<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Samigues3</id>
	<title>Physics Book - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Samigues3"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Special:Contributions/Samigues3"/>
	<updated>2026-05-01T04:37:07Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.42.7</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electromagnetic_Radiation&amp;diff=29510</id>
		<title>Electromagnetic Radiation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electromagnetic_Radiation&amp;diff=29510"/>
		<updated>2017-11-25T15:29:37Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Samigues3: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Claimed by Carlos Fernandez to edit (Spring 2016) &#039;&#039;&#039;Claimed by Sungyoung Joo(FALL 2016)&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;quot;&#039;Claimed by Monali Shah to edit (Spring 2017)&lt;br /&gt;
Claimed by Solange Amigues to edite (Fall 2017)&lt;br /&gt;
==Electromagnetic Radiation==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===What is a Electromagnetic(EM) Radiation?===&lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic radiation is a form of energy that is all around us and takes many forms, such as radio waves, microwaves, infrared, visible light, ultraviolet, x-rays, and gamma rays. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before 1873, electricity and magnetism were thought to be two different forces. However, in 1873, Scottish Physicist James Maxwell developed his famous theory of electromagnetism. There are four main electro magnetic interactions according to Maxwell:&lt;br /&gt;
* The force of attraction or repulsion between electric charges is inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them&lt;br /&gt;
* Magnetic poles come in pairs that attract and repel each other much as electric charges do&lt;br /&gt;
* An electric current in a wire produces a magnetic field whose direction depends on the direction of the current&lt;br /&gt;
* A moving electric field produces a magnetic field, and vice versa&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===General Properties===&lt;br /&gt;
The four Maxwell&#039;s Equations provide a complete description of possible spatial patterns of electric and magnetic field in space. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Ampere-Maxwell Law]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gauss&#039;s Law]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Faraday&#039;s Law]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other than Maxwell&#039;s Four equations, there are general properties of all electromagnetic radiation:&lt;br /&gt;
* Electromagnetic radiation can travel through empty space. Most other types of waves must travel through some sort of substance. For example, sound waves need either a gas, solid, or liquid to pass through in order to be heard&lt;br /&gt;
* The speed of light is always a constant (3 x 10^8 m/s)&lt;br /&gt;
* Wavelengths are measured between the distances of either crests or troughs. It is usually characterized by the Greek symbol λ (gamma).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic waves are the self-propagating, mutual oscillation of electric and magnetic fields. The propagation of electromagnetic energy is often referred to as radiation. We can also say that the &#039;pulse&#039; of these moving fields result in radiation (7).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The equation for propagation is E=cB with c being the speed of light. This equation is derived from combining the two equations E=vB and B=u0e0vE, proving that v is equal to 3e8 meters/second. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Problem Solving Method and Equations===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To go about solving/analyzing mathematically an electromagnetic field using Maxwell&#039;s equations,this is how we proceed (7)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Establish the space and time in which the electric and magnetic fields are present&lt;br /&gt;
*Check that Maxwell&#039;s equations can be applied in the situation above&lt;br /&gt;
*Check when the charge accelerates, it produces these fields and therefore radiation&lt;br /&gt;
*Show how these fields would interact with matter&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The equation of the Radiative Electric Field is:&lt;br /&gt;
E= 1/(4πe0)*-qa/(c^2r) where a is the acceleration of the particle, c is the speed of light and r is the distance from the original location of the charge to right before the kink. This kink happens on the electric field because of the slight delay when the charge is moved. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fields Made by Charges and Fields Made by Monopoles===&lt;br /&gt;
We can differentiate fields made by charges and the ones made by magnetic monopoles. (7)&lt;br /&gt;
For fields made by charges, when the charge is&lt;br /&gt;
*at rest, E=1/r^2 and B=0&lt;br /&gt;
*constant speed, E=1/r^2 and B=1/r^2&lt;br /&gt;
*accelerating, E=1/r and B=1/r&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For fields made by magnetic monopoles, the first point would have E and B switched. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The EM Spectrum==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
EM spectrum is a span of enormous range of wavelengths and frequencies. The EM spectrum is generally divided into 7 different regions, in order of decreasing wavelength and increasing energy and frequency. It ranges from Gamma rays to Long Radio Waves. Following are the lists of waves:&lt;br /&gt;
* Gamma rays&lt;br /&gt;
* X-rays&lt;br /&gt;
* UV rays&lt;br /&gt;
* Visible Light&lt;br /&gt;
* Infrared Rays&lt;br /&gt;
* Microwave&lt;br /&gt;
* Radio, TV&lt;br /&gt;
* Long radio waves&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:em-spectrum.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although all these waves do different things, there is one thing in common : They all travel in waves.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:spectrum_Properties.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Infrared radiation&#039;&#039;&#039; can be released as heat or thermal energy. It can also be bounced back, which is called near infrared because of its similarities with visible light energy. Infrared Radiation is most commonly used in remote sensing as infrared sensors collect thermal energy, providing us with weather conditions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:pic_snap_girl.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Visible Light&#039;&#039;&#039; is the only part of the electromagnetic spectrum that humans can see with a naked eye. This part of the spectrum includes a range of different colors that all represent a particular wavelength. Rainbows are formed in this way; light passes through matter in which it is absorbed or reflected based on its wavelength. As a result, some colors are reflected more than other, leading to the creation of a rainbow.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:pyramid123.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:rainbow.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Waves and Fields==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As we learned in class, electric field is produced when an electron is accelerating. Likewise, EM radiation is created when an atomic particle, like an electron, is accelerated by an electric field. The movement like this produces oscillating electric and magnetic fields, which travel at right angles to each other in a bundle of light energy called a photon. Photons travel in a harmonic wave at the fastest speed possible in the universe. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:waves image.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic waves are formed when an electric field couples with a magnetic field. Magnetic and electric fields of an electromagnetic wave are perpendicular to each other and to the direction of the wave. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A wavelength (in m) is the distance between two consecutive peaks of a wave. Frequency is the number of waves that form in a given length of time. A wavelength and frequency are interrelated. A short wavelength indicates that the frequency will be higher because one cycle can pass in a shorter amount of time. Likewise, a longer wavelength has a lower frequency because each cycle takes longer to complete.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:waves_1.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Waves can be classified according to their nature:&lt;br /&gt;
* Mechanical waves&lt;br /&gt;
* Electromagnetic waves&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Mechanical Waves&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mechanical waves require a medium (matter) to travel through. &lt;br /&gt;
Examples are sound waves, water waves, ripples in strings or springs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Water Waves&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:waterwaves.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Sound Waves&#039;&#039;  &lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:loudspeaker-waveform.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electromagnetic Waves&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic waves do not require a medium (matter) to travel through - they can travel through space.&lt;br /&gt;
Examples are radio waves, visible light, x-rays.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;X-RAYS&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:x-rays.jpeg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Radio Waves&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:facts-about-radio-waves.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Visible Lights&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:visible-spectrum123.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==A Mathematical Model==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The position of the particle is defined by a sine wave:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;y = ymaxsin(wt)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where w is the angular frequency&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Amplitude&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Amplitude is the distance from the maximum vertical displacement of the wave to the middle of the wave. The Amplitude of the sinusoidal Wave is the height of the peak in the wave measured from the zero line. This measures the magnitude of oscillation of a particular wave. The Amplitude is important because it tells you the intensity or brightness of a wave in comparison with other waves.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Period&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The period of the wave is the time between crests in seconds(s).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
T = 2pi/w-----(units of seconds)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Frequency&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Frequency is the number of cycles per second, and is expressed as sec-1 or Hertz(Hz). Frequency is directly proportional to energy and can be express as &amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039; E = hv &#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
where E is energy, h is Planck&#039;s constant ( 6.62607*10^-34J) and v is frequency&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
f = 1/T&lt;br /&gt;
f = w/2pi----(Units Hertz)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Wavelength&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wavelength is the distance between crests in meters. Wavelength is equal to the speed of light times frequency. Longer wavelength waves such as radio waves carry low energy; this is why we can listen to the radio without any harmful consequences. Shorter wavelength waves such as x-rays carry higher energy that can be hazardous to our health. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:shortlongwavelength.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Wavelength and Frequency&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The speed of light is the multiplication of the wavelength and frequency. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;c=λν &#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:visible_EM_modes.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This diagram shows all properties of waves:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:wave_props.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;ENERGY FLUX&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is defined by the following equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         S = (1/u0)*(E x B) in W/m^2&lt;br /&gt;
         where B = E/c&lt;br /&gt;
         where c = speed of light&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:energy_flux.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness: X-Rays==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic Radiation while commonly thought of as only including visible light, radio waves, UV waves, and gamma rays; also include X-rays. In 1895, X-rays were initially discovered by William Roentgen, who accidentally fell upon the most important discovery about his life (Figure 1). Roentgen was already working on cathode rays, and because of a fluorescent glow that occurred during his experiments, covered his experimental apparatus with heavy black paper. However, when he did this, he discovered a glow coming from a screen several feet away. Through many more experiments, he discovered that a new type of energy, not cathode rays, were the cause of the glow. He named them “x-rays” and received the 1901 Nobel Prize in Physics. Roentgen never patented his monumental discovery and as a result, numerous researchers set out to find a multitude of uses and capitalize on his work.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Primarily, people could now view objects that were hidden from plain view (i.e. scanners in airports). While X-rays are now used in 100’s of professions (security, chemistry, art galleries), its most important function is to view bones to determine abnormalities in humans. In fact, one of Roentgen’s first x-rays was of his wife’s hand (Figure 2). X-rays fall under the scope of electromagnetic radiation because, like all E.R. waves, it is comprised of photons. X-rays have wavelengths between 0.01 to 10 nanometers and fall between UV and Gamma Waves on the E.R. spectrum (Figure 3).&lt;br /&gt;
There are two main methods in which an x-ray may be formed. Both require a vacuum-filled tube called an x-ray tube (Figure 4). With an anode on one end and a cathode on the other, an electric current is applied and a high energy electron is projected from the cathode, through the vacuum, and at the anode. In the characteristic x-ray generation approach, the electron from the cathode  collides with an inner shell electron on an atom on the anode (Figure 5). Both of these electrons are ejected from the atom and an outer shell electron takes the place of the inner shell one. Because the outer electron must have a lower energy to fill the inner shell hole, it releases a photon with the equivalent energy of the difference between the two energy levels in the atom. This photon is the x-ray that is used to view objects such as bones.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the Bremsstrahlung x-ray generation method, the electron from the cathode is slowed as it passes the nucleus of an atom at the anode (Figure 6). As it slows and its path is changed, the loses energy (kinetic energy). This energy is also released as a photon which is subsequently called an x-ray. &lt;br /&gt;
Depending on the voltage and current of the tube and the material of the anode, different types (as in wavelengths and energy) of x-rays can be produced and each one. However, all X-rays will continue to pass through objects until it reaches a material dense that stops it. However, density of the material required depends on the energy of the x-ray. For example, during a medical x-ray, x-rays of a certain energy will pass through soft tissue (skin, organs, etc) but not through bones. The x-rays that pass through the soft tissue will strike the screen and the absence of the x-rays absorbed by the bones will cause a negative space on the screen. The areas where x-rays do not strike will form the image of the bone. While the principles remain the same, x-ray machines today use incredible sophisticated technology to specify the type of x-ray they want and have greatly increased in accuracy since Roentgen’s initial discovery.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_1.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 2:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_2.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 3:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_3.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 4:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_4.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 5:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_5.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 6:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_6.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Information and photographs are pulled from references 1 through 5 cited below*&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Already, during the Ancient Greek and Roman times, light was studied as the presence of deflection and refraction were noticed. &lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic radiation of wavelengths in the early 19th century. The discovery of infrared radiation is ascribed to astronomer William Herschel, who published his results in 1800 before the Royal Society of London. Herschel used a glass Triangular prism (optics)|prism to refract light from the Sun and detected invisible rays that caused heating beyond the red part of the spectrum, through an increase in the temperature recorded with a thermometer. These &amp;quot;calorific rays&amp;quot; were later termed infrared.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1801, Rohann Ritter, discovered the presence of ultraviolet light using salts. It was known that light could darken some silver halides and while doing so, he realized that the region beyond the violet bar (therefore ultraviolet) was more effective in changing the color of the halides. &lt;br /&gt;
However,in 1864, while summarizing the theories of his time accumulating into his famous set of Maxwell equations, James Clerk Maxwell managed to deduce the speed of light being around 3e8 meters per second. This was instrumental in creating the rest of the spectrum. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1887-1888 Physicist Heinrich Hertz not only tried to measure the velocity and frequency of electromagnetic radiation waves at other parts of the known spectrum of the time, but he was also able to prove that Maxwell&#039;s findings were correct. He did this on the microwave radiation as well. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The discovery of X-rays occurred in 1895 by Wilhelm Rontgen when his barium platinocyanide detector screen began to glow under the presence of a discharge that passed through a cathode ray tube although the latter was completely covered. Once he determined its possible use, he tried to look at his wife&#039;s hand using this new discovery. However x-ray spectroscopy was not institutionalized until later by Karl Manne Siegbahn. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1900, Paul Villard discovered Gamma rays although he initially thought that they were particles similar to alpha and beta particles which were emitted during radiation. These &#039;particles&#039; were later proven to be part of the electromagnetic spectrum. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
1. Elert, Glenn. &amp;quot;X-rays.&amp;quot; X-rays – The Physics Hypertextbook. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Apr. 2017. &lt;br /&gt;
http://physics.info/x-ray/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.&amp;quot;X-rays.&amp;quot; X-rays. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Apr. 2017. http://www.physics.isu.edu/radinf/xray.htm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. &amp;quot;Basics of X-ray PhysicsX-ray production.&amp;quot; Welcome to Radiology Masterclass. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Apr. 2017. http://www.radiologymasterclass.co.uk/tutorials/physics/x-ray_physics_production#top_2nd_img&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. &amp;quot;X-Rays.&amp;quot; Image: Electromagnetic Spectrum. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Apr. 2017. https://www.boundless.com/physics/textbooks/boundless-physics-textbook/electromagnetic-waves-23/the-electromagnetic-spectrum-165/x-rays-597-11175/images/electromagnetic-spectrum/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. &amp;quot;This Month in Physics History.&amp;quot; American Physical Society. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Apr. 2017. https://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/200111/history.cfm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. Editors, Spectroscopy. “The Electromagnetic Spectrum: A History.” Spectroscopy Home, 27 Oct. 2017, www.spectroscopyonline.com/electromagnetic-spectrum-history?id=&amp;amp;sk=&amp;amp;date=&amp;amp;&amp;amp;pageID=4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7. Chabay, Ruth W., and Bruce A. Sherwood. Matter &amp;amp; Interaction II: Electric &amp;amp; Magnetic Interactions, Version 1.2. John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons, 2003.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Samigues3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electromagnetic_Radiation&amp;diff=29509</id>
		<title>Electromagnetic Radiation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electromagnetic_Radiation&amp;diff=29509"/>
		<updated>2017-11-25T15:24:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Samigues3: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Claimed by Carlos Fernandez to edit (Spring 2016) &#039;&#039;&#039;Claimed by Sungyoung Joo(FALL 2016)&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;quot;&#039;Claimed by Monali Shah to edit (Spring 2017)&lt;br /&gt;
Claimed by Solange Amigues to edite (Fall 2017)&lt;br /&gt;
==Electromagnetic Radiation==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===What is a Electromagnetic(EM) Radiation?===&lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic radiation is a form of energy that is all around us and takes many forms, such as radio waves, microwaves, infrared, visible light, ultraviolet, x-rays, and gamma rays. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before 1873, electricity and magnetism were thought to be two different forces. However, in 1873, Scottish Physicist James Maxwell developed his famous theory of electromagnetism. There are four main electro magnetic interactions according to Maxwell:&lt;br /&gt;
* The force of attraction or repulsion between electric charges is inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them&lt;br /&gt;
* Magnetic poles come in pairs that attract and repel each other much as electric charges do&lt;br /&gt;
* An electric current in a wire produces a magnetic field whose direction depends on the direction of the current&lt;br /&gt;
* A moving electric field produces a magnetic field, and vice versa&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The four Maxwell&#039;s Equations provide a complete description of possible spatial patterns of electric and magnetic field in space. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Ampere-Maxwell Law]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gauss&#039;s Law]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Faraday&#039;s Law]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other than Maxwell&#039;s Four equations, there are general properties of all electromagnetic radiation:&lt;br /&gt;
* Electromagnetic radiation can travel through empty space. Most other types of waves must travel through some sort of substance. For example, sound waves need either a gas, solid, or liquid to pass through in order to be heard&lt;br /&gt;
* The speed of light is always a constant (3 x 10^8 m/s)&lt;br /&gt;
* Wavelengths are measured between the distances of either crests or troughs. It is usually characterized by the Greek symbol λ (gamma).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic waves are the self-propagating, mutual oscillation of electric and magnetic fields. The propagation of electromagnetic energy is often referred to as radiation. We can also say that the &#039;pulse&#039; of these moving fields result in radiation (7).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The equation for propagation is E=cB with c being the speed of light. This equation is derived from combining the two equations E=vB and B=u0e0vE, proving that v is equal to 3e8 meters/second. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To go about solving/analyzing mathematically an electromagnetic field using Maxwell&#039;s equations,this is how we proceed (7)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Establish the space and time in which the electric and magnetic fields are present&lt;br /&gt;
*Check that Maxwell&#039;s equations can be applied in the situation above&lt;br /&gt;
*Check when the charge accelerates, it produces these fields and therefore radiation&lt;br /&gt;
*Show how these fields would interact with matter&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The equation of the Radiative Electric Field is:&lt;br /&gt;
E= 1/(4πe0)*-qa/(c^2r) where a is the acceleration of the particle, c is the speed of light and r is the distance from the original location of the charge to right before the kink. This kink happens on the electric field because of the slight delay when the charge is moved. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We can differentiate fields made by charges and the ones made by magnetic monopoles. (7)&lt;br /&gt;
For fields made by charges, when the charge is&lt;br /&gt;
*at rest, E=1/r^2 and B=0&lt;br /&gt;
*constant speed, E=1/r^2 and B=1/r^2&lt;br /&gt;
*accelerating, E=1/r and B=1/r&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For fields made by magnetic monopoles, the first point would have E and B switched. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The EM Spectrum==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
EM spectrum is a span of enormous range of wavelengths and frequencies. The EM spectrum is generally divided into 7 different regions, in order of decreasing wavelength and increasing energy and frequency. It ranges from Gamma rays to Long Radio Waves. Following are the lists of waves:&lt;br /&gt;
* Gamma rays&lt;br /&gt;
* X-rays&lt;br /&gt;
* UV rays&lt;br /&gt;
* Visible Light&lt;br /&gt;
* Infrared Rays&lt;br /&gt;
* Microwave&lt;br /&gt;
* Radio, TV&lt;br /&gt;
* Long radio waves&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:em-spectrum.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although all these waves do different things, there is one thing in common : They all travel in waves.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:spectrum_Properties.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Infrared radiation&#039;&#039;&#039; can be released as heat or thermal energy. It can also be bounced back, which is called near infrared because of its similarities with visible light energy. Infrared Radiation is most commonly used in remote sensing as infrared sensors collect thermal energy, providing us with weather conditions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:pic_snap_girl.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Visible Light&#039;&#039;&#039; is the only part of the electromagnetic spectrum that humans can see with a naked eye. This part of the spectrum includes a range of different colors that all represent a particular wavelength. Rainbows are formed in this way; light passes through matter in which it is absorbed or reflected based on its wavelength. As a result, some colors are reflected more than other, leading to the creation of a rainbow.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:pyramid123.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:rainbow.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Waves and Fields==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As we learned in class, electric field is produced when an electron is accelerating. Likewise, EM radiation is created when an atomic particle, like an electron, is accelerated by an electric field. The movement like this produces oscillating electric and magnetic fields, which travel at right angles to each other in a bundle of light energy called a photon. Photons travel in a harmonic wave at the fastest speed possible in the universe. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:waves image.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic waves are formed when an electric field couples with a magnetic field. Magnetic and electric fields of an electromagnetic wave are perpendicular to each other and to the direction of the wave. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A wavelength (in m) is the distance between two consecutive peaks of a wave. Frequency is the number of waves that form in a given length of time. A wavelength and frequency are interrelated. A short wavelength indicates that the frequency will be higher because one cycle can pass in a shorter amount of time. Likewise, a longer wavelength has a lower frequency because each cycle takes longer to complete.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:waves_1.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Waves can be classified according to their nature:&lt;br /&gt;
* Mechanical waves&lt;br /&gt;
* Electromagnetic waves&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Mechanical Waves&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mechanical waves require a medium (matter) to travel through. &lt;br /&gt;
Examples are sound waves, water waves, ripples in strings or springs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Water Waves&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:waterwaves.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Sound Waves&#039;&#039;  &lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:loudspeaker-waveform.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electromagnetic Waves&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic waves do not require a medium (matter) to travel through - they can travel through space.&lt;br /&gt;
Examples are radio waves, visible light, x-rays.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;X-RAYS&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:x-rays.jpeg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Radio Waves&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:facts-about-radio-waves.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Visible Lights&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:visible-spectrum123.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==A Mathematical Model==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The position of the particle is defined by a sine wave:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;y = ymaxsin(wt)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where w is the angular frequency&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Amplitude&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Amplitude is the distance from the maximum vertical displacement of the wave to the middle of the wave. The Amplitude of the sinusoidal Wave is the height of the peak in the wave measured from the zero line. This measures the magnitude of oscillation of a particular wave. The Amplitude is important because it tells you the intensity or brightness of a wave in comparison with other waves.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Period&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The period of the wave is the time between crests in seconds(s).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
T = 2pi/w-----(units of seconds)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Frequency&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Frequency is the number of cycles per second, and is expressed as sec-1 or Hertz(Hz). Frequency is directly proportional to energy and can be express as &amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039; E = hv &#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
where E is energy, h is Planck&#039;s constant ( 6.62607*10^-34J) and v is frequency&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
f = 1/T&lt;br /&gt;
f = w/2pi----(Units Hertz)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Wavelength&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wavelength is the distance between crests in meters. Wavelength is equal to the speed of light times frequency. Longer wavelength waves such as radio waves carry low energy; this is why we can listen to the radio without any harmful consequences. Shorter wavelength waves such as x-rays carry higher energy that can be hazardous to our health. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:shortlongwavelength.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Wavelength and Frequency&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The speed of light is the multiplication of the wavelength and frequency. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;c=λν &#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:visible_EM_modes.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This diagram shows all properties of waves:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:wave_props.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;ENERGY FLUX&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is defined by the following equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         S = (1/u0)*(E x B) in W/m^2&lt;br /&gt;
         where B = E/c&lt;br /&gt;
         where c = speed of light&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:energy_flux.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness: X-Rays==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic Radiation while commonly thought of as only including visible light, radio waves, UV waves, and gamma rays; also include X-rays. In 1895, X-rays were initially discovered by William Roentgen, who accidentally fell upon the most important discovery about his life (Figure 1). Roentgen was already working on cathode rays, and because of a fluorescent glow that occurred during his experiments, covered his experimental apparatus with heavy black paper. However, when he did this, he discovered a glow coming from a screen several feet away. Through many more experiments, he discovered that a new type of energy, not cathode rays, were the cause of the glow. He named them “x-rays” and received the 1901 Nobel Prize in Physics. Roentgen never patented his monumental discovery and as a result, numerous researchers set out to find a multitude of uses and capitalize on his work.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Primarily, people could now view objects that were hidden from plain view (i.e. scanners in airports). While X-rays are now used in 100’s of professions (security, chemistry, art galleries), its most important function is to view bones to determine abnormalities in humans. In fact, one of Roentgen’s first x-rays was of his wife’s hand (Figure 2). X-rays fall under the scope of electromagnetic radiation because, like all E.R. waves, it is comprised of photons. X-rays have wavelengths between 0.01 to 10 nanometers and fall between UV and Gamma Waves on the E.R. spectrum (Figure 3).&lt;br /&gt;
There are two main methods in which an x-ray may be formed. Both require a vacuum-filled tube called an x-ray tube (Figure 4). With an anode on one end and a cathode on the other, an electric current is applied and a high energy electron is projected from the cathode, through the vacuum, and at the anode. In the characteristic x-ray generation approach, the electron from the cathode  collides with an inner shell electron on an atom on the anode (Figure 5). Both of these electrons are ejected from the atom and an outer shell electron takes the place of the inner shell one. Because the outer electron must have a lower energy to fill the inner shell hole, it releases a photon with the equivalent energy of the difference between the two energy levels in the atom. This photon is the x-ray that is used to view objects such as bones.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the Bremsstrahlung x-ray generation method, the electron from the cathode is slowed as it passes the nucleus of an atom at the anode (Figure 6). As it slows and its path is changed, the loses energy (kinetic energy). This energy is also released as a photon which is subsequently called an x-ray. &lt;br /&gt;
Depending on the voltage and current of the tube and the material of the anode, different types (as in wavelengths and energy) of x-rays can be produced and each one. However, all X-rays will continue to pass through objects until it reaches a material dense that stops it. However, density of the material required depends on the energy of the x-ray. For example, during a medical x-ray, x-rays of a certain energy will pass through soft tissue (skin, organs, etc) but not through bones. The x-rays that pass through the soft tissue will strike the screen and the absence of the x-rays absorbed by the bones will cause a negative space on the screen. The areas where x-rays do not strike will form the image of the bone. While the principles remain the same, x-ray machines today use incredible sophisticated technology to specify the type of x-ray they want and have greatly increased in accuracy since Roentgen’s initial discovery.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_1.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 2:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_2.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 3:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_3.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 4:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_4.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 5:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_5.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 6:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_6.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Information and photographs are pulled from references 1 through 5 cited below*&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Already, during the Ancient Greek and Roman times, light was studied as the presence of deflection and refraction were noticed. &lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic radiation of wavelengths in the early 19th century. The discovery of infrared radiation is ascribed to astronomer William Herschel, who published his results in 1800 before the Royal Society of London. Herschel used a glass Triangular prism (optics)|prism to refract light from the Sun and detected invisible rays that caused heating beyond the red part of the spectrum, through an increase in the temperature recorded with a thermometer. These &amp;quot;calorific rays&amp;quot; were later termed infrared.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1801, Rohann Ritter, discovered the presence of ultraviolet light using salts. It was known that light could darken some silver halides and while doing so, he realized that the region beyond the violet bar (therefore ultraviolet) was more effective in changing the color of the halides. &lt;br /&gt;
