</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=38637"/>
		<updated>2020-03-24T21:57:32Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurence12799: /* A Mathematical Model */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039;, like all forms of potential energy, is the potential for work to be done, in this case by the electric force. The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; (frequently referred to as voltage, from its SI unit, the Volt) is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; associated with the test charge (1 Coulomb), such that it depends only on the source, just as the electric field is related to the electric force, but depends only on the source. One may similarly remember the parallel concept of the gravitational potential, which was gravitational potential energy divided by mass.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined with respect to the [[Electric Force]] &amp;amp; [[Electric Field]]:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} = - q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; from point b to point a&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the charge in the electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the source charge&#039;s electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a differential length along the path from point b to point a&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1150px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Derivation of Electric Potential Energy&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The differential work &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(dW)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; associated with an external force &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{F}_{ext})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moving a charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; from point b to point a &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(d\mathbf{L})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; through an electric field &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{E})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;dW = \mathbf{F}_{ext} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is the vector multiplication of the force moving the charge and the distance the object has moved.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The external force must be equal and opposite to the force associated with the source charge&#039;s electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{F}_{ext} &amp;amp;= - \mathbf{F}_{E} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= - q \mathbf{E}&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;dW = - q \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Integrating from point b to point a along the path gives:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W = -q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, since the work was defined externally, the calculated work is equal to the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} =  -q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricPotentialPaths.png|400px|right|thumb|Some sets of electrically equivalent paths for a charge.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From this, the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; per test charge in the source charge&#039;s electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{U_{ab}}{q} = - \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The electric field is a &#039;&#039;conservative vector field&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:::This means that any path used in the above line integral will give the same value for the same beginning and end points (b and a). Looking at the figure to the right, many paths for a charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; subject to the electric field of source charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are shown. In each set of four paths (Green, Blue, Yellow, and Pink), the same amount of &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is gained or lost. &lt;br /&gt;
*A special case shown in dark green near the bottom right of the figure also exists:&lt;br /&gt;
:::If a charge is moving along a path that is always perpendicular to the electric field, the line integral will evaluate to zero, and therefore the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; will also evaluate to zero.&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is easily shown with the dot product; if two variable vectors are always perpendicular, then their dot product is always zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricPotentialRadial.png|400px|right|thumb|Illustration of radial potential.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; from a source charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(Q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be written in a simpler expression:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr ( \frac{1}{r_{a}} - \frac{1}{r_{b}} \biggr )&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the source charge&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{a}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the final position &lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{b}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the initial position&lt;br /&gt;
:*The initial position is often taken to be infinity (the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined to be zero at infinity) creating a simpler and more familiar looking equation:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} r}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
:::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the distance between the source charge and the charge in the electric field&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is used to described the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; gained or lost when moving a charge radially closer to a source charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:740px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Derivation of Radial Potential&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If a charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is being moved in a source charge&#039;s &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(Q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; electric field &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{E})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; is:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} = - q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric field is known to be described radially as: ([[Electric Field]])&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{Q}{r^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Allow the path be along the radial direction:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d\mathbf{L} = dr \hat{\mathbf{r}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging these in gives:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
U_{ab} &amp;amp;= -q \int_{b}^{a} \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{Q}{r^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}} \cdot \hat{\mathbf{r}} dr \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= -q \int_{b}^{a} \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{Q}{r^2} dr \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= - \frac{qQ}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \int_{b}^{a} \frac{dr}{r^2} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= \frac{qQ}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr [ \frac{1}{r} \biggr ]_{b}^{a} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;=  \frac{qQ}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr ( \frac{1}{r_{a}} - \frac{1}{r_{b}} \biggr ) \\&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore, the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr ( \frac{1}{r_{a}} - \frac{1}{r_{b}} \biggr )&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Critical Formulas&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} = - q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{U_{ab}}{q}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} r}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
===Externals links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Main Idea ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electric potential energy, like all forms of potential energy, is the potential for work to be done, in this case by the electric force. The electric potential (frequently referred to as voltage, from its SI unit the Volt) is the electric potential energy associated with the test charge, such that it depends only on the source, just as the electric field is related to the electric force, but depends only on the source. One may similarly remember the parallel concept of the gravitational potential, which was gravitational potential energy divided by mass.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
====Electric Potential Energy====&lt;br /&gt;
Electric potential energy may be calculated in a variety of manners, depending upon the situation. The electric potential energy between two point charges may be written in a form which follows directly from the definition of the Coulomb force:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = \frac{qQ}{4\pi\epsilon_0 r_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is the amount of energy which would be required to bring one of the charged objects (by convention the small &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; q &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; charge) from an infinite distance to its current position, where, by convention, the potential energy at infinity is equal to zero. This may, therefore, be derived from the equation for work:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Derivation with Calculus=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -W = -\int_\infty^{r_0} \vec{F}_E(r) \cdot \text{d} \vec{r} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -\int_\infty^{r_0} \frac{qQ \hat{r}}{4\pi\epsilon_0 r^2} \cdot \text{d} \vec{r} = -\frac{qQ}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\int_\infty^{r_0} \frac{\hat{r} \cdot \hat{r}}{r^2} \text{d} r &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = \frac{qQ}{4\pi \epsilon_0} \biggr{(} \frac{1}{r} \biggr{|}_{\infty}^{r_0} = \frac{qQ}{4\pi \epsilon_0 r_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Given our definition of the [[Electric Field]], we have that &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vec{F}_E(r) = q\vec{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
so the electric potential energy may be generally written as &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -q\int_a^b \vec{E} \cdot \text{d} \vec{r} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Linear assumption=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the above equation, one can see that if the electric field is constant over the length of the path, then electric potential energy may be written in a simplified manner as&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = q\vec{E}\cdot\Delta \vec{s} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Electric Potential====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just as we divided by charge to go from electric force to electric field, dividing by charge takes us from the electric potential energy to the electric potential. For a test particle of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; q &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we define &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; V = \frac{U}{q} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Derivation with Calculus=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is not especially meaningful without choosing a reference point, just as for potential energy. Thus, one may speak of the potential difference between two points, which is independent of the reference value. From the above definition of electric potential energy, it is possible to derive an expression for the potential difference between two points from the electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\int_a^b \vec{E} \cdot \text{d} \vec{s} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The vectors are used to express the path associated with this integral. The difference in electric potential will be the same no matter what path one takes, as explored in [[Path Independence of Electric Potential]]. This also allows one to write the inverse relationship, determining the electric field at a given point from the electric potential in one and three dimensions respectively:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; E = -\frac{\text{d}V}{\text{d}x}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vec{E} = -\nabla V &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \nabla &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the gradient operator.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Linear Assumption=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The above equations allow us to write the equivalent expressions under an assumption of constant values for the electric field, such that the integral reduces to &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\vec{E} \cdot \Delta \vec{l} = -(E_x \Delta x + E_y \Delta y + E_z \Delta z)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This also leads directly to the inverse expression:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vec{E} = -(\frac{\Delta V_x}{\Delta x} + \frac{\Delta V_y}{\Delta y} + \frac{\Delta V_z}{\Delta z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric potential difference in a field which is nonuniform, but whose variations are discrete, is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\sum \vec{E}\cdot \Delta\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The different parts in this particular equation resembles the equation for the potential difference in an uniform field, except that with the nonuniform field, the potential difference in the different fields are summed up. This situation can be quite easy, but when the system gets difficult, first, choose a path and divide it into smaller pieces of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;; second, write an expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -\vec{E}\cdot\Delta\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of one piece; third, add up the contributions of all the pieces; last, check the result to make sure the magnitude, direction, and units make sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is important to keep track of the sign differences. If the path follows the direction of the electric field, the sign of the potential difference will be negative. This may be imagined as dropping a positive test charge in an electric field: a positive charge will be accelerated in the direction of the field, meaning that it is gaining energy, and so its potential must be decreasing. By contrast, if the path is opposite the direction of the field, potential will be increasing, much like rolling a boulder up a hill. If the path is perpendicular to the direction of the electric field, the dot product will be equal to zero. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, when working with different situations, it is nice to keep in mind that in a conductor, the electric field is zero. Therefore, the potential difference is zero as well. In an insulator, the electric field is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{E_{applied}}{K}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the dielectric constant. Furthermore, the potential difference over a round trip is equal to zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
Click on the link to see Electric Potential through VPython!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Make sure to press &amp;quot;Run&amp;quot; to see the principle in action!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://trinket.io/embed/glowscript/0a7e486c94 Teach hand-on with GlowScript]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Watch this video for a more visual approach! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Rb9guSEeVE Electric Potential: Visualizing Voltage with 3D animations]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--== Models ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric potential of a particle at a point is equal to the potential difference of that particle with respect to infinity. Since we know how to calculate the potential difference using the formula, we can see that this implies that the electric potential at infinity is equal to zero. What does this mean? This means that a particle that is extremely far away has no potential energy. This makes sense, because a proton will not be affected by the electric field of another proton at a distance of infinity apart. This subtle detail aids in solving a case of problems types later on.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although electric potential is an important topic to learn, most problems encountered will not ask to find just the &amp;quot;electric potential,&amp;quot; instead, questions will most likely ask for the &amp;quot;electric potential difference.&amp;quot; This is because electric potential is measured using different locations, or more specifically pathways between the different locations, so instead of determining the electric potential of location A and the electric potential of final location B, it would make more sense to determine the &amp;quot;difference in electric potential between locations A and B.&amp;quot; The following mathematical model will further explain this. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like mentioned before, instead of electric potential, in most cases, electric potential difference is needed to be found. The general equation for the potential difference is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{{U}_{electric}} = {q} * ∆{V} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{{U}_{electric}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric potential energy, which is measured in Joules (J). &#039;&#039;&#039;q&#039;&#039;&#039; is the charge of the particle moving through the path of the electric potential difference, which is measured in coulombs (C). &#039;&#039;&#039;∆V&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric potential difference, which is measured in Joules per Coulomb (J/C), or just Volts (V).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Aside from the general equation, the electric potential difference can also be found in other ways. The potential difference in an &#039;&#039;&#039;uniform field&#039;&#039;&#039; is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{V} = -({E}_{x}∆{x} + {E}_{y}∆{y} + {E}_{z}∆{z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;, which can also be written as &#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{V} = -\vec{E}·∆\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the electric potential difference, which is measured in Joules per Coulomb (J/C), or just Volts (V). &#039;&#039;&#039;E&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric field, which is measured in Newtons per Coulomb (N/C), and it is important to note that the different direction components of the electric field are used in the equation. &#039;&#039;&#039;l&#039;&#039;&#039; (or the &#039;&#039;&#039;x&#039;&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;&#039;y&#039;&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;&#039;z&#039;&#039;&#039;) is the distance between the two described locations, which is measured in meters, and x, y, and z, are the different components of the difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, when working with different situations, it is nice to keep in mind that in a conductor, the electric field is zero. Therefore, the potential difference is zero as well. In an insulator, the electric field is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;{E}_{applied} / K&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; where &#039;&#039;&#039;K&#039;&#039;&#039; is the dielectric constant. Also, the round trip potential difference is always zero, or in other words, if you start from a certain point and end at the same point, then, the potential difference will be zero. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
In a capacitor, the negative charges are located on the left plate, and the positive charges are located on the right plate. Location A is at the left end of the capacitor, and Location B is at the right end of the capacitor, or in other words, Location A and B are only different in terms of their x component location. The path moves from A to B. What is the direction of the electric field? Is the potential difference positive or negative? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ep125.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer: The electric field is to the left. The potential difference is increasing, or is positive.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
The electric field always moves away from the positive charge and towards the negative charge, which means the electric field in this example is to the left. Because the direction and the electric field and the direction of the path are opposite, the potential difference is increasing, or is positive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Calculate the change in electric potential between point A, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(-4, 3,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and B, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(2,-2,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; . The electric field in the location is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; (50,0,0) \; N/C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:EP mid fig.png ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer: -300V&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta\vec{l}= (2,-2,0)\;m - (-4,3,0)\;m = (6,-5,0)\;m &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -({E}_{x}∆{x} + {E}_{y}∆{y} + {E}_{z}∆{z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -(50\; N/C \cdot 6 \;m + 0 \; N/c \cdot -5 \; m + 0\cdot 0)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -300 V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Bohr Model]] of the hydrogen atom treats it as a nucleus of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; +e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; electrons of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; orbiting in circular orbits of specific radii. Calculate the potential difference between two points, one infinitely far away from the nucleus, and the other one Bohr radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; away from the nucleus (don&#039;t worry about substituting in the values). Compute the electric potential energy associated with the electron one Bohr radius away from the nucleus, setting the potential energy at infinity as zero (remember the sign of the charge). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We may compute the electric potential by taking integrating the electric field of a point charge as the radius goes from infinity to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. This integral may be set up as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\int_\infty^{a_0} \vec{E}\cdot\text{d}\vec{l} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \int_\infty^{a_0} \frac{\text{d} r}{r^2} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This may then be solved:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\biggr{(}\frac{1}{r}\biggr{|}_\infty^{a_0} = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
to compute the potential energy, we now multiply by the charge of the electron: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, giving &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -\frac{e^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Depending on what physics or chemistry courses you may have taken before, this may be recognizable as twice the ionization energy of the n=1 orbital. The factor of two is due to the fact that in the Bohr model, the kinetic energy will be exactly half of this potential energy, and will be positive so that the net result is still negative, but with half the magnitude. This understanding of the hydrogen atom gets certain values right, but the reality of the situation is far more complicated. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is this topic connected to something that you are interested in?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am interested in robotic systems and building circuit boards and electrical systems for manufacturing robots. While studying this section in the book, I was able to connect back many of the concepts and calculations back to robotics and the electrical component of automated systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Since high school, I never really understood how to work with the voltmeter and what it measured, and I have always wanted to know, but although this particular wiki page did not go into the details and other branches of electric potential, it led me to find the answers to something I was interested in since high school, the concept of electric potential.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I think electively is really interesting. When I was younger, I participated in this demo where a group of people hold hands and someone touches this special ball full of charge. We all could feel the tingling sensation of the current passing through us. It’s cool to learn the theory behind the supposed magic that occurs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I think it&#039;s very interesting that electric potential can be seen as a property of a space and that we can have further applications using this property.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is it connected to your major?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am a Mechanical Engineering major, so I will be dealing with the electrical components of machines when I work. Therefore, I have to know these certain concepts such as electric potential in order to fully understand how they work and interact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revistionist] As a biochemistry major, electric potential and electric potential difference is not particularly related to my major, but in chemistry classes, we use electrostatic potential maps (electrostatic potential energy maps) that shows the charge distributions throughout a molecule. Although the main use in electric potential is different in physics and biochemistry (where physicists use it identify the effect of the electric field at a location), I still found it interesting as the concept of electric potential (buildup) was being used in quite a different way. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I am a computer science major. Although I deal mostly with software, the hardware aspect is still important. The algorithms that I design run differently on different machines. The time complexity of an algorithm is sometimes useless when worrying about constant factors that are determined by a system’s hardware. Quicksort, for instance, is usually faster than many other sorts that have lower time complexities. The hardware of computers heavily relies on electricity and current (which is induced by a potential difference) to switch transistors on and off and thereby process information. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I am an aerospace engineering major, and I think understanding such concepts will help me have a better holistic understanding towards fields and systems. In addition, the thinking behind solving related problems will help me better prepared for future classes that involve with solving dynamics problems. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Is there an interesting industrial application?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] Electrical potential is used to find the voltage across a path. This is useful when working with circuit components and attempting to manipulate the power output or current throughout a component.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Electric potential sensors are being used to detect a variety of electrical signals made by the human body, thus contributing to the field of electrophysiology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] The study of electric potential has lead scientists to generate very safe wires that will not overheat and cause fires. Connecting circuits to ground is important and the third prong in an electrical outlet is this ground connection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The idea of electric potential, in a way, started with Ben Franklin and his experiments in the 1740s. He began to understand the flow of electricity, which eventually paved the path towards explaining electric potential and potential difference. Scientists finally began to understand how electric fields were actually affecting the charges and the surrounding environment. Benjamin Franklin first shocked himself in 1746, while conducting experiments on electricity with found objects from around his house. Six years later, or 261 years ago for us, the founding father flew a kite attached to a key and a silk ribbon in a thunderstorm and effectively trapped lightning in a jar. The experiment is now seen as a watershed moment in mankind&#039;s venture to channel a force of nature that was viewed quite abstractly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the time Franklin started experimenting with electricity, he&#039;d already found fame and fortune as the author of Poor Richard&#039;s Almanack. Electricity wasn&#039;t a very well understood phenomenon at that point, so Franklin&#039;s research proved to be fairly foundational. The early experiments, experts believe, were inspired by other scientists&#039; work and the shortcomings therein.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ep135.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
source: http://www.benjamin-franklin-history.org/kite-experiment/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That early brush with the dangers of electricity left an impression on Franklin. He described the sensation as &amp;quot;a universal blow throughout my whole body from head to foot, which seemed within as well as without; after which the first thing I took notice of was a violent quick shaking of my body.&amp;quot; However, it didn&#039;t scare him away. In the handful of years before his famous kite experiment, Franklin contributed everything from designing the first battery designs to establishing some common nomenclature in the study of electricity. Although Franklin is often coined the father of electricity, after he set the foundations of electricity, many other scientists contributed his or her research in the advancement of electricity and eventually led to the discovery of electric potential and potential difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like mentioned multiple times throughout the page, although electric potential is a huge and important topic, it has many branches, which makes the concept of electric potential difficult to stand alone. Even with this page, to support the concept of electric potential, many crucial branches of the topic appeared, like potential difference (which also branched into [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_Path_Independence,_claimed_by_Aditya_Mohile Potential Difference Path Independence]], [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_in_a_Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Uniform Field]], and [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_of_Point_Charge_in_a_Non-Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Nonuniform Field]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External Links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] https://www.khanacademy.org/test-prep/mcat/physical-processes/electrostatics-1/v/electric-potential-at-a-point-in-space&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pcWz4tP_zUw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vpa_uApmNoo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] https://www.khanacademy.org/science/electrical-engineering/ee-electrostatics/ee-fields-potential-voltage/a/ee-electric-potential-voltage&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] &amp;quot;Benjamin Franklin and Electricity.&amp;quot; Benjamin Franklin and Electricity. N.p., n.d. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.americaslibrary.gov/aa/franklinb/aa_franklinb_electric_1.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Bottyan, Thomas. &amp;quot;Electrostatic Potential Maps.&amp;quot; Chemwiki. N.p., 02 Oct. 2013. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://chemwiki.ucdavis.edu/Core/Theoretical_Chemistry/Chemical_Bonding/General_Principles_of_Chemical_Bonding/Electrostatic_Potential_maps&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] &amp;quot;Electric Potential Difference.&amp;quot; Electric Potential Difference. The Physics Classroom, n.d. Web. 14 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/circuits/Lesson-1/Electric-Potential-Difference&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] Harland, C. J., T. D. Clark, and R. J. Prance. &amp;quot;Applications of Electric Potential (Displacement Current) Sensors in Human Body Electrophysiology.&amp;quot; International Society for Industrial Process Tomography, n.d. Web. 16 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.isipt.org/world-congress/3/269.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] Sherwood, Bruce A. &amp;quot;2.1 The Momentum Principle.&amp;quot; Matter &amp;amp; Interactions. By Ruth W. Chabay. 4th ed. Vol. 1. N.p.: John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons, 2015. 45-50. Print. Modern Mechanics.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurence12799</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=38636</id>
		<title>Electric Potential</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=38636"/>
		<updated>2020-03-24T21:57:04Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurence12799: /* A Mathematical Model */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039;, like all forms of potential energy, is the potential for work to be done, in this case by the electric force. The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; (frequently referred to as voltage, from its SI unit, the Volt) is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; associated with the test charge (1 Coulomb), such that it depends only on the source, just as the electric field is related to the electric force, but depends only on the source. One may similarly remember the parallel concept of the gravitational potential, which was gravitational potential energy divided by mass.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined with respect to the [[Electric Force]] &amp;amp; [[Electric Field]]:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} = - q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; from point b to point a&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the charge in the electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the source charge&#039;s electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a differential length along the path from point b to point a&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1150px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Derivation of Electric Potential Energy&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The differential work &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(dW)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; associated with an external force &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{F}_{ext})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moving a charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; from point b to point a &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(d\mathbf{L})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; through an electric field &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{E})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;dW = \mathbf{F}_{ext} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is the vector multiplication of the force moving the charge and the distance the object has moved.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The external force must be equal and opposite to the force associated with the source charge&#039;s electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{F}_{ext} &amp;amp;= - \mathbf{F}_{E} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= - q \mathbf{E}&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;dW = - q \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Integrating from point b to point a along the path gives:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W = -q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, since the work was defined externally, the calculated work is equal to the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} =  -q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricPotentialPaths.png|400px|right|thumb|Some sets of electrically equivalent paths for a charge.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From this, the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; per test charge in the source charge&#039;s electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{U_{ab}}{q} = - \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The electric field is a &#039;&#039;conservative vector field&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:::This means that any path used in the above line integral will give the same value for the same beginning and end points (b and a). Looking at the figure to the right, many paths for a charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; subject to the electric field of source charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are shown. In each set of four paths (Green, Blue, Yellow, and Pink), the same amount of &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is gained or lost. &lt;br /&gt;
*A special case shown in dark green near the bottom right of the figure also exists:&lt;br /&gt;
:::If a charge is moving along a path that is always perpendicular to the electric field, the line integral will evaluate to zero, and therefore the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; will also evaluate to zero.&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is easily shown with the dot product; if two variable vectors are always perpendicular, then their dot product is always zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricPotentialRadial.png|400px|right|thumb|Illustration of radial potential.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; from a source charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(Q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be written in a simpler expression:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr ( \frac{1}{r_{a}} - \frac{1}{r_{b}} \biggr )&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the source charge&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{a}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the final position &lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{b}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the initial position&lt;br /&gt;
:*The initial position is often taken to be infinity (the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined to be zero at infinity) creating a simpler and more familiar looking equation:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} r}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
:::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the distance between the source charge and the charge in the electric field&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is used to described the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; gained or lost when moving a charge radially closer to a source charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:740px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Derivation of Radial Potential&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If a charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is being moved in a source charge&#039;s &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(Q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; electric field &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{E})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; is:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} = - q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric field is known to be described radially as: ([[Electric Field]])&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{Q}{r^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Allow the path be along the radial direction:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d\mathbf{L} = dr \hat{\mathbf{r}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging these in gives:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
U_{ab} &amp;amp;= -q \int_{b}^{a} \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{Q}{r^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}} \cdot \hat{\mathbf{r}} dr \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= -q \int_{b}^{a} \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{Q}{r^2} dr \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= - \frac{qQ}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \int_{b}^{a} \frac{dr}{r^2} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= \frac{qQ}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr [ \frac{1}{r} \biggr ]_{b}^{a} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;=  \frac{qQ}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr ( \frac{1}{r_{a}} - \frac{1}{r_{b}} \biggr ) \\&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore, the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr ( \frac{1}{r_{a}} - \frac{1}{r_{b}} \biggr )&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Critical Formulas&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} = - q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{U_{ab}}{q}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::V_{ab} = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} r}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
===Externals links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Main Idea ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electric potential energy, like all forms of potential energy, is the potential for work to be done, in this case by the electric force. The electric potential (frequently referred to as voltage, from its SI unit the Volt) is the electric potential energy associated with the test charge, such that it depends only on the source, just as the electric field is related to the electric force, but depends only on the source. One may similarly remember the parallel concept of the gravitational potential, which was gravitational potential energy divided by mass.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
====Electric Potential Energy====&lt;br /&gt;
Electric potential energy may be calculated in a variety of manners, depending upon the situation. The electric potential energy between two point charges may be written in a form which follows directly from the definition of the Coulomb force:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = \frac{qQ}{4\pi\epsilon_0 r_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is the amount of energy which would be required to bring one of the charged objects (by convention the small &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; q &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; charge) from an infinite distance to its current position, where, by convention, the potential energy at infinity is equal to zero. This may, therefore, be derived from the equation for work:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Derivation with Calculus=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -W = -\int_\infty^{r_0} \vec{F}_E(r) \cdot \text{d} \vec{r} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -\int_\infty^{r_0} \frac{qQ \hat{r}}{4\pi\epsilon_0 r^2} \cdot \text{d} \vec{r} = -\frac{qQ}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\int_\infty^{r_0} \frac{\hat{r} \cdot \hat{r}}{r^2} \text{d} r &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = \frac{qQ}{4\pi \epsilon_0} \biggr{(} \frac{1}{r} \biggr{|}_{\infty}^{r_0} = \frac{qQ}{4\pi \epsilon_0 r_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Given our definition of the [[Electric Field]], we have that &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vec{F}_E(r) = q\vec{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
so the electric potential energy may be generally written as &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -q\int_a^b \vec{E} \cdot \text{d} \vec{r} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Linear assumption=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the above equation, one can see that if the electric field is constant over the length of the path, then electric potential energy may be written in a simplified manner as&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = q\vec{E}\cdot\Delta \vec{s} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Electric Potential====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just as we divided by charge to go from electric force to electric field, dividing by charge takes us from the electric potential energy to the electric potential. For a test particle of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; q &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we define &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; V = \frac{U}{q} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Derivation with Calculus=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is not especially meaningful without choosing a reference point, just as for potential energy. Thus, one may speak of the potential difference between two points, which is independent of the reference value. From the above definition of electric potential energy, it is possible to derive an expression for the potential difference between two points from the electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\int_a^b \vec{E} \cdot \text{d} \vec{s} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The vectors are used to express the path associated with this integral. The difference in electric potential will be the same no matter what path one takes, as explored in [[Path Independence of Electric Potential]]. This also allows one to write the inverse relationship, determining the electric field at a given point from the electric potential in one and three dimensions respectively:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; E = -\frac{\text{d}V}{\text{d}x}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vec{E} = -\nabla V &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \nabla &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the gradient operator.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Linear Assumption=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The above equations allow us to write the equivalent expressions under an assumption of constant values for the electric field, such that the integral reduces to &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\vec{E} \cdot \Delta \vec{l} = -(E_x \Delta x + E_y \Delta y + E_z \Delta z)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This also leads directly to the inverse expression:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vec{E} = -(\frac{\Delta V_x}{\Delta x} + \frac{\Delta V_y}{\Delta y} + \frac{\Delta V_z}{\Delta z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric potential difference in a field which is nonuniform, but whose variations are discrete, is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\sum \vec{E}\cdot \Delta\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The different parts in this particular equation resembles the equation for the potential difference in an uniform field, except that with the nonuniform field, the potential difference in the different fields are summed up. This situation can be quite easy, but when the system gets difficult, first, choose a path and divide it into smaller pieces of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;; second, write an expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -\vec{E}\cdot\Delta\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of one piece; third, add up the contributions of all the pieces; last, check the result to make sure the magnitude, direction, and units make sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is important to keep track of the sign differences. If the path follows the direction of the electric field, the sign of the potential difference will be negative. This may be imagined as dropping a positive test charge in an electric field: a positive charge will be accelerated in the direction of the field, meaning that it is gaining energy, and so its potential must be decreasing. By contrast, if the path is opposite the direction of the field, potential will be increasing, much like rolling a boulder up a hill. If the path is perpendicular to the direction of the electric field, the dot product will be equal to zero. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, when working with different situations, it is nice to keep in mind that in a conductor, the electric field is zero. Therefore, the potential difference is zero as well. In an insulator, the electric field is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{E_{applied}}{K}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the dielectric constant. Furthermore, the potential difference over a round trip is equal to zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
Click on the link to see Electric Potential through VPython!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Make sure to press &amp;quot;Run&amp;quot; to see the principle in action!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://trinket.io/embed/glowscript/0a7e486c94 Teach hand-on with GlowScript]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Watch this video for a more visual approach! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Rb9guSEeVE Electric Potential: Visualizing Voltage with 3D animations]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--== Models ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric potential of a particle at a point is equal to the potential difference of that particle with respect to infinity. Since we know how to calculate the potential difference using the formula, we can see that this implies that the electric potential at infinity is equal to zero. What does this mean? This means that a particle that is extremely far away has no potential energy. This makes sense, because a proton will not be affected by the electric field of another proton at a distance of infinity apart. This subtle detail aids in solving a case of problems types later on.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although electric potential is an important topic to learn, most problems encountered will not ask to find just the &amp;quot;electric potential,&amp;quot; instead, questions will most likely ask for the &amp;quot;electric potential difference.&amp;quot; This is because electric potential is measured using different locations, or more specifically pathways between the different locations, so instead of determining the electric potential of location A and the electric potential of final location B, it would make more sense to determine the &amp;quot;difference in electric potential between locations A and B.&amp;quot; The following mathematical model will further explain this. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like mentioned before, instead of electric potential, in most cases, electric potential difference is needed to be found. The general equation for the potential difference is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{{U}_{electric}} = {q} * ∆{V} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{{U}_{electric}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric potential energy, which is measured in Joules (J). &#039;&#039;&#039;q&#039;&#039;&#039; is the charge of the particle moving through the path of the electric potential difference, which is measured in coulombs (C). &#039;&#039;&#039;∆V&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric potential difference, which is measured in Joules per Coulomb (J/C), or just Volts (V).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Aside from the general equation, the electric potential difference can also be found in other ways. The potential difference in an &#039;&#039;&#039;uniform field&#039;&#039;&#039; is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{V} = -({E}_{x}∆{x} + {E}_{y}∆{y} + {E}_{z}∆{z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;, which can also be written as &#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{V} = -\vec{E}·∆\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the electric potential difference, which is measured in Joules per Coulomb (J/C), or just Volts (V). &#039;&#039;&#039;E&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric field, which is measured in Newtons per Coulomb (N/C), and it is important to note that the different direction components of the electric field are used in the equation. &#039;&#039;&#039;l&#039;&#039;&#039; (or the &#039;&#039;&#039;x&#039;&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;&#039;y&#039;&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;&#039;z&#039;&#039;&#039;) is the distance between the two described locations, which is measured in meters, and x, y, and z, are the different components of the difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, when working with different situations, it is nice to keep in mind that in a conductor, the electric field is zero. Therefore, the potential difference is zero as well. In an insulator, the electric field is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;{E}_{applied} / K&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; where &#039;&#039;&#039;K&#039;&#039;&#039; is the dielectric constant. Also, the round trip potential difference is always zero, or in other words, if you start from a certain point and end at the same point, then, the potential difference will be zero. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
In a capacitor, the negative charges are located on the left plate, and the positive charges are located on the right plate. Location A is at the left end of the capacitor, and Location B is at the right end of the capacitor, or in other words, Location A and B are only different in terms of their x component location. The path moves from A to B. What is the direction of the electric field? Is the potential difference positive or negative? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ep125.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer: The electric field is to the left. The potential difference is increasing, or is positive.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
The electric field always moves away from the positive charge and towards the negative charge, which means the electric field in this example is to the left. Because the direction and the electric field and the direction of the path are opposite, the potential difference is increasing, or is positive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Calculate the change in electric potential between point A, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(-4, 3,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and B, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(2,-2,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; . The electric field in the location is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; (50,0,0) \; N/C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:EP mid fig.png ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer: -300V&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta\vec{l}= (2,-2,0)\;m - (-4,3,0)\;m = (6,-5,0)\;m &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -({E}_{x}∆{x} + {E}_{y}∆{y} + {E}_{z}∆{z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -(50\; N/C \cdot 6 \;m + 0 \; N/c \cdot -5 \; m + 0\cdot 0)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -300 V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Bohr Model]] of the hydrogen atom treats it as a nucleus of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; +e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; electrons of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; orbiting in circular orbits of specific radii. Calculate the potential difference between two points, one infinitely far away from the nucleus, and the other one Bohr radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; away from the nucleus (don&#039;t worry about substituting in the values). Compute the electric potential energy associated with the electron one Bohr radius away from the nucleus, setting the potential energy at infinity as zero (remember the sign of the charge). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We may compute the electric potential by taking integrating the electric field of a point charge as the radius goes from infinity to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. This integral may be set up as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\int_\infty^{a_0} \vec{E}\cdot\text{d}\vec{l} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \int_\infty^{a_0} \frac{\text{d} r}{r^2} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This may then be solved:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\biggr{(}\frac{1}{r}\biggr{|}_\infty^{a_0} = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
to compute the potential energy, we now multiply by the charge of the electron: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, giving &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -\frac{e^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Depending on what physics or chemistry courses you may have taken before, this may be recognizable as twice the ionization energy of the n=1 orbital. The factor of two is due to the fact that in the Bohr model, the kinetic energy will be exactly half of this potential energy, and will be positive so that the net result is still negative, but with half the magnitude. This understanding of the hydrogen atom gets certain values right, but the reality of the situation is far more complicated. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is this topic connected to something that you are interested in?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am interested in robotic systems and building circuit boards and electrical systems for manufacturing robots. While studying this section in the book, I was able to connect back many of the concepts and calculations back to robotics and the electrical component of automated systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Since high school, I never really understood how to work with the voltmeter and what it measured, and I have always wanted to know, but although this particular wiki page did not go into the details and other branches of electric potential, it led me to find the answers to something I was interested in since high school, the concept of electric potential.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I think electively is really interesting. When I was younger, I participated in this demo where a group of people hold hands and someone touches this special ball full of charge. We all could feel the tingling sensation of the current passing through us. It’s cool to learn the theory behind the supposed magic that occurs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I think it&#039;s very interesting that electric potential can be seen as a property of a space and that we can have further applications using this property.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is it connected to your major?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am a Mechanical Engineering major, so I will be dealing with the electrical components of machines when I work. Therefore, I have to know these certain concepts such as electric potential in order to fully understand how they work and interact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revistionist] As a biochemistry major, electric potential and electric potential difference is not particularly related to my major, but in chemistry classes, we use electrostatic potential maps (electrostatic potential energy maps) that shows the charge distributions throughout a molecule. Although the main use in electric potential is different in physics and biochemistry (where physicists use it identify the effect of the electric field at a location), I still found it interesting as the concept of electric potential (buildup) was being used in quite a different way. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I am a computer science major. Although I deal mostly with software, the hardware aspect is still important. The algorithms that I design run differently on different machines. The time complexity of an algorithm is sometimes useless when worrying about constant factors that are determined by a system’s hardware. Quicksort, for instance, is usually faster than many other sorts that have lower time complexities. The hardware of computers heavily relies on electricity and current (which is induced by a potential difference) to switch transistors on and off and thereby process information. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I am an aerospace engineering major, and I think understanding such concepts will help me have a better holistic understanding towards fields and systems. In addition, the thinking behind solving related problems will help me better prepared for future classes that involve with solving dynamics problems. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Is there an interesting industrial application?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] Electrical potential is used to find the voltage across a path. This is useful when working with circuit components and attempting to manipulate the power output or current throughout a component.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Electric potential sensors are being used to detect a variety of electrical signals made by the human body, thus contributing to the field of electrophysiology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] The study of electric potential has lead scientists to generate very safe wires that will not overheat and cause fires. Connecting circuits to ground is important and the third prong in an electrical outlet is this ground connection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The idea of electric potential, in a way, started with Ben Franklin and his experiments in the 1740s. He began to understand the flow of electricity, which eventually paved the path towards explaining electric potential and potential difference. Scientists finally began to understand how electric fields were actually affecting the charges and the surrounding environment. Benjamin Franklin first shocked himself in 1746, while conducting experiments on electricity with found objects from around his house. Six years later, or 261 years ago for us, the founding father flew a kite attached to a key and a silk ribbon in a thunderstorm and effectively trapped lightning in a jar. The experiment is now seen as a watershed moment in mankind&#039;s venture to channel a force of nature that was viewed quite abstractly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the time Franklin started experimenting with electricity, he&#039;d already found fame and fortune as the author of Poor Richard&#039;s Almanack. Electricity wasn&#039;t a very well understood phenomenon at that point, so Franklin&#039;s research proved to be fairly foundational. The early experiments, experts believe, were inspired by other scientists&#039; work and the shortcomings therein.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ep135.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
source: http://www.benjamin-franklin-history.org/kite-experiment/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That early brush with the dangers of electricity left an impression on Franklin. He described the sensation as &amp;quot;a universal blow throughout my whole body from head to foot, which seemed within as well as without; after which the first thing I took notice of was a violent quick shaking of my body.&amp;quot; However, it didn&#039;t scare him away. In the handful of years before his famous kite experiment, Franklin contributed everything from designing the first battery designs to establishing some common nomenclature in the study of electricity. Although Franklin is often coined the father of electricity, after he set the foundations of electricity, many other scientists contributed his or her research in the advancement of electricity and eventually led to the discovery of electric potential and potential difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like mentioned multiple times throughout the page, although electric potential is a huge and important topic, it has many branches, which makes the concept of electric potential difficult to stand alone. Even with this page, to support the concept of electric potential, many crucial branches of the topic appeared, like potential difference (which also branched into [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_Path_Independence,_claimed_by_Aditya_Mohile Potential Difference Path Independence]], [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_in_a_Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Uniform Field]], and [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_of_Point_Charge_in_a_Non-Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Nonuniform Field]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External Links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] https://www.khanacademy.org/test-prep/mcat/physical-processes/electrostatics-1/v/electric-potential-at-a-point-in-space&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pcWz4tP_zUw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vpa_uApmNoo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] https://www.khanacademy.org/science/electrical-engineering/ee-electrostatics/ee-fields-potential-voltage/a/ee-electric-potential-voltage&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] &amp;quot;Benjamin Franklin and Electricity.&amp;quot; Benjamin Franklin and Electricity. N.p., n.d. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.americaslibrary.gov/aa/franklinb/aa_franklinb_electric_1.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Bottyan, Thomas. &amp;quot;Electrostatic Potential Maps.&amp;quot; Chemwiki. N.p., 02 Oct. 2013. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://chemwiki.ucdavis.edu/Core/Theoretical_Chemistry/Chemical_Bonding/General_Principles_of_Chemical_Bonding/Electrostatic_Potential_maps&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] &amp;quot;Electric Potential Difference.&amp;quot; Electric Potential Difference. The Physics Classroom, n.d. Web. 14 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/circuits/Lesson-1/Electric-Potential-Difference&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] Harland, C. J., T. D. Clark, and R. J. Prance. &amp;quot;Applications of Electric Potential (Displacement Current) Sensors in Human Body Electrophysiology.&amp;quot; International Society for Industrial Process Tomography, n.d. Web. 16 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.isipt.org/world-congress/3/269.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] Sherwood, Bruce A. &amp;quot;2.1 The Momentum Principle.&amp;quot; Matter &amp;amp; Interactions. By Ruth W. Chabay. 4th ed. Vol. 1. N.p.: John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons, 2015. 45-50. Print. Modern Mechanics.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurence12799</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=38635</id>
		<title>Electric Potential</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=38635"/>
		<updated>2020-03-24T21:50:25Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurence12799: /* A Mathematical Model */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039;, like all forms of potential energy, is the potential for work to be done, in this case by the electric force. The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; (frequently referred to as voltage, from its SI unit, the Volt) is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; associated with the test charge (1 Coulomb), such that it depends only on the source, just as the electric field is related to the electric force, but depends only on the source. One may similarly remember the parallel concept of the gravitational potential, which was gravitational potential energy divided by mass.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined with respect to the [[Electric Force]] &amp;amp; [[Electric Field]]:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} = - q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; from point b to point a&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the charge in the electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the source charge&#039;s electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a differential length along the path from point b to point a&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1150px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Derivation of Electric Potential Energy&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The differential work &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(dW)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; associated with an external force &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{F}_{ext})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moving a charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; from point b to point a &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(d\mathbf{L})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; through an electric field &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{E})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;dW = \mathbf{F}_{ext} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is the vector multiplication of the force moving the charge and the distance the object has moved.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The external force must be equal and opposite to the force associated with the source charge&#039;s electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{F}_{ext} &amp;amp;= - \mathbf{F}_{E} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= - q \mathbf{E}&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;dW = - q \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Integrating from point b to point a along the path gives:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W = -q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, since the work was defined externally, the calculated work is equal to the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} =  -q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricPotentialPaths.png|400px|right|thumb|Some sets of electrically equivalent paths for a charge.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From this, the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; per test charge in the source charge&#039;s electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{U_{ab}}{q} = - \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The electric field is a &#039;&#039;conservative vector field&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:::This means that any path used in the above line integral will give the same value for the same beginning and end points (b and a). Looking at the figure to the right, many paths for a charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; subject to the electric field of source charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are shown. In each set of four paths (Green, Blue, Yellow, and Pink), the same amount of &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is gained or lost. &lt;br /&gt;
*A special case shown in dark green near the bottom right of the figure also exists:&lt;br /&gt;
:::If a charge is moving along a path that is always perpendicular to the electric field, the line integral will evaluate to zero, and therefore the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; will also evaluate to zero.&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is easily shown with the dot product; if two variable vectors are always perpendicular, then their dot product is always zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricPotentialRadial.png|400px|right|thumb|Illustration of radial potential.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; from a source charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(Q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be written in a simpler expression:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr ( \frac{1}{r_{a}} - \frac{1}{r_{b}} \biggr )&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the source charge&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{a}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the final position &lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{b}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the initial position&lt;br /&gt;
:*The initial position is often taken to be infinity (the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined to be zero at infinity) creating a simpler and more familiar looking equation:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} r}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
:::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the distance between the source charge and the charge in the electric field&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is used to described the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; gained or lost when moving a charge radially closer to a source charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:740px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Derivation of Radial Potential&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If a charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is being moved in a source charge&#039;s &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(Q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; electric field &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{E})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; is:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} = - q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric field is known to be described radially as: ([[Electric Field]])&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{Q}{r^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Allow the path be along the radial direction:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d\mathbf{L} = dr \hat{\mathbf{r}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging these in gives:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
U_{ab} &amp;amp;= -q \int_{b}^{a} \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{Q}{r^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}} \cdot \hat{\mathbf{r}} dr \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= -q \int_{b}^{a} \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{Q}{r^2} dr \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= - \frac{qQ}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \int_{b}^{a} \frac{dr}{r^2} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= \frac{qQ}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr [ \frac{1}{r} \biggr ]_{b}^{a} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;=  \frac{qQ}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr ( \frac{1}{r_{a}} - \frac{1}{r_{b}} \biggr ) \\&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore, the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr ( \frac{1}{r_{a}} - \frac{1}{r_{b}} \biggr )&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
===Externals links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Main Idea ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electric potential energy, like all forms of potential energy, is the potential for work to be done, in this case by the electric force. The electric potential (frequently referred to as voltage, from its SI unit the Volt) is the electric potential energy associated with the test charge, such that it depends only on the source, just as the electric field is related to the electric force, but depends only on the source. One may similarly remember the parallel concept of the gravitational potential, which was gravitational potential energy divided by mass.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
====Electric Potential Energy====&lt;br /&gt;
Electric potential energy may be calculated in a variety of manners, depending upon the situation. The electric potential energy between two point charges may be written in a form which follows directly from the definition of the Coulomb force:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = \frac{qQ}{4\pi\epsilon_0 r_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is the amount of energy which would be required to bring one of the charged objects (by convention the small &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; q &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; charge) from an infinite distance to its current position, where, by convention, the potential energy at infinity is equal to zero. This may, therefore, be derived from the equation for work:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Derivation with Calculus=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -W = -\int_\infty^{r_0} \vec{F}_E(r) \cdot \text{d} \vec{r} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -\int_\infty^{r_0} \frac{qQ \hat{r}}{4\pi\epsilon_0 r^2} \cdot \text{d} \vec{r} = -\frac{qQ}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\int_\infty^{r_0} \frac{\hat{r} \cdot \hat{r}}{r^2} \text{d} r &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = \frac{qQ}{4\pi \epsilon_0} \biggr{(} \frac{1}{r} \biggr{|}_{\infty}^{r_0} = \frac{qQ}{4\pi \epsilon_0 r_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Given our definition of the [[Electric Field]], we have that &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vec{F}_E(r) = q\vec{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
so the electric potential energy may be generally written as &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -q\int_a^b \vec{E} \cdot \text{d} \vec{r} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Linear assumption=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the above equation, one can see that if the electric field is constant over the length of the path, then electric potential energy may be written in a simplified manner as&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = q\vec{E}\cdot\Delta \vec{s} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Electric Potential====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just as we divided by charge to go from electric force to electric field, dividing by charge takes us from the electric potential energy to the electric potential. For a test particle of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; q &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we define &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; V = \frac{U}{q} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Derivation with Calculus=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is not especially meaningful without choosing a reference point, just as for potential energy. Thus, one may speak of the potential difference between two points, which is independent of the reference value. From the above definition of electric potential energy, it is possible to derive an expression for the potential difference between two points from the electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\int_a^b \vec{E} \cdot \text{d} \vec{s} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The vectors are used to express the path associated with this integral. The difference in electric potential will be the same no matter what path one takes, as explored in [[Path Independence of Electric Potential]]. This also allows one to write the inverse relationship, determining the electric field at a given point from the electric potential in one and three dimensions respectively:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; E = -\frac{\text{d}V}{\text{d}x}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vec{E} = -\nabla V &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \nabla &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the gradient operator.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Linear Assumption=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The above equations allow us to write the equivalent expressions under an assumption of constant values for the electric field, such that the integral reduces to &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\vec{E} \cdot \Delta \vec{l} = -(E_x \Delta x + E_y \Delta y + E_z \Delta z)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This also leads directly to the inverse expression:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vec{E} = -(\frac{\Delta V_x}{\Delta x} + \frac{\Delta V_y}{\Delta y} + \frac{\Delta V_z}{\Delta z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric potential difference in a field which is nonuniform, but whose variations are discrete, is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\sum \vec{E}\cdot \Delta\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The different parts in this particular equation resembles the equation for the potential difference in an uniform field, except that with the nonuniform field, the potential difference in the different fields are summed up. This situation can be quite easy, but when the system gets difficult, first, choose a path and divide it into smaller pieces of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;; second, write an expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -\vec{E}\cdot\Delta\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of one piece; third, add up the contributions of all the pieces; last, check the result to make sure the magnitude, direction, and units make sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is important to keep track of the sign differences. If the path follows the direction of the electric field, the sign of the potential difference will be negative. This may be imagined as dropping a positive test charge in an electric field: a positive charge will be accelerated in the direction of the field, meaning that it is gaining energy, and so its potential must be decreasing. By contrast, if the path is opposite the direction of the field, potential will be increasing, much like rolling a boulder up a hill. If the path is perpendicular to the direction of the electric field, the dot product will be equal to zero. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, when working with different situations, it is nice to keep in mind that in a conductor, the electric field is zero. Therefore, the potential difference is zero as well. In an insulator, the electric field is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{E_{applied}}{K}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the dielectric constant. Furthermore, the potential difference over a round trip is equal to zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
Click on the link to see Electric Potential through VPython!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Make sure to press &amp;quot;Run&amp;quot; to see the principle in action!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://trinket.io/embed/glowscript/0a7e486c94 Teach hand-on with GlowScript]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Watch this video for a more visual approach! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Rb9guSEeVE Electric Potential: Visualizing Voltage with 3D animations]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--== Models ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric potential of a particle at a point is equal to the potential difference of that particle with respect to infinity. Since we know how to calculate the potential difference using the formula, we can see that this implies that the electric potential at infinity is equal to zero. What does this mean? This means that a particle that is extremely far away has no potential energy. This makes sense, because a proton will not be affected by the electric field of another proton at a distance of infinity apart. This subtle detail aids in solving a case of problems types later on.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although electric potential is an important topic to learn, most problems encountered will not ask to find just the &amp;quot;electric potential,&amp;quot; instead, questions will most likely ask for the &amp;quot;electric potential difference.&amp;quot; This is because electric potential is measured using different locations, or more specifically pathways between the different locations, so instead of determining the electric potential of location A and the electric potential of final location B, it would make more sense to determine the &amp;quot;difference in electric potential between locations A and B.&amp;quot; The following mathematical model will further explain this. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like mentioned before, instead of electric potential, in most cases, electric potential difference is needed to be found. The general equation for the potential difference is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{{U}_{electric}} = {q} * ∆{V} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{{U}_{electric}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric potential energy, which is measured in Joules (J). &#039;&#039;&#039;q&#039;&#039;&#039; is the charge of the particle moving through the path of the electric potential difference, which is measured in coulombs (C). &#039;&#039;&#039;∆V&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric potential difference, which is measured in Joules per Coulomb (J/C), or just Volts (V).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Aside from the general equation, the electric potential difference can also be found in other ways. The potential difference in an &#039;&#039;&#039;uniform field&#039;&#039;&#039; is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{V} = -({E}_{x}∆{x} + {E}_{y}∆{y} + {E}_{z}∆{z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;, which can also be written as &#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{V} = -\vec{E}·∆\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the electric potential difference, which is measured in Joules per Coulomb (J/C), or just Volts (V). &#039;&#039;&#039;E&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric field, which is measured in Newtons per Coulomb (N/C), and it is important to note that the different direction components of the electric field are used in the equation. &#039;&#039;&#039;l&#039;&#039;&#039; (or the &#039;&#039;&#039;x&#039;&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;&#039;y&#039;&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;&#039;z&#039;&#039;&#039;) is the distance between the two described locations, which is measured in meters, and x, y, and z, are the different components of the difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, when working with different situations, it is nice to keep in mind that in a conductor, the electric field is zero. Therefore, the potential difference is zero as well. In an insulator, the electric field is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;{E}_{applied} / K&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; where &#039;&#039;&#039;K&#039;&#039;&#039; is the dielectric constant. Also, the round trip potential difference is always zero, or in other words, if you start from a certain point and end at the same point, then, the potential difference will be zero. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
In a capacitor, the negative charges are located on the left plate, and the positive charges are located on the right plate. Location A is at the left end of the capacitor, and Location B is at the right end of the capacitor, or in other words, Location A and B are only different in terms of their x component location. The path moves from A to B. What is the direction of the electric field? Is the potential difference positive or negative? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ep125.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer: The electric field is to the left. The potential difference is increasing, or is positive.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
The electric field always moves away from the positive charge and towards the negative charge, which means the electric field in this example is to the left. Because the direction and the electric field and the direction of the path are opposite, the potential difference is increasing, or is positive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Calculate the change in electric potential between point A, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(-4, 3,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and B, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(2,-2,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; . The electric field in the location is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; (50,0,0) \; N/C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:EP mid fig.png ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer: -300V&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta\vec{l}= (2,-2,0)\;m - (-4,3,0)\;m = (6,-5,0)\;m &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -({E}_{x}∆{x} + {E}_{y}∆{y} + {E}_{z}∆{z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -(50\; N/C \cdot 6 \;m + 0 \; N/c \cdot -5 \; m + 0\cdot 0)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -300 V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Bohr Model]] of the hydrogen atom treats it as a nucleus of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; +e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; electrons of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; orbiting in circular orbits of specific radii. Calculate the potential difference between two points, one infinitely far away from the nucleus, and the other one Bohr radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; away from the nucleus (don&#039;t worry about substituting in the values). Compute the electric potential energy associated with the electron one Bohr radius away from the nucleus, setting the potential energy at infinity as zero (remember the sign of the charge). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We may compute the electric potential by taking integrating the electric field of a point charge as the radius goes from infinity to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. This integral may be set up as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\int_\infty^{a_0} \vec{E}\cdot\text{d}\vec{l} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \int_\infty^{a_0} \frac{\text{d} r}{r^2} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This may then be solved:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\biggr{(}\frac{1}{r}\biggr{|}_\infty^{a_0} = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
to compute the potential energy, we now multiply by the charge of the electron: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, giving &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -\frac{e^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Depending on what physics or chemistry courses you may have taken before, this may be recognizable as twice the ionization energy of the n=1 orbital. The factor of two is due to the fact that in the Bohr model, the kinetic energy will be exactly half of this potential energy, and will be positive so that the net result is still negative, but with half the magnitude. This understanding of the hydrogen atom gets certain values right, but the reality of the situation is far more complicated. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is this topic connected to something that you are interested in?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am interested in robotic systems and building circuit boards and electrical systems for manufacturing robots. While studying this section in the book, I was able to connect back many of the concepts and calculations back to robotics and the electrical component of automated systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Since high school, I never really understood how to work with the voltmeter and what it measured, and I have always wanted to know, but although this particular wiki page did not go into the details and other branches of electric potential, it led me to find the answers to something I was interested in since high school, the concept of electric potential.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I think electively is really interesting. When I was younger, I participated in this demo where a group of people hold hands and someone touches this special ball full of charge. We all could feel the tingling sensation of the current passing through us. It’s cool to learn the theory behind the supposed magic that occurs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I think it&#039;s very interesting that electric potential can be seen as a property of a space and that we can have further applications using this property.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is it connected to your major?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am a Mechanical Engineering major, so I will be dealing with the electrical components of machines when I work. Therefore, I have to know these certain concepts such as electric potential in order to fully understand how they work and interact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revistionist] As a biochemistry major, electric potential and electric potential difference is not particularly related to my major, but in chemistry classes, we use electrostatic potential maps (electrostatic potential energy maps) that shows the charge distributions throughout a molecule. Although the main use in electric potential is different in physics and biochemistry (where physicists use it identify the effect of the electric field at a location), I still found it interesting as the concept of electric potential (buildup) was being used in quite a different way. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I am a computer science major. Although I deal mostly with software, the hardware aspect is still important. The algorithms that I design run differently on different machines. The time complexity of an algorithm is sometimes useless when worrying about constant factors that are determined by a system’s hardware. Quicksort, for instance, is usually faster than many other sorts that have lower time complexities. The hardware of computers heavily relies on electricity and current (which is induced by a potential difference) to switch transistors on and off and thereby process information. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I am an aerospace engineering major, and I think understanding such concepts will help me have a better holistic understanding towards fields and systems. In addition, the thinking behind solving related problems will help me better prepared for future classes that involve with solving dynamics problems. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Is there an interesting industrial application?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] Electrical potential is used to find the voltage across a path. This is useful when working with circuit components and attempting to manipulate the power output or current throughout a component.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Electric potential sensors are being used to detect a variety of electrical signals made by the human body, thus contributing to the field of electrophysiology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] The study of electric potential has lead scientists to generate very safe wires that will not overheat and cause fires. Connecting circuits to ground is important and the third prong in an electrical outlet is this ground connection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The idea of electric potential, in a way, started with Ben Franklin and his experiments in the 1740s. He began to understand the flow of electricity, which eventually paved the path towards explaining electric potential and potential difference. Scientists finally began to understand how electric fields were actually affecting the charges and the surrounding environment. Benjamin Franklin first shocked himself in 1746, while conducting experiments on electricity with found objects from around his house. Six years later, or 261 years ago for us, the founding father flew a kite attached to a key and a silk ribbon in a thunderstorm and effectively trapped lightning in a jar. The experiment is now seen as a watershed moment in mankind&#039;s venture to channel a force of nature that was viewed quite abstractly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the time Franklin started experimenting with electricity, he&#039;d already found fame and fortune as the author of Poor Richard&#039;s Almanack. Electricity wasn&#039;t a very well understood phenomenon at that point, so Franklin&#039;s research proved to be fairly foundational. The early experiments, experts believe, were inspired by other scientists&#039; work and the shortcomings therein.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ep135.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
source: http://www.benjamin-franklin-history.org/kite-experiment/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That early brush with the dangers of electricity left an impression on Franklin. He described the sensation as &amp;quot;a universal blow throughout my whole body from head to foot, which seemed within as well as without; after which the first thing I took notice of was a violent quick shaking of my body.&amp;quot; However, it didn&#039;t scare him away. In the handful of years before his famous kite experiment, Franklin contributed everything from designing the first battery designs to establishing some common nomenclature in the study of electricity. Although Franklin is often coined the father of electricity, after he set the foundations of electricity, many other scientists contributed his or her research in the advancement of electricity and eventually led to the discovery of electric potential and potential difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like mentioned multiple times throughout the page, although electric potential is a huge and important topic, it has many branches, which makes the concept of electric potential difficult to stand alone. Even with this page, to support the concept of electric potential, many crucial branches of the topic appeared, like potential difference (which also branched into [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_Path_Independence,_claimed_by_Aditya_Mohile Potential Difference Path Independence]], [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_in_a_Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Uniform Field]], and [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_of_Point_Charge_in_a_Non-Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Nonuniform Field]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External Links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] https://www.khanacademy.org/test-prep/mcat/physical-processes/electrostatics-1/v/electric-potential-at-a-point-in-space&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pcWz4tP_zUw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vpa_uApmNoo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] https://www.khanacademy.org/science/electrical-engineering/ee-electrostatics/ee-fields-potential-voltage/a/ee-electric-potential-voltage&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] &amp;quot;Benjamin Franklin and Electricity.&amp;quot; Benjamin Franklin and Electricity. N.p., n.d. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.americaslibrary.gov/aa/franklinb/aa_franklinb_electric_1.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Bottyan, Thomas. &amp;quot;Electrostatic Potential Maps.&amp;quot; Chemwiki. N.p., 02 Oct. 2013. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://chemwiki.ucdavis.edu/Core/Theoretical_Chemistry/Chemical_Bonding/General_Principles_of_Chemical_Bonding/Electrostatic_Potential_maps&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] &amp;quot;Electric Potential Difference.&amp;quot; Electric Potential Difference. The Physics Classroom, n.d. Web. 14 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/circuits/Lesson-1/Electric-Potential-Difference&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] Harland, C. J., T. D. Clark, and R. J. Prance. &amp;quot;Applications of Electric Potential (Displacement Current) Sensors in Human Body Electrophysiology.&amp;quot; International Society for Industrial Process Tomography, n.d. Web. 16 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.isipt.org/world-congress/3/269.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] Sherwood, Bruce A. &amp;quot;2.1 The Momentum Principle.&amp;quot; Matter &amp;amp; Interactions. By Ruth W. Chabay. 4th ed. Vol. 1. N.p.: John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons, 2015. 45-50. Print. Modern Mechanics.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurence12799</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Field&amp;diff=38634</id>
		<title>Electric Field</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Field&amp;diff=38634"/>
		<updated>2020-03-24T21:30:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurence12799: /* The Main Idea */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
In this page, the concept of an &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; produced by an electric point charge will be described qualitatively and quantitatively through models, examples, and a simulation. An &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; is a useful concept to describe how any charged particle would affect charge around it through the Coulomb Force. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; of a point charge is spherically symmetric, meaning it is the same at all points of equal radius from the source. Hence, it is useful to speak of the electric field at a certain radius (not at a certain &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y,z)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; position), which will be done in [[electric Field#A Mathematical Model| the mathematical model]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Keep in mind, the electric field is a vector quantity, meaning it has a magnitude and direction. The SI units are N/C.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bigl( \mathbf{E}_{s} \bigl)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of a point source charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bigl( Q_{s} \bigl)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; gives the magnitude and direction of the Electrostatic Force vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bigl( \mathbf{F}_{s} \bigl)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; exerted on a unit charge (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; Coulomb) by &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q_{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as a function of position &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bigl( \mathbf{r} = (x,y,z) \bigl)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. More generally however, the Electrostatic Force vector exerted on any point charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bigl( q \bigl)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; by a point source charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bigl( Q_{s} \bigl)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is related to the source charge&#039;s &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; vector by:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{F}_{s} ( \mathbf{r} ) = q \mathbf{E}_{s} ( \mathbf{r} )&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This definition requires an understanding of the Electrostatic Force (Coulomb&#039;s Law), and its mathematical description. If you are not familiar with this yet, read over the [[Electric Force]] page and come back.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the Electric Force is defined as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{F}( \mathbf{r} ) = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_{o}}\frac{q_{1} q_{2}}{r^{2}} \hat{\mathbf{r}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\epsilon_{o}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the permittivity of free space with a value of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;8.854 \times 10^{-12} \frac{\text{C}^2}{\text{N} \cdot \text{m}^2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are point charges one and two, respectively&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the distance between the two point charges, which can also be written as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;|\mathbf{r}|&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, the magnitude of the vector connecting the two charges&#039; positions&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat{\mathbf{r}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the unit vector pointing from charge one to charge two, or from charge two to charge one, depending on whether the force on charge two or charge one is wanted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; of a source charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q_{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{E}_{s} ( \mathbf{r}) &amp;amp; = \frac{\mathbf{F}_{s} ( \mathbf{r} )}{q} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp; = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_{o}}\frac{Q_{s}}{r^{2}}\hat{\mathbf{r}}&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Radially, the magnitude of a point charge&#039;s &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; looks something like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MagnitudeofEField.jpg|center|700px|thumb|&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;2 \times 10^{-15} \ \text{C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; charge&#039;s &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; magnitude as a function of radius.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A point charge&#039;s &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; is also related to its Electric Potential. If you are unfamiliar with the idea of electric potential, then review these pages ([[Electric Field and Electric Potential]] and [[Electric Potential]]) and come back.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A charge&#039;s &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; and Electric Potential &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are related by:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = -\int_{\mathbf{b}}^{\mathbf{a}} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the potential difference between points &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{a}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{b}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is an infinitesimal length along the path between &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{a}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{b}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This relation is less useful for us unless we use a straight line approximation, such that:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
V_{ab} &amp;amp; = -\mathbf{E} \cdot \Delta \mathbf{L} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp; = - \bigl( E_{x}, E_{y}, E_{z} \bigl) \cdot \bigl( \Delta L_{x}, \Delta L_{y}, \Delta L_{z} \bigl) \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp; = - \bigl( E_{x}\Delta L_{x} + E_{y}\Delta L_{y} + E_{z}\Delta L_{z} \bigl) \\&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This leads to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} (x,y,z) = - \biggl( \frac{\Delta V_{x}}{\Delta L_{x}}, \frac{\Delta V_{y}}{\Delta L_{y}}, \frac{\Delta V_{z}}{\Delta L_{z}} \biggl)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By convention, the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; due to a positive point charge always points away from itself, and the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; of a negative point charge always points towards itself as shown below:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Posandnegefield.png|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Opposite charges will attract each other, and like charges will repel each other, as shown below:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Multiplechargeefield.png|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lastly, the Principle of Superposition is directly applicable to finding the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; due to multiple point source charges, using the a vector sum:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{E}_{sum} (\mathbf{r}) &amp;amp; = \mathbf{E}_{1} + \mathbf{E}_{2} + \mathbf{E}_{3} + \cdots + \mathbf{E}_{N} \\ &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp; = \sum_{1}^{N} \mathbf{E}_{n} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp; = \sum_{1}^{N} \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{o}} \frac{Q_{s_{n}}}{r_{n}^{2}} \hat{\mathbf{r}}_n&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::*When using this, be careful to take note that the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; of a negative charge points in the opposite direction as a positive charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Critical Formulas:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} ( \mathbf{r}) = \frac{\mathbf{F} ( \mathbf{r} )}{q}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
**&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} ( \mathbf{r}) = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_{o}}\frac{Q}{r^{2}}\hat{\mathbf{r}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
**&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} (x,y,z) = - \biggl( \frac{\Delta V_{x}}{\Delta L_{x}}, \frac{\Delta V_{y}}{\Delta L_{y}}, \frac{\Delta V_{z}}{\Delta L_{z}} \biggl)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
**&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{sum} (\mathbf{r}) = \sum_{1}^{N} \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{o}} \frac{Q_{s_{n}}}{r_{n}^{2}} \hat{\mathbf{r}}_n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:NormalEField.png|right|250px|thumb|Normal view of simulated electric field]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    ###--Create Electric Field Lines of a Positive Charge at the Origin--###&lt;br /&gt;
    #==============================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Import statements for VPython---#&lt;br /&gt;
    from __future__ import division&lt;br /&gt;
    from visual import *&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Import function used to find combinations---#&lt;br /&gt;
    from itertools import combinations&lt;br /&gt;
    #==============================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Create scene---#&lt;br /&gt;
    scene.center = vector(0,0,0)  #-Position of source charge-#&lt;br /&gt;
    scene.height = 800  #-Set height of frame of scene-#&lt;br /&gt;
    scene.width = 800  #-Set width of frame of scene-#&lt;br /&gt;
    scene.range = 4  #-Set range of scene-#&lt;br /&gt;
    scene.userzoom = 1  #-Allow user to zoom in/out: CTRL &amp;amp; move in/out on trackpad-#&lt;br /&gt;
    scene.userspin = 1  #-Allow user to rotate camera angle: SHIFT &amp;amp; OPTION &amp;amp; move around on track pad-#&lt;br /&gt;
    #==============================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Specify point charge attributes---#&lt;br /&gt;
    sourceCharge = 3*10**(-11)  #-Coulombs of charge-#&lt;br /&gt;
    sourcePos = vector(0,0,0) #-Position of source charge-#&lt;br /&gt;
    ###--Modeling source point charge as a sphere with radius 0.1 meters--###&lt;br /&gt;
    sourceObj = sphere(pos = sourcePos, radius = 0.1, color = color.cyan)&lt;br /&gt;
    #==============================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Set range (0 to 3) and possible inputs for the coordinates (0.5 step)---#&lt;br /&gt;
    ###--Many of the same number included to allow for combinations such as (1,1,1).&lt;br /&gt;
        #The itertools.combinations function will only use each element of the...&lt;br /&gt;
        #list once, starting from the beginning.&lt;br /&gt;
        #Repeating each coordinate many times with intermixing, grants...&lt;br /&gt;
    [[File:CenteredAndDistantEField.png|right|250px|thumb|Distant view of simulated electric field]]&lt;br /&gt;
        #all combinations of points, with repeats however.&lt;br /&gt;
        #Later, a for loop will be used to eliminate repeats.&lt;br /&gt;
        #This can be optimized later if need be.---------------###&lt;br /&gt;
    posXYZ = [0, -0.5, 1, -1.5, 2, -2.5, 3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, 0.5, -1, 1.5, -2, 2.5, -3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, -0.5, 1, -1.5, 2, -2.5, 3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, 0.5, -1, 1.5, -2, 2.5, -3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, -0.5, 1, -1.5, 2, -2.5, 3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, 0.5, -1, 1.5, -2, 2.5, -3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, -0.5, 1, -1.5, 2, -2.5, 3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, 0.5, -1, 1.5, -2, 2.5, -3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, -0.5, 1, -1.5, 2, -2.5, 3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, 0.5, -1, 1.5, -2, 2.5, -3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, -0.5, 1, -1.5, 2, -2.5, 3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, 0.5, -1, 1.5, -2, 2.5, -3]&lt;br /&gt;
    #==============================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:RotatedAndZoomedInEField.png|right|250px|thumb|Rotated and zoomed in view of simulated electric field]]&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Create combinations of points (x,y,z) for later use---#&lt;br /&gt;
        ###--prelimPoints will be a list of tuples of tuples--##&lt;br /&gt;
            #ie: [((,,),(,,),(,,),(,,)) , ((,,),(,,)) ,..., ((,,),(,,))]&lt;br /&gt;
    prelimPoints = [tuple(combinations(posXYZ, 3))]&lt;br /&gt;
    ###--Pull the points out of the grouping tuples and add them to a...&lt;br /&gt;
        #new list alphaPoints------------------------###&lt;br /&gt;
    alphaPoints = []&lt;br /&gt;
    for groupingTuple in prelimPoints:&lt;br /&gt;
        for XYZ in groupingTuple:&lt;br /&gt;
            if XYZ not in alphaPoints:  #-Check for repeat (x,y,z)-#&lt;br /&gt;
                alphaPoints.append(XYZ)&lt;br /&gt;
            ##--The negative of this tuple may not be in the combinations:&lt;br /&gt;
                #check to see-------------##&lt;br /&gt;
            first = -XYZ[0]&lt;br /&gt;
            second = -XYZ[1]&lt;br /&gt;
            third = -XYZ[2]&lt;br /&gt;
            negXYZ = (first, second, third)&lt;br /&gt;
            if negXYZ not in alphaPoints:&lt;br /&gt;
                alphaPoints.append(negXYZ)&lt;br /&gt;
            ##--Swap x and z coordinates for futher combination checking--##&lt;br /&gt;
            first = XYZ[2]&lt;br /&gt;
            second = XYZ[1]&lt;br /&gt;
            third = XYZ[0]&lt;br /&gt;
            reverseXYZ = (first, second, third)&lt;br /&gt;
            if reverseXYZ not in alphaPoints:&lt;br /&gt;
                alphaPoints.append(reverseXYZ)&lt;br /&gt;
            ##--The negative of the x and z coordinate swap may not be in...&lt;br /&gt;
                #the combinations: check to see---------##&lt;br /&gt;
            first = -XYZ[2]&lt;br /&gt;
            second = -XYZ[1]&lt;br /&gt;
            third = -XYZ[0]&lt;br /&gt;
            reverseXYZneg = (first, second, third)&lt;br /&gt;
            if reverseXYZneg not in alphaPoints:&lt;br /&gt;
                alphaPoints.append(reverseXYZneg)&lt;br /&gt;
            ##--Make x [3], y [0], and z [1] to check for more combinations--##&lt;br /&gt;
            first = XYZ[1]&lt;br /&gt;
            second = XYZ[2]&lt;br /&gt;
            third = XYZ[0]&lt;br /&gt;
            shiftedXYZ = (first, second, third)&lt;br /&gt;
            if shiftedXYZ not in alphaPoints:&lt;br /&gt;
                alphaPoints.append(shiftedXYZ)&lt;br /&gt;
            ##--The negative of the shifted XYZ may not be in the combinations:&lt;br /&gt;
                #check to see---------------##&lt;br /&gt;
            first = -XYZ[1]&lt;br /&gt;
            second = -XYZ[2]&lt;br /&gt;
            third = -XYZ[0]&lt;br /&gt;
            shiftedXYZneg = (first, second, third)&lt;br /&gt;
            if shiftedXYZneg not in alphaPoints:&lt;br /&gt;
                alphaPoints.append(shiftedXYZneg)&lt;br /&gt;
    ###--------This should be enough recombining---------###&lt;br /&gt;
    #================================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SideAngleAndTopViewEField.png|right|250px|thumb|Rotated top view of simulated electric field]]&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Create a new list of tuples that contain the points, magnitude,...&lt;br /&gt;
        #and direction (betaPoints)-----------#&lt;br /&gt;
            #ie: [((x,y,z), mag((x,y,z)), norm((x,y,z))),...]&lt;br /&gt;
    betaPoints = []&lt;br /&gt;
    for XYZ in alphaPoints:&lt;br /&gt;
        Mag = mag(XYZ)&lt;br /&gt;
        Dir = norm(XYZ)&lt;br /&gt;
        betaPoints.append((XYZ, Mag, Dir))&lt;br /&gt;
    #================================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Sort the tuples based on their magnitudes from least to greatest...&lt;br /&gt;
       #using sorted().&lt;br /&gt;
            #key = lamda x: x[1] tells the sorted function to sort the tuples...&lt;br /&gt;
                #based on their second component...their magnitudes--------#&lt;br /&gt;
    charliePoints = sorted(betaPoints, key = lambda x: x[1])&lt;br /&gt;
    #================================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Calculate parts of electric field equation:&lt;br /&gt;
        #E = 1/(4*pi*epsilon0) * Q/(magnitude)**2&lt;br /&gt;
    epsilonO = 8.854*(10**(-12)) #-N*(m/C)**2-#&lt;br /&gt;
    k = 1/(4*pi*(epsilonO)) #-N*(m/C)**2-#&lt;br /&gt;
    chargeContri = k*sourceCharge #-N*(m**2/C)-#&lt;br /&gt;
    #================================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Loop through points and find mag of electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
        #add it to a new list with the existing tuple info-------#&lt;br /&gt;
    deltaPoints = []&lt;br /&gt;
    for XYZ in charliePoints:&lt;br /&gt;
        try:  ###-Avoid divide by 0 error in (x,y,z) = (0,0,0)-###&lt;br /&gt;
            magEfield = chargeContri*(1/(XYZ[1])**2)&lt;br /&gt;
        except:&lt;br /&gt;
            magEfield = 0&lt;br /&gt;
        tupEfield = (XYZ[0], XYZ[1], XYZ[2], magEfield)&lt;br /&gt;
        deltaPoints.append(tupEfield)&lt;br /&gt;
    #================================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SIdeAngleAndSideViewEField.png|right|250px|thumb|Side angle of simulated electric field]]&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Loop through points and create an arrow at that point proportional in...&lt;br /&gt;
        #length to the magnitude of the electric field there.&lt;br /&gt;
        #Also, the arrow points in the direction of the electric field there.&lt;br /&gt;
        #Color coding is based on 0.25 meter increments:&lt;br /&gt;
            #stronger field = redder; weaker field = blue&lt;br /&gt;
    for XYZ in deltaPoints:&lt;br /&gt;
        if XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 0.25:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*0.5&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.000, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*0.2,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*0.25)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 0.5:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*0.7&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.200, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*0.2,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*0.25)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 1:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*0.9&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.300, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*0.2,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*0.25)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 1.25:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*1.1&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.400, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*0.2,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*0.25)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 1.5:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*1.3&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.500, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*1,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*1)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 1.75:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*1.5&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.600, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*1,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*1)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 2:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*1.7&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.700, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*1,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*1)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 2.25:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*1.9&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.800, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*1,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*1)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 2.5:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*2.1&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.900, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*1,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*1)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 2.75:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*2.3&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 1.000, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*1,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*1)&lt;br /&gt;
        else:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*2.5&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = color.blue,&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*1,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Also, at this link [https://phet.colorado.edu/en/simulation/charges-and-fields Charges and Fields] is a PhET simulation of &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Fields&#039;&#039;&#039;. Play with it if you like.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Question&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
::In the following figure, the red circles represent positive point charges, and the blue circles represent negative point charges. If the yellow arrows are meant to represent the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; due to each point charge, &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;which field(s) and charge(s) are correctly matched?&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039; (Only take into account direction)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricFieldSimpleExample.png|600px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Solution&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
::Since &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; lines always point away from a positive point charge, Option (C.) cannot be correct. Likewise, &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; lines always point towards a negative charge. Therefore, Option (A.) is also incorrect.&lt;br /&gt;
::Option (B.) shows a positive charge with an &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; pointing radially outwards. This is correct. Option (D.) shows a negative charge with an &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; pointing radially inwards. This is also correct.&lt;br /&gt;
:::&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer:&#039;&#039;&#039; Options (B.) &amp;amp; (D.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Question&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:: Four point charges &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\big(q_{1}, q_{2}, q_{3}, \text{and} \ q_{4} \big)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, are each located at a distance &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; along either the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; or &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; axes, as shown in the figure below. &lt;br /&gt;
:*&#039;&#039;&#039;A.)&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;What is the net Electric Field at the origin?&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:*&#039;&#039;&#039;B.)&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;If &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\ |q_{3}| = |q_{1}| \ \text{and} \ |q_{4}| = |q_{2}|&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; what does the Electric Field at the origin reduce to?&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricFieldMiddlingExample.png|600px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Solution&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:*&#039;&#039;&#039;A.)&#039;&#039;&#039; To find the net &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; at the origin, we must first find the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; due to each charge at the origin. &lt;br /&gt;
::*Starting with &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, its general &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; can be described as:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{1} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{1}|}{r_{1}^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}}_{1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is measured relative to the location of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
::::The origin is a distance &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; away from &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, which is along the y-axis. Since it is a positive charge, its &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; at the origin will point &amp;quot;down&amp;quot; the y-axis (away from the charge):&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{1} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{1}|}{d^2} (-\mathbf{j})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{j}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the unit vector in the y-direction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*For &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; we have:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{2} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{2}|}{r_{2}^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}}_{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is measured relative to the location of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
::::The origin is a distance &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; away from &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, which is along the x-axis. Since it is a positive charge, its &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; at the origin will point to the left (away from the charge):&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{2} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{2}|}{d^2} (-\mathbf{i})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{i}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the unit vector in the x-direction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*For &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; we have:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{3} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{3}|}{r_{3}^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}}_{3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is measured relative to the location of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
::::The origin is a distance &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; away from &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, which is along the y-axis. Since it is a negative charge, its &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; at the origin will point &amp;quot;down&amp;quot; the y-axis (towards the charge):&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{3} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{3}|}{d^2} (-\mathbf{j})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{j}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the same unit vector in the y-direction from earlier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*For &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{4}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the electric field is:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{4} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{4}|}{r_{4}^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}}_{4}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{4}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is measured relative to the location of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{4}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