However,in 1864, while summarizing the theories of his time accumulating into his famous set of Maxwell equations, James Clerk Maxwell managed to deduce the speed of light being around 3e8 meters per second. This was instrumental in creating the rest of the spectrum. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1887-1888 Physicist Heinrich Hertz not only tried to measure the velocity and frequency of electromagnetic radiation waves at other parts of the known spectrum of the time, but he was also able to prove that Maxwell&#039;s findings were correct. He did this on the microwave radiation as well. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The discovery of X-rays occurred in 1895 by Wilhelm Rontgen when his barium platinocyanide detector screen began to glow under the presence of a discharge that passed through a cathode ray tube although the latter was completely covered. Once he determined its possible use, he tried to look at his wife&#039;s hand using this new discovery. However x-ray spectroscopy was not institutionalized until later by Karl Manne Siegbahn. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1900, Paul Villard discovered Gamma rays although he initially thought that they were particles similar to alpha and beta particles which were emitted during radiation. These &#039;particles&#039; were later proven to be part of the electromagnetic spectrum. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
1. Elert, Glenn. &amp;quot;X-rays.&amp;quot; X-rays – The Physics Hypertextbook. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Apr. 2017. &lt;br /&gt;
http://physics.info/x-ray/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.&amp;quot;X-rays.&amp;quot; X-rays. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Apr. 2017. http://www.physics.isu.edu/radinf/xray.htm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. &amp;quot;Basics of X-ray PhysicsX-ray production.&amp;quot; Welcome to Radiology Masterclass. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Apr. 2017. http://www.radiologymasterclass.co.uk/tutorials/physics/x-ray_physics_production#top_2nd_img&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. &amp;quot;X-Rays.&amp;quot; Image: Electromagnetic Spectrum. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Apr. 2017. https://www.boundless.com/physics/textbooks/boundless-physics-textbook/electromagnetic-waves-23/the-electromagnetic-spectrum-165/x-rays-597-11175/images/electromagnetic-spectrum/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. &amp;quot;This Month in Physics History.&amp;quot; American Physical Society. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Apr. 2017. https://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/200111/history.cfm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. Editors, Spectroscopy. “The Electromagnetic Spectrum: A History.” Spectroscopy Home, 27 Oct. 2017, www.spectroscopyonline.com/electromagnetic-spectrum-history?id=&amp;amp;sk=&amp;amp;date=&amp;amp;&amp;amp;pageID=4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7. Chabay, Ruth W., and Bruce A. Sherwood. Matter &amp;amp; Interaction II: Electric &amp;amp; Magnetic Interactions, Version 1.2. John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons, 2003.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Samigues3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electromagnetic_Radiation&amp;diff=29508</id>
		<title>Electromagnetic Radiation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electromagnetic_Radiation&amp;diff=29508"/>
		<updated>2017-11-25T15:16:13Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Samigues3: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Claimed by Carlos Fernandez to edit (Spring 2016) &#039;&#039;&#039;Claimed by Sungyoung Joo(FALL 2016)&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;quot;&#039;Claimed by Monali Shah to edit (Spring 2017)&lt;br /&gt;
Claimed by Solange Amigues to edite (Fall 2017)&lt;br /&gt;
==Electromagnetic Radiation==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===What is a Electromagnetic(EM) Radiation?===&lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic radiation is a form of energy that is all around us and takes many forms, such as radio waves, microwaves, infrared, visible light, ultraviolet, x-rays, and gamma rays. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before 1873, electricity and magnetism were thought to be two different forces. However, in 1873, Scottish Physicist James Maxwell developed his famous theory of electromagnetism. There are four main electro magnetic interactions according to Maxwell:&lt;br /&gt;
* The force of attraction or repulsion between electric charges is inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them&lt;br /&gt;
* Magnetic poles come in pairs that attract and repel each other much as electric charges do&lt;br /&gt;
* An electric current in a wire produces a magnetic field whose direction depends on the direction of the current&lt;br /&gt;
* A moving electric field produces a magnetic field, and vice versa&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The four Maxwell&#039;s Equations provide a complete description of possible spatial patterns of electric and magnetic field in space. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Ampere-Maxwell Law]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gauss&#039;s Law]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Faraday&#039;s Law]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other than Maxwell&#039;s Four equations, there are general properties of all electromagnetic radiation:&lt;br /&gt;
* Electromagnetic radiation can travel through empty space. Most other types of waves must travel through some sort of substance. For example, sound waves need either a gas, solid, or liquid to pass through in order to be heard&lt;br /&gt;
* The speed of light is always a constant (3 x 10^8 m/s)&lt;br /&gt;
* Wavelengths are measured between the distances of either crests or troughs. It is usually characterized by the Greek symbol λ (gamma).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic waves are the self-propagating, mutual oscillation of electric and magnetic fields. The propagation of electromagnetic energy is often referred to as radiation. We can also say that the &#039;pulse&#039; of these moving fields result in radiation (7).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The equation for propagation is E=cB with c being the speed of light. This equation is derived from combining the two equations E=vB and B=u0e0vE, proving that v is equal to 3e8 meters/second. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To go about solving/analyzing mathematically an electromagnetic field using Maxwell&#039;s equations,this is how we proceed (7)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Establish the space and time in which the electric and magnetic fields are present&lt;br /&gt;
*Check that Maxwell&#039;s equations can be applied in the situation above&lt;br /&gt;
*Check when the charge accelerates, it produces these fields and therefore radiation&lt;br /&gt;
*Show how these fields would interact with matter&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The equation of the Radiative Electric Field is:&lt;br /&gt;
E= 1/(4πe0)*-qa/(c^2r) where a is the acceleration of the particle, c is the speed of light and r is the distance from the original location of the charge to right before the kink. This kink happens on the electric field because of the slight delay when the charge is moved. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The EM Spectrum==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
EM spectrum is a span of enormous range of wavelengths and frequencies. The EM spectrum is generally divided into 7 different regions, in order of decreasing wavelength and increasing energy and frequency. It ranges from Gamma rays to Long Radio Waves. Following are the lists of waves:&lt;br /&gt;
* Gamma rays&lt;br /&gt;
* X-rays&lt;br /&gt;
* UV rays&lt;br /&gt;
* Visible Light&lt;br /&gt;
* Infrared Rays&lt;br /&gt;
* Microwave&lt;br /&gt;
* Radio, TV&lt;br /&gt;
* Long radio waves&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:em-spectrum.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although all these waves do different things, there is one thing in common : They all travel in waves.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:spectrum_Properties.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Infrared radiation&#039;&#039;&#039; can be released as heat or thermal energy. It can also be bounced back, which is called near infrared because of its similarities with visible light energy. Infrared Radiation is most commonly used in remote sensing as infrared sensors collect thermal energy, providing us with weather conditions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:pic_snap_girl.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Visible Light&#039;&#039;&#039; is the only part of the electromagnetic spectrum that humans can see with a naked eye. This part of the spectrum includes a range of different colors that all represent a particular wavelength. Rainbows are formed in this way; light passes through matter in which it is absorbed or reflected based on its wavelength. As a result, some colors are reflected more than other, leading to the creation of a rainbow.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:pyramid123.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:rainbow.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Waves and Fields==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As we learned in class, electric field is produced when an electron is accelerating. Likewise, EM radiation is created when an atomic particle, like an electron, is accelerated by an electric field. The movement like this produces oscillating electric and magnetic fields, which travel at right angles to each other in a bundle of light energy called a photon. Photons travel in a harmonic wave at the fastest speed possible in the universe. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:waves image.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic waves are formed when an electric field couples with a magnetic field. Magnetic and electric fields of an electromagnetic wave are perpendicular to each other and to the direction of the wave. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A wavelength (in m) is the distance between two consecutive peaks of a wave. Frequency is the number of waves that form in a given length of time. A wavelength and frequency are interrelated. A short wavelength indicates that the frequency will be higher because one cycle can pass in a shorter amount of time. Likewise, a longer wavelength has a lower frequency because each cycle takes longer to complete.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:waves_1.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Waves can be classified according to their nature:&lt;br /&gt;
* Mechanical waves&lt;br /&gt;
* Electromagnetic waves&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Mechanical Waves&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mechanical waves require a medium (matter) to travel through. &lt;br /&gt;
Examples are sound waves, water waves, ripples in strings or springs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Water Waves&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:waterwaves.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Sound Waves&#039;&#039;  &lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:loudspeaker-waveform.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electromagnetic Waves&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic waves do not require a medium (matter) to travel through - they can travel through space.&lt;br /&gt;
Examples are radio waves, visible light, x-rays.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;X-RAYS&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:x-rays.jpeg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Radio Waves&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:facts-about-radio-waves.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Visible Lights&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:visible-spectrum123.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==A Mathematical Model==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The position of the particle is defined by a sine wave:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;y = ymaxsin(wt)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where w is the angular frequency&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Amplitude&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Amplitude is the distance from the maximum vertical displacement of the wave to the middle of the wave. The Amplitude of the sinusoidal Wave is the height of the peak in the wave measured from the zero line. This measures the magnitude of oscillation of a particular wave. The Amplitude is important because it tells you the intensity or brightness of a wave in comparison with other waves.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Period&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The period of the wave is the time between crests in seconds(s).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
T = 2pi/w-----(units of seconds)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Frequency&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Frequency is the number of cycles per second, and is expressed as sec-1 or Hertz(Hz). Frequency is directly proportional to energy and can be express as &amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039; E = hv &#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
where E is energy, h is Planck&#039;s constant ( 6.62607*10^-34J) and v is frequency&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
f = 1/T&lt;br /&gt;
f = w/2pi----(Units Hertz)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Wavelength&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wavelength is the distance between crests in meters. Wavelength is equal to the speed of light times frequency. Longer wavelength waves such as radio waves carry low energy; this is why we can listen to the radio without any harmful consequences. Shorter wavelength waves such as x-rays carry higher energy that can be hazardous to our health. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:shortlongwavelength.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Wavelength and Frequency&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The speed of light is the multiplication of the wavelength and frequency. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;c=λν &#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:visible_EM_modes.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This diagram shows all properties of waves:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:wave_props.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;ENERGY FLUX&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is defined by the following equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         S = (1/u0)*(E x B) in W/m^2&lt;br /&gt;
         where B = E/c&lt;br /&gt;
         where c = speed of light&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:energy_flux.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness: X-Rays==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic Radiation while commonly thought of as only including visible light, radio waves, UV waves, and gamma rays; also include X-rays. In 1895, X-rays were initially discovered by William Roentgen, who accidentally fell upon the most important discovery about his life (Figure 1). Roentgen was already working on cathode rays, and because of a fluorescent glow that occurred during his experiments, covered his experimental apparatus with heavy black paper. However, when he did this, he discovered a glow coming from a screen several feet away. Through many more experiments, he discovered that a new type of energy, not cathode rays, were the cause of the glow. He named them “x-rays” and received the 1901 Nobel Prize in Physics. Roentgen never patented his monumental discovery and as a result, numerous researchers set out to find a multitude of uses and capitalize on his work.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Primarily, people could now view objects that were hidden from plain view (i.e. scanners in airports). While X-rays are now used in 100’s of professions (security, chemistry, art galleries), its most important function is to view bones to determine abnormalities in humans. In fact, one of Roentgen’s first x-rays was of his wife’s hand (Figure 2). X-rays fall under the scope of electromagnetic radiation because, like all E.R. waves, it is comprised of photons. X-rays have wavelengths between 0.01 to 10 nanometers and fall between UV and Gamma Waves on the E.R. spectrum (Figure 3).&lt;br /&gt;
There are two main methods in which an x-ray may be formed. Both require a vacuum-filled tube called an x-ray tube (Figure 4). With an anode on one end and a cathode on the other, an electric current is applied and a high energy electron is projected from the cathode, through the vacuum, and at the anode. In the characteristic x-ray generation approach, the electron from the cathode  collides with an inner shell electron on an atom on the anode (Figure 5). Both of these electrons are ejected from the atom and an outer shell electron takes the place of the inner shell one. Because the outer electron must have a lower energy to fill the inner shell hole, it releases a photon with the equivalent energy of the difference between the two energy levels in the atom. This photon is the x-ray that is used to view objects such as bones.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the Bremsstrahlung x-ray generation method, the electron from the cathode is slowed as it passes the nucleus of an atom at the anode (Figure 6). As it slows and its path is changed, the loses energy (kinetic energy). This energy is also released as a photon which is subsequently called an x-ray. &lt;br /&gt;
Depending on the voltage and current of the tube and the material of the anode, different types (as in wavelengths and energy) of x-rays can be produced and each one. However, all X-rays will continue to pass through objects until it reaches a material dense that stops it. However, density of the material required depends on the energy of the x-ray. For example, during a medical x-ray, x-rays of a certain energy will pass through soft tissue (skin, organs, etc) but not through bones. The x-rays that pass through the soft tissue will strike the screen and the absence of the x-rays absorbed by the bones will cause a negative space on the screen. The areas where x-rays do not strike will form the image of the bone. While the principles remain the same, x-ray machines today use incredible sophisticated technology to specify the type of x-ray they want and have greatly increased in accuracy since Roentgen’s initial discovery.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_1.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 2:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_2.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 3:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_3.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 4:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_4.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 5:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_5.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 6:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_6.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Information and photographs are pulled from references 1 through 5 cited below*&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Already, during the Ancient Greek and Roman times, light was studied as the presence of deflection and refraction were noticed. &lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic radiation of wavelengths in the early 19th century. The discovery of infrared radiation is ascribed to astronomer William Herschel, who published his results in 1800 before the Royal Society of London. Herschel used a glass Triangular prism (optics)|prism to refract light from the Sun and detected invisible rays that caused heating beyond the red part of the spectrum, through an increase in the temperature recorded with a thermometer. These &amp;quot;calorific rays&amp;quot; were later termed infrared.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1801, Rohann Ritter, discovered the presence of ultraviolet light using salts. It was known that light could darken some silver halides and while doing so, he realized that the region beyond the violet bar (therefore ultraviolet) was more effective in changing the color of the halides. &lt;br /&gt;
However,in 1864, while summarizing the theories of his time accumulating into his famous set of Maxwell equations, James Clerk Maxwell managed to deduce the speed of light being around 3e8 meters per second. This was instrumental in creating the rest of the spectrum. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1887-1888 Physicist Heinrich Hertz not only tried to measure the velocity and frequency of electromagnetic radiation waves at other parts of the known spectrum of the time, but he was also able to prove that Maxwell&#039;s findings were correct. He did this on the microwave radiation as well. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The discovery of X-rays occurred in 1895 by Wilhelm Rontgen when his barium platinocyanide detector screen began to glow under the presence of a discharge that passed through a cathode ray tube although the latter was completely covered. Once he determined its possible use, he tried to look at his wife&#039;s hand using this new discovery. However x-ray spectroscopy was not institutionalized until later by Karl Manne Siegbahn. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1900, Paul Villard discovered Gamma rays although he initially thought that they were particles similar to alpha and beta particles which were emitted during radiation. These &#039;particles&#039; were later proven to be part of the electromagnetic spectrum. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
1. Elert, Glenn. &amp;quot;X-rays.&amp;quot; X-rays – The Physics Hypertextbook. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Apr. 2017. &lt;br /&gt;
http://physics.info/x-ray/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.&amp;quot;X-rays.&amp;quot; X-rays. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Apr. 2017. http://www.physics.isu.edu/radinf/xray.htm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. &amp;quot;Basics of X-ray PhysicsX-ray production.&amp;quot; Welcome to Radiology Masterclass. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Apr. 2017. http://www.radiologymasterclass.co.uk/tutorials/physics/x-ray_physics_production#top_2nd_img&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. &amp;quot;X-Rays.&amp;quot; Image: Electromagnetic Spectrum. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Apr. 2017. https://www.boundless.com/physics/textbooks/boundless-physics-textbook/electromagnetic-waves-23/the-electromagnetic-spectrum-165/x-rays-597-11175/images/electromagnetic-spectrum/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. &amp;quot;This Month in Physics History.&amp;quot; American Physical Society. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Apr. 2017. https://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/200111/history.cfm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. Editors, Spectroscopy. “The Electromagnetic Spectrum: A History.” Spectroscopy Home, 27 Oct. 2017, www.spectroscopyonline.com/electromagnetic-spectrum-history?id=&amp;amp;sk=&amp;amp;date=&amp;amp;&amp;amp;pageID=4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7. Chabay, Ruth W., and Bruce A. Sherwood. Matter &amp;amp; Interaction II: Electric &amp;amp; Magnetic Interactions, Version 1.2. John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons, 2003.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Samigues3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electromagnetic_Radiation&amp;diff=29507</id>
		<title>Electromagnetic Radiation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electromagnetic_Radiation&amp;diff=29507"/>
		<updated>2017-11-25T15:13:31Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Samigues3: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Claimed by Carlos Fernandez to edit (Spring 2016) &#039;&#039;&#039;Claimed by Sungyoung Joo(FALL 2016)&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;quot;&#039;Claimed by Monali Shah to edit (Spring 2017)&lt;br /&gt;
Claimed by Solange Amigues to edite (Fall 2017)&lt;br /&gt;
==Electromagnetic Radiation==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===What is a Electromagnetic(EM) Radiation?===&lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic radiation is a form of energy that is all around us and takes many forms, such as radio waves, microwaves, infrared, visible light, ultraviolet, x-rays, and gamma rays. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before 1873, electricity and magnetism were thought to be two different forces. However, in 1873, Scottish Physicist James Maxwell developed his famous theory of electromagnetism. There are four main electro magnetic interactions according to Maxwell:&lt;br /&gt;
* The force of attraction or repulsion between electric charges is inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them&lt;br /&gt;
* Magnetic poles come in pairs that attract and repel each other much as electric charges do&lt;br /&gt;
* An electric current in a wire produces a magnetic field whose direction depends on the direction of the current&lt;br /&gt;
* A moving electric field produces a magnetic field, and vice versa&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The four Maxwell&#039;s Equations provide a complete description of possible spatial patterns of electric and magnetic field in space. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Ampere-Maxwell Law]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gauss&#039;s Law]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Faraday&#039;s Law]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other than Maxwell&#039;s Four equations, there are general properties of all electromagnetic radiation:&lt;br /&gt;
* Electromagnetic radiation can travel through empty space. Most other types of waves must travel through some sort of substance. For example, sound waves need either a gas, solid, or liquid to pass through in order to be heard&lt;br /&gt;
* The speed of light is always a constant (3 x 10^8 m/s)&lt;br /&gt;
* Wavelengths are measured between the distances of either crests or troughs. It is usually characterized by the Greek symbol λ (gamma).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic waves are the self-propagating, mutual oscillation of electric and magnetic fields. The propagation of electromagnetic energy is often referred to as radiation. We can also say that the &#039;pulse&#039; of these moving fields result in radiation (7).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The equation for propagation is E=cB with c being the speed of light. This equation is derived from combining the two equations E=vB and B=u0e0vE, proving that v is equal to 3e8 meters/second. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To go about solving/analyzing mathematically an electromagnetic field using Maxwell&#039;s equations,this is how we proceed (7)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Establish the space and time in which the electric and magnetic fields are present&lt;br /&gt;
*Check that Maxwell&#039;s equations can be applied in the situation above&lt;br /&gt;
*Check when the charge accelerates, it produces these fields and therefore radiation&lt;br /&gt;
*Show how these fields would interact with matter&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The equation of the Radiative Electric Field is:&lt;br /&gt;
E= 1/(4πe0)*-qa/(c^2r) where a is the acceleration of the particle, c is the speed of light and r is the distance from the original location of the charge to right before the kink. This kink happens on the electric field because of the slight delay when the charge is moved. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The EM Spectrum==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
EM spectrum is a span of enormous range of wavelengths and frequencies. The EM spectrum is generally divided into 7 different regions, in order of decreasing wavelength and increasing energy and frequency. It ranges from Gamma rays to Long Radio Waves. Following are the lists of waves:&lt;br /&gt;
* Gamma rays&lt;br /&gt;
* X-rays&lt;br /&gt;
* UV rays&lt;br /&gt;
* Visible Light&lt;br /&gt;
* Infrared Rays&lt;br /&gt;
* Microwave&lt;br /&gt;
* Radio, TV&lt;br /&gt;
* Long radio waves&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:em-spectrum.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although all these waves do different things, there is one thing in common : They all travel in waves.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:spectrum_Properties.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Infrared radiation&#039;&#039;&#039; can be released as heat or thermal energy. It can also be bounced back, which is called near infrared because of its similarities with visible light energy. Infrared Radiation is most commonly used in remote sensing as infrared sensors collect thermal energy, providing us with weather conditions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:pic_snap_girl.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Visible Light&#039;&#039;&#039; is the only part of the electromagnetic spectrum that humans can see with a naked eye. This part of the spectrum includes a range of different colors that all represent a particular wavelength. Rainbows are formed in this way; light passes through matter in which it is absorbed or reflected based on its wavelength. As a result, some colors are reflected more than other, leading to the creation of a rainbow.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:pyramid123.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:rainbow.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Waves and Fields==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As we learned in class, electric field is produced when an electron is accelerating. Likewise, EM radiation is created when an atomic particle, like an electron, is accelerated by an electric field. The movement like this produces oscillating electric and magnetic fields, which travel at right angles to each other in a bundle of light energy called a photon. Photons travel in a harmonic wave at the fastest speed possible in the universe. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:waves image.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic waves are formed when an electric field couples with a magnetic field. Magnetic and electric fields of an electromagnetic wave are perpendicular to each other and to the direction of the wave. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A wavelength (in m) is the distance between two consecutive peaks of a wave. Frequency is the number of waves that form in a given length of time. A wavelength and frequency are interrelated. A short wavelength indicates that the frequency will be higher because one cycle can pass in a shorter amount of time. Likewise, a longer wavelength has a lower frequency because each cycle takes longer to complete.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:waves_1.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Waves can be classified according to their nature:&lt;br /&gt;
* Mechanical waves&lt;br /&gt;
* Electromagnetic waves&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Mechanical Waves&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mechanical waves require a medium (matter) to travel through. &lt;br /&gt;
Examples are sound waves, water waves, ripples in strings or springs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Water Waves&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:waterwaves.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Sound Waves&#039;&#039;  &lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:loudspeaker-waveform.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electromagnetic Waves&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic waves do not require a medium (matter) to travel through - they can travel through space.&lt;br /&gt;
Examples are radio waves, visible light, x-rays.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;X-RAYS&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:x-rays.jpeg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Radio Waves&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:facts-about-radio-waves.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Visible Lights&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:visible-spectrum123.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==A Mathematical Model==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The position of the particle is defined by a sine wave:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;y = ymaxsin(wt)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
         Where w is the angular frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Amplitude&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Amplitude is the distance from the maximum vertical displacement of the wave to the middle of the wave. The Amplitude of the sinusoidal Wave is the height of the peak in the wave measured from the zero line. This measures the magnitude of oscillation of a particular wave. The Amplitude is important because it tells you the intensity or brightness of a wave in comparison with other waves.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Period&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The period of the wave is the time between crests in seconds(s).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
T = 2pi/w-----(units of seconds)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Frequency&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Frequency is the number of cycles per second, and is expressed as sec-1 or Hertz(Hz). Frequency is directly proportional to energy and can be express as &amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039; E = hv &#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
where E is energy, h is Planck&#039;s constant ( 6.62607*10^-34J) and v is frequency&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
f = 1/T&lt;br /&gt;
f = w/2pi----(Units Hertz)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Wavelength&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wavelength is the distance between crests in meters. Wavelength is equal to the speed of light times frequency. Longer wavelength waves such as radio waves carry low energy; this is why we can listen to the radio without any harmful consequences. Shorter wavelength waves such as x-rays carry higher energy that can be hazardous to our health. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:shortlongwavelength.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Wavelength and Frequency&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The speed of light is the multiplication of the wavelength and frequency. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;c=λν &#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:visible_EM_modes.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This diagram shows all properties of waves:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:wave_props.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;ENERGY FLUX&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is defined by the following equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         S = (1/u0)*(E x B) in W/m^2&lt;br /&gt;
         where B = E/c&lt;br /&gt;
         where c = speed of light&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:energy_flux.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness: X-Rays==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic Radiation while commonly thought of as only including visible light, radio waves, UV waves, and gamma rays; also include X-rays. In 1895, X-rays were initially discovered by William Roentgen, who accidentally fell upon the most important discovery about his life (Figure 1). Roentgen was already working on cathode rays, and because of a fluorescent glow that occurred during his experiments, covered his experimental apparatus with heavy black paper. However, when he did this, he discovered a glow coming from a screen several feet away. Through many more experiments, he discovered that a new type of energy, not cathode rays, were the cause of the glow. He named them “x-rays” and received the 1901 Nobel Prize in Physics. Roentgen never patented his monumental discovery and as a result, numerous researchers set out to find a multitude of uses and capitalize on his work.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Primarily, people could now view objects that were hidden from plain view (i.e. scanners in airports). While X-rays are now used in 100’s of professions (security, chemistry, art galleries), its most important function is to view bones to determine abnormalities in humans. In fact, one of Roentgen’s first x-rays was of his wife’s hand (Figure 2). X-rays fall under the scope of electromagnetic radiation because, like all E.R. waves, it is comprised of photons. X-rays have wavelengths between 0.01 to 10 nanometers and fall between UV and Gamma Waves on the E.R. spectrum (Figure 3).&lt;br /&gt;
There are two main methods in which an x-ray may be formed. Both require a vacuum-filled tube called an x-ray tube (Figure 4). With an anode on one end and a cathode on the other, an electric current is applied and a high energy electron is projected from the cathode, through the vacuum, and at the anode. In the characteristic x-ray generation approach, the electron from the cathode  collides with an inner shell electron on an atom on the anode (Figure 5). Both of these electrons are ejected from the atom and an outer shell electron takes the place of the inner shell one. Because the outer electron must have a lower energy to fill the inner shell hole, it releases a photon with the equivalent energy of the difference between the two energy levels in the atom. This photon is the x-ray that is used to view objects such as bones.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the Bremsstrahlung x-ray generation method, the electron from the cathode is slowed as it passes the nucleus of an atom at the anode (Figure 6). As it slows and its path is changed, the loses energy (kinetic energy). This energy is also released as a photon which is subsequently called an x-ray. &lt;br /&gt;
Depending on the voltage and current of the tube and the material of the anode, different types (as in wavelengths and energy) of x-rays can be produced and each one. However, all X-rays will continue to pass through objects until it reaches a material dense that stops it. However, density of the material required depends on the energy of the x-ray. For example, during a medical x-ray, x-rays of a certain energy will pass through soft tissue (skin, organs, etc) but not through bones. The x-rays that pass through the soft tissue will strike the screen and the absence of the x-rays absorbed by the bones will cause a negative space on the screen. The areas where x-rays do not strike will form the image of the bone. While the principles remain the same, x-ray machines today use incredible sophisticated technology to specify the type of x-ray they want and have greatly increased in accuracy since Roentgen’s initial discovery.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_1.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 2:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_2.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 3:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_3.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 4:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_4.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 5:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_5.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 6:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_6.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Information and photographs are pulled from references 1 through 5 cited below*&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Already, during the Ancient Greek and Roman times, light was studied as the presence of deflection and refraction were noticed. &lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic radiation of wavelengths in the early 19th century. The discovery of infrared radiation is ascribed to astronomer William Herschel, who published his results in 1800 before the Royal Society of London. Herschel used a glass Triangular prism (optics)|prism to refract light from the Sun and detected invisible rays that caused heating beyond the red part of the spectrum, through an increase in the temperature recorded with a thermometer. These &amp;quot;calorific rays&amp;quot; were later termed infrared.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1801, Rohann Ritter, discovered the presence of ultraviolet light using salts. It was known that light could darken some silver halides and while doing so, he realized that the region beyond the violet bar (therefore ultraviolet) was more effective in changing the color of the halides. &lt;br /&gt;