::::The origin is a distance &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; away from &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{4}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, which is along the x-axis. Since it is a positive charge, its &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; at the origin will point to the right (away from the charge):&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{4} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{4}|}{d^2} (\mathbf{i})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{i}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the same unit vector in the x-direction from earlier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Now that we have the four &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Fields&#039;&#039;&#039; present at the origin, we can use the Principle of Superposition to find the &#039;&#039;&#039;net&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; at the origin:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{E}_{net} &amp;amp;= \mathbf{E}_{1} + \mathbf{E}_{2} + \mathbf{E}_{3} + \mathbf{E}_{4} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{1}|}{d^2} (-\mathbf{j}) + \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{2}|}{d^2} (-\mathbf{i}) + \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{3}|}{d^2} (-\mathbf{j}) + \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{4}|}{d^2} (\mathbf{i}) \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} \Big[ -|q_{1}| \mathbf{j} -|q_{2}| \mathbf{i} -|q_{3}| \mathbf{j} + |q_{4}| \mathbf{i} \Big] \\&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{E}_{net} &amp;amp;= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} \Big[ \big( |q_{4}| - |q_{2}| \big)\mathbf{i} - \big( |q_{1}| + |q_{3}| \big)\mathbf{j} \Big]&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricFieldMiddlingExampleAnswer.png|400px|right|thumb|Part &#039;&#039;&#039;(B)&#039;&#039;&#039; answer]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*&#039;&#039;&#039;B.)&#039;&#039;&#039; We will simply plug in the specified values into our answer from &#039;&#039;&#039;(A)&#039;&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{E}_{net} &amp;amp;= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} \Big[ \big( |q_{4}| - |q_{2}| \big)\mathbf{i} - \big( |q_{1}| + |q_{3}| \big)\mathbf{j} \Big] \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} \Big[ \big( |q_{2}| - |q_{2}| \big)\mathbf{i} - \big( |q_{1}| + |q_{1}| \big)\mathbf{j} \Big] \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} \Big[ 0 \mathbf{i} - 2|q_{1}| \mathbf{j} \Big] \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} \Big[ - 2|q_{1}| \mathbf{j} \Big] \\&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{E}_{net} &amp;amp;= - \frac{1}{2 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} |q_{1}| \mathbf{j} \\&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:::*&#039;&#039;&#039;A.)&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{net} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} \Big[ \big( |q_{4}| - |q_{2}| \big)\mathbf{i} - \big( |q_{1}| + |q_{3}| \big)\mathbf{j} \Big]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::*&#039;&#039;&#039;B.)&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{net} = - \frac{1}{2 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} |q_{1}| \mathbf{j}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Question&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
::A ring of evenly distributed charge of radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is centered on the origin in the xy-plane. The ring has a total charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;Show that the Electric Field due to this ring is 0 at the origin.&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricFieldDifficultExample.png|600px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Solution&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
::The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; due to a point charge is given by:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|Q|}{| \mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;} |^{2}} \frac{\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;}}{| \mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;} |}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::This equation is equivalent to the formula presented in the [[Electric Field#A Mathematical Model | Mathematical Model]]. The reason it looks so different is due to a few assumptions in the mathematical model that we have stopped using:&lt;br /&gt;
:::# The source charge is located at the origin (our ring of charge is around the origin)&lt;br /&gt;
:::# The distance between the source charge and the observing location is simply expressed as a distance &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (like in the [[Electric Field#Middling| Middling Example]]). Now, instead we will represent the distance as the magnitude of the difference in position between the source and observer &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\big( | \mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;} | \big)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
:::# Subsequently, our unit vector in the direction of the field &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\big( \hat{\mathbf{r}} \big)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is not simply expressed as a typical unit vector (like in the middling example). It has now become the vector joining the source and observer divided by the magnitude of this same vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bigg( \frac{\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;}}{| \mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;} |} \bigg) &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Another complication this problem presents is:&lt;br /&gt;
::::Where is the source charge?&lt;br /&gt;
:::To answer this, notice that the ring has an evenly distributed TOTAL charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and a radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Also, notice that the &amp;quot;source&amp;quot; position is constantly changing as you go around the ring. This issue makes it much more convenient to speak of the line charge DENSITY at a point along the ring instead of the TOTAL charge. This will allow us to treat the ring as many, many little source charges. The line charge density is simply the charge on the line divided by the length of that line (circumference), since the charge is evenly distributed about the ring:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\rho_{L} = \frac{Q}{2 \pi a}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This allows us to represent a differential amount of source charge as a product of the line charge density and a differential length:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;dQ = \rho_{L} dL&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The next question is: What is a differential length around the ring?&lt;br /&gt;
:::The differential length is a differential arc length &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(s = r \theta)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; around the circle dependent on the change in angle:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;dL = a d\theta&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
dQ &amp;amp;= \frac{Q}{2 \pi a} a d\theta \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= \frac{Q}{2 \pi} d\theta \\&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Now we can sum each of these differential source charge&#039;s contribution to the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; at the origin using an integral:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} = \int \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{\frac{Q}{2 \pi} d\theta}{| \mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;} |^{2}} \frac{\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;}}{| \mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;} |}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The only things left to find are the generic source position (a vector that can describe the position of each differential source charge along the ring) and the observer location. The observer location is given to us; the origin:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{r} = 0\mathbf{i} +0\mathbf{j} + 0\mathbf{k}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The source position is easiest to describe as a radius from the origin (polar coordinates):&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{r}^{&#039;} = a \hat{ \mathbf{a}}_{r}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat{\mathbf{a}}_{r}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a unit vector in the radial direction&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;} &amp;amp;= \big( 0\mathbf{i} +0\mathbf{j} + 0\mathbf{k} \big) - \big( a\hat{ \mathbf{a}}_{r} \big) \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= -a\hat{ \mathbf{a}}_{r} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;}| &amp;amp;= \sqrt{(-a)^{2}} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= a \\&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Plugging these into the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; integral gives:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{E} &amp;amp;= \int \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{\frac{Q}{2 \pi} d\theta}{a^2} \frac{-a \hat{ \mathbf{a}}_{r}}{a} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= - \int \frac{1}{8 {\pi}^{2} \epsilon_{0}} \frac{Q}{a^2} \hat{ \mathbf{a}}_{r} d\theta \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= - \frac{Q}{a^{2} 8 {\pi}^{2} \epsilon_{0}} \int \hat{ \mathbf{a}}_{r} d\theta \\&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\theta&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the angle from the x-axis. &lt;br /&gt;
::*To integrate over the entire ring, we set the bounds of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\theta&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;[0, 2 \pi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
::*Also, as of right now, the integral would not evaluate to 0. This is because &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat{ \mathbf{a}}_{r}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; has a hidden dependence on &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\theta&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat{ \mathbf{a}}_{r} = \text{cos}( \theta) \mathbf{i} + \text{sin}( \theta) \mathbf{j}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Plugging this information in gives:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{alignat}{3}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{E} &amp;amp;= - \frac{Q}{a^{2} 8 {\pi}^{2} \epsilon_{0}} \int_{0}^{2 \pi} \big( \text{cos}( \theta) \mathbf{i} + \text{sin}( \theta) \mathbf{j} \big) d\theta \\&lt;br /&gt;
\int_{0}^{2 \pi} \text{cos}( \theta) \mathbf{i} \ d\theta &amp;amp;= 0 \\&lt;br /&gt;
\int_{0}^{2 \pi} \text{sin}( \theta) \mathbf{j} \ d\theta &amp;amp;= 0 \\&lt;br /&gt;
\end{alignat}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} = 0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at the origin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
The real world applications of electric fields are endless. Here are some:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:electricmotor.jpg|400px|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Motors:&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Electric motors convert Electrical Energy into Mechanical Energy through &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Fields&#039;&#039;&#039;. Whenever electric motors are turned on, &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Fields&#039;&#039;&#039; are generated. This is because in order to turn an electric motor, an &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; must first be generated, which then generates a Magnetic Field, thus making the motor spin. Electric motors are used in cars, elevators, fans, refrigerators, and many more applications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Computers:&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Computers use circuits, electric fans, and transistors to work. All of these use &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Fields&#039;&#039;&#039; to push charge through a circuit, spin fans, and allow logic to be implemented in electronics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Painting:&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Fields&#039;&#039;&#039; are also used in some paintings. The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; generates charges on the surface of the material being painted on, and an opposite charge is generated on the paint. Paint that touches the material sticks, and excess paint falls off to go back into the system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Cancer Treatment:&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Recently, weak &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Fields&#039;&#039;&#039; have been used to kill cancer cells. This treatment works best for brain and breast cancers, and it has no effect on normal cells. In lab and animal tests, this treatment killed cancer cells of every type tested; however, this is still a developing treatment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Fields&#039;&#039;&#039; are created by Electric charges. The original discovery of the Electric charge is not explicitly known, but in 1675 the esteemed chemist Robert Boyle, known for Boyle&#039;s Law, discovered the attraction and repulsion of certain particles in a vacuum. Almost 100 years later in the 18th century, the American Benjamin Franklin first coined the phrases &#039;positive&#039; and &#039;negative&#039; (later developed into proton and electron) for these particles with attractive and repulsive properties. Finally, in the 19th century Michael Faraday utilized his Electrolysis process to discover the discrete nature of Electric charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
The ability to understand &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Fields&#039;&#039;&#039; helps set the basis for the introduction to [[Electric Force]] (as we discussed &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \mathbf{F}  = q\mathbf{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; ). The introduction of Electric Force will attach the specific charge of the particles with the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; that they produce, resulting in the Electric Force. Electric Force will lay the ground work for understanding the force that particles have in different systems and environments, and eventually lead to the introduction of [[Magnetic Force]].&lt;br /&gt;
The understanding of &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Fields&#039;&#039;&#039; is a doorway into many various fields, only some of which will be covered in Physics 2212. The fundamental understanding of &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Fields&#039;&#039;&#039; will prove to be very important further along when Magnetic Fields are introduced, as they share many qualities. The understanding of Electric and Magnetic Fields will be used throughout the semester to learn about various Electromagnetic concepts, and ultimately to understanding and apply Maxwell&#039;s Equations. &lt;br /&gt;
Please see related topics:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Electric Potential]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Electric Force]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Lorentz Force]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Electric Polarization]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Charged Ring]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EPIhhbwbCNc&amp;amp;list=PLX2gX-ftPVXUcMGbk1A7UbNtgadPsK5BD&amp;amp;index=9 A Youtube Playlist That Does A Great Job Going Step By Step And Reviewing Topics]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/estatics/Lesson-4/Electric-Field-Lines Further Review On Electric Field Lines.] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://phet.colorado.edu/en/simulation/charges-and-fields Get A Better Understanding Of Fields Through Hands On Manipulation In PhET. This Can Be Very Helpful For Getting An Intuitive Understanding Of Fields.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_field Wikipedia Electric Field]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://openstax.org/details/books/university-physics-volume-2 OpenStax Volume on Electricity and Magnetism]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Hayt &amp;amp; Buck 9th Edition Engineering Electromagnetics&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Matter and Interactions&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurence12799</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Field&amp;diff=38633</id>
		<title>Electric Field</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Field&amp;diff=38633"/>
		<updated>2020-03-24T21:28:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurence12799: /* A Mathematical Model */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
In this page, the concept of an &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; produced by an electric point charge will be described qualitatively and quantitatively through models, examples, and a simulation. An &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; is a useful concept to describe how any charged particle would affect charge around it through the Coulomb Force. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; of a point charge is spherically symmetric, meaning it is the same at all points of equal radius from the source. Hence, it is useful to speak of the electric field at a certain radius (not at a certain &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y,z)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; position), which will be done in [[electric Field#A Mathematical Model| the mathematical model]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Keep in mind, the electric field is a vector quantity, meaning it has a magnitude and direction. The SI units are N/C.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bigl( \mathbf{E}_{s} \bigl)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of a point source charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bigl( Q_{s} \bigl)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; gives the magnitude and direction of the Electrostatic Force vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bigl( \mathbf{F}_{s} \bigl)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; exerted on a unit charge (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; Coulomb) by &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q_{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as a function of position &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bigl( \mathbf{r} = (x,y,z) \bigl)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. More generally however, the Electrostatic Force vector exerted on any point charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bigl( q \bigl)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; by a point source charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bigl( Q_{s} \bigl)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is related to the source charge&#039;s &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; vector by:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{F}_{s} ( \mathbf{r} ) = q \mathbf{E}_{s} ( \mathbf{r} )&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This definition requires an understanding of the Electrostatic Force (Coulomb&#039;s Law), and its mathematical description. If you are not familiar with this yet, read over the [[Electric Force]] page and come back.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the Electric Force is defined as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{F}( \mathbf{r} ) = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_{o}}\frac{|q_{1} q_{2}|}{r^{2}} \hat{\mathbf{r}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\epsilon_{o}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the permittivity of free space with a value of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;8.854 \times 10^{-12} \frac{\text{C}^2}{\text{N} \cdot \text{m}^2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are point charges one and two, respectively&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the distance between the two point charges, which can also be written as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;|\mathbf{r}|&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, the magnitude of the vector connecting the two charges&#039; positions&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat{\mathbf{r}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the unit vector pointing from charge one to charge two, or from charge two to charge one, depending on whether the force on charge two or charge one is wanted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; of a source charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q_{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{E}_{s} ( \mathbf{r}) &amp;amp; = \frac{\mathbf{F}_{s} ( \mathbf{r} )}{q} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp; = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_{o}}\frac{Q_{s}}{r^{2}}\hat{\mathbf{r}}&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Radially, the magnitude of a point charge&#039;s &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; looks something like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MagnitudeofEField.jpg|center|700px|thumb|&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;2 \times 10^{-15} \ \text{C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; charge&#039;s &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; magnitude as a function of radius.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A point charge&#039;s &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; is also related to its Electric Potential. If you are unfamiliar with the idea of electric potential, then review these pages ([[Electric Field and Electric Potential]] and [[Electric Potential]]) and come back.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A charge&#039;s &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; and Electric Potential &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are related by:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = -\int_{\mathbf{b}}^{\mathbf{a}} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the potential difference between points &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{a}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{b}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is an infinitesimal length along the path between &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{a}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{b}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This relation is less useful for us unless we use a straight line approximation, such that:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
V_{ab} &amp;amp; = -\mathbf{E} \cdot \Delta \mathbf{L} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp; = - \bigl( E_{x}, E_{y}, E_{z} \bigl) \cdot \bigl( \Delta L_{x}, \Delta L_{y}, \Delta L_{z} \bigl) \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp; = - \bigl( E_{x}\Delta L_{x} + E_{y}\Delta L_{y} + E_{z}\Delta L_{z} \bigl) \\&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This leads to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} (x,y,z) = - \biggl( \frac{\Delta V_{x}}{\Delta L_{x}}, \frac{\Delta V_{y}}{\Delta L_{y}}, \frac{\Delta V_{z}}{\Delta L_{z}} \biggl)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By convention, the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; due to a positive point charge always points away from itself, and the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; of a negative point charge always points towards itself as shown below:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Posandnegefield.png|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Opposite charges will attract each other, and like charges will repel each other, as shown below:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Multiplechargeefield.png|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lastly, the Principle of Superposition is directly applicable to finding the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; due to multiple point source charges, using the a vector sum:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{E}_{sum} (\mathbf{r}) &amp;amp; = \mathbf{E}_{1} + \mathbf{E}_{2} + \mathbf{E}_{3} + \cdots + \mathbf{E}_{N} \\ &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp; = \sum_{1}^{N} \mathbf{E}_{n} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp; = \sum_{1}^{N} \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{o}} \frac{Q_{s_{n}}}{r_{n}^{2}} \hat{\mathbf{r}}_n&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::*When using this, be careful to take note that the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; of a negative charge points in the opposite direction as a positive charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Critical Formulas:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} ( \mathbf{r}) = \frac{\mathbf{F} ( \mathbf{r} )}{q}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
**&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} ( \mathbf{r}) = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_{o}}\frac{Q}{r^{2}}\hat{\mathbf{r}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
**&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} (x,y,z) = - \biggl( \frac{\Delta V_{x}}{\Delta L_{x}}, \frac{\Delta V_{y}}{\Delta L_{y}}, \frac{\Delta V_{z}}{\Delta L_{z}} \biggl)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
**&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{sum} (\mathbf{r}) = \sum_{1}^{N} \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{o}} \frac{Q_{s_{n}}}{r_{n}^{2}} \hat{\mathbf{r}}_n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:NormalEField.png|right|250px|thumb|Normal view of simulated electric field]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    ###--Create Electric Field Lines of a Positive Charge at the Origin--###&lt;br /&gt;
    #==============================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Import statements for VPython---#&lt;br /&gt;
    from __future__ import division&lt;br /&gt;
    from visual import *&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Import function used to find combinations---#&lt;br /&gt;
    from itertools import combinations&lt;br /&gt;
    #==============================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Create scene---#&lt;br /&gt;
    scene.center = vector(0,0,0)  #-Position of source charge-#&lt;br /&gt;
    scene.height = 800  #-Set height of frame of scene-#&lt;br /&gt;
    scene.width = 800  #-Set width of frame of scene-#&lt;br /&gt;
    scene.range = 4  #-Set range of scene-#&lt;br /&gt;
    scene.userzoom = 1  #-Allow user to zoom in/out: CTRL &amp;amp; move in/out on trackpad-#&lt;br /&gt;
    scene.userspin = 1  #-Allow user to rotate camera angle: SHIFT &amp;amp; OPTION &amp;amp; move around on track pad-#&lt;br /&gt;
    #==============================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Specify point charge attributes---#&lt;br /&gt;
    sourceCharge = 3*10**(-11)  #-Coulombs of charge-#&lt;br /&gt;
    sourcePos = vector(0,0,0) #-Position of source charge-#&lt;br /&gt;
    ###--Modeling source point charge as a sphere with radius 0.1 meters--###&lt;br /&gt;
    sourceObj = sphere(pos = sourcePos, radius = 0.1, color = color.cyan)&lt;br /&gt;
    #==============================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Set range (0 to 3) and possible inputs for the coordinates (0.5 step)---#&lt;br /&gt;
    ###--Many of the same number included to allow for combinations such as (1,1,1).&lt;br /&gt;
        #The itertools.combinations function will only use each element of the...&lt;br /&gt;
        #list once, starting from the beginning.&lt;br /&gt;
        #Repeating each coordinate many times with intermixing, grants...&lt;br /&gt;
    [[File:CenteredAndDistantEField.png|right|250px|thumb|Distant view of simulated electric field]]&lt;br /&gt;
        #all combinations of points, with repeats however.&lt;br /&gt;
        #Later, a for loop will be used to eliminate repeats.&lt;br /&gt;
        #This can be optimized later if need be.---------------###&lt;br /&gt;
    posXYZ = [0, -0.5, 1, -1.5, 2, -2.5, 3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, 0.5, -1, 1.5, -2, 2.5, -3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, -0.5, 1, -1.5, 2, -2.5, 3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, 0.5, -1, 1.5, -2, 2.5, -3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, -0.5, 1, -1.5, 2, -2.5, 3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, 0.5, -1, 1.5, -2, 2.5, -3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, -0.5, 1, -1.5, 2, -2.5, 3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, 0.5, -1, 1.5, -2, 2.5, -3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, -0.5, 1, -1.5, 2, -2.5, 3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, 0.5, -1, 1.5, -2, 2.5, -3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, -0.5, 1, -1.5, 2, -2.5, 3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, 0.5, -1, 1.5, -2, 2.5, -3]&lt;br /&gt;
    #==============================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:RotatedAndZoomedInEField.png|right|250px|thumb|Rotated and zoomed in view of simulated electric field]]&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Create combinations of points (x,y,z) for later use---#&lt;br /&gt;
        ###--prelimPoints will be a list of tuples of tuples--##&lt;br /&gt;
            #ie: [((,,),(,,),(,,),(,,)) , ((,,),(,,)) ,..., ((,,),(,,))]&lt;br /&gt;
    prelimPoints = [tuple(combinations(posXYZ, 3))]&lt;br /&gt;
    ###--Pull the points out of the grouping tuples and add them to a...&lt;br /&gt;
        #new list alphaPoints------------------------###&lt;br /&gt;
    alphaPoints = []&lt;br /&gt;
    for groupingTuple in prelimPoints:&lt;br /&gt;
        for XYZ in groupingTuple:&lt;br /&gt;
            if XYZ not in alphaPoints:  #-Check for repeat (x,y,z)-#&lt;br /&gt;
                alphaPoints.append(XYZ)&lt;br /&gt;
            ##--The negative of this tuple may not be in the combinations:&lt;br /&gt;
                #check to see-------------##&lt;br /&gt;
            first = -XYZ[0]&lt;br /&gt;
            second = -XYZ[1]&lt;br /&gt;
            third = -XYZ[2]&lt;br /&gt;
            negXYZ = (first, second, third)&lt;br /&gt;
            if negXYZ not in alphaPoints:&lt;br /&gt;
                alphaPoints.append(negXYZ)&lt;br /&gt;
            ##--Swap x and z coordinates for futher combination checking--##&lt;br /&gt;
            first = XYZ[2]&lt;br /&gt;
            second = XYZ[1]&lt;br /&gt;
            third = XYZ[0]&lt;br /&gt;
            reverseXYZ = (first, second, third)&lt;br /&gt;
            if reverseXYZ not in alphaPoints:&lt;br /&gt;
                alphaPoints.append(reverseXYZ)&lt;br /&gt;
            ##--The negative of the x and z coordinate swap may not be in...&lt;br /&gt;
                #the combinations: check to see---------##&lt;br /&gt;
            first = -XYZ[2]&lt;br /&gt;
            second = -XYZ[1]&lt;br /&gt;
            third = -XYZ[0]&lt;br /&gt;
            reverseXYZneg = (first, second, third)&lt;br /&gt;
            if reverseXYZneg not in alphaPoints:&lt;br /&gt;
                alphaPoints.append(reverseXYZneg)&lt;br /&gt;
            ##--Make x [3], y [0], and z [1] to check for more combinations--##&lt;br /&gt;
            first = XYZ[1]&lt;br /&gt;
            second = XYZ[2]&lt;br /&gt;
            third = XYZ[0]&lt;br /&gt;
            shiftedXYZ = (first, second, third)&lt;br /&gt;
            if shiftedXYZ not in alphaPoints:&lt;br /&gt;
                alphaPoints.append(shiftedXYZ)&lt;br /&gt;
            ##--The negative of the shifted XYZ may not be in the combinations:&lt;br /&gt;
                #check to see---------------##&lt;br /&gt;
            first = -XYZ[1]&lt;br /&gt;
            second = -XYZ[2]&lt;br /&gt;
            third = -XYZ[0]&lt;br /&gt;
            shiftedXYZneg = (first, second, third)&lt;br /&gt;
            if shiftedXYZneg not in alphaPoints:&lt;br /&gt;
                alphaPoints.append(shiftedXYZneg)&lt;br /&gt;
    ###--------This should be enough recombining---------###&lt;br /&gt;
    #================================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SideAngleAndTopViewEField.png|right|250px|thumb|Rotated top view of simulated electric field]]&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Create a new list of tuples that contain the points, magnitude,...&lt;br /&gt;
        #and direction (betaPoints)-----------#&lt;br /&gt;
            #ie: [((x,y,z), mag((x,y,z)), norm((x,y,z))),...]&lt;br /&gt;
    betaPoints = []&lt;br /&gt;
    for XYZ in alphaPoints:&lt;br /&gt;
        Mag = mag(XYZ)&lt;br /&gt;
        Dir = norm(XYZ)&lt;br /&gt;
        betaPoints.append((XYZ, Mag, Dir))&lt;br /&gt;
    #================================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Sort the tuples based on their magnitudes from least to greatest...&lt;br /&gt;
       #using sorted().&lt;br /&gt;
            #key = lamda x: x[1] tells the sorted function to sort the tuples...&lt;br /&gt;
                #based on their second component...their magnitudes--------#&lt;br /&gt;
    charliePoints = sorted(betaPoints, key = lambda x: x[1])&lt;br /&gt;
    #================================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Calculate parts of electric field equation:&lt;br /&gt;
        #E = 1/(4*pi*epsilon0) * Q/(magnitude)**2&lt;br /&gt;
    epsilonO = 8.854*(10**(-12)) #-N*(m/C)**2-#&lt;br /&gt;
    k = 1/(4*pi*(epsilonO)) #-N*(m/C)**2-#&lt;br /&gt;
    chargeContri = k*sourceCharge #-N*(m**2/C)-#&lt;br /&gt;
    #================================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Loop through points and find mag of electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
        #add it to a new list with the existing tuple info-------#&lt;br /&gt;
    deltaPoints = []&lt;br /&gt;
    for XYZ in charliePoints:&lt;br /&gt;
        try:  ###-Avoid divide by 0 error in (x,y,z) = (0,0,0)-###&lt;br /&gt;
            magEfield = chargeContri*(1/(XYZ[1])**2)&lt;br /&gt;
        except:&lt;br /&gt;
            magEfield = 0&lt;br /&gt;
        tupEfield = (XYZ[0], XYZ[1], XYZ[2], magEfield)&lt;br /&gt;
        deltaPoints.append(tupEfield)&lt;br /&gt;
    #================================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SIdeAngleAndSideViewEField.png|right|250px|thumb|Side angle of simulated electric field]]&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Loop through points and create an arrow at that point proportional in...&lt;br /&gt;
        #length to the magnitude of the electric field there.&lt;br /&gt;
        #Also, the arrow points in the direction of the electric field there.&lt;br /&gt;
        #Color coding is based on 0.25 meter increments:&lt;br /&gt;
            #stronger field = redder; weaker field = blue&lt;br /&gt;
    for XYZ in deltaPoints:&lt;br /&gt;
        if XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 0.25:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*0.5&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.000, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*0.2,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*0.25)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 0.5:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*0.7&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.200, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*0.2,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*0.25)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 1:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*0.9&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.300, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*0.2,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*0.25)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 1.25:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*1.1&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.400, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*0.2,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*0.25)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 1.5:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*1.3&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.500, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*1,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*1)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 1.75:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*1.5&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.600, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*1,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*1)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 2:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*1.7&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.700, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*1,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*1)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 2.25:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*1.9&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.800, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*1,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*1)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 2.5:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*2.1&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.900, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*1,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*1)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 2.75:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*2.3&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 1.000, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*1,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*1)&lt;br /&gt;
        else:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*2.5&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = color.blue,&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*1,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Also, at this link [https://phet.colorado.edu/en/simulation/charges-and-fields Charges and Fields] is a PhET simulation of &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Fields&#039;&#039;&#039;. Play with it if you like.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Question&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
::In the following figure, the red circles represent positive point charges, and the blue circles represent negative point charges. If the yellow arrows are meant to represent the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; due to each point charge, &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;which field(s) and charge(s) are correctly matched?&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039; (Only take into account direction)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricFieldSimpleExample.png|600px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Solution&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
::Since &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; lines always point away from a positive point charge, Option (C.) cannot be correct. Likewise, &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; lines always point towards a negative charge. Therefore, Option (A.) is also incorrect.&lt;br /&gt;
::Option (B.) shows a positive charge with an &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; pointing radially outwards. This is correct. Option (D.) shows a negative charge with an &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; pointing radially inwards. This is also correct.&lt;br /&gt;
:::&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer:&#039;&#039;&#039; Options (B.) &amp;amp; (D.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Question&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:: Four point charges &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\big(q_{1}, q_{2}, q_{3}, \text{and} \ q_{4} \big)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, are each located at a distance &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; along either the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; or &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; axes, as shown in the figure below. &lt;br /&gt;
:*&#039;&#039;&#039;A.)&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;What is the net Electric Field at the origin?&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:*&#039;&#039;&#039;B.)&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;If &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\ |q_{3}| = |q_{1}| \ \text{and} \ |q_{4}| = |q_{2}|&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; what does the Electric Field at the origin reduce to?&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricFieldMiddlingExample.png|600px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Solution&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:*&#039;&#039;&#039;A.)&#039;&#039;&#039; To find the net &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; at the origin, we must first find the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; due to each charge at the origin. &lt;br /&gt;
::*Starting with &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, its general &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; can be described as:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{1} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{1}|}{r_{1}^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}}_{1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is measured relative to the location of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
::::The origin is a distance &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; away from &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, which is along the y-axis. Since it is a positive charge, its &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; at the origin will point &amp;quot;down&amp;quot; the y-axis (away from the charge):&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{1} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{1}|}{d^2} (-\mathbf{j})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{j}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the unit vector in the y-direction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*For &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; we have:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{2} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{2}|}{r_{2}^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}}_{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is measured relative to the location of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
::::The origin is a distance &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; away from &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, which is along the x-axis. Since it is a positive charge, its &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; at the origin will point to the left (away from the charge):&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{2} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{2}|}{d^2} (-\mathbf{i})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{i}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the unit vector in the x-direction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*For &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; we have:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{3} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{3}|}{r_{3}^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}}_{3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is measured relative to the location of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
::::The origin is a distance &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; away from &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, which is along the y-axis. Since it is a negative charge, its &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; at the origin will point &amp;quot;down&amp;quot; the y-axis (towards the charge):&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{3} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{3}|}{d^2} (-\mathbf{j})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{j}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the same unit vector in the y-direction from earlier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*For &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{4}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the electric field is:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{4} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{4}|}{r_{4}^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}}_{4}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{4}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is measured relative to the location of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{4}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
::::The origin is a distance &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; away from &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{4}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, which is along the x-axis. Since it is a positive charge, its &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; at the origin will point to the right (away from the charge):&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{4} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{4}|}{d^2} (\mathbf{i})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{i}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the same unit vector in the x-direction from earlier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Now that we have the four &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Fields&#039;&#039;&#039; present at the origin, we can use the Principle of Superposition to find the &#039;&#039;&#039;net&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; at the origin:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{E}_{net} &amp;amp;= \mathbf{E}_{1} + \mathbf{E}_{2} + \mathbf{E}_{3} + \mathbf{E}_{4} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{1}|}{d^2} (-\mathbf{j}) + \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{2}|}{d^2} (-\mathbf{i}) + \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{3}|}{d^2} (-\mathbf{j}) + \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{4}|}{d^2} (\mathbf{i}) \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} \Big[ -|q_{1}| \mathbf{j} -|q_{2}| \mathbf{i} -|q_{3}| \mathbf{j} + |q_{4}| \mathbf{i} \Big] \\&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{E}_{net} &amp;amp;= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} \Big[ \big( |q_{4}| - |q_{2}| \big)\mathbf{i} - \big( |q_{1}| + |q_{3}| \big)\mathbf{j} \Big]&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricFieldMiddlingExampleAnswer.png|400px|right|thumb|Part &#039;&#039;&#039;(B)&#039;&#039;&#039; answer]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*&#039;&#039;&#039;B.)&#039;&#039;&#039; We will simply plug in the specified values into our answer from &#039;&#039;&#039;(A)&#039;&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{E}_{net} &amp;amp;= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} \Big[ \big( |q_{4}| - |q_{2}| \big)\mathbf{i} - \big( |q_{1}| + |q_{3}| \big)\mathbf{j} \Big] \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} \Big[ \big( |q_{2}| - |q_{2}| \big)\mathbf{i} - \big( |q_{1}| + |q_{1}| \big)\mathbf{j} \Big] \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} \Big[ 0 \mathbf{i} - 2|q_{1}| \mathbf{j} \Big] \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} \Big[ - 2|q_{1}| \mathbf{j} \Big] \\&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{E}_{net} &amp;amp;= - \frac{1}{2 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} |q_{1}| \mathbf{j} \\&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:::*&#039;&#039;&#039;A.)&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{net} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} \Big[ \big( |q_{4}| - |q_{2}| \big)\mathbf{i} - \big( |q_{1}| + |q_{3}| \big)\mathbf{j} \Big]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::*&#039;&#039;&#039;B.)&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{net} = - \frac{1}{2 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} |q_{1}| \mathbf{j}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Question&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
::A ring of evenly distributed charge of radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is centered on the origin in the xy-plane. The ring has a total charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;Show that the Electric Field due to this ring is 0 at the origin.&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricFieldDifficultExample.png|600px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Solution&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
::The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; due to a point charge is given by:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|Q|}{| \mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;} |^{2}} \frac{\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;}}{| \mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;} |}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::This equation is equivalent to the formula presented in the [[Electric Field#A Mathematical Model | Mathematical Model]]. The reason it looks so different is due to a few assumptions in the mathematical model that we have stopped using:&lt;br /&gt;
:::# The source charge is located at the origin (our ring of charge is around the origin)&lt;br /&gt;
:::# The distance between the source charge and the observing location is simply expressed as a distance &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (like in the [[Electric Field#Middling| Middling Example]]). Now, instead we will represent the distance as the magnitude of the difference in position between the source and observer &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\big( | \mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;} | \big)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
:::# Subsequently, our unit vector in the direction of the field &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\big( \hat{\mathbf{r}} \big)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is not simply expressed as a typical unit vector (like in the middling example). It has now become the vector joining the source and observer divided by the magnitude of this same vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bigg( \frac{\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;}}{| \mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;} |} \bigg) &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Another complication this problem presents is:&lt;br /&gt;
::::Where is the source charge?&lt;br /&gt;
:::To answer this, notice that the ring has an evenly distributed TOTAL charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and a radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Also, notice that the &amp;quot;source&amp;quot; position is constantly changing as you go around the ring. This issue makes it much more convenient to speak of the line charge DENSITY at a point along the ring instead of the TOTAL charge. This will allow us to treat the ring as many, many little source charges. The line charge density is simply the charge on the line divided by the length of that line (circumference), since the charge is evenly distributed about the ring:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\rho_{L} = \frac{Q}{2 \pi a}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This allows us to represent a differential amount of source charge as a product of the line charge density and a differential length:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;dQ = \rho_{L} dL&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The next question is: What is a differential length around the ring?&lt;br /&gt;
:::The differential length is a differential arc length &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(s = r \theta)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; around the circle dependent on the change in angle:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;dL = a d\theta&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
dQ &amp;amp;= \frac{Q}{2 \pi a} a d\theta \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= \frac{Q}{2 \pi} d\theta \\&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Now we can sum each of these differential source charge&#039;s contribution to the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; at the origin using an integral:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} = \int \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{\frac{Q}{2 \pi} d\theta}{| \mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;} |^{2}} \frac{\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;}}{| \mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;} |}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The only things left to find are the generic source position (a vector that can describe the position of each differential source charge along the ring) and the observer location. The observer location is given to us; the origin:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{r} = 0\mathbf{i} +0\mathbf{j} + 0\mathbf{k}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The source position is easiest to describe as a radius from the origin (polar coordinates):&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{r}^{&#039;} = a \hat{ \mathbf{a}}_{r}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat{\mathbf{a}}_{r}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a unit vector in the radial direction&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;} &amp;amp;= \big( 0\mathbf{i} +0\mathbf{j} + 0\mathbf{k} \big) - \big( a\hat{ \mathbf{a}}_{r} \big) \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= -a\hat{ \mathbf{a}}_{r} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;}| &amp;amp;= \sqrt{(-a)^{2}} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= a \\&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Plugging these into the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; integral gives:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{E} &amp;amp;= \int \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{\frac{Q}{2 \pi} d\theta}{a^2} \frac{-a \hat{ \mathbf{a}}_{r}}{a} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= - \int \frac{1}{8 {\pi}^{2} \epsilon_{0}} \frac{Q}{a^2} \hat{ \mathbf{a}}_{r} d\theta \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= - \frac{Q}{a^{2} 8 {\pi}^{2} \epsilon_{0}} \int \hat{ \mathbf{a}}_{r} d\theta \\&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\theta&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the angle from the x-axis. &lt;br /&gt;
::*To integrate over the entire ring, we set the bounds of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\theta&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;[0, 2 \pi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
::*Also, as of right now, the integral would not evaluate to 0. This is because &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat{ \mathbf{a}}_{r}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; has a hidden dependence on &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\theta&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat{ \mathbf{a}}_{r} = \text{cos}( \theta) \mathbf{i} + \text{sin}( \theta) \mathbf{j}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Plugging this information in gives:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{alignat}{3}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{E} &amp;amp;= - \frac{Q}{a^{2} 8 {\pi}^{2} \epsilon_{0}} \int_{0}^{2 \pi} \big( \text{cos}( \theta) \mathbf{i} + \text{sin}( \theta) \mathbf{j} \big) d\theta \\&lt;br /&gt;
\int_{0}^{2 \pi} \text{cos}( \theta) \mathbf{i} \ d\theta &amp;amp;= 0 \\&lt;br /&gt;
\int_{0}^{2 \pi} \text{sin}( \theta) \mathbf{j} \ d\theta &amp;amp;= 0 \\&lt;br /&gt;
\end{alignat}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} = 0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at the origin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
The real world applications of electric fields are endless. Here are some:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:electricmotor.jpg|400px|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Motors:&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Electric motors convert Electrical Energy into Mechanical Energy through &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Fields&#039;&#039;&#039;. Whenever electric motors are turned on, &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Fields&#039;&#039;&#039; are generated. This is because in order to turn an electric motor, an &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; must first be generated, which then generates a Magnetic Field, thus making the motor spin. Electric motors are used in cars, elevators, fans, refrigerators, and many more applications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Computers:&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Computers use circuits, electric fans, and transistors to work. All of these use &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Fields&#039;&#039;&#039; to push charge through a circuit, spin fans, and allow logic to be implemented in electronics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Painting:&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Fields&#039;&#039;&#039; are also used in some paintings. The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; generates charges on the surface of the material being painted on, and an opposite charge is generated on the paint. Paint that touches the material sticks, and excess paint falls off to go back into the system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Cancer Treatment:&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Recently, weak &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Fields&#039;&#039;&#039; have been used to kill cancer cells. This treatment works best for brain and breast cancers, and it has no effect on normal cells. In lab and animal tests, this treatment killed cancer cells of every type tested; however, this is still a developing treatment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Fields&#039;&#039;&#039; are created by Electric charges. The original discovery of the Electric charge is not explicitly known, but in 1675 the esteemed chemist Robert Boyle, known for Boyle&#039;s Law, discovered the attraction and repulsion of certain particles in a vacuum. Almost 100 years later in the 18th century, the American Benjamin Franklin first coined the phrases &#039;positive&#039; and &#039;negative&#039; (later developed into proton and electron) for these particles with attractive and repulsive properties. Finally, in the 19th century Michael Faraday utilized his Electrolysis process to discover the discrete nature of Electric charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
The ability to understand &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Fields&#039;&#039;&#039; helps set the basis for the introduction to [[Electric Force]] (as we discussed &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \mathbf{F}  = q\mathbf{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; ). The introduction of Electric Force will attach the specific charge of the particles with the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; that they produce, resulting in the Electric Force. Electric Force will lay the ground work for understanding the force that particles have in different systems and environments, and eventually lead to the introduction of [[Magnetic Force]].&lt;br /&gt;
The understanding of &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Fields&#039;&#039;&#039; is a doorway into many various fields, only some of which will be covered in Physics 2212. The fundamental understanding of &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Fields&#039;&#039;&#039; will prove to be very important further along when Magnetic Fields are introduced, as they share many qualities. The understanding of Electric and Magnetic Fields will be used throughout the semester to learn about various Electromagnetic concepts, and ultimately to understanding and apply Maxwell&#039;s Equations. &lt;br /&gt;
Please see related topics:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Electric Potential]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Electric Force]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Lorentz Force]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Electric Polarization]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Charged Ring]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EPIhhbwbCNc&amp;amp;list=PLX2gX-ftPVXUcMGbk1A7UbNtgadPsK5BD&amp;amp;index=9 A Youtube Playlist That Does A Great Job Going Step By Step And Reviewing Topics]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/estatics/Lesson-4/Electric-Field-Lines Further Review On Electric Field Lines.] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://phet.colorado.edu/en/simulation/charges-and-fields Get A Better Understanding Of Fields Through Hands On Manipulation In PhET. This Can Be Very Helpful For Getting An Intuitive Understanding Of Fields.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_field Wikipedia Electric Field]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://openstax.org/details/books/university-physics-volume-2 OpenStax Volume on Electricity and Magnetism]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Hayt &amp;amp; Buck 9th Edition Engineering Electromagnetics&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Matter and Interactions&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurence12799</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Field&amp;diff=38632</id>
		<title>Electric Field</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Field&amp;diff=38632"/>
		<updated>2020-03-24T21:28:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurence12799: /* A Mathematical Model */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
In this page, the concept of an &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; produced by an electric point charge will be described qualitatively and quantitatively through models, examples, and a simulation. An &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; is a useful concept to describe how any charged particle would affect charge around it through the Coulomb Force. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; of a point charge is spherically symmetric, meaning it is the same at all points of equal radius from the source. Hence, it is useful to speak of the electric field at a certain radius (not at a certain &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y,z)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; position), which will be done in [[electric Field#A Mathematical Model| the mathematical model]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Keep in mind, the electric field is a vector quantity, meaning it has a magnitude and direction. The SI units are N/C.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bigl( \mathbf{E}_{s} \bigl)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of a point source charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bigl( Q_{s} \bigl)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; gives the magnitude and direction of the Electrostatic Force vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bigl( \mathbf{F}_{s} \bigl)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; exerted on a unit charge (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; Coulomb) by &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q_{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as a function of position &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bigl( \mathbf{r} = (x,y,z) \bigl)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. More generally however, the Electrostatic Force vector exerted on any point charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bigl( q \bigl)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; by a point source charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bigl( Q_{s} \bigl)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is related to the source charge&#039;s &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; vector by:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{F}_{s} ( \mathbf{r} ) = q \mathbf{E}_{s} ( \mathbf{r} )&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This definition requires an understanding of the Electrostatic Force (Coulomb&#039;s Law), and its mathematical description. If you are not familiar with this yet, read over the [[Electric Force]] page and come back.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the Electric Force is defined as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{F}( \mathbf{r} ) = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_{o}}\frac{|q_{1} q_{2}|}{r^{2}} \hat{\mathbf{r}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\epsilon_{o}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the permittivity of free space with a value of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;8.854 \times 10^{-12} \frac{\text{C}^2}{\text{N} \cdot \text{m}^2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are point charges one and two, respectively&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the distance between the two point charges, which can also be written as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;|\mathbf{r}|&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, the magnitude of the vector connecting the two charges&#039; positions&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat{\mathbf{r}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the unit vector pointing from charge one to charge two, or from charge two to charge one, depending on whether the force on charge two or charge one is wanted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; of a source charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q_{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{E}_{s} ( \mathbf{r}) &amp;amp; = \frac{\mathbf{F}_{s} ( \mathbf{r} )}{|q|} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp; = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_{o}}\frac{Q_{s}}{r^{2}}\hat{\mathbf{r}}&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Radially, the magnitude of a point charge&#039;s &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; looks something like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MagnitudeofEField.jpg|center|700px|thumb|&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;2 \times 10^{-15} \ \text{C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; charge&#039;s &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; magnitude as a function of radius.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A point charge&#039;s &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; is also related to its Electric Potential. If you are unfamiliar with the idea of electric potential, then review these pages ([[Electric Field and Electric Potential]] and [[Electric Potential]]) and come back.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A charge&#039;s &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; and Electric Potential &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are related by:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = -\int_{\mathbf{b}}^{\mathbf{a}} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the potential difference between points &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{a}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{b}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is an infinitesimal length along the path between &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{a}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{b}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This relation is less useful for us unless we use a straight line approximation, such that:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
V_{ab} &amp;amp; = -\mathbf{E} \cdot \Delta \mathbf{L} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp; = - \bigl( E_{x}, E_{y}, E_{z} \bigl) \cdot \bigl( \Delta L_{x}, \Delta L_{y}, \Delta L_{z} \bigl) \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp; = - \bigl( E_{x}\Delta L_{x} + E_{y}\Delta L_{y} + E_{z}\Delta L_{z} \bigl) \\&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This leads to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} (x,y,z) = - \biggl( \frac{\Delta V_{x}}{\Delta L_{x}}, \frac{\Delta V_{y}}{\Delta L_{y}}, \frac{\Delta V_{z}}{\Delta L_{z}} \biggl)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By convention, the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; due to a positive point charge always points away from itself, and the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; of a negative point charge always points towards itself as shown below:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Posandnegefield.png|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Opposite charges will attract each other, and like charges will repel each other, as shown below:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Multiplechargeefield.png|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lastly, the Principle of Superposition is directly applicable to finding the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; due to multiple point source charges, using the a vector sum:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{E}_{sum} (\mathbf{r}) &amp;amp; = \mathbf{E}_{1} + \mathbf{E}_{2} + \mathbf{E}_{3} + \cdots + \mathbf{E}_{N} \\ &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp; = \sum_{1}^{N} \mathbf{E}_{n} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp; = \sum_{1}^{N} \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{o}} \frac{Q_{s_{n}}}{r_{n}^{2}} \hat{\mathbf{r}}_n&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::*When using this, be careful to take note that the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; of a negative charge points in the opposite direction as a positive charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Critical Formulas:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} ( \mathbf{r}) = \frac{\mathbf{F} ( \mathbf{r} )}{q}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
**&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} ( \mathbf{r}) = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_{o}}\frac{Q}{r^{2}}\hat{\mathbf{r}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
**&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} (x,y,z) = - \biggl( \frac{\Delta V_{x}}{\Delta L_{x}}, \frac{\Delta V_{y}}{\Delta L_{y}}, \frac{\Delta V_{z}}{\Delta L_{z}} \biggl)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
**&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{sum} (\mathbf{r}) = \sum_{1}^{N} \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{o}} \frac{Q_{s_{n}}}{r_{n}^{2}} \hat{\mathbf{r}}_n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:NormalEField.png|right|250px|thumb|Normal view of simulated electric field]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    ###--Create Electric Field Lines of a Positive Charge at the Origin--###&lt;br /&gt;
    #==============================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Import statements for VPython---#&lt;br /&gt;
    from __future__ import division&lt;br /&gt;
    from visual import *&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Import function used to find combinations---#&lt;br /&gt;
    from itertools import combinations&lt;br /&gt;
    #==============================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Create scene---#&lt;br /&gt;
    scene.center = vector(0,0,0)  #-Position of source charge-#&lt;br /&gt;
    scene.height = 800  #-Set height of frame of scene-#&lt;br /&gt;
    scene.width = 800  #-Set width of frame of scene-#&lt;br /&gt;
    scene.range = 4  #-Set range of scene-#&lt;br /&gt;
    scene.userzoom = 1  #-Allow user to zoom in/out: CTRL &amp;amp; move in/out on trackpad-#&lt;br /&gt;
    scene.userspin = 1  #-Allow user to rotate camera angle: SHIFT &amp;amp; OPTION &amp;amp; move around on track pad-#&lt;br /&gt;
    #==============================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Specify point charge attributes---#&lt;br /&gt;
    sourceCharge = 3*10**(-11)  #-Coulombs of charge-#&lt;br /&gt;
    sourcePos = vector(0,0,0) #-Position of source charge-#&lt;br /&gt;
    ###--Modeling source point charge as a sphere with radius 0.1 meters--###&lt;br /&gt;
    sourceObj = sphere(pos = sourcePos, radius = 0.1, color = color.cyan)&lt;br /&gt;
    #==============================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Set range (0 to 3) and possible inputs for the coordinates (0.5 step)---#&lt;br /&gt;
    ###--Many of the same number included to allow for combinations such as (1,1,1).&lt;br /&gt;
        #The itertools.combinations function will only use each element of the...&lt;br /&gt;
        #list once, starting from the beginning.&lt;br /&gt;
        #Repeating each coordinate many times with intermixing, grants...&lt;br /&gt;
    [[File:CenteredAndDistantEField.png|right|250px|thumb|Distant view of simulated electric field]]&lt;br /&gt;
        #all combinations of points, with repeats however.&lt;br /&gt;
        #Later, a for loop will be used to eliminate repeats.&lt;br /&gt;
        #This can be optimized later if need be.---------------###&lt;br /&gt;
    posXYZ = [0, -0.5, 1, -1.5, 2, -2.5, 3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, 0.5, -1, 1.5, -2, 2.5, -3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, -0.5, 1, -1.5, 2, -2.5, 3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, 0.5, -1, 1.5, -2, 2.5, -3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, -0.5, 1, -1.5, 2, -2.5, 3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, 0.5, -1, 1.5, -2, 2.5, -3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, -0.5, 1, -1.5, 2, -2.5, 3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, 0.5, -1, 1.5, -2, 2.5, -3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, -0.5, 1, -1.5, 2, -2.5, 3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, 0.5, -1, 1.5, -2, 2.5, -3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, -0.5, 1, -1.5, 2, -2.5, 3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, 0.5, -1, 1.5, -2, 2.5, -3]&lt;br /&gt;
    #==============================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:RotatedAndZoomedInEField.png|right|250px|thumb|Rotated and zoomed in view of simulated electric field]]&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Create combinations of points (x,y,z) for later use---#&lt;br /&gt;
        ###--prelimPoints will be a list of tuples of tuples--##&lt;br /&gt;
            #ie: [((,,),(,,),(,,),(,,)) , ((,,),(,,)) ,..., ((,,),(,,))]&lt;br /&gt;
    prelimPoints = [tuple(combinations(posXYZ, 3))]&lt;br /&gt;
    ###--Pull the points out of the grouping tuples and add them to a...&lt;br /&gt;
        #new list alphaPoints------------------------###&lt;br /&gt;
    alphaPoints = []&lt;br /&gt;
    for groupingTuple in prelimPoints:&lt;br /&gt;
        for XYZ in groupingTuple:&lt;br /&gt;
            if XYZ not in alphaPoints:  #-Check for repeat (x,y,z)-#&lt;br /&gt;
                alphaPoints.append(XYZ)&lt;br /&gt;
            ##--The negative of this tuple may not be in the combinations:&lt;br /&gt;
                #check to see-------------##&lt;br /&gt;
            first = -XYZ[0]&lt;br /&gt;
            second = -XYZ[1]&lt;br /&gt;
            third = -XYZ[2]&lt;br /&gt;
            negXYZ = (first, second, third)&lt;br /&gt;
            if negXYZ not in alphaPoints:&lt;br /&gt;
                alphaPoints.append(negXYZ)&lt;br /&gt;
            ##--Swap x and z coordinates for futher combination checking--##&lt;br /&gt;
            first = XYZ[2]&lt;br /&gt;
            second = XYZ[1]&lt;br /&gt;
            third = XYZ[0]&lt;br /&gt;
            reverseXYZ = (first, second, third)&lt;br /&gt;
            if reverseXYZ not in alphaPoints:&lt;br /&gt;
                alphaPoints.append(reverseXYZ)&lt;br /&gt;
            ##--The negative of the x and z coordinate swap may not be in...&lt;br /&gt;
                #the combinations: check to see---------##&lt;br /&gt;
            first = -XYZ[2]&lt;br /&gt;
            second = -XYZ[1]&lt;br /&gt;
            third = -XYZ[0]&lt;br /&gt;
            reverseXYZneg = (first, second, third)&lt;br /&gt;
            if reverseXYZneg not in alphaPoints:&lt;br /&gt;
                alphaPoints.append(reverseXYZneg)&lt;br /&gt;
            ##--Make x [3], y [0], and z [1] to check for more combinations--##&lt;br /&gt;
            first = XYZ[1]&lt;br /&gt;
            second = XYZ[2]&lt;br /&gt;
            third = XYZ[0]&lt;br /&gt;
            shiftedXYZ = (first, second, third)&lt;br /&gt;
            if shiftedXYZ not in alphaPoints:&lt;br /&gt;
                alphaPoints.append(shiftedXYZ)&lt;br /&gt;
            ##--The negative of the shifted XYZ may not be in the combinations:&lt;br /&gt;
                #check to see---------------##&lt;br /&gt;
            first = -XYZ[1]&lt;br /&gt;
            second = -XYZ[2]&lt;br /&gt;
            third = -XYZ[0]&lt;br /&gt;
            shiftedXYZneg = (first, second, third)&lt;br /&gt;
            if shiftedXYZneg not in alphaPoints:&lt;br /&gt;
                alphaPoints.append(shiftedXYZneg)&lt;br /&gt;
    ###--------This should be enough recombining---------###&lt;br /&gt;
    #================================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SideAngleAndTopViewEField.png|right|250px|thumb|Rotated top view of simulated electric field]]&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Create a new list of tuples that contain the points, magnitude,...&lt;br /&gt;
        #and direction (betaPoints)-----------#&lt;br /&gt;
            #ie: [((x,y,z), mag((x,y,z)), norm((x,y,z))),...]&lt;br /&gt;
    betaPoints = []&lt;br /&gt;
    for XYZ in alphaPoints:&lt;br /&gt;
        Mag = mag(XYZ)&lt;br /&gt;
        Dir = norm(XYZ)&lt;br /&gt;
        betaPoints.append((XYZ, Mag, Dir))&lt;br /&gt;
    #================================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Sort the tuples based on their magnitudes from least to greatest...&lt;br /&gt;
       #using sorted().&lt;br /&gt;
            #key = lamda x: x[1] tells the sorted function to sort the tuples...&lt;br /&gt;
                #based on their second component...their magnitudes--------#&lt;br /&gt;
    charliePoints = sorted(betaPoints, key = lambda x: x[1])&lt;br /&gt;
    #================================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Calculate parts of electric field equation:&lt;br /&gt;
        #E = 1/(4*pi*epsilon0) * Q/(magnitude)**2&lt;br /&gt;
    epsilonO = 8.854*(10**(-12)) #-N*(m/C)**2-#&lt;br /&gt;
    k = 1/(4*pi*(epsilonO)) #-N*(m/C)**2-#&lt;br /&gt;
    chargeContri = k*sourceCharge #-N*(m**2/C)-#&lt;br /&gt;
    #================================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Loop through points and find mag of electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
        #add it to a new list with the existing tuple info-------#&lt;br /&gt;
    deltaPoints = []&lt;br /&gt;
    for XYZ in charliePoints:&lt;br /&gt;
        try:  ###-Avoid divide by 0 error in (x,y,z) = (0,0,0)-###&lt;br /&gt;
            magEfield = chargeContri*(1/(XYZ[1])**2)&lt;br /&gt;
        except:&lt;br /&gt;
            magEfield = 0&lt;br /&gt;
        tupEfield = (XYZ[0], XYZ[1], XYZ[2], magEfield)&lt;br /&gt;
        deltaPoints.append(tupEfield)&lt;br /&gt;
    #================================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SIdeAngleAndSideViewEField.png|right|250px|thumb|Side angle of simulated electric field]]&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Loop through points and create an arrow at that point proportional in...&lt;br /&gt;
        #length to the magnitude of the electric field there.&lt;br /&gt;
        #Also, the arrow points in the direction of the electric field there.&lt;br /&gt;
        #Color coding is based on 0.25 meter increments:&lt;br /&gt;
            #stronger field = redder; weaker field = blue&lt;br /&gt;
    for XYZ in deltaPoints:&lt;br /&gt;
        if XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 0.25:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*0.5&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.000, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*0.2,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*0.25)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 0.5:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*0.7&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.200, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*0.2,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*0.25)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 1:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*0.9&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.300, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*0.2,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*0.25)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 1.25:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*1.1&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.400, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*0.2,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*0.25)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 1.5:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*1.3&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.500, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*1,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*1)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 1.75:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*1.5&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.600, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*1,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*1)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 2:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*1.7&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.700, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*1,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*1)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 2.25:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*1.9&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.800, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*1,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*1)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 2.5:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*2.1&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.900, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*1,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*1)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 2.75:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*2.3&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 1.000, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*1,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*1)&lt;br /&gt;
        else:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*2.5&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = color.blue,&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*1,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Also, at this link [https://phet.colorado.edu/en/simulation/charges-and-fields Charges and Fields] is a PhET simulation of &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Fields&#039;&#039;&#039;. Play with it if you like.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Question&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
::In the following figure, the red circles represent positive point charges, and the blue circles represent negative point charges. If the yellow arrows are meant to represent the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; due to each point charge, &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;which field(s) and charge(s) are correctly matched?&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039; (Only take into account direction)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricFieldSimpleExample.png|600px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Solution&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
::Since &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; lines always point away from a positive point charge, Option (C.) cannot be correct. Likewise, &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; lines always point towards a negative charge. Therefore, Option (A.) is also incorrect.&lt;br /&gt;
::Option (B.) shows a positive charge with an &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; pointing radially outwards. This is correct. Option (D.) shows a negative charge with an &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; pointing radially inwards. This is also correct.&lt;br /&gt;
:::&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer:&#039;&#039;&#039; Options (B.) &amp;amp; (D.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Question&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:: Four point charges &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\big(q_{1}, q_{2}, q_{3}, \text{and} \ q_{4} \big)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, are each located at a distance &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; along either the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; or &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; axes, as shown in the figure below. &lt;br /&gt;
:*&#039;&#039;&#039;A.)&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;What is the net Electric Field at the origin?&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:*&#039;&#039;&#039;B.)&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;If &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\ |q_{3}| = |q_{1}| \ \text{and} \ |q_{4}| = |q_{2}|&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; what does the Electric Field at the origin reduce to?&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricFieldMiddlingExample.png|600px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Solution&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:*&#039;&#039;&#039;A.)&#039;&#039;&#039; To find the net &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; at the origin, we must first find the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; due to each charge at the origin. &lt;br /&gt;
::*Starting with &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, its general &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; can be described as:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{1} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{1}|}{r_{1}^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}}_{1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is measured relative to the location of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
::::The origin is a distance &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; away from &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, which is along the y-axis. Since it is a positive charge, its &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; at the origin will point &amp;quot;down&amp;quot; the y-axis (away from the charge):&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{1} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{1}|}{d^2} (-\mathbf{j})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{j}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the unit vector in the y-direction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*For &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; we have:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{2} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{2}|}{r_{2}^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}}_{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is measured relative to the location of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
::::The origin is a distance &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; away from &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, which is along the x-axis. Since it is a positive charge, its &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; at the origin will point to the left (away from the charge):&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{2} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{2}|}{d^2} (-\mathbf{i})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{i}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the unit vector in the x-direction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*For &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; we have:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{3} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{3}|}{r_{3}^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}}_{3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is measured relative to the location of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
::::The origin is a distance &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; away from &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, which is along the y-axis. Since it is a negative charge, its &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; at the origin will point &amp;quot;down&amp;quot; the y-axis (towards the charge):&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{3} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{3}|}{d^2} (-\mathbf{j})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{j}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the same unit vector in the y-direction from earlier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*For &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{4}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the electric field is:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{4} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{4}|}{r_{4}^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}}_{4}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{4}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is measured relative to the location of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{4}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
::::The origin is a distance &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; away from &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{4}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, which is along the x-axis. Since it is a positive charge, its &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; at the origin will point to the right (away from the charge):&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{4} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{4}|}{d^2} (\mathbf{i})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{i}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the same unit vector in the x-direction from earlier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Now that we have the four &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Fields&#039;&#039;&#039; present at the origin, we can use the Principle of Superposition to find the &#039;&#039;&#039;net&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; at the origin:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{E}_{net} &amp;amp;= \mathbf{E}_{1} + \mathbf{E}_{2} + \mathbf{E}_{3} + \mathbf{E}_{4} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{1}|}{d^2} (-\mathbf{j}) + \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{2}|}{d^2} (-\mathbf{i}) + \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{3}|}{d^2} (-\mathbf{j}) + \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{4}|}{d^2} (\mathbf{i}) \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} \Big[ -|q_{1}| \mathbf{j} -|q_{2}| \mathbf{i} -|q_{3}| \mathbf{j} + |q_{4}| \mathbf{i} \Big] \\&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{E}_{net} &amp;amp;= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} \Big[ \big( |q_{4}| - |q_{2}| \big)\mathbf{i} - \big( |q_{1}| + |q_{3}| \big)\mathbf{j} \Big]&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricFieldMiddlingExampleAnswer.png|400px|right|thumb|Part &#039;&#039;&#039;(B)&#039;&#039;&#039; answer]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*&#039;&#039;&#039;B.)&#039;&#039;&#039; We will simply plug in the specified values into our answer from &#039;&#039;&#039;(A)&#039;&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{E}_{net} &amp;amp;= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} \Big[ \big( |q_{4}| - |q_{2}| \big)\mathbf{i} - \big( |q_{1}| + |q_{3}| \big)\mathbf{j} \Big] \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} \Big[ \big( |q_{2}| - |q_{2}| \big)\mathbf{i} - \big( |q_{1}| + |q_{1}| \big)\mathbf{j} \Big] \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} \Big[ 0 \mathbf{i} - 2|q_{1}| \mathbf{j} \Big] \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} \Big[ - 2|q_{1}| \mathbf{j} \Big] \\&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{E}_{net} &amp;amp;= - \frac{1}{2 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} |q_{1}| \mathbf{j} \\&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:::*&#039;&#039;&#039;A.)&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{net} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} \Big[ \big( |q_{4}| - |q_{2}| \big)\mathbf{i} - \big( |q_{1}| + |q_{3}| \big)\mathbf{j} \Big]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::*&#039;&#039;&#039;B.)&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{net} = - \frac{1}{2 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} |q_{1}| \mathbf{j}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Question&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
::A ring of evenly distributed charge of radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is centered on the origin in the xy-plane. The ring has a total charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;Show that the Electric Field due to this ring is 0 at the origin.&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricFieldDifficultExample.png|600px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Solution&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
::The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; due to a point charge is given by:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|Q|}{| \mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;} |^{2}} \frac{\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;}}{| \mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;} |}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::This equation is equivalent to the formula presented in the [[Electric Field#A Mathematical Model | Mathematical Model]]. The reason it looks so different is due to a few assumptions in the mathematical model that we have stopped using:&lt;br /&gt;
:::# The source charge is located at the origin (our ring of charge is around the origin)&lt;br /&gt;
:::# The distance between the source charge and the observing location is simply expressed as a distance &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (like in the [[Electric Field#Middling| Middling Example]]). Now, instead we will represent the distance as the magnitude of the difference in position between the source and observer &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\big( | \mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;} | \big)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
:::# Subsequently, our unit vector in the direction of the field &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\big( \hat{\mathbf{r}} \big)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is not simply expressed as a typical unit vector (like in the middling example). It has now become the vector joining the source and observer divided by the magnitude of this same vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bigg( \frac{\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;}}{| \mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;} |} \bigg) &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Another complication this problem presents is:&lt;br /&gt;
::::Where is the source charge?&lt;br /&gt;
:::To answer this, notice that the ring has an evenly distributed TOTAL charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and a radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Also, notice that the &amp;quot;source&amp;quot; position is constantly changing as you go around the ring. This issue makes it much more convenient to speak of the line charge DENSITY at a point along the ring instead of the TOTAL charge. This will allow us to treat the ring as many, many little source charges. The line charge density is simply the charge on the line divided by the length of that line (circumference), since the charge is evenly distributed about the ring:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\rho_{L} = \frac{Q}{2 \pi a}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This allows us to represent a differential amount of source charge as a product of the line charge density and a differential length:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;dQ = \rho_{L} dL&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The next question is: What is a differential length around the ring?&lt;br /&gt;
:::The differential length is a differential arc length &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(s = r \theta)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; around the circle dependent on the change in angle:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;dL = a d\theta&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
dQ &amp;amp;= \frac{Q}{2 \pi a} a d\theta \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= \frac{Q}{2 \pi} d\theta \\&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Now we can sum each of these differential source charge&#039;s contribution to the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; at the origin using an integral:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} = \int \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{\frac{Q}{2 \pi} d\theta}{| \mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;} |^{2}} \frac{\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;}}{| \mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;} |}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The only things left to find are the generic source position (a vector that can describe the position of each differential source charge along the ring) and the observer location. The observer location is given to us; the origin:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{r} = 0\mathbf{i} +0\mathbf{j} + 0\mathbf{k}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The source position is easiest to describe as a radius from the origin (polar coordinates):&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{r}^{&#039;} = a \hat{ \mathbf{a}}_{r}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat{\mathbf{a}}_{r}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a unit vector in the radial direction&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;} &amp;amp;= \big( 0\mathbf{i} +0\mathbf{j} + 0\mathbf{k} \big) - \big( a\hat{ \mathbf{a}}_{r} \big) \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= -a\hat{ \mathbf{a}}_{r} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;}| &amp;amp;= \sqrt{(-a)^{2}} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= a \\&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Plugging these into the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; integral gives:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{E} &amp;amp;= \int \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{\frac{Q}{2 \pi} d\theta}{a^2} \frac{-a \hat{ \mathbf{a}}_{r}}{a} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= - \int \frac{1}{8 {\pi}^{2} \epsilon_{0}} \frac{Q}{a^2} \hat{ \mathbf{a}}_{r} d\theta \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= - \frac{Q}{a^{2} 8 {\pi}^{2} \epsilon_{0}} \int \hat{ \mathbf{a}}_{r} d\theta \\&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\theta&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the angle from the x-axis. &lt;br /&gt;
::*To integrate over the entire ring, we set the bounds of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\theta&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;[0, 2 \pi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
::*Also, as of right now, the integral would not evaluate to 0. This is because &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat{ \mathbf{a}}_{r}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; has a hidden dependence on &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\theta&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat{ \mathbf{a}}_{r} = \text{cos}( \theta) \mathbf{i} + \text{sin}( \theta) \mathbf{j}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Plugging this information in gives:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{alignat}{3}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{E} &amp;amp;= - \frac{Q}{a^{2} 8 {\pi}^{2} \epsilon_{0}} \int_{0}^{2 \pi} \big( \text{cos}( \theta) \mathbf{i} + \text{sin}( \theta) \mathbf{j} \big) d\theta \\&lt;br /&gt;
\int_{0}^{2 \pi} \text{cos}( \theta) \mathbf{i} \ d\theta &amp;amp;= 0 \\&lt;br /&gt;
\int_{0}^{2 \pi} \text{sin}( \theta) \mathbf{j} \ d\theta &amp;amp;= 0 \\&lt;br /&gt;
\end{alignat}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} = 0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at the origin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
The real world applications of electric fields are endless. Here are some:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:electricmotor.jpg|400px|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Motors:&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Electric motors convert Electrical Energy into Mechanical Energy through &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Fields&#039;&#039;&#039;. Whenever electric motors are turned on, &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Fields&#039;&#039;&#039; are generated. This is because in order to turn an electric motor, an &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; must first be generated, which then generates a Magnetic Field, thus making the motor spin. Electric motors are used in cars, elevators, fans, refrigerators, and many more applications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Computers:&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Computers use circuits, electric fans, and transistors to work. All of these use &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Fields&#039;&#039;&#039; to push charge through a circuit, spin fans, and allow logic to be implemented in electronics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Painting:&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Fields&#039;&#039;&#039; are also used in some paintings. The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; generates charges on the surface of the material being painted on, and an opposite charge is generated on the paint. Paint that touches the material sticks, and excess paint falls off to go back into the system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Cancer Treatment:&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Recently, weak &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Fields&#039;&#039;&#039; have been used to kill cancer cells. This treatment works best for brain and breast cancers, and it has no effect on normal cells. In lab and animal tests, this treatment killed cancer cells of every type tested; however, this is still a developing treatment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Fields&#039;&#039;&#039; are created by Electric charges. The original discovery of the Electric charge is not explicitly known, but in 1675 the esteemed chemist Robert Boyle, known for Boyle&#039;s Law, discovered the attraction and repulsion of certain particles in a vacuum. Almost 100 years later in the 18th century, the American Benjamin Franklin first coined the phrases &#039;positive&#039; and &#039;negative&#039; (later developed into proton and electron) for these particles with attractive and repulsive properties. Finally, in the 19th century Michael Faraday utilized his Electrolysis process to discover the discrete nature of Electric charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
The ability to understand &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Fields&#039;&#039;&#039; helps set the basis for the introduction to [[Electric Force]] (as we discussed &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \mathbf{F}  = q\mathbf{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; ). The introduction of Electric Force will attach the specific charge of the particles with the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; that they produce, resulting in the Electric Force. Electric Force will lay the ground work for understanding the force that particles have in different systems and environments, and eventually lead to the introduction of [[Magnetic Force]].&lt;br /&gt;
The understanding of &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Fields&#039;&#039;&#039; is a doorway into many various fields, only some of which will be covered in Physics 2212. The fundamental understanding of &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Fields&#039;&#039;&#039; will prove to be very important further along when Magnetic Fields are introduced, as they share many qualities. The understanding of Electric and Magnetic Fields will be used throughout the semester to learn about various Electromagnetic concepts, and ultimately to understanding and apply Maxwell&#039;s Equations. &lt;br /&gt;
Please see related topics:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Electric Potential]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Electric Force]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Lorentz Force]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Electric Polarization]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Charged Ring]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EPIhhbwbCNc&amp;amp;list=PLX2gX-ftPVXUcMGbk1A7UbNtgadPsK5BD&amp;amp;index=9 A Youtube Playlist That Does A Great Job Going Step By Step And Reviewing Topics]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/estatics/Lesson-4/Electric-Field-Lines Further Review On Electric Field Lines.] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://phet.colorado.edu/en/simulation/charges-and-fields Get A Better Understanding Of Fields Through Hands On Manipulation In PhET. This Can Be Very Helpful For Getting An Intuitive Understanding Of Fields.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_field Wikipedia Electric Field]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://openstax.org/details/books/university-physics-volume-2 OpenStax Volume on Electricity and Magnetism]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Hayt &amp;amp; Buck 9th Edition Engineering Electromagnetics&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Matter and Interactions&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurence12799</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=38631</id>
		<title>Electric Potential</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=38631"/>
		<updated>2020-03-24T21:16:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurence12799: /* A Mathematical Model */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039;, like all forms of potential energy, is the potential for work to be done, in this case by the electric force. The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; (frequently referred to as voltage, from its SI unit, the Volt) is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; associated with the test charge (1 Coulomb), such that it depends only on the source, just as the electric field is related to the electric force, but depends only on the source. One may similarly remember the parallel concept of the gravitational potential, which was gravitational potential energy divided by mass.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined with respect to the [[Electric Force]] &amp;amp; [[Electric Field]]:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} = - q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; from point b to point a&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the charge in the electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the source charge&#039;s electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a differential length along the path from point b to point a&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1150px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Derivation of Electric Potential Energy&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The differential work &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(dW)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; associated with an external force &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{F}_{ext})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moving a charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; from point b to point a &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(d\mathbf{L})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; through an electric field &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{E})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;dW = \mathbf{F}_{ext} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is the vector multiplication of the force moving the charge and the distance the object has moved.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The external force must be equal and opposite to the force associated with the source charge&#039;s electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{F}_{ext} &amp;amp;= - \mathbf{F}_{E} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= - q \mathbf{E}&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;dW = - q \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Integrating from point b to point a along the path gives:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W = -q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, since the work was defined externally, the calculated work is equal to the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} =  -q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricPotentialPaths.png|400px|right|thumb|Some sets of electrically equivalent paths for a charge.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From this, the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; per test charge in the source charge&#039;s electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{U_{ab}}{q} = - \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The electric field is a &#039;&#039;conservative vector field&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:::This means that any path used in the above line integral will give the same value for the same beginning and end points (b and a). Looking at the figure to the right, many paths for a charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; subject to the electric field of source charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are shown. In each set of four paths (Green, Blue, Yellow, and Pink), the same amount of &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is gained or lost. &lt;br /&gt;
*A special case shown in dark green near the bottom right of the figure also exists:&lt;br /&gt;
:::If a charge is moving along a path that is always perpendicular to the electric field, the line integral will evaluate to zero, and therefore the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; will also evaluate to zero.&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is easily shown with the dot product; if two variable vectors are always perpendicular, then their dot product is always zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricPotentialRadial.png|400px|right|thumb|Illustration of radial potential.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; between two point charges &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(Q \ \text{and} \ q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be written in a simpler expression:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr ( \frac{1}{r_{a}} - \frac{1}{r_{b}} \biggr )&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the charge in the source&#039;s electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{a}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the final position &lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{b}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the initial position&lt;br /&gt;
:*The initial position is often taken to be infinity (the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined to be zero at infinity) creating a simpler and more familiar looking equation:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} r}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
:::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the distance between the source charge and the charge in the electric field&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is used to described the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; gained or lost when moving a charge radially closer to a source charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:700px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Derivation of Radial Potential&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
===Externals links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Main Idea ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electric potential energy, like all forms of potential energy, is the potential for work to be done, in this case by the electric force. The electric potential (frequently referred to as voltage, from its SI unit the Volt) is the electric potential energy associated with the test charge, such that it depends only on the source, just as the electric field is related to the electric force, but depends only on the source. One may similarly remember the parallel concept of the gravitational potential, which was gravitational potential energy divided by mass.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
====Electric Potential Energy====&lt;br /&gt;
Electric potential energy may be calculated in a variety of manners, depending upon the situation. The electric potential energy between two point charges may be written in a form which follows directly from the definition of the Coulomb force:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = \frac{qQ}{4\pi\epsilon_0 r_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is the amount of energy which would be required to bring one of the charged objects (by convention the small &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; q &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; charge) from an infinite distance to its current position, where, by convention, the potential energy at infinity is equal to zero. This may, therefore, be derived from the equation for work:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Derivation with Calculus=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -W = -\int_\infty^{r_0} \vec{F}_E(r) \cdot \text{d} \vec{r} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -\int_\infty^{r_0} \frac{qQ \hat{r}}{4\pi\epsilon_0 r^2} \cdot \text{d} \vec{r} = -\frac{qQ}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\int_\infty^{r_0} \frac{\hat{r} \cdot \hat{r}}{r^2} \text{d} r &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = \frac{qQ}{4\pi \epsilon_0} \biggr{(} \frac{1}{r} \biggr{|}_{\infty}^{r_0} = \frac{qQ}{4\pi \epsilon_0 r_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Given our definition of the [[Electric Field]], we have that &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vec{F}_E(r) = q\vec{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
so the electric potential energy may be generally written as &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -q\int_a^b \vec{E} \cdot \text{d} \vec{r} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Linear assumption=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the above equation, one can see that if the electric field is constant over the length of the path, then electric potential energy may be written in a simplified manner as&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = q\vec{E}\cdot\Delta \vec{s} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Electric Potential====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just as we divided by charge to go from electric force to electric field, dividing by charge takes us from the electric potential energy to the electric potential. For a test particle of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; q &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we define &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; V = \frac{U}{q} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Derivation with Calculus=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is not especially meaningful without choosing a reference point, just as for potential energy. Thus, one may speak of the potential difference between two points, which is independent of the reference value. From the above definition of electric potential energy, it is possible to derive an expression for the potential difference between two points from the electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\int_a^b \vec{E} \cdot \text{d} \vec{s} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The vectors are used to express the path associated with this integral. The difference in electric potential will be the same no matter what path one takes, as explored in [[Path Independence of Electric Potential]]. This also allows one to write the inverse relationship, determining the electric field at a given point from the electric potential in one and three dimensions respectively:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; E = -\frac{\text{d}V}{\text{d}x}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vec{E} = -\nabla V &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \nabla &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the gradient operator.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Linear Assumption=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The above equations allow us to write the equivalent expressions under an assumption of constant values for the electric field, such that the integral reduces to &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\vec{E} \cdot \Delta \vec{l} = -(E_x \Delta x + E_y \Delta y + E_z \Delta z)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This also leads directly to the inverse expression:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vec{E} = -(\frac{\Delta V_x}{\Delta x} + \frac{\Delta V_y}{\Delta y} + \frac{\Delta V_z}{\Delta z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric potential difference in a field which is nonuniform, but whose variations are discrete, is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\sum \vec{E}\cdot \Delta\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The different parts in this particular equation resembles the equation for the potential difference in an uniform field, except that with the nonuniform field, the potential difference in the different fields are summed up. This situation can be quite easy, but when the system gets difficult, first, choose a path and divide it into smaller pieces of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;; second, write an expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -\vec{E}\cdot\Delta\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of one piece; third, add up the contributions of all the pieces; last, check the result to make sure the magnitude, direction, and units make sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is important to keep track of the sign differences. If the path follows the direction of the electric field, the sign of the potential difference will be negative. This may be imagined as dropping a positive test charge in an electric field: a positive charge will be accelerated in the direction of the field, meaning that it is gaining energy, and so its potential must be decreasing. By contrast, if the path is opposite the direction of the field, potential will be increasing, much like rolling a boulder up a hill. If the path is perpendicular to the direction of the electric field, the dot product will be equal to zero. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, when working with different situations, it is nice to keep in mind that in a conductor, the electric field is zero. Therefore, the potential difference is zero as well. In an insulator, the electric field is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{E_{applied}}{K}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the dielectric constant. Furthermore, the potential difference over a round trip is equal to zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
Click on the link to see Electric Potential through VPython!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Make sure to press &amp;quot;Run&amp;quot; to see the principle in action!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://trinket.io/embed/glowscript/0a7e486c94 Teach hand-on with GlowScript]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Watch this video for a more visual approach! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Rb9guSEeVE Electric Potential: Visualizing Voltage with 3D animations]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--== Models ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric potential of a particle at a point is equal to the potential difference of that particle with respect to infinity. Since we know how to calculate the potential difference using the formula, we can see that this implies that the electric potential at infinity is equal to zero. What does this mean? This means that a particle that is extremely far away has no potential energy. This makes sense, because a proton will not be affected by the electric field of another proton at a distance of infinity apart. This subtle detail aids in solving a case of problems types later on.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although electric potential is an important topic to learn, most problems encountered will not ask to find just the &amp;quot;electric potential,&amp;quot; instead, questions will most likely ask for the &amp;quot;electric potential difference.&amp;quot; This is because electric potential is measured using different locations, or more specifically pathways between the different locations, so instead of determining the electric potential of location A and the electric potential of final location B, it would make more sense to determine the &amp;quot;difference in electric potential between locations A and B.&amp;quot; The following mathematical model will further explain this. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like mentioned before, instead of electric potential, in most cases, electric potential difference is needed to be found. The general equation for the potential difference is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{{U}_{electric}} = {q} * ∆{V} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{{U}_{electric}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric potential energy, which is measured in Joules (J). &#039;&#039;&#039;q&#039;&#039;&#039; is the charge of the particle moving through the path of the electric potential difference, which is measured in coulombs (C). &#039;&#039;&#039;∆V&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric potential difference, which is measured in Joules per Coulomb (J/C), or just Volts (V).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Aside from the general equation, the electric potential difference can also be found in other ways. The potential difference in an &#039;&#039;&#039;uniform field&#039;&#039;&#039; is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{V} = -({E}_{x}∆{x} + {E}_{y}∆{y} + {E}_{z}∆{z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;, which can also be written as &#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{V} = -\vec{E}·∆\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the electric potential difference, which is measured in Joules per Coulomb (J/C), or just Volts (V). &#039;&#039;&#039;E&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric field, which is measured in Newtons per Coulomb (N/C), and it is important to note that the different direction components of the electric field are used in the equation. &#039;&#039;&#039;l&#039;&#039;&#039; (or the &#039;&#039;&#039;x&#039;&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;&#039;y&#039;&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;&#039;z&#039;&#039;&#039;) is the distance between the two described locations, which is measured in meters, and x, y, and z, are the different components of the difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, when working with different situations, it is nice to keep in mind that in a conductor, the electric field is zero. Therefore, the potential difference is zero as well. In an insulator, the electric field is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;{E}_{applied} / K&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; where &#039;&#039;&#039;K&#039;&#039;&#039; is the dielectric constant. Also, the round trip potential difference is always zero, or in other words, if you start from a certain point and end at the same point, then, the potential difference will be zero. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
In a capacitor, the negative charges are located on the left plate, and the positive charges are located on the right plate. Location A is at the left end of the capacitor, and Location B is at the right end of the capacitor, or in other words, Location A and B are only different in terms of their x component location. The path moves from A to B. What is the direction of the electric field? Is the potential difference positive or negative? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ep125.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer: The electric field is to the left. The potential difference is increasing, or is positive.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
The electric field always moves away from the positive charge and towards the negative charge, which means the electric field in this example is to the left. Because the direction and the electric field and the direction of the path are opposite, the potential difference is increasing, or is positive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Calculate the change in electric potential between point A, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(-4, 3,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and B, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(2,-2,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; . The electric field in the location is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; (50,0,0) \; N/C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:EP mid fig.png ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer: -300V&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta\vec{l}= (2,-2,0)\;m - (-4,3,0)\;m = (6,-5,0)\;m &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -({E}_{x}∆{x} + {E}_{y}∆{y} + {E}_{z}∆{z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -(50\; N/C \cdot 6 \;m + 0 \; N/c \cdot -5 \; m + 0\cdot 0)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -300 V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Bohr Model]] of the hydrogen atom treats it as a nucleus of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; +e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; electrons of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; orbiting in circular orbits of specific radii. Calculate the potential difference between two points, one infinitely far away from the nucleus, and the other one Bohr radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; away from the nucleus (don&#039;t worry about substituting in the values). Compute the electric potential energy associated with the electron one Bohr radius away from the nucleus, setting the potential energy at infinity as zero (remember the sign of the charge). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We may compute the electric potential by taking integrating the electric field of a point charge as the radius goes from infinity to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. This integral may be set up as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\int_\infty^{a_0} \vec{E}\cdot\text{d}\vec{l} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \int_\infty^{a_0} \frac{\text{d} r}{r^2} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This may then be solved:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\biggr{(}\frac{1}{r}\biggr{|}_\infty^{a_0} = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
to compute the potential energy, we now multiply by the charge of the electron: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, giving &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -\frac{e^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Depending on what physics or chemistry courses you may have taken before, this may be recognizable as twice the ionization energy of the n=1 orbital. The factor of two is due to the fact that in the Bohr model, the kinetic energy will be exactly half of this potential energy, and will be positive so that the net result is still negative, but with half the magnitude. This understanding of the hydrogen atom gets certain values right, but the reality of the situation is far more complicated. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is this topic connected to something that you are interested in?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am interested in robotic systems and building circuit boards and electrical systems for manufacturing robots. While studying this section in the book, I was able to connect back many of the concepts and calculations back to robotics and the electrical component of automated systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Since high school, I never really understood how to work with the voltmeter and what it measured, and I have always wanted to know, but although this particular wiki page did not go into the details and other branches of electric potential, it led me to find the answers to something I was interested in since high school, the concept of electric potential.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I think electively is really interesting. When I was younger, I participated in this demo where a group of people hold hands and someone touches this special ball full of charge. We all could feel the tingling sensation of the current passing through us. It’s cool to learn the theory behind the supposed magic that occurs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I think it&#039;s very interesting that electric potential can be seen as a property of a space and that we can have further applications using this property.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is it connected to your major?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am a Mechanical Engineering major, so I will be dealing with the electrical components of machines when I work. Therefore, I have to know these certain concepts such as electric potential in order to fully understand how they work and interact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revistionist] As a biochemistry major, electric potential and electric potential difference is not particularly related to my major, but in chemistry classes, we use electrostatic potential maps (electrostatic potential energy maps) that shows the charge distributions throughout a molecule. Although the main use in electric potential is different in physics and biochemistry (where physicists use it identify the effect of the electric field at a location), I still found it interesting as the concept of electric potential (buildup) was being used in quite a different way. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I am a computer science major. Although I deal mostly with software, the hardware aspect is still important. The algorithms that I design run differently on different machines. The time complexity of an algorithm is sometimes useless when worrying about constant factors that are determined by a system’s hardware. Quicksort, for instance, is usually faster than many other sorts that have lower time complexities. The hardware of computers heavily relies on electricity and current (which is induced by a potential difference) to switch transistors on and off and thereby process information. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I am an aerospace engineering major, and I think understanding such concepts will help me have a better holistic understanding towards fields and systems. In addition, the thinking behind solving related problems will help me better prepared for future classes that involve with solving dynamics problems. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Is there an interesting industrial application?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] Electrical potential is used to find the voltage across a path. This is useful when working with circuit components and attempting to manipulate the power output or current throughout a component.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Electric potential sensors are being used to detect a variety of electrical signals made by the human body, thus contributing to the field of electrophysiology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] The study of electric potential has lead scientists to generate very safe wires that will not overheat and cause fires. Connecting circuits to ground is important and the third prong in an electrical outlet is this ground connection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The idea of electric potential, in a way, started with Ben Franklin and his experiments in the 1740s. He began to understand the flow of electricity, which eventually paved the path towards explaining electric potential and potential difference. Scientists finally began to understand how electric fields were actually affecting the charges and the surrounding environment. Benjamin Franklin first shocked himself in 1746, while conducting experiments on electricity with found objects from around his house. Six years later, or 261 years ago for us, the founding father flew a kite attached to a key and a silk ribbon in a thunderstorm and effectively trapped lightning in a jar. The experiment is now seen as a watershed moment in mankind&#039;s venture to channel a force of nature that was viewed quite abstractly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the time Franklin started experimenting with electricity, he&#039;d already found fame and fortune as the author of Poor Richard&#039;s Almanack. Electricity wasn&#039;t a very well understood phenomenon at that point, so Franklin&#039;s research proved to be fairly foundational. The early experiments, experts believe, were inspired by other scientists&#039; work and the shortcomings therein.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ep135.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
source: http://www.benjamin-franklin-history.org/kite-experiment/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That early brush with the dangers of electricity left an impression on Franklin. He described the sensation as &amp;quot;a universal blow throughout my whole body from head to foot, which seemed within as well as without; after which the first thing I took notice of was a violent quick shaking of my body.&amp;quot; However, it didn&#039;t scare him away. In the handful of years before his famous kite experiment, Franklin contributed everything from designing the first battery designs to establishing some common nomenclature in the study of electricity. Although Franklin is often coined the father of electricity, after he set the foundations of electricity, many other scientists contributed his or her research in the advancement of electricity and eventually led to the discovery of electric potential and potential difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like mentioned multiple times throughout the page, although electric potential is a huge and important topic, it has many branches, which makes the concept of electric potential difficult to stand alone. Even with this page, to support the concept of electric potential, many crucial branches of the topic appeared, like potential difference (which also branched into [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_Path_Independence,_claimed_by_Aditya_Mohile Potential Difference Path Independence]], [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_in_a_Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Uniform Field]], and [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_of_Point_Charge_in_a_Non-Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Nonuniform Field]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External Links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] https://www.khanacademy.org/test-prep/mcat/physical-processes/electrostatics-1/v/electric-potential-at-a-point-in-space&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pcWz4tP_zUw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vpa_uApmNoo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] https://www.khanacademy.org/science/electrical-engineering/ee-electrostatics/ee-fields-potential-voltage/a/ee-electric-potential-voltage&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] &amp;quot;Benjamin Franklin and Electricity.&amp;quot; Benjamin Franklin and Electricity. N.p., n.d. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.americaslibrary.gov/aa/franklinb/aa_franklinb_electric_1.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Bottyan, Thomas. &amp;quot;Electrostatic Potential Maps.&amp;quot; Chemwiki. N.p., 02 Oct. 2013. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://chemwiki.ucdavis.edu/Core/Theoretical_Chemistry/Chemical_Bonding/General_Principles_of_Chemical_Bonding/Electrostatic_Potential_maps&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] &amp;quot;Electric Potential Difference.&amp;quot; Electric Potential Difference. The Physics Classroom, n.d. Web. 14 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/circuits/Lesson-1/Electric-Potential-Difference&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] Harland, C. J., T. D. Clark, and R. J. Prance. &amp;quot;Applications of Electric Potential (Displacement Current) Sensors in Human Body Electrophysiology.&amp;quot; International Society for Industrial Process Tomography, n.d. Web. 16 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.isipt.org/world-congress/3/269.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] Sherwood, Bruce A. &amp;quot;2.1 The Momentum Principle.&amp;quot; Matter &amp;amp; Interactions. By Ruth W. Chabay. 4th ed. Vol. 1. N.p.: John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons, 2015. 45-50. Print. Modern Mechanics.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurence12799</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=38630</id>
		<title>Electric Potential</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=38630"/>
		<updated>2020-03-24T21:15:47Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurence12799: /* A Mathematical Model */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039;, like all forms of potential energy, is the potential for work to be done, in this case by the electric force. The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; (frequently referred to as voltage, from its SI unit, the Volt) is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; associated with the test charge (1 Coulomb), such that it depends only on the source, just as the electric field is related to the electric force, but depends only on the source. One may similarly remember the parallel concept of the gravitational potential, which was gravitational potential energy divided by mass.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined with respect to the [[Electric Force]] &amp;amp; [[Electric Field]]:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} = - q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; from point b to point a&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the charge in the electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the source charge&#039;s electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a differential length along the path from point b to point a&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1150px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Derivation of Electric Potential Energy&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The differential work &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(dW)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; associated with an external force &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{F}_{ext})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moving a charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; from point b to point a &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(d\mathbf{L})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; through an electric field &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathbf{E})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;dW = \mathbf{F}_{ext} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::*This is the vector multiplication of the force moving the charge and the distance the object has moved.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The external force must be equal and opposite to the force associated with the source charge&#039;s electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{F}_{ext} &amp;amp;= - \mathbf{F}_{E} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= - q \mathbf{E}&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;dW = - q \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Integrating from point b to point a along the path gives:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W = -q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, since the work was defined externally, the calculated work is equal to the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} =  -q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricPotentialPaths.png|400px|right|thumb|Some sets of electrically equivalent paths for a charge.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From this, the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; per test charge in the source charge&#039;s electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{U_{ab}}{q} = - \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The electric field is a &#039;&#039;conservative vector field&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:::This means that any path used in the above line integral will give the same value for the same beginning and end points (b and a). Looking at the figure to the right, many paths for a charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; subject to the electric field of source charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are shown. In each set of four paths (Green, Blue, Yellow, and Pink), the same amount of &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is gained or lost. &lt;br /&gt;
*A special case shown in dark green near the bottom right of the figure also exists:&lt;br /&gt;
:::If a charge is moving along a path that is always perpendicular to the electric field, the line integral will evaluate to zero, and therefore the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; will also evaluate to zero.&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is easily shown with the dot product; if two variable vectors are always perpendicular, then their dot product is always zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricPotentialRadial.png|400px|right|thumb|Illustration of radial potential.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; between two point charges &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(Q \ \text{and} \ q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be written in a simpler expression:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr ( \frac{1}{r_{a}} - \frac{1}{r_{b}} \biggr )&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the charge in the source&#039;s electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{a}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the final position &lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{b}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the initial position&lt;br /&gt;
:*The initial position is often taken to be infinity (the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined to be zero at infinity) creating a simpler and more familiar looking equation:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} r}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
:::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the distance between the source charge and the charge in the electric field&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is used to described the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; gained or lost when moving a charge radially closer to a source charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:700px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Derivation of Radial Potential&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
===Externals links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Main Idea ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electric potential energy, like all forms of potential energy, is the potential for work to be done, in this case by the electric force. The electric potential (frequently referred to as voltage, from its SI unit the Volt) is the electric potential energy associated with the test charge, such that it depends only on the source, just as the electric field is related to the electric force, but depends only on the source. One may similarly remember the parallel concept of the gravitational potential, which was gravitational potential energy divided by mass.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
====Electric Potential Energy====&lt;br /&gt;
Electric potential energy may be calculated in a variety of manners, depending upon the situation. The electric potential energy between two point charges may be written in a form which follows directly from the definition of the Coulomb force:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = \frac{qQ}{4\pi\epsilon_0 r_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is the amount of energy which would be required to bring one of the charged objects (by convention the small &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; q &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; charge) from an infinite distance to its current position, where, by convention, the potential energy at infinity is equal to zero. This may, therefore, be derived from the equation for work:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Derivation with Calculus=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -W = -\int_\infty^{r_0} \vec{F}_E(r) \cdot \text{d} \vec{r} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -\int_\infty^{r_0} \frac{qQ \hat{r}}{4\pi\epsilon_0 r^2} \cdot \text{d} \vec{r} = -\frac{qQ}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\int_\infty^{r_0} \frac{\hat{r} \cdot \hat{r}}{r^2} \text{d} r &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = \frac{qQ}{4\pi \epsilon_0} \biggr{(} \frac{1}{r} \biggr{|}_{\infty}^{r_0} = \frac{qQ}{4\pi \epsilon_0 r_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Given our definition of the [[Electric Field]], we have that &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vec{F}_E(r) = q\vec{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
so the electric potential energy may be generally written as &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -q\int_a^b \vec{E} \cdot \text{d} \vec{r} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Linear assumption=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the above equation, one can see that if the electric field is constant over the length of the path, then electric potential energy may be written in a simplified manner as&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = q\vec{E}\cdot\Delta \vec{s} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Electric Potential====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just as we divided by charge to go from electric force to electric field, dividing by charge takes us from the electric potential energy to the electric potential. For a test particle of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; q &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we define &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; V = \frac{U}{q} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Derivation with Calculus=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is not especially meaningful without choosing a reference point, just as for potential energy. Thus, one may speak of the potential difference between two points, which is independent of the reference value. From the above definition of electric potential energy, it is possible to derive an expression for the potential difference between two points from the electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\int_a^b \vec{E} \cdot \text{d} \vec{s} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The vectors are used to express the path associated with this integral. The difference in electric potential will be the same no matter what path one takes, as explored in [[Path Independence of Electric Potential]]. This also allows one to write the inverse relationship, determining the electric field at a given point from the electric potential in one and three dimensions respectively:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; E = -\frac{\text{d}V}{\text{d}x}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vec{E} = -\nabla V &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \nabla &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the gradient operator.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Linear Assumption=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The above equations allow us to write the equivalent expressions under an assumption of constant values for the electric field, such that the integral reduces to &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\vec{E} \cdot \Delta \vec{l} = -(E_x \Delta x + E_y \Delta y + E_z \Delta z)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This also leads directly to the inverse expression:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vec{E} = -(\frac{\Delta V_x}{\Delta x} + \frac{\Delta V_y}{\Delta y} + \frac{\Delta V_z}{\Delta z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric potential difference in a field which is nonuniform, but whose variations are discrete, is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\sum \vec{E}\cdot \Delta\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The different parts in this particular equation resembles the equation for the potential difference in an uniform field, except that with the nonuniform field, the potential difference in the different fields are summed up. This situation can be quite easy, but when the system gets difficult, first, choose a path and divide it into smaller pieces of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;; second, write an expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -\vec{E}\cdot\Delta\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of one piece; third, add up the contributions of all the pieces; last, check the result to make sure the magnitude, direction, and units make sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is important to keep track of the sign differences. If the path follows the direction of the electric field, the sign of the potential difference will be negative. This may be imagined as dropping a positive test charge in an electric field: a positive charge will be accelerated in the direction of the field, meaning that it is gaining energy, and so its potential must be decreasing. By contrast, if the path is opposite the direction of the field, potential will be increasing, much like rolling a boulder up a hill. If the path is perpendicular to the direction of the electric field, the dot product will be equal to zero. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, when working with different situations, it is nice to keep in mind that in a conductor, the electric field is zero. Therefore, the potential difference is zero as well. In an insulator, the electric field is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{E_{applied}}{K}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the dielectric constant. Furthermore, the potential difference over a round trip is equal to zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
Click on the link to see Electric Potential through VPython!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Make sure to press &amp;quot;Run&amp;quot; to see the principle in action!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://trinket.io/embed/glowscript/0a7e486c94 Teach hand-on with GlowScript]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Watch this video for a more visual approach! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Rb9guSEeVE Electric Potential: Visualizing Voltage with 3D animations]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--== Models ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric potential of a particle at a point is equal to the potential difference of that particle with respect to infinity. Since we know how to calculate the potential difference using the formula, we can see that this implies that the electric potential at infinity is equal to zero. What does this mean? This means that a particle that is extremely far away has no potential energy. This makes sense, because a proton will not be affected by the electric field of another proton at a distance of infinity apart. This subtle detail aids in solving a case of problems types later on.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although electric potential is an important topic to learn, most problems encountered will not ask to find just the &amp;quot;electric potential,&amp;quot; instead, questions will most likely ask for the &amp;quot;electric potential difference.&amp;quot; This is because electric potential is measured using different locations, or more specifically pathways between the different locations, so instead of determining the electric potential of location A and the electric potential of final location B, it would make more sense to determine the &amp;quot;difference in electric potential between locations A and B.&amp;quot; The following mathematical model will further explain this. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like mentioned before, instead of electric potential, in most cases, electric potential difference is needed to be found. The general equation for the potential difference is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{{U}_{electric}} = {q} * ∆{V} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{{U}_{electric}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric potential energy, which is measured in Joules (J). &#039;&#039;&#039;q&#039;&#039;&#039; is the charge of the particle moving through the path of the electric potential difference, which is measured in coulombs (C). &#039;&#039;&#039;∆V&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric potential difference, which is measured in Joules per Coulomb (J/C), or just Volts (V).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Aside from the general equation, the electric potential difference can also be found in other ways. The potential difference in an &#039;&#039;&#039;uniform field&#039;&#039;&#039; is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{V} = -({E}_{x}∆{x} + {E}_{y}∆{y} + {E}_{z}∆{z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;, which can also be written as &#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{V} = -\vec{E}·∆\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the electric potential difference, which is measured in Joules per Coulomb (J/C), or just Volts (V). &#039;&#039;&#039;E&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric field, which is measured in Newtons per Coulomb (N/C), and it is important to note that the different direction components of the electric field are used in the equation. &#039;&#039;&#039;l&#039;&#039;&#039; (or the &#039;&#039;&#039;x&#039;&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;&#039;y&#039;&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;&#039;z&#039;&#039;&#039;) is the distance between the two described locations, which is measured in meters, and x, y, and z, are the different components of the difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, when working with different situations, it is nice to keep in mind that in a conductor, the electric field is zero. Therefore, the potential difference is zero as well. In an insulator, the electric field is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;{E}_{applied} / K&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; where &#039;&#039;&#039;K&#039;&#039;&#039; is the dielectric constant. Also, the round trip potential difference is always zero, or in other words, if you start from a certain point and end at the same point, then, the potential difference will be zero. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
In a capacitor, the negative charges are located on the left plate, and the positive charges are located on the right plate. Location A is at the left end of the capacitor, and Location B is at the right end of the capacitor, or in other words, Location A and B are only different in terms of their x component location. The path moves from A to B. What is the direction of the electric field? Is the potential difference positive or negative? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ep125.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer: The electric field is to the left. The potential difference is increasing, or is positive.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
The electric field always moves away from the positive charge and towards the negative charge, which means the electric field in this example is to the left. Because the direction and the electric field and the direction of the path are opposite, the potential difference is increasing, or is positive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Calculate the change in electric potential between point A, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(-4, 3,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and B, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(2,-2,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; . The electric field in the location is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; (50,0,0) \; N/C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:EP mid fig.png ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer: -300V&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta\vec{l}= (2,-2,0)\;m - (-4,3,0)\;m = (6,-5,0)\;m &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -({E}_{x}∆{x} + {E}_{y}∆{y} + {E}_{z}∆{z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -(50\; N/C \cdot 6 \;m + 0 \; N/c \cdot -5 \; m + 0\cdot 0)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -300 V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Bohr Model]] of the hydrogen atom treats it as a nucleus of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; +e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; electrons of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; orbiting in circular orbits of specific radii. Calculate the potential difference between two points, one infinitely far away from the nucleus, and the other one Bohr radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; away from the nucleus (don&#039;t worry about substituting in the values). Compute the electric potential energy associated with the electron one Bohr radius away from the nucleus, setting the potential energy at infinity as zero (remember the sign of the charge). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We may compute the electric potential by taking integrating the electric field of a point charge as the radius goes from infinity to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. This integral may be set up as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\int_\infty^{a_0} \vec{E}\cdot\text{d}\vec{l} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \int_\infty^{a_0} \frac{\text{d} r}{r^2} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This may then be solved:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\biggr{(}\frac{1}{r}\biggr{|}_\infty^{a_0} = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
to compute the potential energy, we now multiply by the charge of the electron: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, giving &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -\frac{e^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Depending on what physics or chemistry courses you may have taken before, this may be recognizable as twice the ionization energy of the n=1 orbital. The factor of two is due to the fact that in the Bohr model, the kinetic energy will be exactly half of this potential energy, and will be positive so that the net result is still negative, but with half the magnitude. This understanding of the hydrogen atom gets certain values right, but the reality of the situation is far more complicated. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is this topic connected to something that you are interested in?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am interested in robotic systems and building circuit boards and electrical systems for manufacturing robots. While studying this section in the book, I was able to connect back many of the concepts and calculations back to robotics and the electrical component of automated systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Since high school, I never really understood how to work with the voltmeter and what it measured, and I have always wanted to know, but although this particular wiki page did not go into the details and other branches of electric potential, it led me to find the answers to something I was interested in since high school, the concept of electric potential.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I think electively is really interesting. When I was younger, I participated in this demo where a group of people hold hands and someone touches this special ball full of charge. We all could feel the tingling sensation of the current passing through us. It’s cool to learn the theory behind the supposed magic that occurs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I think it&#039;s very interesting that electric potential can be seen as a property of a space and that we can have further applications using this property.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is it connected to your major?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am a Mechanical Engineering major, so I will be dealing with the electrical components of machines when I work. Therefore, I have to know these certain concepts such as electric potential in order to fully understand how they work and interact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revistionist] As a biochemistry major, electric potential and electric potential difference is not particularly related to my major, but in chemistry classes, we use electrostatic potential maps (electrostatic potential energy maps) that shows the charge distributions throughout a molecule. Although the main use in electric potential is different in physics and biochemistry (where physicists use it identify the effect of the electric field at a location), I still found it interesting as the concept of electric potential (buildup) was being used in quite a different way. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I am a computer science major. Although I deal mostly with software, the hardware aspect is still important. The algorithms that I design run differently on different machines. The time complexity of an algorithm is sometimes useless when worrying about constant factors that are determined by a system’s hardware. Quicksort, for instance, is usually faster than many other sorts that have lower time complexities. The hardware of computers heavily relies on electricity and current (which is induced by a potential difference) to switch transistors on and off and thereby process information. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I am an aerospace engineering major, and I think understanding such concepts will help me have a better holistic understanding towards fields and systems. In addition, the thinking behind solving related problems will help me better prepared for future classes that involve with solving dynamics problems. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Is there an interesting industrial application?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] Electrical potential is used to find the voltage across a path. This is useful when working with circuit components and attempting to manipulate the power output or current throughout a component.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Electric potential sensors are being used to detect a variety of electrical signals made by the human body, thus contributing to the field of electrophysiology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] The study of electric potential has lead scientists to generate very safe wires that will not overheat and cause fires. Connecting circuits to ground is important and the third prong in an electrical outlet is this ground connection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The idea of electric potential, in a way, started with Ben Franklin and his experiments in the 1740s. He began to understand the flow of electricity, which eventually paved the path towards explaining electric potential and potential difference. Scientists finally began to understand how electric fields were actually affecting the charges and the surrounding environment. Benjamin Franklin first shocked himself in 1746, while conducting experiments on electricity with found objects from around his house. Six years later, or 261 years ago for us, the founding father flew a kite attached to a key and a silk ribbon in a thunderstorm and effectively trapped lightning in a jar. The experiment is now seen as a watershed moment in mankind&#039;s venture to channel a force of nature that was viewed quite abstractly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the time Franklin started experimenting with electricity, he&#039;d already found fame and fortune as the author of Poor Richard&#039;s Almanack. Electricity wasn&#039;t a very well understood phenomenon at that point, so Franklin&#039;s research proved to be fairly foundational. The early experiments, experts believe, were inspired by other scientists&#039; work and the shortcomings therein.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ep135.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
source: http://www.benjamin-franklin-history.org/kite-experiment/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That early brush with the dangers of electricity left an impression on Franklin. He described the sensation as &amp;quot;a universal blow throughout my whole body from head to foot, which seemed within as well as without; after which the first thing I took notice of was a violent quick shaking of my body.&amp;quot; However, it didn&#039;t scare him away. In the handful of years before his famous kite experiment, Franklin contributed everything from designing the first battery designs to establishing some common nomenclature in the study of electricity. Although Franklin is often coined the father of electricity, after he set the foundations of electricity, many other scientists contributed his or her research in the advancement of electricity and eventually led to the discovery of electric potential and potential difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like mentioned multiple times throughout the page, although electric potential is a huge and important topic, it has many branches, which makes the concept of electric potential difficult to stand alone. Even with this page, to support the concept of electric potential, many crucial branches of the topic appeared, like potential difference (which also branched into [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_Path_Independence,_claimed_by_Aditya_Mohile Potential Difference Path Independence]], [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_in_a_Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Uniform Field]], and [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_of_Point_Charge_in_a_Non-Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Nonuniform Field]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External Links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] https://www.khanacademy.org/test-prep/mcat/physical-processes/electrostatics-1/v/electric-potential-at-a-point-in-space&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pcWz4tP_zUw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vpa_uApmNoo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] https://www.khanacademy.org/science/electrical-engineering/ee-electrostatics/ee-fields-potential-voltage/a/ee-electric-potential-voltage&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] &amp;quot;Benjamin Franklin and Electricity.&amp;quot; Benjamin Franklin and Electricity. N.p., n.d. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.americaslibrary.gov/aa/franklinb/aa_franklinb_electric_1.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Bottyan, Thomas. &amp;quot;Electrostatic Potential Maps.&amp;quot; Chemwiki. N.p., 02 Oct. 2013. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://chemwiki.ucdavis.edu/Core/Theoretical_Chemistry/Chemical_Bonding/General_Principles_of_Chemical_Bonding/Electrostatic_Potential_maps&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] &amp;quot;Electric Potential Difference.&amp;quot; Electric Potential Difference. The Physics Classroom, n.d. Web. 14 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/circuits/Lesson-1/Electric-Potential-Difference&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] Harland, C. J., T. D. Clark, and R. J. Prance. &amp;quot;Applications of Electric Potential (Displacement Current) Sensors in Human Body Electrophysiology.&amp;quot; International Society for Industrial Process Tomography, n.d. Web. 16 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.isipt.org/world-congress/3/269.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] Sherwood, Bruce A. &amp;quot;2.1 The Momentum Principle.&amp;quot; Matter &amp;amp; Interactions. By Ruth W. Chabay. 4th ed. Vol. 1. N.p.: John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons, 2015. 45-50. Print. Modern Mechanics.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurence12799</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=38629</id>
		<title>Electric Potential</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=38629"/>
		<updated>2020-03-24T20:42:14Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurence12799: /* A Mathematical Model */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039;, like all forms of potential energy, is the potential for work to be done, in this case by the electric force. The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; (frequently referred to as voltage, from its SI unit, the Volt) is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; associated with the test charge (1 Coulomb), such that it depends only on the source, just as the electric field is related to the electric force, but depends only on the source. One may similarly remember the parallel concept of the gravitational potential, which was gravitational potential energy divided by mass.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined with respect to the [[Electric Force]] &amp;amp; [[Electric Field]]:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} = - q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; from point b to point a&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the charge in the electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the source charge&#039;s electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a differential length along the path from point b to point a&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Derivation of Electric Potential Energy&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricPotentialPaths.png|400px|right|thumb|Some sets of electrically equivalent paths for a charge.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From this, the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; per test charge in the source charge&#039;s electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{U_{ab}}{q} = - \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The electric field is a &#039;&#039;conservative vector field&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:::This means that any path used in the above line integral will give the same value for the same beginning and end points (b and a). Looking at the figure to the right, many paths for a charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; subject to the electric field of source charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are shown. In each set of four paths (Green, Blue, Yellow, and Pink), the same amount of &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is gained or lost. &lt;br /&gt;
*A special case shown in dark green near the bottom right of the figure also exists:&lt;br /&gt;
:::If a charge is moving along a path that is always perpendicular to the electric field, the line integral will evaluate to zero, and therefore the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; will also evaluate to zero.&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is easily shown with the dot product; if two variable vectors are always perpendicular, then their dot product is always zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricPotentialRadial.png|400px|right|thumb|Illustration of radial potential.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; between two point charges &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(Q \ \text{and} \ q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be written in a simpler expression:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr ( \frac{1}{r_{a}} - \frac{1}{r_{b}} \biggr )&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the charge in the source&#039;s electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{a}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the final position &lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{b}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the initial position&lt;br /&gt;
:*The initial position is often taken to be infinity (the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined to be zero at infinity) creating a simpler and more familiar looking equation:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} r}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
:::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the distance between the source charge and the charge in the electric field&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is used to described the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; gained or lost when moving a charge radially closer to a source charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:800px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Derivation of Radial Potential&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
===Externals links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Main Idea ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electric potential energy, like all forms of potential energy, is the potential for work to be done, in this case by the electric force. The electric potential (frequently referred to as voltage, from its SI unit the Volt) is the electric potential energy associated with the test charge, such that it depends only on the source, just as the electric field is related to the electric force, but depends only on the source. One may similarly remember the parallel concept of the gravitational potential, which was gravitational potential energy divided by mass.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
====Electric Potential Energy====&lt;br /&gt;
Electric potential energy may be calculated in a variety of manners, depending upon the situation. The electric potential energy between two point charges may be written in a form which follows directly from the definition of the Coulomb force:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = \frac{qQ}{4\pi\epsilon_0 r_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is the amount of energy which would be required to bring one of the charged objects (by convention the small &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; q &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; charge) from an infinite distance to its current position, where, by convention, the potential energy at infinity is equal to zero. This may, therefore, be derived from the equation for work:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Derivation with Calculus=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -W = -\int_\infty^{r_0} \vec{F}_E(r) \cdot \text{d} \vec{r} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -\int_\infty^{r_0} \frac{qQ \hat{r}}{4\pi\epsilon_0 r^2} \cdot \text{d} \vec{r} = -\frac{qQ}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\int_\infty^{r_0} \frac{\hat{r} \cdot \hat{r}}{r^2} \text{d} r &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = \frac{qQ}{4\pi \epsilon_0} \biggr{(} \frac{1}{r} \biggr{|}_{\infty}^{r_0} = \frac{qQ}{4\pi \epsilon_0 r_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Given our definition of the [[Electric Field]], we have that &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vec{F}_E(r) = q\vec{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
so the electric potential energy may be generally written as &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -q\int_a^b \vec{E} \cdot \text{d} \vec{r} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Linear assumption=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the above equation, one can see that if the electric field is constant over the length of the path, then electric potential energy may be written in a simplified manner as&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = q\vec{E}\cdot\Delta \vec{s} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Electric Potential====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just as we divided by charge to go from electric force to electric field, dividing by charge takes us from the electric potential energy to the electric potential. For a test particle of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; q &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we define &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; V = \frac{U}{q} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Derivation with Calculus=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is not especially meaningful without choosing a reference point, just as for potential energy. Thus, one may speak of the potential difference between two points, which is independent of the reference value. From the above definition of electric potential energy, it is possible to derive an expression for the potential difference between two points from the electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\int_a^b \vec{E} \cdot \text{d} \vec{s} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The vectors are used to express the path associated with this integral. The difference in electric potential will be the same no matter what path one takes, as explored in [[Path Independence of Electric Potential]]. This also allows one to write the inverse relationship, determining the electric field at a given point from the electric potential in one and three dimensions respectively:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; E = -\frac{\text{d}V}{\text{d}x}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vec{E} = -\nabla V &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \nabla &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the gradient operator.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Linear Assumption=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The above equations allow us to write the equivalent expressions under an assumption of constant values for the electric field, such that the integral reduces to &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\vec{E} \cdot \Delta \vec{l} = -(E_x \Delta x + E_y \Delta y + E_z \Delta z)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This also leads directly to the inverse expression:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vec{E} = -(\frac{\Delta V_x}{\Delta x} + \frac{\Delta V_y}{\Delta y} + \frac{\Delta V_z}{\Delta z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric potential difference in a field which is nonuniform, but whose variations are discrete, is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\sum \vec{E}\cdot \Delta\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The different parts in this particular equation resembles the equation for the potential difference in an uniform field, except that with the nonuniform field, the potential difference in the different fields are summed up. This situation can be quite easy, but when the system gets difficult, first, choose a path and divide it into smaller pieces of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;; second, write an expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -\vec{E}\cdot\Delta\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of one piece; third, add up the contributions of all the pieces; last, check the result to make sure the magnitude, direction, and units make sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is important to keep track of the sign differences. If the path follows the direction of the electric field, the sign of the potential difference will be negative. This may be imagined as dropping a positive test charge in an electric field: a positive charge will be accelerated in the direction of the field, meaning that it is gaining energy, and so its potential must be decreasing. By contrast, if the path is opposite the direction of the field, potential will be increasing, much like rolling a boulder up a hill. If the path is perpendicular to the direction of the electric field, the dot product will be equal to zero. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, when working with different situations, it is nice to keep in mind that in a conductor, the electric field is zero. Therefore, the potential difference is zero as well. In an insulator, the electric field is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{E_{applied}}{K}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the dielectric constant. Furthermore, the potential difference over a round trip is equal to zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
Click on the link to see Electric Potential through VPython!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Make sure to press &amp;quot;Run&amp;quot; to see the principle in action!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://trinket.io/embed/glowscript/0a7e486c94 Teach hand-on with GlowScript]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Watch this video for a more visual approach! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Rb9guSEeVE Electric Potential: Visualizing Voltage with 3D animations]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--== Models ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric potential of a particle at a point is equal to the potential difference of that particle with respect to infinity. Since we know how to calculate the potential difference using the formula, we can see that this implies that the electric potential at infinity is equal to zero. What does this mean? This means that a particle that is extremely far away has no potential energy. This makes sense, because a proton will not be affected by the electric field of another proton at a distance of infinity apart. This subtle detail aids in solving a case of problems types later on.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although electric potential is an important topic to learn, most problems encountered will not ask to find just the &amp;quot;electric potential,&amp;quot; instead, questions will most likely ask for the &amp;quot;electric potential difference.&amp;quot; This is because electric potential is measured using different locations, or more specifically pathways between the different locations, so instead of determining the electric potential of location A and the electric potential of final location B, it would make more sense to determine the &amp;quot;difference in electric potential between locations A and B.&amp;quot; The following mathematical model will further explain this. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like mentioned before, instead of electric potential, in most cases, electric potential difference is needed to be found. The general equation for the potential difference is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{{U}_{electric}} = {q} * ∆{V} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{{U}_{electric}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric potential energy, which is measured in Joules (J). &#039;&#039;&#039;q&#039;&#039;&#039; is the charge of the particle moving through the path of the electric potential difference, which is measured in coulombs (C). &#039;&#039;&#039;∆V&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric potential difference, which is measured in Joules per Coulomb (J/C), or just Volts (V).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Aside from the general equation, the electric potential difference can also be found in other ways. The potential difference in an &#039;&#039;&#039;uniform field&#039;&#039;&#039; is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{V} = -({E}_{x}∆{x} + {E}_{y}∆{y} + {E}_{z}∆{z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;, which can also be written as &#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{V} = -\vec{E}·∆\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the electric potential difference, which is measured in Joules per Coulomb (J/C), or just Volts (V). &#039;&#039;&#039;E&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric field, which is measured in Newtons per Coulomb (N/C), and it is important to note that the different direction components of the electric field are used in the equation. &#039;&#039;&#039;l&#039;&#039;&#039; (or the &#039;&#039;&#039;x&#039;&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;&#039;y&#039;&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;&#039;z&#039;&#039;&#039;) is the distance between the two described locations, which is measured in meters, and x, y, and z, are the different components of the difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, when working with different situations, it is nice to keep in mind that in a conductor, the electric field is zero. Therefore, the potential difference is zero as well. In an insulator, the electric field is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;{E}_{applied} / K&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; where &#039;&#039;&#039;K&#039;&#039;&#039; is the dielectric constant. Also, the round trip potential difference is always zero, or in other words, if you start from a certain point and end at the same point, then, the potential difference will be zero. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
In a capacitor, the negative charges are located on the left plate, and the positive charges are located on the right plate. Location A is at the left end of the capacitor, and Location B is at the right end of the capacitor, or in other words, Location A and B are only different in terms of their x component location. The path moves from A to B. What is the direction of the electric field? Is the potential difference positive or negative? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ep125.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer: The electric field is to the left. The potential difference is increasing, or is positive.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
The electric field always moves away from the positive charge and towards the negative charge, which means the electric field in this example is to the left. Because the direction and the electric field and the direction of the path are opposite, the potential difference is increasing, or is positive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Calculate the change in electric potential between point A, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(-4, 3,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and B, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(2,-2,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; . The electric field in the location is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; (50,0,0) \; N/C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:EP mid fig.png ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer: -300V&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta\vec{l}= (2,-2,0)\;m - (-4,3,0)\;m = (6,-5,0)\;m &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -({E}_{x}∆{x} + {E}_{y}∆{y} + {E}_{z}∆{z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -(50\; N/C \cdot 6 \;m + 0 \; N/c \cdot -5 \; m + 0\cdot 0)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -300 V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Bohr Model]] of the hydrogen atom treats it as a nucleus of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; +e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; electrons of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; orbiting in circular orbits of specific radii. Calculate the potential difference between two points, one infinitely far away from the nucleus, and the other one Bohr radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; away from the nucleus (don&#039;t worry about substituting in the values). Compute the electric potential energy associated with the electron one Bohr radius away from the nucleus, setting the potential energy at infinity as zero (remember the sign of the charge). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We may compute the electric potential by taking integrating the electric field of a point charge as the radius goes from infinity to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. This integral may be set up as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\int_\infty^{a_0} \vec{E}\cdot\text{d}\vec{l} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \int_\infty^{a_0} \frac{\text{d} r}{r^2} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This may then be solved:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\biggr{(}\frac{1}{r}\biggr{|}_\infty^{a_0} = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
to compute the potential energy, we now multiply by the charge of the electron: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, giving &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -\frac{e^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Depending on what physics or chemistry courses you may have taken before, this may be recognizable as twice the ionization energy of the n=1 orbital. The factor of two is due to the fact that in the Bohr model, the kinetic energy will be exactly half of this potential energy, and will be positive so that the net result is still negative, but with half the magnitude. This understanding of the hydrogen atom gets certain values right, but the reality of the situation is far more complicated. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is this topic connected to something that you are interested in?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am interested in robotic systems and building circuit boards and electrical systems for manufacturing robots. While studying this section in the book, I was able to connect back many of the concepts and calculations back to robotics and the electrical component of automated systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Since high school, I never really understood how to work with the voltmeter and what it measured, and I have always wanted to know, but although this particular wiki page did not go into the details and other branches of electric potential, it led me to find the answers to something I was interested in since high school, the concept of electric potential.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I think electively is really interesting. When I was younger, I participated in this demo where a group of people hold hands and someone touches this special ball full of charge. We all could feel the tingling sensation of the current passing through us. It’s cool to learn the theory behind the supposed magic that occurs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I think it&#039;s very interesting that electric potential can be seen as a property of a space and that we can have further applications using this property.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is it connected to your major?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am a Mechanical Engineering major, so I will be dealing with the electrical components of machines when I work. Therefore, I have to know these certain concepts such as electric potential in order to fully understand how they work and interact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revistionist] As a biochemistry major, electric potential and electric potential difference is not particularly related to my major, but in chemistry classes, we use electrostatic potential maps (electrostatic potential energy maps) that shows the charge distributions throughout a molecule. Although the main use in electric potential is different in physics and biochemistry (where physicists use it identify the effect of the electric field at a location), I still found it interesting as the concept of electric potential (buildup) was being used in quite a different way. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I am a computer science major. Although I deal mostly with software, the hardware aspect is still important. The algorithms that I design run differently on different machines. The time complexity of an algorithm is sometimes useless when worrying about constant factors that are determined by a system’s hardware. Quicksort, for instance, is usually faster than many other sorts that have lower time complexities. The hardware of computers heavily relies on electricity and current (which is induced by a potential difference) to switch transistors on and off and thereby process information. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I am an aerospace engineering major, and I think understanding such concepts will help me have a better holistic understanding towards fields and systems. In addition, the thinking behind solving related problems will help me better prepared for future classes that involve with solving dynamics problems. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Is there an interesting industrial application?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] Electrical potential is used to find the voltage across a path. This is useful when working with circuit components and attempting to manipulate the power output or current throughout a component.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Electric potential sensors are being used to detect a variety of electrical signals made by the human body, thus contributing to the field of electrophysiology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] The study of electric potential has lead scientists to generate very safe wires that will not overheat and cause fires. Connecting circuits to ground is important and the third prong in an electrical outlet is this ground connection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The idea of electric potential, in a way, started with Ben Franklin and his experiments in the 1740s. He began to understand the flow of electricity, which eventually paved the path towards explaining electric potential and potential difference. Scientists finally began to understand how electric fields were actually affecting the charges and the surrounding environment. Benjamin Franklin first shocked himself in 1746, while conducting experiments on electricity with found objects from around his house. Six years later, or 261 years ago for us, the founding father flew a kite attached to a key and a silk ribbon in a thunderstorm and effectively trapped lightning in a jar. The experiment is now seen as a watershed moment in mankind&#039;s venture to channel a force of nature that was viewed quite abstractly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the time Franklin started experimenting with electricity, he&#039;d already found fame and fortune as the author of Poor Richard&#039;s Almanack. Electricity wasn&#039;t a very well understood phenomenon at that point, so Franklin&#039;s research proved to be fairly foundational. The early experiments, experts believe, were inspired by other scientists&#039; work and the shortcomings therein.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ep135.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
source: http://www.benjamin-franklin-history.org/kite-experiment/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That early brush with the dangers of electricity left an impression on Franklin. He described the sensation as &amp;quot;a universal blow throughout my whole body from head to foot, which seemed within as well as without; after which the first thing I took notice of was a violent quick shaking of my body.&amp;quot; However, it didn&#039;t scare him away. In the handful of years before his famous kite experiment, Franklin contributed everything from designing the first battery designs to establishing some common nomenclature in the study of electricity. Although Franklin is often coined the father of electricity, after he set the foundations of electricity, many other scientists contributed his or her research in the advancement of electricity and eventually led to the discovery of electric potential and potential difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like mentioned multiple times throughout the page, although electric potential is a huge and important topic, it has many branches, which makes the concept of electric potential difficult to stand alone. Even with this page, to support the concept of electric potential, many crucial branches of the topic appeared, like potential difference (which also branched into [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_Path_Independence,_claimed_by_Aditya_Mohile Potential Difference Path Independence]], [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_in_a_Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Uniform Field]], and [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_of_Point_Charge_in_a_Non-Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Nonuniform Field]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External Links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] https://www.khanacademy.org/test-prep/mcat/physical-processes/electrostatics-1/v/electric-potential-at-a-point-in-space&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pcWz4tP_zUw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vpa_uApmNoo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] https://www.khanacademy.org/science/electrical-engineering/ee-electrostatics/ee-fields-potential-voltage/a/ee-electric-potential-voltage&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] &amp;quot;Benjamin Franklin and Electricity.&amp;quot; Benjamin Franklin and Electricity. N.p., n.d. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.americaslibrary.gov/aa/franklinb/aa_franklinb_electric_1.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Bottyan, Thomas. &amp;quot;Electrostatic Potential Maps.&amp;quot; Chemwiki. N.p., 02 Oct. 2013. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://chemwiki.ucdavis.edu/Core/Theoretical_Chemistry/Chemical_Bonding/General_Principles_of_Chemical_Bonding/Electrostatic_Potential_maps&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] &amp;quot;Electric Potential Difference.&amp;quot; Electric Potential Difference. The Physics Classroom, n.d. Web. 14 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/circuits/Lesson-1/Electric-Potential-Difference&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] Harland, C. J., T. D. Clark, and R. J. Prance. &amp;quot;Applications of Electric Potential (Displacement Current) Sensors in Human Body Electrophysiology.&amp;quot; International Society for Industrial Process Tomography, n.d. Web. 16 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.isipt.org/world-congress/3/269.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] Sherwood, Bruce A. &amp;quot;2.1 The Momentum Principle.&amp;quot; Matter &amp;amp; Interactions. By Ruth W. Chabay. 4th ed. Vol. 1. N.p.: John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons, 2015. 45-50. Print. Modern Mechanics.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurence12799</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=38628</id>
		<title>Electric Potential</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=38628"/>
		<updated>2020-03-24T20:41:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurence12799: /* A Mathematical Model */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039;, like all forms of potential energy, is the potential for work to be done, in this case by the electric force. The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; (frequently referred to as voltage, from its SI unit, the Volt) is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; associated with the test charge (1 Coulomb), such that it depends only on the source, just as the electric field is related to the electric force, but depends only on the source. One may similarly remember the parallel concept of the gravitational potential, which was gravitational potential energy divided by mass.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined with respect to the [[Electric Force]] &amp;amp; [[Electric Field]]:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} = - q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; from point b to point a&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the charge in the electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the source charge&#039;s electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a differential length along the path from point b to point a&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Derivation of Electric Potential Energy&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricPotentialPaths.png|400px|right|thumb|Some sets of electrically equivalent paths for a charge.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From this, the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; per test charge in the source charge&#039;s electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{U_{ab}}{q} = - \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The electric field is a &#039;&#039;conservative vector field&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:::This means that any path used in the above line integral will give the same value for the same beginning and end points (b and a). Looking at the figure to the right, many paths for a charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; subject to the electric field of source charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are shown. In each set of four paths (Green, Blue, Yellow, and Pink), the same amount of &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is gained or lost. &lt;br /&gt;
*A special case shown in dark green near the bottom right of the figure also exists:&lt;br /&gt;
:::If a charge is moving along a path that is always perpendicular to the electric field, the line integral will evaluate to zero, and therefore the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; will also evaluate to zero.&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is easily shown with the dot product; if two variable vectors are always perpendicular, then their dot product is always zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricPotentialRadial.png|400px|right|thumb|Illustration of radial potential.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; between two point charges &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(Q \ \text{and} \ q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be written in a simpler expression:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr ( \frac{1}{r_{a}} - \frac{1}{r_{b}} \biggr )&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the charge in the source&#039;s electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{a}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the final position &lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{b}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the initial position&lt;br /&gt;
:*The initial position is often taken to be infinity (the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined to be zero at infinity) creating a simpler and more familiar looking equation:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} r}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
:::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the distance between the source charge and the charge in the electric field&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is used to described the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; gained or lost when moving a charge radially closer to a source charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Derivation of Radial Potential&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
===Externals links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Main Idea ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electric potential energy, like all forms of potential energy, is the potential for work to be done, in this case by the electric force. The electric potential (frequently referred to as voltage, from its SI unit the Volt) is the electric potential energy associated with the test charge, such that it depends only on the source, just as the electric field is related to the electric force, but depends only on the source. One may similarly remember the parallel concept of the gravitational potential, which was gravitational potential energy divided by mass.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
====Electric Potential Energy====&lt;br /&gt;
Electric potential energy may be calculated in a variety of manners, depending upon the situation. The electric potential energy between two point charges may be written in a form which follows directly from the definition of the Coulomb force:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = \frac{qQ}{4\pi\epsilon_0 r_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is the amount of energy which would be required to bring one of the charged objects (by convention the small &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; q &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; charge) from an infinite distance to its current position, where, by convention, the potential energy at infinity is equal to zero. This may, therefore, be derived from the equation for work:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Derivation with Calculus=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -W = -\int_\infty^{r_0} \vec{F}_E(r) \cdot \text{d} \vec{r} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -\int_\infty^{r_0} \frac{qQ \hat{r}}{4\pi\epsilon_0 r^2} \cdot \text{d} \vec{r} = -\frac{qQ}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\int_\infty^{r_0} \frac{\hat{r} \cdot \hat{r}}{r^2} \text{d} r &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = \frac{qQ}{4\pi \epsilon_0} \biggr{(} \frac{1}{r} \biggr{|}_{\infty}^{r_0} = \frac{qQ}{4\pi \epsilon_0 r_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Given our definition of the [[Electric Field]], we have that &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vec{F}_E(r) = q\vec{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
so the electric potential energy may be generally written as &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -q\int_a^b \vec{E} \cdot \text{d} \vec{r} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Linear assumption=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the above equation, one can see that if the electric field is constant over the length of the path, then electric potential energy may be written in a simplified manner as&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = q\vec{E}\cdot\Delta \vec{s} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Electric Potential====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just as we divided by charge to go from electric force to electric field, dividing by charge takes us from the electric potential energy to the electric potential. For a test particle of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; q &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we define &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; V = \frac{U}{q} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Derivation with Calculus=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is not especially meaningful without choosing a reference point, just as for potential energy. Thus, one may speak of the potential difference between two points, which is independent of the reference value. From the above definition of electric potential energy, it is possible to derive an expression for the potential difference between two points from the electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\int_a^b \vec{E} \cdot \text{d} \vec{s} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The vectors are used to express the path associated with this integral. The difference in electric potential will be the same no matter what path one takes, as explored in [[Path Independence of Electric Potential]]. This also allows one to write the inverse relationship, determining the electric field at a given point from the electric potential in one and three dimensions respectively:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; E = -\frac{\text{d}V}{\text{d}x}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vec{E} = -\nabla V &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \nabla &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the gradient operator.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Linear Assumption=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The above equations allow us to write the equivalent expressions under an assumption of constant values for the electric field, such that the integral reduces to &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\vec{E} \cdot \Delta \vec{l} = -(E_x \Delta x + E_y \Delta y + E_z \Delta z)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This also leads directly to the inverse expression:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vec{E} = -(\frac{\Delta V_x}{\Delta x} + \frac{\Delta V_y}{\Delta y} + \frac{\Delta V_z}{\Delta z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric potential difference in a field which is nonuniform, but whose variations are discrete, is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\sum \vec{E}\cdot \Delta\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The different parts in this particular equation resembles the equation for the potential difference in an uniform field, except that with the nonuniform field, the potential difference in the different fields are summed up. This situation can be quite easy, but when the system gets difficult, first, choose a path and divide it into smaller pieces of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;; second, write an expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -\vec{E}\cdot\Delta\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of one piece; third, add up the contributions of all the pieces; last, check the result to make sure the magnitude, direction, and units make sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is important to keep track of the sign differences. If the path follows the direction of the electric field, the sign of the potential difference will be negative. This may be imagined as dropping a positive test charge in an electric field: a positive charge will be accelerated in the direction of the field, meaning that it is gaining energy, and so its potential must be decreasing. By contrast, if the path is opposite the direction of the field, potential will be increasing, much like rolling a boulder up a hill. If the path is perpendicular to the direction of the electric field, the dot product will be equal to zero. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, when working with different situations, it is nice to keep in mind that in a conductor, the electric field is zero. Therefore, the potential difference is zero as well. In an insulator, the electric field is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{E_{applied}}{K}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the dielectric constant. Furthermore, the potential difference over a round trip is equal to zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
Click on the link to see Electric Potential through VPython!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Make sure to press &amp;quot;Run&amp;quot; to see the principle in action!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://trinket.io/embed/glowscript/0a7e486c94 Teach hand-on with GlowScript]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Watch this video for a more visual approach! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Rb9guSEeVE Electric Potential: Visualizing Voltage with 3D animations]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--== Models ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric potential of a particle at a point is equal to the potential difference of that particle with respect to infinity. Since we know how to calculate the potential difference using the formula, we can see that this implies that the electric potential at infinity is equal to zero. What does this mean? This means that a particle that is extremely far away has no potential energy. This makes sense, because a proton will not be affected by the electric field of another proton at a distance of infinity apart. This subtle detail aids in solving a case of problems types later on.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although electric potential is an important topic to learn, most problems encountered will not ask to find just the &amp;quot;electric potential,&amp;quot; instead, questions will most likely ask for the &amp;quot;electric potential difference.&amp;quot; This is because electric potential is measured using different locations, or more specifically pathways between the different locations, so instead of determining the electric potential of location A and the electric potential of final location B, it would make more sense to determine the &amp;quot;difference in electric potential between locations A and B.&amp;quot; The following mathematical model will further explain this. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like mentioned before, instead of electric potential, in most cases, electric potential difference is needed to be found. The general equation for the potential difference is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{{U}_{electric}} = {q} * ∆{V} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{{U}_{electric}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric potential energy, which is measured in Joules (J). &#039;&#039;&#039;q&#039;&#039;&#039; is the charge of the particle moving through the path of the electric potential difference, which is measured in coulombs (C). &#039;&#039;&#039;∆V&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric potential difference, which is measured in Joules per Coulomb (J/C), or just Volts (V).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Aside from the general equation, the electric potential difference can also be found in other ways. The potential difference in an &#039;&#039;&#039;uniform field&#039;&#039;&#039; is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{V} = -({E}_{x}∆{x} + {E}_{y}∆{y} + {E}_{z}∆{z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;, which can also be written as &#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{V} = -\vec{E}·∆\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the electric potential difference, which is measured in Joules per Coulomb (J/C), or just Volts (V). &#039;&#039;&#039;E&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric field, which is measured in Newtons per Coulomb (N/C), and it is important to note that the different direction components of the electric field are used in the equation. &#039;&#039;&#039;l&#039;&#039;&#039; (or the &#039;&#039;&#039;x&#039;&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;&#039;y&#039;&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;&#039;z&#039;&#039;&#039;) is the distance between the two described locations, which is measured in meters, and x, y, and z, are the different components of the difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, when working with different situations, it is nice to keep in mind that in a conductor, the electric field is zero. Therefore, the potential difference is zero as well. In an insulator, the electric field is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;{E}_{applied} / K&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; where &#039;&#039;&#039;K&#039;&#039;&#039; is the dielectric constant. Also, the round trip potential difference is always zero, or in other words, if you start from a certain point and end at the same point, then, the potential difference will be zero. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
In a capacitor, the negative charges are located on the left plate, and the positive charges are located on the right plate. Location A is at the left end of the capacitor, and Location B is at the right end of the capacitor, or in other words, Location A and B are only different in terms of their x component location. The path moves from A to B. What is the direction of the electric field? Is the potential difference positive or negative? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ep125.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer: The electric field is to the left. The potential difference is increasing, or is positive.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
The electric field always moves away from the positive charge and towards the negative charge, which means the electric field in this example is to the left. Because the direction and the electric field and the direction of the path are opposite, the potential difference is increasing, or is positive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Calculate the change in electric potential between point A, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(-4, 3,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and B, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(2,-2,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; . The electric field in the location is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; (50,0,0) \; N/C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:EP mid fig.png ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer: -300V&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta\vec{l}= (2,-2,0)\;m - (-4,3,0)\;m = (6,-5,0)\;m &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -({E}_{x}∆{x} + {E}_{y}∆{y} + {E}_{z}∆{z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -(50\; N/C \cdot 6 \;m + 0 \; N/c \cdot -5 \; m + 0\cdot 0)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -300 V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Bohr Model]] of the hydrogen atom treats it as a nucleus of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; +e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; electrons of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; orbiting in circular orbits of specific radii. Calculate the potential difference between two points, one infinitely far away from the nucleus, and the other one Bohr radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; away from the nucleus (don&#039;t worry about substituting in the values). Compute the electric potential energy associated with the electron one Bohr radius away from the nucleus, setting the potential energy at infinity as zero (remember the sign of the charge). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We may compute the electric potential by taking integrating the electric field of a point charge as the radius goes from infinity to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. This integral may be set up as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\int_\infty^{a_0} \vec{E}\cdot\text{d}\vec{l} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \int_\infty^{a_0} \frac{\text{d} r}{r^2} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This may then be solved:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\biggr{(}\frac{1}{r}\biggr{|}_\infty^{a_0} = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
to compute the potential energy, we now multiply by the charge of the electron: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, giving &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -\frac{e^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Depending on what physics or chemistry courses you may have taken before, this may be recognizable as twice the ionization energy of the n=1 orbital. The factor of two is due to the fact that in the Bohr model, the kinetic energy will be exactly half of this potential energy, and will be positive so that the net result is still negative, but with half the magnitude. This understanding of the hydrogen atom gets certain values right, but the reality of the situation is far more complicated. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is this topic connected to something that you are interested in?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am interested in robotic systems and building circuit boards and electrical systems for manufacturing robots. While studying this section in the book, I was able to connect back many of the concepts and calculations back to robotics and the electrical component of automated systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Since high school, I never really understood how to work with the voltmeter and what it measured, and I have always wanted to know, but although this particular wiki page did not go into the details and other branches of electric potential, it led me to find the answers to something I was interested in since high school, the concept of electric potential.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I think electively is really interesting. When I was younger, I participated in this demo where a group of people hold hands and someone touches this special ball full of charge. We all could feel the tingling sensation of the current passing through us. It’s cool to learn the theory behind the supposed magic that occurs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I think it&#039;s very interesting that electric potential can be seen as a property of a space and that we can have further applications using this property.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is it connected to your major?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am a Mechanical Engineering major, so I will be dealing with the electrical components of machines when I work. Therefore, I have to know these certain concepts such as electric potential in order to fully understand how they work and interact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revistionist] As a biochemistry major, electric potential and electric potential difference is not particularly related to my major, but in chemistry classes, we use electrostatic potential maps (electrostatic potential energy maps) that shows the charge distributions throughout a molecule. Although the main use in electric potential is different in physics and biochemistry (where physicists use it identify the effect of the electric field at a location), I still found it interesting as the concept of electric potential (buildup) was being used in quite a different way. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I am a computer science major. Although I deal mostly with software, the hardware aspect is still important. The algorithms that I design run differently on different machines. The time complexity of an algorithm is sometimes useless when worrying about constant factors that are determined by a system’s hardware. Quicksort, for instance, is usually faster than many other sorts that have lower time complexities. The hardware of computers heavily relies on electricity and current (which is induced by a potential difference) to switch transistors on and off and thereby process information. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I am an aerospace engineering major, and I think understanding such concepts will help me have a better holistic understanding towards fields and systems. In addition, the thinking behind solving related problems will help me better prepared for future classes that involve with solving dynamics problems. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Is there an interesting industrial application?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] Electrical potential is used to find the voltage across a path. This is useful when working with circuit components and attempting to manipulate the power output or current throughout a component.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Electric potential sensors are being used to detect a variety of electrical signals made by the human body, thus contributing to the field of electrophysiology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] The study of electric potential has lead scientists to generate very safe wires that will not overheat and cause fires. Connecting circuits to ground is important and the third prong in an electrical outlet is this ground connection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The idea of electric potential, in a way, started with Ben Franklin and his experiments in the 1740s. He began to understand the flow of electricity, which eventually paved the path towards explaining electric potential and potential difference. Scientists finally began to understand how electric fields were actually affecting the charges and the surrounding environment. Benjamin Franklin first shocked himself in 1746, while conducting experiments on electricity with found objects from around his house. Six years later, or 261 years ago for us, the founding father flew a kite attached to a key and a silk ribbon in a thunderstorm and effectively trapped lightning in a jar. The experiment is now seen as a watershed moment in mankind&#039;s venture to channel a force of nature that was viewed quite abstractly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the time Franklin started experimenting with electricity, he&#039;d already found fame and fortune as the author of Poor Richard&#039;s Almanack. Electricity wasn&#039;t a very well understood phenomenon at that point, so Franklin&#039;s research proved to be fairly foundational. The early experiments, experts believe, were inspired by other scientists&#039; work and the shortcomings therein.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ep135.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
source: http://www.benjamin-franklin-history.org/kite-experiment/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That early brush with the dangers of electricity left an impression on Franklin. He described the sensation as &amp;quot;a universal blow throughout my whole body from head to foot, which seemed within as well as without; after which the first thing I took notice of was a violent quick shaking of my body.&amp;quot; However, it didn&#039;t scare him away. In the handful of years before his famous kite experiment, Franklin contributed everything from designing the first battery designs to establishing some common nomenclature in the study of electricity. Although Franklin is often coined the father of electricity, after he set the foundations of electricity, many other scientists contributed his or her research in the advancement of electricity and eventually led to the discovery of electric potential and potential difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like mentioned multiple times throughout the page, although electric potential is a huge and important topic, it has many branches, which makes the concept of electric potential difficult to stand alone. Even with this page, to support the concept of electric potential, many crucial branches of the topic appeared, like potential difference (which also branched into [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_Path_Independence,_claimed_by_Aditya_Mohile Potential Difference Path Independence]], [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_in_a_Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Uniform Field]], and [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_of_Point_Charge_in_a_Non-Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Nonuniform Field]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External Links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] https://www.khanacademy.org/test-prep/mcat/physical-processes/electrostatics-1/v/electric-potential-at-a-point-in-space&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pcWz4tP_zUw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vpa_uApmNoo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] https://www.khanacademy.org/science/electrical-engineering/ee-electrostatics/ee-fields-potential-voltage/a/ee-electric-potential-voltage&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] &amp;quot;Benjamin Franklin and Electricity.&amp;quot; Benjamin Franklin and Electricity. N.p., n.d. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.americaslibrary.gov/aa/franklinb/aa_franklinb_electric_1.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Bottyan, Thomas. &amp;quot;Electrostatic Potential Maps.&amp;quot; Chemwiki. N.p., 02 Oct. 2013. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://chemwiki.ucdavis.edu/Core/Theoretical_Chemistry/Chemical_Bonding/General_Principles_of_Chemical_Bonding/Electrostatic_Potential_maps&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] &amp;quot;Electric Potential Difference.&amp;quot; Electric Potential Difference. The Physics Classroom, n.d. Web. 14 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/circuits/Lesson-1/Electric-Potential-Difference&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] Harland, C. J., T. D. Clark, and R. J. Prance. &amp;quot;Applications of Electric Potential (Displacement Current) Sensors in Human Body Electrophysiology.&amp;quot; International Society for Industrial Process Tomography, n.d. Web. 16 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.isipt.org/world-congress/3/269.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] Sherwood, Bruce A. &amp;quot;2.1 The Momentum Principle.&amp;quot; Matter &amp;amp; Interactions. By Ruth W. Chabay. 4th ed. Vol. 1. N.p.: John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons, 2015. 45-50. Print. Modern Mechanics.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurence12799</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=38627</id>
		<title>Electric Potential</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=38627"/>
		<updated>2020-03-24T20:41:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurence12799: /* A Mathematical Model */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039;, like all forms of potential energy, is the potential for work to be done, in this case by the electric force. The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; (frequently referred to as voltage, from its SI unit, the Volt) is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; associated with the test charge (1 Coulomb), such that it depends only on the source, just as the electric field is related to the electric force, but depends only on the source. One may similarly remember the parallel concept of the gravitational potential, which was gravitational potential energy divided by mass.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined with respect to the [[Electric Force]] &amp;amp; [[Electric Field]]:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} = - q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; from point b to point a&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the charge in the electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the source charge&#039;s electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a differential length along the path from point b to point a&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Derivation&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricPotentialPaths.png|400px|right|thumb|Some sets of electrically equivalent paths for a charge.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From this, the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; per test charge in the source charge&#039;s electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{U_{ab}}{q} = - \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The electric field is a &#039;&#039;conservative vector field&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:::This means that any path used in the above line integral will give the same value for the same beginning and end points (b and a). Looking at the figure to the right, many paths for a charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; subject to the electric field of source charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are shown. In each set of four paths (Green, Blue, Yellow, and Pink), the same amount of &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is gained or lost. &lt;br /&gt;
*A special case shown in dark green near the bottom right of the figure also exists:&lt;br /&gt;
:::If a charge is moving along a path that is always perpendicular to the electric field, the line integral will evaluate to zero, and therefore the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; will also evaluate to zero.&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is easily shown with the dot product; if two variable vectors are always perpendicular, then their dot product is always zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricPotentialRadial.png|400px|right|thumb|Illustration of radial potential.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; between two point charges &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(Q \ \text{and} \ q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be written in a simpler expression:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr ( \frac{1}{r_{a}} - \frac{1}{r_{b}} \biggr )&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the charge in the source&#039;s electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{a}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the final position &lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{b}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the initial position&lt;br /&gt;
:*The initial position is often taken to be infinity (the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined to be zero at infinity) creating a simpler and more familiar looking equation:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} r}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
:::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the distance between the source charge and the charge in the electric field&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is used to described the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; gained or lost when moving a charge radially closer to a source charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Derivation of Radial Potential&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
===Externals links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Main Idea ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electric potential energy, like all forms of potential energy, is the potential for work to be done, in this case by the electric force. The electric potential (frequently referred to as voltage, from its SI unit the Volt) is the electric potential energy associated with the test charge, such that it depends only on the source, just as the electric field is related to the electric force, but depends only on the source. One may similarly remember the parallel concept of the gravitational potential, which was gravitational potential energy divided by mass.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
====Electric Potential Energy====&lt;br /&gt;
Electric potential energy may be calculated in a variety of manners, depending upon the situation. The electric potential energy between two point charges may be written in a form which follows directly from the definition of the Coulomb force:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = \frac{qQ}{4\pi\epsilon_0 r_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is the amount of energy which would be required to bring one of the charged objects (by convention the small &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; q &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; charge) from an infinite distance to its current position, where, by convention, the potential energy at infinity is equal to zero. This may, therefore, be derived from the equation for work:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Derivation with Calculus=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -W = -\int_\infty^{r_0} \vec{F}_E(r) \cdot \text{d} \vec{r} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -\int_\infty^{r_0} \frac{qQ \hat{r}}{4\pi\epsilon_0 r^2} \cdot \text{d} \vec{r} = -\frac{qQ}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\int_\infty^{r_0} \frac{\hat{r} \cdot \hat{r}}{r^2} \text{d} r &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = \frac{qQ}{4\pi \epsilon_0} \biggr{(} \frac{1}{r} \biggr{|}_{\infty}^{r_0} = \frac{qQ}{4\pi \epsilon_0 r_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Given our definition of the [[Electric Field]], we have that &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vec{F}_E(r) = q\vec{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
so the electric potential energy may be generally written as &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -q\int_a^b \vec{E} \cdot \text{d} \vec{r} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Linear assumption=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the above equation, one can see that if the electric field is constant over the length of the path, then electric potential energy may be written in a simplified manner as&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = q\vec{E}\cdot\Delta \vec{s} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Electric Potential====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just as we divided by charge to go from electric force to electric field, dividing by charge takes us from the electric potential energy to the electric potential. For a test particle of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; q &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we define &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; V = \frac{U}{q} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Derivation with Calculus=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is not especially meaningful without choosing a reference point, just as for potential energy. Thus, one may speak of the potential difference between two points, which is independent of the reference value. From the above definition of electric potential energy, it is possible to derive an expression for the potential difference between two points from the electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\int_a^b \vec{E} \cdot \text{d} \vec{s} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The vectors are used to express the path associated with this integral. The difference in electric potential will be the same no matter what path one takes, as explored in [[Path Independence of Electric Potential]]. This also allows one to write the inverse relationship, determining the electric field at a given point from the electric potential in one and three dimensions respectively:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; E = -\frac{\text{d}V}{\text{d}x}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vec{E} = -\nabla V &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \nabla &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the gradient operator.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Linear Assumption=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The above equations allow us to write the equivalent expressions under an assumption of constant values for the electric field, such that the integral reduces to &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\vec{E} \cdot \Delta \vec{l} = -(E_x \Delta x + E_y \Delta y + E_z \Delta z)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This also leads directly to the inverse expression:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vec{E} = -(\frac{\Delta V_x}{\Delta x} + \frac{\Delta V_y}{\Delta y} + \frac{\Delta V_z}{\Delta z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric potential difference in a field which is nonuniform, but whose variations are discrete, is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\sum \vec{E}\cdot \Delta\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The different parts in this particular equation resembles the equation for the potential difference in an uniform field, except that with the nonuniform field, the potential difference in the different fields are summed up. This situation can be quite easy, but when the system gets difficult, first, choose a path and divide it into smaller pieces of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;; second, write an expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -\vec{E}\cdot\Delta\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of one piece; third, add up the contributions of all the pieces; last, check the result to make sure the magnitude, direction, and units make sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is important to keep track of the sign differences. If the path follows the direction of the electric field, the sign of the potential difference will be negative. This may be imagined as dropping a positive test charge in an electric field: a positive charge will be accelerated in the direction of the field, meaning that it is gaining energy, and so its potential must be decreasing. By contrast, if the path is opposite the direction of the field, potential will be increasing, much like rolling a boulder up a hill. If the path is perpendicular to the direction of the electric field, the dot product will be equal to zero. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, when working with different situations, it is nice to keep in mind that in a conductor, the electric field is zero. Therefore, the potential difference is zero as well. In an insulator, the electric field is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{E_{applied}}{K}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the dielectric constant. Furthermore, the potential difference over a round trip is equal to zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
Click on the link to see Electric Potential through VPython!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Make sure to press &amp;quot;Run&amp;quot; to see the principle in action!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://trinket.io/embed/glowscript/0a7e486c94 Teach hand-on with GlowScript]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Watch this video for a more visual approach! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Rb9guSEeVE Electric Potential: Visualizing Voltage with 3D animations]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--== Models ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric potential of a particle at a point is equal to the potential difference of that particle with respect to infinity. Since we know how to calculate the potential difference using the formula, we can see that this implies that the electric potential at infinity is equal to zero. What does this mean? This means that a particle that is extremely far away has no potential energy. This makes sense, because a proton will not be affected by the electric field of another proton at a distance of infinity apart. This subtle detail aids in solving a case of problems types later on.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although electric potential is an important topic to learn, most problems encountered will not ask to find just the &amp;quot;electric potential,&amp;quot; instead, questions will most likely ask for the &amp;quot;electric potential difference.&amp;quot; This is because electric potential is measured using different locations, or more specifically pathways between the different locations, so instead of determining the electric potential of location A and the electric potential of final location B, it would make more sense to determine the &amp;quot;difference in electric potential between locations A and B.&amp;quot; The following mathematical model will further explain this. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like mentioned before, instead of electric potential, in most cases, electric potential difference is needed to be found. The general equation for the potential difference is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{{U}_{electric}} = {q} * ∆{V} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{{U}_{electric}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric potential energy, which is measured in Joules (J). &#039;&#039;&#039;q&#039;&#039;&#039; is the charge of the particle moving through the path of the electric potential difference, which is measured in coulombs (C). &#039;&#039;&#039;∆V&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric potential difference, which is measured in Joules per Coulomb (J/C), or just Volts (V).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Aside from the general equation, the electric potential difference can also be found in other ways. The potential difference in an &#039;&#039;&#039;uniform field&#039;&#039;&#039; is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{V} = -({E}_{x}∆{x} + {E}_{y}∆{y} + {E}_{z}∆{z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;, which can also be written as &#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{V} = -\vec{E}·∆\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the electric potential difference, which is measured in Joules per Coulomb (J/C), or just Volts (V). &#039;&#039;&#039;E&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric field, which is measured in Newtons per Coulomb (N/C), and it is important to note that the different direction components of the electric field are used in the equation. &#039;&#039;&#039;l&#039;&#039;&#039; (or the &#039;&#039;&#039;x&#039;&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;&#039;y&#039;&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;&#039;z&#039;&#039;&#039;) is the distance between the two described locations, which is measured in meters, and x, y, and z, are the different components of the difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, when working with different situations, it is nice to keep in mind that in a conductor, the electric field is zero. Therefore, the potential difference is zero as well. In an insulator, the electric field is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;{E}_{applied} / K&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; where &#039;&#039;&#039;K&#039;&#039;&#039; is the dielectric constant. Also, the round trip potential difference is always zero, or in other words, if you start from a certain point and end at the same point, then, the potential difference will be zero. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
In a capacitor, the negative charges are located on the left plate, and the positive charges are located on the right plate. Location A is at the left end of the capacitor, and Location B is at the right end of the capacitor, or in other words, Location A and B are only different in terms of their x component location. The path moves from A to B. What is the direction of the electric field? Is the potential difference positive or negative? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ep125.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer: The electric field is to the left. The potential difference is increasing, or is positive.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
The electric field always moves away from the positive charge and towards the negative charge, which means the electric field in this example is to the left. Because the direction and the electric field and the direction of the path are opposite, the potential difference is increasing, or is positive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Calculate the change in electric potential between point A, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(-4, 3,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and B, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(2,-2,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; . The electric field in the location is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; (50,0,0) \; N/C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:EP mid fig.png ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer: -300V&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta\vec{l}= (2,-2,0)\;m - (-4,3,0)\;m = (6,-5,0)\;m &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -({E}_{x}∆{x} + {E}_{y}∆{y} + {E}_{z}∆{z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -(50\; N/C \cdot 6 \;m + 0 \; N/c \cdot -5 \; m + 0\cdot 0)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -300 V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Bohr Model]] of the hydrogen atom treats it as a nucleus of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; +e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; electrons of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; orbiting in circular orbits of specific radii. Calculate the potential difference between two points, one infinitely far away from the nucleus, and the other one Bohr radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; away from the nucleus (don&#039;t worry about substituting in the values). Compute the electric potential energy associated with the electron one Bohr radius away from the nucleus, setting the potential energy at infinity as zero (remember the sign of the charge). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We may compute the electric potential by taking integrating the electric field of a point charge as the radius goes from infinity to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. This integral may be set up as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\int_\infty^{a_0} \vec{E}\cdot\text{d}\vec{l} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \int_\infty^{a_0} \frac{\text{d} r}{r^2} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This may then be solved:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\biggr{(}\frac{1}{r}\biggr{|}_\infty^{a_0} = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
to compute the potential energy, we now multiply by the charge of the electron: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, giving &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -\frac{e^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Depending on what physics or chemistry courses you may have taken before, this may be recognizable as twice the ionization energy of the n=1 orbital. The factor of two is due to the fact that in the Bohr model, the kinetic energy will be exactly half of this potential energy, and will be positive so that the net result is still negative, but with half the magnitude. This understanding of the hydrogen atom gets certain values right, but the reality of the situation is far more complicated. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is this topic connected to something that you are interested in?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am interested in robotic systems and building circuit boards and electrical systems for manufacturing robots. While studying this section in the book, I was able to connect back many of the concepts and calculations back to robotics and the electrical component of automated systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Since high school, I never really understood how to work with the voltmeter and what it measured, and I have always wanted to know, but although this particular wiki page did not go into the details and other branches of electric potential, it led me to find the answers to something I was interested in since high school, the concept of electric potential.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I think electively is really interesting. When I was younger, I participated in this demo where a group of people hold hands and someone touches this special ball full of charge. We all could feel the tingling sensation of the current passing through us. It’s cool to learn the theory behind the supposed magic that occurs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I think it&#039;s very interesting that electric potential can be seen as a property of a space and that we can have further applications using this property.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is it connected to your major?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am a Mechanical Engineering major, so I will be dealing with the electrical components of machines when I work. Therefore, I have to know these certain concepts such as electric potential in order to fully understand how they work and interact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revistionist] As a biochemistry major, electric potential and electric potential difference is not particularly related to my major, but in chemistry classes, we use electrostatic potential maps (electrostatic potential energy maps) that shows the charge distributions throughout a molecule. Although the main use in electric potential is different in physics and biochemistry (where physicists use it identify the effect of the electric field at a location), I still found it interesting as the concept of electric potential (buildup) was being used in quite a different way. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I am a computer science major. Although I deal mostly with software, the hardware aspect is still important. The algorithms that I design run differently on different machines. The time complexity of an algorithm is sometimes useless when worrying about constant factors that are determined by a system’s hardware. Quicksort, for instance, is usually faster than many other sorts that have lower time complexities. The hardware of computers heavily relies on electricity and current (which is induced by a potential difference) to switch transistors on and off and thereby process information. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I am an aerospace engineering major, and I think understanding such concepts will help me have a better holistic understanding towards fields and systems. In addition, the thinking behind solving related problems will help me better prepared for future classes that involve with solving dynamics problems. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Is there an interesting industrial application?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] Electrical potential is used to find the voltage across a path. This is useful when working with circuit components and attempting to manipulate the power output or current throughout a component.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Electric potential sensors are being used to detect a variety of electrical signals made by the human body, thus contributing to the field of electrophysiology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] The study of electric potential has lead scientists to generate very safe wires that will not overheat and cause fires. Connecting circuits to ground is important and the third prong in an electrical outlet is this ground connection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The idea of electric potential, in a way, started with Ben Franklin and his experiments in the 1740s. He began to understand the flow of electricity, which eventually paved the path towards explaining electric potential and potential difference. Scientists finally began to understand how electric fields were actually affecting the charges and the surrounding environment. Benjamin Franklin first shocked himself in 1746, while conducting experiments on electricity with found objects from around his house. Six years later, or 261 years ago for us, the founding father flew a kite attached to a key and a silk ribbon in a thunderstorm and effectively trapped lightning in a jar. The experiment is now seen as a watershed moment in mankind&#039;s venture to channel a force of nature that was viewed quite abstractly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the time Franklin started experimenting with electricity, he&#039;d already found fame and fortune as the author of Poor Richard&#039;s Almanack. Electricity wasn&#039;t a very well understood phenomenon at that point, so Franklin&#039;s research proved to be fairly foundational. The early experiments, experts believe, were inspired by other scientists&#039; work and the shortcomings therein.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ep135.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
source: http://www.benjamin-franklin-history.org/kite-experiment/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That early brush with the dangers of electricity left an impression on Franklin. He described the sensation as &amp;quot;a universal blow throughout my whole body from head to foot, which seemed within as well as without; after which the first thing I took notice of was a violent quick shaking of my body.&amp;quot; However, it didn&#039;t scare him away. In the handful of years before his famous kite experiment, Franklin contributed everything from designing the first battery designs to establishing some common nomenclature in the study of electricity. Although Franklin is often coined the father of electricity, after he set the foundations of electricity, many other scientists contributed his or her research in the advancement of electricity and eventually led to the discovery of electric potential and potential difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like mentioned multiple times throughout the page, although electric potential is a huge and important topic, it has many branches, which makes the concept of electric potential difficult to stand alone. Even with this page, to support the concept of electric potential, many crucial branches of the topic appeared, like potential difference (which also branched into [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_Path_Independence,_claimed_by_Aditya_Mohile Potential Difference Path Independence]], [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_in_a_Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Uniform Field]], and [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_of_Point_Charge_in_a_Non-Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Nonuniform Field]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External Links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] https://www.khanacademy.org/test-prep/mcat/physical-processes/electrostatics-1/v/electric-potential-at-a-point-in-space&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pcWz4tP_zUw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vpa_uApmNoo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] https://www.khanacademy.org/science/electrical-engineering/ee-electrostatics/ee-fields-potential-voltage/a/ee-electric-potential-voltage&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] &amp;quot;Benjamin Franklin and Electricity.&amp;quot; Benjamin Franklin and Electricity. N.p., n.d. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.americaslibrary.gov/aa/franklinb/aa_franklinb_electric_1.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Bottyan, Thomas. &amp;quot;Electrostatic Potential Maps.&amp;quot; Chemwiki. N.p., 02 Oct. 2013. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://chemwiki.ucdavis.edu/Core/Theoretical_Chemistry/Chemical_Bonding/General_Principles_of_Chemical_Bonding/Electrostatic_Potential_maps&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] &amp;quot;Electric Potential Difference.&amp;quot; Electric Potential Difference. The Physics Classroom, n.d. Web. 14 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/circuits/Lesson-1/Electric-Potential-Difference&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] Harland, C. J., T. D. Clark, and R. J. Prance. &amp;quot;Applications of Electric Potential (Displacement Current) Sensors in Human Body Electrophysiology.&amp;quot; International Society for Industrial Process Tomography, n.d. Web. 16 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.isipt.org/world-congress/3/269.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] Sherwood, Bruce A. &amp;quot;2.1 The Momentum Principle.&amp;quot; Matter &amp;amp; Interactions. By Ruth W. Chabay. 4th ed. Vol. 1. N.p.: John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons, 2015. 45-50. Print. Modern Mechanics.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurence12799</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=38626</id>
		<title>Electric Potential</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=38626"/>