However,in 1864, while summarizing the theories of his time accumulating into his famous set of Maxwell equations, James Clerk Maxwell managed to deduce the speed of light being around 3e8 meters per second. This was instrumental in creating the rest of the spectrum. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1887-1888 Physicist Heinrich Hertz not only tried to measure the velocity and frequency of electromagnetic radiation waves at other parts of the known spectrum of the time, but he was also able to prove that Maxwell&#039;s findings were correct. He did this on the microwave radiation as well. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The discovery of X-rays occurred in 1895 by Wilhelm Rontgen when his barium platinocyanide detector screen began to glow under the presence of a discharge that passed through a cathode ray tube although the latter was completely covered. Once he determined its possible use, he tried to look at his wife&#039;s hand using this new discovery. However x-ray spectroscopy was not institutionalized until later by Karl Manne Siegbahn. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1900, Paul Villard discovered Gamma rays although he initially thought that they were particles similar to alpha and beta particles which were emitted during radiation. These &#039;particles&#039; were later proven to be part of the electromagnetic spectrum. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
1. Elert, Glenn. &amp;quot;X-rays.&amp;quot; X-rays – The Physics Hypertextbook. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Apr. 2017. &lt;br /&gt;
http://physics.info/x-ray/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.&amp;quot;X-rays.&amp;quot; X-rays. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Apr. 2017. http://www.physics.isu.edu/radinf/xray.htm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. &amp;quot;Basics of X-ray PhysicsX-ray production.&amp;quot; Welcome to Radiology Masterclass. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Apr. 2017. http://www.radiologymasterclass.co.uk/tutorials/physics/x-ray_physics_production#top_2nd_img&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. &amp;quot;X-Rays.&amp;quot; Image: Electromagnetic Spectrum. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Apr. 2017. https://www.boundless.com/physics/textbooks/boundless-physics-textbook/electromagnetic-waves-23/the-electromagnetic-spectrum-165/x-rays-597-11175/images/electromagnetic-spectrum/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. &amp;quot;This Month in Physics History.&amp;quot; American Physical Society. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Apr. 2017. https://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/200111/history.cfm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. Editors, Spectroscopy. “The Electromagnetic Spectrum: A History.” Spectroscopy Home, 27 Oct. 2017, www.spectroscopyonline.com/electromagnetic-spectrum-history?id=&amp;amp;sk=&amp;amp;date=&amp;amp;&amp;amp;pageID=4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7. Chabay, Ruth W., and Bruce A. Sherwood. Matter &amp;amp; Interaction II: Electric &amp;amp; Magnetic Interactions, Version 1.2. John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons, 2003.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Samigues3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electromagnetic_Radiation&amp;diff=29506</id>
		<title>Electromagnetic Radiation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electromagnetic_Radiation&amp;diff=29506"/>
		<updated>2017-11-25T14:38:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Samigues3: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Claimed by Carlos Fernandez to edit (Spring 2016) &#039;&#039;&#039;Claimed by Sungyoung Joo(FALL 2016)&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;quot;&#039;Claimed by Monali Shah to edit (Spring 2017)&lt;br /&gt;
Claimed by Solange Amigues to edite (Fall 2017)&lt;br /&gt;
==Electromagnetic Radiation==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===What is a Electromagnetic(EM) Radiation?===&lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic radiation is a form of energy that is all around us and takes many forms, such as radio waves, microwaves, infrared, visible light, ultraviolet, x-rays, and gamma rays. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before 1873, electricity and magnetism were thought to be two different forces. However, in 1873, Scottish Physicist James Maxwell developed his famous theory of electromagnetism. There are four main electro magnetic interactions according to Maxwell:&lt;br /&gt;
* The force of attraction or repulsion between electric charges is inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them&lt;br /&gt;
* Magnetic poles come in pairs that attract and repel each other much as electric charges do&lt;br /&gt;
* An electric current in a wire produces a magnetic field whose direction depends on the direction of the current&lt;br /&gt;
* A moving electric field produces a magnetic field, and vice versa&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The four Maxwell&#039;s Equations provide a complete description of possible spatial patterns of electric and magnetic field in space. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Ampere-Maxwell Law]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gauss&#039;s Law]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Faraday&#039;s Law]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other than Maxwell&#039;s Four equations, there are general properties of all electromagnetic radiation:&lt;br /&gt;
* Electromagnetic radiation can travel through empty space. Most other types of waves must travel through some sort of substance. For example, sound waves need either a gas, solid, or liquid to pass through in order to be heard&lt;br /&gt;
* The speed of light is always a constant (3 x 10^8 m/s)&lt;br /&gt;
* Wavelengths are measured between the distances of either crests or troughs. It is usually characterized by the Greek symbol λ (gamma).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic waves are the self-propagating, mutual oscillation of electric and magnetic fields. The propagation of electromagnetic energy is often referred to as radiation. We can also say that the &#039;pulse&#039; of these moving fields result in radiation (7).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The equation for propagation is E=cB with c being the speed of light. This equation is derived from combining the two equations E=vB and B=u0e0vE, proving that v is equal to 3e8 meters/second. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To go about solving/analyzing mathematically an electromagnetic field using Maxwell&#039;s equations,this is how we proceed (7)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Establish the space and time in which the electric and magnetic fields are present&lt;br /&gt;
*Check that Maxwell&#039;s equations can be applied in the situation above&lt;br /&gt;
*Check when the charge accelerates, it produces these fields and therefore radiation&lt;br /&gt;
*Show how these fields would interact with matter&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The EM Spectrum==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
EM spectrum is a span of enormous range of wavelengths and frequencies. The EM spectrum is generally divided into 7 different regions, in order of decreasing wavelength and increasing energy and frequency. It ranges from Gamma rays to Long Radio Waves. Following are the lists of waves:&lt;br /&gt;
* Gamma rays&lt;br /&gt;
* X-rays&lt;br /&gt;
* UV rays&lt;br /&gt;
* Visible Light&lt;br /&gt;
* Infrared Rays&lt;br /&gt;
* Microwave&lt;br /&gt;
* Radio, TV&lt;br /&gt;
* Long radio waves&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:em-spectrum.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although all these waves do different things, there is one thing in common : They all travel in waves.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:spectrum_Properties.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Infrared radiation&#039;&#039;&#039; can be released as heat or thermal energy. It can also be bounced back, which is called near infrared because of its similarities with visible light energy. Infrared Radiation is most commonly used in remote sensing as infrared sensors collect thermal energy, providing us with weather conditions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:pic_snap_girl.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Visible Light&#039;&#039;&#039; is the only part of the electromagnetic spectrum that humans can see with a naked eye. This part of the spectrum includes a range of different colors that all represent a particular wavelength. Rainbows are formed in this way; light passes through matter in which it is absorbed or reflected based on its wavelength. As a result, some colors are reflected more than other, leading to the creation of a rainbow.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:pyramid123.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:rainbow.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Waves and Fields==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As we learned in class, electric field is produced when an electron is accelerating. Likewise, EM radiation is created when an atomic particle, like an electron, is accelerated by an electric field. The movement like this produces oscillating electric and magnetic fields, which travel at right angles to each other in a bundle of light energy called a photon. Photons travel in a harmonic wave at the fastest speed possible in the universe. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:waves image.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic waves are formed when an electric field couples with a magnetic field. Magnetic and electric fields of an electromagnetic wave are perpendicular to each other and to the direction of the wave. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A wavelength (in m) is the distance between two consecutive peaks of a wave. Frequency is the number of waves that form in a given length of time. A wavelength and frequency are interrelated. A short wavelength indicates that the frequency will be higher because one cycle can pass in a shorter amount of time. Likewise, a longer wavelength has a lower frequency because each cycle takes longer to complete.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:waves_1.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Waves can be classified according to their nature:&lt;br /&gt;
* Mechanical waves&lt;br /&gt;
* Electromagnetic waves&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Mechanical Waves&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mechanical waves require a medium (matter) to travel through. &lt;br /&gt;
Examples are sound waves, water waves, ripples in strings or springs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Water Waves&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:waterwaves.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Sound Waves&#039;&#039;  &lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:loudspeaker-waveform.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electromagnetic Waves&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic waves do not require a medium (matter) to travel through - they can travel through space.&lt;br /&gt;
Examples are radio waves, visible light, x-rays.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;X-RAYS&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:x-rays.jpeg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Radio Waves&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:facts-about-radio-waves.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Visible Lights&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:visible-spectrum123.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==A Mathematical Model==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The position of the particle is defined by a sine wave:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;y = ymaxsin(wt)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
         Where w is the angular frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Amplitude&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Amplitude is the distance from the maximum vertical displacement of the wave to the middle of the wave. The Amplitude of the sinusoidal Wave is the height of the peak in the wave measured from the zero line. This measures the magnitude of oscillation of a particular wave. The Amplitude is important because it tells you the intensity or brightness of a wave in comparison with other waves.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Period&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The period of the wave is the time between crests in seconds(s).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
T = 2pi/w-----(units of seconds)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Frequency&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Frequency is the number of cycles per second, and is expressed as sec-1 or Hertz(Hz). Frequency is directly proportional to energy and can be express as &amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039; E = hv &#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
where E is energy, h is Planck&#039;s constant ( 6.62607*10^-34J) and v is frequency&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
f = 1/T&lt;br /&gt;
f = w/2pi----(Units Hertz)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Wavelength&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wavelength is the distance between crests in meters. Wavelength is equal to the speed of light times frequency. Longer wavelength waves such as radio waves carry low energy; this is why we can listen to the radio without any harmful consequences. Shorter wavelength waves such as x-rays carry higher energy that can be hazardous to our health. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:shortlongwavelength.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Wavelength and Frequency&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The speed of light is the multiplication of the wavelength and frequency. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;c=λν &#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:visible_EM_modes.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This diagram shows all properties of waves:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:wave_props.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;ENERGY FLUX&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is defined by the following equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         S = (1/u0)*(E x B) in W/m^2&lt;br /&gt;
         where B = E/c&lt;br /&gt;
         where c = speed of light&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:energy_flux.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness: X-Rays==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic Radiation while commonly thought of as only including visible light, radio waves, UV waves, and gamma rays; also include X-rays. In 1895, X-rays were initially discovered by William Roentgen, who accidentally fell upon the most important discovery about his life (Figure 1). Roentgen was already working on cathode rays, and because of a fluorescent glow that occurred during his experiments, covered his experimental apparatus with heavy black paper. However, when he did this, he discovered a glow coming from a screen several feet away. Through many more experiments, he discovered that a new type of energy, not cathode rays, were the cause of the glow. He named them “x-rays” and received the 1901 Nobel Prize in Physics. Roentgen never patented his monumental discovery and as a result, numerous researchers set out to find a multitude of uses and capitalize on his work.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Primarily, people could now view objects that were hidden from plain view (i.e. scanners in airports). While X-rays are now used in 100’s of professions (security, chemistry, art galleries), its most important function is to view bones to determine abnormalities in humans. In fact, one of Roentgen’s first x-rays was of his wife’s hand (Figure 2). X-rays fall under the scope of electromagnetic radiation because, like all E.R. waves, it is comprised of photons. X-rays have wavelengths between 0.01 to 10 nanometers and fall between UV and Gamma Waves on the E.R. spectrum (Figure 3).&lt;br /&gt;
There are two main methods in which an x-ray may be formed. Both require a vacuum-filled tube called an x-ray tube (Figure 4). With an anode on one end and a cathode on the other, an electric current is applied and a high energy electron is projected from the cathode, through the vacuum, and at the anode. In the characteristic x-ray generation approach, the electron from the cathode  collides with an inner shell electron on an atom on the anode (Figure 5). Both of these electrons are ejected from the atom and an outer shell electron takes the place of the inner shell one. Because the outer electron must have a lower energy to fill the inner shell hole, it releases a photon with the equivalent energy of the difference between the two energy levels in the atom. This photon is the x-ray that is used to view objects such as bones.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the Bremsstrahlung x-ray generation method, the electron from the cathode is slowed as it passes the nucleus of an atom at the anode (Figure 6). As it slows and its path is changed, the loses energy (kinetic energy). This energy is also released as a photon which is subsequently called an x-ray. &lt;br /&gt;
Depending on the voltage and current of the tube and the material of the anode, different types (as in wavelengths and energy) of x-rays can be produced and each one. However, all X-rays will continue to pass through objects until it reaches a material dense that stops it. However, density of the material required depends on the energy of the x-ray. For example, during a medical x-ray, x-rays of a certain energy will pass through soft tissue (skin, organs, etc) but not through bones. The x-rays that pass through the soft tissue will strike the screen and the absence of the x-rays absorbed by the bones will cause a negative space on the screen. The areas where x-rays do not strike will form the image of the bone. While the principles remain the same, x-ray machines today use incredible sophisticated technology to specify the type of x-ray they want and have greatly increased in accuracy since Roentgen’s initial discovery.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_1.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 2:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_2.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 3:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_3.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 4:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_4.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 5:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_5.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 6:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_6.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Information and photographs are pulled from references 1 through 5 cited below*&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Already, during the Ancient Greek and Roman times, light was studied as the presence of deflection and refraction were noticed. &lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic radiation of wavelengths in the early 19th century. The discovery of infrared radiation is ascribed to astronomer William Herschel, who published his results in 1800 before the Royal Society of London. Herschel used a glass Triangular prism (optics)|prism to refract light from the Sun and detected invisible rays that caused heating beyond the red part of the spectrum, through an increase in the temperature recorded with a thermometer. These &amp;quot;calorific rays&amp;quot; were later termed infrared.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1801, Rohann Ritter, discovered the presence of ultraviolet light using salts. It was known that light could darken some silver halides and while doing so, he realized that the region beyond the violet bar (therefore ultraviolet) was more effective in changing the color of the halides. &lt;br /&gt;
However,in 1864, while summarizing the theories of his time accumulating into his famous set of Maxwell equations, James Clerk Maxwell managed to deduce the speed of light being around 3e8 meters per second. This was instrumental in creating the rest of the spectrum. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1887-1888 Physicist Heinrich Hertz not only tried to measure the velocity and frequency of electromagnetic radiation waves at other parts of the known spectrum of the time, but he was also able to prove that Maxwell&#039;s findings were correct. He did this on the microwave radiation as well. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The discovery of X-rays occurred in 1895 by Wilhelm Rontgen when his barium platinocyanide detector screen began to glow under the presence of a discharge that passed through a cathode ray tube although the latter was completely covered. Once he determined its possible use, he tried to look at his wife&#039;s hand using this new discovery. However x-ray spectroscopy was not institutionalized until later by Karl Manne Siegbahn. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1900, Paul Villard discovered Gamma rays although he initially thought that they were particles similar to alpha and beta particles which were emitted during radiation. These &#039;particles&#039; were later proven to be part of the electromagnetic spectrum. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
1. Elert, Glenn. &amp;quot;X-rays.&amp;quot; X-rays – The Physics Hypertextbook. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Apr. 2017. &lt;br /&gt;
http://physics.info/x-ray/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.&amp;quot;X-rays.&amp;quot; X-rays. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Apr. 2017. http://www.physics.isu.edu/radinf/xray.htm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. &amp;quot;Basics of X-ray PhysicsX-ray production.&amp;quot; Welcome to Radiology Masterclass. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Apr. 2017. http://www.radiologymasterclass.co.uk/tutorials/physics/x-ray_physics_production#top_2nd_img&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. &amp;quot;X-Rays.&amp;quot; Image: Electromagnetic Spectrum. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Apr. 2017. https://www.boundless.com/physics/textbooks/boundless-physics-textbook/electromagnetic-waves-23/the-electromagnetic-spectrum-165/x-rays-597-11175/images/electromagnetic-spectrum/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. &amp;quot;This Month in Physics History.&amp;quot; American Physical Society. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Apr. 2017. https://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/200111/history.cfm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. Editors, Spectroscopy. “The Electromagnetic Spectrum: A History.” Spectroscopy Home, 27 Oct. 2017, www.spectroscopyonline.com/electromagnetic-spectrum-history?id=&amp;amp;sk=&amp;amp;date=&amp;amp;&amp;amp;pageID=4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7. Chabay, Ruth W., and Bruce A. Sherwood. Matter &amp;amp; Interaction II: Electric &amp;amp; Magnetic Interactions, Version 1.2. John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons, 2003.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Samigues3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electromagnetic_Radiation&amp;diff=29505</id>
		<title>Electromagnetic Radiation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electromagnetic_Radiation&amp;diff=29505"/>
		<updated>2017-11-25T14:33:18Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Samigues3: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Claimed by Carlos Fernandez to edit (Spring 2016) &#039;&#039;&#039;Claimed by Sungyoung Joo(FALL 2016)&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;quot;&#039;Claimed by Monali Shah to edit (Spring 2017)&lt;br /&gt;
Claimed by Solange Amigues to edite (Fall 2017)&lt;br /&gt;
==Electromagnetic Radiation==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===What is a Electromagnetic(EM) Radiation?===&lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic radiation is a form of energy that is all around us and takes many forms, such as radio waves, microwaves, infrared, visible light, ultraviolet, x-rays, and gamma rays. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before 1873, electricity and magnetism were thought to be two different forces. However, in 1873, Scottish Physicist James Maxwell developed his famous theory of electromagnetism. There are four main electro magnetic interactions according to Maxwell:&lt;br /&gt;
* The force of attraction or repulsion between electric charges is inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them&lt;br /&gt;
* Magnetic poles come in pairs that attract and repel each other much as electric charges do&lt;br /&gt;
* An electric current in a wire produces a magnetic field whose direction depends on the direction of the current&lt;br /&gt;
* A moving electric field produces a magnetic field, and vice versa&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The four Maxwell&#039;s Equations provide a complete description of possible spatial patterns of electric and magnetic field in space. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Ampere-Maxwell Law]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gauss&#039;s Law]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Faraday&#039;s Law]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other than Maxwell&#039;s Four equations, there are general properties of all electromagnetic radiation:&lt;br /&gt;
* Electromagnetic radiation can travel through empty space. Most other types of waves must travel through some sort of substance. For example, sound waves need either a gas, solid, or liquid to pass through in order to be heard&lt;br /&gt;
* The speed of light is always a constant (3 x 10^8 m/s)&lt;br /&gt;
* Wavelengths are measured between the distances of either crests or troughs. It is usually characterized by the Greek symbol λ (gamma).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic waves are the self-propagating, mutual oscillation of electric and magnetic fields. The propagation of electromagnetic energy is often referred to as radiation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The equation for propagation is E=cB with c being the speed of light. This equation is derived from combining the two equations E=vB and B=u0e0vE, proving that v is equation to 3e8 meters/second. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To go about solving/analyzing mathematically an electromagnetic field using Maxwell&#039;s equations,this is how we proceed (7)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Establish the space and time in which the electric and magnetic fields are present&lt;br /&gt;
*Check that Maxwell&#039;s equations can be applied in the situation above&lt;br /&gt;
*Check when the charge accelerates, it produces these fields and therefore radiation&lt;br /&gt;
*Show how these fields would interact with matter&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The EM Spectrum==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
EM spectrum is a span of enormous range of wavelengths and frequencies. The EM spectrum is generally divided into 7 different regions, in order of decreasing wavelength and increasing energy and frequency. It ranges from Gamma rays to Long Radio Waves. Following are the lists of waves:&lt;br /&gt;
* Gamma rays&lt;br /&gt;
* X-rays&lt;br /&gt;
* UV rays&lt;br /&gt;
* Visible Light&lt;br /&gt;
* Infrared Rays&lt;br /&gt;
* Microwave&lt;br /&gt;
* Radio, TV&lt;br /&gt;
* Long radio waves&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:em-spectrum.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although all these waves do different things, there is one thing in common : They all travel in waves.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:spectrum_Properties.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Infrared radiation&#039;&#039;&#039; can be released as heat or thermal energy. It can also be bounced back, which is called near infrared because of its similarities with visible light energy. Infrared Radiation is most commonly used in remote sensing as infrared sensors collect thermal energy, providing us with weather conditions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:pic_snap_girl.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Visible Light&#039;&#039;&#039; is the only part of the electromagnetic spectrum that humans can see with a naked eye. This part of the spectrum includes a range of different colors that all represent a particular wavelength. Rainbows are formed in this way; light passes through matter in which it is absorbed or reflected based on its wavelength. As a result, some colors are reflected more than other, leading to the creation of a rainbow.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:pyramid123.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:rainbow.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Waves and Fields==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As we learned in class, electric field is produced when an electron is accelerating. Likewise, EM radiation is created when an atomic particle, like an electron, is accelerated by an electric field. The movement like this produces oscillating electric and magnetic fields, which travel at right angles to each other in a bundle of light energy called a photon. Photons travel in a harmonic wave at the fastest speed possible in the universe. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:waves image.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic waves are formed when an electric field couples with a magnetic field. Magnetic and electric fields of an electromagnetic wave are perpendicular to each other and to the direction of the wave. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A wavelength (in m) is the distance between two consecutive peaks of a wave. Frequency is the number of waves that form in a given length of time. A wavelength and frequency are interrelated. A short wavelength indicates that the frequency will be higher because one cycle can pass in a shorter amount of time. Likewise, a longer wavelength has a lower frequency because each cycle takes longer to complete.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:waves_1.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Waves can be classified according to their nature:&lt;br /&gt;
* Mechanical waves&lt;br /&gt;
* Electromagnetic waves&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Mechanical Waves&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mechanical waves require a medium (matter) to travel through. &lt;br /&gt;
Examples are sound waves, water waves, ripples in strings or springs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Water Waves&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:waterwaves.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Sound Waves&#039;&#039;  &lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:loudspeaker-waveform.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electromagnetic Waves&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic waves do not require a medium (matter) to travel through - they can travel through space.&lt;br /&gt;
Examples are radio waves, visible light, x-rays.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;X-RAYS&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:x-rays.jpeg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Radio Waves&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:facts-about-radio-waves.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Visible Lights&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:visible-spectrum123.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==A Mathematical Model==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The position of the particle is defined by a sine wave:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;y = ymaxsin(wt)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
         Where w is the angular frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Amplitude&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Amplitude is the distance from the maximum vertical displacement of the wave to the middle of the wave. The Amplitude of the sinusoidal Wave is the height of the peak in the wave measured from the zero line. This measures the magnitude of oscillation of a particular wave. The Amplitude is important because it tells you the intensity or brightness of a wave in comparison with other waves.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Period&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The period of the wave is the time between crests in seconds(s).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
T = 2pi/w-----(units of seconds)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Frequency&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Frequency is the number of cycles per second, and is expressed as sec-1 or Hertz(Hz). Frequency is directly proportional to energy and can be express as &amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039; E = hv &#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
where E is energy, h is Planck&#039;s constant ( 6.62607*10^-34J) and v is frequency&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
f = 1/T&lt;br /&gt;
f = w/2pi----(Units Hertz)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Wavelength&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wavelength is the distance between crests in meters. Wavelength is equal to the speed of light times frequency. Longer wavelength waves such as radio waves carry low energy; this is why we can listen to the radio without any harmful consequences. Shorter wavelength waves such as x-rays carry higher energy that can be hazardous to our health. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:shortlongwavelength.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Wavelength and Frequency&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The speed of light is the multiplication of the wavelength and frequency. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;c=λν &#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:visible_EM_modes.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This diagram shows all properties of waves:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:wave_props.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;ENERGY FLUX&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is defined by the following equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         S = (1/u0)*(E x B) in W/m^2&lt;br /&gt;
         where B = E/c&lt;br /&gt;
         where c = speed of light&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:energy_flux.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness: X-Rays==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic Radiation while commonly thought of as only including visible light, radio waves, UV waves, and gamma rays; also include X-rays. In 1895, X-rays were initially discovered by William Roentgen, who accidentally fell upon the most important discovery about his life (Figure 1). Roentgen was already working on cathode rays, and because of a fluorescent glow that occurred during his experiments, covered his experimental apparatus with heavy black paper. However, when he did this, he discovered a glow coming from a screen several feet away. Through many more experiments, he discovered that a new type of energy, not cathode rays, were the cause of the glow. He named them “x-rays” and received the 1901 Nobel Prize in Physics. Roentgen never patented his monumental discovery and as a result, numerous researchers set out to find a multitude of uses and capitalize on his work.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Primarily, people could now view objects that were hidden from plain view (i.e. scanners in airports). While X-rays are now used in 100’s of professions (security, chemistry, art galleries), its most important function is to view bones to determine abnormalities in humans. In fact, one of Roentgen’s first x-rays was of his wife’s hand (Figure 2). X-rays fall under the scope of electromagnetic radiation because, like all E.R. waves, it is comprised of photons. X-rays have wavelengths between 0.01 to 10 nanometers and fall between UV and Gamma Waves on the E.R. spectrum (Figure 3).&lt;br /&gt;
There are two main methods in which an x-ray may be formed. Both require a vacuum-filled tube called an x-ray tube (Figure 4). With an anode on one end and a cathode on the other, an electric current is applied and a high energy electron is projected from the cathode, through the vacuum, and at the anode. In the characteristic x-ray generation approach, the electron from the cathode  collides with an inner shell electron on an atom on the anode (Figure 5). Both of these electrons are ejected from the atom and an outer shell electron takes the place of the inner shell one. Because the outer electron must have a lower energy to fill the inner shell hole, it releases a photon with the equivalent energy of the difference between the two energy levels in the atom. This photon is the x-ray that is used to view objects such as bones.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the Bremsstrahlung x-ray generation method, the electron from the cathode is slowed as it passes the nucleus of an atom at the anode (Figure 6). As it slows and its path is changed, the loses energy (kinetic energy). This energy is also released as a photon which is subsequently called an x-ray. &lt;br /&gt;
Depending on the voltage and current of the tube and the material of the anode, different types (as in wavelengths and energy) of x-rays can be produced and each one. However, all X-rays will continue to pass through objects until it reaches a material dense that stops it. However, density of the material required depends on the energy of the x-ray. For example, during a medical x-ray, x-rays of a certain energy will pass through soft tissue (skin, organs, etc) but not through bones. The x-rays that pass through the soft tissue will strike the screen and the absence of the x-rays absorbed by the bones will cause a negative space on the screen. The areas where x-rays do not strike will form the image of the bone. While the principles remain the same, x-ray machines today use incredible sophisticated technology to specify the type of x-ray they want and have greatly increased in accuracy since Roentgen’s initial discovery.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_1.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 2:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_2.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 3:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_3.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 4:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_4.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 5:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_5.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 6:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_6.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Information and photographs are pulled from references 1 through 5 cited below*&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Already, during the Ancient Greek and Roman times, light was studied as the presence of deflection and refraction were noticed. &lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic radiation of wavelengths in the early 19th century. The discovery of infrared radiation is ascribed to astronomer William Herschel, who published his results in 1800 before the Royal Society of London. Herschel used a glass Triangular prism (optics)|prism to refract light from the Sun and detected invisible rays that caused heating beyond the red part of the spectrum, through an increase in the temperature recorded with a thermometer. These &amp;quot;calorific rays&amp;quot; were later termed infrared.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1801, Rohann Ritter, discovered the presence of ultraviolet light using salts. It was known that light could darken some silver halides and while doing so, he realized that the region beyond the violet bar (therefore ultraviolet) was more effective in changing the color of the halides. &lt;br /&gt;
However,in 1864, while summarizing the theories of his time accumulating into his famous set of Maxwell equations, James Clerk Maxwell managed to deduce the speed of light being around 3e8 meters per second. This was instrumental in creating the rest of the spectrum. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1887-1888 Physicist Heinrich Hertz not only tried to measure the velocity and frequency of electromagnetic radiation waves at other parts of the known spectrum of the time, but he was also able to prove that Maxwell&#039;s findings were correct. He did this on the microwave radiation as well. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The discovery of X-rays occurred in 1895 by Wilhelm Rontgen when his barium platinocyanide detector screen began to glow under the presence of a discharge that passed through a cathode ray tube although the latter was completely covered. Once he determined its possible use, he tried to look at his wife&#039;s hand using this new discovery. However x-ray spectroscopy was not institutionalized until later by Karl Manne Siegbahn. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1900, Paul Villard discovered Gamma rays although he initially thought that they were particles similar to alpha and beta particles which were emitted during radiation. These &#039;particles&#039; were later proven to be part of the electromagnetic spectrum. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
1. Elert, Glenn. &amp;quot;X-rays.&amp;quot; X-rays – The Physics Hypertextbook. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Apr. 2017. &lt;br /&gt;
http://physics.info/x-ray/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.&amp;quot;X-rays.&amp;quot; X-rays. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Apr. 2017. http://www.physics.isu.edu/radinf/xray.htm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. &amp;quot;Basics of X-ray PhysicsX-ray production.&amp;quot; Welcome to Radiology Masterclass. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Apr. 2017. http://www.radiologymasterclass.co.uk/tutorials/physics/x-ray_physics_production#top_2nd_img&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. &amp;quot;X-Rays.&amp;quot; Image: Electromagnetic Spectrum. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Apr. 2017. https://www.boundless.com/physics/textbooks/boundless-physics-textbook/electromagnetic-waves-23/the-electromagnetic-spectrum-165/x-rays-597-11175/images/electromagnetic-spectrum/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. &amp;quot;This Month in Physics History.&amp;quot; American Physical Society. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Apr. 2017. https://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/200111/history.cfm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. Editors, Spectroscopy. “The Electromagnetic Spectrum: A History.” Spectroscopy Home, 27 Oct. 2017, www.spectroscopyonline.com/electromagnetic-spectrum-history?id=&amp;amp;sk=&amp;amp;date=&amp;amp;&amp;amp;pageID=4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7. Chabay, Ruth W., and Bruce A. Sherwood. Matter &amp;amp; Interaction II: Electric &amp;amp; Magnetic Interactions, Version 1.2. John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons, 2003.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Samigues3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electromagnetic_Radiation&amp;diff=29504</id>
		<title>Electromagnetic Radiation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electromagnetic_Radiation&amp;diff=29504"/>
		<updated>2017-11-25T14:26:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Samigues3: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Claimed by Carlos Fernandez to edit (Spring 2016) &#039;&#039;&#039;Claimed by Sungyoung Joo(FALL 2016)&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;quot;&#039;Claimed by Monali Shah to edit (Spring 2017)&lt;br /&gt;
Claimed by Solange Amigues to edite (Fall 2017)&lt;br /&gt;
==Electromagnetic Radiation==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===What is a Electromagnetic(EM) Radiation?===&lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic radiation is a form of energy that is all around us and takes many forms, such as radio waves, microwaves, infrared, visible light, ultraviolet, x-rays, and gamma rays. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before 1873, electricity and magnetism were thought to be two different forces. However, in 1873, Scottish Physicist James Maxwell developed his famous theory of electromagnetism. There are four main electro magnetic interactions according to Maxwell:&lt;br /&gt;
* The force of attraction or repulsion between electric charges is inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them&lt;br /&gt;
* Magnetic poles come in pairs that attract and repel each other much as electric charges do&lt;br /&gt;
* An electric current in a wire produces a magnetic field whose direction depends on the direction of the current&lt;br /&gt;
* A moving electric field produces a magnetic field, and vice versa&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The four Maxwell&#039;s Equations provide a complete description of possible spatial patterns of electric and magnetic field in space. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Ampere-Maxwell Law]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gauss&#039;s Law]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Faraday&#039;s Law]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other than Maxwell&#039;s Four equations, there are general properties of all electromagnetic radiation:&lt;br /&gt;
* Electromagnetic radiation can travel through empty space. Most other types of waves must travel through some sort of substance. For example, sound waves need either a gas, solid, or liquid to pass through in order to be heard&lt;br /&gt;
* The speed of light is always a constant (3 x 10^8 m/s)&lt;br /&gt;
* Wavelengths are measured between the distances of either crests or troughs. It is usually characterized by the Greek symbol λ (gamma).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic waves are the self-propagating, mutual oscillation of electric and magnetic fields. The propagation of electromagnetic energy is often referred to as radiation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To go about solving/analyzing mathematically an electromagnetic field using Maxwell&#039;s equations,this is how we proceed (7)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Establish the space and time in which the electric and magnetic fields are present&lt;br /&gt;
*Check that Maxwell&#039;s equations can be applied in the situation above&lt;br /&gt;
*Check when the charge accelerates, it produces these fields&lt;br /&gt;
*Show how these fields would interact with matter&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The EM Spectrum==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
EM spectrum is a span of enormous range of wavelengths and frequencies. The EM spectrum is generally divided into 7 different regions, in order of decreasing wavelength and increasing energy and frequency. It ranges from Gamma rays to Long Radio Waves. Following are the lists of waves:&lt;br /&gt;
* Gamma rays&lt;br /&gt;
* X-rays&lt;br /&gt;
* UV rays&lt;br /&gt;
* Visible Light&lt;br /&gt;
* Infrared Rays&lt;br /&gt;
* Microwave&lt;br /&gt;
* Radio, TV&lt;br /&gt;
* Long radio waves&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:em-spectrum.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although all these waves do different things, there is one thing in common : They all travel in waves.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:spectrum_Properties.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Infrared radiation&#039;&#039;&#039; can be released as heat or thermal energy. It can also be bounced back, which is called near infrared because of its similarities with visible light energy. Infrared Radiation is most commonly used in remote sensing as infrared sensors collect thermal energy, providing us with weather conditions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:pic_snap_girl.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Visible Light&#039;&#039;&#039; is the only part of the electromagnetic spectrum that humans can see with a naked eye. This part of the spectrum includes a range of different colors that all represent a particular wavelength. Rainbows are formed in this way; light passes through matter in which it is absorbed or reflected based on its wavelength. As a result, some colors are reflected more than other, leading to the creation of a rainbow.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:pyramid123.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:rainbow.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Waves and Fields==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As we learned in class, electric field is produced when an electron is accelerating. Likewise, EM radiation is created when an atomic particle, like an electron, is accelerated by an electric field. The movement like this produces oscillating electric and magnetic fields, which travel at right angles to each other in a bundle of light energy called a photon. Photons travel in a harmonic wave at the fastest speed possible in the universe. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:waves image.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic waves are formed when an electric field couples with a magnetic field. Magnetic and electric fields of an electromagnetic wave are perpendicular to each other and to the direction of the wave. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A wavelength (in m) is the distance between two consecutive peaks of a wave. Frequency is the number of waves that form in a given length of time. A wavelength and frequency are interrelated. A short wavelength indicates that the frequency will be higher because one cycle can pass in a shorter amount of time. Likewise, a longer wavelength has a lower frequency because each cycle takes longer to complete.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:waves_1.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Waves can be classified according to their nature:&lt;br /&gt;
* Mechanical waves&lt;br /&gt;
* Electromagnetic waves&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Mechanical Waves&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mechanical waves require a medium (matter) to travel through. &lt;br /&gt;
Examples are sound waves, water waves, ripples in strings or springs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Water Waves&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:waterwaves.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Sound Waves&#039;&#039;  &lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:loudspeaker-waveform.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electromagnetic Waves&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic waves do not require a medium (matter) to travel through - they can travel through space.&lt;br /&gt;
Examples are radio waves, visible light, x-rays.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;X-RAYS&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:x-rays.jpeg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Radio Waves&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:facts-about-radio-waves.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Visible Lights&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:visible-spectrum123.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==A Mathematical Model==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The position of the particle is defined by a sine wave:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;y = ymaxsin(wt)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
         Where w is the angular frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Amplitude&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Amplitude is the distance from the maximum vertical displacement of the wave to the middle of the wave. The Amplitude of the sinusoidal Wave is the height of the peak in the wave measured from the zero line. This measures the magnitude of oscillation of a particular wave. The Amplitude is important because it tells you the intensity or brightness of a wave in comparison with other waves.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Period&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The period of the wave is the time between crests in seconds(s).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
T = 2pi/w-----(units of seconds)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Frequency&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Frequency is the number of cycles per second, and is expressed as sec-1 or Hertz(Hz). Frequency is directly proportional to energy and can be express as &amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039; E = hv &#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
where E is energy, h is Planck&#039;s constant ( 6.62607*10^-34J) and v is frequency&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
f = 1/T&lt;br /&gt;
f = w/2pi----(Units Hertz)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Wavelength&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wavelength is the distance between crests in meters. Wavelength is equal to the speed of light times frequency. Longer wavelength waves such as radio waves carry low energy; this is why we can listen to the radio without any harmful consequences. Shorter wavelength waves such as x-rays carry higher energy that can be hazardous to our health. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:shortlongwavelength.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Wavelength and Frequency&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The speed of light is the multiplication of the wavelength and frequency. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;c=λν &#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:visible_EM_modes.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This diagram shows all properties of waves:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:wave_props.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;ENERGY FLUX&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is defined by the following equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         S = (1/u0)*(E x B) in W/m^2&lt;br /&gt;
         where B = E/c&lt;br /&gt;
         where c = speed of light&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:energy_flux.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness: X-Rays==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic Radiation while commonly thought of as only including visible light, radio waves, UV waves, and gamma rays; also include X-rays. In 1895, X-rays were initially discovered by William Roentgen, who accidentally fell upon the most important discovery about his life (Figure 1). Roentgen was already working on cathode rays, and because of a fluorescent glow that occurred during his experiments, covered his experimental apparatus with heavy black paper. However, when he did this, he discovered a glow coming from a screen several feet away. Through many more experiments, he discovered that a new type of energy, not cathode rays, were the cause of the glow. He named them “x-rays” and received the 1901 Nobel Prize in Physics. Roentgen never patented his monumental discovery and as a result, numerous researchers set out to find a multitude of uses and capitalize on his work.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Primarily, people could now view objects that were hidden from plain view (i.e. scanners in airports). While X-rays are now used in 100’s of professions (security, chemistry, art galleries), its most important function is to view bones to determine abnormalities in humans. In fact, one of Roentgen’s first x-rays was of his wife’s hand (Figure 2). X-rays fall under the scope of electromagnetic radiation because, like all E.R. waves, it is comprised of photons. X-rays have wavelengths between 0.01 to 10 nanometers and fall between UV and Gamma Waves on the E.R. spectrum (Figure 3).&lt;br /&gt;
There are two main methods in which an x-ray may be formed. Both require a vacuum-filled tube called an x-ray tube (Figure 4). With an anode on one end and a cathode on the other, an electric current is applied and a high energy electron is projected from the cathode, through the vacuum, and at the anode. In the characteristic x-ray generation approach, the electron from the cathode  collides with an inner shell electron on an atom on the anode (Figure 5). Both of these electrons are ejected from the atom and an outer shell electron takes the place of the inner shell one. Because the outer electron must have a lower energy to fill the inner shell hole, it releases a photon with the equivalent energy of the difference between the two energy levels in the atom. This photon is the x-ray that is used to view objects such as bones.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the Bremsstrahlung x-ray generation method, the electron from the cathode is slowed as it passes the nucleus of an atom at the anode (Figure 6). As it slows and its path is changed, the loses energy (kinetic energy). This energy is also released as a photon which is subsequently called an x-ray. &lt;br /&gt;
Depending on the voltage and current of the tube and the material of the anode, different types (as in wavelengths and energy) of x-rays can be produced and each one. However, all X-rays will continue to pass through objects until it reaches a material dense that stops it. However, density of the material required depends on the energy of the x-ray. For example, during a medical x-ray, x-rays of a certain energy will pass through soft tissue (skin, organs, etc) but not through bones. The x-rays that pass through the soft tissue will strike the screen and the absence of the x-rays absorbed by the bones will cause a negative space on the screen. The areas where x-rays do not strike will form the image of the bone. While the principles remain the same, x-ray machines today use incredible sophisticated technology to specify the type of x-ray they want and have greatly increased in accuracy since Roentgen’s initial discovery.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_1.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 2:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_2.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 3:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_3.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 4:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_4.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 5:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_5.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 6:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_6.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Information and photographs are pulled from references 1 through 5 cited below*&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Already, during the Ancient Greek and Roman times, light was studied as the presence of deflection and refraction were noticed. &lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic radiation of wavelengths in the early 19th century. The discovery of infrared radiation is ascribed to astronomer William Herschel, who published his results in 1800 before the Royal Society of London. Herschel used a glass Triangular prism (optics)|prism to refract light from the Sun and detected invisible rays that caused heating beyond the red part of the spectrum, through an increase in the temperature recorded with a thermometer. These &amp;quot;calorific rays&amp;quot; were later termed infrared.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1801, Rohann Ritter, discovered the presence of ultraviolet light using salts. It was known that light could darken some silver halides and while doing so, he realized that the region beyond the violet bar (therefore ultraviolet) was more effective in changing the color of the halides. &lt;br /&gt;
However,in 1864, while summarizing the theories of his time accumulating into his famous set of Maxwell equations, James Clerk Maxwell managed to deduce the speed of light being around 3e8 meters per second. This was instrumental in creating the rest of the spectrum. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1887-1888 Physicist Heinrich Hertz not only tried to measure the velocity and frequency of electromagnetic radiation waves at other parts of the known spectrum of the time, but he was also able to prove that Maxwell&#039;s findings were correct. He did this on the microwave radiation as well. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The discovery of X-rays occurred in 1895 by Wilhelm Rontgen when his barium platinocyanide detector screen began to glow under the presence of a discharge that passed through a cathode ray tube although the latter was completely covered. Once he determined its possible use, he tried to look at his wife&#039;s hand using this new discovery. However x-ray spectroscopy was not institutionalized until later by Karl Manne Siegbahn. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1900, Paul Villard discovered Gamma rays although he initially thought that they were particles similar to alpha and beta particles which were emitted during radiation. These &#039;particles&#039; were later proven to be part of the electromagnetic spectrum. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
1. Elert, Glenn. &amp;quot;X-rays.&amp;quot; X-rays – The Physics Hypertextbook. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Apr. 2017. &lt;br /&gt;
http://physics.info/x-ray/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.&amp;quot;X-rays.&amp;quot; X-rays. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Apr. 2017. http://www.physics.isu.edu/radinf/xray.htm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. &amp;quot;Basics of X-ray PhysicsX-ray production.&amp;quot; Welcome to Radiology Masterclass. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Apr. 2017. http://www.radiologymasterclass.co.uk/tutorials/physics/x-ray_physics_production#top_2nd_img&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. &amp;quot;X-Rays.&amp;quot; Image: Electromagnetic Spectrum. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Apr. 2017. https://www.boundless.com/physics/textbooks/boundless-physics-textbook/electromagnetic-waves-23/the-electromagnetic-spectrum-165/x-rays-597-11175/images/electromagnetic-spectrum/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. &amp;quot;This Month in Physics History.&amp;quot; American Physical Society. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Apr. 2017. https://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/200111/history.cfm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. Editors, Spectroscopy. “The Electromagnetic Spectrum: A History.” Spectroscopy Home, 27 Oct. 2017, www.spectroscopyonline.com/electromagnetic-spectrum-history?id=&amp;amp;sk=&amp;amp;date=&amp;amp;&amp;amp;pageID=4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7. Chabay, Ruth W., and Bruce A. Sherwood. Matter &amp;amp; Interaction II: Electric &amp;amp; Magnetic Interactions, Version 1.2. John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons, 2003.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Samigues3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electromagnetic_Radiation&amp;diff=29503</id>
		<title>Electromagnetic Radiation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electromagnetic_Radiation&amp;diff=29503"/>
		<updated>2017-11-25T14:23:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Samigues3: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Claimed by Carlos Fernandez to edit (Spring 2016) &#039;&#039;&#039;Claimed by Sungyoung Joo(FALL 2016)&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;quot;&#039;Claimed by Monali Shah to edit (Spring 2017)&lt;br /&gt;
Claimed by Solange Amigues to edite (Fall 2017)&lt;br /&gt;
==Electromagnetic Radiation==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===What is a Electromagnetic(EM) Radiation?===&lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic radiation is a form of energy that is all around us and takes many forms, such as radio waves, microwaves, infrared, visible light, ultraviolet, x-rays, and gamma rays. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before 1873, electricity and magnetism were thought to be two different forces. However, in 1873, Scottish Physicist James Maxwell developed his famous theory of electromagnetism. There are four main electro magnetic interactions according to Maxwell:&lt;br /&gt;
* The force of attraction or repulsion between electric charges is inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them&lt;br /&gt;
* Magnetic poles come in pairs that attract and repel each other much as electric charges do&lt;br /&gt;
* An electric current in a wire produces a magnetic field whose direction depends on the direction of the current&lt;br /&gt;
* A moving electric field produces a magnetic field, and vice versa&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The four Maxwell&#039;s Equations provide a complete description of possible spatial patterns of electric and magnetic field in space. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Ampere-Maxwell Law]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gauss&#039;s Law]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Faraday&#039;s Law]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other than Maxwell&#039;s Four equations, there are general properties of all electromagnetic radiation:&lt;br /&gt;
* Electromagnetic radiation can travel through empty space. Most other types of waves must travel through some sort of substance. For example, sound waves need either a gas, solid, or liquid to pass through in order to be heard&lt;br /&gt;
* The speed of light is always a constant (3 x 10^8 m/s)&lt;br /&gt;
* Wavelengths are measured between the distances of either crests or troughs. It is usually characterized by the Greek symbol λ (gamma).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic waves are the self-propagating, mutual oscillation of electric and magnetic fields. The propagation of electromagnetic energy is often referred to as radiation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To go about solving/analyzing mathematically an electromagnetic field using Maxwell&#039;s equations,this is how we proceed (7)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Establish the space and time in which the electric and magnetic fields are present&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Check that Maxwell&#039;s equations can be applied in the situation above&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Check when the charge accelerates, it produces these fields&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Show how these fields would interact with matter&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The EM Spectrum==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
EM spectrum is a span of enormous range of wavelengths and frequencies. The EM spectrum is generally divided into 7 different regions, in order of decreasing wavelength and increasing energy and frequency. It ranges from Gamma rays to Long Radio Waves. Following are the lists of waves:&lt;br /&gt;
* Gamma rays&lt;br /&gt;
* X-rays&lt;br /&gt;
* UV rays&lt;br /&gt;
* Visible Light&lt;br /&gt;
* Infrared Rays&lt;br /&gt;
* Microwave&lt;br /&gt;
* Radio, TV&lt;br /&gt;
* Long radio waves&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:em-spectrum.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although all these waves do different things, there is one thing in common : They all travel in waves.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:spectrum_Properties.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Infrared radiation&#039;&#039;&#039; can be released as heat or thermal energy. It can also be bounced back, which is called near infrared because of its similarities with visible light energy. Infrared Radiation is most commonly used in remote sensing as infrared sensors collect thermal energy, providing us with weather conditions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:pic_snap_girl.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Visible Light&#039;&#039;&#039; is the only part of the electromagnetic spectrum that humans can see with a naked eye. This part of the spectrum includes a range of different colors that all represent a particular wavelength. Rainbows are formed in this way; light passes through matter in which it is absorbed or reflected based on its wavelength. As a result, some colors are reflected more than other, leading to the creation of a rainbow.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:pyramid123.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:rainbow.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Waves and Fields==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As we learned in class, electric field is produced when an electron is accelerating. Likewise, EM radiation is created when an atomic particle, like an electron, is accelerated by an electric field. The movement like this produces oscillating electric and magnetic fields, which travel at right angles to each other in a bundle of light energy called a photon. Photons travel in a harmonic wave at the fastest speed possible in the universe. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:waves image.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic waves are formed when an electric field couples with a magnetic field. Magnetic and electric fields of an electromagnetic wave are perpendicular to each other and to the direction of the wave. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A wavelength (in m) is the distance between two consecutive peaks of a wave. Frequency is the number of waves that form in a given length of time. A wavelength and frequency are interrelated. A short wavelength indicates that the frequency will be higher because one cycle can pass in a shorter amount of time. Likewise, a longer wavelength has a lower frequency because each cycle takes longer to complete.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:waves_1.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Waves can be classified according to their nature:&lt;br /&gt;
* Mechanical waves&lt;br /&gt;
* Electromagnetic waves&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Mechanical Waves&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mechanical waves require a medium (matter) to travel through. &lt;br /&gt;
Examples are sound waves, water waves, ripples in strings or springs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Water Waves&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:waterwaves.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Sound Waves&#039;&#039;  &lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:loudspeaker-waveform.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electromagnetic Waves&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic waves do not require a medium (matter) to travel through - they can travel through space.&lt;br /&gt;
Examples are radio waves, visible light, x-rays.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;X-RAYS&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:x-rays.jpeg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Radio Waves&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:facts-about-radio-waves.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Visible Lights&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:visible-spectrum123.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==A Mathematical Model==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The position of the particle is defined by a sine wave:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;y = ymaxsin(wt)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
         Where w is the angular frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Amplitude&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Amplitude is the distance from the maximum vertical displacement of the wave to the middle of the wave. The Amplitude of the sinusoidal Wave is the height of the peak in the wave measured from the zero line. This measures the magnitude of oscillation of a particular wave. The Amplitude is important because it tells you the intensity or brightness of a wave in comparison with other waves.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Period&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The period of the wave is the time between crests in seconds(s).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
T = 2pi/w-----(units of seconds)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Frequency&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Frequency is the number of cycles per second, and is expressed as sec-1 or Hertz(Hz). Frequency is directly proportional to energy and can be express as &amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039; E = hv &#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
where E is energy, h is Planck&#039;s constant ( 6.62607*10^-34J) and v is frequency&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
f = 1/T&lt;br /&gt;
f = w/2pi----(Units Hertz)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Wavelength&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wavelength is the distance between crests in meters. Wavelength is equal to the speed of light times frequency. Longer wavelength waves such as radio waves carry low energy; this is why we can listen to the radio without any harmful consequences. Shorter wavelength waves such as x-rays carry higher energy that can be hazardous to our health. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:shortlongwavelength.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Wavelength and Frequency&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The speed of light is the multiplication of the wavelength and frequency. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;c=λν &#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:visible_EM_modes.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This diagram shows all properties of waves:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:wave_props.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;ENERGY FLUX&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is defined by the following equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         S = (1/u0)*(E x B) in W/m^2&lt;br /&gt;
         where B = E/c&lt;br /&gt;
         where c = speed of light&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:energy_flux.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness: X-Rays==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic Radiation while commonly thought of as only including visible light, radio waves, UV waves, and gamma rays; also include X-rays. In 1895, X-rays were initially discovered by William Roentgen, who accidentally fell upon the most important discovery about his life (Figure 1). Roentgen was already working on cathode rays, and because of a fluorescent glow that occurred during his experiments, covered his experimental apparatus with heavy black paper. However, when he did this, he discovered a glow coming from a screen several feet away. Through many more experiments, he discovered that a new type of energy, not cathode rays, were the cause of the glow. He named them “x-rays” and received the 1901 Nobel Prize in Physics. Roentgen never patented his monumental discovery and as a result, numerous researchers set out to find a multitude of uses and capitalize on his work.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Primarily, people could now view objects that were hidden from plain view (i.e. scanners in airports). While X-rays are now used in 100’s of professions (security, chemistry, art galleries), its most important function is to view bones to determine abnormalities in humans. In fact, one of Roentgen’s first x-rays was of his wife’s hand (Figure 2). X-rays fall under the scope of electromagnetic radiation because, like all E.R. waves, it is comprised of photons. X-rays have wavelengths between 0.01 to 10 nanometers and fall between UV and Gamma Waves on the E.R. spectrum (Figure 3).&lt;br /&gt;
There are two main methods in which an x-ray may be formed. Both require a vacuum-filled tube called an x-ray tube (Figure 4). With an anode on one end and a cathode on the other, an electric current is applied and a high energy electron is projected from the cathode, through the vacuum, and at the anode. In the characteristic x-ray generation approach, the electron from the cathode  collides with an inner shell electron on an atom on the anode (Figure 5). Both of these electrons are ejected from the atom and an outer shell electron takes the place of the inner shell one. Because the outer electron must have a lower energy to fill the inner shell hole, it releases a photon with the equivalent energy of the difference between the two energy levels in the atom. This photon is the x-ray that is used to view objects such as bones.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the Bremsstrahlung x-ray generation method, the electron from the cathode is slowed as it passes the nucleus of an atom at the anode (Figure 6). As it slows and its path is changed, the loses energy (kinetic energy). This energy is also released as a photon which is subsequently called an x-ray. &lt;br /&gt;
Depending on the voltage and current of the tube and the material of the anode, different types (as in wavelengths and energy) of x-rays can be produced and each one. However, all X-rays will continue to pass through objects until it reaches a material dense that stops it. However, density of the material required depends on the energy of the x-ray. For example, during a medical x-ray, x-rays of a certain energy will pass through soft tissue (skin, organs, etc) but not through bones. The x-rays that pass through the soft tissue will strike the screen and the absence of the x-rays absorbed by the bones will cause a negative space on the screen. The areas where x-rays do not strike will form the image of the bone. While the principles remain the same, x-ray machines today use incredible sophisticated technology to specify the type of x-ray they want and have greatly increased in accuracy since Roentgen’s initial discovery.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_1.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 2:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_2.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 3:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_3.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 4:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_4.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 5:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_5.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 6:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_6.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Information and photographs are pulled from references 1 through 5 cited below*&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Already, during the Ancient Greek and Roman times, light was studied as the presence of deflection and refraction were noticed. &lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic radiation of wavelengths in the early 19th century. The discovery of infrared radiation is ascribed to astronomer William Herschel, who published his results in 1800 before the Royal Society of London. Herschel used a glass Triangular prism (optics)|prism to refract light from the Sun and detected invisible rays that caused heating beyond the red part of the spectrum, through an increase in the temperature recorded with a thermometer. These &amp;quot;calorific rays&amp;quot; were later termed infrared.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1801, Rohann Ritter, discovered the presence of ultraviolet light using salts. It was known that light could darken some silver halides and while doing so, he realized that the region beyond the violet bar (therefore ultraviolet) was more effective in changing the color of the halides. &lt;br /&gt;