		<updated>2020-03-24T20:40:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurence12799: /* A Mathematical Model */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039;, like all forms of potential energy, is the potential for work to be done, in this case by the electric force. The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; (frequently referred to as voltage, from its SI unit, the Volt) is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; associated with the test charge (1 Coulomb), such that it depends only on the source, just as the electric field is related to the electric force, but depends only on the source. One may similarly remember the parallel concept of the gravitational potential, which was gravitational potential energy divided by mass.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined with respect to the [[Electric Force]] &amp;amp; [[Electric Field]]:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} = - q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; from point b to point a&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the charge in the electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the source charge&#039;s electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a differential length along the path from point b to point a&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Derivation&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricPotentialPaths.png|400px|right|thumb|Some sets of electrically equivalent paths for a charge.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From this, the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; per test charge in the source charge&#039;s electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{U_{ab}}{q} = - \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The electric field is a &#039;&#039;conservative vector field&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:::This means that any path used in the above line integral will give the same value for the same beginning and end points (b and a). Looking at the figure to the right, many paths for a charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; subject to the electric field of source charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are shown. In each set of four paths (Green, Blue, Yellow, and Pink), the same amount of &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is gained or lost. &lt;br /&gt;
*A special case shown in dark green near the bottom right of the figure also exists:&lt;br /&gt;
:::If a charge is moving along a path that is always perpendicular to the electric field, the line integral will evaluate to zero, and therefore the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; will also evaluate to zero.&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is easily shown with the dot product; if two variable vectors are always perpendicular, then their dot product is always zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricPotentialRadial.png|400px|right|thumb|Illustration of radial potential.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; between two point charges &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(Q \ \text{and} \ q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be written in a simpler expression:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr ( \frac{1}{r_{a}} - \frac{1}{r_{b}} \biggr )&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the charge in the source&#039;s electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{a}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the final position &lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{b}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the initial position&lt;br /&gt;
:*The initial position is often taken to be infinity (the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined to be zero at infinity) creating a simpler and more familiar looking equation:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} r}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
:::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the distance between the source charge and the charge in the electric field&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is used to described the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; gained or lost when moving a charge radially closer to a source charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
===Externals links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Main Idea ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electric potential energy, like all forms of potential energy, is the potential for work to be done, in this case by the electric force. The electric potential (frequently referred to as voltage, from its SI unit the Volt) is the electric potential energy associated with the test charge, such that it depends only on the source, just as the electric field is related to the electric force, but depends only on the source. One may similarly remember the parallel concept of the gravitational potential, which was gravitational potential energy divided by mass.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
====Electric Potential Energy====&lt;br /&gt;
Electric potential energy may be calculated in a variety of manners, depending upon the situation. The electric potential energy between two point charges may be written in a form which follows directly from the definition of the Coulomb force:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = \frac{qQ}{4\pi\epsilon_0 r_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is the amount of energy which would be required to bring one of the charged objects (by convention the small &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; q &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; charge) from an infinite distance to its current position, where, by convention, the potential energy at infinity is equal to zero. This may, therefore, be derived from the equation for work:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Derivation with Calculus=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -W = -\int_\infty^{r_0} \vec{F}_E(r) \cdot \text{d} \vec{r} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -\int_\infty^{r_0} \frac{qQ \hat{r}}{4\pi\epsilon_0 r^2} \cdot \text{d} \vec{r} = -\frac{qQ}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\int_\infty^{r_0} \frac{\hat{r} \cdot \hat{r}}{r^2} \text{d} r &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = \frac{qQ}{4\pi \epsilon_0} \biggr{(} \frac{1}{r} \biggr{|}_{\infty}^{r_0} = \frac{qQ}{4\pi \epsilon_0 r_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Given our definition of the [[Electric Field]], we have that &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vec{F}_E(r) = q\vec{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
so the electric potential energy may be generally written as &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -q\int_a^b \vec{E} \cdot \text{d} \vec{r} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Linear assumption=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the above equation, one can see that if the electric field is constant over the length of the path, then electric potential energy may be written in a simplified manner as&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = q\vec{E}\cdot\Delta \vec{s} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Electric Potential====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just as we divided by charge to go from electric force to electric field, dividing by charge takes us from the electric potential energy to the electric potential. For a test particle of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; q &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we define &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; V = \frac{U}{q} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Derivation with Calculus=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is not especially meaningful without choosing a reference point, just as for potential energy. Thus, one may speak of the potential difference between two points, which is independent of the reference value. From the above definition of electric potential energy, it is possible to derive an expression for the potential difference between two points from the electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\int_a^b \vec{E} \cdot \text{d} \vec{s} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The vectors are used to express the path associated with this integral. The difference in electric potential will be the same no matter what path one takes, as explored in [[Path Independence of Electric Potential]]. This also allows one to write the inverse relationship, determining the electric field at a given point from the electric potential in one and three dimensions respectively:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; E = -\frac{\text{d}V}{\text{d}x}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vec{E} = -\nabla V &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \nabla &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the gradient operator.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Linear Assumption=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The above equations allow us to write the equivalent expressions under an assumption of constant values for the electric field, such that the integral reduces to &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\vec{E} \cdot \Delta \vec{l} = -(E_x \Delta x + E_y \Delta y + E_z \Delta z)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This also leads directly to the inverse expression:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vec{E} = -(\frac{\Delta V_x}{\Delta x} + \frac{\Delta V_y}{\Delta y} + \frac{\Delta V_z}{\Delta z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric potential difference in a field which is nonuniform, but whose variations are discrete, is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\sum \vec{E}\cdot \Delta\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The different parts in this particular equation resembles the equation for the potential difference in an uniform field, except that with the nonuniform field, the potential difference in the different fields are summed up. This situation can be quite easy, but when the system gets difficult, first, choose a path and divide it into smaller pieces of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;; second, write an expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -\vec{E}\cdot\Delta\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of one piece; third, add up the contributions of all the pieces; last, check the result to make sure the magnitude, direction, and units make sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is important to keep track of the sign differences. If the path follows the direction of the electric field, the sign of the potential difference will be negative. This may be imagined as dropping a positive test charge in an electric field: a positive charge will be accelerated in the direction of the field, meaning that it is gaining energy, and so its potential must be decreasing. By contrast, if the path is opposite the direction of the field, potential will be increasing, much like rolling a boulder up a hill. If the path is perpendicular to the direction of the electric field, the dot product will be equal to zero. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, when working with different situations, it is nice to keep in mind that in a conductor, the electric field is zero. Therefore, the potential difference is zero as well. In an insulator, the electric field is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{E_{applied}}{K}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the dielectric constant. Furthermore, the potential difference over a round trip is equal to zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
Click on the link to see Electric Potential through VPython!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Make sure to press &amp;quot;Run&amp;quot; to see the principle in action!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://trinket.io/embed/glowscript/0a7e486c94 Teach hand-on with GlowScript]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Watch this video for a more visual approach! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Rb9guSEeVE Electric Potential: Visualizing Voltage with 3D animations]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--== Models ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric potential of a particle at a point is equal to the potential difference of that particle with respect to infinity. Since we know how to calculate the potential difference using the formula, we can see that this implies that the electric potential at infinity is equal to zero. What does this mean? This means that a particle that is extremely far away has no potential energy. This makes sense, because a proton will not be affected by the electric field of another proton at a distance of infinity apart. This subtle detail aids in solving a case of problems types later on.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although electric potential is an important topic to learn, most problems encountered will not ask to find just the &amp;quot;electric potential,&amp;quot; instead, questions will most likely ask for the &amp;quot;electric potential difference.&amp;quot; This is because electric potential is measured using different locations, or more specifically pathways between the different locations, so instead of determining the electric potential of location A and the electric potential of final location B, it would make more sense to determine the &amp;quot;difference in electric potential between locations A and B.&amp;quot; The following mathematical model will further explain this. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like mentioned before, instead of electric potential, in most cases, electric potential difference is needed to be found. The general equation for the potential difference is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{{U}_{electric}} = {q} * ∆{V} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{{U}_{electric}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric potential energy, which is measured in Joules (J). &#039;&#039;&#039;q&#039;&#039;&#039; is the charge of the particle moving through the path of the electric potential difference, which is measured in coulombs (C). &#039;&#039;&#039;∆V&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric potential difference, which is measured in Joules per Coulomb (J/C), or just Volts (V).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Aside from the general equation, the electric potential difference can also be found in other ways. The potential difference in an &#039;&#039;&#039;uniform field&#039;&#039;&#039; is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{V} = -({E}_{x}∆{x} + {E}_{y}∆{y} + {E}_{z}∆{z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;, which can also be written as &#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{V} = -\vec{E}·∆\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the electric potential difference, which is measured in Joules per Coulomb (J/C), or just Volts (V). &#039;&#039;&#039;E&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric field, which is measured in Newtons per Coulomb (N/C), and it is important to note that the different direction components of the electric field are used in the equation. &#039;&#039;&#039;l&#039;&#039;&#039; (or the &#039;&#039;&#039;x&#039;&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;&#039;y&#039;&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;&#039;z&#039;&#039;&#039;) is the distance between the two described locations, which is measured in meters, and x, y, and z, are the different components of the difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, when working with different situations, it is nice to keep in mind that in a conductor, the electric field is zero. Therefore, the potential difference is zero as well. In an insulator, the electric field is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;{E}_{applied} / K&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; where &#039;&#039;&#039;K&#039;&#039;&#039; is the dielectric constant. Also, the round trip potential difference is always zero, or in other words, if you start from a certain point and end at the same point, then, the potential difference will be zero. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
In a capacitor, the negative charges are located on the left plate, and the positive charges are located on the right plate. Location A is at the left end of the capacitor, and Location B is at the right end of the capacitor, or in other words, Location A and B are only different in terms of their x component location. The path moves from A to B. What is the direction of the electric field? Is the potential difference positive or negative? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ep125.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer: The electric field is to the left. The potential difference is increasing, or is positive.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
The electric field always moves away from the positive charge and towards the negative charge, which means the electric field in this example is to the left. Because the direction and the electric field and the direction of the path are opposite, the potential difference is increasing, or is positive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Calculate the change in electric potential between point A, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(-4, 3,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and B, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(2,-2,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; . The electric field in the location is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; (50,0,0) \; N/C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:EP mid fig.png ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer: -300V&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta\vec{l}= (2,-2,0)\;m - (-4,3,0)\;m = (6,-5,0)\;m &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -({E}_{x}∆{x} + {E}_{y}∆{y} + {E}_{z}∆{z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -(50\; N/C \cdot 6 \;m + 0 \; N/c \cdot -5 \; m + 0\cdot 0)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -300 V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Bohr Model]] of the hydrogen atom treats it as a nucleus of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; +e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; electrons of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; orbiting in circular orbits of specific radii. Calculate the potential difference between two points, one infinitely far away from the nucleus, and the other one Bohr radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; away from the nucleus (don&#039;t worry about substituting in the values). Compute the electric potential energy associated with the electron one Bohr radius away from the nucleus, setting the potential energy at infinity as zero (remember the sign of the charge). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We may compute the electric potential by taking integrating the electric field of a point charge as the radius goes from infinity to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. This integral may be set up as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\int_\infty^{a_0} \vec{E}\cdot\text{d}\vec{l} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \int_\infty^{a_0} \frac{\text{d} r}{r^2} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This may then be solved:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\biggr{(}\frac{1}{r}\biggr{|}_\infty^{a_0} = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
to compute the potential energy, we now multiply by the charge of the electron: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, giving &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -\frac{e^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Depending on what physics or chemistry courses you may have taken before, this may be recognizable as twice the ionization energy of the n=1 orbital. The factor of two is due to the fact that in the Bohr model, the kinetic energy will be exactly half of this potential energy, and will be positive so that the net result is still negative, but with half the magnitude. This understanding of the hydrogen atom gets certain values right, but the reality of the situation is far more complicated. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is this topic connected to something that you are interested in?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am interested in robotic systems and building circuit boards and electrical systems for manufacturing robots. While studying this section in the book, I was able to connect back many of the concepts and calculations back to robotics and the electrical component of automated systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Since high school, I never really understood how to work with the voltmeter and what it measured, and I have always wanted to know, but although this particular wiki page did not go into the details and other branches of electric potential, it led me to find the answers to something I was interested in since high school, the concept of electric potential.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I think electively is really interesting. When I was younger, I participated in this demo where a group of people hold hands and someone touches this special ball full of charge. We all could feel the tingling sensation of the current passing through us. It’s cool to learn the theory behind the supposed magic that occurs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I think it&#039;s very interesting that electric potential can be seen as a property of a space and that we can have further applications using this property.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is it connected to your major?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am a Mechanical Engineering major, so I will be dealing with the electrical components of machines when I work. Therefore, I have to know these certain concepts such as electric potential in order to fully understand how they work and interact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revistionist] As a biochemistry major, electric potential and electric potential difference is not particularly related to my major, but in chemistry classes, we use electrostatic potential maps (electrostatic potential energy maps) that shows the charge distributions throughout a molecule. Although the main use in electric potential is different in physics and biochemistry (where physicists use it identify the effect of the electric field at a location), I still found it interesting as the concept of electric potential (buildup) was being used in quite a different way. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I am a computer science major. Although I deal mostly with software, the hardware aspect is still important. The algorithms that I design run differently on different machines. The time complexity of an algorithm is sometimes useless when worrying about constant factors that are determined by a system’s hardware. Quicksort, for instance, is usually faster than many other sorts that have lower time complexities. The hardware of computers heavily relies on electricity and current (which is induced by a potential difference) to switch transistors on and off and thereby process information. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I am an aerospace engineering major, and I think understanding such concepts will help me have a better holistic understanding towards fields and systems. In addition, the thinking behind solving related problems will help me better prepared for future classes that involve with solving dynamics problems. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Is there an interesting industrial application?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] Electrical potential is used to find the voltage across a path. This is useful when working with circuit components and attempting to manipulate the power output or current throughout a component.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Electric potential sensors are being used to detect a variety of electrical signals made by the human body, thus contributing to the field of electrophysiology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] The study of electric potential has lead scientists to generate very safe wires that will not overheat and cause fires. Connecting circuits to ground is important and the third prong in an electrical outlet is this ground connection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The idea of electric potential, in a way, started with Ben Franklin and his experiments in the 1740s. He began to understand the flow of electricity, which eventually paved the path towards explaining electric potential and potential difference. Scientists finally began to understand how electric fields were actually affecting the charges and the surrounding environment. Benjamin Franklin first shocked himself in 1746, while conducting experiments on electricity with found objects from around his house. Six years later, or 261 years ago for us, the founding father flew a kite attached to a key and a silk ribbon in a thunderstorm and effectively trapped lightning in a jar. The experiment is now seen as a watershed moment in mankind&#039;s venture to channel a force of nature that was viewed quite abstractly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the time Franklin started experimenting with electricity, he&#039;d already found fame and fortune as the author of Poor Richard&#039;s Almanack. Electricity wasn&#039;t a very well understood phenomenon at that point, so Franklin&#039;s research proved to be fairly foundational. The early experiments, experts believe, were inspired by other scientists&#039; work and the shortcomings therein.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ep135.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
source: http://www.benjamin-franklin-history.org/kite-experiment/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That early brush with the dangers of electricity left an impression on Franklin. He described the sensation as &amp;quot;a universal blow throughout my whole body from head to foot, which seemed within as well as without; after which the first thing I took notice of was a violent quick shaking of my body.&amp;quot; However, it didn&#039;t scare him away. In the handful of years before his famous kite experiment, Franklin contributed everything from designing the first battery designs to establishing some common nomenclature in the study of electricity. Although Franklin is often coined the father of electricity, after he set the foundations of electricity, many other scientists contributed his or her research in the advancement of electricity and eventually led to the discovery of electric potential and potential difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like mentioned multiple times throughout the page, although electric potential is a huge and important topic, it has many branches, which makes the concept of electric potential difficult to stand alone. Even with this page, to support the concept of electric potential, many crucial branches of the topic appeared, like potential difference (which also branched into [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_Path_Independence,_claimed_by_Aditya_Mohile Potential Difference Path Independence]], [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_in_a_Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Uniform Field]], and [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_of_Point_Charge_in_a_Non-Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Nonuniform Field]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External Links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] https://www.khanacademy.org/test-prep/mcat/physical-processes/electrostatics-1/v/electric-potential-at-a-point-in-space&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pcWz4tP_zUw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vpa_uApmNoo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] https://www.khanacademy.org/science/electrical-engineering/ee-electrostatics/ee-fields-potential-voltage/a/ee-electric-potential-voltage&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] &amp;quot;Benjamin Franklin and Electricity.&amp;quot; Benjamin Franklin and Electricity. N.p., n.d. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.americaslibrary.gov/aa/franklinb/aa_franklinb_electric_1.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Bottyan, Thomas. &amp;quot;Electrostatic Potential Maps.&amp;quot; Chemwiki. N.p., 02 Oct. 2013. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://chemwiki.ucdavis.edu/Core/Theoretical_Chemistry/Chemical_Bonding/General_Principles_of_Chemical_Bonding/Electrostatic_Potential_maps&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] &amp;quot;Electric Potential Difference.&amp;quot; Electric Potential Difference. The Physics Classroom, n.d. Web. 14 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/circuits/Lesson-1/Electric-Potential-Difference&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] Harland, C. J., T. D. Clark, and R. J. Prance. &amp;quot;Applications of Electric Potential (Displacement Current) Sensors in Human Body Electrophysiology.&amp;quot; International Society for Industrial Process Tomography, n.d. Web. 16 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.isipt.org/world-congress/3/269.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] Sherwood, Bruce A. &amp;quot;2.1 The Momentum Principle.&amp;quot; Matter &amp;amp; Interactions. By Ruth W. Chabay. 4th ed. Vol. 1. N.p.: John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons, 2015. 45-50. Print. Modern Mechanics.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurence12799</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=38625</id>
		<title>Electric Potential</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=38625"/>
		<updated>2020-03-24T20:39:34Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurence12799: /* A Mathematical Model */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039;, like all forms of potential energy, is the potential for work to be done, in this case by the electric force. The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; (frequently referred to as voltage, from its SI unit, the Volt) is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; associated with the test charge (1 Coulomb), such that it depends only on the source, just as the electric field is related to the electric force, but depends only on the source. One may similarly remember the parallel concept of the gravitational potential, which was gravitational potential energy divided by mass.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined with respect to the [[Electric Force]] &amp;amp; [[Electric Field]]:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} = - q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; from point b to point a&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the charge in the electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the source charge&#039;s electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a differential length along the path from point b to point a&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricPotentialPaths.png|400px|right|thumb|Some sets of electrically equivalent paths for a charge.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From this, the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; per test charge in the source charge&#039;s electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{U_{ab}}{q} = - \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The electric field is a &#039;&#039;conservative vector field&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:::This means that any path used in the above line integral will give the same value for the same beginning and end points (b and a). Looking at the figure to the right, many paths for a charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; subject to the electric field of source charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are shown. In each set of four paths (Green, Blue, Yellow, and Pink), the same amount of &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is gained or lost. &lt;br /&gt;
*A special case shown in dark green near the bottom right of the figure also exists:&lt;br /&gt;
:::If a charge is moving along a path that is always perpendicular to the electric field, the line integral will evaluate to zero, and therefore the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; will also evaluate to zero.&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is easily shown with the dot product; if two variable vectors are always perpendicular, then their dot product is always zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricPotentialRadial.png|400px|right|thumb|Illustration of radial potential.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; between two point charges &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(Q \ \text{and} \ q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be written in a simpler expression:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr ( \frac{1}{r_{a}} - \frac{1}{r_{b}} \biggr )&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the charge in the source&#039;s electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{a}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the final position &lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{b}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the initial position&lt;br /&gt;
:*The initial position is often taken to be infinity (the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined to be zero at infinity) creating a simpler and more familiar looking equation:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} r}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
:::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the distance between the source charge and the charge in the electric field&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is used to described the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; gained or lost when moving a charge radially closer to a source charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
===Externals links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Main Idea ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electric potential energy, like all forms of potential energy, is the potential for work to be done, in this case by the electric force. The electric potential (frequently referred to as voltage, from its SI unit the Volt) is the electric potential energy associated with the test charge, such that it depends only on the source, just as the electric field is related to the electric force, but depends only on the source. One may similarly remember the parallel concept of the gravitational potential, which was gravitational potential energy divided by mass.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
====Electric Potential Energy====&lt;br /&gt;
Electric potential energy may be calculated in a variety of manners, depending upon the situation. The electric potential energy between two point charges may be written in a form which follows directly from the definition of the Coulomb force:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = \frac{qQ}{4\pi\epsilon_0 r_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is the amount of energy which would be required to bring one of the charged objects (by convention the small &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; q &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; charge) from an infinite distance to its current position, where, by convention, the potential energy at infinity is equal to zero. This may, therefore, be derived from the equation for work:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Derivation with Calculus=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -W = -\int_\infty^{r_0} \vec{F}_E(r) \cdot \text{d} \vec{r} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -\int_\infty^{r_0} \frac{qQ \hat{r}}{4\pi\epsilon_0 r^2} \cdot \text{d} \vec{r} = -\frac{qQ}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\int_\infty^{r_0} \frac{\hat{r} \cdot \hat{r}}{r^2} \text{d} r &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = \frac{qQ}{4\pi \epsilon_0} \biggr{(} \frac{1}{r} \biggr{|}_{\infty}^{r_0} = \frac{qQ}{4\pi \epsilon_0 r_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Given our definition of the [[Electric Field]], we have that &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vec{F}_E(r) = q\vec{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
so the electric potential energy may be generally written as &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -q\int_a^b \vec{E} \cdot \text{d} \vec{r} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Linear assumption=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the above equation, one can see that if the electric field is constant over the length of the path, then electric potential energy may be written in a simplified manner as&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = q\vec{E}\cdot\Delta \vec{s} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Electric Potential====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just as we divided by charge to go from electric force to electric field, dividing by charge takes us from the electric potential energy to the electric potential. For a test particle of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; q &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we define &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; V = \frac{U}{q} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Derivation with Calculus=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is not especially meaningful without choosing a reference point, just as for potential energy. Thus, one may speak of the potential difference between two points, which is independent of the reference value. From the above definition of electric potential energy, it is possible to derive an expression for the potential difference between two points from the electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\int_a^b \vec{E} \cdot \text{d} \vec{s} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The vectors are used to express the path associated with this integral. The difference in electric potential will be the same no matter what path one takes, as explored in [[Path Independence of Electric Potential]]. This also allows one to write the inverse relationship, determining the electric field at a given point from the electric potential in one and three dimensions respectively:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; E = -\frac{\text{d}V}{\text{d}x}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vec{E} = -\nabla V &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \nabla &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the gradient operator.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Linear Assumption=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The above equations allow us to write the equivalent expressions under an assumption of constant values for the electric field, such that the integral reduces to &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\vec{E} \cdot \Delta \vec{l} = -(E_x \Delta x + E_y \Delta y + E_z \Delta z)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This also leads directly to the inverse expression:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vec{E} = -(\frac{\Delta V_x}{\Delta x} + \frac{\Delta V_y}{\Delta y} + \frac{\Delta V_z}{\Delta z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric potential difference in a field which is nonuniform, but whose variations are discrete, is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\sum \vec{E}\cdot \Delta\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The different parts in this particular equation resembles the equation for the potential difference in an uniform field, except that with the nonuniform field, the potential difference in the different fields are summed up. This situation can be quite easy, but when the system gets difficult, first, choose a path and divide it into smaller pieces of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;; second, write an expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -\vec{E}\cdot\Delta\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of one piece; third, add up the contributions of all the pieces; last, check the result to make sure the magnitude, direction, and units make sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is important to keep track of the sign differences. If the path follows the direction of the electric field, the sign of the potential difference will be negative. This may be imagined as dropping a positive test charge in an electric field: a positive charge will be accelerated in the direction of the field, meaning that it is gaining energy, and so its potential must be decreasing. By contrast, if the path is opposite the direction of the field, potential will be increasing, much like rolling a boulder up a hill. If the path is perpendicular to the direction of the electric field, the dot product will be equal to zero. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, when working with different situations, it is nice to keep in mind that in a conductor, the electric field is zero. Therefore, the potential difference is zero as well. In an insulator, the electric field is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{E_{applied}}{K}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the dielectric constant. Furthermore, the potential difference over a round trip is equal to zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
Click on the link to see Electric Potential through VPython!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Make sure to press &amp;quot;Run&amp;quot; to see the principle in action!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://trinket.io/embed/glowscript/0a7e486c94 Teach hand-on with GlowScript]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Watch this video for a more visual approach! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Rb9guSEeVE Electric Potential: Visualizing Voltage with 3D animations]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--== Models ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric potential of a particle at a point is equal to the potential difference of that particle with respect to infinity. Since we know how to calculate the potential difference using the formula, we can see that this implies that the electric potential at infinity is equal to zero. What does this mean? This means that a particle that is extremely far away has no potential energy. This makes sense, because a proton will not be affected by the electric field of another proton at a distance of infinity apart. This subtle detail aids in solving a case of problems types later on.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although electric potential is an important topic to learn, most problems encountered will not ask to find just the &amp;quot;electric potential,&amp;quot; instead, questions will most likely ask for the &amp;quot;electric potential difference.&amp;quot; This is because electric potential is measured using different locations, or more specifically pathways between the different locations, so instead of determining the electric potential of location A and the electric potential of final location B, it would make more sense to determine the &amp;quot;difference in electric potential between locations A and B.&amp;quot; The following mathematical model will further explain this. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like mentioned before, instead of electric potential, in most cases, electric potential difference is needed to be found. The general equation for the potential difference is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{{U}_{electric}} = {q} * ∆{V} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{{U}_{electric}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric potential energy, which is measured in Joules (J). &#039;&#039;&#039;q&#039;&#039;&#039; is the charge of the particle moving through the path of the electric potential difference, which is measured in coulombs (C). &#039;&#039;&#039;∆V&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric potential difference, which is measured in Joules per Coulomb (J/C), or just Volts (V).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Aside from the general equation, the electric potential difference can also be found in other ways. The potential difference in an &#039;&#039;&#039;uniform field&#039;&#039;&#039; is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{V} = -({E}_{x}∆{x} + {E}_{y}∆{y} + {E}_{z}∆{z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;, which can also be written as &#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{V} = -\vec{E}·∆\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the electric potential difference, which is measured in Joules per Coulomb (J/C), or just Volts (V). &#039;&#039;&#039;E&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric field, which is measured in Newtons per Coulomb (N/C), and it is important to note that the different direction components of the electric field are used in the equation. &#039;&#039;&#039;l&#039;&#039;&#039; (or the &#039;&#039;&#039;x&#039;&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;&#039;y&#039;&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;&#039;z&#039;&#039;&#039;) is the distance between the two described locations, which is measured in meters, and x, y, and z, are the different components of the difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, when working with different situations, it is nice to keep in mind that in a conductor, the electric field is zero. Therefore, the potential difference is zero as well. In an insulator, the electric field is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;{E}_{applied} / K&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; where &#039;&#039;&#039;K&#039;&#039;&#039; is the dielectric constant. Also, the round trip potential difference is always zero, or in other words, if you start from a certain point and end at the same point, then, the potential difference will be zero. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
In a capacitor, the negative charges are located on the left plate, and the positive charges are located on the right plate. Location A is at the left end of the capacitor, and Location B is at the right end of the capacitor, or in other words, Location A and B are only different in terms of their x component location. The path moves from A to B. What is the direction of the electric field? Is the potential difference positive or negative? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ep125.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer: The electric field is to the left. The potential difference is increasing, or is positive.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
The electric field always moves away from the positive charge and towards the negative charge, which means the electric field in this example is to the left. Because the direction and the electric field and the direction of the path are opposite, the potential difference is increasing, or is positive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Calculate the change in electric potential between point A, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(-4, 3,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and B, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(2,-2,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; . The electric field in the location is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; (50,0,0) \; N/C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:EP mid fig.png ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer: -300V&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta\vec{l}= (2,-2,0)\;m - (-4,3,0)\;m = (6,-5,0)\;m &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -({E}_{x}∆{x} + {E}_{y}∆{y} + {E}_{z}∆{z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -(50\; N/C \cdot 6 \;m + 0 \; N/c \cdot -5 \; m + 0\cdot 0)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -300 V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Bohr Model]] of the hydrogen atom treats it as a nucleus of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; +e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; electrons of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; orbiting in circular orbits of specific radii. Calculate the potential difference between two points, one infinitely far away from the nucleus, and the other one Bohr radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; away from the nucleus (don&#039;t worry about substituting in the values). Compute the electric potential energy associated with the electron one Bohr radius away from the nucleus, setting the potential energy at infinity as zero (remember the sign of the charge). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We may compute the electric potential by taking integrating the electric field of a point charge as the radius goes from infinity to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. This integral may be set up as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\int_\infty^{a_0} \vec{E}\cdot\text{d}\vec{l} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \int_\infty^{a_0} \frac{\text{d} r}{r^2} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This may then be solved:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\biggr{(}\frac{1}{r}\biggr{|}_\infty^{a_0} = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
to compute the potential energy, we now multiply by the charge of the electron: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, giving &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -\frac{e^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Depending on what physics or chemistry courses you may have taken before, this may be recognizable as twice the ionization energy of the n=1 orbital. The factor of two is due to the fact that in the Bohr model, the kinetic energy will be exactly half of this potential energy, and will be positive so that the net result is still negative, but with half the magnitude. This understanding of the hydrogen atom gets certain values right, but the reality of the situation is far more complicated. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is this topic connected to something that you are interested in?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am interested in robotic systems and building circuit boards and electrical systems for manufacturing robots. While studying this section in the book, I was able to connect back many of the concepts and calculations back to robotics and the electrical component of automated systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Since high school, I never really understood how to work with the voltmeter and what it measured, and I have always wanted to know, but although this particular wiki page did not go into the details and other branches of electric potential, it led me to find the answers to something I was interested in since high school, the concept of electric potential.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I think electively is really interesting. When I was younger, I participated in this demo where a group of people hold hands and someone touches this special ball full of charge. We all could feel the tingling sensation of the current passing through us. It’s cool to learn the theory behind the supposed magic that occurs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I think it&#039;s very interesting that electric potential can be seen as a property of a space and that we can have further applications using this property.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is it connected to your major?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am a Mechanical Engineering major, so I will be dealing with the electrical components of machines when I work. Therefore, I have to know these certain concepts such as electric potential in order to fully understand how they work and interact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revistionist] As a biochemistry major, electric potential and electric potential difference is not particularly related to my major, but in chemistry classes, we use electrostatic potential maps (electrostatic potential energy maps) that shows the charge distributions throughout a molecule. Although the main use in electric potential is different in physics and biochemistry (where physicists use it identify the effect of the electric field at a location), I still found it interesting as the concept of electric potential (buildup) was being used in quite a different way. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I am a computer science major. Although I deal mostly with software, the hardware aspect is still important. The algorithms that I design run differently on different machines. The time complexity of an algorithm is sometimes useless when worrying about constant factors that are determined by a system’s hardware. Quicksort, for instance, is usually faster than many other sorts that have lower time complexities. The hardware of computers heavily relies on electricity and current (which is induced by a potential difference) to switch transistors on and off and thereby process information. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I am an aerospace engineering major, and I think understanding such concepts will help me have a better holistic understanding towards fields and systems. In addition, the thinking behind solving related problems will help me better prepared for future classes that involve with solving dynamics problems. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Is there an interesting industrial application?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] Electrical potential is used to find the voltage across a path. This is useful when working with circuit components and attempting to manipulate the power output or current throughout a component.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Electric potential sensors are being used to detect a variety of electrical signals made by the human body, thus contributing to the field of electrophysiology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] The study of electric potential has lead scientists to generate very safe wires that will not overheat and cause fires. Connecting circuits to ground is important and the third prong in an electrical outlet is this ground connection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The idea of electric potential, in a way, started with Ben Franklin and his experiments in the 1740s. He began to understand the flow of electricity, which eventually paved the path towards explaining electric potential and potential difference. Scientists finally began to understand how electric fields were actually affecting the charges and the surrounding environment. Benjamin Franklin first shocked himself in 1746, while conducting experiments on electricity with found objects from around his house. Six years later, or 261 years ago for us, the founding father flew a kite attached to a key and a silk ribbon in a thunderstorm and effectively trapped lightning in a jar. The experiment is now seen as a watershed moment in mankind&#039;s venture to channel a force of nature that was viewed quite abstractly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the time Franklin started experimenting with electricity, he&#039;d already found fame and fortune as the author of Poor Richard&#039;s Almanack. Electricity wasn&#039;t a very well understood phenomenon at that point, so Franklin&#039;s research proved to be fairly foundational. The early experiments, experts believe, were inspired by other scientists&#039; work and the shortcomings therein.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ep135.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
source: http://www.benjamin-franklin-history.org/kite-experiment/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That early brush with the dangers of electricity left an impression on Franklin. He described the sensation as &amp;quot;a universal blow throughout my whole body from head to foot, which seemed within as well as without; after which the first thing I took notice of was a violent quick shaking of my body.&amp;quot; However, it didn&#039;t scare him away. In the handful of years before his famous kite experiment, Franklin contributed everything from designing the first battery designs to establishing some common nomenclature in the study of electricity. Although Franklin is often coined the father of electricity, after he set the foundations of electricity, many other scientists contributed his or her research in the advancement of electricity and eventually led to the discovery of electric potential and potential difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like mentioned multiple times throughout the page, although electric potential is a huge and important topic, it has many branches, which makes the concept of electric potential difficult to stand alone. Even with this page, to support the concept of electric potential, many crucial branches of the topic appeared, like potential difference (which also branched into [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_Path_Independence,_claimed_by_Aditya_Mohile Potential Difference Path Independence]], [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_in_a_Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Uniform Field]], and [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_of_Point_Charge_in_a_Non-Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Nonuniform Field]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External Links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] https://www.khanacademy.org/test-prep/mcat/physical-processes/electrostatics-1/v/electric-potential-at-a-point-in-space&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pcWz4tP_zUw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vpa_uApmNoo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] https://www.khanacademy.org/science/electrical-engineering/ee-electrostatics/ee-fields-potential-voltage/a/ee-electric-potential-voltage&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] &amp;quot;Benjamin Franklin and Electricity.&amp;quot; Benjamin Franklin and Electricity. N.p., n.d. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.americaslibrary.gov/aa/franklinb/aa_franklinb_electric_1.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Bottyan, Thomas. &amp;quot;Electrostatic Potential Maps.&amp;quot; Chemwiki. N.p., 02 Oct. 2013. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://chemwiki.ucdavis.edu/Core/Theoretical_Chemistry/Chemical_Bonding/General_Principles_of_Chemical_Bonding/Electrostatic_Potential_maps&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] &amp;quot;Electric Potential Difference.&amp;quot; Electric Potential Difference. The Physics Classroom, n.d. Web. 14 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/circuits/Lesson-1/Electric-Potential-Difference&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] Harland, C. J., T. D. Clark, and R. J. Prance. &amp;quot;Applications of Electric Potential (Displacement Current) Sensors in Human Body Electrophysiology.&amp;quot; International Society for Industrial Process Tomography, n.d. Web. 16 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.isipt.org/world-congress/3/269.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] Sherwood, Bruce A. &amp;quot;2.1 The Momentum Principle.&amp;quot; Matter &amp;amp; Interactions. By Ruth W. Chabay. 4th ed. Vol. 1. N.p.: John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons, 2015. 45-50. Print. Modern Mechanics.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurence12799</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=38624</id>
		<title>Electric Potential</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=38624"/>
		<updated>2020-03-24T20:38:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurence12799: /* A Mathematical Model */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039;, like all forms of potential energy, is the potential for work to be done, in this case by the electric force. The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; (frequently referred to as voltage, from its SI unit, the Volt) is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; associated with the test charge (1 Coulomb), such that it depends only on the source, just as the electric field is related to the electric force, but depends only on the source. One may similarly remember the parallel concept of the gravitational potential, which was gravitational potential energy divided by mass.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined with respect to the [[Electric Force]] &amp;amp; [[Electric Field]]:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} = - q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; from point b to point a&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the charge in the electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the source charge&#039;s electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a differential length along the path from point b to point a&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricPotentialPaths.png|400px|right|thumb|Some sets of electrically equivalent paths for a charge.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From this, the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; per test charge in the source charge&#039;s electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{U_{ab}}{q} = - \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The electric field is a &#039;&#039;conservative vector field&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:::This means that any path used in the above line integral will give the same value for the same beginning and end points (b and a). Looking at the figure to the right, many paths for a charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; subject to the electric field of source charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are shown. In each set of four paths (Green, Blue, Yellow, and Pink), the same amount of &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is gained or lost. &lt;br /&gt;
*A special case shown in dark green near the bottom right of the figure also exists:&lt;br /&gt;
:::If a charge is moving along a path that is always perpendicular to the electric field, the line integral will evaluate to zero, and therefore the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; will also evaluate to zero.&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is easily shown with the dot product; if two variable vectors are always perpendicular, then their dot product is always zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricPotentialRadial.png|400px|right|thumb|Illustration of radial potential.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; between two point charges &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(Q \ \text{and} \ q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be written in a simpler expression:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr ( \frac{1}{r_{a}} - \frac{1}{r_{b}} \biggr )&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the charge in the source&#039;s electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{a}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the final position &lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{b}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the initial position&lt;br /&gt;
:*The initial position is often taken to be infinity (the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined to be zero at infinity) creating a simpler and more familiar looking equation:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} r}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
:::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the distance between the source charge and the charge in the electric field&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is used to described the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; gained or lost when moving a charge radially closer to a source charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
===Externals links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Main Idea ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electric potential energy, like all forms of potential energy, is the potential for work to be done, in this case by the electric force. The electric potential (frequently referred to as voltage, from its SI unit the Volt) is the electric potential energy associated with the test charge, such that it depends only on the source, just as the electric field is related to the electric force, but depends only on the source. One may similarly remember the parallel concept of the gravitational potential, which was gravitational potential energy divided by mass.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
====Electric Potential Energy====&lt;br /&gt;
Electric potential energy may be calculated in a variety of manners, depending upon the situation. The electric potential energy between two point charges may be written in a form which follows directly from the definition of the Coulomb force:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = \frac{qQ}{4\pi\epsilon_0 r_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is the amount of energy which would be required to bring one of the charged objects (by convention the small &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; q &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; charge) from an infinite distance to its current position, where, by convention, the potential energy at infinity is equal to zero. This may, therefore, be derived from the equation for work:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Derivation with Calculus=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -W = -\int_\infty^{r_0} \vec{F}_E(r) \cdot \text{d} \vec{r} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -\int_\infty^{r_0} \frac{qQ \hat{r}}{4\pi\epsilon_0 r^2} \cdot \text{d} \vec{r} = -\frac{qQ}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\int_\infty^{r_0} \frac{\hat{r} \cdot \hat{r}}{r^2} \text{d} r &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = \frac{qQ}{4\pi \epsilon_0} \biggr{(} \frac{1}{r} \biggr{|}_{\infty}^{r_0} = \frac{qQ}{4\pi \epsilon_0 r_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Given our definition of the [[Electric Field]], we have that &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vec{F}_E(r) = q\vec{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
so the electric potential energy may be generally written as &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -q\int_a^b \vec{E} \cdot \text{d} \vec{r} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Linear assumption=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the above equation, one can see that if the electric field is constant over the length of the path, then electric potential energy may be written in a simplified manner as&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = q\vec{E}\cdot\Delta \vec{s} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Electric Potential====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just as we divided by charge to go from electric force to electric field, dividing by charge takes us from the electric potential energy to the electric potential. For a test particle of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; q &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we define &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; V = \frac{U}{q} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Derivation with Calculus=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is not especially meaningful without choosing a reference point, just as for potential energy. Thus, one may speak of the potential difference between two points, which is independent of the reference value. From the above definition of electric potential energy, it is possible to derive an expression for the potential difference between two points from the electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\int_a^b \vec{E} \cdot \text{d} \vec{s} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The vectors are used to express the path associated with this integral. The difference in electric potential will be the same no matter what path one takes, as explored in [[Path Independence of Electric Potential]]. This also allows one to write the inverse relationship, determining the electric field at a given point from the electric potential in one and three dimensions respectively:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; E = -\frac{\text{d}V}{\text{d}x}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vec{E} = -\nabla V &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \nabla &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the gradient operator.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Linear Assumption=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The above equations allow us to write the equivalent expressions under an assumption of constant values for the electric field, such that the integral reduces to &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\vec{E} \cdot \Delta \vec{l} = -(E_x \Delta x + E_y \Delta y + E_z \Delta z)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This also leads directly to the inverse expression:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vec{E} = -(\frac{\Delta V_x}{\Delta x} + \frac{\Delta V_y}{\Delta y} + \frac{\Delta V_z}{\Delta z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric potential difference in a field which is nonuniform, but whose variations are discrete, is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\sum \vec{E}\cdot \Delta\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The different parts in this particular equation resembles the equation for the potential difference in an uniform field, except that with the nonuniform field, the potential difference in the different fields are summed up. This situation can be quite easy, but when the system gets difficult, first, choose a path and divide it into smaller pieces of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;; second, write an expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -\vec{E}\cdot\Delta\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of one piece; third, add up the contributions of all the pieces; last, check the result to make sure the magnitude, direction, and units make sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is important to keep track of the sign differences. If the path follows the direction of the electric field, the sign of the potential difference will be negative. This may be imagined as dropping a positive test charge in an electric field: a positive charge will be accelerated in the direction of the field, meaning that it is gaining energy, and so its potential must be decreasing. By contrast, if the path is opposite the direction of the field, potential will be increasing, much like rolling a boulder up a hill. If the path is perpendicular to the direction of the electric field, the dot product will be equal to zero. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, when working with different situations, it is nice to keep in mind that in a conductor, the electric field is zero. Therefore, the potential difference is zero as well. In an insulator, the electric field is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{E_{applied}}{K}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the dielectric constant. Furthermore, the potential difference over a round trip is equal to zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
Click on the link to see Electric Potential through VPython!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Make sure to press &amp;quot;Run&amp;quot; to see the principle in action!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://trinket.io/embed/glowscript/0a7e486c94 Teach hand-on with GlowScript]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Watch this video for a more visual approach! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Rb9guSEeVE Electric Potential: Visualizing Voltage with 3D animations]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--== Models ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric potential of a particle at a point is equal to the potential difference of that particle with respect to infinity. Since we know how to calculate the potential difference using the formula, we can see that this implies that the electric potential at infinity is equal to zero. What does this mean? This means that a particle that is extremely far away has no potential energy. This makes sense, because a proton will not be affected by the electric field of another proton at a distance of infinity apart. This subtle detail aids in solving a case of problems types later on.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although electric potential is an important topic to learn, most problems encountered will not ask to find just the &amp;quot;electric potential,&amp;quot; instead, questions will most likely ask for the &amp;quot;electric potential difference.&amp;quot; This is because electric potential is measured using different locations, or more specifically pathways between the different locations, so instead of determining the electric potential of location A and the electric potential of final location B, it would make more sense to determine the &amp;quot;difference in electric potential between locations A and B.&amp;quot; The following mathematical model will further explain this. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like mentioned before, instead of electric potential, in most cases, electric potential difference is needed to be found. The general equation for the potential difference is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{{U}_{electric}} = {q} * ∆{V} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{{U}_{electric}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric potential energy, which is measured in Joules (J). &#039;&#039;&#039;q&#039;&#039;&#039; is the charge of the particle moving through the path of the electric potential difference, which is measured in coulombs (C). &#039;&#039;&#039;∆V&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric potential difference, which is measured in Joules per Coulomb (J/C), or just Volts (V).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Aside from the general equation, the electric potential difference can also be found in other ways. The potential difference in an &#039;&#039;&#039;uniform field&#039;&#039;&#039; is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{V} = -({E}_{x}∆{x} + {E}_{y}∆{y} + {E}_{z}∆{z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;, which can also be written as &#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{V} = -\vec{E}·∆\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the electric potential difference, which is measured in Joules per Coulomb (J/C), or just Volts (V). &#039;&#039;&#039;E&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric field, which is measured in Newtons per Coulomb (N/C), and it is important to note that the different direction components of the electric field are used in the equation. &#039;&#039;&#039;l&#039;&#039;&#039; (or the &#039;&#039;&#039;x&#039;&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;&#039;y&#039;&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;&#039;z&#039;&#039;&#039;) is the distance between the two described locations, which is measured in meters, and x, y, and z, are the different components of the difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, when working with different situations, it is nice to keep in mind that in a conductor, the electric field is zero. Therefore, the potential difference is zero as well. In an insulator, the electric field is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;{E}_{applied} / K&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; where &#039;&#039;&#039;K&#039;&#039;&#039; is the dielectric constant. Also, the round trip potential difference is always zero, or in other words, if you start from a certain point and end at the same point, then, the potential difference will be zero. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
In a capacitor, the negative charges are located on the left plate, and the positive charges are located on the right plate. Location A is at the left end of the capacitor, and Location B is at the right end of the capacitor, or in other words, Location A and B are only different in terms of their x component location. The path moves from A to B. What is the direction of the electric field? Is the potential difference positive or negative? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ep125.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer: The electric field is to the left. The potential difference is increasing, or is positive.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
The electric field always moves away from the positive charge and towards the negative charge, which means the electric field in this example is to the left. Because the direction and the electric field and the direction of the path are opposite, the potential difference is increasing, or is positive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Calculate the change in electric potential between point A, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(-4, 3,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and B, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(2,-2,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; . The electric field in the location is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; (50,0,0) \; N/C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:EP mid fig.png ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer: -300V&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta\vec{l}= (2,-2,0)\;m - (-4,3,0)\;m = (6,-5,0)\;m &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -({E}_{x}∆{x} + {E}_{y}∆{y} + {E}_{z}∆{z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -(50\; N/C \cdot 6 \;m + 0 \; N/c \cdot -5 \; m + 0\cdot 0)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -300 V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Bohr Model]] of the hydrogen atom treats it as a nucleus of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; +e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; electrons of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; orbiting in circular orbits of specific radii. Calculate the potential difference between two points, one infinitely far away from the nucleus, and the other one Bohr radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; away from the nucleus (don&#039;t worry about substituting in the values). Compute the electric potential energy associated with the electron one Bohr radius away from the nucleus, setting the potential energy at infinity as zero (remember the sign of the charge). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We may compute the electric potential by taking integrating the electric field of a point charge as the radius goes from infinity to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. This integral may be set up as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\int_\infty^{a_0} \vec{E}\cdot\text{d}\vec{l} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \int_\infty^{a_0} \frac{\text{d} r}{r^2} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This may then be solved:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\biggr{(}\frac{1}{r}\biggr{|}_\infty^{a_0} = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
to compute the potential energy, we now multiply by the charge of the electron: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, giving &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -\frac{e^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Depending on what physics or chemistry courses you may have taken before, this may be recognizable as twice the ionization energy of the n=1 orbital. The factor of two is due to the fact that in the Bohr model, the kinetic energy will be exactly half of this potential energy, and will be positive so that the net result is still negative, but with half the magnitude. This understanding of the hydrogen atom gets certain values right, but the reality of the situation is far more complicated. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is this topic connected to something that you are interested in?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am interested in robotic systems and building circuit boards and electrical systems for manufacturing robots. While studying this section in the book, I was able to connect back many of the concepts and calculations back to robotics and the electrical component of automated systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Since high school, I never really understood how to work with the voltmeter and what it measured, and I have always wanted to know, but although this particular wiki page did not go into the details and other branches of electric potential, it led me to find the answers to something I was interested in since high school, the concept of electric potential.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I think electively is really interesting. When I was younger, I participated in this demo where a group of people hold hands and someone touches this special ball full of charge. We all could feel the tingling sensation of the current passing through us. It’s cool to learn the theory behind the supposed magic that occurs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I think it&#039;s very interesting that electric potential can be seen as a property of a space and that we can have further applications using this property.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is it connected to your major?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am a Mechanical Engineering major, so I will be dealing with the electrical components of machines when I work. Therefore, I have to know these certain concepts such as electric potential in order to fully understand how they work and interact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revistionist] As a biochemistry major, electric potential and electric potential difference is not particularly related to my major, but in chemistry classes, we use electrostatic potential maps (electrostatic potential energy maps) that shows the charge distributions throughout a molecule. Although the main use in electric potential is different in physics and biochemistry (where physicists use it identify the effect of the electric field at a location), I still found it interesting as the concept of electric potential (buildup) was being used in quite a different way. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I am a computer science major. Although I deal mostly with software, the hardware aspect is still important. The algorithms that I design run differently on different machines. The time complexity of an algorithm is sometimes useless when worrying about constant factors that are determined by a system’s hardware. Quicksort, for instance, is usually faster than many other sorts that have lower time complexities. The hardware of computers heavily relies on electricity and current (which is induced by a potential difference) to switch transistors on and off and thereby process information. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I am an aerospace engineering major, and I think understanding such concepts will help me have a better holistic understanding towards fields and systems. In addition, the thinking behind solving related problems will help me better prepared for future classes that involve with solving dynamics problems. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Is there an interesting industrial application?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] Electrical potential is used to find the voltage across a path. This is useful when working with circuit components and attempting to manipulate the power output or current throughout a component.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Electric potential sensors are being used to detect a variety of electrical signals made by the human body, thus contributing to the field of electrophysiology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] The study of electric potential has lead scientists to generate very safe wires that will not overheat and cause fires. Connecting circuits to ground is important and the third prong in an electrical outlet is this ground connection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The idea of electric potential, in a way, started with Ben Franklin and his experiments in the 1740s. He began to understand the flow of electricity, which eventually paved the path towards explaining electric potential and potential difference. Scientists finally began to understand how electric fields were actually affecting the charges and the surrounding environment. Benjamin Franklin first shocked himself in 1746, while conducting experiments on electricity with found objects from around his house. Six years later, or 261 years ago for us, the founding father flew a kite attached to a key and a silk ribbon in a thunderstorm and effectively trapped lightning in a jar. The experiment is now seen as a watershed moment in mankind&#039;s venture to channel a force of nature that was viewed quite abstractly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the time Franklin started experimenting with electricity, he&#039;d already found fame and fortune as the author of Poor Richard&#039;s Almanack. Electricity wasn&#039;t a very well understood phenomenon at that point, so Franklin&#039;s research proved to be fairly foundational. The early experiments, experts believe, were inspired by other scientists&#039; work and the shortcomings therein.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ep135.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
source: http://www.benjamin-franklin-history.org/kite-experiment/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That early brush with the dangers of electricity left an impression on Franklin. He described the sensation as &amp;quot;a universal blow throughout my whole body from head to foot, which seemed within as well as without; after which the first thing I took notice of was a violent quick shaking of my body.&amp;quot; However, it didn&#039;t scare him away. In the handful of years before his famous kite experiment, Franklin contributed everything from designing the first battery designs to establishing some common nomenclature in the study of electricity. Although Franklin is often coined the father of electricity, after he set the foundations of electricity, many other scientists contributed his or her research in the advancement of electricity and eventually led to the discovery of electric potential and potential difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like mentioned multiple times throughout the page, although electric potential is a huge and important topic, it has many branches, which makes the concept of electric potential difficult to stand alone. Even with this page, to support the concept of electric potential, many crucial branches of the topic appeared, like potential difference (which also branched into [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_Path_Independence,_claimed_by_Aditya_Mohile Potential Difference Path Independence]], [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_in_a_Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Uniform Field]], and [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_of_Point_Charge_in_a_Non-Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Nonuniform Field]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External Links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] https://www.khanacademy.org/test-prep/mcat/physical-processes/electrostatics-1/v/electric-potential-at-a-point-in-space&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pcWz4tP_zUw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vpa_uApmNoo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] https://www.khanacademy.org/science/electrical-engineering/ee-electrostatics/ee-fields-potential-voltage/a/ee-electric-potential-voltage&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] &amp;quot;Benjamin Franklin and Electricity.&amp;quot; Benjamin Franklin and Electricity. N.p., n.d. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.americaslibrary.gov/aa/franklinb/aa_franklinb_electric_1.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Bottyan, Thomas. &amp;quot;Electrostatic Potential Maps.&amp;quot; Chemwiki. N.p., 02 Oct. 2013. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://chemwiki.ucdavis.edu/Core/Theoretical_Chemistry/Chemical_Bonding/General_Principles_of_Chemical_Bonding/Electrostatic_Potential_maps&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] &amp;quot;Electric Potential Difference.&amp;quot; Electric Potential Difference. The Physics Classroom, n.d. Web. 14 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/circuits/Lesson-1/Electric-Potential-Difference&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] Harland, C. J., T. D. Clark, and R. J. Prance. &amp;quot;Applications of Electric Potential (Displacement Current) Sensors in Human Body Electrophysiology.&amp;quot; International Society for Industrial Process Tomography, n.d. Web. 16 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.isipt.org/world-congress/3/269.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] Sherwood, Bruce A. &amp;quot;2.1 The Momentum Principle.&amp;quot; Matter &amp;amp; Interactions. By Ruth W. Chabay. 4th ed. Vol. 1. N.p.: John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons, 2015. 45-50. Print. Modern Mechanics.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurence12799</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=38623</id>
		<title>Electric Potential</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=38623"/>
		<updated>2020-03-24T20:17:32Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurence12799: /* A Mathematical Model */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039;, like all forms of potential energy, is the potential for work to be done, in this case by the electric force. The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; (frequently referred to as voltage, from its SI unit, the Volt) is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; associated with the test charge (1 Coulomb), such that it depends only on the source, just as the electric field is related to the electric force, but depends only on the source. One may similarly remember the parallel concept of the gravitational potential, which was gravitational potential energy divided by mass.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined with respect to the [[Electric Force]] &amp;amp; [[Electric Field]]:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} = - q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; from point b to point a&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the charge in the electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the source charge&#039;s electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a differential length along the path from point b to point a&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricPotentialPaths.png|400px|right|thumb|Some sets of electrically equivalent paths for a charge.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From this, the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; per test charge in the source charge&#039;s electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{U_{ab}}{q} = - \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The electric field is a &#039;&#039;conservative vector field&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:::This means that any path used in the above line integral will give the same value for the same beginning and end points (b and a). Looking at the figure to the right, many paths for a charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; subject to the electric field of source charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are shown. In each set of four paths (Green, Blue, Yellow, and Pink), the same amount of &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is gained or lost. &lt;br /&gt;
*A special case shown in dark green near the bottom right of the figure also exists:&lt;br /&gt;
:::If a charge is moving along a path that is always perpendicular to the electric field, the line integral will evaluate to zero, and therefore the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; will also evaluate to zero.&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is easily shown with the dot product; if two variable vectors are always perpendicular, then their dot product is always zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricPotentialRadial.png|400px|right|thumb|Illustration of radial potential.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; between two point charges &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(Q \ \text{and} \ q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be written in a simpler expression:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr ( \frac{1}{r_{a}} - \frac{1}{r_{b}} \biggr )&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the charge in the source&#039;s electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{a}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the final position &lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{b}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the initial position&lt;br /&gt;
:*The initial position is often taken to be infinity (the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined to be zero at infinity) creating a simpler and more familiar looking equation:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} r}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
:::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the distance between the source charge and the charge in the electric field&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is used to described the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; gained or lost when moving a charge radially closer to a source charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
===Externals links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Main Idea ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electric potential energy, like all forms of potential energy, is the potential for work to be done, in this case by the electric force. The electric potential (frequently referred to as voltage, from its SI unit the Volt) is the electric potential energy associated with the test charge, such that it depends only on the source, just as the electric field is related to the electric force, but depends only on the source. One may similarly remember the parallel concept of the gravitational potential, which was gravitational potential energy divided by mass.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
====Electric Potential Energy====&lt;br /&gt;
Electric potential energy may be calculated in a variety of manners, depending upon the situation. The electric potential energy between two point charges may be written in a form which follows directly from the definition of the Coulomb force:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = \frac{qQ}{4\pi\epsilon_0 r_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is the amount of energy which would be required to bring one of the charged objects (by convention the small &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; q &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; charge) from an infinite distance to its current position, where, by convention, the potential energy at infinity is equal to zero. This may, therefore, be derived from the equation for work:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Derivation with Calculus=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -W = -\int_\infty^{r_0} \vec{F}_E(r) \cdot \text{d} \vec{r} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -\int_\infty^{r_0} \frac{qQ \hat{r}}{4\pi\epsilon_0 r^2} \cdot \text{d} \vec{r} = -\frac{qQ}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\int_\infty^{r_0} \frac{\hat{r} \cdot \hat{r}}{r^2} \text{d} r &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = \frac{qQ}{4\pi \epsilon_0} \biggr{(} \frac{1}{r} \biggr{|}_{\infty}^{r_0} = \frac{qQ}{4\pi \epsilon_0 r_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Given our definition of the [[Electric Field]], we have that &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vec{F}_E(r) = q\vec{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
so the electric potential energy may be generally written as &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -q\int_a^b \vec{E} \cdot \text{d} \vec{r} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Linear assumption=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the above equation, one can see that if the electric field is constant over the length of the path, then electric potential energy may be written in a simplified manner as&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = q\vec{E}\cdot\Delta \vec{s} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Electric Potential====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just as we divided by charge to go from electric force to electric field, dividing by charge takes us from the electric potential energy to the electric potential. For a test particle of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; q &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we define &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; V = \frac{U}{q} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Derivation with Calculus=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is not especially meaningful without choosing a reference point, just as for potential energy. Thus, one may speak of the potential difference between two points, which is independent of the reference value. From the above definition of electric potential energy, it is possible to derive an expression for the potential difference between two points from the electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\int_a^b \vec{E} \cdot \text{d} \vec{s} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The vectors are used to express the path associated with this integral. The difference in electric potential will be the same no matter what path one takes, as explored in [[Path Independence of Electric Potential]]. This also allows one to write the inverse relationship, determining the electric field at a given point from the electric potential in one and three dimensions respectively:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; E = -\frac{\text{d}V}{\text{d}x}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vec{E} = -\nabla V &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \nabla &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the gradient operator.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Linear Assumption=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The above equations allow us to write the equivalent expressions under an assumption of constant values for the electric field, such that the integral reduces to &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\vec{E} \cdot \Delta \vec{l} = -(E_x \Delta x + E_y \Delta y + E_z \Delta z)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This also leads directly to the inverse expression:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vec{E} = -(\frac{\Delta V_x}{\Delta x} + \frac{\Delta V_y}{\Delta y} + \frac{\Delta V_z}{\Delta z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric potential difference in a field which is nonuniform, but whose variations are discrete, is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\sum \vec{E}\cdot \Delta\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The different parts in this particular equation resembles the equation for the potential difference in an uniform field, except that with the nonuniform field, the potential difference in the different fields are summed up. This situation can be quite easy, but when the system gets difficult, first, choose a path and divide it into smaller pieces of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;; second, write an expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -\vec{E}\cdot\Delta\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of one piece; third, add up the contributions of all the pieces; last, check the result to make sure the magnitude, direction, and units make sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is important to keep track of the sign differences. If the path follows the direction of the electric field, the sign of the potential difference will be negative. This may be imagined as dropping a positive test charge in an electric field: a positive charge will be accelerated in the direction of the field, meaning that it is gaining energy, and so its potential must be decreasing. By contrast, if the path is opposite the direction of the field, potential will be increasing, much like rolling a boulder up a hill. If the path is perpendicular to the direction of the electric field, the dot product will be equal to zero. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, when working with different situations, it is nice to keep in mind that in a conductor, the electric field is zero. Therefore, the potential difference is zero as well. In an insulator, the electric field is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{E_{applied}}{K}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the dielectric constant. Furthermore, the potential difference over a round trip is equal to zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
Click on the link to see Electric Potential through VPython!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Make sure to press &amp;quot;Run&amp;quot; to see the principle in action!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://trinket.io/embed/glowscript/0a7e486c94 Teach hand-on with GlowScript]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Watch this video for a more visual approach! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Rb9guSEeVE Electric Potential: Visualizing Voltage with 3D animations]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--== Models ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric potential of a particle at a point is equal to the potential difference of that particle with respect to infinity. Since we know how to calculate the potential difference using the formula, we can see that this implies that the electric potential at infinity is equal to zero. What does this mean? This means that a particle that is extremely far away has no potential energy. This makes sense, because a proton will not be affected by the electric field of another proton at a distance of infinity apart. This subtle detail aids in solving a case of problems types later on.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although electric potential is an important topic to learn, most problems encountered will not ask to find just the &amp;quot;electric potential,&amp;quot; instead, questions will most likely ask for the &amp;quot;electric potential difference.&amp;quot; This is because electric potential is measured using different locations, or more specifically pathways between the different locations, so instead of determining the electric potential of location A and the electric potential of final location B, it would make more sense to determine the &amp;quot;difference in electric potential between locations A and B.&amp;quot; The following mathematical model will further explain this. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like mentioned before, instead of electric potential, in most cases, electric potential difference is needed to be found. The general equation for the potential difference is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{{U}_{electric}} = {q} * ∆{V} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{{U}_{electric}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric potential energy, which is measured in Joules (J). &#039;&#039;&#039;q&#039;&#039;&#039; is the charge of the particle moving through the path of the electric potential difference, which is measured in coulombs (C). &#039;&#039;&#039;∆V&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric potential difference, which is measured in Joules per Coulomb (J/C), or just Volts (V).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Aside from the general equation, the electric potential difference can also be found in other ways. The potential difference in an &#039;&#039;&#039;uniform field&#039;&#039;&#039; is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{V} = -({E}_{x}∆{x} + {E}_{y}∆{y} + {E}_{z}∆{z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;, which can also be written as &#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{V} = -\vec{E}·∆\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the electric potential difference, which is measured in Joules per Coulomb (J/C), or just Volts (V). &#039;&#039;&#039;E&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric field, which is measured in Newtons per Coulomb (N/C), and it is important to note that the different direction components of the electric field are used in the equation. &#039;&#039;&#039;l&#039;&#039;&#039; (or the &#039;&#039;&#039;x&#039;&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;&#039;y&#039;&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;&#039;z&#039;&#039;&#039;) is the distance between the two described locations, which is measured in meters, and x, y, and z, are the different components of the difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, when working with different situations, it is nice to keep in mind that in a conductor, the electric field is zero. Therefore, the potential difference is zero as well. In an insulator, the electric field is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;{E}_{applied} / K&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; where &#039;&#039;&#039;K&#039;&#039;&#039; is the dielectric constant. Also, the round trip potential difference is always zero, or in other words, if you start from a certain point and end at the same point, then, the potential difference will be zero. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
In a capacitor, the negative charges are located on the left plate, and the positive charges are located on the right plate. Location A is at the left end of the capacitor, and Location B is at the right end of the capacitor, or in other words, Location A and B are only different in terms of their x component location. The path moves from A to B. What is the direction of the electric field? Is the potential difference positive or negative? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ep125.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer: The electric field is to the left. The potential difference is increasing, or is positive.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
The electric field always moves away from the positive charge and towards the negative charge, which means the electric field in this example is to the left. Because the direction and the electric field and the direction of the path are opposite, the potential difference is increasing, or is positive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Calculate the change in electric potential between point A, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(-4, 3,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and B, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(2,-2,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; . The electric field in the location is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; (50,0,0) \; N/C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:EP mid fig.png ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer: -300V&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta\vec{l}= (2,-2,0)\;m - (-4,3,0)\;m = (6,-5,0)\;m &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -({E}_{x}∆{x} + {E}_{y}∆{y} + {E}_{z}∆{z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -(50\; N/C \cdot 6 \;m + 0 \; N/c \cdot -5 \; m + 0\cdot 0)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -300 V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Bohr Model]] of the hydrogen atom treats it as a nucleus of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; +e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; electrons of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; orbiting in circular orbits of specific radii. Calculate the potential difference between two points, one infinitely far away from the nucleus, and the other one Bohr radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; away from the nucleus (don&#039;t worry about substituting in the values). Compute the electric potential energy associated with the electron one Bohr radius away from the nucleus, setting the potential energy at infinity as zero (remember the sign of the charge). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We may compute the electric potential by taking integrating the electric field of a point charge as the radius goes from infinity to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. This integral may be set up as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\int_\infty^{a_0} \vec{E}\cdot\text{d}\vec{l} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \int_\infty^{a_0} \frac{\text{d} r}{r^2} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This may then be solved:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\biggr{(}\frac{1}{r}\biggr{|}_\infty^{a_0} = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
to compute the potential energy, we now multiply by the charge of the electron: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, giving &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -\frac{e^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Depending on what physics or chemistry courses you may have taken before, this may be recognizable as twice the ionization energy of the n=1 orbital. The factor of two is due to the fact that in the Bohr model, the kinetic energy will be exactly half of this potential energy, and will be positive so that the net result is still negative, but with half the magnitude. This understanding of the hydrogen atom gets certain values right, but the reality of the situation is far more complicated. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is this topic connected to something that you are interested in?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am interested in robotic systems and building circuit boards and electrical systems for manufacturing robots. While studying this section in the book, I was able to connect back many of the concepts and calculations back to robotics and the electrical component of automated systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Since high school, I never really understood how to work with the voltmeter and what it measured, and I have always wanted to know, but although this particular wiki page did not go into the details and other branches of electric potential, it led me to find the answers to something I was interested in since high school, the concept of electric potential.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I think electively is really interesting. When I was younger, I participated in this demo where a group of people hold hands and someone touches this special ball full of charge. We all could feel the tingling sensation of the current passing through us. It’s cool to learn the theory behind the supposed magic that occurs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I think it&#039;s very interesting that electric potential can be seen as a property of a space and that we can have further applications using this property.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is it connected to your major?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am a Mechanical Engineering major, so I will be dealing with the electrical components of machines when I work. Therefore, I have to know these certain concepts such as electric potential in order to fully understand how they work and interact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revistionist] As a biochemistry major, electric potential and electric potential difference is not particularly related to my major, but in chemistry classes, we use electrostatic potential maps (electrostatic potential energy maps) that shows the charge distributions throughout a molecule. Although the main use in electric potential is different in physics and biochemistry (where physicists use it identify the effect of the electric field at a location), I still found it interesting as the concept of electric potential (buildup) was being used in quite a different way. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I am a computer science major. Although I deal mostly with software, the hardware aspect is still important. The algorithms that I design run differently on different machines. The time complexity of an algorithm is sometimes useless when worrying about constant factors that are determined by a system’s hardware. Quicksort, for instance, is usually faster than many other sorts that have lower time complexities. The hardware of computers heavily relies on electricity and current (which is induced by a potential difference) to switch transistors on and off and thereby process information. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I am an aerospace engineering major, and I think understanding such concepts will help me have a better holistic understanding towards fields and systems. In addition, the thinking behind solving related problems will help me better prepared for future classes that involve with solving dynamics problems. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Is there an interesting industrial application?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] Electrical potential is used to find the voltage across a path. This is useful when working with circuit components and attempting to manipulate the power output or current throughout a component.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Electric potential sensors are being used to detect a variety of electrical signals made by the human body, thus contributing to the field of electrophysiology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] The study of electric potential has lead scientists to generate very safe wires that will not overheat and cause fires. Connecting circuits to ground is important and the third prong in an electrical outlet is this ground connection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The idea of electric potential, in a way, started with Ben Franklin and his experiments in the 1740s. He began to understand the flow of electricity, which eventually paved the path towards explaining electric potential and potential difference. Scientists finally began to understand how electric fields were actually affecting the charges and the surrounding environment. Benjamin Franklin first shocked himself in 1746, while conducting experiments on electricity with found objects from around his house. Six years later, or 261 years ago for us, the founding father flew a kite attached to a key and a silk ribbon in a thunderstorm and effectively trapped lightning in a jar. The experiment is now seen as a watershed moment in mankind&#039;s venture to channel a force of nature that was viewed quite abstractly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the time Franklin started experimenting with electricity, he&#039;d already found fame and fortune as the author of Poor Richard&#039;s Almanack. Electricity wasn&#039;t a very well understood phenomenon at that point, so Franklin&#039;s research proved to be fairly foundational. The early experiments, experts believe, were inspired by other scientists&#039; work and the shortcomings therein.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ep135.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
source: http://www.benjamin-franklin-history.org/kite-experiment/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That early brush with the dangers of electricity left an impression on Franklin. He described the sensation as &amp;quot;a universal blow throughout my whole body from head to foot, which seemed within as well as without; after which the first thing I took notice of was a violent quick shaking of my body.&amp;quot; However, it didn&#039;t scare him away. In the handful of years before his famous kite experiment, Franklin contributed everything from designing the first battery designs to establishing some common nomenclature in the study of electricity. Although Franklin is often coined the father of electricity, after he set the foundations of electricity, many other scientists contributed his or her research in the advancement of electricity and eventually led to the discovery of electric potential and potential difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like mentioned multiple times throughout the page, although electric potential is a huge and important topic, it has many branches, which makes the concept of electric potential difficult to stand alone. Even with this page, to support the concept of electric potential, many crucial branches of the topic appeared, like potential difference (which also branched into [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_Path_Independence,_claimed_by_Aditya_Mohile Potential Difference Path Independence]], [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_in_a_Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Uniform Field]], and [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_of_Point_Charge_in_a_Non-Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Nonuniform Field]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External Links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] https://www.khanacademy.org/test-prep/mcat/physical-processes/electrostatics-1/v/electric-potential-at-a-point-in-space&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pcWz4tP_zUw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vpa_uApmNoo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] https://www.khanacademy.org/science/electrical-engineering/ee-electrostatics/ee-fields-potential-voltage/a/ee-electric-potential-voltage&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] &amp;quot;Benjamin Franklin and Electricity.&amp;quot; Benjamin Franklin and Electricity. N.p., n.d. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.americaslibrary.gov/aa/franklinb/aa_franklinb_electric_1.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Bottyan, Thomas. &amp;quot;Electrostatic Potential Maps.&amp;quot; Chemwiki. N.p., 02 Oct. 2013. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://chemwiki.ucdavis.edu/Core/Theoretical_Chemistry/Chemical_Bonding/General_Principles_of_Chemical_Bonding/Electrostatic_Potential_maps&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] &amp;quot;Electric Potential Difference.&amp;quot; Electric Potential Difference. The Physics Classroom, n.d. Web. 14 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/circuits/Lesson-1/Electric-Potential-Difference&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] Harland, C. J., T. D. Clark, and R. J. Prance. &amp;quot;Applications of Electric Potential (Displacement Current) Sensors in Human Body Electrophysiology.&amp;quot; International Society for Industrial Process Tomography, n.d. Web. 16 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.isipt.org/world-congress/3/269.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] Sherwood, Bruce A. &amp;quot;2.1 The Momentum Principle.&amp;quot; Matter &amp;amp; Interactions. By Ruth W. Chabay. 4th ed. Vol. 1. N.p.: John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons, 2015. 45-50. Print. Modern Mechanics.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurence12799</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=38622</id>
		<title>Electric Potential</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=38622"/>
		<updated>2020-03-24T20:17:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurence12799: /* A Mathematical Model */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039;, like all forms of potential energy, is the potential for work to be done, in this case by the electric force. The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; (frequently referred to as voltage, from its SI unit, the Volt) is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; associated with the test charge (1 Coulomb), such that it depends only on the source, just as the electric field is related to the electric force, but depends only on the source. One may similarly remember the parallel concept of the gravitational potential, which was gravitational potential energy divided by mass.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined with respect to the [[Electric Force]] &amp;amp; [[Electric Field]]:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} = - q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; from point b to point a&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the charge in the electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the source charge&#039;s electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a differential length along the path from point b to point a&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricPotentialPaths.png|400px|right|thumb|Some sets of electrically equivalent paths for a charge.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From this, the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; per test charge in the source charge&#039;s electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{U_{ab}}{q} = - \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The electric field is a &#039;&#039;conservative vector field&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:::This means that any path used in the above line integral will give the same value for the same beginning and end points (b and a). Looking at the figure to the right, many paths for a charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; subject to the electric field of source charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are shown. In each set of four paths (Green, Blue, Yellow, and Pink), the same amount of &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is gained or lost. &lt;br /&gt;
*A special case shown in dark green near the bottom right of the figure also exists:&lt;br /&gt;
:::If a charge is moving along a path that is always perpendicular to the electric field, the line integral will evaluate to zero, and therefore the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; will also evaluate to zero.&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is easily shown with the dot product; if two variable vectors are always perpendicular, then their dot product is always zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricPotentialRadial.png|400px|right|thumb|Illustration of radial potential.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; between two point charges &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(Q \ \text{and} \ q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be written in a simpler expression:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr ( \frac{1}{r_{a}} - \frac{1}{r_{b}} \biggr )&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the charge in the source&#039;s electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{a}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the final position &lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{b}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the initial position&lt;br /&gt;
:*The initial position is often taken to be infinity (the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined to be zero at infinity) creating a simpler and more familiar looking equation:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} r}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
:::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the distance between the source charge and the charge in the electric field&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is used to described the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; gained or lost when moving a charge radially closer to another charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
===Externals links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Main Idea ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electric potential energy, like all forms of potential energy, is the potential for work to be done, in this case by the electric force. The electric potential (frequently referred to as voltage, from its SI unit the Volt) is the electric potential energy associated with the test charge, such that it depends only on the source, just as the electric field is related to the electric force, but depends only on the source. One may similarly remember the parallel concept of the gravitational potential, which was gravitational potential energy divided by mass.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
====Electric Potential Energy====&lt;br /&gt;
Electric potential energy may be calculated in a variety of manners, depending upon the situation. The electric potential energy between two point charges may be written in a form which follows directly from the definition of the Coulomb force:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = \frac{qQ}{4\pi\epsilon_0 r_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is the amount of energy which would be required to bring one of the charged objects (by convention the small &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; q &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; charge) from an infinite distance to its current position, where, by convention, the potential energy at infinity is equal to zero. This may, therefore, be derived from the equation for work:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Derivation with Calculus=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -W = -\int_\infty^{r_0} \vec{F}_E(r) \cdot \text{d} \vec{r} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -\int_\infty^{r_0} \frac{qQ \hat{r}}{4\pi\epsilon_0 r^2} \cdot \text{d} \vec{r} = -\frac{qQ}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\int_\infty^{r_0} \frac{\hat{r} \cdot \hat{r}}{r^2} \text{d} r &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = \frac{qQ}{4\pi \epsilon_0} \biggr{(} \frac{1}{r} \biggr{|}_{\infty}^{r_0} = \frac{qQ}{4\pi \epsilon_0 r_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Given our definition of the [[Electric Field]], we have that &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vec{F}_E(r) = q\vec{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
so the electric potential energy may be generally written as &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -q\int_a^b \vec{E} \cdot \text{d} \vec{r} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Linear assumption=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the above equation, one can see that if the electric field is constant over the length of the path, then electric potential energy may be written in a simplified manner as&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = q\vec{E}\cdot\Delta \vec{s} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Electric Potential====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just as we divided by charge to go from electric force to electric field, dividing by charge takes us from the electric potential energy to the electric potential. For a test particle of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; q &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we define &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; V = \frac{U}{q} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Derivation with Calculus=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is not especially meaningful without choosing a reference point, just as for potential energy. Thus, one may speak of the potential difference between two points, which is independent of the reference value. From the above definition of electric potential energy, it is possible to derive an expression for the potential difference between two points from the electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\int_a^b \vec{E} \cdot \text{d} \vec{s} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The vectors are used to express the path associated with this integral. The difference in electric potential will be the same no matter what path one takes, as explored in [[Path Independence of Electric Potential]]. This also allows one to write the inverse relationship, determining the electric field at a given point from the electric potential in one and three dimensions respectively:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; E = -\frac{\text{d}V}{\text{d}x}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vec{E} = -\nabla V &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \nabla &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the gradient operator.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Linear Assumption=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The above equations allow us to write the equivalent expressions under an assumption of constant values for the electric field, such that the integral reduces to &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\vec{E} \cdot \Delta \vec{l} = -(E_x \Delta x + E_y \Delta y + E_z \Delta z)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This also leads directly to the inverse expression:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vec{E} = -(\frac{\Delta V_x}{\Delta x} + \frac{\Delta V_y}{\Delta y} + \frac{\Delta V_z}{\Delta z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric potential difference in a field which is nonuniform, but whose variations are discrete, is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\sum \vec{E}\cdot \Delta\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The different parts in this particular equation resembles the equation for the potential difference in an uniform field, except that with the nonuniform field, the potential difference in the different fields are summed up. This situation can be quite easy, but when the system gets difficult, first, choose a path and divide it into smaller pieces of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;; second, write an expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -\vec{E}\cdot\Delta\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of one piece; third, add up the contributions of all the pieces; last, check the result to make sure the magnitude, direction, and units make sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is important to keep track of the sign differences. If the path follows the direction of the electric field, the sign of the potential difference will be negative. This may be imagined as dropping a positive test charge in an electric field: a positive charge will be accelerated in the direction of the field, meaning that it is gaining energy, and so its potential must be decreasing. By contrast, if the path is opposite the direction of the field, potential will be increasing, much like rolling a boulder up a hill. If the path is perpendicular to the direction of the electric field, the dot product will be equal to zero. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, when working with different situations, it is nice to keep in mind that in a conductor, the electric field is zero. Therefore, the potential difference is zero as well. In an insulator, the electric field is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{E_{applied}}{K}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the dielectric constant. Furthermore, the potential difference over a round trip is equal to zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