However,in 1864, while summarizing the theories of his time accumulating into his famous set of Maxwell equations, James Clerk Maxwell managed to deduce the speed of light being around 3e8 meters per second. This was instrumental in creating the rest of the spectrum. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1887-1888 Physicist Heinrich Hertz not only tried to measure the velocity and frequency of electromagnetic radiation waves at other parts of the known spectrum of the time, but he was also able to prove that Maxwell&#039;s findings were correct. He did this on the microwave radiation as well. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The discovery of X-rays occurred in 1895 by Wilhelm Rontgen when his barium platinocyanide detector screen began to glow under the presence of a discharge that passed through a cathode ray tube although the latter was completely covered. Once he determined its possible use, he tried to look at his wife&#039;s hand using this new discovery. However x-ray spectroscopy was not institutionalized until later by Karl Manne Siegbahn. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1900, Paul Villard discovered Gamma rays although he initially thought that they were particles similar to alpha and beta particles which were emitted during radiation. These &#039;particles&#039; were later proven to be part of the electromagnetic spectrum. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
1. Elert, Glenn. &amp;quot;X-rays.&amp;quot; X-rays – The Physics Hypertextbook. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Apr. 2017. &lt;br /&gt;
http://physics.info/x-ray/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.&amp;quot;X-rays.&amp;quot; X-rays. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Apr. 2017. http://www.physics.isu.edu/radinf/xray.htm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. &amp;quot;Basics of X-ray PhysicsX-ray production.&amp;quot; Welcome to Radiology Masterclass. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Apr. 2017. http://www.radiologymasterclass.co.uk/tutorials/physics/x-ray_physics_production#top_2nd_img&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. &amp;quot;X-Rays.&amp;quot; Image: Electromagnetic Spectrum. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Apr. 2017. https://www.boundless.com/physics/textbooks/boundless-physics-textbook/electromagnetic-waves-23/the-electromagnetic-spectrum-165/x-rays-597-11175/images/electromagnetic-spectrum/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. &amp;quot;This Month in Physics History.&amp;quot; American Physical Society. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Apr. 2017. https://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/200111/history.cfm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. Editors, Spectroscopy. “The Electromagnetic Spectrum: A History.” Spectroscopy Home, 27 Oct. 2017, www.spectroscopyonline.com/electromagnetic-spectrum-history?id=&amp;amp;sk=&amp;amp;date=&amp;amp;&amp;amp;pageID=4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7. Chabay, Ruth W., and Bruce A. Sherwood. Matter &amp;amp; Interaction II: Electric &amp;amp; Magnetic Interactions, Version 1.2. John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons, 2003.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Samigues3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electromagnetic_Radiation&amp;diff=29502</id>
		<title>Electromagnetic Radiation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electromagnetic_Radiation&amp;diff=29502"/>
		<updated>2017-11-25T14:23:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Samigues3: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Claimed by Carlos Fernandez to edit (Spring 2016) &#039;&#039;&#039;Claimed by Sungyoung Joo(FALL 2016)&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;quot;&#039;Claimed by Monali Shah to edit (Spring 2017)&lt;br /&gt;
Claimed by Solange Amigues to edite (Fall 2017)&lt;br /&gt;
==Electromagnetic Radiation==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===What is a Electromagnetic(EM) Radiation?===&lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic radiation is a form of energy that is all around us and takes many forms, such as radio waves, microwaves, infrared, visible light, ultraviolet, x-rays, and gamma rays. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before 1873, electricity and magnetism were thought to be two different forces. However, in 1873, Scottish Physicist James Maxwell developed his famous theory of electromagnetism. There are four main electro magnetic interactions according to Maxwell:&lt;br /&gt;
* The force of attraction or repulsion between electric charges is inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them&lt;br /&gt;
* Magnetic poles come in pairs that attract and repel each other much as electric charges do&lt;br /&gt;
* An electric current in a wire produces a magnetic field whose direction depends on the direction of the current&lt;br /&gt;
* A moving electric field produces a magnetic field, and vice versa&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The four Maxwell&#039;s Equations provide a complete description of possible spatial patterns of electric and magnetic field in space. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Ampere-Maxwell Law]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gauss&#039;s Law]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Faraday&#039;s Law]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other than Maxwell&#039;s Four equations, there are general properties of all electromagnetic radiation:&lt;br /&gt;
* Electromagnetic radiation can travel through empty space. Most other types of waves must travel through some sort of substance. For example, sound waves need either a gas, solid, or liquid to pass through in order to be heard&lt;br /&gt;
* The speed of light is always a constant (3 x 10^8 m/s)&lt;br /&gt;
* Wavelengths are measured between the distances of either crests or troughs. It is usually characterized by the Greek symbol λ (gamma).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic waves are the self-propagating, mutual oscillation of electric and magnetic fields. The propagation of electromagnetic energy is often referred to as radiation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To go about solving/analyzing mathematically an electromagnetic field using Maxwell&#039;s equations,this is how we proceed (7)&lt;br /&gt;
Establish the space and time in which the electric and magnetic fields are present&lt;br /&gt;
Check that Maxwell&#039;s equations can be applied in the situation above&lt;br /&gt;
Check when the charge accelerates, it produces these fields&lt;br /&gt;
Show how these fields would interact with matter&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The EM Spectrum==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
EM spectrum is a span of enormous range of wavelengths and frequencies. The EM spectrum is generally divided into 7 different regions, in order of decreasing wavelength and increasing energy and frequency. It ranges from Gamma rays to Long Radio Waves. Following are the lists of waves:&lt;br /&gt;
* Gamma rays&lt;br /&gt;
* X-rays&lt;br /&gt;
* UV rays&lt;br /&gt;
* Visible Light&lt;br /&gt;
* Infrared Rays&lt;br /&gt;
* Microwave&lt;br /&gt;
* Radio, TV&lt;br /&gt;
* Long radio waves&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:em-spectrum.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although all these waves do different things, there is one thing in common : They all travel in waves.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:spectrum_Properties.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Infrared radiation&#039;&#039;&#039; can be released as heat or thermal energy. It can also be bounced back, which is called near infrared because of its similarities with visible light energy. Infrared Radiation is most commonly used in remote sensing as infrared sensors collect thermal energy, providing us with weather conditions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:pic_snap_girl.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Visible Light&#039;&#039;&#039; is the only part of the electromagnetic spectrum that humans can see with a naked eye. This part of the spectrum includes a range of different colors that all represent a particular wavelength. Rainbows are formed in this way; light passes through matter in which it is absorbed or reflected based on its wavelength. As a result, some colors are reflected more than other, leading to the creation of a rainbow.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:pyramid123.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:rainbow.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Waves and Fields==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As we learned in class, electric field is produced when an electron is accelerating. Likewise, EM radiation is created when an atomic particle, like an electron, is accelerated by an electric field. The movement like this produces oscillating electric and magnetic fields, which travel at right angles to each other in a bundle of light energy called a photon. Photons travel in a harmonic wave at the fastest speed possible in the universe. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:waves image.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic waves are formed when an electric field couples with a magnetic field. Magnetic and electric fields of an electromagnetic wave are perpendicular to each other and to the direction of the wave. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A wavelength (in m) is the distance between two consecutive peaks of a wave. Frequency is the number of waves that form in a given length of time. A wavelength and frequency are interrelated. A short wavelength indicates that the frequency will be higher because one cycle can pass in a shorter amount of time. Likewise, a longer wavelength has a lower frequency because each cycle takes longer to complete.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:waves_1.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Waves can be classified according to their nature:&lt;br /&gt;
* Mechanical waves&lt;br /&gt;
* Electromagnetic waves&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Mechanical Waves&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mechanical waves require a medium (matter) to travel through. &lt;br /&gt;
Examples are sound waves, water waves, ripples in strings or springs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Water Waves&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:waterwaves.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Sound Waves&#039;&#039;  &lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:loudspeaker-waveform.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electromagnetic Waves&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic waves do not require a medium (matter) to travel through - they can travel through space.&lt;br /&gt;
Examples are radio waves, visible light, x-rays.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;X-RAYS&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:x-rays.jpeg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Radio Waves&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:facts-about-radio-waves.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Visible Lights&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:visible-spectrum123.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==A Mathematical Model==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The position of the particle is defined by a sine wave:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;y = ymaxsin(wt)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
         Where w is the angular frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Amplitude&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Amplitude is the distance from the maximum vertical displacement of the wave to the middle of the wave. The Amplitude of the sinusoidal Wave is the height of the peak in the wave measured from the zero line. This measures the magnitude of oscillation of a particular wave. The Amplitude is important because it tells you the intensity or brightness of a wave in comparison with other waves.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Period&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The period of the wave is the time between crests in seconds(s).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
T = 2pi/w-----(units of seconds)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Frequency&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Frequency is the number of cycles per second, and is expressed as sec-1 or Hertz(Hz). Frequency is directly proportional to energy and can be express as &amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039; E = hv &#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
where E is energy, h is Planck&#039;s constant ( 6.62607*10^-34J) and v is frequency&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
f = 1/T&lt;br /&gt;
f = w/2pi----(Units Hertz)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Wavelength&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wavelength is the distance between crests in meters. Wavelength is equal to the speed of light times frequency. Longer wavelength waves such as radio waves carry low energy; this is why we can listen to the radio without any harmful consequences. Shorter wavelength waves such as x-rays carry higher energy that can be hazardous to our health. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:shortlongwavelength.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Wavelength and Frequency&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The speed of light is the multiplication of the wavelength and frequency. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;c=λν &#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:visible_EM_modes.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This diagram shows all properties of waves:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:wave_props.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;ENERGY FLUX&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is defined by the following equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         S = (1/u0)*(E x B) in W/m^2&lt;br /&gt;
         where B = E/c&lt;br /&gt;
         where c = speed of light&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:energy_flux.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness: X-Rays==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic Radiation while commonly thought of as only including visible light, radio waves, UV waves, and gamma rays; also include X-rays. In 1895, X-rays were initially discovered by William Roentgen, who accidentally fell upon the most important discovery about his life (Figure 1). Roentgen was already working on cathode rays, and because of a fluorescent glow that occurred during his experiments, covered his experimental apparatus with heavy black paper. However, when he did this, he discovered a glow coming from a screen several feet away. Through many more experiments, he discovered that a new type of energy, not cathode rays, were the cause of the glow. He named them “x-rays” and received the 1901 Nobel Prize in Physics. Roentgen never patented his monumental discovery and as a result, numerous researchers set out to find a multitude of uses and capitalize on his work.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Primarily, people could now view objects that were hidden from plain view (i.e. scanners in airports). While X-rays are now used in 100’s of professions (security, chemistry, art galleries), its most important function is to view bones to determine abnormalities in humans. In fact, one of Roentgen’s first x-rays was of his wife’s hand (Figure 2). X-rays fall under the scope of electromagnetic radiation because, like all E.R. waves, it is comprised of photons. X-rays have wavelengths between 0.01 to 10 nanometers and fall between UV and Gamma Waves on the E.R. spectrum (Figure 3).&lt;br /&gt;
There are two main methods in which an x-ray may be formed. Both require a vacuum-filled tube called an x-ray tube (Figure 4). With an anode on one end and a cathode on the other, an electric current is applied and a high energy electron is projected from the cathode, through the vacuum, and at the anode. In the characteristic x-ray generation approach, the electron from the cathode  collides with an inner shell electron on an atom on the anode (Figure 5). Both of these electrons are ejected from the atom and an outer shell electron takes the place of the inner shell one. Because the outer electron must have a lower energy to fill the inner shell hole, it releases a photon with the equivalent energy of the difference between the two energy levels in the atom. This photon is the x-ray that is used to view objects such as bones.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the Bremsstrahlung x-ray generation method, the electron from the cathode is slowed as it passes the nucleus of an atom at the anode (Figure 6). As it slows and its path is changed, the loses energy (kinetic energy). This energy is also released as a photon which is subsequently called an x-ray. &lt;br /&gt;
Depending on the voltage and current of the tube and the material of the anode, different types (as in wavelengths and energy) of x-rays can be produced and each one. However, all X-rays will continue to pass through objects until it reaches a material dense that stops it. However, density of the material required depends on the energy of the x-ray. For example, during a medical x-ray, x-rays of a certain energy will pass through soft tissue (skin, organs, etc) but not through bones. The x-rays that pass through the soft tissue will strike the screen and the absence of the x-rays absorbed by the bones will cause a negative space on the screen. The areas where x-rays do not strike will form the image of the bone. While the principles remain the same, x-ray machines today use incredible sophisticated technology to specify the type of x-ray they want and have greatly increased in accuracy since Roentgen’s initial discovery.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_1.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 2:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_2.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 3:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_3.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 4:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_4.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 5:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_5.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 6:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_6.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Information and photographs are pulled from references 1 through 5 cited below*&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Already, during the Ancient Greek and Roman times, light was studied as the presence of deflection and refraction were noticed. &lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic radiation of wavelengths in the early 19th century. The discovery of infrared radiation is ascribed to astronomer William Herschel, who published his results in 1800 before the Royal Society of London. Herschel used a glass Triangular prism (optics)|prism to refract light from the Sun and detected invisible rays that caused heating beyond the red part of the spectrum, through an increase in the temperature recorded with a thermometer. These &amp;quot;calorific rays&amp;quot; were later termed infrared.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1801, Rohann Ritter, discovered the presence of ultraviolet light using salts. It was known that light could darken some silver halides and while doing so, he realized that the region beyond the violet bar (therefore ultraviolet) was more effective in changing the color of the halides. &lt;br /&gt;
However,in 1864, while summarizing the theories of his time accumulating into his famous set of Maxwell equations, James Clerk Maxwell managed to deduce the speed of light being around 3e8 meters per second. This was instrumental in creating the rest of the spectrum. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1887-1888 Physicist Heinrich Hertz not only tried to measure the velocity and frequency of electromagnetic radiation waves at other parts of the known spectrum of the time, but he was also able to prove that Maxwell&#039;s findings were correct. He did this on the microwave radiation as well. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The discovery of X-rays occurred in 1895 by Wilhelm Rontgen when his barium platinocyanide detector screen began to glow under the presence of a discharge that passed through a cathode ray tube although the latter was completely covered. Once he determined its possible use, he tried to look at his wife&#039;s hand using this new discovery. However x-ray spectroscopy was not institutionalized until later by Karl Manne Siegbahn. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1900, Paul Villard discovered Gamma rays although he initially thought that they were particles similar to alpha and beta particles which were emitted during radiation. These &#039;particles&#039; were later proven to be part of the electromagnetic spectrum. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
1. Elert, Glenn. &amp;quot;X-rays.&amp;quot; X-rays – The Physics Hypertextbook. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Apr. 2017. &lt;br /&gt;
http://physics.info/x-ray/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.&amp;quot;X-rays.&amp;quot; X-rays. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Apr. 2017. http://www.physics.isu.edu/radinf/xray.htm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. &amp;quot;Basics of X-ray PhysicsX-ray production.&amp;quot; Welcome to Radiology Masterclass. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Apr. 2017. http://www.radiologymasterclass.co.uk/tutorials/physics/x-ray_physics_production#top_2nd_img&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. &amp;quot;X-Rays.&amp;quot; Image: Electromagnetic Spectrum. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Apr. 2017. https://www.boundless.com/physics/textbooks/boundless-physics-textbook/electromagnetic-waves-23/the-electromagnetic-spectrum-165/x-rays-597-11175/images/electromagnetic-spectrum/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. &amp;quot;This Month in Physics History.&amp;quot; American Physical Society. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Apr. 2017. https://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/200111/history.cfm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. Editors, Spectroscopy. “The Electromagnetic Spectrum: A History.” Spectroscopy Home, 27 Oct. 2017, www.spectroscopyonline.com/electromagnetic-spectrum-history?id=&amp;amp;sk=&amp;amp;date=&amp;amp;&amp;amp;pageID=4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7. Chabay, Ruth W., and Bruce A. Sherwood. Matter &amp;amp; Interaction II: Electric &amp;amp; Magnetic Interactions, Version 1.2. John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons, 2003.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Samigues3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electromagnetic_Radiation&amp;diff=29501</id>
		<title>Electromagnetic Radiation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electromagnetic_Radiation&amp;diff=29501"/>
		<updated>2017-11-25T04:37:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Samigues3: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Claimed by Carlos Fernandez to edit (Spring 2016) &#039;&#039;&#039;Claimed by Sungyoung Joo(FALL 2016)&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;quot;&#039;Claimed by Monali Shah to edit (Spring 2017)&lt;br /&gt;
Claimed by Solange Amigues to edite (Fall 2017)&lt;br /&gt;
==Electromagnetic Radiation==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===What is a Electromagnetic(EM) Radiation?===&lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic radiation is a form of energy that is all around us and takes many forms, such as radio waves, microwaves, infrared, visible light, ultraviolet, x-rays, and gamma rays. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before 1873, electricity and magnetism were thought to be two different forces. However, in 1873, Scottish Physicist James Maxwell developed his famous theory of electromagnetism. There are four main electro magnetic interactions according to Maxwell:&lt;br /&gt;
* The force of attraction or repulsion between electric charges is inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them&lt;br /&gt;
* Magnetic poles come in pairs that attract and repel each other much as electric charges do&lt;br /&gt;
* An electric current in a wire produces a magnetic field whose direction depends on the direction of the current&lt;br /&gt;
* A moving electric field produces a magnetic field, and vice versa&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The four Maxwell&#039;s Equations provide a complete description of possible spatial patterns of electric and magnetic field in space. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Ampere-Maxwell Law]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gauss&#039;s Law]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Faraday&#039;s Law]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other than Maxwell&#039;s Four equations, there are general properties of all electromagnetic radiation:&lt;br /&gt;
* Electromagnetic radiation can travel through empty space. Most other types of waves must travel through some sort of substance. For example, sound waves need either a gas, solid, or liquid to pass through in order to be heard&lt;br /&gt;
* The speed of light is always a constant (3 x 10^8 m/s)&lt;br /&gt;
* Wavelengths are measured between the distances of either crests or troughs. It is usually characterized by the Greek symbol λ (gamma).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic waves are the self-propagating, mutual oscillation of electric and magnetic fields. The propagation of electromagnetic energy is often referred to as radiation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The EM Spectrum==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
EM spectrum is a span of enormous range of wavelengths and frequencies. The EM spectrum is generally divided into 7 different regions, in order of decreasing wavelength and increasing energy and frequency. It ranges from Gamma rays to Long Radio Waves. Following are the lists of waves:&lt;br /&gt;
* Gamma rays&lt;br /&gt;
* X-rays&lt;br /&gt;
* UV rays&lt;br /&gt;
* Visible Light&lt;br /&gt;
* Infrared Rays&lt;br /&gt;
* Microwave&lt;br /&gt;
* Radio, TV&lt;br /&gt;
* Long radio waves&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:em-spectrum.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although all these waves do different things, there is one thing in common : They all travel in waves.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:spectrum_Properties.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Infrared radiation&#039;&#039;&#039; can be released as heat or thermal energy. It can also be bounced back, which is called near infrared because of its similarities with visible light energy. Infrared Radiation is most commonly used in remote sensing as infrared sensors collect thermal energy, providing us with weather conditions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:pic_snap_girl.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Visible Light&#039;&#039;&#039; is the only part of the electromagnetic spectrum that humans can see with a naked eye. This part of the spectrum includes a range of different colors that all represent a particular wavelength. Rainbows are formed in this way; light passes through matter in which it is absorbed or reflected based on its wavelength. As a result, some colors are reflected more than other, leading to the creation of a rainbow.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:pyramid123.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:rainbow.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Waves and Fields==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As we learned in class, electric field is produced when an electron is accelerating. Likewise, EM radiation is created when an atomic particle, like an electron, is accelerated by an electric field. The movement like this produces oscillating electric and magnetic fields, which travel at right angles to each other in a bundle of light energy called a photon. Photons travel in a harmonic wave at the fastest speed possible in the universe. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:waves image.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic waves are formed when an electric field couples with a magnetic field. Magnetic and electric fields of an electromagnetic wave are perpendicular to each other and to the direction of the wave. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A wavelength (in m) is the distance between two consecutive peaks of a wave. Frequency is the number of waves that form in a given length of time. A wavelength and frequency are interrelated. A short wavelength indicates that the frequency will be higher because one cycle can pass in a shorter amount of time. Likewise, a longer wavelength has a lower frequency because each cycle takes longer to complete.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:waves_1.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Waves can be classified according to their nature:&lt;br /&gt;
* Mechanical waves&lt;br /&gt;
* Electromagnetic waves&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Mechanical Waves&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mechanical waves require a medium (matter) to travel through. &lt;br /&gt;
Examples are sound waves, water waves, ripples in strings or springs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Water Waves&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:waterwaves.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Sound Waves&#039;&#039;  &lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:loudspeaker-waveform.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electromagnetic Waves&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic waves do not require a medium (matter) to travel through - they can travel through space.&lt;br /&gt;
Examples are radio waves, visible light, x-rays.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;X-RAYS&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:x-rays.jpeg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Radio Waves&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:facts-about-radio-waves.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Visible Lights&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:visible-spectrum123.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==A Mathematical Model==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The position of the particle is defined by a sine wave:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;y = ymaxsin(wt)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
         Where w is the angular frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Amplitude&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Amplitude is the distance from the maximum vertical displacement of the wave to the middle of the wave. The Amplitude of the sinusoidal Wave is the height of the peak in the wave measured from the zero line. This measures the magnitude of oscillation of a particular wave. The Amplitude is important because it tells you the intensity or brightness of a wave in comparison with other waves.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Period&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The period of the wave is the time between crests in seconds(s).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
T = 2pi/w-----(units of seconds)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Frequency&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Frequency is the number of cycles per second, and is expressed as sec-1 or Hertz(Hz). Frequency is directly proportional to energy and can be express as &amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039; E = hv &#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
where E is energy, h is Planck&#039;s constant ( 6.62607*10^-34J) and v is frequency&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
f = 1/T&lt;br /&gt;
f = w/2pi----(Units Hertz)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Wavelength&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wavelength is the distance between crests in meters. Wavelength is equal to the speed of light times frequency. Longer wavelength waves such as radio waves carry low energy; this is why we can listen to the radio without any harmful consequences. Shorter wavelength waves such as x-rays carry higher energy that can be hazardous to our health. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:shortlongwavelength.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Wavelength and Frequency&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The speed of light is the multiplication of the wavelength and frequency. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;c=λν &#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:visible_EM_modes.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This diagram shows all properties of waves:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:wave_props.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;ENERGY FLUX&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is defined by the following equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         S = (1/u0)*(E x B) in W/m^2&lt;br /&gt;
         where B = E/c&lt;br /&gt;
         where c = speed of light&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:energy_flux.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness: X-Rays==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic Radiation while commonly thought of as only including visible light, radio waves, UV waves, and gamma rays; also include X-rays. In 1895, X-rays were initially discovered by William Roentgen, who accidentally fell upon the most important discovery about his life (Figure 1). Roentgen was already working on cathode rays, and because of a fluorescent glow that occurred during his experiments, covered his experimental apparatus with heavy black paper. However, when he did this, he discovered a glow coming from a screen several feet away. Through many more experiments, he discovered that a new type of energy, not cathode rays, were the cause of the glow. He named them “x-rays” and received the 1901 Nobel Prize in Physics. Roentgen never patented his monumental discovery and as a result, numerous researchers set out to find a multitude of uses and capitalize on his work.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Primarily, people could now view objects that were hidden from plain view (i.e. scanners in airports). While X-rays are now used in 100’s of professions (security, chemistry, art galleries), its most important function is to view bones to determine abnormalities in humans. In fact, one of Roentgen’s first x-rays was of his wife’s hand (Figure 2). X-rays fall under the scope of electromagnetic radiation because, like all E.R. waves, it is comprised of photons. X-rays have wavelengths between 0.01 to 10 nanometers and fall between UV and Gamma Waves on the E.R. spectrum (Figure 3).&lt;br /&gt;
There are two main methods in which an x-ray may be formed. Both require a vacuum-filled tube called an x-ray tube (Figure 4). With an anode on one end and a cathode on the other, an electric current is applied and a high energy electron is projected from the cathode, through the vacuum, and at the anode. In the characteristic x-ray generation approach, the electron from the cathode  collides with an inner shell electron on an atom on the anode (Figure 5). Both of these electrons are ejected from the atom and an outer shell electron takes the place of the inner shell one. Because the outer electron must have a lower energy to fill the inner shell hole, it releases a photon with the equivalent energy of the difference between the two energy levels in the atom. This photon is the x-ray that is used to view objects such as bones.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the Bremsstrahlung x-ray generation method, the electron from the cathode is slowed as it passes the nucleus of an atom at the anode (Figure 6). As it slows and its path is changed, the loses energy (kinetic energy). This energy is also released as a photon which is subsequently called an x-ray. &lt;br /&gt;
Depending on the voltage and current of the tube and the material of the anode, different types (as in wavelengths and energy) of x-rays can be produced and each one. However, all X-rays will continue to pass through objects until it reaches a material dense that stops it. However, density of the material required depends on the energy of the x-ray. For example, during a medical x-ray, x-rays of a certain energy will pass through soft tissue (skin, organs, etc) but not through bones. The x-rays that pass through the soft tissue will strike the screen and the absence of the x-rays absorbed by the bones will cause a negative space on the screen. The areas where x-rays do not strike will form the image of the bone. While the principles remain the same, x-ray machines today use incredible sophisticated technology to specify the type of x-ray they want and have greatly increased in accuracy since Roentgen’s initial discovery.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_1.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 2:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_2.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 3:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_3.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 4:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_4.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 5:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_5.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 6:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_6.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Information and photographs are pulled from references 1 through 5 cited below*&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Already, during the Ancient Greek and Roman times, light was studied as the presence of deflection and refraction were noticed. &lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic radiation of wavelengths in the early 19th century. The discovery of infrared radiation is ascribed to astronomer William Herschel, who published his results in 1800 before the Royal Society of London. Herschel used a glass Triangular prism (optics)|prism to refract light from the Sun and detected invisible rays that caused heating beyond the red part of the spectrum, through an increase in the temperature recorded with a thermometer. These &amp;quot;calorific rays&amp;quot; were later termed infrared.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1801, Rohann Ritter, discovered the presence of ultraviolet light using salts. It was known that light could darken some silver halides and while doing so, he realized that the region beyond the violet bar (therefore ultraviolet) was more effective in changing the color of the halides. &lt;br /&gt;
However,in 1864, while summarizing the theories of his time accumulating into his famous set of Maxwell equations, James Clerk Maxwell managed to deduce the speed of light being around 3e8 meters per second. This was instrumental in creating the rest of the spectrum. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1887-1888 Physicist Heinrich Hertz not only tried to measure the velocity and frequency of electromagnetic radiation waves at other parts of the known spectrum of the time, but he was also able to prove that Maxwell&#039;s findings were correct. He did this on the microwave radiation as well. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The discovery of X-rays occurred in 1895 by Wilhelm Rontgen when his barium platinocyanide detector screen began to glow under the presence of a discharge that passed through a cathode ray tube although the latter was completely covered. Once he determined its possible use, he tried to look at his wife&#039;s hand using this new discovery. However x-ray spectroscopy was not institutionalized until later by Karl Manne Siegbahn. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1900, Paul Villard discovered Gamma rays although he initially thought that they were particles similar to alpha and beta particles which were emitted during radiation. These &#039;particles&#039; were later proven to be part of the electromagnetic spectrum. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
1. Elert, Glenn. &amp;quot;X-rays.&amp;quot; X-rays – The Physics Hypertextbook. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Apr. 2017. &lt;br /&gt;
http://physics.info/x-ray/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.&amp;quot;X-rays.&amp;quot; X-rays. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Apr. 2017. http://www.physics.isu.edu/radinf/xray.htm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. &amp;quot;Basics of X-ray PhysicsX-ray production.&amp;quot; Welcome to Radiology Masterclass. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Apr. 2017. http://www.radiologymasterclass.co.uk/tutorials/physics/x-ray_physics_production#top_2nd_img&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. &amp;quot;X-Rays.&amp;quot; Image: Electromagnetic Spectrum. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Apr. 2017. https://www.boundless.com/physics/textbooks/boundless-physics-textbook/electromagnetic-waves-23/the-electromagnetic-spectrum-165/x-rays-597-11175/images/electromagnetic-spectrum/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. &amp;quot;This Month in Physics History.&amp;quot; American Physical Society. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Apr. 2017. https://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/200111/history.cfm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. Editors, Spectroscopy. “The Electromagnetic Spectrum: A History.” Spectroscopy Home, 27 Oct. 2017, www.spectroscopyonline.com/electromagnetic-spectrum-history?id=&amp;amp;sk=&amp;amp;date=&amp;amp;&amp;amp;pageID=4.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Samigues3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electromagnetic_Radiation&amp;diff=29500</id>
		<title>Electromagnetic Radiation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electromagnetic_Radiation&amp;diff=29500"/>
		<updated>2017-11-25T04:36:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Samigues3: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Claimed by Carlos Fernandez to edit (Spring 2016) &#039;&#039;&#039;Claimed by Sungyoung Joo(FALL 2016)&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;quot;&#039;Claimed by Monali Shah to edit (Spring 2017)&lt;br /&gt;
Edited by Solange Amigues&lt;br /&gt;
==Electromagnetic Radiation==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===What is a Electromagnetic(EM) Radiation?===&lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic radiation is a form of energy that is all around us and takes many forms, such as radio waves, microwaves, infrared, visible light, ultraviolet, x-rays, and gamma rays. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before 1873, electricity and magnetism were thought to be two different forces. However, in 1873, Scottish Physicist James Maxwell developed his famous theory of electromagnetism. There are four main electro magnetic interactions according to Maxwell:&lt;br /&gt;
* The force of attraction or repulsion between electric charges is inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them&lt;br /&gt;
* Magnetic poles come in pairs that attract and repel each other much as electric charges do&lt;br /&gt;
* An electric current in a wire produces a magnetic field whose direction depends on the direction of the current&lt;br /&gt;
* A moving electric field produces a magnetic field, and vice versa&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The four Maxwell&#039;s Equations provide a complete description of possible spatial patterns of electric and magnetic field in space. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Ampere-Maxwell Law]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gauss&#039;s Law]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Faraday&#039;s Law]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other than Maxwell&#039;s Four equations, there are general properties of all electromagnetic radiation:&lt;br /&gt;
* Electromagnetic radiation can travel through empty space. Most other types of waves must travel through some sort of substance. For example, sound waves need either a gas, solid, or liquid to pass through in order to be heard&lt;br /&gt;
* The speed of light is always a constant (3 x 10^8 m/s)&lt;br /&gt;
* Wavelengths are measured between the distances of either crests or troughs. It is usually characterized by the Greek symbol λ (gamma).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic waves are the self-propagating, mutual oscillation of electric and magnetic fields. The propagation of electromagnetic energy is often referred to as radiation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The EM Spectrum==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
EM spectrum is a span of enormous range of wavelengths and frequencies. The EM spectrum is generally divided into 7 different regions, in order of decreasing wavelength and increasing energy and frequency. It ranges from Gamma rays to Long Radio Waves. Following are the lists of waves:&lt;br /&gt;
* Gamma rays&lt;br /&gt;
* X-rays&lt;br /&gt;
* UV rays&lt;br /&gt;
* Visible Light&lt;br /&gt;
* Infrared Rays&lt;br /&gt;
* Microwave&lt;br /&gt;
* Radio, TV&lt;br /&gt;
* Long radio waves&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:em-spectrum.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although all these waves do different things, there is one thing in common : They all travel in waves.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:spectrum_Properties.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Infrared radiation&#039;&#039;&#039; can be released as heat or thermal energy. It can also be bounced back, which is called near infrared because of its similarities with visible light energy. Infrared Radiation is most commonly used in remote sensing as infrared sensors collect thermal energy, providing us with weather conditions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:pic_snap_girl.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Visible Light&#039;&#039;&#039; is the only part of the electromagnetic spectrum that humans can see with a naked eye. This part of the spectrum includes a range of different colors that all represent a particular wavelength. Rainbows are formed in this way; light passes through matter in which it is absorbed or reflected based on its wavelength. As a result, some colors are reflected more than other, leading to the creation of a rainbow.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:pyramid123.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:rainbow.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Waves and Fields==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As we learned in class, electric field is produced when an electron is accelerating. Likewise, EM radiation is created when an atomic particle, like an electron, is accelerated by an electric field. The movement like this produces oscillating electric and magnetic fields, which travel at right angles to each other in a bundle of light energy called a photon. Photons travel in a harmonic wave at the fastest speed possible in the universe. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:waves image.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic waves are formed when an electric field couples with a magnetic field. Magnetic and electric fields of an electromagnetic wave are perpendicular to each other and to the direction of the wave. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A wavelength (in m) is the distance between two consecutive peaks of a wave. Frequency is the number of waves that form in a given length of time. A wavelength and frequency are interrelated. A short wavelength indicates that the frequency will be higher because one cycle can pass in a shorter amount of time. Likewise, a longer wavelength has a lower frequency because each cycle takes longer to complete.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:waves_1.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Waves can be classified according to their nature:&lt;br /&gt;
* Mechanical waves&lt;br /&gt;
* Electromagnetic waves&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Mechanical Waves&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mechanical waves require a medium (matter) to travel through. &lt;br /&gt;
Examples are sound waves, water waves, ripples in strings or springs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Water Waves&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:waterwaves.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Sound Waves&#039;&#039;  &lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:loudspeaker-waveform.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electromagnetic Waves&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic waves do not require a medium (matter) to travel through - they can travel through space.&lt;br /&gt;
Examples are radio waves, visible light, x-rays.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;X-RAYS&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:x-rays.jpeg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Radio Waves&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:facts-about-radio-waves.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Visible Lights&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:visible-spectrum123.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==A Mathematical Model==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The position of the particle is defined by a sine wave:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;y = ymaxsin(wt)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
         Where w is the angular frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Amplitude&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Amplitude is the distance from the maximum vertical displacement of the wave to the middle of the wave. The Amplitude of the sinusoidal Wave is the height of the peak in the wave measured from the zero line. This measures the magnitude of oscillation of a particular wave. The Amplitude is important because it tells you the intensity or brightness of a wave in comparison with other waves.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Period&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The period of the wave is the time between crests in seconds(s).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
T = 2pi/w-----(units of seconds)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Frequency&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Frequency is the number of cycles per second, and is expressed as sec-1 or Hertz(Hz). Frequency is directly proportional to energy and can be express as &amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039; E = hv &#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
where E is energy, h is Planck&#039;s constant ( 6.62607*10^-34J) and v is frequency&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
f = 1/T&lt;br /&gt;
f = w/2pi----(Units Hertz)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Wavelength&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wavelength is the distance between crests in meters. Wavelength is equal to the speed of light times frequency. Longer wavelength waves such as radio waves carry low energy; this is why we can listen to the radio without any harmful consequences. Shorter wavelength waves such as x-rays carry higher energy that can be hazardous to our health. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:shortlongwavelength.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Wavelength and Frequency&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The speed of light is the multiplication of the wavelength and frequency. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;c=λν &#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:visible_EM_modes.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This diagram shows all properties of waves:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:wave_props.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;ENERGY FLUX&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is defined by the following equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         S = (1/u0)*(E x B) in W/m^2&lt;br /&gt;
         where B = E/c&lt;br /&gt;
         where c = speed of light&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:energy_flux.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness: X-Rays==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic Radiation while commonly thought of as only including visible light, radio waves, UV waves, and gamma rays; also include X-rays. In 1895, X-rays were initially discovered by William Roentgen, who accidentally fell upon the most important discovery about his life (Figure 1). Roentgen was already working on cathode rays, and because of a fluorescent glow that occurred during his experiments, covered his experimental apparatus with heavy black paper. However, when he did this, he discovered a glow coming from a screen several feet away. Through many more experiments, he discovered that a new type of energy, not cathode rays, were the cause of the glow. He named them “x-rays” and received the 1901 Nobel Prize in Physics. Roentgen never patented his monumental discovery and as a result, numerous researchers set out to find a multitude of uses and capitalize on his work.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Primarily, people could now view objects that were hidden from plain view (i.e. scanners in airports). While X-rays are now used in 100’s of professions (security, chemistry, art galleries), its most important function is to view bones to determine abnormalities in humans. In fact, one of Roentgen’s first x-rays was of his wife’s hand (Figure 2). X-rays fall under the scope of electromagnetic radiation because, like all E.R. waves, it is comprised of photons. X-rays have wavelengths between 0.01 to 10 nanometers and fall between UV and Gamma Waves on the E.R. spectrum (Figure 3).&lt;br /&gt;
There are two main methods in which an x-ray may be formed. Both require a vacuum-filled tube called an x-ray tube (Figure 4). With an anode on one end and a cathode on the other, an electric current is applied and a high energy electron is projected from the cathode, through the vacuum, and at the anode. In the characteristic x-ray generation approach, the electron from the cathode  collides with an inner shell electron on an atom on the anode (Figure 5). Both of these electrons are ejected from the atom and an outer shell electron takes the place of the inner shell one. Because the outer electron must have a lower energy to fill the inner shell hole, it releases a photon with the equivalent energy of the difference between the two energy levels in the atom. This photon is the x-ray that is used to view objects such as bones.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the Bremsstrahlung x-ray generation method, the electron from the cathode is slowed as it passes the nucleus of an atom at the anode (Figure 6). As it slows and its path is changed, the loses energy (kinetic energy). This energy is also released as a photon which is subsequently called an x-ray. &lt;br /&gt;
Depending on the voltage and current of the tube and the material of the anode, different types (as in wavelengths and energy) of x-rays can be produced and each one. However, all X-rays will continue to pass through objects until it reaches a material dense that stops it. However, density of the material required depends on the energy of the x-ray. For example, during a medical x-ray, x-rays of a certain energy will pass through soft tissue (skin, organs, etc) but not through bones. The x-rays that pass through the soft tissue will strike the screen and the absence of the x-rays absorbed by the bones will cause a negative space on the screen. The areas where x-rays do not strike will form the image of the bone. While the principles remain the same, x-ray machines today use incredible sophisticated technology to specify the type of x-ray they want and have greatly increased in accuracy since Roentgen’s initial discovery.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_1.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 2:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_2.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 3:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_3.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 4:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_4.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 5:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_5.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 6:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_6.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Information and photographs are pulled from references 1 through 5 cited below*&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Already, during the Ancient Greek and Roman times, light was studied as the presence of deflection and refraction were noticed. &lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic radiation of wavelengths in the early 19th century. The discovery of infrared radiation is ascribed to astronomer William Herschel, who published his results in 1800 before the Royal Society of London. Herschel used a glass Triangular prism (optics)|prism to refract light from the Sun and detected invisible rays that caused heating beyond the red part of the spectrum, through an increase in the temperature recorded with a thermometer. These &amp;quot;calorific rays&amp;quot; were later termed infrared.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1801, Rohann Ritter, discovered the presence of ultraviolet light using salts. It was known that light could darken some silver halides and while doing so, he realized that the region beyond the violet bar (therefore ultraviolet) was more effective in changing the color of the halides. &lt;br /&gt;
However,in 1864, while summarizing the theories of his time accumulating into his famous set of Maxwell equations, James Clerk Maxwell managed to deduce the speed of light being around 3e8 meters per second. This was instrumental in creating the rest of the spectrum. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1887-1888 Physicist Heinrich Hertz not only tried to measure the velocity and frequency of electromagnetic radiation waves at other parts of the known spectrum of the time, but he was also able to prove that Maxwell&#039;s findings were correct. He did this on the microwave radiation as well. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The discovery of X-rays occurred in 1895 by Wilhelm Rontgen when his barium platinocyanide detector screen began to glow under the presence of a discharge that passed through a cathode ray tube although the latter was completely covered. Once he determined its possible use, he tried to look at his wife&#039;s hand using this new discovery. However x-ray spectroscopy was not institutionalized until later by Karl Manne Siegbahn. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1900, Paul Villard discovered Gamma rays although he initially thought that they were particles similar to alpha and beta particles which were emitted during radiation. These &#039;particles&#039; were later proven to be part of the electromagnetic spectrum. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
1. Elert, Glenn. &amp;quot;X-rays.&amp;quot; X-rays – The Physics Hypertextbook. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Apr. 2017. &lt;br /&gt;
http://physics.info/x-ray/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.&amp;quot;X-rays.&amp;quot; X-rays. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Apr. 2017. http://www.physics.isu.edu/radinf/xray.htm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. &amp;quot;Basics of X-ray PhysicsX-ray production.&amp;quot; Welcome to Radiology Masterclass. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Apr. 2017. http://www.radiologymasterclass.co.uk/tutorials/physics/x-ray_physics_production#top_2nd_img&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. &amp;quot;X-Rays.&amp;quot; Image: Electromagnetic Spectrum. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Apr. 2017. https://www.boundless.com/physics/textbooks/boundless-physics-textbook/electromagnetic-waves-23/the-electromagnetic-spectrum-165/x-rays-597-11175/images/electromagnetic-spectrum/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. &amp;quot;This Month in Physics History.&amp;quot; American Physical Society. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Apr. 2017. https://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/200111/history.cfm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. Editors, Spectroscopy. “The Electromagnetic Spectrum: A History.” Spectroscopy Home, 27 Oct. 2017, www.spectroscopyonline.com/electromagnetic-spectrum-history?id=&amp;amp;sk=&amp;amp;date=&amp;amp;&amp;amp;pageID=4.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Samigues3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electromagnetic_Radiation&amp;diff=29499</id>
		<title>Electromagnetic Radiation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electromagnetic_Radiation&amp;diff=29499"/>
		<updated>2017-11-25T04:33:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Samigues3: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Claimed by Carlos Fernandez to edit (Spring 2016) &#039;&#039;&#039;Claimed by Sungyoung Joo(FALL 2016)&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;quot;&#039;Claimed by Monali Shah to edit (Spring 2017)&lt;br /&gt;
Edited by Solange Amigues&lt;br /&gt;
==Electromagnetic Radiation==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===What is a Electromagnetic(EM) Radiation?===&lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic radiation is a form of energy that is all around us and takes many forms, such as radio waves, microwaves, infrared, visible light, ultraviolet, x-rays, and gamma rays. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before 1873, electricity and magnetism were thought to be two different forces. However, in 1873, Scottish Physicist James Maxwell developed his famous theory of electromagnetism. There are four main electro magnetic interactions according to Maxwell:&lt;br /&gt;
* The force of attraction or repulsion between electric charges is inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them&lt;br /&gt;
* Magnetic poles come in pairs that attract and repel each other much as electric charges do&lt;br /&gt;
* An electric current in a wire produces a magnetic field whose direction depends on the direction of the current&lt;br /&gt;
* A moving electric field produces a magnetic field, and vice versa&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The four Maxwell&#039;s Equations provide a complete description of possible spatial patterns of electric and magnetic field in space. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Ampere-Maxwell Law]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gauss&#039;s Law]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Faraday&#039;s Law]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other than Maxwell&#039;s Four equations, there are general properties of all electromagnetic radiation:&lt;br /&gt;
* Electromagnetic radiation can travel through empty space. Most other types of waves must travel through some sort of substance. For example, sound waves need either a gas, solid, or liquid to pass through in order to be heard&lt;br /&gt;
* The speed of light is always a constant (3 x 10^8 m/s)&lt;br /&gt;
* Wavelengths are measured between the distances of either crests or troughs. It is usually characterized by the Greek symbol λ (gamma).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic waves are the self-propagating, mutual oscillation of electric and magnetic fields. The propagation of electromagnetic energy is often referred to as radiation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The EM Spectrum==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
EM spectrum is a span of enormous range of wavelengths and frequencies. The EM spectrum is generally divided into 7 different regions, in order of decreasing wavelength and increasing energy and frequency. It ranges from Gamma rays to Long Radio Waves. Following are the lists of waves:&lt;br /&gt;
* Gamma rays&lt;br /&gt;
* X-rays&lt;br /&gt;
* UV rays&lt;br /&gt;
* Visible Light&lt;br /&gt;
* Infrared Rays&lt;br /&gt;
* Microwave&lt;br /&gt;
* Radio, TV&lt;br /&gt;
* Long radio waves&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:em-spectrum.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although all these waves do different things, there is one thing in common : They all travel in waves.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:spectrum_Properties.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Infrared radiation&#039;&#039;&#039; can be released as heat or thermal energy. It can also be bounced back, which is called near infrared because of its similarities with visible light energy. Infrared Radiation is most commonly used in remote sensing as infrared sensors collect thermal energy, providing us with weather conditions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:pic_snap_girl.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Visible Light&#039;&#039;&#039; is the only part of the electromagnetic spectrum that humans can see with a naked eye. This part of the spectrum includes a range of different colors that all represent a particular wavelength. Rainbows are formed in this way; light passes through matter in which it is absorbed or reflected based on its wavelength. As a result, some colors are reflected more than other, leading to the creation of a rainbow.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:pyramid123.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:rainbow.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Waves and Fields==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As we learned in class, electric field is produced when an electron is accelerating. Likewise, EM radiation is created when an atomic particle, like an electron, is accelerated by an electric field. The movement like this produces oscillating electric and magnetic fields, which travel at right angles to each other in a bundle of light energy called a photon. Photons travel in a harmonic wave at the fastest speed possible in the universe. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:waves image.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic waves are formed when an electric field couples with a magnetic field. Magnetic and electric fields of an electromagnetic wave are perpendicular to each other and to the direction of the wave. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A wavelength (in m) is the distance between two consecutive peaks of a wave. Frequency is the number of waves that form in a given length of time. A wavelength and frequency are interrelated. A short wavelength indicates that the frequency will be higher because one cycle can pass in a shorter amount of time. Likewise, a longer wavelength has a lower frequency because each cycle takes longer to complete.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:waves_1.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Waves can be classified according to their nature:&lt;br /&gt;
* Mechanical waves&lt;br /&gt;
* Electromagnetic waves&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Mechanical Waves&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mechanical waves require a medium (matter) to travel through. &lt;br /&gt;
Examples are sound waves, water waves, ripples in strings or springs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Water Waves&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:waterwaves.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Sound Waves&#039;&#039;  &lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:loudspeaker-waveform.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electromagnetic Waves&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic waves do not require a medium (matter) to travel through - they can travel through space.&lt;br /&gt;
Examples are radio waves, visible light, x-rays.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;X-RAYS&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:x-rays.jpeg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Radio Waves&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:facts-about-radio-waves.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Visible Lights&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:visible-spectrum123.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==A Mathematical Model==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The position of the particle is defined by a sine wave:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;y = ymaxsin(wt)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
         Where w is the angular frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Amplitude&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Amplitude is the distance from the maximum vertical displacement of the wave to the middle of the wave. The Amplitude of the sinusoidal Wave is the height of the peak in the wave measured from the zero line. This measures the magnitude of oscillation of a particular wave. The Amplitude is important because it tells you the intensity or brightness of a wave in comparison with other waves.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Period&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The period of the wave is the time between crests in seconds(s).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
T = 2pi/w-----(units of seconds)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Frequency&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Frequency is the number of cycles per second, and is expressed as sec-1 or Hertz(Hz). Frequency is directly proportional to energy and can be express as &amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039; E = hv &#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
where E is energy, h is Planck&#039;s constant ( 6.62607*10^-34J) and v is frequency&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
f = 1/T&lt;br /&gt;
f = w/2pi----(Units Hertz)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Wavelength&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wavelength is the distance between crests in meters. Wavelength is equal to the speed of light times frequency. Longer wavelength waves such as radio waves carry low energy; this is why we can listen to the radio without any harmful consequences. Shorter wavelength waves such as x-rays carry higher energy that can be hazardous to our health. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:shortlongwavelength.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Wavelength and Frequency&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The speed of light is the multiplication of the wavelength and frequency. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;c=λν &#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:visible_EM_modes.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This diagram shows all properties of waves:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:wave_props.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;ENERGY FLUX&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is defined by the following equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         S = (1/u0)*(E x B) in W/m^2&lt;br /&gt;
         where B = E/c&lt;br /&gt;
         where c = speed of light&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:energy_flux.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness: X-Rays==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic Radiation while commonly thought of as only including visible light, radio waves, UV waves, and gamma rays; also include X-rays. In 1895, X-rays were initially discovered by William Roentgen, who accidentally fell upon the most important discovery about his life (Figure 1). Roentgen was already working on cathode rays, and because of a fluorescent glow that occurred during his experiments, covered his experimental apparatus with heavy black paper. However, when he did this, he discovered a glow coming from a screen several feet away. Through many more experiments, he discovered that a new type of energy, not cathode rays, were the cause of the glow. He named them “x-rays” and received the 1901 Nobel Prize in Physics. Roentgen never patented his monumental discovery and as a result, numerous researchers set out to find a multitude of uses and capitalize on his work.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Primarily, people could now view objects that were hidden from plain view (i.e. scanners in airports). While X-rays are now used in 100’s of professions (security, chemistry, art galleries), its most important function is to view bones to determine abnormalities in humans. In fact, one of Roentgen’s first x-rays was of his wife’s hand (Figure 2). X-rays fall under the scope of electromagnetic radiation because, like all E.R. waves, it is comprised of photons. X-rays have wavelengths between 0.01 to 10 nanometers and fall between UV and Gamma Waves on the E.R. spectrum (Figure 3).&lt;br /&gt;
There are two main methods in which an x-ray may be formed. Both require a vacuum-filled tube called an x-ray tube (Figure 4). With an anode on one end and a cathode on the other, an electric current is applied and a high energy electron is projected from the cathode, through the vacuum, and at the anode. In the characteristic x-ray generation approach, the electron from the cathode  collides with an inner shell electron on an atom on the anode (Figure 5). Both of these electrons are ejected from the atom and an outer shell electron takes the place of the inner shell one. Because the outer electron must have a lower energy to fill the inner shell hole, it releases a photon with the equivalent energy of the difference between the two energy levels in the atom. This photon is the x-ray that is used to view objects such as bones.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the Bremsstrahlung x-ray generation method, the electron from the cathode is slowed as it passes the nucleus of an atom at the anode (Figure 6). As it slows and its path is changed, the loses energy (kinetic energy). This energy is also released as a photon which is subsequently called an x-ray. &lt;br /&gt;
Depending on the voltage and current of the tube and the material of the anode, different types (as in wavelengths and energy) of x-rays can be produced and each one. However, all X-rays will continue to pass through objects until it reaches a material dense that stops it. However, density of the material required depends on the energy of the x-ray. For example, during a medical x-ray, x-rays of a certain energy will pass through soft tissue (skin, organs, etc) but not through bones. The x-rays that pass through the soft tissue will strike the screen and the absence of the x-rays absorbed by the bones will cause a negative space on the screen. The areas where x-rays do not strike will form the image of the bone. While the principles remain the same, x-ray machines today use incredible sophisticated technology to specify the type of x-ray they want and have greatly increased in accuracy since Roentgen’s initial discovery.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_1.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 2:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_2.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 3:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_3.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 4:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_4.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 5:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_5.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 6:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_6.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Information and photographs are pulled from references 1 through 5 cited below*&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Already, during the Ancient Greek and Roman times, light was studied as the presence of deflection and refraction were noticed. &lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic radiation of wavelengths in the early 19th century. The discovery of infrared radiation is ascribed to astronomer William Herschel, who published his results in 1800 before the Royal Society of London. Herschel used a glass Triangular prism (optics)|prism to refract light from the Sun and detected invisible rays that caused heating beyond the red part of the spectrum, through an increase in the temperature recorded with a thermometer. These &amp;quot;calorific rays&amp;quot; were later termed infrared.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1801, Rohann Ritter, discovered the presence of ultraviolet light using salts. It was known that light could darken some silver halides and while doing so, he realized that the region beyond the violet bar (therefore ultraviolet) was more effective in changing the color of the halides. &lt;br /&gt;
However,in 1864, while summarizing the theories of his time accumulating into his famous set of Maxwell equations, James Clerk Maxwell managed to deduce the speed of light being around 3e8 meters per second. This was instrumental in creating the rest of the spectrum. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1887-1888 Physicist Heinrich Hertz not only tried to measure the velocity and frequency of electromagnetic radiation waves at other parts of the known spectrum of the time, but he was also able to prove that Maxwell&#039;s findings were correct. He did this on the microwave radiation as well. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The discovery of X-rays occurred in 1895 by Wilhelm Rontgen when his barium platinocyanide detector screen began to glow under the presence of a discharge that passed through a cathode ray tube although the latter was completely covered. Once he determined its possible use, he tried to look at his wife&#039;s hand using this new discovery. However x-ray spectroscopy was not institutionalized until later by Karl Manne Siegbahn. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1900, Paul Villard discovered Gamma rays although he initially thought that they were particles similar to alpha and beta particles which were emitted during radiation. These &#039;particles&#039; were later proven to be part of the electromagnetic spectrum. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
1. Elert, Glenn. &amp;quot;X-rays.&amp;quot; X-rays – The Physics Hypertextbook. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Apr. 2017. &lt;br /&gt;