Click on the link to see Electric Potential through VPython!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Make sure to press &amp;quot;Run&amp;quot; to see the principle in action!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://trinket.io/embed/glowscript/0a7e486c94 Teach hand-on with GlowScript]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Watch this video for a more visual approach! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Rb9guSEeVE Electric Potential: Visualizing Voltage with 3D animations]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--== Models ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric potential of a particle at a point is equal to the potential difference of that particle with respect to infinity. Since we know how to calculate the potential difference using the formula, we can see that this implies that the electric potential at infinity is equal to zero. What does this mean? This means that a particle that is extremely far away has no potential energy. This makes sense, because a proton will not be affected by the electric field of another proton at a distance of infinity apart. This subtle detail aids in solving a case of problems types later on.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although electric potential is an important topic to learn, most problems encountered will not ask to find just the &amp;quot;electric potential,&amp;quot; instead, questions will most likely ask for the &amp;quot;electric potential difference.&amp;quot; This is because electric potential is measured using different locations, or more specifically pathways between the different locations, so instead of determining the electric potential of location A and the electric potential of final location B, it would make more sense to determine the &amp;quot;difference in electric potential between locations A and B.&amp;quot; The following mathematical model will further explain this. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like mentioned before, instead of electric potential, in most cases, electric potential difference is needed to be found. The general equation for the potential difference is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{{U}_{electric}} = {q} * ∆{V} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{{U}_{electric}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric potential energy, which is measured in Joules (J). &#039;&#039;&#039;q&#039;&#039;&#039; is the charge of the particle moving through the path of the electric potential difference, which is measured in coulombs (C). &#039;&#039;&#039;∆V&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric potential difference, which is measured in Joules per Coulomb (J/C), or just Volts (V).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Aside from the general equation, the electric potential difference can also be found in other ways. The potential difference in an &#039;&#039;&#039;uniform field&#039;&#039;&#039; is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{V} = -({E}_{x}∆{x} + {E}_{y}∆{y} + {E}_{z}∆{z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;, which can also be written as &#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{V} = -\vec{E}·∆\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the electric potential difference, which is measured in Joules per Coulomb (J/C), or just Volts (V). &#039;&#039;&#039;E&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric field, which is measured in Newtons per Coulomb (N/C), and it is important to note that the different direction components of the electric field are used in the equation. &#039;&#039;&#039;l&#039;&#039;&#039; (or the &#039;&#039;&#039;x&#039;&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;&#039;y&#039;&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;&#039;z&#039;&#039;&#039;) is the distance between the two described locations, which is measured in meters, and x, y, and z, are the different components of the difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, when working with different situations, it is nice to keep in mind that in a conductor, the electric field is zero. Therefore, the potential difference is zero as well. In an insulator, the electric field is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;{E}_{applied} / K&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; where &#039;&#039;&#039;K&#039;&#039;&#039; is the dielectric constant. Also, the round trip potential difference is always zero, or in other words, if you start from a certain point and end at the same point, then, the potential difference will be zero. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
In a capacitor, the negative charges are located on the left plate, and the positive charges are located on the right plate. Location A is at the left end of the capacitor, and Location B is at the right end of the capacitor, or in other words, Location A and B are only different in terms of their x component location. The path moves from A to B. What is the direction of the electric field? Is the potential difference positive or negative? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ep125.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer: The electric field is to the left. The potential difference is increasing, or is positive.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
The electric field always moves away from the positive charge and towards the negative charge, which means the electric field in this example is to the left. Because the direction and the electric field and the direction of the path are opposite, the potential difference is increasing, or is positive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Calculate the change in electric potential between point A, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(-4, 3,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and B, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(2,-2,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; . The electric field in the location is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; (50,0,0) \; N/C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:EP mid fig.png ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer: -300V&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta\vec{l}= (2,-2,0)\;m - (-4,3,0)\;m = (6,-5,0)\;m &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -({E}_{x}∆{x} + {E}_{y}∆{y} + {E}_{z}∆{z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -(50\; N/C \cdot 6 \;m + 0 \; N/c \cdot -5 \; m + 0\cdot 0)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -300 V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Bohr Model]] of the hydrogen atom treats it as a nucleus of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; +e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; electrons of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; orbiting in circular orbits of specific radii. Calculate the potential difference between two points, one infinitely far away from the nucleus, and the other one Bohr radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; away from the nucleus (don&#039;t worry about substituting in the values). Compute the electric potential energy associated with the electron one Bohr radius away from the nucleus, setting the potential energy at infinity as zero (remember the sign of the charge). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We may compute the electric potential by taking integrating the electric field of a point charge as the radius goes from infinity to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. This integral may be set up as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\int_\infty^{a_0} \vec{E}\cdot\text{d}\vec{l} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \int_\infty^{a_0} \frac{\text{d} r}{r^2} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This may then be solved:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\biggr{(}\frac{1}{r}\biggr{|}_\infty^{a_0} = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
to compute the potential energy, we now multiply by the charge of the electron: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, giving &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -\frac{e^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Depending on what physics or chemistry courses you may have taken before, this may be recognizable as twice the ionization energy of the n=1 orbital. The factor of two is due to the fact that in the Bohr model, the kinetic energy will be exactly half of this potential energy, and will be positive so that the net result is still negative, but with half the magnitude. This understanding of the hydrogen atom gets certain values right, but the reality of the situation is far more complicated. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is this topic connected to something that you are interested in?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am interested in robotic systems and building circuit boards and electrical systems for manufacturing robots. While studying this section in the book, I was able to connect back many of the concepts and calculations back to robotics and the electrical component of automated systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Since high school, I never really understood how to work with the voltmeter and what it measured, and I have always wanted to know, but although this particular wiki page did not go into the details and other branches of electric potential, it led me to find the answers to something I was interested in since high school, the concept of electric potential.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I think electively is really interesting. When I was younger, I participated in this demo where a group of people hold hands and someone touches this special ball full of charge. We all could feel the tingling sensation of the current passing through us. It’s cool to learn the theory behind the supposed magic that occurs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I think it&#039;s very interesting that electric potential can be seen as a property of a space and that we can have further applications using this property.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is it connected to your major?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am a Mechanical Engineering major, so I will be dealing with the electrical components of machines when I work. Therefore, I have to know these certain concepts such as electric potential in order to fully understand how they work and interact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revistionist] As a biochemistry major, electric potential and electric potential difference is not particularly related to my major, but in chemistry classes, we use electrostatic potential maps (electrostatic potential energy maps) that shows the charge distributions throughout a molecule. Although the main use in electric potential is different in physics and biochemistry (where physicists use it identify the effect of the electric field at a location), I still found it interesting as the concept of electric potential (buildup) was being used in quite a different way. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I am a computer science major. Although I deal mostly with software, the hardware aspect is still important. The algorithms that I design run differently on different machines. The time complexity of an algorithm is sometimes useless when worrying about constant factors that are determined by a system’s hardware. Quicksort, for instance, is usually faster than many other sorts that have lower time complexities. The hardware of computers heavily relies on electricity and current (which is induced by a potential difference) to switch transistors on and off and thereby process information. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I am an aerospace engineering major, and I think understanding such concepts will help me have a better holistic understanding towards fields and systems. In addition, the thinking behind solving related problems will help me better prepared for future classes that involve with solving dynamics problems. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Is there an interesting industrial application?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] Electrical potential is used to find the voltage across a path. This is useful when working with circuit components and attempting to manipulate the power output or current throughout a component.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Electric potential sensors are being used to detect a variety of electrical signals made by the human body, thus contributing to the field of electrophysiology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] The study of electric potential has lead scientists to generate very safe wires that will not overheat and cause fires. Connecting circuits to ground is important and the third prong in an electrical outlet is this ground connection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The idea of electric potential, in a way, started with Ben Franklin and his experiments in the 1740s. He began to understand the flow of electricity, which eventually paved the path towards explaining electric potential and potential difference. Scientists finally began to understand how electric fields were actually affecting the charges and the surrounding environment. Benjamin Franklin first shocked himself in 1746, while conducting experiments on electricity with found objects from around his house. Six years later, or 261 years ago for us, the founding father flew a kite attached to a key and a silk ribbon in a thunderstorm and effectively trapped lightning in a jar. The experiment is now seen as a watershed moment in mankind&#039;s venture to channel a force of nature that was viewed quite abstractly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the time Franklin started experimenting with electricity, he&#039;d already found fame and fortune as the author of Poor Richard&#039;s Almanack. Electricity wasn&#039;t a very well understood phenomenon at that point, so Franklin&#039;s research proved to be fairly foundational. The early experiments, experts believe, were inspired by other scientists&#039; work and the shortcomings therein.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ep135.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
source: http://www.benjamin-franklin-history.org/kite-experiment/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That early brush with the dangers of electricity left an impression on Franklin. He described the sensation as &amp;quot;a universal blow throughout my whole body from head to foot, which seemed within as well as without; after which the first thing I took notice of was a violent quick shaking of my body.&amp;quot; However, it didn&#039;t scare him away. In the handful of years before his famous kite experiment, Franklin contributed everything from designing the first battery designs to establishing some common nomenclature in the study of electricity. Although Franklin is often coined the father of electricity, after he set the foundations of electricity, many other scientists contributed his or her research in the advancement of electricity and eventually led to the discovery of electric potential and potential difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like mentioned multiple times throughout the page, although electric potential is a huge and important topic, it has many branches, which makes the concept of electric potential difficult to stand alone. Even with this page, to support the concept of electric potential, many crucial branches of the topic appeared, like potential difference (which also branched into [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_Path_Independence,_claimed_by_Aditya_Mohile Potential Difference Path Independence]], [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_in_a_Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Uniform Field]], and [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_of_Point_Charge_in_a_Non-Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Nonuniform Field]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External Links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] https://www.khanacademy.org/test-prep/mcat/physical-processes/electrostatics-1/v/electric-potential-at-a-point-in-space&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pcWz4tP_zUw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vpa_uApmNoo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] https://www.khanacademy.org/science/electrical-engineering/ee-electrostatics/ee-fields-potential-voltage/a/ee-electric-potential-voltage&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] &amp;quot;Benjamin Franklin and Electricity.&amp;quot; Benjamin Franklin and Electricity. N.p., n.d. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.americaslibrary.gov/aa/franklinb/aa_franklinb_electric_1.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Bottyan, Thomas. &amp;quot;Electrostatic Potential Maps.&amp;quot; Chemwiki. N.p., 02 Oct. 2013. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://chemwiki.ucdavis.edu/Core/Theoretical_Chemistry/Chemical_Bonding/General_Principles_of_Chemical_Bonding/Electrostatic_Potential_maps&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] &amp;quot;Electric Potential Difference.&amp;quot; Electric Potential Difference. The Physics Classroom, n.d. Web. 14 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/circuits/Lesson-1/Electric-Potential-Difference&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] Harland, C. J., T. D. Clark, and R. J. Prance. &amp;quot;Applications of Electric Potential (Displacement Current) Sensors in Human Body Electrophysiology.&amp;quot; International Society for Industrial Process Tomography, n.d. Web. 16 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.isipt.org/world-congress/3/269.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] Sherwood, Bruce A. &amp;quot;2.1 The Momentum Principle.&amp;quot; Matter &amp;amp; Interactions. By Ruth W. Chabay. 4th ed. Vol. 1. N.p.: John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons, 2015. 45-50. Print. Modern Mechanics.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurence12799</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=File:ElectricPotentialRadial.png&amp;diff=38621</id>
		<title>File:ElectricPotentialRadial.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=File:ElectricPotentialRadial.png&amp;diff=38621"/>
		<updated>2020-03-24T20:12:40Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurence12799: A personally created figure for the Electric Potential page.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;A personally created figure for the Electric Potential page.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurence12799</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=38620</id>
		<title>Electric Potential</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=38620"/>
		<updated>2020-03-24T19:42:40Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurence12799: /* A Mathematical Model */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039;, like all forms of potential energy, is the potential for work to be done, in this case by the electric force. The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; (frequently referred to as voltage, from its SI unit, the Volt) is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; associated with the test charge (1 Coulomb), such that it depends only on the source, just as the electric field is related to the electric force, but depends only on the source. One may similarly remember the parallel concept of the gravitational potential, which was gravitational potential energy divided by mass.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined with respect to the [[Electric Force]] &amp;amp; [[Electric Field]]:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} = - q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; from point b to point a&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the charge in the electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the source charge&#039;s electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a differential length along the path from point b to point a&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricPotentialPaths.png|400px|right|thumb|Some sets of electrically equivalent paths for a charge.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From this, the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; per test charge in the source charge&#039;s electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{U_{ab}}{q} = - \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The electric field is a &#039;&#039;conservative vector field&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:::This means that any path used in the above line integral will give the same value for the same beginning and end points (b and a). Looking at the figure to the right, many paths for a charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; subject to the electric field of source charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are shown. In each set of four paths (Green, Blue, Yellow, and Pink), the same amount of &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is gained or lost. &lt;br /&gt;
*A special case shown in dark green near the bottom right of the figure also exists:&lt;br /&gt;
:::If a charge is moving along a path that is always perpendicular to the electric field, the line integral will evaluate to zero, and therefore the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; will also evaluate to zero.&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is easily shown with the dot product; if two variable vectors are always perpendicular, then their dot product is always zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; between two point charges &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(Q \ \text{and} \ q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be written in a simpler expression:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr ( \frac{1}{r_{a}} - \frac{1}{r_{b}} \biggr )&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the charge in the source&#039;s electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{a}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the final position &lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{b}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the initial position&lt;br /&gt;
:*The initial position is often taken to be infinity (the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined to be zero at infinity) creating a simpler and more familiar looking equation:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} r}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
:::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the distance between the source charge and the charge in the electric field&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is used to described the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; gained or lost when moving a charge radially closer to another charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;(ADD FIGURE OF TWO CHARGES)&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
===Externals links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Main Idea ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electric potential energy, like all forms of potential energy, is the potential for work to be done, in this case by the electric force. The electric potential (frequently referred to as voltage, from its SI unit the Volt) is the electric potential energy associated with the test charge, such that it depends only on the source, just as the electric field is related to the electric force, but depends only on the source. One may similarly remember the parallel concept of the gravitational potential, which was gravitational potential energy divided by mass.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
====Electric Potential Energy====&lt;br /&gt;
Electric potential energy may be calculated in a variety of manners, depending upon the situation. The electric potential energy between two point charges may be written in a form which follows directly from the definition of the Coulomb force:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = \frac{qQ}{4\pi\epsilon_0 r_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is the amount of energy which would be required to bring one of the charged objects (by convention the small &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; q &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; charge) from an infinite distance to its current position, where, by convention, the potential energy at infinity is equal to zero. This may, therefore, be derived from the equation for work:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Derivation with Calculus=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -W = -\int_\infty^{r_0} \vec{F}_E(r) \cdot \text{d} \vec{r} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -\int_\infty^{r_0} \frac{qQ \hat{r}}{4\pi\epsilon_0 r^2} \cdot \text{d} \vec{r} = -\frac{qQ}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\int_\infty^{r_0} \frac{\hat{r} \cdot \hat{r}}{r^2} \text{d} r &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = \frac{qQ}{4\pi \epsilon_0} \biggr{(} \frac{1}{r} \biggr{|}_{\infty}^{r_0} = \frac{qQ}{4\pi \epsilon_0 r_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Given our definition of the [[Electric Field]], we have that &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vec{F}_E(r) = q\vec{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
so the electric potential energy may be generally written as &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -q\int_a^b \vec{E} \cdot \text{d} \vec{r} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Linear assumption=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the above equation, one can see that if the electric field is constant over the length of the path, then electric potential energy may be written in a simplified manner as&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = q\vec{E}\cdot\Delta \vec{s} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Electric Potential====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just as we divided by charge to go from electric force to electric field, dividing by charge takes us from the electric potential energy to the electric potential. For a test particle of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; q &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we define &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; V = \frac{U}{q} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Derivation with Calculus=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is not especially meaningful without choosing a reference point, just as for potential energy. Thus, one may speak of the potential difference between two points, which is independent of the reference value. From the above definition of electric potential energy, it is possible to derive an expression for the potential difference between two points from the electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\int_a^b \vec{E} \cdot \text{d} \vec{s} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The vectors are used to express the path associated with this integral. The difference in electric potential will be the same no matter what path one takes, as explored in [[Path Independence of Electric Potential]]. This also allows one to write the inverse relationship, determining the electric field at a given point from the electric potential in one and three dimensions respectively:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; E = -\frac{\text{d}V}{\text{d}x}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vec{E} = -\nabla V &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \nabla &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the gradient operator.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Linear Assumption=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The above equations allow us to write the equivalent expressions under an assumption of constant values for the electric field, such that the integral reduces to &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\vec{E} \cdot \Delta \vec{l} = -(E_x \Delta x + E_y \Delta y + E_z \Delta z)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This also leads directly to the inverse expression:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vec{E} = -(\frac{\Delta V_x}{\Delta x} + \frac{\Delta V_y}{\Delta y} + \frac{\Delta V_z}{\Delta z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric potential difference in a field which is nonuniform, but whose variations are discrete, is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\sum \vec{E}\cdot \Delta\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The different parts in this particular equation resembles the equation for the potential difference in an uniform field, except that with the nonuniform field, the potential difference in the different fields are summed up. This situation can be quite easy, but when the system gets difficult, first, choose a path and divide it into smaller pieces of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;; second, write an expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -\vec{E}\cdot\Delta\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of one piece; third, add up the contributions of all the pieces; last, check the result to make sure the magnitude, direction, and units make sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is important to keep track of the sign differences. If the path follows the direction of the electric field, the sign of the potential difference will be negative. This may be imagined as dropping a positive test charge in an electric field: a positive charge will be accelerated in the direction of the field, meaning that it is gaining energy, and so its potential must be decreasing. By contrast, if the path is opposite the direction of the field, potential will be increasing, much like rolling a boulder up a hill. If the path is perpendicular to the direction of the electric field, the dot product will be equal to zero. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, when working with different situations, it is nice to keep in mind that in a conductor, the electric field is zero. Therefore, the potential difference is zero as well. In an insulator, the electric field is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{E_{applied}}{K}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the dielectric constant. Furthermore, the potential difference over a round trip is equal to zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
Click on the link to see Electric Potential through VPython!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Make sure to press &amp;quot;Run&amp;quot; to see the principle in action!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://trinket.io/embed/glowscript/0a7e486c94 Teach hand-on with GlowScript]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Watch this video for a more visual approach! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Rb9guSEeVE Electric Potential: Visualizing Voltage with 3D animations]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--== Models ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric potential of a particle at a point is equal to the potential difference of that particle with respect to infinity. Since we know how to calculate the potential difference using the formula, we can see that this implies that the electric potential at infinity is equal to zero. What does this mean? This means that a particle that is extremely far away has no potential energy. This makes sense, because a proton will not be affected by the electric field of another proton at a distance of infinity apart. This subtle detail aids in solving a case of problems types later on.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although electric potential is an important topic to learn, most problems encountered will not ask to find just the &amp;quot;electric potential,&amp;quot; instead, questions will most likely ask for the &amp;quot;electric potential difference.&amp;quot; This is because electric potential is measured using different locations, or more specifically pathways between the different locations, so instead of determining the electric potential of location A and the electric potential of final location B, it would make more sense to determine the &amp;quot;difference in electric potential between locations A and B.&amp;quot; The following mathematical model will further explain this. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like mentioned before, instead of electric potential, in most cases, electric potential difference is needed to be found. The general equation for the potential difference is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{{U}_{electric}} = {q} * ∆{V} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{{U}_{electric}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric potential energy, which is measured in Joules (J). &#039;&#039;&#039;q&#039;&#039;&#039; is the charge of the particle moving through the path of the electric potential difference, which is measured in coulombs (C). &#039;&#039;&#039;∆V&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric potential difference, which is measured in Joules per Coulomb (J/C), or just Volts (V).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Aside from the general equation, the electric potential difference can also be found in other ways. The potential difference in an &#039;&#039;&#039;uniform field&#039;&#039;&#039; is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{V} = -({E}_{x}∆{x} + {E}_{y}∆{y} + {E}_{z}∆{z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;, which can also be written as &#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{V} = -\vec{E}·∆\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the electric potential difference, which is measured in Joules per Coulomb (J/C), or just Volts (V). &#039;&#039;&#039;E&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric field, which is measured in Newtons per Coulomb (N/C), and it is important to note that the different direction components of the electric field are used in the equation. &#039;&#039;&#039;l&#039;&#039;&#039; (or the &#039;&#039;&#039;x&#039;&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;&#039;y&#039;&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;&#039;z&#039;&#039;&#039;) is the distance between the two described locations, which is measured in meters, and x, y, and z, are the different components of the difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, when working with different situations, it is nice to keep in mind that in a conductor, the electric field is zero. Therefore, the potential difference is zero as well. In an insulator, the electric field is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;{E}_{applied} / K&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; where &#039;&#039;&#039;K&#039;&#039;&#039; is the dielectric constant. Also, the round trip potential difference is always zero, or in other words, if you start from a certain point and end at the same point, then, the potential difference will be zero. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
In a capacitor, the negative charges are located on the left plate, and the positive charges are located on the right plate. Location A is at the left end of the capacitor, and Location B is at the right end of the capacitor, or in other words, Location A and B are only different in terms of their x component location. The path moves from A to B. What is the direction of the electric field? Is the potential difference positive or negative? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ep125.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer: The electric field is to the left. The potential difference is increasing, or is positive.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
The electric field always moves away from the positive charge and towards the negative charge, which means the electric field in this example is to the left. Because the direction and the electric field and the direction of the path are opposite, the potential difference is increasing, or is positive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Calculate the change in electric potential between point A, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(-4, 3,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and B, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(2,-2,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; . The electric field in the location is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; (50,0,0) \; N/C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:EP mid fig.png ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer: -300V&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta\vec{l}= (2,-2,0)\;m - (-4,3,0)\;m = (6,-5,0)\;m &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -({E}_{x}∆{x} + {E}_{y}∆{y} + {E}_{z}∆{z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -(50\; N/C \cdot 6 \;m + 0 \; N/c \cdot -5 \; m + 0\cdot 0)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -300 V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Bohr Model]] of the hydrogen atom treats it as a nucleus of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; +e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; electrons of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; orbiting in circular orbits of specific radii. Calculate the potential difference between two points, one infinitely far away from the nucleus, and the other one Bohr radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; away from the nucleus (don&#039;t worry about substituting in the values). Compute the electric potential energy associated with the electron one Bohr radius away from the nucleus, setting the potential energy at infinity as zero (remember the sign of the charge). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We may compute the electric potential by taking integrating the electric field of a point charge as the radius goes from infinity to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. This integral may be set up as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\int_\infty^{a_0} \vec{E}\cdot\text{d}\vec{l} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \int_\infty^{a_0} \frac{\text{d} r}{r^2} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This may then be solved:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\biggr{(}\frac{1}{r}\biggr{|}_\infty^{a_0} = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
to compute the potential energy, we now multiply by the charge of the electron: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, giving &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -\frac{e^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Depending on what physics or chemistry courses you may have taken before, this may be recognizable as twice the ionization energy of the n=1 orbital. The factor of two is due to the fact that in the Bohr model, the kinetic energy will be exactly half of this potential energy, and will be positive so that the net result is still negative, but with half the magnitude. This understanding of the hydrogen atom gets certain values right, but the reality of the situation is far more complicated. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is this topic connected to something that you are interested in?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am interested in robotic systems and building circuit boards and electrical systems for manufacturing robots. While studying this section in the book, I was able to connect back many of the concepts and calculations back to robotics and the electrical component of automated systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Since high school, I never really understood how to work with the voltmeter and what it measured, and I have always wanted to know, but although this particular wiki page did not go into the details and other branches of electric potential, it led me to find the answers to something I was interested in since high school, the concept of electric potential.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I think electively is really interesting. When I was younger, I participated in this demo where a group of people hold hands and someone touches this special ball full of charge. We all could feel the tingling sensation of the current passing through us. It’s cool to learn the theory behind the supposed magic that occurs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I think it&#039;s very interesting that electric potential can be seen as a property of a space and that we can have further applications using this property.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is it connected to your major?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am a Mechanical Engineering major, so I will be dealing with the electrical components of machines when I work. Therefore, I have to know these certain concepts such as electric potential in order to fully understand how they work and interact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revistionist] As a biochemistry major, electric potential and electric potential difference is not particularly related to my major, but in chemistry classes, we use electrostatic potential maps (electrostatic potential energy maps) that shows the charge distributions throughout a molecule. Although the main use in electric potential is different in physics and biochemistry (where physicists use it identify the effect of the electric field at a location), I still found it interesting as the concept of electric potential (buildup) was being used in quite a different way. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I am a computer science major. Although I deal mostly with software, the hardware aspect is still important. The algorithms that I design run differently on different machines. The time complexity of an algorithm is sometimes useless when worrying about constant factors that are determined by a system’s hardware. Quicksort, for instance, is usually faster than many other sorts that have lower time complexities. The hardware of computers heavily relies on electricity and current (which is induced by a potential difference) to switch transistors on and off and thereby process information. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I am an aerospace engineering major, and I think understanding such concepts will help me have a better holistic understanding towards fields and systems. In addition, the thinking behind solving related problems will help me better prepared for future classes that involve with solving dynamics problems. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Is there an interesting industrial application?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] Electrical potential is used to find the voltage across a path. This is useful when working with circuit components and attempting to manipulate the power output or current throughout a component.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Electric potential sensors are being used to detect a variety of electrical signals made by the human body, thus contributing to the field of electrophysiology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] The study of electric potential has lead scientists to generate very safe wires that will not overheat and cause fires. Connecting circuits to ground is important and the third prong in an electrical outlet is this ground connection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The idea of electric potential, in a way, started with Ben Franklin and his experiments in the 1740s. He began to understand the flow of electricity, which eventually paved the path towards explaining electric potential and potential difference. Scientists finally began to understand how electric fields were actually affecting the charges and the surrounding environment. Benjamin Franklin first shocked himself in 1746, while conducting experiments on electricity with found objects from around his house. Six years later, or 261 years ago for us, the founding father flew a kite attached to a key and a silk ribbon in a thunderstorm and effectively trapped lightning in a jar. The experiment is now seen as a watershed moment in mankind&#039;s venture to channel a force of nature that was viewed quite abstractly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the time Franklin started experimenting with electricity, he&#039;d already found fame and fortune as the author of Poor Richard&#039;s Almanack. Electricity wasn&#039;t a very well understood phenomenon at that point, so Franklin&#039;s research proved to be fairly foundational. The early experiments, experts believe, were inspired by other scientists&#039; work and the shortcomings therein.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ep135.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
source: http://www.benjamin-franklin-history.org/kite-experiment/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That early brush with the dangers of electricity left an impression on Franklin. He described the sensation as &amp;quot;a universal blow throughout my whole body from head to foot, which seemed within as well as without; after which the first thing I took notice of was a violent quick shaking of my body.&amp;quot; However, it didn&#039;t scare him away. In the handful of years before his famous kite experiment, Franklin contributed everything from designing the first battery designs to establishing some common nomenclature in the study of electricity. Although Franklin is often coined the father of electricity, after he set the foundations of electricity, many other scientists contributed his or her research in the advancement of electricity and eventually led to the discovery of electric potential and potential difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like mentioned multiple times throughout the page, although electric potential is a huge and important topic, it has many branches, which makes the concept of electric potential difficult to stand alone. Even with this page, to support the concept of electric potential, many crucial branches of the topic appeared, like potential difference (which also branched into [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_Path_Independence,_claimed_by_Aditya_Mohile Potential Difference Path Independence]], [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_in_a_Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Uniform Field]], and [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_of_Point_Charge_in_a_Non-Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Nonuniform Field]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External Links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] https://www.khanacademy.org/test-prep/mcat/physical-processes/electrostatics-1/v/electric-potential-at-a-point-in-space&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pcWz4tP_zUw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vpa_uApmNoo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] https://www.khanacademy.org/science/electrical-engineering/ee-electrostatics/ee-fields-potential-voltage/a/ee-electric-potential-voltage&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] &amp;quot;Benjamin Franklin and Electricity.&amp;quot; Benjamin Franklin and Electricity. N.p., n.d. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.americaslibrary.gov/aa/franklinb/aa_franklinb_electric_1.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Bottyan, Thomas. &amp;quot;Electrostatic Potential Maps.&amp;quot; Chemwiki. N.p., 02 Oct. 2013. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://chemwiki.ucdavis.edu/Core/Theoretical_Chemistry/Chemical_Bonding/General_Principles_of_Chemical_Bonding/Electrostatic_Potential_maps&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] &amp;quot;Electric Potential Difference.&amp;quot; Electric Potential Difference. The Physics Classroom, n.d. Web. 14 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/circuits/Lesson-1/Electric-Potential-Difference&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] Harland, C. J., T. D. Clark, and R. J. Prance. &amp;quot;Applications of Electric Potential (Displacement Current) Sensors in Human Body Electrophysiology.&amp;quot; International Society for Industrial Process Tomography, n.d. Web. 16 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.isipt.org/world-congress/3/269.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] Sherwood, Bruce A. &amp;quot;2.1 The Momentum Principle.&amp;quot; Matter &amp;amp; Interactions. By Ruth W. Chabay. 4th ed. Vol. 1. N.p.: John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons, 2015. 45-50. Print. Modern Mechanics.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurence12799</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=38619</id>
		<title>Electric Potential</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=38619"/>
		<updated>2020-03-24T19:40:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurence12799: /* A Mathematical Model */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039;, like all forms of potential energy, is the potential for work to be done, in this case by the electric force. The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; (frequently referred to as voltage, from its SI unit, the Volt) is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; associated with the test charge (1 Coulomb), such that it depends only on the source, just as the electric field is related to the electric force, but depends only on the source. One may similarly remember the parallel concept of the gravitational potential, which was gravitational potential energy divided by mass.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined with respect to the [[Electric Force]] &amp;amp; [[Electric Field]]:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} = - q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; from point b to point a&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the charge in the electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the source charge&#039;s electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a differential length along the path from point b to point a&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricPotentialPaths.png|400px|right|thumb|Some sets of electrically equivalent paths for a charge.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From this, the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; per test charge in the source charge&#039;s electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{U_{ab}}{q} = - \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The electric field is a &#039;&#039;conservative vector field&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:::This means that any path used in the above line integral will give the same value for the same beginning and end points (b and a). Looking at the figure to the right, many paths for a charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; subject to the electric field of source charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are shown. In each set of four paths (Green, Blue, Yellow, and Pink), the same amount of &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is gained or lost. &lt;br /&gt;
*A special case shown in dark green near the bottom right of the figure also exists:&lt;br /&gt;
:::If a charge is moving along a path that is always perpendicular to the electric field, the line integral will evaluate to zero, and therefore the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; will also evaluate to zero.&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is easily shown with the dot product; if two variable vectors are always perpendicular, then their dot product is always zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; between two point charges &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(Q \ \text{and} \ q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be written in a simpler expression:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \biggr ( \frac{1}{r_{a}} - \frac{1}{r_{b}} \biggr )&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the charge in the source&#039;s electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{a}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the final position &lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{b}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the initial position&lt;br /&gt;
:*The initial position is often taken to be infinity (the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined to be zero at infinity) creating a simpler and more familiar looking equation:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} r}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
:::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the distance between the source charge and the charge in the electric field&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
===Externals links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Main Idea ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electric potential energy, like all forms of potential energy, is the potential for work to be done, in this case by the electric force. The electric potential (frequently referred to as voltage, from its SI unit the Volt) is the electric potential energy associated with the test charge, such that it depends only on the source, just as the electric field is related to the electric force, but depends only on the source. One may similarly remember the parallel concept of the gravitational potential, which was gravitational potential energy divided by mass.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
====Electric Potential Energy====&lt;br /&gt;
Electric potential energy may be calculated in a variety of manners, depending upon the situation. The electric potential energy between two point charges may be written in a form which follows directly from the definition of the Coulomb force:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = \frac{qQ}{4\pi\epsilon_0 r_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is the amount of energy which would be required to bring one of the charged objects (by convention the small &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; q &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; charge) from an infinite distance to its current position, where, by convention, the potential energy at infinity is equal to zero. This may, therefore, be derived from the equation for work:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Derivation with Calculus=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -W = -\int_\infty^{r_0} \vec{F}_E(r) \cdot \text{d} \vec{r} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -\int_\infty^{r_0} \frac{qQ \hat{r}}{4\pi\epsilon_0 r^2} \cdot \text{d} \vec{r} = -\frac{qQ}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\int_\infty^{r_0} \frac{\hat{r} \cdot \hat{r}}{r^2} \text{d} r &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = \frac{qQ}{4\pi \epsilon_0} \biggr{(} \frac{1}{r} \biggr{|}_{\infty}^{r_0} = \frac{qQ}{4\pi \epsilon_0 r_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Given our definition of the [[Electric Field]], we have that &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vec{F}_E(r) = q\vec{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
so the electric potential energy may be generally written as &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -q\int_a^b \vec{E} \cdot \text{d} \vec{r} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Linear assumption=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the above equation, one can see that if the electric field is constant over the length of the path, then electric potential energy may be written in a simplified manner as&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = q\vec{E}\cdot\Delta \vec{s} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Electric Potential====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just as we divided by charge to go from electric force to electric field, dividing by charge takes us from the electric potential energy to the electric potential. For a test particle of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; q &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we define &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; V = \frac{U}{q} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Derivation with Calculus=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is not especially meaningful without choosing a reference point, just as for potential energy. Thus, one may speak of the potential difference between two points, which is independent of the reference value. From the above definition of electric potential energy, it is possible to derive an expression for the potential difference between two points from the electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\int_a^b \vec{E} \cdot \text{d} \vec{s} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The vectors are used to express the path associated with this integral. The difference in electric potential will be the same no matter what path one takes, as explored in [[Path Independence of Electric Potential]]. This also allows one to write the inverse relationship, determining the electric field at a given point from the electric potential in one and three dimensions respectively:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; E = -\frac{\text{d}V}{\text{d}x}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vec{E} = -\nabla V &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \nabla &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the gradient operator.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Linear Assumption=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The above equations allow us to write the equivalent expressions under an assumption of constant values for the electric field, such that the integral reduces to &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\vec{E} \cdot \Delta \vec{l} = -(E_x \Delta x + E_y \Delta y + E_z \Delta z)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This also leads directly to the inverse expression:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vec{E} = -(\frac{\Delta V_x}{\Delta x} + \frac{\Delta V_y}{\Delta y} + \frac{\Delta V_z}{\Delta z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric potential difference in a field which is nonuniform, but whose variations are discrete, is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\sum \vec{E}\cdot \Delta\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The different parts in this particular equation resembles the equation for the potential difference in an uniform field, except that with the nonuniform field, the potential difference in the different fields are summed up. This situation can be quite easy, but when the system gets difficult, first, choose a path and divide it into smaller pieces of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;; second, write an expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -\vec{E}\cdot\Delta\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of one piece; third, add up the contributions of all the pieces; last, check the result to make sure the magnitude, direction, and units make sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is important to keep track of the sign differences. If the path follows the direction of the electric field, the sign of the potential difference will be negative. This may be imagined as dropping a positive test charge in an electric field: a positive charge will be accelerated in the direction of the field, meaning that it is gaining energy, and so its potential must be decreasing. By contrast, if the path is opposite the direction of the field, potential will be increasing, much like rolling a boulder up a hill. If the path is perpendicular to the direction of the electric field, the dot product will be equal to zero. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, when working with different situations, it is nice to keep in mind that in a conductor, the electric field is zero. Therefore, the potential difference is zero as well. In an insulator, the electric field is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{E_{applied}}{K}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the dielectric constant. Furthermore, the potential difference over a round trip is equal to zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
Click on the link to see Electric Potential through VPython!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Make sure to press &amp;quot;Run&amp;quot; to see the principle in action!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://trinket.io/embed/glowscript/0a7e486c94 Teach hand-on with GlowScript]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Watch this video for a more visual approach! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Rb9guSEeVE Electric Potential: Visualizing Voltage with 3D animations]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--== Models ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric potential of a particle at a point is equal to the potential difference of that particle with respect to infinity. Since we know how to calculate the potential difference using the formula, we can see that this implies that the electric potential at infinity is equal to zero. What does this mean? This means that a particle that is extremely far away has no potential energy. This makes sense, because a proton will not be affected by the electric field of another proton at a distance of infinity apart. This subtle detail aids in solving a case of problems types later on.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although electric potential is an important topic to learn, most problems encountered will not ask to find just the &amp;quot;electric potential,&amp;quot; instead, questions will most likely ask for the &amp;quot;electric potential difference.&amp;quot; This is because electric potential is measured using different locations, or more specifically pathways between the different locations, so instead of determining the electric potential of location A and the electric potential of final location B, it would make more sense to determine the &amp;quot;difference in electric potential between locations A and B.&amp;quot; The following mathematical model will further explain this. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like mentioned before, instead of electric potential, in most cases, electric potential difference is needed to be found. The general equation for the potential difference is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{{U}_{electric}} = {q} * ∆{V} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{{U}_{electric}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric potential energy, which is measured in Joules (J). &#039;&#039;&#039;q&#039;&#039;&#039; is the charge of the particle moving through the path of the electric potential difference, which is measured in coulombs (C). &#039;&#039;&#039;∆V&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric potential difference, which is measured in Joules per Coulomb (J/C), or just Volts (V).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Aside from the general equation, the electric potential difference can also be found in other ways. The potential difference in an &#039;&#039;&#039;uniform field&#039;&#039;&#039; is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{V} = -({E}_{x}∆{x} + {E}_{y}∆{y} + {E}_{z}∆{z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;, which can also be written as &#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{V} = -\vec{E}·∆\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the electric potential difference, which is measured in Joules per Coulomb (J/C), or just Volts (V). &#039;&#039;&#039;E&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric field, which is measured in Newtons per Coulomb (N/C), and it is important to note that the different direction components of the electric field are used in the equation. &#039;&#039;&#039;l&#039;&#039;&#039; (or the &#039;&#039;&#039;x&#039;&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;&#039;y&#039;&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;&#039;z&#039;&#039;&#039;) is the distance between the two described locations, which is measured in meters, and x, y, and z, are the different components of the difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, when working with different situations, it is nice to keep in mind that in a conductor, the electric field is zero. Therefore, the potential difference is zero as well. In an insulator, the electric field is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;{E}_{applied} / K&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; where &#039;&#039;&#039;K&#039;&#039;&#039; is the dielectric constant. Also, the round trip potential difference is always zero, or in other words, if you start from a certain point and end at the same point, then, the potential difference will be zero. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
In a capacitor, the negative charges are located on the left plate, and the positive charges are located on the right plate. Location A is at the left end of the capacitor, and Location B is at the right end of the capacitor, or in other words, Location A and B are only different in terms of their x component location. The path moves from A to B. What is the direction of the electric field? Is the potential difference positive or negative? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ep125.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer: The electric field is to the left. The potential difference is increasing, or is positive.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
The electric field always moves away from the positive charge and towards the negative charge, which means the electric field in this example is to the left. Because the direction and the electric field and the direction of the path are opposite, the potential difference is increasing, or is positive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Calculate the change in electric potential between point A, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(-4, 3,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and B, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(2,-2,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; . The electric field in the location is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; (50,0,0) \; N/C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:EP mid fig.png ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer: -300V&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta\vec{l}= (2,-2,0)\;m - (-4,3,0)\;m = (6,-5,0)\;m &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -({E}_{x}∆{x} + {E}_{y}∆{y} + {E}_{z}∆{z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -(50\; N/C \cdot 6 \;m + 0 \; N/c \cdot -5 \; m + 0\cdot 0)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -300 V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Bohr Model]] of the hydrogen atom treats it as a nucleus of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; +e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; electrons of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; orbiting in circular orbits of specific radii. Calculate the potential difference between two points, one infinitely far away from the nucleus, and the other one Bohr radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; away from the nucleus (don&#039;t worry about substituting in the values). Compute the electric potential energy associated with the electron one Bohr radius away from the nucleus, setting the potential energy at infinity as zero (remember the sign of the charge). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We may compute the electric potential by taking integrating the electric field of a point charge as the radius goes from infinity to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. This integral may be set up as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\int_\infty^{a_0} \vec{E}\cdot\text{d}\vec{l} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \int_\infty^{a_0} \frac{\text{d} r}{r^2} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This may then be solved:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\biggr{(}\frac{1}{r}\biggr{|}_\infty^{a_0} = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
to compute the potential energy, we now multiply by the charge of the electron: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, giving &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -\frac{e^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Depending on what physics or chemistry courses you may have taken before, this may be recognizable as twice the ionization energy of the n=1 orbital. The factor of two is due to the fact that in the Bohr model, the kinetic energy will be exactly half of this potential energy, and will be positive so that the net result is still negative, but with half the magnitude. This understanding of the hydrogen atom gets certain values right, but the reality of the situation is far more complicated. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is this topic connected to something that you are interested in?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am interested in robotic systems and building circuit boards and electrical systems for manufacturing robots. While studying this section in the book, I was able to connect back many of the concepts and calculations back to robotics and the electrical component of automated systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Since high school, I never really understood how to work with the voltmeter and what it measured, and I have always wanted to know, but although this particular wiki page did not go into the details and other branches of electric potential, it led me to find the answers to something I was interested in since high school, the concept of electric potential.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I think electively is really interesting. When I was younger, I participated in this demo where a group of people hold hands and someone touches this special ball full of charge. We all could feel the tingling sensation of the current passing through us. It’s cool to learn the theory behind the supposed magic that occurs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I think it&#039;s very interesting that electric potential can be seen as a property of a space and that we can have further applications using this property.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is it connected to your major?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am a Mechanical Engineering major, so I will be dealing with the electrical components of machines when I work. Therefore, I have to know these certain concepts such as electric potential in order to fully understand how they work and interact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revistionist] As a biochemistry major, electric potential and electric potential difference is not particularly related to my major, but in chemistry classes, we use electrostatic potential maps (electrostatic potential energy maps) that shows the charge distributions throughout a molecule. Although the main use in electric potential is different in physics and biochemistry (where physicists use it identify the effect of the electric field at a location), I still found it interesting as the concept of electric potential (buildup) was being used in quite a different way. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I am a computer science major. Although I deal mostly with software, the hardware aspect is still important. The algorithms that I design run differently on different machines. The time complexity of an algorithm is sometimes useless when worrying about constant factors that are determined by a system’s hardware. Quicksort, for instance, is usually faster than many other sorts that have lower time complexities. The hardware of computers heavily relies on electricity and current (which is induced by a potential difference) to switch transistors on and off and thereby process information. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I am an aerospace engineering major, and I think understanding such concepts will help me have a better holistic understanding towards fields and systems. In addition, the thinking behind solving related problems will help me better prepared for future classes that involve with solving dynamics problems. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Is there an interesting industrial application?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] Electrical potential is used to find the voltage across a path. This is useful when working with circuit components and attempting to manipulate the power output or current throughout a component.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Electric potential sensors are being used to detect a variety of electrical signals made by the human body, thus contributing to the field of electrophysiology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] The study of electric potential has lead scientists to generate very safe wires that will not overheat and cause fires. Connecting circuits to ground is important and the third prong in an electrical outlet is this ground connection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The idea of electric potential, in a way, started with Ben Franklin and his experiments in the 1740s. He began to understand the flow of electricity, which eventually paved the path towards explaining electric potential and potential difference. Scientists finally began to understand how electric fields were actually affecting the charges and the surrounding environment. Benjamin Franklin first shocked himself in 1746, while conducting experiments on electricity with found objects from around his house. Six years later, or 261 years ago for us, the founding father flew a kite attached to a key and a silk ribbon in a thunderstorm and effectively trapped lightning in a jar. The experiment is now seen as a watershed moment in mankind&#039;s venture to channel a force of nature that was viewed quite abstractly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the time Franklin started experimenting with electricity, he&#039;d already found fame and fortune as the author of Poor Richard&#039;s Almanack. Electricity wasn&#039;t a very well understood phenomenon at that point, so Franklin&#039;s research proved to be fairly foundational. The early experiments, experts believe, were inspired by other scientists&#039; work and the shortcomings therein.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ep135.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
source: http://www.benjamin-franklin-history.org/kite-experiment/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That early brush with the dangers of electricity left an impression on Franklin. He described the sensation as &amp;quot;a universal blow throughout my whole body from head to foot, which seemed within as well as without; after which the first thing I took notice of was a violent quick shaking of my body.&amp;quot; However, it didn&#039;t scare him away. In the handful of years before his famous kite experiment, Franklin contributed everything from designing the first battery designs to establishing some common nomenclature in the study of electricity. Although Franklin is often coined the father of electricity, after he set the foundations of electricity, many other scientists contributed his or her research in the advancement of electricity and eventually led to the discovery of electric potential and potential difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like mentioned multiple times throughout the page, although electric potential is a huge and important topic, it has many branches, which makes the concept of electric potential difficult to stand alone. Even with this page, to support the concept of electric potential, many crucial branches of the topic appeared, like potential difference (which also branched into [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_Path_Independence,_claimed_by_Aditya_Mohile Potential Difference Path Independence]], [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_in_a_Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Uniform Field]], and [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_of_Point_Charge_in_a_Non-Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Nonuniform Field]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External Links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] https://www.khanacademy.org/test-prep/mcat/physical-processes/electrostatics-1/v/electric-potential-at-a-point-in-space&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pcWz4tP_zUw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vpa_uApmNoo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] https://www.khanacademy.org/science/electrical-engineering/ee-electrostatics/ee-fields-potential-voltage/a/ee-electric-potential-voltage&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] &amp;quot;Benjamin Franklin and Electricity.&amp;quot; Benjamin Franklin and Electricity. N.p., n.d. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.americaslibrary.gov/aa/franklinb/aa_franklinb_electric_1.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Bottyan, Thomas. &amp;quot;Electrostatic Potential Maps.&amp;quot; Chemwiki. N.p., 02 Oct. 2013. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://chemwiki.ucdavis.edu/Core/Theoretical_Chemistry/Chemical_Bonding/General_Principles_of_Chemical_Bonding/Electrostatic_Potential_maps&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] &amp;quot;Electric Potential Difference.&amp;quot; Electric Potential Difference. The Physics Classroom, n.d. Web. 14 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/circuits/Lesson-1/Electric-Potential-Difference&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] Harland, C. J., T. D. Clark, and R. J. Prance. &amp;quot;Applications of Electric Potential (Displacement Current) Sensors in Human Body Electrophysiology.&amp;quot; International Society for Industrial Process Tomography, n.d. Web. 16 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.isipt.org/world-congress/3/269.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] Sherwood, Bruce A. &amp;quot;2.1 The Momentum Principle.&amp;quot; Matter &amp;amp; Interactions. By Ruth W. Chabay. 4th ed. Vol. 1. N.p.: John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons, 2015. 45-50. Print. Modern Mechanics.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurence12799</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=38618</id>
		<title>Electric Potential</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=38618"/>
		<updated>2020-03-24T19:08:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurence12799: /* The Main Idea */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039;, like all forms of potential energy, is the potential for work to be done, in this case by the electric force. The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; (frequently referred to as voltage, from its SI unit, the Volt) is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; associated with the test charge (1 Coulomb), such that it depends only on the source, just as the electric field is related to the electric force, but depends only on the source. One may similarly remember the parallel concept of the gravitational potential, which was gravitational potential energy divided by mass.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined with respect to the [[Electric Force]] &amp;amp; [[Electric Field]]:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} = - q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; from point b to point a&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the charge in the electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the source charge&#039;s electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a differential length along the path from point b to point a&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricPotentialPaths.png|400px|right|thumb|Some sets of electrically equivalent paths for a charge.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From this, the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; per test charge in the source charge&#039;s electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{U_{ab}}{q} = - \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The electric field is a &#039;&#039;conservative vector field&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:::This means that any path used in the above line integral will give the same value for the same beginning and end points (b and a). Looking at the figure to the right, many paths for a charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; subject to the electric field of source charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are shown. In each set of four paths (Green, Blue, Yellow, and Pink), the same amount of &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is gained or lost. &lt;br /&gt;
*A special case shown in dark green near the bottom right of the figure also exists:&lt;br /&gt;
:::If a charge is moving along a path that is always perpendicular to the electric field, the line integral will evaluate to zero, and therefore the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; will also evaluate to zero.&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is easily shown with the dot product; if two variable vectors are always perpendicular, then their dot product is always zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
===Externals links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Main Idea ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electric potential energy, like all forms of potential energy, is the potential for work to be done, in this case by the electric force. The electric potential (frequently referred to as voltage, from its SI unit the Volt) is the electric potential energy associated with the test charge, such that it depends only on the source, just as the electric field is related to the electric force, but depends only on the source. One may similarly remember the parallel concept of the gravitational potential, which was gravitational potential energy divided by mass.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
====Electric Potential Energy====&lt;br /&gt;
Electric potential energy may be calculated in a variety of manners, depending upon the situation. The electric potential energy between two point charges may be written in a form which follows directly from the definition of the Coulomb force:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = \frac{qQ}{4\pi\epsilon_0 r_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is the amount of energy which would be required to bring one of the charged objects (by convention the small &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; q &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; charge) from an infinite distance to its current position, where, by convention, the potential energy at infinity is equal to zero. This may, therefore, be derived from the equation for work:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Derivation with Calculus=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -W = -\int_\infty^{r_0} \vec{F}_E(r) \cdot \text{d} \vec{r} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -\int_\infty^{r_0} \frac{qQ \hat{r}}{4\pi\epsilon_0 r^2} \cdot \text{d} \vec{r} = -\frac{qQ}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\int_\infty^{r_0} \frac{\hat{r} \cdot \hat{r}}{r^2} \text{d} r &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = \frac{qQ}{4\pi \epsilon_0} \biggr{(} \frac{1}{r} \biggr{|}_{\infty}^{r_0} = \frac{qQ}{4\pi \epsilon_0 r_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Given our definition of the [[Electric Field]], we have that &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vec{F}_E(r) = q\vec{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
so the electric potential energy may be generally written as &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -q\int_a^b \vec{E} \cdot \text{d} \vec{r} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Linear assumption=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the above equation, one can see that if the electric field is constant over the length of the path, then electric potential energy may be written in a simplified manner as&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = q\vec{E}\cdot\Delta \vec{s} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Electric Potential====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just as we divided by charge to go from electric force to electric field, dividing by charge takes us from the electric potential energy to the electric potential. For a test particle of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; q &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we define &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; V = \frac{U}{q} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Derivation with Calculus=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is not especially meaningful without choosing a reference point, just as for potential energy. Thus, one may speak of the potential difference between two points, which is independent of the reference value. From the above definition of electric potential energy, it is possible to derive an expression for the potential difference between two points from the electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\int_a^b \vec{E} \cdot \text{d} \vec{s} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The vectors are used to express the path associated with this integral. The difference in electric potential will be the same no matter what path one takes, as explored in [[Path Independence of Electric Potential]]. This also allows one to write the inverse relationship, determining the electric field at a given point from the electric potential in one and three dimensions respectively:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; E = -\frac{\text{d}V}{\text{d}x}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vec{E} = -\nabla V &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \nabla &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the gradient operator.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Linear Assumption=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The above equations allow us to write the equivalent expressions under an assumption of constant values for the electric field, such that the integral reduces to &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\vec{E} \cdot \Delta \vec{l} = -(E_x \Delta x + E_y \Delta y + E_z \Delta z)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This also leads directly to the inverse expression:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vec{E} = -(\frac{\Delta V_x}{\Delta x} + \frac{\Delta V_y}{\Delta y} + \frac{\Delta V_z}{\Delta z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric potential difference in a field which is nonuniform, but whose variations are discrete, is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\sum \vec{E}\cdot \Delta\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The different parts in this particular equation resembles the equation for the potential difference in an uniform field, except that with the nonuniform field, the potential difference in the different fields are summed up. This situation can be quite easy, but when the system gets difficult, first, choose a path and divide it into smaller pieces of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;; second, write an expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -\vec{E}\cdot\Delta\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of one piece; third, add up the contributions of all the pieces; last, check the result to make sure the magnitude, direction, and units make sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is important to keep track of the sign differences. If the path follows the direction of the electric field, the sign of the potential difference will be negative. This may be imagined as dropping a positive test charge in an electric field: a positive charge will be accelerated in the direction of the field, meaning that it is gaining energy, and so its potential must be decreasing. By contrast, if the path is opposite the direction of the field, potential will be increasing, much like rolling a boulder up a hill. If the path is perpendicular to the direction of the electric field, the dot product will be equal to zero. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, when working with different situations, it is nice to keep in mind that in a conductor, the electric field is zero. Therefore, the potential difference is zero as well. In an insulator, the electric field is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{E_{applied}}{K}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the dielectric constant. Furthermore, the potential difference over a round trip is equal to zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
Click on the link to see Electric Potential through VPython!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Make sure to press &amp;quot;Run&amp;quot; to see the principle in action!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://trinket.io/embed/glowscript/0a7e486c94 Teach hand-on with GlowScript]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Watch this video for a more visual approach! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Rb9guSEeVE Electric Potential: Visualizing Voltage with 3D animations]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--== Models ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric potential of a particle at a point is equal to the potential difference of that particle with respect to infinity. Since we know how to calculate the potential difference using the formula, we can see that this implies that the electric potential at infinity is equal to zero. What does this mean? This means that a particle that is extremely far away has no potential energy. This makes sense, because a proton will not be affected by the electric field of another proton at a distance of infinity apart. This subtle detail aids in solving a case of problems types later on.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although electric potential is an important topic to learn, most problems encountered will not ask to find just the &amp;quot;electric potential,&amp;quot; instead, questions will most likely ask for the &amp;quot;electric potential difference.&amp;quot; This is because electric potential is measured using different locations, or more specifically pathways between the different locations, so instead of determining the electric potential of location A and the electric potential of final location B, it would make more sense to determine the &amp;quot;difference in electric potential between locations A and B.&amp;quot; The following mathematical model will further explain this. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like mentioned before, instead of electric potential, in most cases, electric potential difference is needed to be found. The general equation for the potential difference is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{{U}_{electric}} = {q} * ∆{V} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{{U}_{electric}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric potential energy, which is measured in Joules (J). &#039;&#039;&#039;q&#039;&#039;&#039; is the charge of the particle moving through the path of the electric potential difference, which is measured in coulombs (C). &#039;&#039;&#039;∆V&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric potential difference, which is measured in Joules per Coulomb (J/C), or just Volts (V).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Aside from the general equation, the electric potential difference can also be found in other ways. The potential difference in an &#039;&#039;&#039;uniform field&#039;&#039;&#039; is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{V} = -({E}_{x}∆{x} + {E}_{y}∆{y} + {E}_{z}∆{z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;, which can also be written as &#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{V} = -\vec{E}·∆\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the electric potential difference, which is measured in Joules per Coulomb (J/C), or just Volts (V). &#039;&#039;&#039;E&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric field, which is measured in Newtons per Coulomb (N/C), and it is important to note that the different direction components of the electric field are used in the equation. &#039;&#039;&#039;l&#039;&#039;&#039; (or the &#039;&#039;&#039;x&#039;&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;&#039;y&#039;&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;&#039;z&#039;&#039;&#039;) is the distance between the two described locations, which is measured in meters, and x, y, and z, are the different components of the difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, when working with different situations, it is nice to keep in mind that in a conductor, the electric field is zero. Therefore, the potential difference is zero as well. In an insulator, the electric field is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;{E}_{applied} / K&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; where &#039;&#039;&#039;K&#039;&#039;&#039; is the dielectric constant. Also, the round trip potential difference is always zero, or in other words, if you start from a certain point and end at the same point, then, the potential difference will be zero. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
In a capacitor, the negative charges are located on the left plate, and the positive charges are located on the right plate. Location A is at the left end of the capacitor, and Location B is at the right end of the capacitor, or in other words, Location A and B are only different in terms of their x component location. The path moves from A to B. What is the direction of the electric field? Is the potential difference positive or negative? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ep125.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer: The electric field is to the left. The potential difference is increasing, or is positive.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
The electric field always moves away from the positive charge and towards the negative charge, which means the electric field in this example is to the left. Because the direction and the electric field and the direction of the path are opposite, the potential difference is increasing, or is positive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Calculate the change in electric potential between point A, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(-4, 3,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and B, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(2,-2,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; . The electric field in the location is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; (50,0,0) \; N/C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:EP mid fig.png ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer: -300V&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta\vec{l}= (2,-2,0)\;m - (-4,3,0)\;m = (6,-5,0)\;m &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -({E}_{x}∆{x} + {E}_{y}∆{y} + {E}_{z}∆{z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -(50\; N/C \cdot 6 \;m + 0 \; N/c \cdot -5 \; m + 0\cdot 0)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -300 V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Bohr Model]] of the hydrogen atom treats it as a nucleus of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; +e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; electrons of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; orbiting in circular orbits of specific radii. Calculate the potential difference between two points, one infinitely far away from the nucleus, and the other one Bohr radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; away from the nucleus (don&#039;t worry about substituting in the values). Compute the electric potential energy associated with the electron one Bohr radius away from the nucleus, setting the potential energy at infinity as zero (remember the sign of the charge). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We may compute the electric potential by taking integrating the electric field of a point charge as the radius goes from infinity to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. This integral may be set up as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\int_\infty^{a_0} \vec{E}\cdot\text{d}\vec{l} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \int_\infty^{a_0} \frac{\text{d} r}{r^2} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This may then be solved:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\biggr{(}\frac{1}{r}\biggr{|}_\infty^{a_0} = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
to compute the potential energy, we now multiply by the charge of the electron: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, giving &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -\frac{e^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Depending on what physics or chemistry courses you may have taken before, this may be recognizable as twice the ionization energy of the n=1 orbital. The factor of two is due to the fact that in the Bohr model, the kinetic energy will be exactly half of this potential energy, and will be positive so that the net result is still negative, but with half the magnitude. This understanding of the hydrogen atom gets certain values right, but the reality of the situation is far more complicated. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is this topic connected to something that you are interested in?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am interested in robotic systems and building circuit boards and electrical systems for manufacturing robots. While studying this section in the book, I was able to connect back many of the concepts and calculations back to robotics and the electrical component of automated systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Since high school, I never really understood how to work with the voltmeter and what it measured, and I have always wanted to know, but although this particular wiki page did not go into the details and other branches of electric potential, it led me to find the answers to something I was interested in since high school, the concept of electric potential.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I think electively is really interesting. When I was younger, I participated in this demo where a group of people hold hands and someone touches this special ball full of charge. We all could feel the tingling sensation of the current passing through us. It’s cool to learn the theory behind the supposed magic that occurs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I think it&#039;s very interesting that electric potential can be seen as a property of a space and that we can have further applications using this property.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is it connected to your major?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am a Mechanical Engineering major, so I will be dealing with the electrical components of machines when I work. Therefore, I have to know these certain concepts such as electric potential in order to fully understand how they work and interact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revistionist] As a biochemistry major, electric potential and electric potential difference is not particularly related to my major, but in chemistry classes, we use electrostatic potential maps (electrostatic potential energy maps) that shows the charge distributions throughout a molecule. Although the main use in electric potential is different in physics and biochemistry (where physicists use it identify the effect of the electric field at a location), I still found it interesting as the concept of electric potential (buildup) was being used in quite a different way. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I am a computer science major. Although I deal mostly with software, the hardware aspect is still important. The algorithms that I design run differently on different machines. The time complexity of an algorithm is sometimes useless when worrying about constant factors that are determined by a system’s hardware. Quicksort, for instance, is usually faster than many other sorts that have lower time complexities. The hardware of computers heavily relies on electricity and current (which is induced by a potential difference) to switch transistors on and off and thereby process information. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I am an aerospace engineering major, and I think understanding such concepts will help me have a better holistic understanding towards fields and systems. In addition, the thinking behind solving related problems will help me better prepared for future classes that involve with solving dynamics problems. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Is there an interesting industrial application?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] Electrical potential is used to find the voltage across a path. This is useful when working with circuit components and attempting to manipulate the power output or current throughout a component.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Electric potential sensors are being used to detect a variety of electrical signals made by the human body, thus contributing to the field of electrophysiology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] The study of electric potential has lead scientists to generate very safe wires that will not overheat and cause fires. Connecting circuits to ground is important and the third prong in an electrical outlet is this ground connection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The idea of electric potential, in a way, started with Ben Franklin and his experiments in the 1740s. He began to understand the flow of electricity, which eventually paved the path towards explaining electric potential and potential difference. Scientists finally began to understand how electric fields were actually affecting the charges and the surrounding environment. Benjamin Franklin first shocked himself in 1746, while conducting experiments on electricity with found objects from around his house. Six years later, or 261 years ago for us, the founding father flew a kite attached to a key and a silk ribbon in a thunderstorm and effectively trapped lightning in a jar. The experiment is now seen as a watershed moment in mankind&#039;s venture to channel a force of nature that was viewed quite abstractly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the time Franklin started experimenting with electricity, he&#039;d already found fame and fortune as the author of Poor Richard&#039;s Almanack. Electricity wasn&#039;t a very well understood phenomenon at that point, so Franklin&#039;s research proved to be fairly foundational. The early experiments, experts believe, were inspired by other scientists&#039; work and the shortcomings therein.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ep135.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
source: http://www.benjamin-franklin-history.org/kite-experiment/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That early brush with the dangers of electricity left an impression on Franklin. He described the sensation as &amp;quot;a universal blow throughout my whole body from head to foot, which seemed within as well as without; after which the first thing I took notice of was a violent quick shaking of my body.&amp;quot; However, it didn&#039;t scare him away. In the handful of years before his famous kite experiment, Franklin contributed everything from designing the first battery designs to establishing some common nomenclature in the study of electricity. Although Franklin is often coined the father of electricity, after he set the foundations of electricity, many other scientists contributed his or her research in the advancement of electricity and eventually led to the discovery of electric potential and potential difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like mentioned multiple times throughout the page, although electric potential is a huge and important topic, it has many branches, which makes the concept of electric potential difficult to stand alone. Even with this page, to support the concept of electric potential, many crucial branches of the topic appeared, like potential difference (which also branched into [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_Path_Independence,_claimed_by_Aditya_Mohile Potential Difference Path Independence]], [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_in_a_Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Uniform Field]], and [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_of_Point_Charge_in_a_Non-Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Nonuniform Field]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External Links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] https://www.khanacademy.org/test-prep/mcat/physical-processes/electrostatics-1/v/electric-potential-at-a-point-in-space&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pcWz4tP_zUw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vpa_uApmNoo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] https://www.khanacademy.org/science/electrical-engineering/ee-electrostatics/ee-fields-potential-voltage/a/ee-electric-potential-voltage&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] &amp;quot;Benjamin Franklin and Electricity.&amp;quot; Benjamin Franklin and Electricity. N.p., n.d. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.americaslibrary.gov/aa/franklinb/aa_franklinb_electric_1.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Bottyan, Thomas. &amp;quot;Electrostatic Potential Maps.&amp;quot; Chemwiki. N.p., 02 Oct. 2013. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://chemwiki.ucdavis.edu/Core/Theoretical_Chemistry/Chemical_Bonding/General_Principles_of_Chemical_Bonding/Electrostatic_Potential_maps&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] &amp;quot;Electric Potential Difference.&amp;quot; Electric Potential Difference. The Physics Classroom, n.d. Web. 14 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/circuits/Lesson-1/Electric-Potential-Difference&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] Harland, C. J., T. D. Clark, and R. J. Prance. &amp;quot;Applications of Electric Potential (Displacement Current) Sensors in Human Body Electrophysiology.&amp;quot; International Society for Industrial Process Tomography, n.d. Web. 16 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.isipt.org/world-congress/3/269.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] Sherwood, Bruce A. &amp;quot;2.1 The Momentum Principle.&amp;quot; Matter &amp;amp; Interactions. By Ruth W. Chabay. 4th ed. Vol. 1. N.p.: John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons, 2015. 45-50. Print. Modern Mechanics.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurence12799</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=38617</id>
		<title>Electric Potential</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=38617"/>
		<updated>2020-03-24T19:07:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurence12799: /* A Mathematical Model */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039;, like all forms of potential energy, is the potential for work to be done, in this case by the electric force. The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; (frequently referred to as voltage, from its SI unit, the Volt) is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; associated with the test charge (1 Coulomb), such that it depends only on the source, just as the electric field is related to the electric force, but depends only on the source. One may similarly remember the parallel concept of the gravitational potential, which was gravitational potential energy divided by mass.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined with respect to the [[Electric Force]] &amp;amp; [[Electric Field]]:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} = - q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; from point b to point a&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the charge in the electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the source charge&#039;s electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a differential length along the path from point b to point a&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From this, the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; per test charge in the source charge&#039;s electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{U_{ab}}{q} = - \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricPotentialPaths.png|400px|right|thumb|Some sets of electrically equivalent paths for a charge.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The electric field is a &#039;&#039;conservative vector field&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:::This means that any path used in the above line integral will give the same value for the same beginning and end points (b and a). Looking at the figure to the right, many paths for a charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; subject to the electric field of source charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are shown. In each set of four paths (Green, Blue, Yellow, and Pink), the same amount of &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is gained or lost. &lt;br /&gt;
*A special case shown in dark green near the bottom right of the figure also exists:&lt;br /&gt;
:::If a charge is moving along a path that is always perpendicular to the electric field, the line integral will evaluate to zero, and therefore the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; will also evaluate to zero.&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is easily shown with the dot product; if two variable vectors are always perpendicular, then their dot product is always zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
===Externals links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Main Idea ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electric potential energy, like all forms of potential energy, is the potential for work to be done, in this case by the electric force. The electric potential (frequently referred to as voltage, from its SI unit the Volt) is the electric potential energy associated with the test charge, such that it depends only on the source, just as the electric field is related to the electric force, but depends only on the source. One may similarly remember the parallel concept of the gravitational potential, which was gravitational potential energy divided by mass.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
====Electric Potential Energy====&lt;br /&gt;
Electric potential energy may be calculated in a variety of manners, depending upon the situation. The electric potential energy between two point charges may be written in a form which follows directly from the definition of the Coulomb force:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = \frac{qQ}{4\pi\epsilon_0 r_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is the amount of energy which would be required to bring one of the charged objects (by convention the small &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; q &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; charge) from an infinite distance to its current position, where, by convention, the potential energy at infinity is equal to zero. This may, therefore, be derived from the equation for work:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Derivation with Calculus=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -W = -\int_\infty^{r_0} \vec{F}_E(r) \cdot \text{d} \vec{r} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -\int_\infty^{r_0} \frac{qQ \hat{r}}{4\pi\epsilon_0 r^2} \cdot \text{d} \vec{r} = -\frac{qQ}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\int_\infty^{r_0} \frac{\hat{r} \cdot \hat{r}}{r^2} \text{d} r &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = \frac{qQ}{4\pi \epsilon_0} \biggr{(} \frac{1}{r} \biggr{|}_{\infty}^{r_0} = \frac{qQ}{4\pi \epsilon_0 r_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Given our definition of the [[Electric Field]], we have that &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vec{F}_E(r) = q\vec{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
so the electric potential energy may be generally written as &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -q\int_a^b \vec{E} \cdot \text{d} \vec{r} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Linear assumption=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the above equation, one can see that if the electric field is constant over the length of the path, then electric potential energy may be written in a simplified manner as&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = q\vec{E}\cdot\Delta \vec{s} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Electric Potential====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just as we divided by charge to go from electric force to electric field, dividing by charge takes us from the electric potential energy to the electric potential. For a test particle of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; q &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we define &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; V = \frac{U}{q} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Derivation with Calculus=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is not especially meaningful without choosing a reference point, just as for potential energy. Thus, one may speak of the potential difference between two points, which is independent of the reference value. From the above definition of electric potential energy, it is possible to derive an expression for the potential difference between two points from the electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\int_a^b \vec{E} \cdot \text{d} \vec{s} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The vectors are used to express the path associated with this integral. The difference in electric potential will be the same no matter what path one takes, as explored in [[Path Independence of Electric Potential]]. This also allows one to write the inverse relationship, determining the electric field at a given point from the electric potential in one and three dimensions respectively:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; E = -\frac{\text{d}V}{\text{d}x}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vec{E} = -\nabla V &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \nabla &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the gradient operator.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Linear Assumption=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The above equations allow us to write the equivalent expressions under an assumption of constant values for the electric field, such that the integral reduces to &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\vec{E} \cdot \Delta \vec{l} = -(E_x \Delta x + E_y \Delta y + E_z \Delta z)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This also leads directly to the inverse expression:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vec{E} = -(\frac{\Delta V_x}{\Delta x} + \frac{\Delta V_y}{\Delta y} + \frac{\Delta V_z}{\Delta z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric potential difference in a field which is nonuniform, but whose variations are discrete, is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\sum \vec{E}\cdot \Delta\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The different parts in this particular equation resembles the equation for the potential difference in an uniform field, except that with the nonuniform field, the potential difference in the different fields are summed up. This situation can be quite easy, but when the system gets difficult, first, choose a path and divide it into smaller pieces of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;; second, write an expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -\vec{E}\cdot\Delta\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of one piece; third, add up the contributions of all the pieces; last, check the result to make sure the magnitude, direction, and units make sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is important to keep track of the sign differences. If the path follows the direction of the electric field, the sign of the potential difference will be negative. This may be imagined as dropping a positive test charge in an electric field: a positive charge will be accelerated in the direction of the field, meaning that it is gaining energy, and so its potential must be decreasing. By contrast, if the path is opposite the direction of the field, potential will be increasing, much like rolling a boulder up a hill. If the path is perpendicular to the direction of the electric field, the dot product will be equal to zero. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, when working with different situations, it is nice to keep in mind that in a conductor, the electric field is zero. Therefore, the potential difference is zero as well. In an insulator, the electric field is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{E_{applied}}{K}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the dielectric constant. Furthermore, the potential difference over a round trip is equal to zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
Click on the link to see Electric Potential through VPython!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Make sure to press &amp;quot;Run&amp;quot; to see the principle in action!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://trinket.io/embed/glowscript/0a7e486c94 Teach hand-on with GlowScript]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Watch this video for a more visual approach! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Rb9guSEeVE Electric Potential: Visualizing Voltage with 3D animations]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--== Models ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric potential of a particle at a point is equal to the potential difference of that particle with respect to infinity. Since we know how to calculate the potential difference using the formula, we can see that this implies that the electric potential at infinity is equal to zero. What does this mean? This means that a particle that is extremely far away has no potential energy. This makes sense, because a proton will not be affected by the electric field of another proton at a distance of infinity apart. This subtle detail aids in solving a case of problems types later on.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although electric potential is an important topic to learn, most problems encountered will not ask to find just the &amp;quot;electric potential,&amp;quot; instead, questions will most likely ask for the &amp;quot;electric potential difference.&amp;quot; This is because electric potential is measured using different locations, or more specifically pathways between the different locations, so instead of determining the electric potential of location A and the electric potential of final location B, it would make more sense to determine the &amp;quot;difference in electric potential between locations A and B.&amp;quot; The following mathematical model will further explain this. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like mentioned before, instead of electric potential, in most cases, electric potential difference is needed to be found. The general equation for the potential difference is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{{U}_{electric}} = {q} * ∆{V} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{{U}_{electric}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric potential energy, which is measured in Joules (J). &#039;&#039;&#039;q&#039;&#039;&#039; is the charge of the particle moving through the path of the electric potential difference, which is measured in coulombs (C). &#039;&#039;&#039;∆V&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric potential difference, which is measured in Joules per Coulomb (J/C), or just Volts (V).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Aside from the general equation, the electric potential difference can also be found in other ways. The potential difference in an &#039;&#039;&#039;uniform field&#039;&#039;&#039; is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{V} = -({E}_{x}∆{x} + {E}_{y}∆{y} + {E}_{z}∆{z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;, which can also be written as &#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{V} = -\vec{E}·∆\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the electric potential difference, which is measured in Joules per Coulomb (J/C), or just Volts (V). &#039;&#039;&#039;E&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric field, which is measured in Newtons per Coulomb (N/C), and it is important to note that the different direction components of the electric field are used in the equation. &#039;&#039;&#039;l&#039;&#039;&#039; (or the &#039;&#039;&#039;x&#039;&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;&#039;y&#039;&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;&#039;z&#039;&#039;&#039;) is the distance between the two described locations, which is measured in meters, and x, y, and z, are the different components of the difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, when working with different situations, it is nice to keep in mind that in a conductor, the electric field is zero. Therefore, the potential difference is zero as well. In an insulator, the electric field is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;{E}_{applied} / K&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; where &#039;&#039;&#039;K&#039;&#039;&#039; is the dielectric constant. Also, the round trip potential difference is always zero, or in other words, if you start from a certain point and end at the same point, then, the potential difference will be zero. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
In a capacitor, the negative charges are located on the left plate, and the positive charges are located on the right plate. Location A is at the left end of the capacitor, and Location B is at the right end of the capacitor, or in other words, Location A and B are only different in terms of their x component location. The path moves from A to B. What is the direction of the electric field? Is the potential difference positive or negative? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ep125.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer: The electric field is to the left. The potential difference is increasing, or is positive.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
The electric field always moves away from the positive charge and towards the negative charge, which means the electric field in this example is to the left. Because the direction and the electric field and the direction of the path are opposite, the potential difference is increasing, or is positive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Calculate the change in electric potential between point A, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(-4, 3,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and B, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(2,-2,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; . The electric field in the location is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; (50,0,0) \; N/C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:EP mid fig.png ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer: -300V&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta\vec{l}= (2,-2,0)\;m - (-4,3,0)\;m = (6,-5,0)\;m &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -({E}_{x}∆{x} + {E}_{y}∆{y} + {E}_{z}∆{z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -(50\; N/C \cdot 6 \;m + 0 \; N/c \cdot -5 \; m + 0\cdot 0)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -300 V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Bohr Model]] of the hydrogen atom treats it as a nucleus of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; +e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; electrons of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; orbiting in circular orbits of specific radii. Calculate the potential difference between two points, one infinitely far away from the nucleus, and the other one Bohr radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; away from the nucleus (don&#039;t worry about substituting in the values). Compute the electric potential energy associated with the electron one Bohr radius away from the nucleus, setting the potential energy at infinity as zero (remember the sign of the charge). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We may compute the electric potential by taking integrating the electric field of a point charge as the radius goes from infinity to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. This integral may be set up as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\int_\infty^{a_0} \vec{E}\cdot\text{d}\vec{l} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \int_\infty^{a_0} \frac{\text{d} r}{r^2} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This may then be solved:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\biggr{(}\frac{1}{r}\biggr{|}_\infty^{a_0} = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
to compute the potential energy, we now multiply by the charge of the electron: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, giving &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -\frac{e^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Depending on what physics or chemistry courses you may have taken before, this may be recognizable as twice the ionization energy of the n=1 orbital. The factor of two is due to the fact that in the Bohr model, the kinetic energy will be exactly half of this potential energy, and will be positive so that the net result is still negative, but with half the magnitude. This understanding of the hydrogen atom gets certain values right, but the reality of the situation is far more complicated. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is this topic connected to something that you are interested in?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am interested in robotic systems and building circuit boards and electrical systems for manufacturing robots. While studying this section in the book, I was able to connect back many of the concepts and calculations back to robotics and the electrical component of automated systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Since high school, I never really understood how to work with the voltmeter and what it measured, and I have always wanted to know, but although this particular wiki page did not go into the details and other branches of electric potential, it led me to find the answers to something I was interested in since high school, the concept of electric potential.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I think electively is really interesting. When I was younger, I participated in this demo where a group of people hold hands and someone touches this special ball full of charge. We all could feel the tingling sensation of the current passing through us. It’s cool to learn the theory behind the supposed magic that occurs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I think it&#039;s very interesting that electric potential can be seen as a property of a space and that we can have further applications using this property.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is it connected to your major?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am a Mechanical Engineering major, so I will be dealing with the electrical components of machines when I work. Therefore, I have to know these certain concepts such as electric potential in order to fully understand how they work and interact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revistionist] As a biochemistry major, electric potential and electric potential difference is not particularly related to my major, but in chemistry classes, we use electrostatic potential maps (electrostatic potential energy maps) that shows the charge distributions throughout a molecule. Although the main use in electric potential is different in physics and biochemistry (where physicists use it identify the effect of the electric field at a location), I still found it interesting as the concept of electric potential (buildup) was being used in quite a different way. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I am a computer science major. Although I deal mostly with software, the hardware aspect is still important. The algorithms that I design run differently on different machines. The time complexity of an algorithm is sometimes useless when worrying about constant factors that are determined by a system’s hardware. Quicksort, for instance, is usually faster than many other sorts that have lower time complexities. The hardware of computers heavily relies on electricity and current (which is induced by a potential difference) to switch transistors on and off and thereby process information. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I am an aerospace engineering major, and I think understanding such concepts will help me have a better holistic understanding towards fields and systems. In addition, the thinking behind solving related problems will help me better prepared for future classes that involve with solving dynamics problems. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Is there an interesting industrial application?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] Electrical potential is used to find the voltage across a path. This is useful when working with circuit components and attempting to manipulate the power output or current throughout a component.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Electric potential sensors are being used to detect a variety of electrical signals made by the human body, thus contributing to the field of electrophysiology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] The study of electric potential has lead scientists to generate very safe wires that will not overheat and cause fires. Connecting circuits to ground is important and the third prong in an electrical outlet is this ground connection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The idea of electric potential, in a way, started with Ben Franklin and his experiments in the 1740s. He began to understand the flow of electricity, which eventually paved the path towards explaining electric potential and potential difference. Scientists finally began to understand how electric fields were actually affecting the charges and the surrounding environment. Benjamin Franklin first shocked himself in 1746, while conducting experiments on electricity with found objects from around his house. Six years later, or 261 years ago for us, the founding father flew a kite attached to a key and a silk ribbon in a thunderstorm and effectively trapped lightning in a jar. The experiment is now seen as a watershed moment in mankind&#039;s venture to channel a force of nature that was viewed quite abstractly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the time Franklin started experimenting with electricity, he&#039;d already found fame and fortune as the author of Poor Richard&#039;s Almanack. Electricity wasn&#039;t a very well understood phenomenon at that point, so Franklin&#039;s research proved to be fairly foundational. The early experiments, experts believe, were inspired by other scientists&#039; work and the shortcomings therein.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ep135.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