http://physics.info/x-ray/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.&amp;quot;X-rays.&amp;quot; X-rays. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Apr. 2017. http://www.physics.isu.edu/radinf/xray.htm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. &amp;quot;Basics of X-ray PhysicsX-ray production.&amp;quot; Welcome to Radiology Masterclass. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Apr. 2017. http://www.radiologymasterclass.co.uk/tutorials/physics/x-ray_physics_production#top_2nd_img&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. &amp;quot;X-Rays.&amp;quot; Image: Electromagnetic Spectrum. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Apr. 2017. https://www.boundless.com/physics/textbooks/boundless-physics-textbook/electromagnetic-waves-23/the-electromagnetic-spectrum-165/x-rays-597-11175/images/electromagnetic-spectrum/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. &amp;quot;This Month in Physics History.&amp;quot; American Physical Society. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Apr. 2017. https://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/200111/history.cfm&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Samigues3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electromagnetic_Radiation&amp;diff=29498</id>
		<title>Electromagnetic Radiation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Electromagnetic_Radiation&amp;diff=29498"/>
		<updated>2017-11-25T03:58:55Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Samigues3: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Claimed by Carlos Fernandez to edit (Spring 2016) &#039;&#039;&#039;Claimed by Sungyoung Joo(FALL 2016)&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;quot;&#039;Claimed by Monali Shah to edit (Spring 2017)&lt;br /&gt;
Edited by Solange Amigues&lt;br /&gt;
==Electromagnetic Radiation==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===What is a Electromagnetic(EM) Radiation?===&lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic radiation is a form of energy that is all around us and takes many forms, such as radio waves, microwaves, infrared, visible light, ultraviolet, x-rays, and gamma rays. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before 1873, electricity and magnetism were thought to be two different forces. However, in 1873, Scottish Physicist James Maxwell developed his famous theory of electromagnetism. There are four main electro magnetic interactions according to Maxwell:&lt;br /&gt;
* The force of attraction or repulsion between electric charges is inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them&lt;br /&gt;
* Magnetic poles come in pairs that attract and repel each other much as electric charges do&lt;br /&gt;
* An electric current in a wire produces a magnetic field whose direction depends on the direction of the current&lt;br /&gt;
* A moving electric field produces a magnetic field, and vice versa&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The four Maxwell&#039;s Equations provide a complete description of possible spatial patterns of electric and magnetic field in space. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Ampere-Maxwell Law]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gauss&#039;s Law]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Faraday&#039;s Law]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other than Maxwell&#039;s Four equations, there are general properties of all electromagnetic radiation:&lt;br /&gt;
* Electromagnetic radiation can travel through empty space. Most other types of waves must travel through some sort of substance. For example, sound waves need either a gas, solid, or liquid to pass through in order to be heard&lt;br /&gt;
* The speed of light is always a constant (3 x 10^8 m/s)&lt;br /&gt;
* Wavelengths are measured between the distances of either crests or troughs. It is usually characterized by the Greek symbol λ (gamma).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic waves are the self-propagating, mutual oscillation of electric and magnetic fields. The propagation of electromagnetic energy is often referred to as radiation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The EM Spectrum==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
EM spectrum is a span of enormous range of wavelengths and frequencies. The EM spectrum is generally divided into 7 different regions, in order of decreasing wavelength and increasing energy and frequency. It ranges from Gamma rays to Long Radio Waves. Following are the lists of waves:&lt;br /&gt;
* Gamma rays&lt;br /&gt;
* X-rays&lt;br /&gt;
* UV rays&lt;br /&gt;
* Visible Light&lt;br /&gt;
* Infrared Rays&lt;br /&gt;
* Microwave&lt;br /&gt;
* Radio, TV&lt;br /&gt;
* Long radio waves&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:em-spectrum.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although all these waves do different things, there is one thing in common : They all travel in waves.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:spectrum_Properties.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Infrared radiation&#039;&#039;&#039; can be released as heat or thermal energy. It can also be bounced back, which is called near infrared because of its similarities with visible light energy. Infrared Radiation is most commonly used in remote sensing as infrared sensors collect thermal energy, providing us with weather conditions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:pic_snap_girl.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Visible Light&#039;&#039;&#039; is the only part of the electromagnetic spectrum that humans can see with a naked eye. This part of the spectrum includes a range of different colors that all represent a particular wavelength. Rainbows are formed in this way; light passes through matter in which it is absorbed or reflected based on its wavelength. As a result, some colors are reflected more than other, leading to the creation of a rainbow.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:pyramid123.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:rainbow.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Waves and Fields==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As we learned in class, electric field is produced when an electron is accelerating. Likewise, EM radiation is created when an atomic particle, like an electron, is accelerated by an electric field. The movement like this produces oscillating electric and magnetic fields, which travel at right angles to each other in a bundle of light energy called a photon. Photons travel in a harmonic wave at the fastest speed possible in the universe. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:waves image.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic waves are formed when an electric field couples with a magnetic field. Magnetic and electric fields of an electromagnetic wave are perpendicular to each other and to the direction of the wave. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A wavelength (in m) is the distance between two consecutive peaks of a wave. Frequency is the number of waves that form in a given length of time. A wavelength and frequency are interrelated. A short wavelength indicates that the frequency will be higher because one cycle can pass in a shorter amount of time. Likewise, a longer wavelength has a lower frequency because each cycle takes longer to complete.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:waves_1.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Waves can be classified according to their nature:&lt;br /&gt;
* Mechanical waves&lt;br /&gt;
* Electromagnetic waves&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Mechanical Waves&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mechanical waves require a medium (matter) to travel through. &lt;br /&gt;
Examples are sound waves, water waves, ripples in strings or springs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Water Waves&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:waterwaves.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Sound Waves&#039;&#039;  &lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:loudspeaker-waveform.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Electromagnetic Waves&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic waves do not require a medium (matter) to travel through - they can travel through space.&lt;br /&gt;
Examples are radio waves, visible light, x-rays.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;X-RAYS&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:x-rays.jpeg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Radio Waves&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:facts-about-radio-waves.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Visible Lights&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:visible-spectrum123.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==A Mathematical Model==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The position of the particle is defined by a sine wave:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;y = ymaxsin(wt)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
         Where w is the angular frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Amplitude&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Amplitude is the distance from the maximum vertical displacement of the wave to the middle of the wave. The Amplitude of the sinusoidal Wave is the height of the peak in the wave measured from the zero line. This measures the magnitude of oscillation of a particular wave. The Amplitude is important because it tells you the intensity or brightness of a wave in comparison with other waves.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Period&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The period of the wave is the time between crests in seconds(s).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
T = 2pi/w-----(units of seconds)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Frequency&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Frequency is the number of cycles per second, and is expressed as sec-1 or Hertz(Hz). Frequency is directly proportional to energy and can be express as &amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039; E = hv &#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
where E is energy, h is Planck&#039;s constant ( 6.62607*10^-34J) and v is frequency&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
f = 1/T&lt;br /&gt;
f = w/2pi----(Units Hertz)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Wavelength&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wavelength is the distance between crests in meters. Wavelength is equal to the speed of light times frequency. Longer wavelength waves such as radio waves carry low energy; this is why we can listen to the radio without any harmful consequences. Shorter wavelength waves such as x-rays carry higher energy that can be hazardous to our health. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:shortlongwavelength.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Wavelength and Frequency&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The speed of light is the multiplication of the wavelength and frequency. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;c=λν &#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:visible_EM_modes.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This diagram shows all properties of waves:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:wave_props.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;ENERGY FLUX&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is defined by the following equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         S = (1/u0)*(E x B) in W/m^2&lt;br /&gt;
         where B = E/c&lt;br /&gt;
         where c = speed of light&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  [[File:energy_flux.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness: X-Rays==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic Radiation while commonly thought of as only including visible light, radio waves, UV waves, and gamma rays; also include X-rays. In 1895, X-rays were initially discovered by William Roentgen, who accidentally fell upon the most important discovery about his life (Figure 1). Roentgen was already working on cathode rays, and because of a fluorescent glow that occurred during his experiments, covered his experimental apparatus with heavy black paper. However, when he did this, he discovered a glow coming from a screen several feet away. Through many more experiments, he discovered that a new type of energy, not cathode rays, were the cause of the glow. He named them “x-rays” and received the 1901 Nobel Prize in Physics. Roentgen never patented his monumental discovery and as a result, numerous researchers set out to find a multitude of uses and capitalize on his work.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Primarily, people could now view objects that were hidden from plain view (i.e. scanners in airports). While X-rays are now used in 100’s of professions (security, chemistry, art galleries), its most important function is to view bones to determine abnormalities in humans. In fact, one of Roentgen’s first x-rays was of his wife’s hand (Figure 2). X-rays fall under the scope of electromagnetic radiation because, like all E.R. waves, it is comprised of photons. X-rays have wavelengths between 0.01 to 10 nanometers and fall between UV and Gamma Waves on the E.R. spectrum (Figure 3).&lt;br /&gt;
There are two main methods in which an x-ray may be formed. Both require a vacuum-filled tube called an x-ray tube (Figure 4). With an anode on one end and a cathode on the other, an electric current is applied and a high energy electron is projected from the cathode, through the vacuum, and at the anode. In the characteristic x-ray generation approach, the electron from the cathode  collides with an inner shell electron on an atom on the anode (Figure 5). Both of these electrons are ejected from the atom and an outer shell electron takes the place of the inner shell one. Because the outer electron must have a lower energy to fill the inner shell hole, it releases a photon with the equivalent energy of the difference between the two energy levels in the atom. This photon is the x-ray that is used to view objects such as bones.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the Bremsstrahlung x-ray generation method, the electron from the cathode is slowed as it passes the nucleus of an atom at the anode (Figure 6). As it slows and its path is changed, the loses energy (kinetic energy). This energy is also released as a photon which is subsequently called an x-ray. &lt;br /&gt;
Depending on the voltage and current of the tube and the material of the anode, different types (as in wavelengths and energy) of x-rays can be produced and each one. However, all X-rays will continue to pass through objects until it reaches a material dense that stops it. However, density of the material required depends on the energy of the x-ray. For example, during a medical x-ray, x-rays of a certain energy will pass through soft tissue (skin, organs, etc) but not through bones. The x-rays that pass through the soft tissue will strike the screen and the absence of the x-rays absorbed by the bones will cause a negative space on the screen. The areas where x-rays do not strike will form the image of the bone. While the principles remain the same, x-ray machines today use incredible sophisticated technology to specify the type of x-ray they want and have greatly increased in accuracy since Roentgen’s initial discovery.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_1.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 2:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_2.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 3:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_3.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 4:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_4.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 5:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_5.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 6:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monali_Figure_6.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Information and photographs are pulled from references 1 through 5 cited below*&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Already, during the Ancient Greek and Roman times, light was studied as the presence of deflection and refraction were noticed. &lt;br /&gt;
Electromagnetic radiation of wavelengths in the early 19th century. The discovery of infrared radiation is ascribed to astronomer William Herschel, who published his results in 1800 before the Royal Society of London. Herschel used a glass Triangular prism (optics)|prism to refract light from the Sun and detected invisible rays that caused heating beyond the red part of the spectrum, through an increase in the temperature recorded with a thermometer. These &amp;quot;calorific rays&amp;quot; were later termed infrared.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1801, Rohann Ritter, discovered the presence of ultraviolet light using salts. It was known that light could darken some silver halides and while doing so, he realized that the region beyond the violet bar (therefore ultraviolet) was more effective in changing the color of the halides. &lt;br /&gt;
However,in 1864, while summarizing the theories of his time accumulating into his famous set of Maxwell equations, James Clerk Maxwell managed to deduce the speed of light being around 3e8 meters per second. This was instrumental in creating the rest of the spectrum. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
1. Elert, Glenn. &amp;quot;X-rays.&amp;quot; X-rays – The Physics Hypertextbook. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Apr. 2017. &lt;br /&gt;
http://physics.info/x-ray/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.&amp;quot;X-rays.&amp;quot; X-rays. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Apr. 2017. http://www.physics.isu.edu/radinf/xray.htm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. &amp;quot;Basics of X-ray PhysicsX-ray production.&amp;quot; Welcome to Radiology Masterclass. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Apr. 2017. http://www.radiologymasterclass.co.uk/tutorials/physics/x-ray_physics_production#top_2nd_img&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. &amp;quot;X-Rays.&amp;quot; Image: Electromagnetic Spectrum. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Apr. 2017. https://www.boundless.com/physics/textbooks/boundless-physics-textbook/electromagnetic-waves-23/the-electromagnetic-spectrum-165/x-rays-597-11175/images/electromagnetic-spectrum/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. &amp;quot;This Month in Physics History.&amp;quot; American Physical Society. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Apr. 2017. https://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/200111/history.cfm&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Samigues3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Motional_Emf_using_Faraday%27s_Law&amp;diff=29497</id>
		<title>Motional Emf using Faraday&#039;s Law</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Motional_Emf_using_Faraday%27s_Law&amp;diff=29497"/>
		<updated>2017-11-25T03:39:00Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Samigues3: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;CLAIMED BY: Kasey Cockerill (Fall 2016)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chelsea Calhoun&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Motional emf can be calculated in terms of magnetic flux, where motional emf is quantitatively equal to the rate of change of the magnetic flux. If an enclosed magnetic field remains constant but the loop changes shape or orientation, the resulting change in area leads to a change in magnetic flux.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When a wire moves through an area of magnetic field, a current begins to flow along the wire as a result of magnetic forces. Originally, we learned to calculate the motional emf in a moving bar by using the equation  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;{\frac{q(\vec{v} \times \vec{B})L}{q}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where v is the velocity of the bar and L is the bar length. However, there&#039;s an easier way to do this: by writing an equation for emf in terms of magnetic flux.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Motional emf results when the area enclosing a constant magnetic field changes. Let&#039;s observe a specific scenario in which a bar of length L slides along two frictionless bars. We can observe the change in area over a short time as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{A} = L\Delta{x} = Lv\Delta{t}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. We already know that magnetic flux is defined by the formula: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi_m = \int\! \vec{B} \cdot\vec{n}dA&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. In the case that v is perpendicular to B, we combine these to get: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{\Delta{\Phi_m}}{\Delta{t}} = BLv &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Emf is said to be the work done per unit charge: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;emf = \frac{FL}{q} = \frac{qvBL}{q} = vBL&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (again, we are assuming v is perpendicular to B).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Comparing the above two formulas, we can clearly see that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;|{emf}| = |\frac{d\Phi_m}{dt}|&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. This is exactly what Faraday&#039;s Law tells us!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Faraday&#039;s Law is defined as:  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;emf = \int\! \vec{E} \cdot d\vec{l} = -\frac{d}{dt} \int\! \vec{B} \cdot \vec{n}dA&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\vec{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the Non-Coulomb electric field along the path, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;l&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the length of the path you&#039;re integrating on, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\vec{B}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the magnetic field inside the area enclosed, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\vec{n}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the unit vector perpendicular to area A.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[File:ExamplePic1.jpg]]&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the image shown above, a bar of length &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;L&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is moving along two other bars from right to left. The blue circles containing &amp;quot;x&amp;quot;s represent a magnetic field directed into the page. As the bar moves to the right, the system encloses a greater amount of magnetic field. To explain this concept more clearly, take a look at the figures below. This image shows a bar moving in a magnetic field at two different times. In the first picture, at time &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, the system encircles half of two individual magnetic field circles. However, in the second picture taken at time &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t_2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, the system now encircles 6 full magnetic field circles. Of course, this explanation isn&#039;t using technical terms, but the point still stands: the enclosed magnetic field is increasing as time increases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[File:ExamplePic2.jpg]]&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Returning to the scenario in the first image, because the magnetic field is not constant, we can use Faraday&#039;s Law to solve for the motional emf.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As stated above, the formula is as follows: &amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;emf =  -\frac{d}{dt} \int\! \vec{B} \cdot \vec{n}dA&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, integrate the integral with respect to the area of the rectangle enclosed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;emf = -\frac{d}{dt} (\vec{B} \cdot \vec{n}A)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We have the dimensions of the bar in variables: length &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;L&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and width &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Substitute these values for the area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;emf = -\frac{d}{dt} (\vec{B} \cdot \vec{n}(L)(x))&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now that we have this formula, we have to figure out how to take its derivative with respect to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Which of the magnitudes of these values is changing? &lt;br /&gt;
:::The magnitude of the magnetic field is constant. (More &amp;quot;circles&amp;quot; are added as time increases, but the magnitude of each &amp;quot;circle&amp;quot; does not change.&lt;br /&gt;
:::The magnitude of the normal vector is constant.&lt;br /&gt;
:::The length, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;L&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, of the bar is constant.&lt;br /&gt;
:::The width of the surface enclosed, &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;&#039;changes&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the formula now becomes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;emf = (\vec{B} \cdot \vec{n}(L))\left(-\frac{d}{dt}(x)\right)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this case, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{dx}{dt} = \vec{v}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; because &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a function of time, where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\vec{v}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the velocity of the moving bar. Substituting that in, we get:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;emf = (\vec{B} \cdot \vec{n}(L))\vec{v}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in these values, we can solve for the motional emf of the bar.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because the magnetic field is changing with time, however, there is also an induced current flowing through the circuit. We can find the direction of the current using the right hand rule. To do this, we can use 2 different methods:&lt;br /&gt;
: &#039;&#039;&#039;1.&#039;&#039;&#039; We can use the equation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\vec{F} = q\vec{v} \times \vec{B}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\vec{F}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the force on the bar, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\vec{v}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the velocity of the bar. Using the right hand rule, we can point our fingers in the direction of the velocity of the bar and curl them in the direction of the magnetic field. The direction that our thumb points is the direction of the force on a positive charge. In this case, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\vec{F}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; points upward, so the positive charges in the bar will move to the top, causing it to polarize with positive charges at the top and negative charges at the bottom. We can now visualize the bar as a battery that causes a current &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; to run out of the positive end. In this case, since the bar is polarized with the positive charges at the top, the current will flow out of the top of the bar and continue around the circuit. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;2.&#039;&#039;&#039; We can use the negative direction of the change in magnetic field, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;-\frac{dB}{dt}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; to find the direction of the current. To do this, make a diagram comparing the magnitude of the magnetic field enclosed at time &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and at time &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t_2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Then, draw an arrow representing the direction of change of the magnetic field. Now, flip the arrow to take the negative of that vector&#039;s direction. Using the right hand rule, point your thumb in the direction of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;-\frac{dB}{dt}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and the curl of your fingers will give you the direction of the induced current, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If  the magnetic field is NOT constant, meaning it changes with time, the derivative &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{d}{dt}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; will be distributed to both &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\vec{B}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; in the formula. In this case, we must use the product rule to be able to set up the equation and continue solving for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;emf&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;emf = -(\frac{d}{dt} \vec{B})A \cdot B(\frac{d}{dt}A)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The B (dA/dt) can be replaced by BLv.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first term, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\frac{d}{dt}\vec{B})A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, represents Faraday&#039;s law and is nonzero of there is a varying magnetic field.&lt;br /&gt;
The second term, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;B(\frac{d}{dt}A)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, represents motional emf and is nonzero if there is a change in the amount of enclosed area.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the figure below, identify the following.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:a) Direction of magnetic field&lt;br /&gt;
:b) Direction of change in magnetic field, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{d\vec{B}}{dt}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:c) Direction of negative change in magnetic field, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;-\frac{d\vec{B}}{dt}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:d) Direction of current, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:e) Polarization of moving bar&lt;br /&gt;
:f) Direction of electric field inside bar due to polarization&lt;br /&gt;
:g) Direction of force on bar&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Example1.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
SOLUTION:&lt;br /&gt;
:a) Into the page&lt;br /&gt;
:: A circle with an &#039;x&#039; inside of it represents a vector into the page. A circle with a dot inside represents a vector out of the page.&lt;br /&gt;
:b) Into the page&lt;br /&gt;
:: Initially, at the time of the image, there are 4 circles representing magnetic field enclosed by the bars. However, as the bar moves, at some time t, the number of circles enclosed by the bar will increase; therefore, there is more magnetic field inside the loop. This means that the change in magnetic field is in the direction of the magnetic field. &lt;br /&gt;
:c) Out of the page&lt;br /&gt;
:: The negative change in magnetic field is in the opposite direction as change in magnetic field.&lt;br /&gt;
:d) Counterclockwise&lt;br /&gt;
:: Point your thumb in the direction of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;-\frac{d\vec{B}}{dt}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Your fingers will curl in the direction of current.&lt;br /&gt;
:e) Positive charges at the top, negative charges at the bottom&lt;br /&gt;
::The magnetic force on a particle is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\vec{F} = q\vec{v} \times \vec{B} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, so point your fingers in the direction of the velocity of the bar and curl them in the direction of magnetic field. The direction of your thumb is the direction of force on a positive particle.&lt;br /&gt;
:f) Down&lt;br /&gt;
::Positive charges have an electric field that points away from them while negative particles have an electric field that point towards them. If the top of the bar is positively charged, the field will point downward toward the negative particles.&lt;br /&gt;
:g) Left&lt;br /&gt;
::When a current is involved, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\vec{F} = I\vec{l} \times \vec{B}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, so point your fingers in the direction of the length of the bar (in the direction of current) and curl them in the direction of magnetic field. The direction of your thumb is the direction of force on the bar.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Medium===&lt;br /&gt;
A bar of length &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;L = 2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is moving across two other bars in a region of magnetic field, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;B = 0.0013T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; directed into the page. The bar is moving with a velocity of 10 m/s, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the width of the area enclosed. What is the magnitude of the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;emf&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; produced?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Example1.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
SOLUTION:&lt;br /&gt;
:Because the amount of magnetic field enclosed by the system is changing with time, we must use Faraday&#039;s Law: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;|emf| = \frac{d}{dt} \int\! \vec{B} \cdot \vec{n}dA&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:First, integrate through the formula: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;|emf| = \frac{d}{dt} \left(\vec{B} \cdot A\right)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Change in area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{A} = L\Delta{x}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:In this case, the distance &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is changing and resulting in a change in area, so the formula becomes: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;|emf| = \vec{B} \cdot L\frac{d}{dt}x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:The derivative of distance is velocity. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{dx}{dt} = v&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Therefore, |emf| in this problem is equal to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;BLv = .026 V &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
A long straight wire carrying current I = .3 A is moving with speed v = 5 m/s toward a small circular coil of radius R = .005 and 10 turns. The long wire is in the plane of the coil. The coil is very small, so that, at any fixed moment in time, you can neglect the spatial variation of the wire&#039;s magnetic field over the area of the coil.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Example2.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:a) Is the induced current in the coil flowing clockwise or counterclockwise?&lt;br /&gt;
:b) At the instant when the long wire is a distance x = 4 m from the center of the coil, determine the magnitude of the induced emf in the coil.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now consider the case where the wire is stationary and the coil is moving down parallel to the wire with a constant speed, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v = 2 m/s&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
:c) At the instant when the long wire is a distance x = 4 m from the center of the coil, determine the magnitude of the induced emf in the coil.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Exemploo3.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
SOLUTION:&lt;br /&gt;
:a) Counterclockwise&lt;br /&gt;
:: Using the right hand rule, if you point your thumb in the direction of current (+y), your fingers will curl in the direction of magnetic field. In this case, magnetic field is pointing into the page at the coil. At the location of the coil, the magnitude of the magnetic field due to the wire is increasing as the wire moves closer; therefore, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{d\vec{B}}{dt}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is pointing into the page, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;-\frac{d\vec{B}}{dt}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is pointing out of the page. If you point your thumb in the direction of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;-\frac{d\vec{B}}{dt}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, your fingers curl in the direction of the induced current. &lt;br /&gt;
:b) &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; |emf| = 1.47E-11 V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::After integrating Faraday&#039;s Law, we get &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;|emf| = \frac{d}{dt} (\vec{B} \cdot A)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::Notice that distance &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is changing with time.&lt;br /&gt;
::After doing this derivative, we get &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;|emf| = \frac{\mu_0IR^2v}{2x^2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::This is the magnitude of emf for &#039;&#039;&#039;one&#039;&#039;&#039; loop in the coil, so we have to multiply it by the number of loops, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;N&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;|emf| = \frac{N\mu_0IR^2v}{2x^2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:c) |emf| = 0&lt;br /&gt;
::Remember that the emf relies on a changing magnetic field, which was dependent on a changing &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; in the previous example. Now, however, the coil is moving parallel to the wire, meaning there is no change in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and no change in magnetic field.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Believe it or not, Faraday&#039;s law can be applied to musical instruments such as the electric guitar. In many electric instruments, &#039;pickup coils&#039; sense the vibration of the strings, which causes variations in magnetic flux. These pickup coils often consist of magnet wrapped with a coil of copper wire, where the magnet creates a magnetic field and the vibrations of the string disturb the field, inducing a current in the coiled wire.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I am a biomedical engineering student, and one application of Faraday&#039;s law in the medical field is transcranial magnetic stimulation. During this procedure, magnetic coils are used to stimulate small regions of the brain through electromagnetic induction. Current is discharged from a capacitor into the coil to produce pulsed magnetic fields. This technique can be used to evaluate and diagnose various conditions affecting the connection between the brain and muscles, including strokes and motor neuron diseases. It has also been said to alleviate the symptoms of major depressive disorder.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I am currently majoring in mechanical engineering, and in this field, we are required to work with both mechanics and circuit-like scenarios. Personally, I am interested in going into the car manufacturing industry, where motional emf plays a very important role. When you move an object through a magnetic field, it resists movement and generates electricity in the loop. If this is done with enough force, it could be used to stop a small car or roller-coaster.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Prior to 1831, the only known way to make an electric current flow through a conducting wire was to connect the ends of the wire to the positive and negative terminals of a battery. We know from the loop rule that around a closed loop, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V = emf = \oint \vec{E} \cdot d\vec{l} = 0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. However, Michael Faraday discovered through his experiments 2 ways in which current could be induced in a closed loop of wire in the absence of a battery: by changing the magnetic field around the loop, or by moving the loop through a constant magnetic field.&lt;br /&gt;