source: http://www.benjamin-franklin-history.org/kite-experiment/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That early brush with the dangers of electricity left an impression on Franklin. He described the sensation as &amp;quot;a universal blow throughout my whole body from head to foot, which seemed within as well as without; after which the first thing I took notice of was a violent quick shaking of my body.&amp;quot; However, it didn&#039;t scare him away. In the handful of years before his famous kite experiment, Franklin contributed everything from designing the first battery designs to establishing some common nomenclature in the study of electricity. Although Franklin is often coined the father of electricity, after he set the foundations of electricity, many other scientists contributed his or her research in the advancement of electricity and eventually led to the discovery of electric potential and potential difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like mentioned multiple times throughout the page, although electric potential is a huge and important topic, it has many branches, which makes the concept of electric potential difficult to stand alone. Even with this page, to support the concept of electric potential, many crucial branches of the topic appeared, like potential difference (which also branched into [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_Path_Independence,_claimed_by_Aditya_Mohile Potential Difference Path Independence]], [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_in_a_Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Uniform Field]], and [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_of_Point_Charge_in_a_Non-Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Nonuniform Field]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External Links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] https://www.khanacademy.org/test-prep/mcat/physical-processes/electrostatics-1/v/electric-potential-at-a-point-in-space&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pcWz4tP_zUw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vpa_uApmNoo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] https://www.khanacademy.org/science/electrical-engineering/ee-electrostatics/ee-fields-potential-voltage/a/ee-electric-potential-voltage&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] &amp;quot;Benjamin Franklin and Electricity.&amp;quot; Benjamin Franklin and Electricity. N.p., n.d. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.americaslibrary.gov/aa/franklinb/aa_franklinb_electric_1.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Bottyan, Thomas. &amp;quot;Electrostatic Potential Maps.&amp;quot; Chemwiki. N.p., 02 Oct. 2013. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://chemwiki.ucdavis.edu/Core/Theoretical_Chemistry/Chemical_Bonding/General_Principles_of_Chemical_Bonding/Electrostatic_Potential_maps&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] &amp;quot;Electric Potential Difference.&amp;quot; Electric Potential Difference. The Physics Classroom, n.d. Web. 14 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/circuits/Lesson-1/Electric-Potential-Difference&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] Harland, C. J., T. D. Clark, and R. J. Prance. &amp;quot;Applications of Electric Potential (Displacement Current) Sensors in Human Body Electrophysiology.&amp;quot; International Society for Industrial Process Tomography, n.d. Web. 16 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.isipt.org/world-congress/3/269.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] Sherwood, Bruce A. &amp;quot;2.1 The Momentum Principle.&amp;quot; Matter &amp;amp; Interactions. By Ruth W. Chabay. 4th ed. Vol. 1. N.p.: John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons, 2015. 45-50. Print. Modern Mechanics.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurence12799</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=38616</id>
		<title>Electric Potential</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=38616"/>
		<updated>2020-03-24T19:06:00Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurence12799: /* The Main Idea */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039;, like all forms of potential energy, is the potential for work to be done, in this case by the electric force. The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; (frequently referred to as voltage, from its SI unit, the Volt) is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; associated with the test charge (1 Coulomb), such that it depends only on the source, just as the electric field is related to the electric force, but depends only on the source. One may similarly remember the parallel concept of the gravitational potential, which was gravitational potential energy divided by mass.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined with respect to the [[Electric Force]] &amp;amp; [[Electric Field]]:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} = - q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; from point b to point a&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the charge in the electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the source charge&#039;s electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a differential length along the path from point b to point a&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From this, the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; per test charge in the source charge&#039;s electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{U_{ab}}{q} = - \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricPotentialPaths.png|400px|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The electric field is a &#039;&#039;conservative vector field&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:::This means that any path used in the above line integral will give the same value for the same beginning and end points (b and a). Looking at the figure to the right, many paths for a charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; subject to the electric field of source charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are shown. In each set of four paths (Green, Blue, Yellow, and Pink), the same amount of &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is gained or lost. &lt;br /&gt;
*A special case shown in dark green near the bottom right of the figure also exists:&lt;br /&gt;
:::If a charge is moving along a path that is always perpendicular to the electric field, the line integral will evaluate to zero, and therefore the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; will also evaluate to zero.&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is easily shown with the dot product; if two variable vectors are always perpendicular, then their dot product is always zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
===Externals links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Main Idea ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electric potential energy, like all forms of potential energy, is the potential for work to be done, in this case by the electric force. The electric potential (frequently referred to as voltage, from its SI unit the Volt) is the electric potential energy associated with the test charge, such that it depends only on the source, just as the electric field is related to the electric force, but depends only on the source. One may similarly remember the parallel concept of the gravitational potential, which was gravitational potential energy divided by mass.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
====Electric Potential Energy====&lt;br /&gt;
Electric potential energy may be calculated in a variety of manners, depending upon the situation. The electric potential energy between two point charges may be written in a form which follows directly from the definition of the Coulomb force:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = \frac{qQ}{4\pi\epsilon_0 r_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is the amount of energy which would be required to bring one of the charged objects (by convention the small &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; q &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; charge) from an infinite distance to its current position, where, by convention, the potential energy at infinity is equal to zero. This may, therefore, be derived from the equation for work:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Derivation with Calculus=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -W = -\int_\infty^{r_0} \vec{F}_E(r) \cdot \text{d} \vec{r} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -\int_\infty^{r_0} \frac{qQ \hat{r}}{4\pi\epsilon_0 r^2} \cdot \text{d} \vec{r} = -\frac{qQ}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\int_\infty^{r_0} \frac{\hat{r} \cdot \hat{r}}{r^2} \text{d} r &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = \frac{qQ}{4\pi \epsilon_0} \biggr{(} \frac{1}{r} \biggr{|}_{\infty}^{r_0} = \frac{qQ}{4\pi \epsilon_0 r_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Given our definition of the [[Electric Field]], we have that &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vec{F}_E(r) = q\vec{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
so the electric potential energy may be generally written as &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -q\int_a^b \vec{E} \cdot \text{d} \vec{r} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Linear assumption=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the above equation, one can see that if the electric field is constant over the length of the path, then electric potential energy may be written in a simplified manner as&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = q\vec{E}\cdot\Delta \vec{s} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Electric Potential====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just as we divided by charge to go from electric force to electric field, dividing by charge takes us from the electric potential energy to the electric potential. For a test particle of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; q &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we define &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; V = \frac{U}{q} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Derivation with Calculus=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is not especially meaningful without choosing a reference point, just as for potential energy. Thus, one may speak of the potential difference between two points, which is independent of the reference value. From the above definition of electric potential energy, it is possible to derive an expression for the potential difference between two points from the electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\int_a^b \vec{E} \cdot \text{d} \vec{s} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The vectors are used to express the path associated with this integral. The difference in electric potential will be the same no matter what path one takes, as explored in [[Path Independence of Electric Potential]]. This also allows one to write the inverse relationship, determining the electric field at a given point from the electric potential in one and three dimensions respectively:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; E = -\frac{\text{d}V}{\text{d}x}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vec{E} = -\nabla V &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \nabla &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the gradient operator.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Linear Assumption=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The above equations allow us to write the equivalent expressions under an assumption of constant values for the electric field, such that the integral reduces to &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\vec{E} \cdot \Delta \vec{l} = -(E_x \Delta x + E_y \Delta y + E_z \Delta z)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This also leads directly to the inverse expression:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vec{E} = -(\frac{\Delta V_x}{\Delta x} + \frac{\Delta V_y}{\Delta y} + \frac{\Delta V_z}{\Delta z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric potential difference in a field which is nonuniform, but whose variations are discrete, is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\sum \vec{E}\cdot \Delta\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The different parts in this particular equation resembles the equation for the potential difference in an uniform field, except that with the nonuniform field, the potential difference in the different fields are summed up. This situation can be quite easy, but when the system gets difficult, first, choose a path and divide it into smaller pieces of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;; second, write an expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -\vec{E}\cdot\Delta\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of one piece; third, add up the contributions of all the pieces; last, check the result to make sure the magnitude, direction, and units make sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is important to keep track of the sign differences. If the path follows the direction of the electric field, the sign of the potential difference will be negative. This may be imagined as dropping a positive test charge in an electric field: a positive charge will be accelerated in the direction of the field, meaning that it is gaining energy, and so its potential must be decreasing. By contrast, if the path is opposite the direction of the field, potential will be increasing, much like rolling a boulder up a hill. If the path is perpendicular to the direction of the electric field, the dot product will be equal to zero. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, when working with different situations, it is nice to keep in mind that in a conductor, the electric field is zero. Therefore, the potential difference is zero as well. In an insulator, the electric field is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{E_{applied}}{K}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the dielectric constant. Furthermore, the potential difference over a round trip is equal to zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
Click on the link to see Electric Potential through VPython!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Make sure to press &amp;quot;Run&amp;quot; to see the principle in action!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://trinket.io/embed/glowscript/0a7e486c94 Teach hand-on with GlowScript]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Watch this video for a more visual approach! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Rb9guSEeVE Electric Potential: Visualizing Voltage with 3D animations]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--== Models ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric potential of a particle at a point is equal to the potential difference of that particle with respect to infinity. Since we know how to calculate the potential difference using the formula, we can see that this implies that the electric potential at infinity is equal to zero. What does this mean? This means that a particle that is extremely far away has no potential energy. This makes sense, because a proton will not be affected by the electric field of another proton at a distance of infinity apart. This subtle detail aids in solving a case of problems types later on.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although electric potential is an important topic to learn, most problems encountered will not ask to find just the &amp;quot;electric potential,&amp;quot; instead, questions will most likely ask for the &amp;quot;electric potential difference.&amp;quot; This is because electric potential is measured using different locations, or more specifically pathways between the different locations, so instead of determining the electric potential of location A and the electric potential of final location B, it would make more sense to determine the &amp;quot;difference in electric potential between locations A and B.&amp;quot; The following mathematical model will further explain this. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like mentioned before, instead of electric potential, in most cases, electric potential difference is needed to be found. The general equation for the potential difference is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{{U}_{electric}} = {q} * ∆{V} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{{U}_{electric}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric potential energy, which is measured in Joules (J). &#039;&#039;&#039;q&#039;&#039;&#039; is the charge of the particle moving through the path of the electric potential difference, which is measured in coulombs (C). &#039;&#039;&#039;∆V&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric potential difference, which is measured in Joules per Coulomb (J/C), or just Volts (V).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Aside from the general equation, the electric potential difference can also be found in other ways. The potential difference in an &#039;&#039;&#039;uniform field&#039;&#039;&#039; is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{V} = -({E}_{x}∆{x} + {E}_{y}∆{y} + {E}_{z}∆{z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;, which can also be written as &#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{V} = -\vec{E}·∆\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the electric potential difference, which is measured in Joules per Coulomb (J/C), or just Volts (V). &#039;&#039;&#039;E&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric field, which is measured in Newtons per Coulomb (N/C), and it is important to note that the different direction components of the electric field are used in the equation. &#039;&#039;&#039;l&#039;&#039;&#039; (or the &#039;&#039;&#039;x&#039;&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;&#039;y&#039;&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;&#039;z&#039;&#039;&#039;) is the distance between the two described locations, which is measured in meters, and x, y, and z, are the different components of the difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, when working with different situations, it is nice to keep in mind that in a conductor, the electric field is zero. Therefore, the potential difference is zero as well. In an insulator, the electric field is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;{E}_{applied} / K&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; where &#039;&#039;&#039;K&#039;&#039;&#039; is the dielectric constant. Also, the round trip potential difference is always zero, or in other words, if you start from a certain point and end at the same point, then, the potential difference will be zero. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
In a capacitor, the negative charges are located on the left plate, and the positive charges are located on the right plate. Location A is at the left end of the capacitor, and Location B is at the right end of the capacitor, or in other words, Location A and B are only different in terms of their x component location. The path moves from A to B. What is the direction of the electric field? Is the potential difference positive or negative? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ep125.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer: The electric field is to the left. The potential difference is increasing, or is positive.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
The electric field always moves away from the positive charge and towards the negative charge, which means the electric field in this example is to the left. Because the direction and the electric field and the direction of the path are opposite, the potential difference is increasing, or is positive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Calculate the change in electric potential between point A, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(-4, 3,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and B, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(2,-2,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; . The electric field in the location is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; (50,0,0) \; N/C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:EP mid fig.png ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer: -300V&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta\vec{l}= (2,-2,0)\;m - (-4,3,0)\;m = (6,-5,0)\;m &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -({E}_{x}∆{x} + {E}_{y}∆{y} + {E}_{z}∆{z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -(50\; N/C \cdot 6 \;m + 0 \; N/c \cdot -5 \; m + 0\cdot 0)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -300 V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Bohr Model]] of the hydrogen atom treats it as a nucleus of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; +e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; electrons of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; orbiting in circular orbits of specific radii. Calculate the potential difference between two points, one infinitely far away from the nucleus, and the other one Bohr radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; away from the nucleus (don&#039;t worry about substituting in the values). Compute the electric potential energy associated with the electron one Bohr radius away from the nucleus, setting the potential energy at infinity as zero (remember the sign of the charge). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We may compute the electric potential by taking integrating the electric field of a point charge as the radius goes from infinity to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. This integral may be set up as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\int_\infty^{a_0} \vec{E}\cdot\text{d}\vec{l} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \int_\infty^{a_0} \frac{\text{d} r}{r^2} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This may then be solved:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\biggr{(}\frac{1}{r}\biggr{|}_\infty^{a_0} = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
to compute the potential energy, we now multiply by the charge of the electron: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, giving &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -\frac{e^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Depending on what physics or chemistry courses you may have taken before, this may be recognizable as twice the ionization energy of the n=1 orbital. The factor of two is due to the fact that in the Bohr model, the kinetic energy will be exactly half of this potential energy, and will be positive so that the net result is still negative, but with half the magnitude. This understanding of the hydrogen atom gets certain values right, but the reality of the situation is far more complicated. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is this topic connected to something that you are interested in?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am interested in robotic systems and building circuit boards and electrical systems for manufacturing robots. While studying this section in the book, I was able to connect back many of the concepts and calculations back to robotics and the electrical component of automated systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Since high school, I never really understood how to work with the voltmeter and what it measured, and I have always wanted to know, but although this particular wiki page did not go into the details and other branches of electric potential, it led me to find the answers to something I was interested in since high school, the concept of electric potential.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I think electively is really interesting. When I was younger, I participated in this demo where a group of people hold hands and someone touches this special ball full of charge. We all could feel the tingling sensation of the current passing through us. It’s cool to learn the theory behind the supposed magic that occurs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I think it&#039;s very interesting that electric potential can be seen as a property of a space and that we can have further applications using this property.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is it connected to your major?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am a Mechanical Engineering major, so I will be dealing with the electrical components of machines when I work. Therefore, I have to know these certain concepts such as electric potential in order to fully understand how they work and interact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revistionist] As a biochemistry major, electric potential and electric potential difference is not particularly related to my major, but in chemistry classes, we use electrostatic potential maps (electrostatic potential energy maps) that shows the charge distributions throughout a molecule. Although the main use in electric potential is different in physics and biochemistry (where physicists use it identify the effect of the electric field at a location), I still found it interesting as the concept of electric potential (buildup) was being used in quite a different way. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I am a computer science major. Although I deal mostly with software, the hardware aspect is still important. The algorithms that I design run differently on different machines. The time complexity of an algorithm is sometimes useless when worrying about constant factors that are determined by a system’s hardware. Quicksort, for instance, is usually faster than many other sorts that have lower time complexities. The hardware of computers heavily relies on electricity and current (which is induced by a potential difference) to switch transistors on and off and thereby process information. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I am an aerospace engineering major, and I think understanding such concepts will help me have a better holistic understanding towards fields and systems. In addition, the thinking behind solving related problems will help me better prepared for future classes that involve with solving dynamics problems. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Is there an interesting industrial application?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] Electrical potential is used to find the voltage across a path. This is useful when working with circuit components and attempting to manipulate the power output or current throughout a component.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Electric potential sensors are being used to detect a variety of electrical signals made by the human body, thus contributing to the field of electrophysiology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] The study of electric potential has lead scientists to generate very safe wires that will not overheat and cause fires. Connecting circuits to ground is important and the third prong in an electrical outlet is this ground connection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The idea of electric potential, in a way, started with Ben Franklin and his experiments in the 1740s. He began to understand the flow of electricity, which eventually paved the path towards explaining electric potential and potential difference. Scientists finally began to understand how electric fields were actually affecting the charges and the surrounding environment. Benjamin Franklin first shocked himself in 1746, while conducting experiments on electricity with found objects from around his house. Six years later, or 261 years ago for us, the founding father flew a kite attached to a key and a silk ribbon in a thunderstorm and effectively trapped lightning in a jar. The experiment is now seen as a watershed moment in mankind&#039;s venture to channel a force of nature that was viewed quite abstractly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the time Franklin started experimenting with electricity, he&#039;d already found fame and fortune as the author of Poor Richard&#039;s Almanack. Electricity wasn&#039;t a very well understood phenomenon at that point, so Franklin&#039;s research proved to be fairly foundational. The early experiments, experts believe, were inspired by other scientists&#039; work and the shortcomings therein.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ep135.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
source: http://www.benjamin-franklin-history.org/kite-experiment/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That early brush with the dangers of electricity left an impression on Franklin. He described the sensation as &amp;quot;a universal blow throughout my whole body from head to foot, which seemed within as well as without; after which the first thing I took notice of was a violent quick shaking of my body.&amp;quot; However, it didn&#039;t scare him away. In the handful of years before his famous kite experiment, Franklin contributed everything from designing the first battery designs to establishing some common nomenclature in the study of electricity. Although Franklin is often coined the father of electricity, after he set the foundations of electricity, many other scientists contributed his or her research in the advancement of electricity and eventually led to the discovery of electric potential and potential difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like mentioned multiple times throughout the page, although electric potential is a huge and important topic, it has many branches, which makes the concept of electric potential difficult to stand alone. Even with this page, to support the concept of electric potential, many crucial branches of the topic appeared, like potential difference (which also branched into [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_Path_Independence,_claimed_by_Aditya_Mohile Potential Difference Path Independence]], [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_in_a_Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Uniform Field]], and [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_of_Point_Charge_in_a_Non-Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Nonuniform Field]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External Links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] https://www.khanacademy.org/test-prep/mcat/physical-processes/electrostatics-1/v/electric-potential-at-a-point-in-space&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pcWz4tP_zUw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vpa_uApmNoo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] https://www.khanacademy.org/science/electrical-engineering/ee-electrostatics/ee-fields-potential-voltage/a/ee-electric-potential-voltage&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] &amp;quot;Benjamin Franklin and Electricity.&amp;quot; Benjamin Franklin and Electricity. N.p., n.d. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.americaslibrary.gov/aa/franklinb/aa_franklinb_electric_1.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Bottyan, Thomas. &amp;quot;Electrostatic Potential Maps.&amp;quot; Chemwiki. N.p., 02 Oct. 2013. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://chemwiki.ucdavis.edu/Core/Theoretical_Chemistry/Chemical_Bonding/General_Principles_of_Chemical_Bonding/Electrostatic_Potential_maps&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] &amp;quot;Electric Potential Difference.&amp;quot; Electric Potential Difference. The Physics Classroom, n.d. Web. 14 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/circuits/Lesson-1/Electric-Potential-Difference&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] Harland, C. J., T. D. Clark, and R. J. Prance. &amp;quot;Applications of Electric Potential (Displacement Current) Sensors in Human Body Electrophysiology.&amp;quot; International Society for Industrial Process Tomography, n.d. Web. 16 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.isipt.org/world-congress/3/269.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] Sherwood, Bruce A. &amp;quot;2.1 The Momentum Principle.&amp;quot; Matter &amp;amp; Interactions. By Ruth W. Chabay. 4th ed. Vol. 1. N.p.: John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons, 2015. 45-50. Print. Modern Mechanics.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurence12799</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=File:ElectricPotentialPaths.png&amp;diff=38614</id>
		<title>File:ElectricPotentialPaths.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=File:ElectricPotentialPaths.png&amp;diff=38614"/>
		<updated>2020-03-24T18:48:51Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurence12799: A personally created figure in Word for the Electric Potential page.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;A personally created figure in Word for the Electric Potential page.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurence12799</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=38613</id>
		<title>Electric Potential</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=38613"/>
		<updated>2020-03-24T18:31:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurence12799: /* The Main Idea */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039;, like all forms of potential energy, is the potential for work to be done, in this case by the electric force. The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; (frequently referred to as voltage, from its SI unit, the Volt) is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; associated with the test charge (1 Coulomb), such that it depends only on the source, just as the electric field is related to the electric force, but depends only on the source. One may similarly remember the parallel concept of the gravitational potential, which was gravitational potential energy divided by mass.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined with respect to the [[Electric Force]] &amp;amp; [[Electric Field]]:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} = - q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; from point b to point a&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the charge in the electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the source charge&#039;s electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a differential length along the path from point b to point a&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From this, the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; per test charge in the source charge&#039;s electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{U_{ab}}{q} = - \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
===Externals links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Main Idea ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electric potential energy, like all forms of potential energy, is the potential for work to be done, in this case by the electric force. The electric potential (frequently referred to as voltage, from its SI unit the Volt) is the electric potential energy associated with the test charge, such that it depends only on the source, just as the electric field is related to the electric force, but depends only on the source. One may similarly remember the parallel concept of the gravitational potential, which was gravitational potential energy divided by mass.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
====Electric Potential Energy====&lt;br /&gt;
Electric potential energy may be calculated in a variety of manners, depending upon the situation. The electric potential energy between two point charges may be written in a form which follows directly from the definition of the Coulomb force:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = \frac{qQ}{4\pi\epsilon_0 r_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is the amount of energy which would be required to bring one of the charged objects (by convention the small &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; q &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; charge) from an infinite distance to its current position, where, by convention, the potential energy at infinity is equal to zero. This may, therefore, be derived from the equation for work:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Derivation with Calculus=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -W = -\int_\infty^{r_0} \vec{F}_E(r) \cdot \text{d} \vec{r} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -\int_\infty^{r_0} \frac{qQ \hat{r}}{4\pi\epsilon_0 r^2} \cdot \text{d} \vec{r} = -\frac{qQ}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\int_\infty^{r_0} \frac{\hat{r} \cdot \hat{r}}{r^2} \text{d} r &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = \frac{qQ}{4\pi \epsilon_0} \biggr{(} \frac{1}{r} \biggr{|}_{\infty}^{r_0} = \frac{qQ}{4\pi \epsilon_0 r_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Given our definition of the [[Electric Field]], we have that &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vec{F}_E(r) = q\vec{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
so the electric potential energy may be generally written as &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -q\int_a^b \vec{E} \cdot \text{d} \vec{r} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Linear assumption=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the above equation, one can see that if the electric field is constant over the length of the path, then electric potential energy may be written in a simplified manner as&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = q\vec{E}\cdot\Delta \vec{s} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Electric Potential====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just as we divided by charge to go from electric force to electric field, dividing by charge takes us from the electric potential energy to the electric potential. For a test particle of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; q &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we define &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; V = \frac{U}{q} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Derivation with Calculus=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is not especially meaningful without choosing a reference point, just as for potential energy. Thus, one may speak of the potential difference between two points, which is independent of the reference value. From the above definition of electric potential energy, it is possible to derive an expression for the potential difference between two points from the electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\int_a^b \vec{E} \cdot \text{d} \vec{s} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The vectors are used to express the path associated with this integral. The difference in electric potential will be the same no matter what path one takes, as explored in [[Path Independence of Electric Potential]]. This also allows one to write the inverse relationship, determining the electric field at a given point from the electric potential in one and three dimensions respectively:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; E = -\frac{\text{d}V}{\text{d}x}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vec{E} = -\nabla V &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \nabla &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the gradient operator.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Linear Assumption=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The above equations allow us to write the equivalent expressions under an assumption of constant values for the electric field, such that the integral reduces to &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\vec{E} \cdot \Delta \vec{l} = -(E_x \Delta x + E_y \Delta y + E_z \Delta z)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This also leads directly to the inverse expression:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vec{E} = -(\frac{\Delta V_x}{\Delta x} + \frac{\Delta V_y}{\Delta y} + \frac{\Delta V_z}{\Delta z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric potential difference in a field which is nonuniform, but whose variations are discrete, is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\sum \vec{E}\cdot \Delta\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The different parts in this particular equation resembles the equation for the potential difference in an uniform field, except that with the nonuniform field, the potential difference in the different fields are summed up. This situation can be quite easy, but when the system gets difficult, first, choose a path and divide it into smaller pieces of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;; second, write an expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -\vec{E}\cdot\Delta\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of one piece; third, add up the contributions of all the pieces; last, check the result to make sure the magnitude, direction, and units make sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is important to keep track of the sign differences. If the path follows the direction of the electric field, the sign of the potential difference will be negative. This may be imagined as dropping a positive test charge in an electric field: a positive charge will be accelerated in the direction of the field, meaning that it is gaining energy, and so its potential must be decreasing. By contrast, if the path is opposite the direction of the field, potential will be increasing, much like rolling a boulder up a hill. If the path is perpendicular to the direction of the electric field, the dot product will be equal to zero. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, when working with different situations, it is nice to keep in mind that in a conductor, the electric field is zero. Therefore, the potential difference is zero as well. In an insulator, the electric field is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{E_{applied}}{K}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the dielectric constant. Furthermore, the potential difference over a round trip is equal to zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
Click on the link to see Electric Potential through VPython!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Make sure to press &amp;quot;Run&amp;quot; to see the principle in action!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://trinket.io/embed/glowscript/0a7e486c94 Teach hand-on with GlowScript]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Watch this video for a more visual approach! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Rb9guSEeVE Electric Potential: Visualizing Voltage with 3D animations]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--== Models ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric potential of a particle at a point is equal to the potential difference of that particle with respect to infinity. Since we know how to calculate the potential difference using the formula, we can see that this implies that the electric potential at infinity is equal to zero. What does this mean? This means that a particle that is extremely far away has no potential energy. This makes sense, because a proton will not be affected by the electric field of another proton at a distance of infinity apart. This subtle detail aids in solving a case of problems types later on.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although electric potential is an important topic to learn, most problems encountered will not ask to find just the &amp;quot;electric potential,&amp;quot; instead, questions will most likely ask for the &amp;quot;electric potential difference.&amp;quot; This is because electric potential is measured using different locations, or more specifically pathways between the different locations, so instead of determining the electric potential of location A and the electric potential of final location B, it would make more sense to determine the &amp;quot;difference in electric potential between locations A and B.&amp;quot; The following mathematical model will further explain this. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like mentioned before, instead of electric potential, in most cases, electric potential difference is needed to be found. The general equation for the potential difference is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{{U}_{electric}} = {q} * ∆{V} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{{U}_{electric}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric potential energy, which is measured in Joules (J). &#039;&#039;&#039;q&#039;&#039;&#039; is the charge of the particle moving through the path of the electric potential difference, which is measured in coulombs (C). &#039;&#039;&#039;∆V&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric potential difference, which is measured in Joules per Coulomb (J/C), or just Volts (V).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Aside from the general equation, the electric potential difference can also be found in other ways. The potential difference in an &#039;&#039;&#039;uniform field&#039;&#039;&#039; is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{V} = -({E}_{x}∆{x} + {E}_{y}∆{y} + {E}_{z}∆{z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;, which can also be written as &#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{V} = -\vec{E}·∆\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the electric potential difference, which is measured in Joules per Coulomb (J/C), or just Volts (V). &#039;&#039;&#039;E&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric field, which is measured in Newtons per Coulomb (N/C), and it is important to note that the different direction components of the electric field are used in the equation. &#039;&#039;&#039;l&#039;&#039;&#039; (or the &#039;&#039;&#039;x&#039;&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;&#039;y&#039;&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;&#039;z&#039;&#039;&#039;) is the distance between the two described locations, which is measured in meters, and x, y, and z, are the different components of the difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, when working with different situations, it is nice to keep in mind that in a conductor, the electric field is zero. Therefore, the potential difference is zero as well. In an insulator, the electric field is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;{E}_{applied} / K&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; where &#039;&#039;&#039;K&#039;&#039;&#039; is the dielectric constant. Also, the round trip potential difference is always zero, or in other words, if you start from a certain point and end at the same point, then, the potential difference will be zero. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
In a capacitor, the negative charges are located on the left plate, and the positive charges are located on the right plate. Location A is at the left end of the capacitor, and Location B is at the right end of the capacitor, or in other words, Location A and B are only different in terms of their x component location. The path moves from A to B. What is the direction of the electric field? Is the potential difference positive or negative? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ep125.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer: The electric field is to the left. The potential difference is increasing, or is positive.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
The electric field always moves away from the positive charge and towards the negative charge, which means the electric field in this example is to the left. Because the direction and the electric field and the direction of the path are opposite, the potential difference is increasing, or is positive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Calculate the change in electric potential between point A, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(-4, 3,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and B, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(2,-2,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; . The electric field in the location is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; (50,0,0) \; N/C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:EP mid fig.png ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer: -300V&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta\vec{l}= (2,-2,0)\;m - (-4,3,0)\;m = (6,-5,0)\;m &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -({E}_{x}∆{x} + {E}_{y}∆{y} + {E}_{z}∆{z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -(50\; N/C \cdot 6 \;m + 0 \; N/c \cdot -5 \; m + 0\cdot 0)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -300 V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Bohr Model]] of the hydrogen atom treats it as a nucleus of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; +e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; electrons of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; orbiting in circular orbits of specific radii. Calculate the potential difference between two points, one infinitely far away from the nucleus, and the other one Bohr radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; away from the nucleus (don&#039;t worry about substituting in the values). Compute the electric potential energy associated with the electron one Bohr radius away from the nucleus, setting the potential energy at infinity as zero (remember the sign of the charge). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We may compute the electric potential by taking integrating the electric field of a point charge as the radius goes from infinity to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. This integral may be set up as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\int_\infty^{a_0} \vec{E}\cdot\text{d}\vec{l} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \int_\infty^{a_0} \frac{\text{d} r}{r^2} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This may then be solved:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\biggr{(}\frac{1}{r}\biggr{|}_\infty^{a_0} = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
to compute the potential energy, we now multiply by the charge of the electron: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, giving &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -\frac{e^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Depending on what physics or chemistry courses you may have taken before, this may be recognizable as twice the ionization energy of the n=1 orbital. The factor of two is due to the fact that in the Bohr model, the kinetic energy will be exactly half of this potential energy, and will be positive so that the net result is still negative, but with half the magnitude. This understanding of the hydrogen atom gets certain values right, but the reality of the situation is far more complicated. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is this topic connected to something that you are interested in?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am interested in robotic systems and building circuit boards and electrical systems for manufacturing robots. While studying this section in the book, I was able to connect back many of the concepts and calculations back to robotics and the electrical component of automated systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Since high school, I never really understood how to work with the voltmeter and what it measured, and I have always wanted to know, but although this particular wiki page did not go into the details and other branches of electric potential, it led me to find the answers to something I was interested in since high school, the concept of electric potential.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I think electively is really interesting. When I was younger, I participated in this demo where a group of people hold hands and someone touches this special ball full of charge. We all could feel the tingling sensation of the current passing through us. It’s cool to learn the theory behind the supposed magic that occurs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I think it&#039;s very interesting that electric potential can be seen as a property of a space and that we can have further applications using this property.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is it connected to your major?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am a Mechanical Engineering major, so I will be dealing with the electrical components of machines when I work. Therefore, I have to know these certain concepts such as electric potential in order to fully understand how they work and interact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revistionist] As a biochemistry major, electric potential and electric potential difference is not particularly related to my major, but in chemistry classes, we use electrostatic potential maps (electrostatic potential energy maps) that shows the charge distributions throughout a molecule. Although the main use in electric potential is different in physics and biochemistry (where physicists use it identify the effect of the electric field at a location), I still found it interesting as the concept of electric potential (buildup) was being used in quite a different way. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I am a computer science major. Although I deal mostly with software, the hardware aspect is still important. The algorithms that I design run differently on different machines. The time complexity of an algorithm is sometimes useless when worrying about constant factors that are determined by a system’s hardware. Quicksort, for instance, is usually faster than many other sorts that have lower time complexities. The hardware of computers heavily relies on electricity and current (which is induced by a potential difference) to switch transistors on and off and thereby process information. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I am an aerospace engineering major, and I think understanding such concepts will help me have a better holistic understanding towards fields and systems. In addition, the thinking behind solving related problems will help me better prepared for future classes that involve with solving dynamics problems. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Is there an interesting industrial application?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] Electrical potential is used to find the voltage across a path. This is useful when working with circuit components and attempting to manipulate the power output or current throughout a component.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Electric potential sensors are being used to detect a variety of electrical signals made by the human body, thus contributing to the field of electrophysiology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] The study of electric potential has lead scientists to generate very safe wires that will not overheat and cause fires. Connecting circuits to ground is important and the third prong in an electrical outlet is this ground connection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The idea of electric potential, in a way, started with Ben Franklin and his experiments in the 1740s. He began to understand the flow of electricity, which eventually paved the path towards explaining electric potential and potential difference. Scientists finally began to understand how electric fields were actually affecting the charges and the surrounding environment. Benjamin Franklin first shocked himself in 1746, while conducting experiments on electricity with found objects from around his house. Six years later, or 261 years ago for us, the founding father flew a kite attached to a key and a silk ribbon in a thunderstorm and effectively trapped lightning in a jar. The experiment is now seen as a watershed moment in mankind&#039;s venture to channel a force of nature that was viewed quite abstractly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the time Franklin started experimenting with electricity, he&#039;d already found fame and fortune as the author of Poor Richard&#039;s Almanack. Electricity wasn&#039;t a very well understood phenomenon at that point, so Franklin&#039;s research proved to be fairly foundational. The early experiments, experts believe, were inspired by other scientists&#039; work and the shortcomings therein.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ep135.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
source: http://www.benjamin-franklin-history.org/kite-experiment/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That early brush with the dangers of electricity left an impression on Franklin. He described the sensation as &amp;quot;a universal blow throughout my whole body from head to foot, which seemed within as well as without; after which the first thing I took notice of was a violent quick shaking of my body.&amp;quot; However, it didn&#039;t scare him away. In the handful of years before his famous kite experiment, Franklin contributed everything from designing the first battery designs to establishing some common nomenclature in the study of electricity. Although Franklin is often coined the father of electricity, after he set the foundations of electricity, many other scientists contributed his or her research in the advancement of electricity and eventually led to the discovery of electric potential and potential difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like mentioned multiple times throughout the page, although electric potential is a huge and important topic, it has many branches, which makes the concept of electric potential difficult to stand alone. Even with this page, to support the concept of electric potential, many crucial branches of the topic appeared, like potential difference (which also branched into [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_Path_Independence,_claimed_by_Aditya_Mohile Potential Difference Path Independence]], [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_in_a_Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Uniform Field]], and [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_of_Point_Charge_in_a_Non-Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Nonuniform Field]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External Links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] https://www.khanacademy.org/test-prep/mcat/physical-processes/electrostatics-1/v/electric-potential-at-a-point-in-space&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pcWz4tP_zUw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vpa_uApmNoo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] https://www.khanacademy.org/science/electrical-engineering/ee-electrostatics/ee-fields-potential-voltage/a/ee-electric-potential-voltage&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] &amp;quot;Benjamin Franklin and Electricity.&amp;quot; Benjamin Franklin and Electricity. N.p., n.d. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.americaslibrary.gov/aa/franklinb/aa_franklinb_electric_1.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Bottyan, Thomas. &amp;quot;Electrostatic Potential Maps.&amp;quot; Chemwiki. N.p., 02 Oct. 2013. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://chemwiki.ucdavis.edu/Core/Theoretical_Chemistry/Chemical_Bonding/General_Principles_of_Chemical_Bonding/Electrostatic_Potential_maps&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] &amp;quot;Electric Potential Difference.&amp;quot; Electric Potential Difference. The Physics Classroom, n.d. Web. 14 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/circuits/Lesson-1/Electric-Potential-Difference&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] Harland, C. J., T. D. Clark, and R. J. Prance. &amp;quot;Applications of Electric Potential (Displacement Current) Sensors in Human Body Electrophysiology.&amp;quot; International Society for Industrial Process Tomography, n.d. Web. 16 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.isipt.org/world-congress/3/269.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] Sherwood, Bruce A. &amp;quot;2.1 The Momentum Principle.&amp;quot; Matter &amp;amp; Interactions. By Ruth W. Chabay. 4th ed. Vol. 1. N.p.: John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons, 2015. 45-50. Print. Modern Mechanics.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurence12799</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=38569</id>
		<title>Electric Potential</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=38569"/>
		<updated>2020-03-18T02:47:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurence12799: /* A Mathematical Model */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039;, like all forms of potential energy, is the potential for work to be done, in this case by the electric force. The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; (frequently referred to as voltage, from its SI unit the Volt) is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; associated with the test charge, such that it depends only on the source, just as the electric field is related to the electric force, but depends only on the source. One may similarly remember the parallel concept of the gravitational potential, which was gravitational potential energy divided by mass.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined with respect to the [[Electric Force]] &amp;amp; [[Electric Field]]:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab} = - Q \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U_{ab}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; from point b to a&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the charge in the electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the source charge&#039;s electric field&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a differential length along the path from point b to a&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From this, the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; is defined as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; per test charge:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = \frac{U_{ab}}{Q} = - \int_{b}^{a} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
===Externals links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Main Idea ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electric potential energy, like all forms of potential energy, is the potential for work to be done, in this case by the electric force. The electric potential (frequently referred to as voltage, from its SI unit the Volt) is the electric potential energy associated with the test charge, such that it depends only on the source, just as the electric field is related to the electric force, but depends only on the source. One may similarly remember the parallel concept of the gravitational potential, which was gravitational potential energy divided by mass.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
====Electric Potential Energy====&lt;br /&gt;
Electric potential energy may be calculated in a variety of manners, depending upon the situation. The electric potential energy between two point charges may be written in a form which follows directly from the definition of the Coulomb force:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = \frac{qQ}{4\pi\epsilon_0 r_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is the amount of energy which would be required to bring one of the charged objects (by convention the small &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; q &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; charge) from an infinite distance to its current position, where, by convention, the potential energy at infinity is equal to zero. This may, therefore, be derived from the equation for work:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Derivation with Calculus=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -W = -\int_\infty^{r_0} \vec{F}_E(r) \cdot \text{d} \vec{r} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -\int_\infty^{r_0} \frac{qQ \hat{r}}{4\pi\epsilon_0 r^2} \cdot \text{d} \vec{r} = -\frac{qQ}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\int_\infty^{r_0} \frac{\hat{r} \cdot \hat{r}}{r^2} \text{d} r &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = \frac{qQ}{4\pi \epsilon_0} \biggr{(} \frac{1}{r} \biggr{|}_{\infty}^{r_0} = \frac{qQ}{4\pi \epsilon_0 r_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Given our definition of the [[Electric Field]], we have that &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vec{F}_E(r) = q\vec{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
so the electric potential energy may be generally written as &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -q\int_a^b \vec{E} \cdot \text{d} \vec{r} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Linear assumption=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the above equation, one can see that if the electric field is constant over the length of the path, then electric potential energy may be written in a simplified manner as&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = q\vec{E}\cdot\Delta \vec{s} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Electric Potential====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just as we divided by charge to go from electric force to electric field, dividing by charge takes us from the electric potential energy to the electric potential. For a test particle of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; q &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we define &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; V = \frac{U}{q} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Derivation with Calculus=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is not especially meaningful without choosing a reference point, just as for potential energy. Thus, one may speak of the potential difference between two points, which is independent of the reference value. From the above definition of electric potential energy, it is possible to derive an expression for the potential difference between two points from the electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\int_a^b \vec{E} \cdot \text{d} \vec{s} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The vectors are used to express the path associated with this integral. The difference in electric potential will be the same no matter what path one takes, as explored in [[Path Independence of Electric Potential]]. This also allows one to write the inverse relationship, determining the electric field at a given point from the electric potential in one and three dimensions respectively:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; E = -\frac{\text{d}V}{\text{d}x}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vec{E} = -\nabla V &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \nabla &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the gradient operator.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Linear Assumption=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The above equations allow us to write the equivalent expressions under an assumption of constant values for the electric field, such that the integral reduces to &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\vec{E} \cdot \Delta \vec{l} = -(E_x \Delta x + E_y \Delta y + E_z \Delta z)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This also leads directly to the inverse expression:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vec{E} = -(\frac{\Delta V_x}{\Delta x} + \frac{\Delta V_y}{\Delta y} + \frac{\Delta V_z}{\Delta z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric potential difference in a field which is nonuniform, but whose variations are discrete, is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\sum \vec{E}\cdot \Delta\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The different parts in this particular equation resembles the equation for the potential difference in an uniform field, except that with the nonuniform field, the potential difference in the different fields are summed up. This situation can be quite easy, but when the system gets difficult, first, choose a path and divide it into smaller pieces of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;; second, write an expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -\vec{E}\cdot\Delta\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of one piece; third, add up the contributions of all the pieces; last, check the result to make sure the magnitude, direction, and units make sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is important to keep track of the sign differences. If the path follows the direction of the electric field, the sign of the potential difference will be negative. This may be imagined as dropping a positive test charge in an electric field: a positive charge will be accelerated in the direction of the field, meaning that it is gaining energy, and so its potential must be decreasing. By contrast, if the path is opposite the direction of the field, potential will be increasing, much like rolling a boulder up a hill. If the path is perpendicular to the direction of the electric field, the dot product will be equal to zero. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, when working with different situations, it is nice to keep in mind that in a conductor, the electric field is zero. Therefore, the potential difference is zero as well. In an insulator, the electric field is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{E_{applied}}{K}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the dielectric constant. Furthermore, the potential difference over a round trip is equal to zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
Click on the link to see Electric Potential through VPython!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Make sure to press &amp;quot;Run&amp;quot; to see the principle in action!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://trinket.io/embed/glowscript/0a7e486c94 Teach hand-on with GlowScript]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Watch this video for a more visual approach! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Rb9guSEeVE Electric Potential: Visualizing Voltage with 3D animations]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--== Models ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric potential of a particle at a point is equal to the potential difference of that particle with respect to infinity. Since we know how to calculate the potential difference using the formula, we can see that this implies that the electric potential at infinity is equal to zero. What does this mean? This means that a particle that is extremely far away has no potential energy. This makes sense, because a proton will not be affected by the electric field of another proton at a distance of infinity apart. This subtle detail aids in solving a case of problems types later on.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although electric potential is an important topic to learn, most problems encountered will not ask to find just the &amp;quot;electric potential,&amp;quot; instead, questions will most likely ask for the &amp;quot;electric potential difference.&amp;quot; This is because electric potential is measured using different locations, or more specifically pathways between the different locations, so instead of determining the electric potential of location A and the electric potential of final location B, it would make more sense to determine the &amp;quot;difference in electric potential between locations A and B.&amp;quot; The following mathematical model will further explain this. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like mentioned before, instead of electric potential, in most cases, electric potential difference is needed to be found. The general equation for the potential difference is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{{U}_{electric}} = {q} * ∆{V} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{{U}_{electric}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric potential energy, which is measured in Joules (J). &#039;&#039;&#039;q&#039;&#039;&#039; is the charge of the particle moving through the path of the electric potential difference, which is measured in coulombs (C). &#039;&#039;&#039;∆V&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric potential difference, which is measured in Joules per Coulomb (J/C), or just Volts (V).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Aside from the general equation, the electric potential difference can also be found in other ways. The potential difference in an &#039;&#039;&#039;uniform field&#039;&#039;&#039; is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{V} = -({E}_{x}∆{x} + {E}_{y}∆{y} + {E}_{z}∆{z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;, which can also be written as &#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{V} = -\vec{E}·∆\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the electric potential difference, which is measured in Joules per Coulomb (J/C), or just Volts (V). &#039;&#039;&#039;E&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric field, which is measured in Newtons per Coulomb (N/C), and it is important to note that the different direction components of the electric field are used in the equation. &#039;&#039;&#039;l&#039;&#039;&#039; (or the &#039;&#039;&#039;x&#039;&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;&#039;y&#039;&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;&#039;z&#039;&#039;&#039;) is the distance between the two described locations, which is measured in meters, and x, y, and z, are the different components of the difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, when working with different situations, it is nice to keep in mind that in a conductor, the electric field is zero. Therefore, the potential difference is zero as well. In an insulator, the electric field is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;{E}_{applied} / K&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; where &#039;&#039;&#039;K&#039;&#039;&#039; is the dielectric constant. Also, the round trip potential difference is always zero, or in other words, if you start from a certain point and end at the same point, then, the potential difference will be zero. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
In a capacitor, the negative charges are located on the left plate, and the positive charges are located on the right plate. Location A is at the left end of the capacitor, and Location B is at the right end of the capacitor, or in other words, Location A and B are only different in terms of their x component location. The path moves from A to B. What is the direction of the electric field? Is the potential difference positive or negative? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ep125.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer: The electric field is to the left. The potential difference is increasing, or is positive.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
The electric field always moves away from the positive charge and towards the negative charge, which means the electric field in this example is to the left. Because the direction and the electric field and the direction of the path are opposite, the potential difference is increasing, or is positive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Calculate the change in electric potential between point A, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(-4, 3,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and B, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(2,-2,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; . The electric field in the location is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; (50,0,0) \; N/C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:EP mid fig.png ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer: -300V&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta\vec{l}= (2,-2,0)\;m - (-4,3,0)\;m = (6,-5,0)\;m &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -({E}_{x}∆{x} + {E}_{y}∆{y} + {E}_{z}∆{z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -(50\; N/C \cdot 6 \;m + 0 \; N/c \cdot -5 \; m + 0\cdot 0)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -300 V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Bohr Model]] of the hydrogen atom treats it as a nucleus of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; +e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; electrons of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; orbiting in circular orbits of specific radii. Calculate the potential difference between two points, one infinitely far away from the nucleus, and the other one Bohr radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; away from the nucleus (don&#039;t worry about substituting in the values). Compute the electric potential energy associated with the electron one Bohr radius away from the nucleus, setting the potential energy at infinity as zero (remember the sign of the charge). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We may compute the electric potential by taking integrating the electric field of a point charge as the radius goes from infinity to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. This integral may be set up as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\int_\infty^{a_0} \vec{E}\cdot\text{d}\vec{l} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \int_\infty^{a_0} \frac{\text{d} r}{r^2} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This may then be solved:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\biggr{(}\frac{1}{r}\biggr{|}_\infty^{a_0} = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
to compute the potential energy, we now multiply by the charge of the electron: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, giving &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -\frac{e^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Depending on what physics or chemistry courses you may have taken before, this may be recognizable as twice the ionization energy of the n=1 orbital. The factor of two is due to the fact that in the Bohr model, the kinetic energy will be exactly half of this potential energy, and will be positive so that the net result is still negative, but with half the magnitude. This understanding of the hydrogen atom gets certain values right, but the reality of the situation is far more complicated. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is this topic connected to something that you are interested in?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am interested in robotic systems and building circuit boards and electrical systems for manufacturing robots. While studying this section in the book, I was able to connect back many of the concepts and calculations back to robotics and the electrical component of automated systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Since high school, I never really understood how to work with the voltmeter and what it measured, and I have always wanted to know, but although this particular wiki page did not go into the details and other branches of electric potential, it led me to find the answers to something I was interested in since high school, the concept of electric potential.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I think electively is really interesting. When I was younger, I participated in this demo where a group of people hold hands and someone touches this special ball full of charge. We all could feel the tingling sensation of the current passing through us. It’s cool to learn the theory behind the supposed magic that occurs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I think it&#039;s very interesting that electric potential can be seen as a property of a space and that we can have further applications using this property.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is it connected to your major?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am a Mechanical Engineering major, so I will be dealing with the electrical components of machines when I work. Therefore, I have to know these certain concepts such as electric potential in order to fully understand how they work and interact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revistionist] As a biochemistry major, electric potential and electric potential difference is not particularly related to my major, but in chemistry classes, we use electrostatic potential maps (electrostatic potential energy maps) that shows the charge distributions throughout a molecule. Although the main use in electric potential is different in physics and biochemistry (where physicists use it identify the effect of the electric field at a location), I still found it interesting as the concept of electric potential (buildup) was being used in quite a different way. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I am a computer science major. Although I deal mostly with software, the hardware aspect is still important. The algorithms that I design run differently on different machines. The time complexity of an algorithm is sometimes useless when worrying about constant factors that are determined by a system’s hardware. Quicksort, for instance, is usually faster than many other sorts that have lower time complexities. The hardware of computers heavily relies on electricity and current (which is induced by a potential difference) to switch transistors on and off and thereby process information. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I am an aerospace engineering major, and I think understanding such concepts will help me have a better holistic understanding towards fields and systems. In addition, the thinking behind solving related problems will help me better prepared for future classes that involve with solving dynamics problems. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Is there an interesting industrial application?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] Electrical potential is used to find the voltage across a path. This is useful when working with circuit components and attempting to manipulate the power output or current throughout a component.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Electric potential sensors are being used to detect a variety of electrical signals made by the human body, thus contributing to the field of electrophysiology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] The study of electric potential has lead scientists to generate very safe wires that will not overheat and cause fires. Connecting circuits to ground is important and the third prong in an electrical outlet is this ground connection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The idea of electric potential, in a way, started with Ben Franklin and his experiments in the 1740s. He began to understand the flow of electricity, which eventually paved the path towards explaining electric potential and potential difference. Scientists finally began to understand how electric fields were actually affecting the charges and the surrounding environment. Benjamin Franklin first shocked himself in 1746, while conducting experiments on electricity with found objects from around his house. Six years later, or 261 years ago for us, the founding father flew a kite attached to a key and a silk ribbon in a thunderstorm and effectively trapped lightning in a jar. The experiment is now seen as a watershed moment in mankind&#039;s venture to channel a force of nature that was viewed quite abstractly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the time Franklin started experimenting with electricity, he&#039;d already found fame and fortune as the author of Poor Richard&#039;s Almanack. Electricity wasn&#039;t a very well understood phenomenon at that point, so Franklin&#039;s research proved to be fairly foundational. The early experiments, experts believe, were inspired by other scientists&#039; work and the shortcomings therein.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ep135.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
source: http://www.benjamin-franklin-history.org/kite-experiment/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That early brush with the dangers of electricity left an impression on Franklin. He described the sensation as &amp;quot;a universal blow throughout my whole body from head to foot, which seemed within as well as without; after which the first thing I took notice of was a violent quick shaking of my body.&amp;quot; However, it didn&#039;t scare him away. In the handful of years before his famous kite experiment, Franklin contributed everything from designing the first battery designs to establishing some common nomenclature in the study of electricity. Although Franklin is often coined the father of electricity, after he set the foundations of electricity, many other scientists contributed his or her research in the advancement of electricity and eventually led to the discovery of electric potential and potential difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like mentioned multiple times throughout the page, although electric potential is a huge and important topic, it has many branches, which makes the concept of electric potential difficult to stand alone. Even with this page, to support the concept of electric potential, many crucial branches of the topic appeared, like potential difference (which also branched into [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_Path_Independence,_claimed_by_Aditya_Mohile Potential Difference Path Independence]], [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_in_a_Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Uniform Field]], and [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_of_Point_Charge_in_a_Non-Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Nonuniform Field]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External Links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] https://www.khanacademy.org/test-prep/mcat/physical-processes/electrostatics-1/v/electric-potential-at-a-point-in-space&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pcWz4tP_zUw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vpa_uApmNoo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] https://www.khanacademy.org/science/electrical-engineering/ee-electrostatics/ee-fields-potential-voltage/a/ee-electric-potential-voltage&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] &amp;quot;Benjamin Franklin and Electricity.&amp;quot; Benjamin Franklin and Electricity. N.p., n.d. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.americaslibrary.gov/aa/franklinb/aa_franklinb_electric_1.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Bottyan, Thomas. &amp;quot;Electrostatic Potential Maps.&amp;quot; Chemwiki. N.p., 02 Oct. 2013. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://chemwiki.ucdavis.edu/Core/Theoretical_Chemistry/Chemical_Bonding/General_Principles_of_Chemical_Bonding/Electrostatic_Potential_maps&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] &amp;quot;Electric Potential Difference.&amp;quot; Electric Potential Difference. The Physics Classroom, n.d. Web. 14 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/circuits/Lesson-1/Electric-Potential-Difference&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] Harland, C. J., T. D. Clark, and R. J. Prance. &amp;quot;Applications of Electric Potential (Displacement Current) Sensors in Human Body Electrophysiology.&amp;quot; International Society for Industrial Process Tomography, n.d. Web. 16 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.isipt.org/world-congress/3/269.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] Sherwood, Bruce A. &amp;quot;2.1 The Momentum Principle.&amp;quot; Matter &amp;amp; Interactions. By Ruth W. Chabay. 4th ed. Vol. 1. N.p.: John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons, 2015. 45-50. Print. Modern Mechanics.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurence12799</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=38568</id>
		<title>Electric Potential</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=38568"/>
		<updated>2020-03-18T02:30:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurence12799: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039;, like all forms of potential energy, is the potential for work to be done, in this case by the electric force. The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential&#039;&#039;&#039; (frequently referred to as voltage, from its SI unit the Volt) is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Potential Energy&#039;&#039;&#039; associated with the test charge, such that it depends only on the source, just as the electric field is related to the electric force, but depends only on the source. One may similarly remember the parallel concept of the gravitational potential, which was gravitational potential energy divided by mass.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
===Externals links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Main Idea ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electric potential energy, like all forms of potential energy, is the potential for work to be done, in this case by the electric force. The electric potential (frequently referred to as voltage, from its SI unit the Volt) is the electric potential energy associated with the test charge, such that it depends only on the source, just as the electric field is related to the electric force, but depends only on the source. One may similarly remember the parallel concept of the gravitational potential, which was gravitational potential energy divided by mass.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
====Electric Potential Energy====&lt;br /&gt;
Electric potential energy may be calculated in a variety of manners, depending upon the situation. The electric potential energy between two point charges may be written in a form which follows directly from the definition of the Coulomb force:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = \frac{qQ}{4\pi\epsilon_0 r_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is the amount of energy which would be required to bring one of the charged objects (by convention the small &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; q &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; charge) from an infinite distance to its current position, where, by convention, the potential energy at infinity is equal to zero. This may, therefore, be derived from the equation for work:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Derivation with Calculus=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -W = -\int_\infty^{r_0} \vec{F}_E(r) \cdot \text{d} \vec{r} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -\int_\infty^{r_0} \frac{qQ \hat{r}}{4\pi\epsilon_0 r^2} \cdot \text{d} \vec{r} = -\frac{qQ}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\int_\infty^{r_0} \frac{\hat{r} \cdot \hat{r}}{r^2} \text{d} r &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = \frac{qQ}{4\pi \epsilon_0} \biggr{(} \frac{1}{r} \biggr{|}_{\infty}^{r_0} = \frac{qQ}{4\pi \epsilon_0 r_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Given our definition of the [[Electric Field]], we have that &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vec{F}_E(r) = q\vec{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
so the electric potential energy may be generally written as &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -q\int_a^b \vec{E} \cdot \text{d} \vec{r} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Linear assumption=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the above equation, one can see that if the electric field is constant over the length of the path, then electric potential energy may be written in a simplified manner as&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = q\vec{E}\cdot\Delta \vec{s} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Electric Potential====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just as we divided by charge to go from electric force to electric field, dividing by charge takes us from the electric potential energy to the electric potential. For a test particle of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; q &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we define &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; V = \frac{U}{q} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Derivation with Calculus=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is not especially meaningful without choosing a reference point, just as for potential energy. Thus, one may speak of the potential difference between two points, which is independent of the reference value. From the above definition of electric potential energy, it is possible to derive an expression for the potential difference between two points from the electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\int_a^b \vec{E} \cdot \text{d} \vec{s} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The vectors are used to express the path associated with this integral. The difference in electric potential will be the same no matter what path one takes, as explored in [[Path Independence of Electric Potential]]. This also allows one to write the inverse relationship, determining the electric field at a given point from the electric potential in one and three dimensions respectively:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; E = -\frac{\text{d}V}{\text{d}x}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vec{E} = -\nabla V &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \nabla &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the gradient operator.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Linear Assumption=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The above equations allow us to write the equivalent expressions under an assumption of constant values for the electric field, such that the integral reduces to &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\vec{E} \cdot \Delta \vec{l} = -(E_x \Delta x + E_y \Delta y + E_z \Delta z)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This also leads directly to the inverse expression:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vec{E} = -(\frac{\Delta V_x}{\Delta x} + \frac{\Delta V_y}{\Delta y} + \frac{\Delta V_z}{\Delta z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric potential difference in a field which is nonuniform, but whose variations are discrete, is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\sum \vec{E}\cdot \Delta\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The different parts in this particular equation resembles the equation for the potential difference in an uniform field, except that with the nonuniform field, the potential difference in the different fields are summed up. This situation can be quite easy, but when the system gets difficult, first, choose a path and divide it into smaller pieces of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;; second, write an expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -\vec{E}\cdot\Delta\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of one piece; third, add up the contributions of all the pieces; last, check the result to make sure the magnitude, direction, and units make sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is important to keep track of the sign differences. If the path follows the direction of the electric field, the sign of the potential difference will be negative. This may be imagined as dropping a positive test charge in an electric field: a positive charge will be accelerated in the direction of the field, meaning that it is gaining energy, and so its potential must be decreasing. By contrast, if the path is opposite the direction of the field, potential will be increasing, much like rolling a boulder up a hill. If the path is perpendicular to the direction of the electric field, the dot product will be equal to zero. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, when working with different situations, it is nice to keep in mind that in a conductor, the electric field is zero. Therefore, the potential difference is zero as well. In an insulator, the electric field is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{E_{applied}}{K}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the dielectric constant. Furthermore, the potential difference over a round trip is equal to zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
Click on the link to see Electric Potential through VPython!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Make sure to press &amp;quot;Run&amp;quot; to see the principle in action!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://trinket.io/embed/glowscript/0a7e486c94 Teach hand-on with GlowScript]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Watch this video for a more visual approach! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Rb9guSEeVE Electric Potential: Visualizing Voltage with 3D animations]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--== Models ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric potential of a particle at a point is equal to the potential difference of that particle with respect to infinity. Since we know how to calculate the potential difference using the formula, we can see that this implies that the electric potential at infinity is equal to zero. What does this mean? This means that a particle that is extremely far away has no potential energy. This makes sense, because a proton will not be affected by the electric field of another proton at a distance of infinity apart. This subtle detail aids in solving a case of problems types later on.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although electric potential is an important topic to learn, most problems encountered will not ask to find just the &amp;quot;electric potential,&amp;quot; instead, questions will most likely ask for the &amp;quot;electric potential difference.&amp;quot; This is because electric potential is measured using different locations, or more specifically pathways between the different locations, so instead of determining the electric potential of location A and the electric potential of final location B, it would make more sense to determine the &amp;quot;difference in electric potential between locations A and B.&amp;quot; The following mathematical model will further explain this. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like mentioned before, instead of electric potential, in most cases, electric potential difference is needed to be found. The general equation for the potential difference is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{{U}_{electric}} = {q} * ∆{V} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{{U}_{electric}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric potential energy, which is measured in Joules (J). &#039;&#039;&#039;q&#039;&#039;&#039; is the charge of the particle moving through the path of the electric potential difference, which is measured in coulombs (C). &#039;&#039;&#039;∆V&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric potential difference, which is measured in Joules per Coulomb (J/C), or just Volts (V).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Aside from the general equation, the electric potential difference can also be found in other ways. The potential difference in an &#039;&#039;&#039;uniform field&#039;&#039;&#039; is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{V} = -({E}_{x}∆{x} + {E}_{y}∆{y} + {E}_{z}∆{z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;, which can also be written as &#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{V} = -\vec{E}·∆\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the electric potential difference, which is measured in Joules per Coulomb (J/C), or just Volts (V). &#039;&#039;&#039;E&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric field, which is measured in Newtons per Coulomb (N/C), and it is important to note that the different direction components of the electric field are used in the equation. &#039;&#039;&#039;l&#039;&#039;&#039; (or the &#039;&#039;&#039;x&#039;&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;&#039;y&#039;&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;&#039;z&#039;&#039;&#039;) is the distance between the two described locations, which is measured in meters, and x, y, and z, are the different components of the difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, when working with different situations, it is nice to keep in mind that in a conductor, the electric field is zero. Therefore, the potential difference is zero as well. In an insulator, the electric field is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;{E}_{applied} / K&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; where &#039;&#039;&#039;K&#039;&#039;&#039; is the dielectric constant. Also, the round trip potential difference is always zero, or in other words, if you start from a certain point and end at the same point, then, the potential difference will be zero. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
In a capacitor, the negative charges are located on the left plate, and the positive charges are located on the right plate. Location A is at the left end of the capacitor, and Location B is at the right end of the capacitor, or in other words, Location A and B are only different in terms of their x component location. The path moves from A to B. What is the direction of the electric field? Is the potential difference positive or negative? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ep125.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer: The electric field is to the left. The potential difference is increasing, or is positive.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
The electric field always moves away from the positive charge and towards the negative charge, which means the electric field in this example is to the left. Because the direction and the electric field and the direction of the path are opposite, the potential difference is increasing, or is positive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Calculate the change in electric potential between point A, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(-4, 3,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and B, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(2,-2,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; . The electric field in the location is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; (50,0,0) \; N/C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:EP mid fig.png ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer: -300V&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta\vec{l}= (2,-2,0)\;m - (-4,3,0)\;m = (6,-5,0)\;m &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -({E}_{x}∆{x} + {E}_{y}∆{y} + {E}_{z}∆{z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -(50\; N/C \cdot 6 \;m + 0 \; N/c \cdot -5 \; m + 0\cdot 0)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -300 V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Bohr Model]] of the hydrogen atom treats it as a nucleus of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; +e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; electrons of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; orbiting in circular orbits of specific radii. Calculate the potential difference between two points, one infinitely far away from the nucleus, and the other one Bohr radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; away from the nucleus (don&#039;t worry about substituting in the values). Compute the electric potential energy associated with the electron one Bohr radius away from the nucleus, setting the potential energy at infinity as zero (remember the sign of the charge). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We may compute the electric potential by taking integrating the electric field of a point charge as the radius goes from infinity to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. This integral may be set up as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\int_\infty^{a_0} \vec{E}\cdot\text{d}\vec{l} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \int_\infty^{a_0} \frac{\text{d} r}{r^2} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This may then be solved:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\biggr{(}\frac{1}{r}\biggr{|}_\infty^{a_0} = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
to compute the potential energy, we now multiply by the charge of the electron: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, giving &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -\frac{e^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Depending on what physics or chemistry courses you may have taken before, this may be recognizable as twice the ionization energy of the n=1 orbital. The factor of two is due to the fact that in the Bohr model, the kinetic energy will be exactly half of this potential energy, and will be positive so that the net result is still negative, but with half the magnitude. This understanding of the hydrogen atom gets certain values right, but the reality of the situation is far more complicated. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is this topic connected to something that you are interested in?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am interested in robotic systems and building circuit boards and electrical systems for manufacturing robots. While studying this section in the book, I was able to connect back many of the concepts and calculations back to robotics and the electrical component of automated systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Since high school, I never really understood how to work with the voltmeter and what it measured, and I have always wanted to know, but although this particular wiki page did not go into the details and other branches of electric potential, it led me to find the answers to something I was interested in since high school, the concept of electric potential.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I think electively is really interesting. When I was younger, I participated in this demo where a group of people hold hands and someone touches this special ball full of charge. We all could feel the tingling sensation of the current passing through us. It’s cool to learn the theory behind the supposed magic that occurs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I think it&#039;s very interesting that electric potential can be seen as a property of a space and that we can have further applications using this property.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is it connected to your major?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am a Mechanical Engineering major, so I will be dealing with the electrical components of machines when I work. Therefore, I have to know these certain concepts such as electric potential in order to fully understand how they work and interact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revistionist] As a biochemistry major, electric potential and electric potential difference is not particularly related to my major, but in chemistry classes, we use electrostatic potential maps (electrostatic potential energy maps) that shows the charge distributions throughout a molecule. Although the main use in electric potential is different in physics and biochemistry (where physicists use it identify the effect of the electric field at a location), I still found it interesting as the concept of electric potential (buildup) was being used in quite a different way. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I am a computer science major. Although I deal mostly with software, the hardware aspect is still important. The algorithms that I design run differently on different machines. The time complexity of an algorithm is sometimes useless when worrying about constant factors that are determined by a system’s hardware. Quicksort, for instance, is usually faster than many other sorts that have lower time complexities. The hardware of computers heavily relies on electricity and current (which is induced by a potential difference) to switch transistors on and off and thereby process information. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I am an aerospace engineering major, and I think understanding such concepts will help me have a better holistic understanding towards fields and systems. In addition, the thinking behind solving related problems will help me better prepared for future classes that involve with solving dynamics problems. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Is there an interesting industrial application?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] Electrical potential is used to find the voltage across a path. This is useful when working with circuit components and attempting to manipulate the power output or current throughout a component.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Electric potential sensors are being used to detect a variety of electrical signals made by the human body, thus contributing to the field of electrophysiology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] The study of electric potential has lead scientists to generate very safe wires that will not overheat and cause fires. Connecting circuits to ground is important and the third prong in an electrical outlet is this ground connection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The idea of electric potential, in a way, started with Ben Franklin and his experiments in the 1740s. He began to understand the flow of electricity, which eventually paved the path towards explaining electric potential and potential difference. Scientists finally began to understand how electric fields were actually affecting the charges and the surrounding environment. Benjamin Franklin first shocked himself in 1746, while conducting experiments on electricity with found objects from around his house. Six years later, or 261 years ago for us, the founding father flew a kite attached to a key and a silk ribbon in a thunderstorm and effectively trapped lightning in a jar. The experiment is now seen as a watershed moment in mankind&#039;s venture to channel a force of nature that was viewed quite abstractly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the time Franklin started experimenting with electricity, he&#039;d already found fame and fortune as the author of Poor Richard&#039;s Almanack. Electricity wasn&#039;t a very well understood phenomenon at that point, so Franklin&#039;s research proved to be fairly foundational. The early experiments, experts believe, were inspired by other scientists&#039; work and the shortcomings therein.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ep135.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
source: http://www.benjamin-franklin-history.org/kite-experiment/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That early brush with the dangers of electricity left an impression on Franklin. He described the sensation as &amp;quot;a universal blow throughout my whole body from head to foot, which seemed within as well as without; after which the first thing I took notice of was a violent quick shaking of my body.&amp;quot; However, it didn&#039;t scare him away. In the handful of years before his famous kite experiment, Franklin contributed everything from designing the first battery designs to establishing some common nomenclature in the study of electricity. Although Franklin is often coined the father of electricity, after he set the foundations of electricity, many other scientists contributed his or her research in the advancement of electricity and eventually led to the discovery of electric potential and potential difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like mentioned multiple times throughout the page, although electric potential is a huge and important topic, it has many branches, which makes the concept of electric potential difficult to stand alone. Even with this page, to support the concept of electric potential, many crucial branches of the topic appeared, like potential difference (which also branched into [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_Path_Independence,_claimed_by_Aditya_Mohile Potential Difference Path Independence]], [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_in_a_Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Uniform Field]], and [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_of_Point_Charge_in_a_Non-Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Nonuniform Field]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External Links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] https://www.khanacademy.org/test-prep/mcat/physical-processes/electrostatics-1/v/electric-potential-at-a-point-in-space&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pcWz4tP_zUw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vpa_uApmNoo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] https://www.khanacademy.org/science/electrical-engineering/ee-electrostatics/ee-fields-potential-voltage/a/ee-electric-potential-voltage&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] &amp;quot;Benjamin Franklin and Electricity.&amp;quot; Benjamin Franklin and Electricity. N.p., n.d. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.americaslibrary.gov/aa/franklinb/aa_franklinb_electric_1.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Bottyan, Thomas. &amp;quot;Electrostatic Potential Maps.&amp;quot; Chemwiki. N.p., 02 Oct. 2013. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://chemwiki.ucdavis.edu/Core/Theoretical_Chemistry/Chemical_Bonding/General_Principles_of_Chemical_Bonding/Electrostatic_Potential_maps&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] &amp;quot;Electric Potential Difference.&amp;quot; Electric Potential Difference. The Physics Classroom, n.d. Web. 14 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/circuits/Lesson-1/Electric-Potential-Difference&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] Harland, C. J., T. D. Clark, and R. J. Prance. &amp;quot;Applications of Electric Potential (Displacement Current) Sensors in Human Body Electrophysiology.&amp;quot; International Society for Industrial Process Tomography, n.d. Web. 16 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.isipt.org/world-congress/3/269.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] Sherwood, Bruce A. &amp;quot;2.1 The Momentum Principle.&amp;quot; Matter &amp;amp; Interactions. By Ruth W. Chabay. 4th ed. Vol. 1. N.p.: John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons, 2015. 45-50. Print. Modern Mechanics.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurence12799</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=38567</id>
		<title>Electric Potential</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=38567"/>
		<updated>2020-03-18T02:27:56Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurence12799: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
===Externals links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Main Idea ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electric potential energy, like all forms of potential energy, is the potential for work to be done, in this case by the electric force. The electric potential (frequently referred to as voltage, from its SI unit the Volt) is the electric potential energy associated with the test charge, such that it depends only on the source, just as the electric field is related to the electric force, but depends only on the source. One may similarly remember the parallel concept of the gravitational potential, which was gravitational potential energy divided by mass.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
====Electric Potential Energy====&lt;br /&gt;
Electric potential energy may be calculated in a variety of manners, depending upon the situation. The electric potential energy between two point charges may be written in a form which follows directly from the definition of the Coulomb force:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = \frac{qQ}{4\pi\epsilon_0 r_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is the amount of energy which would be required to bring one of the charged objects (by convention the small &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; q &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; charge) from an infinite distance to its current position, where, by convention, the potential energy at infinity is equal to zero. This may, therefore, be derived from the equation for work:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Derivation with Calculus=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -W = -\int_\infty^{r_0} \vec{F}_E(r) \cdot \text{d} \vec{r} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -\int_\infty^{r_0} \frac{qQ \hat{r}}{4\pi\epsilon_0 r^2} \cdot \text{d} \vec{r} = -\frac{qQ}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\int_\infty^{r_0} \frac{\hat{r} \cdot \hat{r}}{r^2} \text{d} r &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = \frac{qQ}{4\pi \epsilon_0} \biggr{(} \frac{1}{r} \biggr{|}_{\infty}^{r_0} = \frac{qQ}{4\pi \epsilon_0 r_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Given our definition of the [[Electric Field]], we have that &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vec{F}_E(r) = q\vec{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
so the electric potential energy may be generally written as &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -q\int_a^b \vec{E} \cdot \text{d} \vec{r} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Linear assumption=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the above equation, one can see that if the electric field is constant over the length of the path, then electric potential energy may be written in a simplified manner as&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = q\vec{E}\cdot\Delta \vec{s} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Electric Potential====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just as we divided by charge to go from electric force to electric field, dividing by charge takes us from the electric potential energy to the electric potential. For a test particle of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; q &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we define &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; V = \frac{U}{q} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Derivation with Calculus=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is not especially meaningful without choosing a reference point, just as for potential energy. Thus, one may speak of the potential difference between two points, which is independent of the reference value. From the above definition of electric potential energy, it is possible to derive an expression for the potential difference between two points from the electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\int_a^b \vec{E} \cdot \text{d} \vec{s} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The vectors are used to express the path associated with this integral. The difference in electric potential will be the same no matter what path one takes, as explored in [[Path Independence of Electric Potential]]. This also allows one to write the inverse relationship, determining the electric field at a given point from the electric potential in one and three dimensions respectively:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; E = -\frac{\text{d}V}{\text{d}x}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vec{E} = -\nabla V &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \nabla &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the gradient operator.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Linear Assumption=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The above equations allow us to write the equivalent expressions under an assumption of constant values for the electric field, such that the integral reduces to &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\vec{E} \cdot \Delta \vec{l} = -(E_x \Delta x + E_y \Delta y + E_z \Delta z)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This also leads directly to the inverse expression:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vec{E} = -(\frac{\Delta V_x}{\Delta x} + \frac{\Delta V_y}{\Delta y} + \frac{\Delta V_z}{\Delta z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric potential difference in a field which is nonuniform, but whose variations are discrete, is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\sum \vec{E}\cdot \Delta\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The different parts in this particular equation resembles the equation for the potential difference in an uniform field, except that with the nonuniform field, the potential difference in the different fields are summed up. This situation can be quite easy, but when the system gets difficult, first, choose a path and divide it into smaller pieces of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;; second, write an expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -\vec{E}\cdot\Delta\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of one piece; third, add up the contributions of all the pieces; last, check the result to make sure the magnitude, direction, and units make sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is important to keep track of the sign differences. If the path follows the direction of the electric field, the sign of the potential difference will be negative. This may be imagined as dropping a positive test charge in an electric field: a positive charge will be accelerated in the direction of the field, meaning that it is gaining energy, and so its potential must be decreasing. By contrast, if the path is opposite the direction of the field, potential will be increasing, much like rolling a boulder up a hill. If the path is perpendicular to the direction of the electric field, the dot product will be equal to zero. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, when working with different situations, it is nice to keep in mind that in a conductor, the electric field is zero. Therefore, the potential difference is zero as well. In an insulator, the electric field is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{E_{applied}}{K}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the dielectric constant. Furthermore, the potential difference over a round trip is equal to zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
Click on the link to see Electric Potential through VPython!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Make sure to press &amp;quot;Run&amp;quot; to see the principle in action!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://trinket.io/embed/glowscript/0a7e486c94 Teach hand-on with GlowScript]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Watch this video for a more visual approach! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Rb9guSEeVE Electric Potential: Visualizing Voltage with 3D animations]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--== Models ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric potential of a particle at a point is equal to the potential difference of that particle with respect to infinity. Since we know how to calculate the potential difference using the formula, we can see that this implies that the electric potential at infinity is equal to zero. What does this mean? This means that a particle that is extremely far away has no potential energy. This makes sense, because a proton will not be affected by the electric field of another proton at a distance of infinity apart. This subtle detail aids in solving a case of problems types later on.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although electric potential is an important topic to learn, most problems encountered will not ask to find just the &amp;quot;electric potential,&amp;quot; instead, questions will most likely ask for the &amp;quot;electric potential difference.&amp;quot; This is because electric potential is measured using different locations, or more specifically pathways between the different locations, so instead of determining the electric potential of location A and the electric potential of final location B, it would make more sense to determine the &amp;quot;difference in electric potential between locations A and B.&amp;quot; The following mathematical model will further explain this. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like mentioned before, instead of electric potential, in most cases, electric potential difference is needed to be found. The general equation for the potential difference is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{{U}_{electric}} = {q} * ∆{V} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{{U}_{electric}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric potential energy, which is measured in Joules (J). &#039;&#039;&#039;q&#039;&#039;&#039; is the charge of the particle moving through the path of the electric potential difference, which is measured in coulombs (C). &#039;&#039;&#039;∆V&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric potential difference, which is measured in Joules per Coulomb (J/C), or just Volts (V).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Aside from the general equation, the electric potential difference can also be found in other ways. The potential difference in an &#039;&#039;&#039;uniform field&#039;&#039;&#039; is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{V} = -({E}_{x}∆{x} + {E}_{y}∆{y} + {E}_{z}∆{z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;, which can also be written as &#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{V} = -\vec{E}·∆\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the electric potential difference, which is measured in Joules per Coulomb (J/C), or just Volts (V). &#039;&#039;&#039;E&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric field, which is measured in Newtons per Coulomb (N/C), and it is important to note that the different direction components of the electric field are used in the equation. &#039;&#039;&#039;l&#039;&#039;&#039; (or the &#039;&#039;&#039;x&#039;&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;&#039;y&#039;&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;&#039;z&#039;&#039;&#039;) is the distance between the two described locations, which is measured in meters, and x, y, and z, are the different components of the difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, when working with different situations, it is nice to keep in mind that in a conductor, the electric field is zero. Therefore, the potential difference is zero as well. In an insulator, the electric field is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;{E}_{applied} / K&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; where &#039;&#039;&#039;K&#039;&#039;&#039; is the dielectric constant. Also, the round trip potential difference is always zero, or in other words, if you start from a certain point and end at the same point, then, the potential difference will be zero. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
In a capacitor, the negative charges are located on the left plate, and the positive charges are located on the right plate. Location A is at the left end of the capacitor, and Location B is at the right end of the capacitor, or in other words, Location A and B are only different in terms of their x component location. The path moves from A to B. What is the direction of the electric field? Is the potential difference positive or negative? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ep125.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer: The electric field is to the left. The potential difference is increasing, or is positive.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
The electric field always moves away from the positive charge and towards the negative charge, which means the electric field in this example is to the left. Because the direction and the electric field and the direction of the path are opposite, the potential difference is increasing, or is positive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Calculate the change in electric potential between point A, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(-4, 3,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and B, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(2,-2,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; . The electric field in the location is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; (50,0,0) \; N/C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:EP mid fig.png ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer: -300V&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta\vec{l}= (2,-2,0)\;m - (-4,3,0)\;m = (6,-5,0)\;m &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -({E}_{x}∆{x} + {E}_{y}∆{y} + {E}_{z}∆{z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -(50\; N/C \cdot 6 \;m + 0 \; N/c \cdot -5 \; m + 0\cdot 0)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -300 V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Bohr Model]] of the hydrogen atom treats it as a nucleus of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; +e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; electrons of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; orbiting in circular orbits of specific radii. Calculate the potential difference between two points, one infinitely far away from the nucleus, and the other one Bohr radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; away from the nucleus (don&#039;t worry about substituting in the values). Compute the electric potential energy associated with the electron one Bohr radius away from the nucleus, setting the potential energy at infinity as zero (remember the sign of the charge). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We may compute the electric potential by taking integrating the electric field of a point charge as the radius goes from infinity to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. This integral may be set up as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\int_\infty^{a_0} \vec{E}\cdot\text{d}\vec{l} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \int_\infty^{a_0} \frac{\text{d} r}{r^2} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This may then be solved:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\biggr{(}\frac{1}{r}\biggr{|}_\infty^{a_0} = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
to compute the potential energy, we now multiply by the charge of the electron: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, giving &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -\frac{e^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Depending on what physics or chemistry courses you may have taken before, this may be recognizable as twice the ionization energy of the n=1 orbital. The factor of two is due to the fact that in the Bohr model, the kinetic energy will be exactly half of this potential energy, and will be positive so that the net result is still negative, but with half the magnitude. This understanding of the hydrogen atom gets certain values right, but the reality of the situation is far more complicated. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is this topic connected to something that you are interested in?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am interested in robotic systems and building circuit boards and electrical systems for manufacturing robots. While studying this section in the book, I was able to connect back many of the concepts and calculations back to robotics and the electrical component of automated systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Since high school, I never really understood how to work with the voltmeter and what it measured, and I have always wanted to know, but although this particular wiki page did not go into the details and other branches of electric potential, it led me to find the answers to something I was interested in since high school, the concept of electric potential.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I think electively is really interesting. When I was younger, I participated in this demo where a group of people hold hands and someone touches this special ball full of charge. We all could feel the tingling sensation of the current passing through us. It’s cool to learn the theory behind the supposed magic that occurs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I think it&#039;s very interesting that electric potential can be seen as a property of a space and that we can have further applications using this property.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is it connected to your major?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am a Mechanical Engineering major, so I will be dealing with the electrical components of machines when I work. Therefore, I have to know these certain concepts such as electric potential in order to fully understand how they work and interact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revistionist] As a biochemistry major, electric potential and electric potential difference is not particularly related to my major, but in chemistry classes, we use electrostatic potential maps (electrostatic potential energy maps) that shows the charge distributions throughout a molecule. Although the main use in electric potential is different in physics and biochemistry (where physicists use it identify the effect of the electric field at a location), I still found it interesting as the concept of electric potential (buildup) was being used in quite a different way. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I am a computer science major. Although I deal mostly with software, the hardware aspect is still important. The algorithms that I design run differently on different machines. The time complexity of an algorithm is sometimes useless when worrying about constant factors that are determined by a system’s hardware. Quicksort, for instance, is usually faster than many other sorts that have lower time complexities. The hardware of computers heavily relies on electricity and current (which is induced by a potential difference) to switch transistors on and off and thereby process information. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I am an aerospace engineering major, and I think understanding such concepts will help me have a better holistic understanding towards fields and systems. In addition, the thinking behind solving related problems will help me better prepared for future classes that involve with solving dynamics problems. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Is there an interesting industrial application?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] Electrical potential is used to find the voltage across a path. This is useful when working with circuit components and attempting to manipulate the power output or current throughout a component.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Electric potential sensors are being used to detect a variety of electrical signals made by the human body, thus contributing to the field of electrophysiology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] The study of electric potential has lead scientists to generate very safe wires that will not overheat and cause fires. Connecting circuits to ground is important and the third prong in an electrical outlet is this ground connection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The idea of electric potential, in a way, started with Ben Franklin and his experiments in the 1740s. He began to understand the flow of electricity, which eventually paved the path towards explaining electric potential and potential difference. Scientists finally began to understand how electric fields were actually affecting the charges and the surrounding environment. Benjamin Franklin first shocked himself in 1746, while conducting experiments on electricity with found objects from around his house. Six years later, or 261 years ago for us, the founding father flew a kite attached to a key and a silk ribbon in a thunderstorm and effectively trapped lightning in a jar. The experiment is now seen as a watershed moment in mankind&#039;s venture to channel a force of nature that was viewed quite abstractly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the time Franklin started experimenting with electricity, he&#039;d already found fame and fortune as the author of Poor Richard&#039;s Almanack. Electricity wasn&#039;t a very well understood phenomenon at that point, so Franklin&#039;s research proved to be fairly foundational. The early experiments, experts believe, were inspired by other scientists&#039; work and the shortcomings therein.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ep135.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
source: http://www.benjamin-franklin-history.org/kite-experiment/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That early brush with the dangers of electricity left an impression on Franklin. He described the sensation as &amp;quot;a universal blow throughout my whole body from head to foot, which seemed within as well as without; after which the first thing I took notice of was a violent quick shaking of my body.&amp;quot; However, it didn&#039;t scare him away. In the handful of years before his famous kite experiment, Franklin contributed everything from designing the first battery designs to establishing some common nomenclature in the study of electricity. Although Franklin is often coined the father of electricity, after he set the foundations of electricity, many other scientists contributed his or her research in the advancement of electricity and eventually led to the discovery of electric potential and potential difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like mentioned multiple times throughout the page, although electric potential is a huge and important topic, it has many branches, which makes the concept of electric potential difficult to stand alone. Even with this page, to support the concept of electric potential, many crucial branches of the topic appeared, like potential difference (which also branched into [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_Path_Independence,_claimed_by_Aditya_Mohile Potential Difference Path Independence]], [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_in_a_Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Uniform Field]], and [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_of_Point_Charge_in_a_Non-Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Nonuniform Field]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External Links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] https://www.khanacademy.org/test-prep/mcat/physical-processes/electrostatics-1/v/electric-potential-at-a-point-in-space&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pcWz4tP_zUw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vpa_uApmNoo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] https://www.khanacademy.org/science/electrical-engineering/ee-electrostatics/ee-fields-potential-voltage/a/ee-electric-potential-voltage&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] &amp;quot;Benjamin Franklin and Electricity.&amp;quot; Benjamin Franklin and Electricity. N.p., n.d. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.americaslibrary.gov/aa/franklinb/aa_franklinb_electric_1.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Bottyan, Thomas. &amp;quot;Electrostatic Potential Maps.&amp;quot; Chemwiki. N.p., 02 Oct. 2013. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://chemwiki.ucdavis.edu/Core/Theoretical_Chemistry/Chemical_Bonding/General_Principles_of_Chemical_Bonding/Electrostatic_Potential_maps&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] &amp;quot;Electric Potential Difference.&amp;quot; Electric Potential Difference. The Physics Classroom, n.d. Web. 14 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/circuits/Lesson-1/Electric-Potential-Difference&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] Harland, C. J., T. D. Clark, and R. J. Prance. &amp;quot;Applications of Electric Potential (Displacement Current) Sensors in Human Body Electrophysiology.&amp;quot; International Society for Industrial Process Tomography, n.d. Web. 16 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.isipt.org/world-congress/3/269.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] Sherwood, Bruce A. &amp;quot;2.1 The Momentum Principle.&amp;quot; Matter &amp;amp; Interactions. By Ruth W. Chabay. 4th ed. Vol. 1. N.p.: John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons, 2015. 45-50. Print. Modern Mechanics.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurence12799</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Field&amp;diff=38490</id>
		<title>Electric Field</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Field&amp;diff=38490"/>
		<updated>2020-02-10T15:04:45Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurence12799: /* A Mathematical Model */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
In this page, the concept of an &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; produced by an electric point charge will be described qualitatively and quantitatively through models, examples, and a simulation. An &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; is a useful concept to describe how any charged particle would affect charge around it through the Coulomb Force. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; of a point charge is spherically symmetric, meaning it is the same at all points of equal radius from the source. Hence, it is useful to speak of the electric field at a certain radius (not at a certain &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y,z)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; position), which will be done in [[electric Field#A Mathematical Model| the mathematical model]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Keep in mind, the electric field is a vector quantity, meaning it has a magnitude and direction. The SI units are N/C.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bigl( \mathbf{E}_{s} \bigl)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of a point source charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bigl( Q_{s} \bigl)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; gives the magnitude and direction of the Electrostatic Force vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bigl( \mathbf{F}_{s} \bigl)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; exerted on a unit charge (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; Coulomb) by &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q_{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as a function of position &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bigl( \mathbf{r} = (x,y,z) \bigl)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. More generally however, the Electrostatic Force vector exerted on any point charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bigl( q \bigl)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; by a point source charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bigl( Q_{s} \bigl)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is related to the source charge&#039;s &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; vector by:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{F}_{s} ( \mathbf{r} ) = |q| \mathbf{E}_{s} ( \mathbf{r} )&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This definition requires an understanding of the Electrostatic Force (Coulomb&#039;s Law), and its mathematical description. If you are not familiar with this yet, read over the [[Electric Force]] page and come back.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the Electric Force is defined as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{F}( \mathbf{r} ) = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_{o}}\frac{|q_{1} q_{2}|}{r^{2}} \hat{\mathbf{r}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\epsilon_{o}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the permittivity of free space with a value of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;8.854 \times 10^{-12} \frac{\text{C}^2}{\text{N} \cdot \text{m}^2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are point charges one and two, respectively&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the distance between the two point charges, which can also be written as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;|\mathbf{r}|&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, the magnitude of the vector connecting the two charges&#039; positions&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat{\mathbf{r}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the unit vector pointing from charge one to charge two, or from charge two to charge one, depending on whether the force on charge two or charge one is wanted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; of a source charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q_{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{E}_{s} ( \mathbf{r}) &amp;amp; = \frac{\mathbf{F}_{s} ( \mathbf{r} )}{|q|} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp; = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_{o}}\frac{|Q_{s}|}{r^{2}}\hat{\mathbf{r}}&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Radially, the magnitude of a point charge&#039;s &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; looks something like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MagnitudeofEField.jpg|center|700px|thumb|&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;2 \times 10^{-15} \ \text{C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; charge&#039;s &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; magnitude as a function of radius.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A point charge&#039;s &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; is also related to its Electric Potential. If you are unfamiliar with the idea of electric potential, then review these pages ([[Electric Field and Electric Potential]] and [[Electric Potential]]) and come back.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A charge&#039;s &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; and Electric Potential &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are related by:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = -\int_{\mathbf{b}}^{\mathbf{a}} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the potential difference between points &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{a}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{b}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is an infinitesimal length along the path between &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{a}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{b}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This relation is less useful for us unless we use a straight line approximation, such that:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
V_{ab} &amp;amp; = -\mathbf{E} \cdot \Delta \mathbf{L} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp; = - \bigl( E_{x}, E_{y}, E_{z} \bigl) \cdot \bigl( \Delta L_{x}, \Delta L_{y}, \Delta L_{z} \bigl) \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp; = - \bigl( E_{x}\Delta L_{x} + E_{y}\Delta L_{y} + E_{z}\Delta L_{z} \bigl) \\&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This leads to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} (x,y,z) = - \biggl( \frac{\Delta V_{x}}{\Delta L_{x}}, \frac{\Delta V_{y}}{\Delta L_{y}}, \frac{\Delta V_{z}}{\Delta L_{z}} \biggl)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By convention, the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; due to a positive point charge always points away from itself, and the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; of a negative point charge always points towards itself as shown below:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Posandnegefield.png|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Opposite charges will attract each other, and like charges will repel each other, as shown below:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Multiplechargeefield.png|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lastly, the Principle of Superposition is directly applicable to finding the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; due to multiple point source charges, using the a vector sum:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{E}_{sum} (\mathbf{r}) &amp;amp; = \mathbf{E}_{1} + \mathbf{E}_{2} + \mathbf{E}_{3} + \cdots + \mathbf{E}_{N} \\ &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp; = \sum_{1}^{N} \mathbf{E}_{n} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp; = \sum_{1}^{N} \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{o}} \frac{|Q_{s_{n}}|}{r_{n}^{2}} \hat{\mathbf{r}}_n&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::*When using this, be careful to take note that the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; of a negative charge points in the opposite direction as a positive charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Critical Formulas:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} ( \mathbf{r}) = \frac{\mathbf{F} ( \mathbf{r} )}{|q|}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
**&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} ( \mathbf{r}) = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_{o}}\frac{|Q|}{r^{2}}\hat{\mathbf{r}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
**&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} (x,y,z) = - \biggl( \frac{\Delta V_{x}}{\Delta L_{x}}, \frac{\Delta V_{y}}{\Delta L_{y}}, \frac{\Delta V_{z}}{\Delta L_{z}} \biggl)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
**&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{sum} (\mathbf{r}) = \sum_{1}^{N} \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{o}} \frac{|Q_{s_{n}}|}{r_{n}^{2}} \hat{\mathbf{r}}_n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:NormalEField.png|right|250px|thumb|Normal view of simulated electric field]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    ###--Create Electric Field Lines of a Positive Charge at the Origin--###&lt;br /&gt;
    #==============================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Import statements for VPython---#&lt;br /&gt;
    from __future__ import division&lt;br /&gt;
    from visual import *&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Import function used to find combinations---#&lt;br /&gt;
    from itertools import combinations&lt;br /&gt;
    #==============================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Create scene---#&lt;br /&gt;
    scene.center = vector(0,0,0)  #-Position of source charge-#&lt;br /&gt;
    scene.height = 800  #-Set height of frame of scene-#&lt;br /&gt;
    scene.width = 800  #-Set width of frame of scene-#&lt;br /&gt;
    scene.range = 4  #-Set range of scene-#&lt;br /&gt;
    scene.userzoom = 1  #-Allow user to zoom in/out: CTRL &amp;amp; move in/out on trackpad-#&lt;br /&gt;
    scene.userspin = 1  #-Allow user to rotate camera angle: SHIFT &amp;amp; OPTION &amp;amp; move around on track pad-#&lt;br /&gt;
    #==============================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Specify point charge attributes---#&lt;br /&gt;
    sourceCharge = 3*10**(-11)  #-Coulombs of charge-#&lt;br /&gt;
    sourcePos = vector(0,0,0) #-Position of source charge-#&lt;br /&gt;
    ###--Modeling source point charge as a sphere with radius 0.1 meters--###&lt;br /&gt;
    sourceObj = sphere(pos = sourcePos, radius = 0.1, color = color.cyan)&lt;br /&gt;
    #==============================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Set range (0 to 3) and possible inputs for the coordinates (0.5 step)---#&lt;br /&gt;
    ###--Many of the same number included to allow for combinations such as (1,1,1).&lt;br /&gt;
        #The itertools.combinations function will only use each element of the...&lt;br /&gt;
        #list once, starting from the beginning.&lt;br /&gt;
        #Repeating each coordinate many times with intermixing, grants...&lt;br /&gt;
    [[File:CenteredAndDistantEField.png|right|250px|thumb|Distant view of simulated electric field]]&lt;br /&gt;
        #all combinations of points, with repeats however.&lt;br /&gt;
        #Later, a for loop will be used to eliminate repeats.&lt;br /&gt;
        #This can be optimized later if need be.---------------###&lt;br /&gt;
    posXYZ = [0, -0.5, 1, -1.5, 2, -2.5, 3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, 0.5, -1, 1.5, -2, 2.5, -3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, -0.5, 1, -1.5, 2, -2.5, 3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, 0.5, -1, 1.5, -2, 2.5, -3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, -0.5, 1, -1.5, 2, -2.5, 3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, 0.5, -1, 1.5, -2, 2.5, -3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, -0.5, 1, -1.5, 2, -2.5, 3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, 0.5, -1, 1.5, -2, 2.5, -3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, -0.5, 1, -1.5, 2, -2.5, 3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, 0.5, -1, 1.5, -2, 2.5, -3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, -0.5, 1, -1.5, 2, -2.5, 3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, 0.5, -1, 1.5, -2, 2.5, -3]&lt;br /&gt;
    #==============================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:RotatedAndZoomedInEField.png|right|250px|thumb|Rotated and zoomed in view of simulated electric field]]&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Create combinations of points (x,y,z) for later use---#&lt;br /&gt;
        ###--prelimPoints will be a list of tuples of tuples--##&lt;br /&gt;
            #ie: [((,,),(,,),(,,),(,,)) , ((,,),(,,)) ,..., ((,,),(,,))]&lt;br /&gt;
    prelimPoints = [tuple(combinations(posXYZ, 3))]&lt;br /&gt;
    ###--Pull the points out of the grouping tuples and add them to a...&lt;br /&gt;
        #new list alphaPoints------------------------###&lt;br /&gt;
    alphaPoints = []&lt;br /&gt;
    for groupingTuple in prelimPoints:&lt;br /&gt;
        for XYZ in groupingTuple:&lt;br /&gt;
            if XYZ not in alphaPoints:  #-Check for repeat (x,y,z)-#&lt;br /&gt;
                alphaPoints.append(XYZ)&lt;br /&gt;
            ##--The negative of this tuple may not be in the combinations:&lt;br /&gt;
                #check to see-------------##&lt;br /&gt;
            first = -XYZ[0]&lt;br /&gt;
            second = -XYZ[1]&lt;br /&gt;
            third = -XYZ[2]&lt;br /&gt;
            negXYZ = (first, second, third)&lt;br /&gt;
            if negXYZ not in alphaPoints:&lt;br /&gt;
                alphaPoints.append(negXYZ)&lt;br /&gt;
            ##--Swap x and z coordinates for futher combination checking--##&lt;br /&gt;
            first = XYZ[2]&lt;br /&gt;
            second = XYZ[1]&lt;br /&gt;
            third = XYZ[0]&lt;br /&gt;
            reverseXYZ = (first, second, third)&lt;br /&gt;
            if reverseXYZ not in alphaPoints:&lt;br /&gt;
                alphaPoints.append(reverseXYZ)&lt;br /&gt;
            ##--The negative of the x and z coordinate swap may not be in...&lt;br /&gt;
                #the combinations: check to see---------##&lt;br /&gt;
            first = -XYZ[2]&lt;br /&gt;
            second = -XYZ[1]&lt;br /&gt;
            third = -XYZ[0]&lt;br /&gt;
            reverseXYZneg = (first, second, third)&lt;br /&gt;
            if reverseXYZneg not in alphaPoints:&lt;br /&gt;
                alphaPoints.append(reverseXYZneg)&lt;br /&gt;
            ##--Make x [3], y [0], and z [1] to check for more combinations--##&lt;br /&gt;
            first = XYZ[1]&lt;br /&gt;
            second = XYZ[2]&lt;br /&gt;
            third = XYZ[0]&lt;br /&gt;
            shiftedXYZ = (first, second, third)&lt;br /&gt;
            if shiftedXYZ not in alphaPoints:&lt;br /&gt;
                alphaPoints.append(shiftedXYZ)&lt;br /&gt;
            ##--The negative of the shifted XYZ may not be in the combinations:&lt;br /&gt;
                #check to see---------------##&lt;br /&gt;
            first = -XYZ[1]&lt;br /&gt;
            second = -XYZ[2]&lt;br /&gt;
            third = -XYZ[0]&lt;br /&gt;
            shiftedXYZneg = (first, second, third)&lt;br /&gt;
            if shiftedXYZneg not in alphaPoints:&lt;br /&gt;
                alphaPoints.append(shiftedXYZneg)&lt;br /&gt;
    ###--------This should be enough recombining---------###&lt;br /&gt;
    #================================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SideAngleAndTopViewEField.png|right|250px|thumb|Rotated top view of simulated electric field]]&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Create a new list of tuples that contain the points, magnitude,...&lt;br /&gt;
        #and direction (betaPoints)-----------#&lt;br /&gt;
            #ie: [((x,y,z), mag((x,y,z)), norm((x,y,z))),...]&lt;br /&gt;
    betaPoints = []&lt;br /&gt;
    for XYZ in alphaPoints:&lt;br /&gt;
        Mag = mag(XYZ)&lt;br /&gt;
        Dir = norm(XYZ)&lt;br /&gt;
        betaPoints.append((XYZ, Mag, Dir))&lt;br /&gt;
    #================================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Sort the tuples based on their magnitudes from least to greatest...&lt;br /&gt;
       #using sorted().&lt;br /&gt;
            #key = lamda x: x[1] tells the sorted function to sort the tuples...&lt;br /&gt;
                #based on their second component...their magnitudes--------#&lt;br /&gt;
    charliePoints = sorted(betaPoints, key = lambda x: x[1])&lt;br /&gt;
    #================================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Calculate parts of electric field equation:&lt;br /&gt;
        #E = 1/(4*pi*epsilon0) * Q/(magnitude)**2&lt;br /&gt;
    epsilonO = 8.854*(10**(-12)) #-N*(m/C)**2-#&lt;br /&gt;
    k = 1/(4*pi*(epsilonO)) #-N*(m/C)**2-#&lt;br /&gt;
    chargeContri = k*sourceCharge #-N*(m**2/C)-#&lt;br /&gt;
    #================================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Loop through points and find mag of electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
        #add it to a new list with the existing tuple info-------#&lt;br /&gt;
    deltaPoints = []&lt;br /&gt;
    for XYZ in charliePoints:&lt;br /&gt;
        try:  ###-Avoid divide by 0 error in (x,y,z) = (0,0,0)-###&lt;br /&gt;
            magEfield = chargeContri*(1/(XYZ[1])**2)&lt;br /&gt;
        except:&lt;br /&gt;
            magEfield = 0&lt;br /&gt;
        tupEfield = (XYZ[0], XYZ[1], XYZ[2], magEfield)&lt;br /&gt;
        deltaPoints.append(tupEfield)&lt;br /&gt;
    #================================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SIdeAngleAndSideViewEField.png|right|250px|thumb|Side angle of simulated electric field]]&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Loop through points and create an arrow at that point proportional in...&lt;br /&gt;
        #length to the magnitude of the electric field there.&lt;br /&gt;
        #Also, the arrow points in the direction of the electric field there.&lt;br /&gt;
        #Color coding is based on 0.25 meter increments:&lt;br /&gt;
            #stronger field = redder; weaker field = blue&lt;br /&gt;
    for XYZ in deltaPoints:&lt;br /&gt;
        if XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 0.25:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*0.5&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.000, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*0.2,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*0.25)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 0.5:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*0.7&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.200, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*0.2,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*0.25)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 1:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*0.9&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.300, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*0.2,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*0.25)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 1.25:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*1.1&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.400, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*0.2,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*0.25)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 1.5:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*1.3&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.500, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*1,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*1)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 1.75:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*1.5&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.600, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*1,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*1)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 2:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*1.7&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.700, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*1,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*1)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 2.25:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*1.9&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.800, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*1,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*1)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 2.5:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*2.1&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.900, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*1,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*1)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 2.75:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*2.3&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 1.000, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*1,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*1)&lt;br /&gt;
        else:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*2.5&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = color.blue,&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*1,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Also, at this link [https://phet.colorado.edu/en/simulation/charges-and-fields Charges and Fields] is a PhET simulation of &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Fields&#039;&#039;&#039;. Play with it if you like.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Question&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
::In the following figure, the red circles represent positive point charges, and the blue circles represent negative point charges. If the yellow arrows are meant to represent the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; due to each point charge, &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;which field(s) and charge(s) are correctly matched?&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039; (Only take into account direction)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricFieldSimpleExample.png|600px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Solution&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
::Since &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; lines always point away from a positive point charge, Option (C.) cannot be correct. Likewise, &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; lines always point towards a negative charge. Therefore, Option (A.) is also incorrect.&lt;br /&gt;
::Option (B.) shows a positive charge with an &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; pointing radially outwards. This is correct. Option (D.) shows a negative charge with an &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; pointing radially inwards. This is also correct.&lt;br /&gt;
:::&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer:&#039;&#039;&#039; Options (B.) &amp;amp; (D.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Question&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:: Four point charges &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\big(q_{1}, q_{2}, q_{3}, \text{and} \ q_{4} \big)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, are each located at a distance &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; along either the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; or &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; axes, as shown in the figure below. &lt;br /&gt;
:*&#039;&#039;&#039;A.)&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;What is the net Electric Field at the origin?&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:*&#039;&#039;&#039;B.)&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;If &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\ |q_{3}| = |q_{1}| \ \text{and} \ |q_{4}| = |q_{2}|&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; what does the Electric Field at the origin reduce to?&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricFieldMiddlingExample.png|600px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Solution&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:*&#039;&#039;&#039;A.)&#039;&#039;&#039; To find the net &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; at the origin, we must first find the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; due to each charge at the origin. &lt;br /&gt;
::*Starting with &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, its general &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; can be described as:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{1} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{1}|}{r_{1}^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}}_{1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is measured relative to the location of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
::::The origin is a distance &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; away from &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, which is along the y-axis. Since it is a positive charge, its &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; at the origin will point &amp;quot;down&amp;quot; the y-axis (away from the charge):&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{1} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{1}|}{d^2} (-\mathbf{j})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{j}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the unit vector in the y-direction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*For &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; we have:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{2} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{2}|}{r_{2}^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}}_{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is measured relative to the location of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
::::The origin is a distance &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; away from &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, which is along the x-axis. Since it is a positive charge, its &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; at the origin will point to the left (away from the charge):&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{2} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{2}|}{d^2} (-\mathbf{i})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{i}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the unit vector in the x-direction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*For &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; we have:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{3} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{3}|}{r_{3}^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}}_{3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is measured relative to the location of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
::::The origin is a distance &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; away from &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, which is along the y-axis. Since it is a negative charge, its &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; at the origin will point &amp;quot;down&amp;quot; the y-axis (towards the charge):&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{3} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{3}|}{d^2} (-\mathbf{j})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{j}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the same unit vector in the y-direction from earlier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*For &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{4}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the electric field is:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{4} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{4}|}{r_{4}^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}}_{4}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{4}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is measured relative to the location of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{4}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
::::The origin is a distance &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; away from &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{4}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, which is along the x-axis. Since it is a positive charge, its &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; at the origin will point to the right (away from the charge):&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{4} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{4}|}{d^2} (\mathbf{i})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{i}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the same unit vector in the x-direction from earlier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Now that we have the four &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Fields&#039;&#039;&#039; present at the origin, we can use the Principle of Superposition to find the &#039;&#039;&#039;net&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; at the origin:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{E}_{net} &amp;amp;= \mathbf{E}_{1} + \mathbf{E}_{2} + \mathbf{E}_{3} + \mathbf{E}_{4} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{1}|}{d^2} (-\mathbf{j}) + \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{2}|}{d^2} (-\mathbf{i}) + \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{3}|}{d^2} (-\mathbf{j}) + \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{4}|}{d^2} (\mathbf{i}) \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} \Big[ -|q_{1}| \mathbf{j} -|q_{2}| \mathbf{i} -|q_{3}| \mathbf{j} + |q_{4}| \mathbf{i} \Big] \\&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{E}_{net} &amp;amp;= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} \Big[ \big( |q_{4}| - |q_{2}| \big)\mathbf{i} - \big( |q_{1}| + |q_{3}| \big)\mathbf{j} \Big]&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricFieldMiddlingExampleAnswer.png|400px|right|thumb|Part &#039;&#039;&#039;(B)&#039;&#039;&#039; answer]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*&#039;&#039;&#039;B.)&#039;&#039;&#039; We will simply plug in the specified values into our answer from &#039;&#039;&#039;(A)&#039;&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{E}_{net} &amp;amp;= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} \Big[ \big( |q_{4}| - |q_{2}| \big)\mathbf{i} - \big( |q_{1}| + |q_{3}| \big)\mathbf{j} \Big] \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} \Big[ \big( |q_{2}| - |q_{2}| \big)\mathbf{i} - \big( |q_{1}| + |q_{1}| \big)\mathbf{j} \Big] \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} \Big[ 0 \mathbf{i} - 2|q_{1}| \mathbf{j} \Big] \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} \Big[ - 2|q_{1}| \mathbf{j} \Big] \\&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{E}_{net} &amp;amp;= - \frac{1}{2 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} |q_{1}| \mathbf{j} \\&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:::*&#039;&#039;&#039;A.)&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{net} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} \Big[ \big( |q_{4}| - |q_{2}| \big)\mathbf{i} - \big( |q_{1}| + |q_{3}| \big)\mathbf{j} \Big]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::*&#039;&#039;&#039;B.)&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{net} = - \frac{1}{2 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} |q_{1}| \mathbf{j}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Question&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
::A ring of evenly distributed charge of radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is centered on the origin in the xy-plane. The ring has a total charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;Show that the Electric Field due to this ring is 0 at the origin.&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricFieldDifficultExample.png|600px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Solution&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
::The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; due to a point charge is given by:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|Q|}{| \mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;} |^{2}} \frac{\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;}}{| \mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;} |}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::This equation is equivalent to the formula presented in the [[Electric Field#A Mathematical Model | Mathematical Model]]. The reason it looks so different is due to a few assumptions in the mathematical model that we have stopped using:&lt;br /&gt;
:::# The source charge is located at the origin (our ring of charge is around the origin)&lt;br /&gt;
:::# The distance between the source charge and the observing location is simply expressed as a distance &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (like in the [[Electric Field#Middling| Middling Example]]). Now, instead we will represent the distance as the magnitude of the difference in position between the source and observer &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\big( | \mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;} | \big)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
:::# Subsequently, our unit vector in the direction of the field &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\big( \hat{\mathbf{r}} \big)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is not simply expressed as a typical unit vector (like in the middling example). It has now become the vector joining the source and observer divided by the magnitude of this same vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bigg( \frac{\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;}}{| \mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;} |} \bigg) &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Another complication this problem presents is:&lt;br /&gt;
::::Where is the source charge?&lt;br /&gt;
:::To answer this, notice that the ring has an evenly distributed TOTAL charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and a radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Also, notice that the &amp;quot;source&amp;quot; position is constantly changing as you go around the ring. This issue makes it much more convenient to speak of the line charge DENSITY at a point along the ring instead of the TOTAL charge. This will allow us to treat the ring as many, many little source charges. The line charge density is simply the charge on the line divided by the length of that line (circumference), since the charge is evenly distributed about the ring:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\rho_{L} = \frac{Q}{2 \pi a}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This allows us to represent a differential amount of source charge as a product of the line charge density and a differential length:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;dQ = \rho_{L} dL&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The next question is: What is a differential length around the ring?&lt;br /&gt;
:::The differential length is a differential arc length &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(s = r \theta)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; around the circle dependent on the change in angle:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;dL = a d\theta&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
dQ &amp;amp;= \frac{Q}{2 \pi a} a d\theta \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= \frac{Q}{2 \pi} d\theta \\&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Now we can sum each of these differential source charge&#039;s contribution to the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; at the origin using an integral:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} = \int \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{\frac{Q}{2 \pi} d\theta}{| \mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;} |^{2}} \frac{\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;}}{| \mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;} |}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The only things left to find are the generic source position (a vector that can describe the position of each differential source charge along the ring) and the observer location. The observer location is given to us; the origin:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{r} = 0\mathbf{i} +0\mathbf{j} + 0\mathbf{k}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The source position is easiest to describe as a radius from the origin (polar coordinates):&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{r}^{&#039;} = a \hat{ \mathbf{a}}_{r}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat{\mathbf{a}}_{r}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a unit vector in the radial direction&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;} &amp;amp;= \big( 0\mathbf{i} +0\mathbf{j} + 0\mathbf{k} \big) - \big( a\hat{ \mathbf{a}}_{r} \big) \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= -a\hat{ \mathbf{a}}_{r} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;}| &amp;amp;= \sqrt{(-a)^{2}} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= a \\&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Plugging these into the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; integral gives:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{E} &amp;amp;= \int \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{\frac{Q}{2 \pi} d\theta}{a^2} \frac{-a \hat{ \mathbf{a}}_{r}}{a} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= - \int \frac{1}{8 {\pi}^{2} \epsilon_{0}} \frac{Q}{a^2} \hat{ \mathbf{a}}_{r} d\theta \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= - \frac{Q}{a^{2} 8 {\pi}^{2} \epsilon_{0}} \int \hat{ \mathbf{a}}_{r} d\theta \\&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\theta&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the angle from the x-axis. &lt;br /&gt;
::*To integrate over the entire ring, we set the bounds of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\theta&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;[0, 2 \pi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
::*Also, as of right now, the integral would not evaluate to 0. This is because &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat{ \mathbf{a}}_{r}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; has a hidden dependence on &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\theta&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat{ \mathbf{a}}_{r} = \text{cos}( \theta) \mathbf{i} + \text{sin}( \theta) \mathbf{j}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Plugging this information in gives:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{alignat}{3}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{E} &amp;amp;= - \frac{Q}{a^{2} 8 {\pi}^{2} \epsilon_{0}} \int_{0}^{2 \pi} \big( \text{cos}( \theta) \mathbf{i} + \text{sin}( \theta) \mathbf{j} \big) d\theta \\&lt;br /&gt;
\int_{0}^{2 \pi} \text{cos}( \theta) \mathbf{i} \ d\theta &amp;amp;= 0 \\&lt;br /&gt;
\int_{0}^{2 \pi} \text{sin}( \theta) \mathbf{j} \ d\theta &amp;amp;= 0 \\&lt;br /&gt;
\end{alignat}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} = 0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at the origin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
The real world applications of electric fields are endless. Here are some:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:electricmotor.jpg|400px|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Motors:&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Electric motors convert Electrical Energy into Mechanical Energy through &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Fields&#039;&#039;&#039;. Whenever electric motors are turned on, &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Fields&#039;&#039;&#039; are generated. This is because in order to turn an electric motor, an &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; must first be generated, which then generates a Magnetic Field, thus making the motor spin. Electric motors are used in cars, elevators, fans, refrigerators, and many more applications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Computers:&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Computers use circuits, electric fans, and transistors to work. All of these use &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Fields&#039;&#039;&#039; to push charge through a circuit, spin fans, and allow logic to be implemented in electronics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Painting:&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Fields&#039;&#039;&#039; are also used in some paintings. The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; generates charges on the surface of the material being painted on, and an opposite charge is generated on the paint. Paint that touches the material sticks, and excess paint falls off to go back into the system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Cancer Treatment:&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Recently, weak &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Fields&#039;&#039;&#039; have been used to kill cancer cells. This treatment works best for brain and breast cancers, and it has no effect on normal cells. In lab and animal tests, this treatment killed cancer cells of every type tested; however, this is still a developing treatment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Fields&#039;&#039;&#039; are created by Electric charges. The original discovery of the Electric charge is not explicitly known, but in 1675 the esteemed chemist Robert Boyle, known for Boyle&#039;s Law, discovered the attraction and repulsion of certain particles in a vacuum. Almost 100 years later in the 18th century, the American Benjamin Franklin first coined the phrases &#039;positive&#039; and &#039;negative&#039; (later developed into proton and electron) for these particles with attractive and repulsive properties. Finally, in the 19th century Michael Faraday utilized his Electrolysis process to discover the discrete nature of Electric charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
The ability to understand &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Fields&#039;&#039;&#039; helps set the basis for the introduction to [[Electric Force]] (as we discussed &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \mathbf{F}  = q\mathbf{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; ). The introduction of Electric Force will attach the specific charge of the particles with the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; that they produce, resulting in the Electric Force. Electric Force will lay the ground work for understanding the force that particles have in different systems and environments, and eventually lead to the introduction of [[Magnetic Force]].&lt;br /&gt;
The understanding of &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Fields&#039;&#039;&#039; is a doorway into many various fields, only some of which will be covered in Physics 2212. The fundamental understanding of &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Fields&#039;&#039;&#039; will prove to be very important further along when Magnetic Fields are introduced, as they share many qualities. The understanding of Electric and Magnetic Fields will be used throughout the semester to learn about various Electromagnetic concepts, and ultimately to understanding and apply Maxwell&#039;s Equations. &lt;br /&gt;
Please see related topics:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Electric Potential]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Electric Force]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Lorentz Force]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Electric Polarization]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Charged Ring]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EPIhhbwbCNc&amp;amp;list=PLX2gX-ftPVXUcMGbk1A7UbNtgadPsK5BD&amp;amp;index=9 A Youtube Playlist That Does A Great Job Going Step By Step And Reviewing Topics]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/estatics/Lesson-4/Electric-Field-Lines Further Review On Electric Field Lines.] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://phet.colorado.edu/en/simulation/charges-and-fields Get A Better Understanding Of Fields Through Hands On Manipulation In PhET. This Can Be Very Helpful For Getting An Intuitive Understanding Of Fields.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_field Wikipedia Electric Field]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://openstax.org/details/books/university-physics-volume-2 OpenStax Volume on Electricity and Magnetism]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Hayt &amp;amp; Buck 9th Edition Engineering Electromagnetics&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Matter and Interactions&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurence12799</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Field&amp;diff=38489</id>
		<title>Electric Field</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Field&amp;diff=38489"/>
		<updated>2020-02-10T15:02:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurence12799: /* Difficult */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
In this page, the concept of an &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; produced by an electric point charge will be described qualitatively and quantitatively through models, examples, and a simulation. An &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; is a useful concept to describe how any charged particle would affect charge around it through the Coulomb Force. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; of a point charge is spherically symmetric, meaning it is the same at all points of equal radius from the source. Hence, it is useful to speak of the electric field at a certain radius (not at a certain &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y,z)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; position), which will be done in [[electric Field#A Mathematical Model| the mathematical model]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Keep in mind, the electric field is a vector quantity, meaning it has a magnitude and direction. The SI units are N/C.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bigl( \mathbf{E}_{s} \bigl)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of a point source charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bigl( Q_{s} \bigl)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; gives the magnitude and direction of the Electrostatic Force vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bigl( \mathbf{F}_{s} \bigl)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; exerted on a unit charge (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; Coulomb) by &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q_{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as a function of position &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bigl( \mathbf{r} = (x,y,z) \bigl)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. More generally however, the Electrostatic Force vector exerted on any point charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bigl( q \bigl)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; by a point source charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bigl( Q_{s} \bigl)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is related to the source charge&#039;s &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; vector by:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{F}_{s} ( \mathbf{r} ) = |q| \mathbf{E}_{s} ( \mathbf{r} )&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This definition requires an understanding of the Electrostatic Force (Coulomb&#039;s Law), and its mathematical description. If you are not familiar with this yet, read over the [[Electric Force]] page and come back.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the Electric Force is defined as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{F}( \mathbf{r} ) = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_{o}}\frac{|q_{1} q_{2}|}{r^{2}} \hat{\mathbf{r}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\epsilon_{o}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the permittivity of free space with a value of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;8.854 \times 10^{-12} \frac{\text{C}^2}{\text{N} \cdot \text{m}^2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are point charges one and two, respectively&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the distance between the two point charges, which can also be written as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;|\mathbf{r}|&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, the magnitude of the vector connecting the two charges&#039; positions&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat{\mathbf{r}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the unit vector pointing from charge one to charge two, or from charge two to charge one, depending on whether the force on charge two or charge one is wanted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; of a source charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q_{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{E}_{s} ( \mathbf{r}) &amp;amp; = \frac{\mathbf{F}_{s} ( \mathbf{r} )}{|q|} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp; = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_{o}}\frac{|Q_{s}|}{r^{2}}\hat{\mathbf{r}}&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Radially, the magnitude of a point charge&#039;s &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; looks something like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MagnitudeofEField.jpg|center|700px|thumb|&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;2 \times 10^{-15} \ \text{C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; charge&#039;s electric field magnitude as a function of radius.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A point charge&#039;s &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; is also related to its Electric Potential. If you are unfamiliar with the idea of electric potential, then review these pages ([[Electric Field and Electric Potential]] and [[Electric Potential]]) and come back.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A charge&#039;s &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; and Electric Potential &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are related by:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = -\int_{\mathbf{b}}^{\mathbf{a}} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the potential difference between points &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{a}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{b}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is an infinitesimal length along the path between &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{a}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{b}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This relation is less useful for us unless we use a straight line approximation, such that:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
V_{ab} &amp;amp; = -\mathbf{E} \cdot \Delta \mathbf{L} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp; = - \bigl( E_{x}, E_{y}, E_{z} \bigl) \cdot \bigl( \Delta L_{x}, \Delta L_{y}, \Delta L_{z} \bigl) \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp; = - \bigl( E_{x}\Delta L_{x} + E_{y}\Delta L_{y} + E_{z}\Delta L_{z} \bigl) \\&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This leads to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} (x,y,z) = - \biggl( \frac{\Delta V_{x}}{\Delta L_{x}}, \frac{\Delta V_{y}}{\Delta L_{y}}, \frac{\Delta V_{z}}{\Delta L_{z}} \biggl)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By convention, the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; due to a positive point charge always points away from itself, and the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; of a negative point charge always points towards itself as shown below:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Posandnegefield.png|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Opposite charges will attract each other, and like charges will repel each other, as shown below:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Multiplechargeefield.png|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lastly, the Principle of Superposition is directly applicable to finding the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; due to multiple point source charges, using the a vector sum:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{E}_{sum} (\mathbf{r}) &amp;amp; = \mathbf{E}_{1} + \mathbf{E}_{2} + \mathbf{E}_{3} + \cdots + \mathbf{E}_{N} \\ &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp; = \sum_{1}^{N} \mathbf{E}_{n} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp; = \sum_{1}^{N} \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{o}} \frac{|Q_{s_{n}}|}{r_{n}^{2}} \hat{\mathbf{r}}_n&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::*When using this, be careful to take note that the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; of a negative charge points in the opposite direction as a positive charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Critical Formulas:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} ( \mathbf{r}) = \frac{\mathbf{F} ( \mathbf{r} )}{|q|}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
**&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} ( \mathbf{r}) = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_{o}}\frac{|Q|}{r^{2}}\hat{\mathbf{r}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
**&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} (x,y,z) = - \biggl( \frac{\Delta V_{x}}{\Delta L_{x}}, \frac{\Delta V_{y}}{\Delta L_{y}}, \frac{\Delta V_{z}}{\Delta L_{z}} \biggl)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
**&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{sum} (\mathbf{r}) = \sum_{1}^{N} \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{o}} \frac{|Q_{s_{n}}|}{r_{n}^{2}} \hat{\mathbf{r}}_n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:NormalEField.png|right|250px|thumb|Normal view of simulated electric field]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    ###--Create Electric Field Lines of a Positive Charge at the Origin--###&lt;br /&gt;
    #==============================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Import statements for VPython---#&lt;br /&gt;
    from __future__ import division&lt;br /&gt;
    from visual import *&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Import function used to find combinations---#&lt;br /&gt;
    from itertools import combinations&lt;br /&gt;
    #==============================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Create scene---#&lt;br /&gt;
    scene.center = vector(0,0,0)  #-Position of source charge-#&lt;br /&gt;
    scene.height = 800  #-Set height of frame of scene-#&lt;br /&gt;
    scene.width = 800  #-Set width of frame of scene-#&lt;br /&gt;
    scene.range = 4  #-Set range of scene-#&lt;br /&gt;
    scene.userzoom = 1  #-Allow user to zoom in/out: CTRL &amp;amp; move in/out on trackpad-#&lt;br /&gt;
    scene.userspin = 1  #-Allow user to rotate camera angle: SHIFT &amp;amp; OPTION &amp;amp; move around on track pad-#&lt;br /&gt;
    #==============================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Specify point charge attributes---#&lt;br /&gt;
    sourceCharge = 3*10**(-11)  #-Coulombs of charge-#&lt;br /&gt;
    sourcePos = vector(0,0,0) #-Position of source charge-#&lt;br /&gt;
    ###--Modeling source point charge as a sphere with radius 0.1 meters--###&lt;br /&gt;
    sourceObj = sphere(pos = sourcePos, radius = 0.1, color = color.cyan)&lt;br /&gt;
    #==============================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Set range (0 to 3) and possible inputs for the coordinates (0.5 step)---#&lt;br /&gt;
    ###--Many of the same number included to allow for combinations such as (1,1,1).&lt;br /&gt;
        #The itertools.combinations function will only use each element of the...&lt;br /&gt;
        #list once, starting from the beginning.&lt;br /&gt;
        #Repeating each coordinate many times with intermixing, grants...&lt;br /&gt;
    [[File:CenteredAndDistantEField.png|right|250px|thumb|Distant view of simulated electric field]]&lt;br /&gt;
        #all combinations of points, with repeats however.&lt;br /&gt;
        #Later, a for loop will be used to eliminate repeats.&lt;br /&gt;
        #This can be optimized later if need be.---------------###&lt;br /&gt;
    posXYZ = [0, -0.5, 1, -1.5, 2, -2.5, 3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, 0.5, -1, 1.5, -2, 2.5, -3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, -0.5, 1, -1.5, 2, -2.5, 3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, 0.5, -1, 1.5, -2, 2.5, -3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, -0.5, 1, -1.5, 2, -2.5, 3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, 0.5, -1, 1.5, -2, 2.5, -3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, -0.5, 1, -1.5, 2, -2.5, 3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, 0.5, -1, 1.5, -2, 2.5, -3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, -0.5, 1, -1.5, 2, -2.5, 3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, 0.5, -1, 1.5, -2, 2.5, -3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, -0.5, 1, -1.5, 2, -2.5, 3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, 0.5, -1, 1.5, -2, 2.5, -3]&lt;br /&gt;
    #==============================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:RotatedAndZoomedInEField.png|right|250px|thumb|Rotated and zoomed in view of simulated electric field]]&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Create combinations of points (x,y,z) for later use---#&lt;br /&gt;
        ###--prelimPoints will be a list of tuples of tuples--##&lt;br /&gt;
            #ie: [((,,),(,,),(,,),(,,)) , ((,,),(,,)) ,..., ((,,),(,,))]&lt;br /&gt;
    prelimPoints = [tuple(combinations(posXYZ, 3))]&lt;br /&gt;
    ###--Pull the points out of the grouping tuples and add them to a...&lt;br /&gt;
        #new list alphaPoints------------------------###&lt;br /&gt;
    alphaPoints = []&lt;br /&gt;
    for groupingTuple in prelimPoints:&lt;br /&gt;
        for XYZ in groupingTuple:&lt;br /&gt;
            if XYZ not in alphaPoints:  #-Check for repeat (x,y,z)-#&lt;br /&gt;
                alphaPoints.append(XYZ)&lt;br /&gt;
            ##--The negative of this tuple may not be in the combinations:&lt;br /&gt;
                #check to see-------------##&lt;br /&gt;
            first = -XYZ[0]&lt;br /&gt;
            second = -XYZ[1]&lt;br /&gt;
            third = -XYZ[2]&lt;br /&gt;
            negXYZ = (first, second, third)&lt;br /&gt;
            if negXYZ not in alphaPoints:&lt;br /&gt;
                alphaPoints.append(negXYZ)&lt;br /&gt;
            ##--Swap x and z coordinates for futher combination checking--##&lt;br /&gt;
            first = XYZ[2]&lt;br /&gt;
            second = XYZ[1]&lt;br /&gt;
            third = XYZ[0]&lt;br /&gt;
            reverseXYZ = (first, second, third)&lt;br /&gt;
            if reverseXYZ not in alphaPoints:&lt;br /&gt;
                alphaPoints.append(reverseXYZ)&lt;br /&gt;
            ##--The negative of the x and z coordinate swap may not be in...&lt;br /&gt;
                #the combinations: check to see---------##&lt;br /&gt;
            first = -XYZ[2]&lt;br /&gt;
            second = -XYZ[1]&lt;br /&gt;
            third = -XYZ[0]&lt;br /&gt;
            reverseXYZneg = (first, second, third)&lt;br /&gt;
            if reverseXYZneg not in alphaPoints:&lt;br /&gt;
                alphaPoints.append(reverseXYZneg)&lt;br /&gt;
            ##--Make x [3], y [0], and z [1] to check for more combinations--##&lt;br /&gt;
            first = XYZ[1]&lt;br /&gt;
            second = XYZ[2]&lt;br /&gt;
            third = XYZ[0]&lt;br /&gt;
            shiftedXYZ = (first, second, third)&lt;br /&gt;
            if shiftedXYZ not in alphaPoints:&lt;br /&gt;
                alphaPoints.append(shiftedXYZ)&lt;br /&gt;
            ##--The negative of the shifted XYZ may not be in the combinations:&lt;br /&gt;
                #check to see---------------##&lt;br /&gt;
            first = -XYZ[1]&lt;br /&gt;
            second = -XYZ[2]&lt;br /&gt;
            third = -XYZ[0]&lt;br /&gt;
            shiftedXYZneg = (first, second, third)&lt;br /&gt;
            if shiftedXYZneg not in alphaPoints:&lt;br /&gt;
                alphaPoints.append(shiftedXYZneg)&lt;br /&gt;
    ###--------This should be enough recombining---------###&lt;br /&gt;
    #================================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SideAngleAndTopViewEField.png|right|250px|thumb|Rotated top view of simulated electric field]]&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Create a new list of tuples that contain the points, magnitude,...&lt;br /&gt;
        #and direction (betaPoints)-----------#&lt;br /&gt;
            #ie: [((x,y,z), mag((x,y,z)), norm((x,y,z))),...]&lt;br /&gt;
    betaPoints = []&lt;br /&gt;
    for XYZ in alphaPoints:&lt;br /&gt;
        Mag = mag(XYZ)&lt;br /&gt;
        Dir = norm(XYZ)&lt;br /&gt;
        betaPoints.append((XYZ, Mag, Dir))&lt;br /&gt;
    #================================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Sort the tuples based on their magnitudes from least to greatest...&lt;br /&gt;
       #using sorted().&lt;br /&gt;
            #key = lamda x: x[1] tells the sorted function to sort the tuples...&lt;br /&gt;
                #based on their second component...their magnitudes--------#&lt;br /&gt;
    charliePoints = sorted(betaPoints, key = lambda x: x[1])&lt;br /&gt;
    #================================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Calculate parts of electric field equation:&lt;br /&gt;
        #E = 1/(4*pi*epsilon0) * Q/(magnitude)**2&lt;br /&gt;
    epsilonO = 8.854*(10**(-12)) #-N*(m/C)**2-#&lt;br /&gt;
    k = 1/(4*pi*(epsilonO)) #-N*(m/C)**2-#&lt;br /&gt;
    chargeContri = k*sourceCharge #-N*(m**2/C)-#&lt;br /&gt;
    #================================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Loop through points and find mag of electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
        #add it to a new list with the existing tuple info-------#&lt;br /&gt;
    deltaPoints = []&lt;br /&gt;
    for XYZ in charliePoints:&lt;br /&gt;
        try:  ###-Avoid divide by 0 error in (x,y,z) = (0,0,0)-###&lt;br /&gt;
            magEfield = chargeContri*(1/(XYZ[1])**2)&lt;br /&gt;
        except:&lt;br /&gt;
            magEfield = 0&lt;br /&gt;
        tupEfield = (XYZ[0], XYZ[1], XYZ[2], magEfield)&lt;br /&gt;
        deltaPoints.append(tupEfield)&lt;br /&gt;
    #================================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SIdeAngleAndSideViewEField.png|right|250px|thumb|Side angle of simulated electric field]]&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Loop through points and create an arrow at that point proportional in...&lt;br /&gt;
        #length to the magnitude of the electric field there.&lt;br /&gt;
        #Also, the arrow points in the direction of the electric field there.&lt;br /&gt;
        #Color coding is based on 0.25 meter increments:&lt;br /&gt;
            #stronger field = redder; weaker field = blue&lt;br /&gt;
    for XYZ in deltaPoints:&lt;br /&gt;
        if XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 0.25:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*0.5&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.000, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*0.2,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*0.25)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 0.5:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*0.7&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.200, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*0.2,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*0.25)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 1:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*0.9&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.300, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*0.2,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*0.25)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 1.25:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*1.1&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.400, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*0.2,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*0.25)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 1.5:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*1.3&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.500, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*1,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*1)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 1.75:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*1.5&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.600, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*1,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*1)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 2:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*1.7&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.700, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*1,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*1)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 2.25:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*1.9&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.800, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*1,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*1)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 2.5:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*2.1&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.900, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*1,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*1)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 2.75:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*2.3&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 1.000, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*1,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*1)&lt;br /&gt;
        else:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*2.5&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = color.blue,&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*1,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Also, at this link [https://phet.colorado.edu/en/simulation/charges-and-fields Charges and Fields] is a PhET simulation of &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Fields&#039;&#039;&#039;. Play with it if you like.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Question&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
::In the following figure, the red circles represent positive point charges, and the blue circles represent negative point charges. If the yellow arrows are meant to represent the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; due to each point charge, &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;which field(s) and charge(s) are correctly matched?&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039; (Only take into account direction)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricFieldSimpleExample.png|600px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Solution&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
::Since &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; lines always point away from a positive point charge, Option (C.) cannot be correct. Likewise, &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; lines always point towards a negative charge. Therefore, Option (A.) is also incorrect.&lt;br /&gt;
::Option (B.) shows a positive charge with an &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; pointing radially outwards. This is correct. Option (D.) shows a negative charge with an &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; pointing radially inwards. This is also correct.&lt;br /&gt;
:::&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer:&#039;&#039;&#039; Options (B.) &amp;amp; (D.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Question&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:: Four point charges &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\big(q_{1}, q_{2}, q_{3}, \text{and} \ q_{4} \big)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, are each located at a distance &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; along either the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; or &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; axes, as shown in the figure below. &lt;br /&gt;
:*&#039;&#039;&#039;A.)&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;What is the net Electric Field at the origin?&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:*&#039;&#039;&#039;B.)&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;If &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\ |q_{3}| = |q_{1}| \ \text{and} \ |q_{4}| = |q_{2}|&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; what does the Electric Field at the origin reduce to?&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricFieldMiddlingExample.png|600px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Solution&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:*&#039;&#039;&#039;A.)&#039;&#039;&#039; To find the net &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; at the origin, we must first find the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; due to each charge at the origin. &lt;br /&gt;
::*Starting with &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, its general &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; can be described as:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{1} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{1}|}{r_{1}^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}}_{1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is measured relative to the location of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
::::The origin is a distance &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; away from &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, which is along the y-axis. Since it is a positive charge, its &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; at the origin will point &amp;quot;down&amp;quot; the y-axis (away from the charge):&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{1} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{1}|}{d^2} (-\mathbf{j})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{j}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the unit vector in the y-direction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*For &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; we have:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{2} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{2}|}{r_{2}^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}}_{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is measured relative to the location of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
::::The origin is a distance &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; away from &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, which is along the x-axis. Since it is a positive charge, its &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; at the origin will point to the left (away from the charge):&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{2} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{2}|}{d^2} (-\mathbf{i})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{i}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the unit vector in the x-direction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*For &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; we have:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{3} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{3}|}{r_{3}^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}}_{3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is measured relative to the location of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
::::The origin is a distance &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; away from &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, which is along the y-axis. Since it is a negative charge, its &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; at the origin will point &amp;quot;down&amp;quot; the y-axis (towards the charge):&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{3} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{3}|}{d^2} (-\mathbf{j})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{j}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the same unit vector in the y-direction from earlier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*For &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{4}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the electric field is:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{4} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{4}|}{r_{4}^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}}_{4}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{4}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is measured relative to the location of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{4}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
::::The origin is a distance &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; away from &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{4}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, which is along the x-axis. Since it is a positive charge, its &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; at the origin will point to the right (away from the charge):&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{4} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{4}|}{d^2} (\mathbf{i})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{i}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the same unit vector in the x-direction from earlier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Now that we have the four &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Fields&#039;&#039;&#039; present at the origin, we can use the Principle of Superposition to find the &#039;&#039;&#039;net&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; at the origin:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{E}_{net} &amp;amp;= \mathbf{E}_{1} + \mathbf{E}_{2} + \mathbf{E}_{3} + \mathbf{E}_{4} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{1}|}{d^2} (-\mathbf{j}) + \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{2}|}{d^2} (-\mathbf{i}) + \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{3}|}{d^2} (-\mathbf{j}) + \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{4}|}{d^2} (\mathbf{i}) \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} \Big[ -|q_{1}| \mathbf{j} -|q_{2}| \mathbf{i} -|q_{3}| \mathbf{j} + |q_{4}| \mathbf{i} \Big] \\&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{E}_{net} &amp;amp;= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} \Big[ \big( |q_{4}| - |q_{2}| \big)\mathbf{i} - \big( |q_{1}| + |q_{3}| \big)\mathbf{j} \Big]&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricFieldMiddlingExampleAnswer.png|400px|right|thumb|Part &#039;&#039;&#039;(B)&#039;&#039;&#039; answer]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*&#039;&#039;&#039;B.)&#039;&#039;&#039; We will simply plug in the specified values into our answer from &#039;&#039;&#039;(A)&#039;&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{E}_{net} &amp;amp;= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} \Big[ \big( |q_{4}| - |q_{2}| \big)\mathbf{i} - \big( |q_{1}| + |q_{3}| \big)\mathbf{j} \Big] \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} \Big[ \big( |q_{2}| - |q_{2}| \big)\mathbf{i} - \big( |q_{1}| + |q_{1}| \big)\mathbf{j} \Big] \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} \Big[ 0 \mathbf{i} - 2|q_{1}| \mathbf{j} \Big] \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} \Big[ - 2|q_{1}| \mathbf{j} \Big] \\&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{E}_{net} &amp;amp;= - \frac{1}{2 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} |q_{1}| \mathbf{j} \\&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:::*&#039;&#039;&#039;A.)&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{net} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} \Big[ \big( |q_{4}| - |q_{2}| \big)\mathbf{i} - \big( |q_{1}| + |q_{3}| \big)\mathbf{j} \Big]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::*&#039;&#039;&#039;B.)&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{net} = - \frac{1}{2 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} |q_{1}| \mathbf{j}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Question&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
::A ring of evenly distributed charge of radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is centered on the origin in the xy-plane. The ring has a total charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;Show that the Electric Field due to this ring is 0 at the origin.&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricFieldDifficultExample.png|600px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Solution&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
::The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; due to a point charge is given by:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|Q|}{| \mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;} |^{2}} \frac{\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;}}{| \mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;} |}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::This equation is equivalent to the formula presented in the [[Electric Field#A Mathematical Model | Mathematical Model]]. The reason it looks so different is due to a few assumptions in the mathematical model that we have stopped using:&lt;br /&gt;
:::# The source charge is located at the origin (our ring of charge is around the origin)&lt;br /&gt;
:::# The distance between the source charge and the observing location is simply expressed as a distance &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (like in the [[Electric Field#Middling| Middling Example]]). Now, instead we will represent the distance as the magnitude of the difference in position between the source and observer &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\big( | \mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;} | \big)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
:::# Subsequently, our unit vector in the direction of the field &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\big( \hat{\mathbf{r}} \big)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is not simply expressed as a typical unit vector (like in the middling example). It has now become the vector joining the source and observer divided by the magnitude of this same vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bigg( \frac{\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;}}{| \mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;} |} \bigg) &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Another complication this problem presents is:&lt;br /&gt;
::::Where is the source charge?&lt;br /&gt;
:::To answer this, notice that the ring has an evenly distributed TOTAL charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and a radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Also, notice that the &amp;quot;source&amp;quot; position is constantly changing as you go around the ring. This issue makes it much more convenient to speak of the line charge DENSITY at a point along the ring instead of the TOTAL charge. This will allow us to treat the ring as many, many little source charges. The line charge density is simply the charge on the line divided by the length of that line (circumference), since the charge is evenly distributed about the ring:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\rho_{L} = \frac{Q}{2 \pi a}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This allows us to represent a differential amount of source charge as a product of the line charge density and a differential length:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;dQ = \rho_{L} dL&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The next question is: What is a differential length around the ring?&lt;br /&gt;
:::The differential length is a differential arc length &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(s = r \theta)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; around the circle dependent on the change in angle:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;dL = a d\theta&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
dQ &amp;amp;= \frac{Q}{2 \pi a} a d\theta \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= \frac{Q}{2 \pi} d\theta \\&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Now we can sum each of these differential source charge&#039;s contribution to the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; at the origin using an integral:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} = \int \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{\frac{Q}{2 \pi} d\theta}{| \mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;} |^{2}} \frac{\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;}}{| \mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;} |}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The only things left to find are the generic source position (a vector that can describe the position of each differential source charge along the ring) and the observer location. The observer location is given to us; the origin:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{r} = 0\mathbf{i} +0\mathbf{j} + 0\mathbf{k}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The source position is easiest to describe as a radius from the origin (polar coordinates):&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{r}^{&#039;} = a \hat{ \mathbf{a}}_{r}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat{\mathbf{a}}_{r}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a unit vector in the radial direction&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;} &amp;amp;= \big( 0\mathbf{i} +0\mathbf{j} + 0\mathbf{k} \big) - \big( a\hat{ \mathbf{a}}_{r} \big) \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= -a\hat{ \mathbf{a}}_{r} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;}| &amp;amp;= \sqrt{(-a)^{2}} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= a \\&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Plugging these into the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; integral gives:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{E} &amp;amp;= \int \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{\frac{Q}{2 \pi} d\theta}{a^2} \frac{-a \hat{ \mathbf{a}}_{r}}{a} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= - \int \frac{1}{8 {\pi}^{2} \epsilon_{0}} \frac{Q}{a^2} \hat{ \mathbf{a}}_{r} d\theta \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= - \frac{Q}{a^{2} 8 {\pi}^{2} \epsilon_{0}} \int \hat{ \mathbf{a}}_{r} d\theta \\&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\theta&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the angle from the x-axis. &lt;br /&gt;
::*To integrate over the entire ring, we set the bounds of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\theta&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;[0, 2 \pi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
::*Also, as of right now, the integral would not evaluate to 0. This is because &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat{ \mathbf{a}}_{r}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; has a hidden dependence on &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\theta&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat{ \mathbf{a}}_{r} = \text{cos}( \theta) \mathbf{i} + \text{sin}( \theta) \mathbf{j}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Plugging this information in gives:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{alignat}{3}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{E} &amp;amp;= - \frac{Q}{a^{2} 8 {\pi}^{2} \epsilon_{0}} \int_{0}^{2 \pi} \big( \text{cos}( \theta) \mathbf{i} + \text{sin}( \theta) \mathbf{j} \big) d\theta \\&lt;br /&gt;
\int_{0}^{2 \pi} \text{cos}( \theta) \mathbf{i} \ d\theta &amp;amp;= 0 \\&lt;br /&gt;
\int_{0}^{2 \pi} \text{sin}( \theta) \mathbf{j} \ d\theta &amp;amp;= 0 \\&lt;br /&gt;
\end{alignat}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} = 0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at the origin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
The real world applications of electric fields are endless. Here are some:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:electricmotor.jpg|400px|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Motors:&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Electric motors convert Electrical Energy into Mechanical Energy through &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Fields&#039;&#039;&#039;. Whenever electric motors are turned on, &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Fields&#039;&#039;&#039; are generated. This is because in order to turn an electric motor, an &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; must first be generated, which then generates a Magnetic Field, thus making the motor spin. Electric motors are used in cars, elevators, fans, refrigerators, and many more applications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Computers:&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Computers use circuits, electric fans, and transistors to work. All of these use &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Fields&#039;&#039;&#039; to push charge through a circuit, spin fans, and allow logic to be implemented in electronics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Painting:&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Fields&#039;&#039;&#039; are also used in some paintings. The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; generates charges on the surface of the material being painted on, and an opposite charge is generated on the paint. Paint that touches the material sticks, and excess paint falls off to go back into the system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Cancer Treatment:&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Recently, weak &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Fields&#039;&#039;&#039; have been used to kill cancer cells. This treatment works best for brain and breast cancers, and it has no effect on normal cells. In lab and animal tests, this treatment killed cancer cells of every type tested; however, this is still a developing treatment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Fields&#039;&#039;&#039; are created by Electric charges. The original discovery of the Electric charge is not explicitly known, but in 1675 the esteemed chemist Robert Boyle, known for Boyle&#039;s Law, discovered the attraction and repulsion of certain particles in a vacuum. Almost 100 years later in the 18th century, the American Benjamin Franklin first coined the phrases &#039;positive&#039; and &#039;negative&#039; (later developed into proton and electron) for these particles with attractive and repulsive properties. Finally, in the 19th century Michael Faraday utilized his Electrolysis process to discover the discrete nature of Electric charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
The ability to understand &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Fields&#039;&#039;&#039; helps set the basis for the introduction to [[Electric Force]] (as we discussed &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \mathbf{F}  = q\mathbf{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; ). The introduction of Electric Force will attach the specific charge of the particles with the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; that they produce, resulting in the Electric Force. Electric Force will lay the ground work for understanding the force that particles have in different systems and environments, and eventually lead to the introduction of [[Magnetic Force]].&lt;br /&gt;
The understanding of &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Fields&#039;&#039;&#039; is a doorway into many various fields, only some of which will be covered in Physics 2212. The fundamental understanding of &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Fields&#039;&#039;&#039; will prove to be very important further along when Magnetic Fields are introduced, as they share many qualities. The understanding of Electric and Magnetic Fields will be used throughout the semester to learn about various Electromagnetic concepts, and ultimately to understanding and apply Maxwell&#039;s Equations. &lt;br /&gt;
Please see related topics:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Electric Potential]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Electric Force]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Lorentz Force]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Electric Polarization]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Charged Ring]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EPIhhbwbCNc&amp;amp;list=PLX2gX-ftPVXUcMGbk1A7UbNtgadPsK5BD&amp;amp;index=9 A Youtube Playlist That Does A Great Job Going Step By Step And Reviewing Topics]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/estatics/Lesson-4/Electric-Field-Lines Further Review On Electric Field Lines.] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://phet.colorado.edu/en/simulation/charges-and-fields Get A Better Understanding Of Fields Through Hands On Manipulation In PhET. This Can Be Very Helpful For Getting An Intuitive Understanding Of Fields.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_field Wikipedia Electric Field]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://openstax.org/details/books/university-physics-volume-2 OpenStax Volume on Electricity and Magnetism]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Hayt &amp;amp; Buck 9th Edition Engineering Electromagnetics&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Matter and Interactions&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurence12799</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Field&amp;diff=38488</id>
		<title>Electric Field</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Field&amp;diff=38488"/>
		<updated>2020-02-09T21:16:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurence12799: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
In this page, the concept of an &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; produced by an electric point charge will be described qualitatively and quantitatively through models, examples, and a simulation. An &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; is a useful concept to describe how any charged particle would affect charge around it through the Coulomb Force. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; of a point charge is spherically symmetric, meaning it is the same at all points of equal radius from the source. Hence, it is useful to speak of the electric field at a certain radius (not at a certain &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y,z)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; position), which will be done in [[electric Field#A Mathematical Model| the mathematical model]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Keep in mind, the electric field is a vector quantity, meaning it has a magnitude and direction. The SI units are N/C.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bigl( \mathbf{E}_{s} \bigl)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of a point source charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bigl( Q_{s} \bigl)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; gives the magnitude and direction of the Electrostatic Force vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bigl( \mathbf{F}_{s} \bigl)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; exerted on a unit charge (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; Coulomb) by &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q_{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as a function of position &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bigl( \mathbf{r} = (x,y,z) \bigl)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. More generally however, the Electrostatic Force vector exerted on any point charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bigl( q \bigl)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; by a point source charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bigl( Q_{s} \bigl)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is related to the source charge&#039;s &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; vector by:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{F}_{s} ( \mathbf{r} ) = |q| \mathbf{E}_{s} ( \mathbf{r} )&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This definition requires an understanding of the Electrostatic Force (Coulomb&#039;s Law), and its mathematical description. If you are not familiar with this yet, read over the [[Electric Force]] page and come back.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the Electric Force is defined as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{F}( \mathbf{r} ) = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_{o}}\frac{|q_{1} q_{2}|}{r^{2}} \hat{\mathbf{r}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\epsilon_{o}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the permittivity of free space with a value of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;8.854 \times 10^{-12} \frac{\text{C}^2}{\text{N} \cdot \text{m}^2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are point charges one and two, respectively&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the distance between the two point charges, which can also be written as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;|\mathbf{r}|&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, the magnitude of the vector connecting the two charges&#039; positions&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat{\mathbf{r}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the unit vector pointing from charge one to charge two, or from charge two to charge one, depending on whether the force on charge two or charge one is wanted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; of a source charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q_{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{E}_{s} ( \mathbf{r}) &amp;amp; = \frac{\mathbf{F}_{s} ( \mathbf{r} )}{|q|} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp; = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_{o}}\frac{|Q_{s}|}{r^{2}}\hat{\mathbf{r}}&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Radially, the magnitude of a point charge&#039;s &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; looks something like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MagnitudeofEField.jpg|center|700px|thumb|&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;2 \times 10^{-15} \ \text{C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; charge&#039;s electric field magnitude as a function of radius.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A point charge&#039;s &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; is also related to its Electric Potential. If you are unfamiliar with the idea of electric potential, then review these pages ([[Electric Field and Electric Potential]] and [[Electric Potential]]) and come back.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A charge&#039;s &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; and Electric Potential &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are related by:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = -\int_{\mathbf{b}}^{\mathbf{a}} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the potential difference between points &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{a}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{b}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is an infinitesimal length along the path between &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{a}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{b}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This relation is less useful for us unless we use a straight line approximation, such that:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
V_{ab} &amp;amp; = -\mathbf{E} \cdot \Delta \mathbf{L} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp; = - \bigl( E_{x}, E_{y}, E_{z} \bigl) \cdot \bigl( \Delta L_{x}, \Delta L_{y}, \Delta L_{z} \bigl) \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp; = - \bigl( E_{x}\Delta L_{x} + E_{y}\Delta L_{y} + E_{z}\Delta L_{z} \bigl) \\&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This leads to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} (x,y,z) = - \biggl( \frac{\Delta V_{x}}{\Delta L_{x}}, \frac{\Delta V_{y}}{\Delta L_{y}}, \frac{\Delta V_{z}}{\Delta L_{z}} \biggl)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By convention, the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; due to a positive point charge always points away from itself, and the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; of a negative point charge always points towards itself as shown below:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Posandnegefield.png|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Opposite charges will attract each other, and like charges will repel each other, as shown below:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Multiplechargeefield.png|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lastly, the Principle of Superposition is directly applicable to finding the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; due to multiple point source charges, using the a vector sum:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{E}_{sum} (\mathbf{r}) &amp;amp; = \mathbf{E}_{1} + \mathbf{E}_{2} + \mathbf{E}_{3} + \cdots + \mathbf{E}_{N} \\ &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp; = \sum_{1}^{N} \mathbf{E}_{n} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp; = \sum_{1}^{N} \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{o}} \frac{|Q_{s_{n}}|}{r_{n}^{2}} \hat{\mathbf{r}}_n&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::*When using this, be careful to take note that the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; of a negative charge points in the opposite direction as a positive charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Critical Formulas:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} ( \mathbf{r}) = \frac{\mathbf{F} ( \mathbf{r} )}{|q|}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
**&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} ( \mathbf{r}) = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_{o}}\frac{|Q|}{r^{2}}\hat{\mathbf{r}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
**&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} (x,y,z) = - \biggl( \frac{\Delta V_{x}}{\Delta L_{x}}, \frac{\Delta V_{y}}{\Delta L_{y}}, \frac{\Delta V_{z}}{\Delta L_{z}} \biggl)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
**&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{sum} (\mathbf{r}) = \sum_{1}^{N} \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{o}} \frac{|Q_{s_{n}}|}{r_{n}^{2}} \hat{\mathbf{r}}_n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:NormalEField.png|right|250px|thumb|Normal view of simulated electric field]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    ###--Create Electric Field Lines of a Positive Charge at the Origin--###&lt;br /&gt;
    #==============================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Import statements for VPython---#&lt;br /&gt;
    from __future__ import division&lt;br /&gt;
    from visual import *&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Import function used to find combinations---#&lt;br /&gt;
    from itertools import combinations&lt;br /&gt;
    #==============================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Create scene---#&lt;br /&gt;
    scene.center = vector(0,0,0)  #-Position of source charge-#&lt;br /&gt;
    scene.height = 800  #-Set height of frame of scene-#&lt;br /&gt;
    scene.width = 800  #-Set width of frame of scene-#&lt;br /&gt;
    scene.range = 4  #-Set range of scene-#&lt;br /&gt;
    scene.userzoom = 1  #-Allow user to zoom in/out: CTRL &amp;amp; move in/out on trackpad-#&lt;br /&gt;
    scene.userspin = 1  #-Allow user to rotate camera angle: SHIFT &amp;amp; OPTION &amp;amp; move around on track pad-#&lt;br /&gt;
    #==============================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Specify point charge attributes---#&lt;br /&gt;
    sourceCharge = 3*10**(-11)  #-Coulombs of charge-#&lt;br /&gt;
    sourcePos = vector(0,0,0) #-Position of source charge-#&lt;br /&gt;
    ###--Modeling source point charge as a sphere with radius 0.1 meters--###&lt;br /&gt;
    sourceObj = sphere(pos = sourcePos, radius = 0.1, color = color.cyan)&lt;br /&gt;
    #==============================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Set range (0 to 3) and possible inputs for the coordinates (0.5 step)---#&lt;br /&gt;
    ###--Many of the same number included to allow for combinations such as (1,1,1).&lt;br /&gt;
        #The itertools.combinations function will only use each element of the...&lt;br /&gt;
        #list once, starting from the beginning.&lt;br /&gt;
        #Repeating each coordinate many times with intermixing, grants...&lt;br /&gt;
    [[File:CenteredAndDistantEField.png|right|250px|thumb|Distant view of simulated electric field]]&lt;br /&gt;
        #all combinations of points, with repeats however.&lt;br /&gt;
        #Later, a for loop will be used to eliminate repeats.&lt;br /&gt;
        #This can be optimized later if need be.---------------###&lt;br /&gt;
    posXYZ = [0, -0.5, 1, -1.5, 2, -2.5, 3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, 0.5, -1, 1.5, -2, 2.5, -3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, -0.5, 1, -1.5, 2, -2.5, 3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, 0.5, -1, 1.5, -2, 2.5, -3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, -0.5, 1, -1.5, 2, -2.5, 3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, 0.5, -1, 1.5, -2, 2.5, -3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, -0.5, 1, -1.5, 2, -2.5, 3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, 0.5, -1, 1.5, -2, 2.5, -3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, -0.5, 1, -1.5, 2, -2.5, 3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, 0.5, -1, 1.5, -2, 2.5, -3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, -0.5, 1, -1.5, 2, -2.5, 3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, 0.5, -1, 1.5, -2, 2.5, -3]&lt;br /&gt;
    #==============================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:RotatedAndZoomedInEField.png|right|250px|thumb|Rotated and zoomed in view of simulated electric field]]&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Create combinations of points (x,y,z) for later use---#&lt;br /&gt;
        ###--prelimPoints will be a list of tuples of tuples--##&lt;br /&gt;
            #ie: [((,,),(,,),(,,),(,,)) , ((,,),(,,)) ,..., ((,,),(,,))]&lt;br /&gt;
    prelimPoints = [tuple(combinations(posXYZ, 3))]&lt;br /&gt;
    ###--Pull the points out of the grouping tuples and add them to a...&lt;br /&gt;
        #new list alphaPoints------------------------###&lt;br /&gt;
    alphaPoints = []&lt;br /&gt;
    for groupingTuple in prelimPoints:&lt;br /&gt;
        for XYZ in groupingTuple:&lt;br /&gt;
            if XYZ not in alphaPoints:  #-Check for repeat (x,y,z)-#&lt;br /&gt;
                alphaPoints.append(XYZ)&lt;br /&gt;
            ##--The negative of this tuple may not be in the combinations:&lt;br /&gt;
                #check to see-------------##&lt;br /&gt;
            first = -XYZ[0]&lt;br /&gt;
            second = -XYZ[1]&lt;br /&gt;
            third = -XYZ[2]&lt;br /&gt;
            negXYZ = (first, second, third)&lt;br /&gt;
            if negXYZ not in alphaPoints:&lt;br /&gt;
                alphaPoints.append(negXYZ)&lt;br /&gt;
            ##--Swap x and z coordinates for futher combination checking--##&lt;br /&gt;
            first = XYZ[2]&lt;br /&gt;
            second = XYZ[1]&lt;br /&gt;
            third = XYZ[0]&lt;br /&gt;
            reverseXYZ = (first, second, third)&lt;br /&gt;
            if reverseXYZ not in alphaPoints:&lt;br /&gt;
                alphaPoints.append(reverseXYZ)&lt;br /&gt;
            ##--The negative of the x and z coordinate swap may not be in...&lt;br /&gt;
                #the combinations: check to see---------##&lt;br /&gt;
            first = -XYZ[2]&lt;br /&gt;
            second = -XYZ[1]&lt;br /&gt;
            third = -XYZ[0]&lt;br /&gt;
            reverseXYZneg = (first, second, third)&lt;br /&gt;
            if reverseXYZneg not in alphaPoints:&lt;br /&gt;
                alphaPoints.append(reverseXYZneg)&lt;br /&gt;
            ##--Make x [3], y [0], and z [1] to check for more combinations--##&lt;br /&gt;
            first = XYZ[1]&lt;br /&gt;
            second = XYZ[2]&lt;br /&gt;
            third = XYZ[0]&lt;br /&gt;
            shiftedXYZ = (first, second, third)&lt;br /&gt;
            if shiftedXYZ not in alphaPoints:&lt;br /&gt;
                alphaPoints.append(shiftedXYZ)&lt;br /&gt;
            ##--The negative of the shifted XYZ may not be in the combinations:&lt;br /&gt;
                #check to see---------------##&lt;br /&gt;
            first = -XYZ[1]&lt;br /&gt;
            second = -XYZ[2]&lt;br /&gt;
            third = -XYZ[0]&lt;br /&gt;
            shiftedXYZneg = (first, second, third)&lt;br /&gt;
            if shiftedXYZneg not in alphaPoints:&lt;br /&gt;
                alphaPoints.append(shiftedXYZneg)&lt;br /&gt;
    ###--------This should be enough recombining---------###&lt;br /&gt;
    #================================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SideAngleAndTopViewEField.png|right|250px|thumb|Rotated top view of simulated electric field]]&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Create a new list of tuples that contain the points, magnitude,...&lt;br /&gt;
        #and direction (betaPoints)-----------#&lt;br /&gt;
            #ie: [((x,y,z), mag((x,y,z)), norm((x,y,z))),...]&lt;br /&gt;
    betaPoints = []&lt;br /&gt;
    for XYZ in alphaPoints:&lt;br /&gt;
        Mag = mag(XYZ)&lt;br /&gt;
        Dir = norm(XYZ)&lt;br /&gt;
        betaPoints.append((XYZ, Mag, Dir))&lt;br /&gt;
    #================================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Sort the tuples based on their magnitudes from least to greatest...&lt;br /&gt;
       #using sorted().&lt;br /&gt;
            #key = lamda x: x[1] tells the sorted function to sort the tuples...&lt;br /&gt;
                #based on their second component...their magnitudes--------#&lt;br /&gt;
    charliePoints = sorted(betaPoints, key = lambda x: x[1])&lt;br /&gt;
    #================================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Calculate parts of electric field equation:&lt;br /&gt;
        #E = 1/(4*pi*epsilon0) * Q/(magnitude)**2&lt;br /&gt;
    epsilonO = 8.854*(10**(-12)) #-N*(m/C)**2-#&lt;br /&gt;
    k = 1/(4*pi*(epsilonO)) #-N*(m/C)**2-#&lt;br /&gt;
    chargeContri = k*sourceCharge #-N*(m**2/C)-#&lt;br /&gt;
    #================================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Loop through points and find mag of electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
        #add it to a new list with the existing tuple info-------#&lt;br /&gt;
    deltaPoints = []&lt;br /&gt;
    for XYZ in charliePoints:&lt;br /&gt;
        try:  ###-Avoid divide by 0 error in (x,y,z) = (0,0,0)-###&lt;br /&gt;
            magEfield = chargeContri*(1/(XYZ[1])**2)&lt;br /&gt;
        except:&lt;br /&gt;
            magEfield = 0&lt;br /&gt;
        tupEfield = (XYZ[0], XYZ[1], XYZ[2], magEfield)&lt;br /&gt;
        deltaPoints.append(tupEfield)&lt;br /&gt;
    #================================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SIdeAngleAndSideViewEField.png|right|250px|thumb|Side angle of simulated electric field]]&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Loop through points and create an arrow at that point proportional in...&lt;br /&gt;
        #length to the magnitude of the electric field there.&lt;br /&gt;
        #Also, the arrow points in the direction of the electric field there.&lt;br /&gt;
        #Color coding is based on 0.25 meter increments:&lt;br /&gt;
            #stronger field = redder; weaker field = blue&lt;br /&gt;
    for XYZ in deltaPoints:&lt;br /&gt;
        if XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 0.25:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*0.5&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.000, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*0.2,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*0.25)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 0.5:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*0.7&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.200, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*0.2,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*0.25)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 1:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*0.9&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.300, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*0.2,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*0.25)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 1.25:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*1.1&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.400, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*0.2,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*0.25)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 1.5:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*1.3&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.500, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*1,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*1)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 1.75:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*1.5&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.600, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*1,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*1)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 2:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*1.7&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.700, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*1,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*1)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 2.25:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*1.9&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.800, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*1,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*1)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 2.5:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*2.1&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.900, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*1,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*1)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 2.75:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*2.3&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 1.000, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*1,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*1)&lt;br /&gt;
        else:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*2.5&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = color.blue,&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*1,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Also, at this link [https://phet.colorado.edu/en/simulation/charges-and-fields Charges and Fields] is a PhET simulation of &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Fields&#039;&#039;&#039;. Play with it if you like.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Question&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
::In the following figure, the red circles represent positive point charges, and the blue circles represent negative point charges. If the yellow arrows are meant to represent the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; due to each point charge, &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;which field(s) and charge(s) are correctly matched?&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039; (Only take into account direction)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricFieldSimpleExample.png|600px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Solution&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
::Since &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; lines always point away from a positive point charge, Option (C.) cannot be correct. Likewise, &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; lines always point towards a negative charge. Therefore, Option (A.) is also incorrect.&lt;br /&gt;
::Option (B.) shows a positive charge with an &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; pointing radially outwards. This is correct. Option (D.) shows a negative charge with an &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; pointing radially inwards. This is also correct.&lt;br /&gt;
:::&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer:&#039;&#039;&#039; Options (B.) &amp;amp; (D.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Question&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:: Four point charges &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\big(q_{1}, q_{2}, q_{3}, \text{and} \ q_{4} \big)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, are each located at a distance &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; along either the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; or &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; axes, as shown in the figure below. &lt;br /&gt;
:*&#039;&#039;&#039;A.)&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;What is the net Electric Field at the origin?&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:*&#039;&#039;&#039;B.)&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;If &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\ |q_{3}| = |q_{1}| \ \text{and} \ |q_{4}| = |q_{2}|&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; what does the Electric Field at the origin reduce to?&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricFieldMiddlingExample.png|600px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Solution&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:*&#039;&#039;&#039;A.)&#039;&#039;&#039; To find the net &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; at the origin, we must first find the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; due to each charge at the origin. &lt;br /&gt;
::*Starting with &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, its general &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; can be described as:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{1} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{1}|}{r_{1}^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}}_{1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is measured relative to the location of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
::::The origin is a distance &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; away from &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, which is along the y-axis. Since it is a positive charge, its &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; at the origin will point &amp;quot;down&amp;quot; the y-axis (away from the charge):&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{1} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{1}|}{d^2} (-\mathbf{j})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{j}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the unit vector in the y-direction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*For &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; we have:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{2} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{2}|}{r_{2}^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}}_{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is measured relative to the location of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
::::The origin is a distance &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; away from &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, which is along the x-axis. Since it is a positive charge, its &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; at the origin will point to the left (away from the charge):&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{2} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{2}|}{d^2} (-\mathbf{i})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{i}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the unit vector in the x-direction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*For &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; we have:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{3} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{3}|}{r_{3}^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}}_{3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is measured relative to the location of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
::::The origin is a distance &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; away from &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, which is along the y-axis. Since it is a negative charge, its &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; at the origin will point &amp;quot;down&amp;quot; the y-axis (towards the charge):&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{3} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{3}|}{d^2} (-\mathbf{j})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{j}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the same unit vector in the y-direction from earlier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*For &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{4}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the electric field is:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{4} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{4}|}{r_{4}^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}}_{4}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{4}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is measured relative to the location of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{4}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
::::The origin is a distance &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; away from &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{4}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, which is along the x-axis. Since it is a positive charge, its &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; at the origin will point to the right (away from the charge):&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{4} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{4}|}{d^2} (\mathbf{i})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{i}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the same unit vector in the x-direction from earlier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Now that we have the four &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Fields&#039;&#039;&#039; present at the origin, we can use the Principle of Superposition to find the &#039;&#039;&#039;net&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; at the origin:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{E}_{net} &amp;amp;= \mathbf{E}_{1} + \mathbf{E}_{2} + \mathbf{E}_{3} + \mathbf{E}_{4} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{1}|}{d^2} (-\mathbf{j}) + \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{2}|}{d^2} (-\mathbf{i}) + \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{3}|}{d^2} (-\mathbf{j}) + \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{4}|}{d^2} (\mathbf{i}) \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} \Big[ -|q_{1}| \mathbf{j} -|q_{2}| \mathbf{i} -|q_{3}| \mathbf{j} + |q_{4}| \mathbf{i} \Big] \\&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{E}_{net} &amp;amp;= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} \Big[ \big( |q_{4}| - |q_{2}| \big)\mathbf{i} - \big( |q_{1}| + |q_{3}| \big)\mathbf{j} \Big]&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricFieldMiddlingExampleAnswer.png|400px|right|thumb|Part &#039;&#039;&#039;(B)&#039;&#039;&#039; answer]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*&#039;&#039;&#039;B.)&#039;&#039;&#039; We will simply plug in the specified values into our answer from &#039;&#039;&#039;(A)&#039;&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{E}_{net} &amp;amp;= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} \Big[ \big( |q_{4}| - |q_{2}| \big)\mathbf{i} - \big( |q_{1}| + |q_{3}| \big)\mathbf{j} \Big] \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} \Big[ \big( |q_{2}| - |q_{2}| \big)\mathbf{i} - \big( |q_{1}| + |q_{1}| \big)\mathbf{j} \Big] \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} \Big[ 0 \mathbf{i} - 2|q_{1}| \mathbf{j} \Big] \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} \Big[ - 2|q_{1}| \mathbf{j} \Big] \\&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{E}_{net} &amp;amp;= - \frac{1}{2 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} |q_{1}| \mathbf{j} \\&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:::*&#039;&#039;&#039;A.)&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{net} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} \Big[ \big( |q_{4}| - |q_{2}| \big)\mathbf{i} - \big( |q_{1}| + |q_{3}| \big)\mathbf{j} \Big]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::*&#039;&#039;&#039;B.)&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{net} = - \frac{1}{2 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} |q_{1}| \mathbf{j}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Question&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
::A ring of evenly distributed charge of radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is centered on the origin in the xy-plane. The ring has a total charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;Show that the Electric Field due to this ring is 0 at the origin.&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricFieldDifficultExample.png|600px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Solution&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
::The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; due to a point charge is given by:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|Q|}{| \mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;} |^{2}} \frac{\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;}}{| \mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;} |}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::This equation is equivalent to the formula presented in the [[Electric Field#A Mathematical Model | Mathematical Model]]. The reason it looks so different is due to a few assumptions in the mathematical model that we have stopped using:&lt;br /&gt;
:::# The source charge is located at the origin (our ring of charge is around the origin)&lt;br /&gt;
:::# The distance between the source charge and the observing location is simply expressed as a distance &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (like in the [[Electric Field#Middling| Middling Example]]). Now, instead we will represent the distance as the magnitude of the difference in position between the source and observer &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\big( | \mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;} | \big)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
:::# Subsequently, our unit vector in the direction of the field &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\big( \hat{\mathbf{r}} \big)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is not simply expressed as a typical unit vector (like in the middling example). It has now become the vector joining the source and observer divided by the magnitude of this same vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bigg( \frac{\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;}}{| \mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;} |} \bigg) &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Another complication this problem presents is:&lt;br /&gt;
::::Where is the source charge?&lt;br /&gt;
:::To answer this, notice that the ring has an evenly distributed TOTAL charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and a radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Also, notice that the &amp;quot;source&amp;quot; position is constantly changing as you go around the ring. This issue makes it much more convenient to speak of the line charge DENSITY at a point along the ring instead of the TOTAL charge. This will allow us to treat the ring as many, many little source charges. The line charge density is simply the charge on the line divided by the length of that line (circumference), since the charge is evenly distributed about the ring:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\rho_{L} = \frac{Q}{2 \pi a}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This allows us to represent a differential amount of source charge as a product of the line charge density and a differential length:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;dQ = \rho_{L} dL&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The next question is: What is a differential length around the ring?&lt;br /&gt;
:::The differential length is a differential arc length &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(s = r \theta)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; around the circle dependent on the change in angle:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;dL = a d\theta&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
dQ &amp;amp;= \frac{Q}{2 \pi a} a d\theta \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= \frac{Q}{2 \pi} d\theta \\&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Now we can sum each of these differential source charge&#039;s contribution to the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; at the origin using an integral:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} = \int \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{\frac{Q}{2 \pi} d\theta}{| \mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;} |^{2}} \frac{\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;}}{| \mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;} |}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The only things left to find are the generic source position (a vector that can describe the position of each differential source charge along the ring) and the observer location. The observer location is given to us; the origin:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{r} = 0\mathbf{i} +0\mathbf{j} + 0\mathbf{k}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The source position is easiest to describe as a radius from the origin (polar coordinates):&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{r}^{&#039;} = a \hat{ \mathbf{a}}_{r}&amp;lt;/math,&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat{\mathbf{a}}_{r}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a unit vector in the radial direction&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;} &amp;amp;= \big( 0\mathbf{i} +0\mathbf{j} + 0\mathbf{k} \big) - \big( a\hat{ \mathbf{a}}_{r} \big) \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= -a\hat{ \mathbf{a}}_{r} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;}| &amp;amp;= \sqrt{(-a)^{2}} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= a \\&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Plugging these into the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; integral gives:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{E} &amp;amp;= \int \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{\frac{Q}{2 \pi} d\theta}{a^2} \frac{-a \hat{ \mathbf{a}}_{r}}{a} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= - \int \frac{1}{8 {\pi}^{2} \epsilon_{0}} \frac{Q}{a^2} \hat{ \mathbf{a}}_{r} d\theta \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= - \frac{Q}{a^{2} 8 {\pi}^{2} \epsilon_{0}} \int \hat{ \mathbf{a}}_{r} d\theta \\&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\theta&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the angle from the x-axis. &lt;br /&gt;
::*To integrate over the entire ring, we set the bounds of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\theta&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;[0, 2 \pi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
::*Also, as of right now, the integral would not evaluate to 0. This is because &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat{ \mathbf{a}}_{r}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; has a hidden dependence on &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\theta&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat{ \mathbf{a}}_{r} = \text{cos}( \theta) \mathbf{i} + \text{sin}( \theta) \mathbf{j}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Plugging this information in gives:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{alignat}{3}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{E} &amp;amp;= - \frac{Q}{a^{2} 8 {\pi}^{2} \epsilon_{0}} \int_{0}^{2 \pi} \big( \text{cos}( \theta) \mathbf{i} + \text{sin}( \theta) \mathbf{j} \big) d\theta \\&lt;br /&gt;
\int_{0}^{2 \pi} \text{cos}( \theta) \mathbf{i} \ d\theta &amp;amp;= 0 \\&lt;br /&gt;
\int_{0}^{2 \pi} \text{sin}( \theta) \mathbf{j} \ d\theta &amp;amp;= 0 \\&lt;br /&gt;
\end{alignat}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} = 0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at the origin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
The real world applications of electric fields are endless. Here are some:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:electricmotor.jpg|400px|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Motors:&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Electric motors convert Electrical Energy into Mechanical Energy through &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Fields&#039;&#039;&#039;. Whenever electric motors are turned on, &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Fields&#039;&#039;&#039; are generated. This is because in order to turn an electric motor, an &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; must first be generated, which then generates a Magnetic Field, thus making the motor spin. Electric motors are used in cars, elevators, fans, refrigerators, and many more applications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Computers:&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Computers use circuits, electric fans, and transistors to work. All of these use &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Fields&#039;&#039;&#039; to push charge through a circuit, spin fans, and allow logic to be implemented in electronics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Painting:&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Fields&#039;&#039;&#039; are also used in some paintings. The &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; generates charges on the surface of the material being painted on, and an opposite charge is generated on the paint. Paint that touches the material sticks, and excess paint falls off to go back into the system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Cancer Treatment:&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Recently, weak &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Fields&#039;&#039;&#039; have been used to kill cancer cells. This treatment works best for brain and breast cancers, and it has no effect on normal cells. In lab and animal tests, this treatment killed cancer cells of every type tested; however, this is still a developing treatment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Fields&#039;&#039;&#039; are created by Electric charges. The original discovery of the Electric charge is not explicitly known, but in 1675 the esteemed chemist Robert Boyle, known for Boyle&#039;s Law, discovered the attraction and repulsion of certain particles in a vacuum. Almost 100 years later in the 18th century, the American Benjamin Franklin first coined the phrases &#039;positive&#039; and &#039;negative&#039; (later developed into proton and electron) for these particles with attractive and repulsive properties. Finally, in the 19th century Michael Faraday utilized his Electrolysis process to discover the discrete nature of Electric charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
The ability to understand &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Fields&#039;&#039;&#039; helps set the basis for the introduction to [[Electric Force]] (as we discussed &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \mathbf{F}  = q\mathbf{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; ). The introduction of Electric Force will attach the specific charge of the particles with the &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Field&#039;&#039;&#039; that they produce, resulting in the Electric Force. Electric Force will lay the ground work for understanding the force that particles have in different systems and environments, and eventually lead to the introduction of [[Magnetic Force]].&lt;br /&gt;
The understanding of &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Fields&#039;&#039;&#039; is a doorway into many various fields, only some of which will be covered in Physics 2212. The fundamental understanding of &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Fields&#039;&#039;&#039; will prove to be very important further along when Magnetic Fields are introduced, as they share many qualities. The understanding of Electric and Magnetic Fields will be used throughout the semester to learn about various Electromagnetic concepts, and ultimately to understanding and apply Maxwell&#039;s Equations. &lt;br /&gt;
Please see related topics:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Electric Potential]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Electric Force]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Lorentz Force]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Electric Polarization]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Charged Ring]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EPIhhbwbCNc&amp;amp;list=PLX2gX-ftPVXUcMGbk1A7UbNtgadPsK5BD&amp;amp;index=9 A Youtube Playlist That Does A Great Job Going Step By Step And Reviewing Topics]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/estatics/Lesson-4/Electric-Field-Lines Further Review On Electric Field Lines.] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://phet.colorado.edu/en/simulation/charges-and-fields Get A Better Understanding Of Fields Through Hands On Manipulation In PhET. This Can Be Very Helpful For Getting An Intuitive Understanding Of Fields.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_field Wikipedia Electric Field]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://openstax.org/details/books/university-physics-volume-2 OpenStax Volume on Electricity and Magnetism]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Hayt &amp;amp; Buck 9th Edition Engineering Electromagnetics&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Matter and Interactions&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurence12799</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=38487</id>
		<title>Electric Potential</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Potential&amp;diff=38487"/>
		<updated>2020-02-09T20:51:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurence12799: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== The Main Idea ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electric potential energy, like all forms of potential energy, is the potential for work to be done, in this case by the electric force. The electric potential (frequently referred to as voltage, from its SI unit the Volt) is the electric potential energy associated with the test charge, such that it depends only on the source, just as the electric field is related to the electric force, but depends only on the source. One may similarly remember the parallel concept of the gravitational potential, which was gravitational potential energy divided by mass.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
====Electric Potential Energy====&lt;br /&gt;
Electric potential energy may be calculated in a variety of manners, depending upon the situation. The electric potential energy between two point charges may be written in a form which follows directly from the definition of the Coulomb force:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = \frac{qQ}{4\pi\epsilon_0 r_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is the amount of energy which would be required to bring one of the charged objects (by convention the small &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; q &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; charge) from an infinite distance to its current position, where, by convention, the potential energy at infinity is equal to zero. This may, therefore, be derived from the equation for work:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Derivation with Calculus=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -W = -\int_\infty^{r_0} \vec{F}_E(r) \cdot \text{d} \vec{r} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -\int_\infty^{r_0} \frac{qQ \hat{r}}{4\pi\epsilon_0 r^2} \cdot \text{d} \vec{r} = -\frac{qQ}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\int_\infty^{r_0} \frac{\hat{r} \cdot \hat{r}}{r^2} \text{d} r &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = \frac{qQ}{4\pi \epsilon_0} \biggr{(} \frac{1}{r} \biggr{|}_{\infty}^{r_0} = \frac{qQ}{4\pi \epsilon_0 r_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Given our definition of the [[Electric Field]], we have that &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vec{F}_E(r) = q\vec{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
so the electric potential energy may be generally written as &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -q\int_a^b \vec{E} \cdot \text{d} \vec{r} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Linear assumption=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the above equation, one can see that if the electric field is constant over the length of the path, then electric potential energy may be written in a simplified manner as&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = q\vec{E}\cdot\Delta \vec{s} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Electric Potential====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just as we divided by charge to go from electric force to electric field, dividing by charge takes us from the electric potential energy to the electric potential. For a test particle of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; q &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we define &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; V = \frac{U}{q} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Derivation with Calculus=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is not especially meaningful without choosing a reference point, just as for potential energy. Thus, one may speak of the potential difference between two points, which is independent of the reference value. From the above definition of electric potential energy, it is possible to derive an expression for the potential difference between two points from the electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\int_a^b \vec{E} \cdot \text{d} \vec{s} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The vectors are used to express the path associated with this integral. The difference in electric potential will be the same no matter what path one takes, as explored in [[Path Independence of Electric Potential]]. This also allows one to write the inverse relationship, determining the electric field at a given point from the electric potential in one and three dimensions respectively:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; E = -\frac{\text{d}V}{\text{d}x}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vec{E} = -\nabla V &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \nabla &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the gradient operator.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Linear Assumption=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The above equations allow us to write the equivalent expressions under an assumption of constant values for the electric field, such that the integral reduces to &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\vec{E} \cdot \Delta \vec{l} = -(E_x \Delta x + E_y \Delta y + E_z \Delta z)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This also leads directly to the inverse expression:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vec{E} = -(\frac{\Delta V_x}{\Delta x} + \frac{\Delta V_y}{\Delta y} + \frac{\Delta V_z}{\Delta z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric potential difference in a field which is nonuniform, but whose variations are discrete, is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\sum \vec{E}\cdot \Delta\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The different parts in this particular equation resembles the equation for the potential difference in an uniform field, except that with the nonuniform field, the potential difference in the different fields are summed up. This situation can be quite easy, but when the system gets difficult, first, choose a path and divide it into smaller pieces of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;; second, write an expression for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -\vec{E}\cdot\Delta\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of one piece; third, add up the contributions of all the pieces; last, check the result to make sure the magnitude, direction, and units make sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is important to keep track of the sign differences. If the path follows the direction of the electric field, the sign of the potential difference will be negative. This may be imagined as dropping a positive test charge in an electric field: a positive charge will be accelerated in the direction of the field, meaning that it is gaining energy, and so its potential must be decreasing. By contrast, if the path is opposite the direction of the field, potential will be increasing, much like rolling a boulder up a hill. If the path is perpendicular to the direction of the electric field, the dot product will be equal to zero. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, when working with different situations, it is nice to keep in mind that in a conductor, the electric field is zero. Therefore, the potential difference is zero as well. In an insulator, the electric field is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{E_{applied}}{K}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the dielectric constant. Furthermore, the potential difference over a round trip is equal to zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
Click on the link to see Electric Potential through VPython!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Make sure to press &amp;quot;Run&amp;quot; to see the principle in action!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://trinket.io/embed/glowscript/0a7e486c94 Teach hand-on with GlowScript]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Watch this video for a more visual approach! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Rb9guSEeVE Electric Potential: Visualizing Voltage with 3D animations]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--== Models ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric potential of a particle at a point is equal to the potential difference of that particle with respect to infinity. Since we know how to calculate the potential difference using the formula, we can see that this implies that the electric potential at infinity is equal to zero. What does this mean? This means that a particle that is extremely far away has no potential energy. This makes sense, because a proton will not be affected by the electric field of another proton at a distance of infinity apart. This subtle detail aids in solving a case of problems types later on.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although electric potential is an important topic to learn, most problems encountered will not ask to find just the &amp;quot;electric potential,&amp;quot; instead, questions will most likely ask for the &amp;quot;electric potential difference.&amp;quot; This is because electric potential is measured using different locations, or more specifically pathways between the different locations, so instead of determining the electric potential of location A and the electric potential of final location B, it would make more sense to determine the &amp;quot;difference in electric potential between locations A and B.&amp;quot; The following mathematical model will further explain this. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like mentioned before, instead of electric potential, in most cases, electric potential difference is needed to be found. The general equation for the potential difference is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{{U}_{electric}} = {q} * ∆{V} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{{U}_{electric}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric potential energy, which is measured in Joules (J). &#039;&#039;&#039;q&#039;&#039;&#039; is the charge of the particle moving through the path of the electric potential difference, which is measured in coulombs (C). &#039;&#039;&#039;∆V&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric potential difference, which is measured in Joules per Coulomb (J/C), or just Volts (V).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Aside from the general equation, the electric potential difference can also be found in other ways. The potential difference in an &#039;&#039;&#039;uniform field&#039;&#039;&#039; is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{V} = -({E}_{x}∆{x} + {E}_{y}∆{y} + {E}_{z}∆{z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;, which can also be written as &#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;∆{V} = -\vec{E}·∆\vec{l}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the electric potential difference, which is measured in Joules per Coulomb (J/C), or just Volts (V). &#039;&#039;&#039;E&#039;&#039;&#039; is the electric field, which is measured in Newtons per Coulomb (N/C), and it is important to note that the different direction components of the electric field are used in the equation. &#039;&#039;&#039;l&#039;&#039;&#039; (or the &#039;&#039;&#039;x&#039;&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;&#039;y&#039;&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;&#039;z&#039;&#039;&#039;) is the distance between the two described locations, which is measured in meters, and x, y, and z, are the different components of the difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, when working with different situations, it is nice to keep in mind that in a conductor, the electric field is zero. Therefore, the potential difference is zero as well. In an insulator, the electric field is &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;{E}_{applied} / K&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; where &#039;&#039;&#039;K&#039;&#039;&#039; is the dielectric constant. Also, the round trip potential difference is always zero, or in other words, if you start from a certain point and end at the same point, then, the potential difference will be zero. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
In a capacitor, the negative charges are located on the left plate, and the positive charges are located on the right plate. Location A is at the left end of the capacitor, and Location B is at the right end of the capacitor, or in other words, Location A and B are only different in terms of their x component location. The path moves from A to B. What is the direction of the electric field? Is the potential difference positive or negative? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ep125.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer: The electric field is to the left. The potential difference is increasing, or is positive.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
The electric field always moves away from the positive charge and towards the negative charge, which means the electric field in this example is to the left. Because the direction and the electric field and the direction of the path are opposite, the potential difference is increasing, or is positive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Calculate the change in electric potential between point A, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(-4, 3,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and B, which is at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(2,-2,0) \; m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; . The electric field in the location is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; (50,0,0) \; N/C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:EP mid fig.png ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer: -300V&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta\vec{l}= (2,-2,0)\;m - (-4,3,0)\;m = (6,-5,0)\;m &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -({E}_{x}∆{x} + {E}_{y}∆{y} + {E}_{z}∆{z})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -(50\; N/C \cdot 6 \;m + 0 \; N/c \cdot -5 \; m + 0\cdot 0)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{V} = -300 V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Bohr Model]] of the hydrogen atom treats it as a nucleus of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; +e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; electrons of charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; orbiting in circular orbits of specific radii. Calculate the potential difference between two points, one infinitely far away from the nucleus, and the other one Bohr radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; away from the nucleus (don&#039;t worry about substituting in the values). Compute the electric potential energy associated with the electron one Bohr radius away from the nucleus, setting the potential energy at infinity as zero (remember the sign of the charge). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:1200px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We may compute the electric potential by taking integrating the electric field of a point charge as the radius goes from infinity to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. This integral may be set up as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\int_\infty^{a_0} \vec{E}\cdot\text{d}\vec{l} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = -\frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \int_\infty^{a_0} \frac{\text{d} r}{r^2} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This may then be solved:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Delta V = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\biggr{(}\frac{1}{r}\biggr{|}_\infty^{a_0} = \frac{e}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
to compute the potential energy, we now multiply by the charge of the electron: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, giving &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U = -\frac{e^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Depending on what physics or chemistry courses you may have taken before, this may be recognizable as twice the ionization energy of the n=1 orbital. The factor of two is due to the fact that in the Bohr model, the kinetic energy will be exactly half of this potential energy, and will be positive so that the net result is still negative, but with half the magnitude. This understanding of the hydrogen atom gets certain values right, but the reality of the situation is far more complicated. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is this topic connected to something that you are interested in?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am interested in robotic systems and building circuit boards and electrical systems for manufacturing robots. While studying this section in the book, I was able to connect back many of the concepts and calculations back to robotics and the electrical component of automated systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Since high school, I never really understood how to work with the voltmeter and what it measured, and I have always wanted to know, but although this particular wiki page did not go into the details and other branches of electric potential, it led me to find the answers to something I was interested in since high school, the concept of electric potential.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I think electively is really interesting. When I was younger, I participated in this demo where a group of people hold hands and someone touches this special ball full of charge. We all could feel the tingling sensation of the current passing through us. It’s cool to learn the theory behind the supposed magic that occurs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I think it&#039;s very interesting that electric potential can be seen as a property of a space and that we can have further applications using this property.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How is it connected to your major?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] I am a Mechanical Engineering major, so I will be dealing with the electrical components of machines when I work. Therefore, I have to know these certain concepts such as electric potential in order to fully understand how they work and interact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revistionist] As a biochemistry major, electric potential and electric potential difference is not particularly related to my major, but in chemistry classes, we use electrostatic potential maps (electrostatic potential energy maps) that shows the charge distributions throughout a molecule. Although the main use in electric potential is different in physics and biochemistry (where physicists use it identify the effect of the electric field at a location), I still found it interesting as the concept of electric potential (buildup) was being used in quite a different way. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] I am a computer science major. Although I deal mostly with software, the hardware aspect is still important. The algorithms that I design run differently on different machines. The time complexity of an algorithm is sometimes useless when worrying about constant factors that are determined by a system’s hardware. Quicksort, for instance, is usually faster than many other sorts that have lower time complexities. The hardware of computers heavily relies on electricity and current (which is induced by a potential difference) to switch transistors on and off and thereby process information. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[FALL 2018] I am an aerospace engineering major, and I think understanding such concepts will help me have a better holistic understanding towards fields and systems. In addition, the thinking behind solving related problems will help me better prepared for future classes that involve with solving dynamics problems. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Is there an interesting industrial application?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Author] Electrical potential is used to find the voltage across a path. This is useful when working with circuit components and attempting to manipulate the power output or current throughout a component.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Revisionist] Electric potential sensors are being used to detect a variety of electrical signals made by the human body, thus contributing to the field of electrophysiology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Editor] The study of electric potential has lead scientists to generate very safe wires that will not overheat and cause fires. Connecting circuits to ground is important and the third prong in an electrical outlet is this ground connection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The idea of electric potential, in a way, started with Ben Franklin and his experiments in the 1740s. He began to understand the flow of electricity, which eventually paved the path towards explaining electric potential and potential difference. Scientists finally began to understand how electric fields were actually affecting the charges and the surrounding environment. Benjamin Franklin first shocked himself in 1746, while conducting experiments on electricity with found objects from around his house. Six years later, or 261 years ago for us, the founding father flew a kite attached to a key and a silk ribbon in a thunderstorm and effectively trapped lightning in a jar. The experiment is now seen as a watershed moment in mankind&#039;s venture to channel a force of nature that was viewed quite abstractly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the time Franklin started experimenting with electricity, he&#039;d already found fame and fortune as the author of Poor Richard&#039;s Almanack. Electricity wasn&#039;t a very well understood phenomenon at that point, so Franklin&#039;s research proved to be fairly foundational. The early experiments, experts believe, were inspired by other scientists&#039; work and the shortcomings therein.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ep135.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
source: http://www.benjamin-franklin-history.org/kite-experiment/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That early brush with the dangers of electricity left an impression on Franklin. He described the sensation as &amp;quot;a universal blow throughout my whole body from head to foot, which seemed within as well as without; after which the first thing I took notice of was a violent quick shaking of my body.&amp;quot; However, it didn&#039;t scare him away. In the handful of years before his famous kite experiment, Franklin contributed everything from designing the first battery designs to establishing some common nomenclature in the study of electricity. Although Franklin is often coined the father of electricity, after he set the foundations of electricity, many other scientists contributed his or her research in the advancement of electricity and eventually led to the discovery of electric potential and potential difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like mentioned multiple times throughout the page, although electric potential is a huge and important topic, it has many branches, which makes the concept of electric potential difficult to stand alone. Even with this page, to support the concept of electric potential, many crucial branches of the topic appeared, like potential difference (which also branched into [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_Path_Independence,_claimed_by_Aditya_Mohile Potential Difference Path Independence]], [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_in_a_Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Uniform Field]], and [[http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Potential_Difference_of_Point_Charge_in_a_Non-Uniform_Field Potential Difference In A Nonuniform Field]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External Links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] https://www.khanacademy.org/test-prep/mcat/physical-processes/electrostatics-1/v/electric-potential-at-a-point-in-space&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pcWz4tP_zUw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vpa_uApmNoo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] https://www.khanacademy.org/science/electrical-engineering/ee-electrostatics/ee-fields-potential-voltage/a/ee-electric-potential-voltage&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] &amp;quot;Benjamin Franklin and Electricity.&amp;quot; Benjamin Franklin and Electricity. N.p., n.d. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.americaslibrary.gov/aa/franklinb/aa_franklinb_electric_1.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Bottyan, Thomas. &amp;quot;Electrostatic Potential Maps.&amp;quot; Chemwiki. N.p., 02 Oct. 2013. Web. 17 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://chemwiki.ucdavis.edu/Core/Theoretical_Chemistry/Chemical_Bonding/General_Principles_of_Chemical_Bonding/Electrostatic_Potential_maps&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] &amp;quot;Electric Potential Difference.&amp;quot; Electric Potential Difference. The Physics Classroom, n.d. Web. 14 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/circuits/Lesson-1/Electric-Potential-Difference&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] Harland, C. J., T. D. Clark, and R. J. Prance. &amp;quot;Applications of Electric Potential (Displacement Current) Sensors in Human Body Electrophysiology.&amp;quot; International Society for Industrial Process Tomography, n.d. Web. 16 Apr. 2016. &amp;lt;http://www.isipt.org/world-congress/3/269.html&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] Sherwood, Bruce A. &amp;quot;2.1 The Momentum Principle.&amp;quot; Matter &amp;amp; Interactions. By Ruth W. Chabay. 4th ed. Vol. 1. N.p.: John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons, 2015. 45-50. Print. Modern Mechanics.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurence12799</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Field&amp;diff=38486</id>
		<title>Electric Field</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Field&amp;diff=38486"/>
		<updated>2020-02-09T16:14:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurence12799: /* References */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
In this page, the concept of an electric field produced by an electric point charge will be described qualitatively and quantitatively through models, examples, and a simulation. An electric field is a useful concept to describe how any charged particle would affect charge around it through the Coulomb force. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric field of a point charge is spherically symmetric, meaning it is the same at all points of equal radius from the source. Hence, it is useful to speak of the electric field at a certain radius (not at a certain &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y,z)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; position), which will be done in [[electric Field#A Mathematical Model| the mathematical model]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Keep in mind, the electric field is a vector quantity. meaning it has a magnitude and direction. The SI units are N/C.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
The electric field vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bigl( \mathbf{E}_{s} \bigl)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of a point source charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bigl( Q_{s} \bigl)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; gives the magnitude and direction of the electrostatic force vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bigl( \mathbf{F}_{s} \bigl)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; exerted on a unit charge (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; Coulomb) by &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q_{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as a function of position &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bigl( \mathbf{r} = (x,y,z) \bigl)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. More generally however, the electrostatic force vector exerted on any point charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bigl( q \bigl)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; by a point source charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bigl( Q_{s} \bigl)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is related to the source charge&#039;s electric field vector by:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{F}_{s} ( \mathbf{r} ) = |q| \mathbf{E}_{s} ( \mathbf{r} )&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This definition requires an understanding of the electrostatic force (Coulomb&#039;s Law), and its mathematical description. If you are not familiar with this yet, read over the [[Electric Force]] page and come back.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the electric force is defined as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{F}( \mathbf{r} ) = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_{o}}\frac{|q_{1} q_{2}|}{r^{2}} \hat{\mathbf{r}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\epsilon_{o}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the permittivity of free space with a value of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;8.854 \times 10^{-12} \frac{\text{C}^2}{\text{N} \cdot \text{m}^2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are point charges one and two, respectively&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the distance between the two point charges, which can also be written as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;|\mathbf{r}|&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, the magnitude of the vector connecting the two charges&#039; positions&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat{\mathbf{r}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the unit vector pointing from charge one to charge two, or from charge two to charge one, depending on whether the force on charge two or charge one is wanted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric field of a source charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q_{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{E}_{s} ( \mathbf{r}) &amp;amp; = \frac{\mathbf{F}_{s} ( \mathbf{r} )}{|q|} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp; = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_{o}}\frac{|Q_{s}|}{r^{2}}\hat{\mathbf{r}}&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Radially, the magnitude of a charge&#039;s electric field looks something like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MagnitudeofEField.jpg|center|700px|thumb|&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;2 \times 10^{-15} \ \text{C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; charge&#039;s electric field magnitude as a function of radius.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A point charge&#039;s electric field is also related to its electric potential. If you are unfamiliar with the idea of electric potential, then review these pages ([[Electric Field and Electric Potential]] and [[Electric Potential]]) and come back.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A charge&#039;s electric field and electric potential &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are related by:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = -\int_{\mathbf{b}}^{\mathbf{a}} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the potential difference between points &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{a}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{b}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the electric field&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is an infinitesimal length in the direction of the path between &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{a}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{b}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This relation is less useful for us unless we use a straight line approximation, such that:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
V_{ab} &amp;amp; = -\mathbf{E} \cdot \Delta \mathbf{L} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp; = - \bigl( E_{x}, E_{y}, E_{z} \bigl) \cdot \bigl( \Delta L_{x}, \Delta L_{y}, \Delta L_{z} \bigl) \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp; = - \bigl( E_{x}\Delta L_{x} + E_{y}\Delta L_{y} + E_{z}\Delta L_{z} \bigl) \\&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This leads to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} (x,y,z) = - \biggl( \frac{\Delta V_{x}}{\Delta L_{x}}, \frac{\Delta V_{y}}{\Delta L_{y}}, \frac{\Delta V_{z}}{\Delta L_{z}} \biggl)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By convention, the electric field due to a positive point charge always points away from itself, and the electric field of a negative point charge always points towards itself as shown below:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Posandnegefield.png|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Different charges will attract each other, and like charges will repel each other, as shown below:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Multiplechargeefield.png|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lastly, the principle of superposition is directly applicable to finding the electric field due to multiple point source charges, using the a vector sum:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{E}_{sum} (\mathbf{r}) &amp;amp; = \mathbf{E}_{1} + \mathbf{E}_{2} + \mathbf{E}_{3} + \cdots + \mathbf{E}_{N} \\ &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp; = \sum_{1}^{N} \mathbf{E}_{n} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp; = \sum_{1}^{N} \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{o}} \frac{|Q_{s_{n}}|}{r_{n}^{2}} \hat{\mathbf{r}}_n&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::*When using this, be careful to take note that the electric field of a negative charge points in the opposite direction as a positive charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Critical Formulas:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} ( \mathbf{r}) = \frac{\mathbf{F} ( \mathbf{r} )}{|q|}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
**&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} ( \mathbf{r}) = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_{o}}\frac{|Q|}{r^{2}}\hat{\mathbf{r}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
**&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} (x,y,z) = - \biggl( \frac{\Delta V_{x}}{\Delta L_{x}}, \frac{\Delta V_{y}}{\Delta L_{y}}, \frac{\Delta V_{z}}{\Delta L_{z}} \biggl)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
**&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{sum} (\mathbf{r}) = \sum_{1}^{N} \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{o}} \frac{|Q_{s_{n}}|}{r_{n}^{2}} \hat{\mathbf{r}}_n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:NormalEField.png|right|250px|thumb|Normal view of simulated electric field]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    ###--Create Electric Field Lines of a Positive Charge at the Origin--###&lt;br /&gt;
    #==============================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Import statements for VPython---#&lt;br /&gt;
    from __future__ import division&lt;br /&gt;
    from visual import *&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Import function used to find combinations---#&lt;br /&gt;
    from itertools import combinations&lt;br /&gt;
    #==============================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Create scene---#&lt;br /&gt;
    scene.center = vector(0,0,0)  #-Position of source charge-#&lt;br /&gt;
    scene.height = 800  #-Set height of frame of scene-#&lt;br /&gt;
    scene.width = 800  #-Set width of frame of scene-#&lt;br /&gt;
    scene.range = 4  #-Set range of scene-#&lt;br /&gt;
    scene.userzoom = 1  #-Allow user to zoom in/out: CTRL &amp;amp; move in/out on trackpad-#&lt;br /&gt;
    scene.userspin = 1  #-Allow user to rotate camera angle: SHIFT &amp;amp; OPTION &amp;amp; move around on track pad-#&lt;br /&gt;
    #==============================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Specify point charge attributes---#&lt;br /&gt;
    sourceCharge = 3*10**(-11)  #-Coulombs of charge-#&lt;br /&gt;
    sourcePos = vector(0,0,0) #-Position of source charge-#&lt;br /&gt;
    ###--Modeling source point charge as a sphere with radius 0.1 meters--###&lt;br /&gt;
    sourceObj = sphere(pos = sourcePos, radius = 0.1, color = color.cyan)&lt;br /&gt;
    #==============================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Set range (0 to 3) and possible inputs for the coordinates (0.5 step)---#&lt;br /&gt;
    ###--Many of the same number included to allow for combinations such as (1,1,1).&lt;br /&gt;
        #The itertools.combinations function will only use each element of the...&lt;br /&gt;
        #list once, starting from the beginning.&lt;br /&gt;
        #Repeating each coordinate many times with intermixing, grants...&lt;br /&gt;
    [[File:CenteredAndDistantEField.png|right|250px|thumb|Distant view of simulated electric field]]&lt;br /&gt;
        #all combinations of points, with repeats however.&lt;br /&gt;
        #Later, a for loop will be used to eliminate repeats.&lt;br /&gt;
        #This can be optimized later if need be.---------------###&lt;br /&gt;
    posXYZ = [0, -0.5, 1, -1.5, 2, -2.5, 3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, 0.5, -1, 1.5, -2, 2.5, -3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, -0.5, 1, -1.5, 2, -2.5, 3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, 0.5, -1, 1.5, -2, 2.5, -3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, -0.5, 1, -1.5, 2, -2.5, 3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, 0.5, -1, 1.5, -2, 2.5, -3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, -0.5, 1, -1.5, 2, -2.5, 3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, 0.5, -1, 1.5, -2, 2.5, -3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, -0.5, 1, -1.5, 2, -2.5, 3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, 0.5, -1, 1.5, -2, 2.5, -3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, -0.5, 1, -1.5, 2, -2.5, 3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, 0.5, -1, 1.5, -2, 2.5, -3]&lt;br /&gt;
    #==============================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:RotatedAndZoomedInEField.png|right|250px|thumb|Rotated and zoomed in view of simulated electric field]]&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Create combinations of points (x,y,z) for later use---#&lt;br /&gt;
        ###--prelimPoints will be a list of tuples of tuples--##&lt;br /&gt;
            #ie: [((,,),(,,),(,,),(,,)) , ((,,),(,,)) ,..., ((,,),(,,))]&lt;br /&gt;
    prelimPoints = [tuple(combinations(posXYZ, 3))]&lt;br /&gt;
    ###--Pull the points out of the grouping tuples and add them to a...&lt;br /&gt;
        #new list alphaPoints------------------------###&lt;br /&gt;
    alphaPoints = []&lt;br /&gt;
    for groupingTuple in prelimPoints:&lt;br /&gt;
        for XYZ in groupingTuple:&lt;br /&gt;
            if XYZ not in alphaPoints:  #-Check for repeat (x,y,z)-#&lt;br /&gt;
                alphaPoints.append(XYZ)&lt;br /&gt;
            ##--The negative of this tuple may not be in the combinations:&lt;br /&gt;
                #check to see-------------##&lt;br /&gt;
            first = -XYZ[0]&lt;br /&gt;
            second = -XYZ[1]&lt;br /&gt;
            third = -XYZ[2]&lt;br /&gt;
            negXYZ = (first, second, third)&lt;br /&gt;
            if negXYZ not in alphaPoints:&lt;br /&gt;
                alphaPoints.append(negXYZ)&lt;br /&gt;
            ##--Swap x and z coordinates for futher combination checking--##&lt;br /&gt;
            first = XYZ[2]&lt;br /&gt;
            second = XYZ[1]&lt;br /&gt;
            third = XYZ[0]&lt;br /&gt;
            reverseXYZ = (first, second, third)&lt;br /&gt;
            if reverseXYZ not in alphaPoints:&lt;br /&gt;
                alphaPoints.append(reverseXYZ)&lt;br /&gt;
            ##--The negative of the x and z coordinate swap may not be in...&lt;br /&gt;
                #the combinations: check to see---------##&lt;br /&gt;
            first = -XYZ[2]&lt;br /&gt;
            second = -XYZ[1]&lt;br /&gt;
            third = -XYZ[0]&lt;br /&gt;
            reverseXYZneg = (first, second, third)&lt;br /&gt;
            if reverseXYZneg not in alphaPoints:&lt;br /&gt;
                alphaPoints.append(reverseXYZneg)&lt;br /&gt;
            ##--Make x [3], y [0], and z [1] to check for more combinations--##&lt;br /&gt;
            first = XYZ[1]&lt;br /&gt;
            second = XYZ[2]&lt;br /&gt;
            third = XYZ[0]&lt;br /&gt;
            shiftedXYZ = (first, second, third)&lt;br /&gt;
            if shiftedXYZ not in alphaPoints:&lt;br /&gt;
                alphaPoints.append(shiftedXYZ)&lt;br /&gt;
            ##--The negative of the shifted XYZ may not be in the combinations:&lt;br /&gt;
                #check to see---------------##&lt;br /&gt;
            first = -XYZ[1]&lt;br /&gt;
            second = -XYZ[2]&lt;br /&gt;
            third = -XYZ[0]&lt;br /&gt;
            shiftedXYZneg = (first, second, third)&lt;br /&gt;
            if shiftedXYZneg not in alphaPoints:&lt;br /&gt;
                alphaPoints.append(shiftedXYZneg)&lt;br /&gt;
    ###--------This should be enough recombining---------###&lt;br /&gt;
    #================================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SideAngleAndTopViewEField.png|right|250px|thumb|Rotated top view of simulated electric field]]&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Create a new list of tuples that contain the points, magnitude,...&lt;br /&gt;
        #and direction (betaPoints)-----------#&lt;br /&gt;
            #ie: [((x,y,z), mag((x,y,z)), norm((x,y,z))),...]&lt;br /&gt;
    betaPoints = []&lt;br /&gt;
    for XYZ in alphaPoints:&lt;br /&gt;
        Mag = mag(XYZ)&lt;br /&gt;
        Dir = norm(XYZ)&lt;br /&gt;
        betaPoints.append((XYZ, Mag, Dir))&lt;br /&gt;
    #================================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Sort the tuples based on their magnitudes from least to greatest...&lt;br /&gt;
       #using sorted().&lt;br /&gt;
            #key = lamda x: x[1] tells the sorted function to sort the tuples...&lt;br /&gt;
                #based on their second component...their magnitudes--------#&lt;br /&gt;
    charliePoints = sorted(betaPoints, key = lambda x: x[1])&lt;br /&gt;
    #================================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Calculate parts of electric field equation:&lt;br /&gt;
        #E = 1/(4*pi*epsilon0) * Q/(magnitude)**2&lt;br /&gt;
    epsilonO = 8.854*(10**(-12)) #-N*(m/C)**2-#&lt;br /&gt;
    k = 1/(4*pi*(epsilonO)) #-N*(m/C)**2-#&lt;br /&gt;
    chargeContri = k*sourceCharge #-N*(m**2/C)-#&lt;br /&gt;
    #================================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Loop through points and find mag of electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
        #add it to a new list with the existing tuple info-------#&lt;br /&gt;
    deltaPoints = []&lt;br /&gt;
    for XYZ in charliePoints:&lt;br /&gt;
        try:  ###-Avoid divide by 0 error in (x,y,z) = (0,0,0)-###&lt;br /&gt;
            magEfield = chargeContri*(1/(XYZ[1])**2)&lt;br /&gt;
        except:&lt;br /&gt;
            magEfield = 0&lt;br /&gt;
        tupEfield = (XYZ[0], XYZ[1], XYZ[2], magEfield)&lt;br /&gt;
        deltaPoints.append(tupEfield)&lt;br /&gt;
    #================================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SIdeAngleAndSideViewEField.png|right|250px|thumb|Side angle of simulated electric field]]&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Loop through points and create an arrow at that point proportional in...&lt;br /&gt;
        #length to the magnitude of the electric field there.&lt;br /&gt;
        #Also, the arrow points in the direction of the electric field there.&lt;br /&gt;
        #Color coding is based on 0.25 meter increments:&lt;br /&gt;
            #stronger field = redder; weaker field = blue&lt;br /&gt;
    for XYZ in deltaPoints:&lt;br /&gt;
        if XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 0.25:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*0.5&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.000, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*0.2,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*0.25)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 0.5:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*0.7&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.200, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*0.2,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*0.25)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 1:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*0.9&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.300, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*0.2,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*0.25)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 1.25:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*1.1&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.400, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*0.2,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*0.25)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 1.5:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*1.3&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.500, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*1,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*1)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 1.75:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*1.5&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.600, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*1,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*1)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 2:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*1.7&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.700, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*1,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*1)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 2.25:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*1.9&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.800, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*1,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*1)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 2.5:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*2.1&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.900, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*1,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*1)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 2.75:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*2.3&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 1.000, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*1,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*1)&lt;br /&gt;
        else:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*2.5&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = color.blue,&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*1,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Also, at this link [https://phet.colorado.edu/en/simulation/charges-and-fields Charges and Fields] is a PhET simulation of electric fields. Play with it if you like.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Question&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
::In the following figure, the red circles represent positive point charges, and the blue circles represent negative point charges. If the yellow arrows are meant to represent the point charge&#039;s electric field lines, &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;which field(s) and charge(s) are correctly matched?&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039; (Only take into account direction)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricFieldSimpleExample.png|600px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Solution&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
::Since electric field lines always point away from a positive point charge, Option (C.) cannot be correct. Likewise, electric field lines always point towards a negative charge. Therefore, Option (A.) is also incorrect.&lt;br /&gt;
::Option (B.) shows a positive charge with an electric field pointing radially outwards. This is correct. Option (D.) shows a negative charge with an electric field pointing radially inwards. This is also correct.&lt;br /&gt;
:::&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer:&#039;&#039;&#039; Options (B.) &amp;amp; (D.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Question&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:: Four point charges &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\big(q_{1}, q_{2}, q_{3}, \text{and} \ q_{4} \big)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, are each located at a distance &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; along either the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; or &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; axes, as shown in the figure below. &lt;br /&gt;
:*&#039;&#039;&#039;A.)&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;What is the net electric field at the origin?&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:*&#039;&#039;&#039;B.)&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;If &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\ |q_{3}| = |q_{1}| \ \text{and} \ |q_{4}| = |q_{2}|&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; what does the electric field at the origin reduce to?&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricFieldMiddlingExample.png|600px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Solution&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:*&#039;&#039;&#039;A.)&#039;&#039;&#039; To find the net electric field at the origin, we must first find the electric field due to each charge at the origin. &lt;br /&gt;
::*Starting with &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, its general electric field can be described as:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{1} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{1}|}{r_{1}^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}}_{1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is measured relative to the location of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
::::The origin is a distance &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; away from &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, which is along the y-axis. Since it is a positive charge, its electric field at the origin will point &amp;quot;down&amp;quot; the y-axis (away from the charge):&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{1} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{1}|}{d^2} (-\mathbf{j})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{j}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the unit vector in the y-direction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*For &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; we have:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{2} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{2}|}{r_{2}^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}}_{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is measured relative to the location of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
::::The origin is a distance &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; away from &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, which is along the x-axis. Since it is a positive charge, its electric field at the origin will point to the left (away from the charge):&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{2} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{2}|}{d^2} (-\mathbf{i})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{i}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the unit vector in the x-direction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*For &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; we have:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{3} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{3}|}{r_{3}^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}}_{3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is measured relative to the location of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
::::The origin is a distance &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; away from &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, which is along the y-axis. Since it is a negative charge, its electric field at the origin will point &amp;quot;down&amp;quot; the y-axis (towards the charge):&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{3} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{3}|}{d^2} (-\mathbf{j})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{j}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the same unit vector in the y-direction from earlier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*For &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{4}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the electric field is:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{4} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{4}|}{r_{4}^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}}_{4}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{4}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is measured relative to the location of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{4}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
::::The origin is a distance &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; away from &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{4}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, which is along the x-axis. Since it is a positive charge, its electric field at the origin will point to the right (away from the charge):&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{4} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{4}|}{d^2} (\mathbf{i})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{i}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the same unit vector in the x-direction from earlier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Now that we have the four electric fields present at the origin, we can use the principle of superposition to find the &#039;&#039;&#039;net&#039;&#039;&#039; electric field at the origin:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{E}_{net} &amp;amp;= \mathbf{E}_{1} + \mathbf{E}_{2} + \mathbf{E}_{3} + \mathbf{E}_{4} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{1}|}{d^2} (-\mathbf{j}) + \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{2}|}{d^2} (-\mathbf{i}) + \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{3}|}{d^2} (-\mathbf{j}) + \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{4}|}{d^2} (\mathbf{i}) \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} \Big[ -|q_{1}| \mathbf{j} -|q_{2}| \mathbf{i} -|q_{3}| \mathbf{j} + |q_{4}| \mathbf{i} \Big] \\&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{E}_{net} &amp;amp;= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} \Big[ \big( |q_{4}| - |q_{2}| \big)\mathbf{i} - \big( |q_{1}| + |q_{3}| \big)\mathbf{j} \Big]&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricFieldMiddlingExampleAnswer.png|400px|right|thumb|Part &#039;&#039;&#039;(B)&#039;&#039;&#039; answer]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*&#039;&#039;&#039;B.)&#039;&#039;&#039; We will simply plug in the specified values into our answer from &#039;&#039;&#039;(A)&#039;&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{E}_{net} &amp;amp;= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} \Big[ \big( |q_{4}| - |q_{2}| \big)\mathbf{i} - \big( |q_{1}| + |q_{3}| \big)\mathbf{j} \Big] \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} \Big[ \big( |q_{2}| - |q_{2}| \big)\mathbf{i} - \big( |q_{1}| + |q_{1}| \big)\mathbf{j} \Big] \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} \Big[ 0 \mathbf{i} - 2|q_{1}| \mathbf{j} \Big] \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} \Big[ - 2|q_{1}| \mathbf{j} \Big] \\&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{E}_{net} &amp;amp;= - \frac{1}{2 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} |q_{1}| \mathbf{j} \\&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:::*&#039;&#039;&#039;A.)&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{net} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} \Big[ \big( |q_{4}| - |q_{2}| \big)\mathbf{i} - \big( |q_{1}| + |q_{3}| \big)\mathbf{j} \Big]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::*&#039;&#039;&#039;B.)&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{net} = - \frac{1}{2 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} |q_{1}| \mathbf{j}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Question&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
::A ring of evenly distributed charge of radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is centered on the origin in the xy-plane. The ring has a total charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;Show that the electric field due to this ring is 0 at the origin.&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricFieldDifficultExample.png|600px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Solution&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
::The electric field due to a point charge is given by:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|Q|}{| \mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;} |^{2}} \frac{\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;}}{| \mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;} |}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::This equation is equivalent to the formula presented in the [[Electric Field#A Mathematical Model | Mathematical Model]]. The reason it looks so different is due to a few assumptions in the mathematical model that we have stopped using:&lt;br /&gt;
:::# The source charge is located at the origin (our ring of charge is around the origin)&lt;br /&gt;
:::# The distance between the source charge and the observing location is simply expressed as a distance &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (like in the [[Electric Field#Middling| Middling Example]]). Now, instead we will represent the distance as the magnitude of the difference in position between the source and observer &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\big( | \mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;} | \big)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
:::# Subsequently, our unit vector in the direction of the field &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\big( \hat{\mathbf{r}} \big)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is not simply expressed as a typical unit vector (like in the middling example). It has now become the vector joining the source and observer divided by the magnitude of this same vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bigg( \frac{\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;}}{| \mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;} |} \bigg) &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Another complication this problem presents is:&lt;br /&gt;
::::Where is the source charge?&lt;br /&gt;
:::To answer this, notice that the ring has an evenly distributed TOTAL charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and a radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Also, notice that the &amp;quot;source&amp;quot; position is constantly changing as you go around the ring. This issue makes it much more convenient to speak of the line charge DENSITY at a point along the ring instead of the TOTAL charge. The line charge density is simply the charge on the line divided by the length of that line (circumference), since the charge is evenly distributed about the ring:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\rho_{L} = \frac{Q}{2 \pi a}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This allows us to represent a differential amount of source charge as a product of the line charge density and a differential length:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;dQ = \rho_{L} dL&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The next question is: What is a differential length around the ring?&lt;br /&gt;
:::The differential length is a differential arc length &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(s = r \theta)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; around the circle dependent on the change in angle:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;dL = a d\theta&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
dQ &amp;amp;= \frac{Q}{2 \pi a} a d\theta \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= \frac{Q}{2 \pi} d\theta \\&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Now we can sum each of these differential source charge&#039;s contribution to the electric field at the origin using an integral:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} = \int \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{\frac{Q}{2 \pi} d\theta}{| \mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;} |^{2}} \frac{\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;}}{| \mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;} |}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The only things left to find are the generic source position (a vector that can describe the position of each differential source charge along the ring) and the observer location. The observer location is given to us; the origin:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{r} = 0\mathbf{i} +0\mathbf{j} + 0\mathbf{k}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The source position is easiest to described as a radius from the origin:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{r}^{&#039;} = a \hat{ \mathbf{a}}_{r}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat{\mathbf{a}}_{r}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a unit vector in the radial direction&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;} &amp;amp;= \big( 0\mathbf{i} +0\mathbf{j} + 0\mathbf{k} \big) - \big( a\hat{ \mathbf{a}}_{r} \big) \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= -a\hat{ \mathbf{a}}_{r} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;}| &amp;amp;= \sqrt{(-a)^{2}} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= a \\&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Plugging these into the electric field integral gives:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{E} &amp;amp;= \int \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{\frac{Q}{2 \pi} d\theta}{a^2} \frac{-a \hat{ \mathbf{a}}_{r}}{a} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= - \int \frac{1}{8 {\pi}^{2} \epsilon_{0}} \frac{Q}{a^2} \hat{ \mathbf{a}}_{r} d\theta \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= - \frac{Q}{a^{2} 8 {\pi}^{2} \epsilon_{0}} \int \hat{ \mathbf{a}}_{r} d\theta \\&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\theta&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the angle from the x-axis. &lt;br /&gt;
::*To integrate over the entire ring, we set the bounds of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\theta&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;[0, 2 \pi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
::*Also, as of right now, the integral would not evaluate to 0. This is because &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat{ \mathbf{a}}_{r}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; has a hidden dependence on &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\theta&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat{ \mathbf{a}}_{r} = \text{cos}( \theta) \mathbf{i} + \text{sin}( \theta) \mathbf{j}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Plugging this information in gives:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{alignat}{3}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{E} &amp;amp;= - \frac{Q}{a^{2} 8 {\pi}^{2} \epsilon_{0}} \int_{0}^{2 \pi} \big( \text{cos}( \theta) \mathbf{i} + \text{sin}( \theta) \mathbf{j} \big) d\theta \\&lt;br /&gt;
\int_{0}^{2 \pi} \text{cos}( \theta) \mathbf{i} \ d\theta &amp;amp;= 0 \\&lt;br /&gt;
\int_{0}^{2 \pi} \text{sin}( \theta) \mathbf{j} \ d\theta &amp;amp;= 0 \\&lt;br /&gt;
\end{alignat}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} = 0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at the origin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
The real world applications of electric fields are endless. Here are some:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:electricmotor.jpg|400px|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Motors:&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Electric motors convert electrical energy into mechanical energy through electric fields. Whenever electric motors are turned on, electric fields are generated. This is because in order to turn an electric motor, an electric field must first be generated, which then generates a magnetic field, thus making the motor spin. Electric motors are used in cars, elevators, fans, refrigerators, and many more applications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Computers:&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Computers use circuits, electric fans, and transistors to work. All of these use electric fields to push charge through a circuit, spin the fan, and allow logic to be implemented in electronics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Painting:&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Electric fields are also used in some paintings. The electric field generates charges on the surface of the material being painted on, and an opposite charge is generated on the paint. Paint that touches the material sticks, and excess paint falls off to go back into the system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Cancer Treatment:&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Recently, weak electric fields have been used to kill cancer cells. This treatment works best for brain and breast cancers, and it has no effect on normal cells. In lab and animal tests, this treatment killed cancer cells of every type tested; however, this is still a developing treatment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
Electric fields are created by electric charges. The original discovery of the electric charge is not explicitly known, but in 1675 the esteemed chemist Robert Boyle, known for Boyle&#039;s Law, discovered the attraction and repulsion of certain particles in a vacuum. Almost 100 years later in the 18th century, the American Benjamin Franklin first coined the phrases positive and negative (later developed into proton and electron) for these particles with attractive and repulsive properties. Finally, in the 19th century Michael Faraday utilized his electrolysis process to discover the discrete nature of electric charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
The ability to understand electric fields helps set the basis for the introduction to [[Electric Force]] (as we discussed &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \mathbf{F}  = q\mathbf{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; ). The introduction of electric force will attach the specific charge of the particles with the electric field that they produce, resulting in the electric force. Electric force will lay the ground work for understanding the force that particles have in different systems and environments, and eventually lead to the introduction of [[Magnetic Force]].&lt;br /&gt;
The understanding of electric fields is a doorway into many various fields, only some of which will be covered in Physics 2212. The fundamental understanding of electric fields will prove to be very important further along when magnetic fields are introduced, as they share many qualities. The understanding of electric and magnetic fields will be used throughout the semester to learn about various electromagnetic concepts, and ultimately an understanding and application of Maxwell&#039;s Equations. &lt;br /&gt;
Please see related topics:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Electric Potential]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Electric Force]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Lorentz Force]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Electric Polarization]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Charged Ring]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EPIhhbwbCNc&amp;amp;list=PLX2gX-ftPVXUcMGbk1A7UbNtgadPsK5BD&amp;amp;index=9 A Youtube Playlist That Does A Great Job Going Step By Step And Reviewing Topics]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/estatics/Lesson-4/Electric-Field-Lines Further Review On Electric Field Lines.] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://phet.colorado.edu/en/simulation/charges-and-fields Get A Better Understanding Of Fields Through Hands On Manipulation In PhET. This Can Be Very Helpful For Getting An Intuitive Understanding Of Fields.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_field Wikipedia Electric Field]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://openstax.org/details/books/university-physics-volume-2 OpenStax Volume on Electricity and Magnetism]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Hayt &amp;amp; Buck 9th Edition Engineering Electromagnetics&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Matter and Interactions&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurence12799</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Field&amp;diff=38485</id>
		<title>Electric Field</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electric_Field&amp;diff=38485"/>
		<updated>2020-02-09T16:13:51Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurence12799: /* References */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
In this page, the concept of an electric field produced by an electric point charge will be described qualitatively and quantitatively through models, examples, and a simulation. An electric field is a useful concept to describe how any charged particle would affect charge around it through the Coulomb force. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric field of a point charge is spherically symmetric, meaning it is the same at all points of equal radius from the source. Hence, it is useful to speak of the electric field at a certain radius (not at a certain &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x,y,z)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; position), which will be done in [[electric Field#A Mathematical Model| the mathematical model]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Keep in mind, the electric field is a vector quantity. meaning it has a magnitude and direction. The SI units are N/C.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
The electric field vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bigl( \mathbf{E}_{s} \bigl)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of a point source charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bigl( Q_{s} \bigl)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; gives the magnitude and direction of the electrostatic force vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bigl( \mathbf{F}_{s} \bigl)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; exerted on a unit charge (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; Coulomb) by &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q_{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as a function of position &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bigl( \mathbf{r} = (x,y,z) \bigl)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. More generally however, the electrostatic force vector exerted on any point charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bigl( q \bigl)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; by a point source charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bigl( Q_{s} \bigl)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is related to the source charge&#039;s electric field vector by:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{F}_{s} ( \mathbf{r} ) = |q| \mathbf{E}_{s} ( \mathbf{r} )&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This definition requires an understanding of the electrostatic force (Coulomb&#039;s Law), and its mathematical description. If you are not familiar with this yet, read over the [[Electric Force]] page and come back.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the electric force is defined as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{F}( \mathbf{r} ) = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_{o}}\frac{|q_{1} q_{2}|}{r^{2}} \hat{\mathbf{r}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\epsilon_{o}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the permittivity of free space with a value of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;8.854 \times 10^{-12} \frac{\text{C}^2}{\text{N} \cdot \text{m}^2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are point charges one and two, respectively&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the distance between the two point charges, which can also be written as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;|\mathbf{r}|&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, the magnitude of the vector connecting the two charges&#039; positions&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat{\mathbf{r}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the unit vector pointing from charge one to charge two, or from charge two to charge one, depending on whether the force on charge two or charge one is wanted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric field of a source charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q_{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{E}_{s} ( \mathbf{r}) &amp;amp; = \frac{\mathbf{F}_{s} ( \mathbf{r} )}{|q|} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp; = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_{o}}\frac{|Q_{s}|}{r^{2}}\hat{\mathbf{r}}&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Radially, the magnitude of a charge&#039;s electric field looks something like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MagnitudeofEField.jpg|center|700px|thumb|&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;2 \times 10^{-15} \ \text{C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; charge&#039;s electric field magnitude as a function of radius.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A point charge&#039;s electric field is also related to its electric potential. If you are unfamiliar with the idea of electric potential, then review these pages ([[Electric Field and Electric Potential]] and [[Electric Potential]]) and come back.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A charge&#039;s electric field and electric potential &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are related by:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab} = -\int_{\mathbf{b}}^{\mathbf{a}} \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V_{ab}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the potential difference between points &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{a}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{b}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the electric field&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d\mathbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is an infinitesimal length in the direction of the path between &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{a}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{b}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This relation is less useful for us unless we use a straight line approximation, such that:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
V_{ab} &amp;amp; = -\mathbf{E} \cdot \Delta \mathbf{L} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp; = - \bigl( E_{x}, E_{y}, E_{z} \bigl) \cdot \bigl( \Delta L_{x}, \Delta L_{y}, \Delta L_{z} \bigl) \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp; = - \bigl( E_{x}\Delta L_{x} + E_{y}\Delta L_{y} + E_{z}\Delta L_{z} \bigl) \\&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This leads to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} (x,y,z) = - \biggl( \frac{\Delta V_{x}}{\Delta L_{x}}, \frac{\Delta V_{y}}{\Delta L_{y}}, \frac{\Delta V_{z}}{\Delta L_{z}} \biggl)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By convention, the electric field due to a positive point charge always points away from itself, and the electric field of a negative point charge always points towards itself as shown below:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Posandnegefield.png|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Different charges will attract each other, and like charges will repel each other, as shown below:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Multiplechargeefield.png|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lastly, the principle of superposition is directly applicable to finding the electric field due to multiple point source charges, using the a vector sum:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{E}_{sum} (\mathbf{r}) &amp;amp; = \mathbf{E}_{1} + \mathbf{E}_{2} + \mathbf{E}_{3} + \cdots + \mathbf{E}_{N} \\ &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp; = \sum_{1}^{N} \mathbf{E}_{n} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp; = \sum_{1}^{N} \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{o}} \frac{|Q_{s_{n}}|}{r_{n}^{2}} \hat{\mathbf{r}}_n&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::*When using this, be careful to take note that the electric field of a negative charge points in the opposite direction as a positive charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Critical Formulas:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} ( \mathbf{r}) = \frac{\mathbf{F} ( \mathbf{r} )}{|q|}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
**&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} ( \mathbf{r}) = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_{o}}\frac{|Q|}{r^{2}}\hat{\mathbf{r}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
**&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} (x,y,z) = - \biggl( \frac{\Delta V_{x}}{\Delta L_{x}}, \frac{\Delta V_{y}}{\Delta L_{y}}, \frac{\Delta V_{z}}{\Delta L_{z}} \biggl)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
**&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{sum} (\mathbf{r}) = \sum_{1}^{N} \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{o}} \frac{|Q_{s_{n}}|}{r_{n}^{2}} \hat{\mathbf{r}}_n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:NormalEField.png|right|250px|thumb|Normal view of simulated electric field]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    ###--Create Electric Field Lines of a Positive Charge at the Origin--###&lt;br /&gt;
    #==============================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Import statements for VPython---#&lt;br /&gt;
    from __future__ import division&lt;br /&gt;
    from visual import *&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Import function used to find combinations---#&lt;br /&gt;
    from itertools import combinations&lt;br /&gt;
    #==============================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Create scene---#&lt;br /&gt;
    scene.center = vector(0,0,0)  #-Position of source charge-#&lt;br /&gt;
    scene.height = 800  #-Set height of frame of scene-#&lt;br /&gt;
    scene.width = 800  #-Set width of frame of scene-#&lt;br /&gt;
    scene.range = 4  #-Set range of scene-#&lt;br /&gt;
    scene.userzoom = 1  #-Allow user to zoom in/out: CTRL &amp;amp; move in/out on trackpad-#&lt;br /&gt;
    scene.userspin = 1  #-Allow user to rotate camera angle: SHIFT &amp;amp; OPTION &amp;amp; move around on track pad-#&lt;br /&gt;
    #==============================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Specify point charge attributes---#&lt;br /&gt;
    sourceCharge = 3*10**(-11)  #-Coulombs of charge-#&lt;br /&gt;
    sourcePos = vector(0,0,0) #-Position of source charge-#&lt;br /&gt;
    ###--Modeling source point charge as a sphere with radius 0.1 meters--###&lt;br /&gt;
    sourceObj = sphere(pos = sourcePos, radius = 0.1, color = color.cyan)&lt;br /&gt;
    #==============================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Set range (0 to 3) and possible inputs for the coordinates (0.5 step)---#&lt;br /&gt;
    ###--Many of the same number included to allow for combinations such as (1,1,1).&lt;br /&gt;
        #The itertools.combinations function will only use each element of the...&lt;br /&gt;
        #list once, starting from the beginning.&lt;br /&gt;
        #Repeating each coordinate many times with intermixing, grants...&lt;br /&gt;
    [[File:CenteredAndDistantEField.png|right|250px|thumb|Distant view of simulated electric field]]&lt;br /&gt;
        #all combinations of points, with repeats however.&lt;br /&gt;
        #Later, a for loop will be used to eliminate repeats.&lt;br /&gt;
        #This can be optimized later if need be.---------------###&lt;br /&gt;
    posXYZ = [0, -0.5, 1, -1.5, 2, -2.5, 3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, 0.5, -1, 1.5, -2, 2.5, -3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, -0.5, 1, -1.5, 2, -2.5, 3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, 0.5, -1, 1.5, -2, 2.5, -3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, -0.5, 1, -1.5, 2, -2.5, 3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, 0.5, -1, 1.5, -2, 2.5, -3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, -0.5, 1, -1.5, 2, -2.5, 3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, 0.5, -1, 1.5, -2, 2.5, -3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, -0.5, 1, -1.5, 2, -2.5, 3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, 0.5, -1, 1.5, -2, 2.5, -3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, -0.5, 1, -1.5, 2, -2.5, 3,&lt;br /&gt;
              0, 0.5, -1, 1.5, -2, 2.5, -3]&lt;br /&gt;
    #==============================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:RotatedAndZoomedInEField.png|right|250px|thumb|Rotated and zoomed in view of simulated electric field]]&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Create combinations of points (x,y,z) for later use---#&lt;br /&gt;
        ###--prelimPoints will be a list of tuples of tuples--##&lt;br /&gt;
            #ie: [((,,),(,,),(,,),(,,)) , ((,,),(,,)) ,..., ((,,),(,,))]&lt;br /&gt;
    prelimPoints = [tuple(combinations(posXYZ, 3))]&lt;br /&gt;
    ###--Pull the points out of the grouping tuples and add them to a...&lt;br /&gt;
        #new list alphaPoints------------------------###&lt;br /&gt;
    alphaPoints = []&lt;br /&gt;
    for groupingTuple in prelimPoints:&lt;br /&gt;
        for XYZ in groupingTuple:&lt;br /&gt;
            if XYZ not in alphaPoints:  #-Check for repeat (x,y,z)-#&lt;br /&gt;
                alphaPoints.append(XYZ)&lt;br /&gt;
            ##--The negative of this tuple may not be in the combinations:&lt;br /&gt;
                #check to see-------------##&lt;br /&gt;
            first = -XYZ[0]&lt;br /&gt;
            second = -XYZ[1]&lt;br /&gt;
            third = -XYZ[2]&lt;br /&gt;
            negXYZ = (first, second, third)&lt;br /&gt;
            if negXYZ not in alphaPoints:&lt;br /&gt;
                alphaPoints.append(negXYZ)&lt;br /&gt;
            ##--Swap x and z coordinates for futher combination checking--##&lt;br /&gt;
            first = XYZ[2]&lt;br /&gt;
            second = XYZ[1]&lt;br /&gt;
            third = XYZ[0]&lt;br /&gt;
            reverseXYZ = (first, second, third)&lt;br /&gt;
            if reverseXYZ not in alphaPoints:&lt;br /&gt;
                alphaPoints.append(reverseXYZ)&lt;br /&gt;
            ##--The negative of the x and z coordinate swap may not be in...&lt;br /&gt;
                #the combinations: check to see---------##&lt;br /&gt;
            first = -XYZ[2]&lt;br /&gt;
            second = -XYZ[1]&lt;br /&gt;
            third = -XYZ[0]&lt;br /&gt;
            reverseXYZneg = (first, second, third)&lt;br /&gt;
            if reverseXYZneg not in alphaPoints:&lt;br /&gt;
                alphaPoints.append(reverseXYZneg)&lt;br /&gt;
            ##--Make x [3], y [0], and z [1] to check for more combinations--##&lt;br /&gt;
            first = XYZ[1]&lt;br /&gt;
            second = XYZ[2]&lt;br /&gt;
            third = XYZ[0]&lt;br /&gt;
            shiftedXYZ = (first, second, third)&lt;br /&gt;
            if shiftedXYZ not in alphaPoints:&lt;br /&gt;
                alphaPoints.append(shiftedXYZ)&lt;br /&gt;
            ##--The negative of the shifted XYZ may not be in the combinations:&lt;br /&gt;
                #check to see---------------##&lt;br /&gt;
            first = -XYZ[1]&lt;br /&gt;
            second = -XYZ[2]&lt;br /&gt;
            third = -XYZ[0]&lt;br /&gt;
            shiftedXYZneg = (first, second, third)&lt;br /&gt;
            if shiftedXYZneg not in alphaPoints:&lt;br /&gt;
                alphaPoints.append(shiftedXYZneg)&lt;br /&gt;
    ###--------This should be enough recombining---------###&lt;br /&gt;
    #================================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SideAngleAndTopViewEField.png|right|250px|thumb|Rotated top view of simulated electric field]]&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Create a new list of tuples that contain the points, magnitude,...&lt;br /&gt;
        #and direction (betaPoints)-----------#&lt;br /&gt;
            #ie: [((x,y,z), mag((x,y,z)), norm((x,y,z))),...]&lt;br /&gt;
    betaPoints = []&lt;br /&gt;
    for XYZ in alphaPoints:&lt;br /&gt;
        Mag = mag(XYZ)&lt;br /&gt;
        Dir = norm(XYZ)&lt;br /&gt;
        betaPoints.append((XYZ, Mag, Dir))&lt;br /&gt;
    #================================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Sort the tuples based on their magnitudes from least to greatest...&lt;br /&gt;
       #using sorted().&lt;br /&gt;
            #key = lamda x: x[1] tells the sorted function to sort the tuples...&lt;br /&gt;
                #based on their second component...their magnitudes--------#&lt;br /&gt;
    charliePoints = sorted(betaPoints, key = lambda x: x[1])&lt;br /&gt;
    #================================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Calculate parts of electric field equation:&lt;br /&gt;
        #E = 1/(4*pi*epsilon0) * Q/(magnitude)**2&lt;br /&gt;
    epsilonO = 8.854*(10**(-12)) #-N*(m/C)**2-#&lt;br /&gt;
    k = 1/(4*pi*(epsilonO)) #-N*(m/C)**2-#&lt;br /&gt;
    chargeContri = k*sourceCharge #-N*(m**2/C)-#&lt;br /&gt;
    #================================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Loop through points and find mag of electric field:&lt;br /&gt;
        #add it to a new list with the existing tuple info-------#&lt;br /&gt;
    deltaPoints = []&lt;br /&gt;
    for XYZ in charliePoints:&lt;br /&gt;
        try:  ###-Avoid divide by 0 error in (x,y,z) = (0,0,0)-###&lt;br /&gt;
            magEfield = chargeContri*(1/(XYZ[1])**2)&lt;br /&gt;
        except:&lt;br /&gt;
            magEfield = 0&lt;br /&gt;
        tupEfield = (XYZ[0], XYZ[1], XYZ[2], magEfield)&lt;br /&gt;
        deltaPoints.append(tupEfield)&lt;br /&gt;
    #================================================================#&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SIdeAngleAndSideViewEField.png|right|250px|thumb|Side angle of simulated electric field]]&lt;br /&gt;
    #---Loop through points and create an arrow at that point proportional in...&lt;br /&gt;
        #length to the magnitude of the electric field there.&lt;br /&gt;
        #Also, the arrow points in the direction of the electric field there.&lt;br /&gt;
        #Color coding is based on 0.25 meter increments:&lt;br /&gt;
            #stronger field = redder; weaker field = blue&lt;br /&gt;
    for XYZ in deltaPoints:&lt;br /&gt;
        if XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 0.25:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*0.5&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.000, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*0.2,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*0.25)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 0.5:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*0.7&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.200, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*0.2,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*0.25)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 1:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*0.9&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.300, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*0.2,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*0.25)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 1.25:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*1.1&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.400, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*0.2,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*0.25)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 1.5:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*1.3&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.500, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*1,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*1)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 1.75:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*1.5&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.600, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*1,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*1)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 2:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*1.7&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.700, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*1,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*1)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 2.25:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*1.9&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.800, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*1,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*1)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 2.5:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*2.1&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 0.900, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*1,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*1)&lt;br /&gt;
        elif XYZ[1] &amp;lt;= 2.75:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*2.3&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = vector(1.000, 1.000, 0.000),&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*1,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*1)&lt;br /&gt;
        else:&lt;br /&gt;
            lengthP = XYZ[3]*2.5&lt;br /&gt;
            arroW = arrow(pos=vector(XYZ[0]), axis=XYZ[2],&lt;br /&gt;
                          color = color.blue,&lt;br /&gt;
                          length = lengthP,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headwidth = lengthP*1,&lt;br /&gt;
                          headlength = lengthP*1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Also, at this link [https://phet.colorado.edu/en/simulation/charges-and-fields Charges and Fields] is a PhET simulation of electric fields. Play with it if you like.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Question&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
::In the following figure, the red circles represent positive point charges, and the blue circles represent negative point charges. If the yellow arrows are meant to represent the point charge&#039;s electric field lines, &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;which field(s) and charge(s) are correctly matched?&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039; (Only take into account direction)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricFieldSimpleExample.png|600px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Solution&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
::Since electric field lines always point away from a positive point charge, Option (C.) cannot be correct. Likewise, electric field lines always point towards a negative charge. Therefore, Option (A.) is also incorrect.&lt;br /&gt;
::Option (B.) shows a positive charge with an electric field pointing radially outwards. This is correct. Option (D.) shows a negative charge with an electric field pointing radially inwards. This is also correct.&lt;br /&gt;
:::&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer:&#039;&#039;&#039; Options (B.) &amp;amp; (D.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Question&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:: Four point charges &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\big(q_{1}, q_{2}, q_{3}, \text{and} \ q_{4} \big)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, are each located at a distance &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; along either the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; or &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; axes, as shown in the figure below. &lt;br /&gt;
:*&#039;&#039;&#039;A.)&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;What is the net electric field at the origin?&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:*&#039;&#039;&#039;B.)&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;If &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\ |q_{3}| = |q_{1}| \ \text{and} \ |q_{4}| = |q_{2}|&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; what does the electric field at the origin reduce to?&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricFieldMiddlingExample.png|600px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Solution&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:*&#039;&#039;&#039;A.)&#039;&#039;&#039; To find the net electric field at the origin, we must first find the electric field due to each charge at the origin. &lt;br /&gt;
::*Starting with &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, its general electric field can be described as:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{1} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{1}|}{r_{1}^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}}_{1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is measured relative to the location of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
::::The origin is a distance &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; away from &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, which is along the y-axis. Since it is a positive charge, its electric field at the origin will point &amp;quot;down&amp;quot; the y-axis (away from the charge):&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{1} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{1}|}{d^2} (-\mathbf{j})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{j}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the unit vector in the y-direction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*For &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; we have:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{2} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{2}|}{r_{2}^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}}_{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is measured relative to the location of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
::::The origin is a distance &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; away from &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, which is along the x-axis. Since it is a positive charge, its electric field at the origin will point to the left (away from the charge):&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{2} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{2}|}{d^2} (-\mathbf{i})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{i}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the unit vector in the x-direction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*For &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; we have:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{3} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{3}|}{r_{3}^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}}_{3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is measured relative to the location of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
::::The origin is a distance &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; away from &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, which is along the y-axis. Since it is a negative charge, its electric field at the origin will point &amp;quot;down&amp;quot; the y-axis (towards the charge):&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{3} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{3}|}{d^2} (-\mathbf{j})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{j}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the same unit vector in the y-direction from earlier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*For &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{4}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the electric field is:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{4} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{4}|}{r_{4}^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}}_{4}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r_{4}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is measured relative to the location of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{4}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
::::The origin is a distance &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; away from &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q_{4}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, which is along the x-axis. Since it is a positive charge, its electric field at the origin will point to the right (away from the charge):&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{4} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{4}|}{d^2} (\mathbf{i})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{i}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the same unit vector in the x-direction from earlier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Now that we have the four electric fields present at the origin, we can use the principle of superposition to find the &#039;&#039;&#039;net&#039;&#039;&#039; electric field at the origin:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{E}_{net} &amp;amp;= \mathbf{E}_{1} + \mathbf{E}_{2} + \mathbf{E}_{3} + \mathbf{E}_{4} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{1}|}{d^2} (-\mathbf{j}) + \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{2}|}{d^2} (-\mathbf{i}) + \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{3}|}{d^2} (-\mathbf{j}) + \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{4}|}{d^2} (\mathbf{i}) \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} \Big[ -|q_{1}| \mathbf{j} -|q_{2}| \mathbf{i} -|q_{3}| \mathbf{j} + |q_{4}| \mathbf{i} \Big] \\&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{E}_{net} &amp;amp;= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} \Big[ \big( |q_{4}| - |q_{2}| \big)\mathbf{i} - \big( |q_{1}| + |q_{3}| \big)\mathbf{j} \Big]&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricFieldMiddlingExampleAnswer.png|400px|right|thumb|Part &#039;&#039;&#039;(B)&#039;&#039;&#039; answer]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*&#039;&#039;&#039;B.)&#039;&#039;&#039; We will simply plug in the specified values into our answer from &#039;&#039;&#039;(A)&#039;&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{E}_{net} &amp;amp;= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} \Big[ \big( |q_{4}| - |q_{2}| \big)\mathbf{i} - \big( |q_{1}| + |q_{3}| \big)\mathbf{j} \Big] \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} \Big[ \big( |q_{2}| - |q_{2}| \big)\mathbf{i} - \big( |q_{1}| + |q_{1}| \big)\mathbf{j} \Big] \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} \Big[ 0 \mathbf{i} - 2|q_{1}| \mathbf{j} \Big] \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} \Big[ - 2|q_{1}| \mathbf{j} \Big] \\&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{E}_{net} &amp;amp;= - \frac{1}{2 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} |q_{1}| \mathbf{j} \\&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&#039;&#039;&#039;Answer:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
:::*&#039;&#039;&#039;A.)&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{net} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} \Big[ \big( |q_{4}| - |q_{2}| \big)\mathbf{i} - \big( |q_{1}| + |q_{3}| \big)\mathbf{j} \Big]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::*&#039;&#039;&#039;B.)&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E}_{net} = - \frac{1}{2 \pi \epsilon_{0} d^{2}} |q_{1}| \mathbf{j}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Question&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
::A ring of evenly distributed charge of radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is centered on the origin in the xy-plane. The ring has a total charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;Show that the electric field due to this ring is 0 at the origin.&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectricFieldDifficultExample.png|600px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Solution&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
::The electric field due to a point charge is given by:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|Q|}{| \mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;} |^{2}} \frac{\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;}}{| \mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;} |}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::This equation is equivalent to the formula presented in the [[Electric Field#A Mathematical Model | Mathematical Model]]. The reason it looks so different is due to a few assumptions in the mathematical model that we have stopped using:&lt;br /&gt;
:::# The source charge is located at the origin (our ring of charge is around the origin)&lt;br /&gt;
:::# The distance between the source charge and the observing location is simply expressed as a distance &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (like in the [[Electric Field#Middling| Middling Example]]). Now, instead we will represent the distance as the magnitude of the difference in position between the source and observer &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\big( | \mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;} | \big)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
:::# Subsequently, our unit vector in the direction of the field &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\big( \hat{\mathbf{r}} \big)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is not simply expressed as a typical unit vector (like in the middling example). It has now become the vector joining the source and observer divided by the magnitude of this same vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bigg( \frac{\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;}}{| \mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;} |} \bigg) &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Another complication this problem presents is:&lt;br /&gt;
::::Where is the source charge?&lt;br /&gt;
:::To answer this, notice that the ring has an evenly distributed TOTAL charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and a radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Also, notice that the &amp;quot;source&amp;quot; position is constantly changing as you go around the ring. This issue makes it much more convenient to speak of the line charge DENSITY at a point along the ring instead of the TOTAL charge. The line charge density is simply the charge on the line divided by the length of that line (circumference), since the charge is evenly distributed about the ring:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\rho_{L} = \frac{Q}{2 \pi a}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This allows us to represent a differential amount of source charge as a product of the line charge density and a differential length:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;dQ = \rho_{L} dL&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The next question is: What is a differential length around the ring?&lt;br /&gt;
:::The differential length is a differential arc length &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(s = r \theta)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; around the circle dependent on the change in angle:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;dL = a d\theta&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
dQ &amp;amp;= \frac{Q}{2 \pi a} a d\theta \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= \frac{Q}{2 \pi} d\theta \\&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Now we can sum each of these differential source charge&#039;s contribution to the electric field at the origin using an integral:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} = \int \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{\frac{Q}{2 \pi} d\theta}{| \mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;} |^{2}} \frac{\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;}}{| \mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;} |}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The only things left to find are the generic source position (a vector that can describe the position of each differential source charge along the ring) and the observer location. The observer location is given to us; the origin:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{r} = 0\mathbf{i} +0\mathbf{j} + 0\mathbf{k}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The source position is easiest to described as a radius from the origin:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{r}^{&#039;} = a \hat{ \mathbf{a}}_{r}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat{\mathbf{a}}_{r}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a unit vector in the radial direction&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;} &amp;amp;= \big( 0\mathbf{i} +0\mathbf{j} + 0\mathbf{k} \big) - \big( a\hat{ \mathbf{a}}_{r} \big) \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= -a\hat{ \mathbf{a}}_{r} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}^{&#039;}| &amp;amp;= \sqrt{(-a)^{2}} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= a \\&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Plugging these into the electric field integral gives:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{E} &amp;amp;= \int \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{\frac{Q}{2 \pi} d\theta}{a^2} \frac{-a \hat{ \mathbf{a}}_{r}}{a} \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= - \int \frac{1}{8 {\pi}^{2} \epsilon_{0}} \frac{Q}{a^2} \hat{ \mathbf{a}}_{r} d\theta \\&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;= - \frac{Q}{a^{2} 8 {\pi}^{2} \epsilon_{0}} \int \hat{ \mathbf{a}}_{r} d\theta \\&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\theta&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the angle from the x-axis. &lt;br /&gt;
::*To integrate over the entire ring, we set the bounds of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\theta&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;[0, 2 \pi)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
::*Also, as of right now, the integral would not evaluate to 0. This is because &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat{ \mathbf{a}}_{r}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; has a hidden dependence on &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\theta&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat{ \mathbf{a}}_{r} = \text{cos}( \theta) \mathbf{i} + \text{sin}( \theta) \mathbf{j}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Plugging this information in gives:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{alignat}{3}&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbf{E} &amp;amp;= - \frac{Q}{a^{2} 8 {\pi}^{2} \epsilon_{0}} \int_{0}^{2 \pi} \big( \text{cos}( \theta) \mathbf{i} + \text{sin}( \theta) \mathbf{j} \big) d\theta \\&lt;br /&gt;
\int_{0}^{2 \pi} \text{cos}( \theta) \mathbf{i} \ d\theta &amp;amp;= 0 \\&lt;br /&gt;
\int_{0}^{2 \pi} \text{sin}( \theta) \mathbf{j} \ d\theta &amp;amp;= 0 \\&lt;br /&gt;
\end{alignat}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{E} = 0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at the origin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
The real world applications of electric fields are endless. Here are some:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:electricmotor.jpg|400px|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Electric Motors:&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Electric motors convert electrical energy into mechanical energy through electric fields. Whenever electric motors are turned on, electric fields are generated. This is because in order to turn an electric motor, an electric field must first be generated, which then generates a magnetic field, thus making the motor spin. Electric motors are used in cars, elevators, fans, refrigerators, and many more applications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Computers:&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Computers use circuits, electric fans, and transistors to work. All of these use electric fields to push charge through a circuit, spin the fan, and allow logic to be implemented in electronics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Painting:&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Electric fields are also used in some paintings. The electric field generates charges on the surface of the material being painted on, and an opposite charge is generated on the paint. Paint that touches the material sticks, and excess paint falls off to go back into the system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Cancer Treatment:&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Recently, weak electric fields have been used to kill cancer cells. This treatment works best for brain and breast cancers, and it has no effect on normal cells. In lab and animal tests, this treatment killed cancer cells of every type tested; however, this is still a developing treatment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
Electric fields are created by electric charges. The original discovery of the electric charge is not explicitly known, but in 1675 the esteemed chemist Robert Boyle, known for Boyle&#039;s Law, discovered the attraction and repulsion of certain particles in a vacuum. Almost 100 years later in the 18th century, the American Benjamin Franklin first coined the phrases positive and negative (later developed into proton and electron) for these particles with attractive and repulsive properties. Finally, in the 19th century Michael Faraday utilized his electrolysis process to discover the discrete nature of electric charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
The ability to understand electric fields helps set the basis for the introduction to [[Electric Force]] (as we discussed &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \mathbf{F}  = q\mathbf{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; ). The introduction of electric force will attach the specific charge of the particles with the electric field that they produce, resulting in the electric force. Electric force will lay the ground work for understanding the force that particles have in different systems and environments, and eventually lead to the introduction of [[Magnetic Force]].&lt;br /&gt;
The understanding of electric fields is a doorway into many various fields, only some of which will be covered in Physics 2212. The fundamental understanding of electric fields will prove to be very important further along when magnetic fields are introduced, as they share many qualities. The understanding of electric and magnetic fields will be used throughout the semester to learn about various electromagnetic concepts, and ultimately an understanding and application of Maxwell&#039;s Equations. &lt;br /&gt;
Please see related topics:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Electric Potential]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Electric Force]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Lorentz Force]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Electric Polarization]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Charged Ring]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EPIhhbwbCNc&amp;amp;list=PLX2gX-ftPVXUcMGbk1A7UbNtgadPsK5BD&amp;amp;index=9 A Youtube Playlist That Does A Great Job Going Step By Step And Reviewing Topics]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/estatics/Lesson-4/Electric-Field-Lines Further Review On Electric Field Lines.] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://phet.colorado.edu/en/simulation/charges-and-fields Get A Better Understanding Of Fields Through Hands On Manipulation In PhET. This Can Be Very Helpful For Getting An Intuitive Understanding Of Fields.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_field Wikipedia Electric Field]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://openstax.org/details/books/university-physics-volume-2 OpenStax Volume on Electricity and Magnetism]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Hayt &amp;amp; Buck 9th Edition Engineering Electromagnetics&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Matter and Intercations&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurence12799</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>