In his first experiment, Faraday wrapped two wires around opposite sides of an iron ring and plugged one wire into a galvanometer and the other into a battery. He observed that when he held a bar magnet was held stationary with respect to the loop, the galvanometer did not read a current. However, when he moved the bar magnet towards or away from the loop, the galvanometer read a non-zero current. If a current is flowing, that means there must be some emf. Based off of the results of his experiments, Faraday eventually came up with a relationship telling us that the emf generated in a loop of wire in some magnetic field is proportional to the rate of change of the magnetic flux through the loop. This is what we know today as Faraday&#039;s law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, at the time, his theory was rejected until James Clerk Maxwell took it up again and incorporated it into his Maxwell&#039;s equations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You may want to explore the process of calculating motional emf before the use of Faraday&#039;s Law. Maxwell&#039;s equations and circuits with resistance are also relevant and may be worth looking into.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Motional emf problems can be pretty tricky depending on what the question is asking you to do. It&#039;s always a good idea to know how each formula came about, and how it can change bases on different scenarios. This includes the formula for resistance in a circuit, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V = IR&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. A problem could go as far as to give you a resistance for a circuit, ask you to solve for the potential difference, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, or &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;emf&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and then ask you to solve for the current as well.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lastly, I advise you to become familiar with Lenz&#039;s law because it gives the direction of the induced emf and current resulting from electromagnetic induction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:SparkNotes: SAT Physics&lt;br /&gt;
:Matter &amp;amp; Interactions, Vol. II: Electric and Magnetic Interactions, 4nd Edition by R. Chabay &amp;amp; B. Sherwood (John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons 2015) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;Video Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wgtw5lPKFXI&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;Text Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039; https://www.boundless.com/physics/textbooks/boundless-physics-textbook/induction-ac-circuits-and-electrical-technologies-22/magnetic-flux-induction-and-faraday-s-law-161/motional-emf-570-6257/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faraday%27s_law_of_induction&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/em/lectures/node43.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/elevol.html#c4&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pickup_(music_technology)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.physics.princeton.edu/~mcdonald/examples/guitar.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transcranial_magnetic_stimulation#Technical_information&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Faraday&#039;s Law]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Samigues3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Motional_Emf_using_Faraday%27s_Law&amp;diff=29496</id>
		<title>Motional Emf using Faraday&#039;s Law</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Motional_Emf_using_Faraday%27s_Law&amp;diff=29496"/>
		<updated>2017-11-25T03:38:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Samigues3: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;CLAIMED BY: Kasey Cockerill (Fall 2016)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chelsea Calhoun&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Edited by Solange Amigues &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Motional emf can be calculated in terms of magnetic flux, where motional emf is quantitatively equal to the rate of change of the magnetic flux. If an enclosed magnetic field remains constant but the loop changes shape or orientation, the resulting change in area leads to a change in magnetic flux.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When a wire moves through an area of magnetic field, a current begins to flow along the wire as a result of magnetic forces. Originally, we learned to calculate the motional emf in a moving bar by using the equation  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;{\frac{q(\vec{v} \times \vec{B})L}{q}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where v is the velocity of the bar and L is the bar length. However, there&#039;s an easier way to do this: by writing an equation for emf in terms of magnetic flux.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Motional emf results when the area enclosing a constant magnetic field changes. Let&#039;s observe a specific scenario in which a bar of length L slides along two frictionless bars. We can observe the change in area over a short time as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{A} = L\Delta{x} = Lv\Delta{t}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. We already know that magnetic flux is defined by the formula: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi_m = \int\! \vec{B} \cdot\vec{n}dA&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. In the case that v is perpendicular to B, we combine these to get: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{\Delta{\Phi_m}}{\Delta{t}} = BLv &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Emf is said to be the work done per unit charge: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;emf = \frac{FL}{q} = \frac{qvBL}{q} = vBL&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (again, we are assuming v is perpendicular to B).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Comparing the above two formulas, we can clearly see that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;|{emf}| = |\frac{d\Phi_m}{dt}|&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. This is exactly what Faraday&#039;s Law tells us!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Faraday&#039;s Law is defined as:  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;emf = \int\! \vec{E} \cdot d\vec{l} = -\frac{d}{dt} \int\! \vec{B} \cdot \vec{n}dA&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\vec{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the Non-Coulomb electric field along the path, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;l&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the length of the path you&#039;re integrating on, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\vec{B}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the magnetic field inside the area enclosed, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\vec{n}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the unit vector perpendicular to area A.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[File:ExamplePic1.jpg]]&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the image shown above, a bar of length &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;L&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is moving along two other bars from right to left. The blue circles containing &amp;quot;x&amp;quot;s represent a magnetic field directed into the page. As the bar moves to the right, the system encloses a greater amount of magnetic field. To explain this concept more clearly, take a look at the figures below. This image shows a bar moving in a magnetic field at two different times. In the first picture, at time &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, the system encircles half of two individual magnetic field circles. However, in the second picture taken at time &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t_2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, the system now encircles 6 full magnetic field circles. Of course, this explanation isn&#039;t using technical terms, but the point still stands: the enclosed magnetic field is increasing as time increases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[File:ExamplePic2.jpg]]&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Returning to the scenario in the first image, because the magnetic field is not constant, we can use Faraday&#039;s Law to solve for the motional emf.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As stated above, the formula is as follows: &amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;emf =  -\frac{d}{dt} \int\! \vec{B} \cdot \vec{n}dA&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, integrate the integral with respect to the area of the rectangle enclosed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;emf = -\frac{d}{dt} (\vec{B} \cdot \vec{n}A)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We have the dimensions of the bar in variables: length &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;L&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and width &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Substitute these values for the area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;emf = -\frac{d}{dt} (\vec{B} \cdot \vec{n}(L)(x))&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now that we have this formula, we have to figure out how to take its derivative with respect to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Which of the magnitudes of these values is changing? &lt;br /&gt;
:::The magnitude of the magnetic field is constant. (More &amp;quot;circles&amp;quot; are added as time increases, but the magnitude of each &amp;quot;circle&amp;quot; does not change.&lt;br /&gt;
:::The magnitude of the normal vector is constant.&lt;br /&gt;
:::The length, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;L&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, of the bar is constant.&lt;br /&gt;
:::The width of the surface enclosed, &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;&#039;changes&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the formula now becomes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;emf = (\vec{B} \cdot \vec{n}(L))\left(-\frac{d}{dt}(x)\right)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this case, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{dx}{dt} = \vec{v}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; because &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a function of time, where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\vec{v}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the velocity of the moving bar. Substituting that in, we get:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;emf = (\vec{B} \cdot \vec{n}(L))\vec{v}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in these values, we can solve for the motional emf of the bar.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because the magnetic field is changing with time, however, there is also an induced current flowing through the circuit. We can find the direction of the current using the right hand rule. To do this, we can use 2 different methods:&lt;br /&gt;
: &#039;&#039;&#039;1.&#039;&#039;&#039; We can use the equation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\vec{F} = q\vec{v} \times \vec{B}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\vec{F}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the force on the bar, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\vec{v}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the velocity of the bar. Using the right hand rule, we can point our fingers in the direction of the velocity of the bar and curl them in the direction of the magnetic field. The direction that our thumb points is the direction of the force on a positive charge. In this case, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\vec{F}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; points upward, so the positive charges in the bar will move to the top, causing it to polarize with positive charges at the top and negative charges at the bottom. We can now visualize the bar as a battery that causes a current &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; to run out of the positive end. In this case, since the bar is polarized with the positive charges at the top, the current will flow out of the top of the bar and continue around the circuit. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;2.&#039;&#039;&#039; We can use the negative direction of the change in magnetic field, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;-\frac{dB}{dt}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; to find the direction of the current. To do this, make a diagram comparing the magnitude of the magnetic field enclosed at time &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and at time &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t_2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Then, draw an arrow representing the direction of change of the magnetic field. Now, flip the arrow to take the negative of that vector&#039;s direction. Using the right hand rule, point your thumb in the direction of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;-\frac{dB}{dt}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and the curl of your fingers will give you the direction of the induced current, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If  the magnetic field is NOT constant, meaning it changes with time, the derivative &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{d}{dt}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; will be distributed to both &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\vec{B}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; in the formula. In this case, we must use the product rule to be able to set up the equation and continue solving for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;emf&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;emf = -(\frac{d}{dt} \vec{B})A \cdot B(\frac{d}{dt}A)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The B (dA/dt) can be replaced by BLv.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first term, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\frac{d}{dt}\vec{B})A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, represents Faraday&#039;s law and is nonzero of there is a varying magnetic field.&lt;br /&gt;
The second term, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;B(\frac{d}{dt}A)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, represents motional emf and is nonzero if there is a change in the amount of enclosed area.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the figure below, identify the following.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:a) Direction of magnetic field&lt;br /&gt;
:b) Direction of change in magnetic field, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{d\vec{B}}{dt}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:c) Direction of negative change in magnetic field, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;-\frac{d\vec{B}}{dt}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:d) Direction of current, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:e) Polarization of moving bar&lt;br /&gt;
:f) Direction of electric field inside bar due to polarization&lt;br /&gt;
:g) Direction of force on bar&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Example1.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
SOLUTION:&lt;br /&gt;
:a) Into the page&lt;br /&gt;
:: A circle with an &#039;x&#039; inside of it represents a vector into the page. A circle with a dot inside represents a vector out of the page.&lt;br /&gt;
:b) Into the page&lt;br /&gt;
:: Initially, at the time of the image, there are 4 circles representing magnetic field enclosed by the bars. However, as the bar moves, at some time t, the number of circles enclosed by the bar will increase; therefore, there is more magnetic field inside the loop. This means that the change in magnetic field is in the direction of the magnetic field. &lt;br /&gt;
:c) Out of the page&lt;br /&gt;
:: The negative change in magnetic field is in the opposite direction as change in magnetic field.&lt;br /&gt;
:d) Counterclockwise&lt;br /&gt;
:: Point your thumb in the direction of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;-\frac{d\vec{B}}{dt}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Your fingers will curl in the direction of current.&lt;br /&gt;
:e) Positive charges at the top, negative charges at the bottom&lt;br /&gt;
::The magnetic force on a particle is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\vec{F} = q\vec{v} \times \vec{B} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, so point your fingers in the direction of the velocity of the bar and curl them in the direction of magnetic field. The direction of your thumb is the direction of force on a positive particle.&lt;br /&gt;
:f) Down&lt;br /&gt;
::Positive charges have an electric field that points away from them while negative particles have an electric field that point towards them. If the top of the bar is positively charged, the field will point downward toward the negative particles.&lt;br /&gt;
:g) Left&lt;br /&gt;
::When a current is involved, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\vec{F} = I\vec{l} \times \vec{B}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, so point your fingers in the direction of the length of the bar (in the direction of current) and curl them in the direction of magnetic field. The direction of your thumb is the direction of force on the bar.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Medium===&lt;br /&gt;
A bar of length &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;L = 2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is moving across two other bars in a region of magnetic field, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;B = 0.0013T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; directed into the page. The bar is moving with a velocity of 10 m/s, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the width of the area enclosed. What is the magnitude of the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;emf&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; produced?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Example1.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
SOLUTION:&lt;br /&gt;
:Because the amount of magnetic field enclosed by the system is changing with time, we must use Faraday&#039;s Law: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;|emf| = \frac{d}{dt} \int\! \vec{B} \cdot \vec{n}dA&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:First, integrate through the formula: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;|emf| = \frac{d}{dt} \left(\vec{B} \cdot A\right)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Change in area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{A} = L\Delta{x}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:In this case, the distance &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is changing and resulting in a change in area, so the formula becomes: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;|emf| = \vec{B} \cdot L\frac{d}{dt}x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:The derivative of distance is velocity. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{dx}{dt} = v&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Therefore, |emf| in this problem is equal to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;BLv = .026 V &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
A long straight wire carrying current I = .3 A is moving with speed v = 5 m/s toward a small circular coil of radius R = .005 and 10 turns. The long wire is in the plane of the coil. The coil is very small, so that, at any fixed moment in time, you can neglect the spatial variation of the wire&#039;s magnetic field over the area of the coil.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Example2.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:a) Is the induced current in the coil flowing clockwise or counterclockwise?&lt;br /&gt;
:b) At the instant when the long wire is a distance x = 4 m from the center of the coil, determine the magnitude of the induced emf in the coil.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now consider the case where the wire is stationary and the coil is moving down parallel to the wire with a constant speed, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v = 2 m/s&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
:c) At the instant when the long wire is a distance x = 4 m from the center of the coil, determine the magnitude of the induced emf in the coil.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Exemploo3.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
SOLUTION:&lt;br /&gt;
:a) Counterclockwise&lt;br /&gt;
:: Using the right hand rule, if you point your thumb in the direction of current (+y), your fingers will curl in the direction of magnetic field. In this case, magnetic field is pointing into the page at the coil. At the location of the coil, the magnitude of the magnetic field due to the wire is increasing as the wire moves closer; therefore, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{d\vec{B}}{dt}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is pointing into the page, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;-\frac{d\vec{B}}{dt}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is pointing out of the page. If you point your thumb in the direction of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;-\frac{d\vec{B}}{dt}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, your fingers curl in the direction of the induced current. &lt;br /&gt;
:b) &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; |emf| = 1.47E-11 V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::After integrating Faraday&#039;s Law, we get &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;|emf| = \frac{d}{dt} (\vec{B} \cdot A)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::Notice that distance &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is changing with time.&lt;br /&gt;
::After doing this derivative, we get &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;|emf| = \frac{\mu_0IR^2v}{2x^2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::This is the magnitude of emf for &#039;&#039;&#039;one&#039;&#039;&#039; loop in the coil, so we have to multiply it by the number of loops, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;N&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;|emf| = \frac{N\mu_0IR^2v}{2x^2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:c) |emf| = 0&lt;br /&gt;
::Remember that the emf relies on a changing magnetic field, which was dependent on a changing &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; in the previous example. Now, however, the coil is moving parallel to the wire, meaning there is no change in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and no change in magnetic field.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Believe it or not, Faraday&#039;s law can be applied to musical instruments such as the electric guitar. In many electric instruments, &#039;pickup coils&#039; sense the vibration of the strings, which causes variations in magnetic flux. These pickup coils often consist of magnet wrapped with a coil of copper wire, where the magnet creates a magnetic field and the vibrations of the string disturb the field, inducing a current in the coiled wire.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I am a biomedical engineering student, and one application of Faraday&#039;s law in the medical field is transcranial magnetic stimulation. During this procedure, magnetic coils are used to stimulate small regions of the brain through electromagnetic induction. Current is discharged from a capacitor into the coil to produce pulsed magnetic fields. This technique can be used to evaluate and diagnose various conditions affecting the connection between the brain and muscles, including strokes and motor neuron diseases. It has also been said to alleviate the symptoms of major depressive disorder.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I am currently majoring in mechanical engineering, and in this field, we are required to work with both mechanics and circuit-like scenarios. Personally, I am interested in going into the car manufacturing industry, where motional emf plays a very important role. When you move an object through a magnetic field, it resists movement and generates electricity in the loop. If this is done with enough force, it could be used to stop a small car or roller-coaster.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Prior to 1831, the only known way to make an electric current flow through a conducting wire was to connect the ends of the wire to the positive and negative terminals of a battery. We know from the loop rule that around a closed loop, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V = emf = \oint \vec{E} \cdot d\vec{l} = 0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. However, Michael Faraday discovered through his experiments 2 ways in which current could be induced in a closed loop of wire in the absence of a battery: by changing the magnetic field around the loop, or by moving the loop through a constant magnetic field.&lt;br /&gt;
In his first experiment, Faraday wrapped two wires around opposite sides of an iron ring and plugged one wire into a galvanometer and the other into a battery. He observed that when he held a bar magnet was held stationary with respect to the loop, the galvanometer did not read a current. However, when he moved the bar magnet towards or away from the loop, the galvanometer read a non-zero current. If a current is flowing, that means there must be some emf. Based off of the results of his experiments, Faraday eventually came up with a relationship telling us that the emf generated in a loop of wire in some magnetic field is proportional to the rate of change of the magnetic flux through the loop. This is what we know today as Faraday&#039;s law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, at the time, his theory was rejected until James Clerk Maxwell took it up again and incorporated it into his Maxwell&#039;s equations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You may want to explore the process of calculating motional emf before the use of Faraday&#039;s Law. Maxwell&#039;s equations and circuits with resistance are also relevant and may be worth looking into.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Motional emf problems can be pretty tricky depending on what the question is asking you to do. It&#039;s always a good idea to know how each formula came about, and how it can change bases on different scenarios. This includes the formula for resistance in a circuit, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V = IR&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. A problem could go as far as to give you a resistance for a circuit, ask you to solve for the potential difference, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, or &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;emf&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and then ask you to solve for the current as well.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lastly, I advise you to become familiar with Lenz&#039;s law because it gives the direction of the induced emf and current resulting from electromagnetic induction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:SparkNotes: SAT Physics&lt;br /&gt;
:Matter &amp;amp; Interactions, Vol. II: Electric and Magnetic Interactions, 4nd Edition by R. Chabay &amp;amp; B. Sherwood (John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons 2015) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;Video Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wgtw5lPKFXI&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;Text Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039; https://www.boundless.com/physics/textbooks/boundless-physics-textbook/induction-ac-circuits-and-electrical-technologies-22/magnetic-flux-induction-and-faraday-s-law-161/motional-emf-570-6257/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faraday%27s_law_of_induction&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/em/lectures/node43.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/elevol.html#c4&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pickup_(music_technology)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.physics.princeton.edu/~mcdonald/examples/guitar.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transcranial_magnetic_stimulation#Technical_information&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Faraday&#039;s Law]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Samigues3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Motional_Emf_using_Faraday%27s_Law&amp;diff=29495</id>
		<title>Motional Emf using Faraday&#039;s Law</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Motional_Emf_using_Faraday%27s_Law&amp;diff=29495"/>
		<updated>2017-11-25T03:27:56Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Samigues3: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;CLAIMED BY: Kasey Cockerill (Fall 2016)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chelsea Calhoun&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Motional emf can be calculated in terms of magnetic flux, where motional emf is quantitatively equal to the rate of change of the magnetic flux. If an enclosed magnetic field remains constant but the loop changes shape or orientation, the resulting change in area leads to a change in magnetic flux.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When a wire moves through an area of magnetic field, a current begins to flow along the wire as a result of magnetic forces. Originally, we learned to calculate the motional emf in a moving bar by using the equation  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;{\frac{q(\vec{v} \times \vec{B})L}{q}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where v is the velocity of the bar and L is the bar length. However, there&#039;s an easier way to do this: by writing an equation for emf in terms of magnetic flux.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Motional emf results when the area enclosing a constant magnetic field changes. Let&#039;s observe a specific scenario in which a bar of length L slides along two frictionless bars. We can observe the change in area over a short time as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{A} = L\Delta{x} = Lv\Delta{t}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. We already know that magnetic flux is defined by the formula: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi_m = \int\! \vec{B} \cdot\vec{n}dA&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. In the case that v is perpendicular to B, we combine these to get: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{\Delta{\Phi_m}}{\Delta{t}} = BLv &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Emf is said to be the work done per unit charge: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;emf = \frac{FL}{q} = \frac{qvBL}{q} = vBL&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (again, we are assuming v is perpendicular to B).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Comparing the above two formulas, we can clearly see that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;|{emf}| = |\frac{d\Phi_m}{dt}|&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. This is exactly what Faraday&#039;s Law tells us!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Faraday&#039;s Law is defined as:  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;emf = \int\! \vec{E} \cdot d\vec{l} = -\frac{d}{dt} \int\! \vec{B} \cdot \vec{n}dA&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\vec{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the Non-Coulomb electric field along the path, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;l&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the length of the path you&#039;re integrating on, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\vec{B}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the magnetic field inside the area enclosed, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\vec{n}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the unit vector perpendicular to area A.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[File:ExamplePic1.jpg]]&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the image shown above, a bar of length &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;L&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is moving along two other bars from right to left. The blue circles containing &amp;quot;x&amp;quot;s represent a magnetic field directed into the page. As the bar moves to the right, the system encloses a greater amount of magnetic field. To explain this concept more clearly, take a look at the figures below. This image shows a bar moving in a magnetic field at two different times. In the first picture, at time &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, the system encircles half of two individual magnetic field circles. However, in the second picture taken at time &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t_2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, the system now encircles 6 full magnetic field circles. Of course, this explanation isn&#039;t using technical terms, but the point still stands: the enclosed magnetic field is increasing as time increases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[File:ExamplePic2.jpg]]&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Returning to the scenario in the first image, because the magnetic field is not constant, we can use Faraday&#039;s Law to solve for the motional emf.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As stated above, the formula is as follows: &amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;emf =  -\frac{d}{dt} \int\! \vec{B} \cdot \vec{n}dA&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, integrate the integral with respect to the area of the rectangle enclosed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;emf = -\frac{d}{dt} (\vec{B} \cdot \vec{n}A)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We have the dimensions of the bar in variables: length &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;L&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and width &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Substitute these values for the area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;emf = -\frac{d}{dt} (\vec{B} \cdot \vec{n}(L)(x))&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now that we have this formula, we have to figure out how to take its derivative with respect to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Which of the magnitudes of these values is changing? &lt;br /&gt;
:::The magnitude of the magnetic field is constant. (More &amp;quot;circles&amp;quot; are added as time increases, but the magnitude of each &amp;quot;circle&amp;quot; does not change.&lt;br /&gt;
:::The magnitude of the normal vector is constant.&lt;br /&gt;
:::The length, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;L&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, of the bar is constant.&lt;br /&gt;
:::The width of the surface enclosed, &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;&#039;changes&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the formula now becomes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;emf = (\vec{B} \cdot \vec{n}(L))\left(-\frac{d}{dt}(x)\right)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this case, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{dx}{dt} = \vec{v}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; because &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a function of time, where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\vec{v}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the velocity of the moving bar. Substituting that in, we get:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;emf = (\vec{B} \cdot \vec{n}(L))\vec{v}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in these values, we can solve for the motional emf of the bar.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because the magnetic field is changing with time, however, there is also an induced current flowing through the circuit. We can find the direction of the current using the right hand rule. To do this, we can use 2 different methods:&lt;br /&gt;
: &#039;&#039;&#039;1.&#039;&#039;&#039; We can use the equation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\vec{F} = q\vec{v} \times \vec{B}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\vec{F}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the force on the bar, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\vec{v}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the velocity of the bar. Using the right hand rule, we can point our fingers in the direction of the velocity of the bar and curl them in the direction of the magnetic field. The direction that our thumb points is the direction of the force on a positive charge. In this case, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\vec{F}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; points upward, so the positive charges in the bar will move to the top, causing it to polarize with positive charges at the top and negative charges at the bottom. We can now visualize the bar as a battery that causes a current &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; to run out of the positive end. In this case, since the bar is polarized with the positive charges at the top, the current will flow out of the top of the bar and continue around the circuit. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;2.&#039;&#039;&#039; We can use the negative direction of the change in magnetic field, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;-\frac{dB}{dt}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; to find the direction of the current. To do this, make a diagram comparing the magnitude of the magnetic field enclosed at time &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and at time &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t_2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Then, draw an arrow representing the direction of change of the magnetic field. Now, flip the arrow to take the negative of that vector&#039;s direction. Using the right hand rule, point your thumb in the direction of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;-\frac{dB}{dt}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and the curl of your fingers will give you the direction of the induced current, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If  the magnetic field is NOT constant, meaning it changes with time, the derivative &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{d}{dt}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; will be distributed to both &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\vec{B}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; in the formula. In this case, we must use the product rule to be able to set up the equation and continue solving for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;emf&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;emf = -(\frac{d}{dt} \vec{B})A \cdot B(\frac{d}{dt}A)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The B (dA/dt) can be replaced by BLv.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first term, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\frac{d}{dt}\vec{B})A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, represents Faraday&#039;s law and is nonzero of there is a varying magnetic field.&lt;br /&gt;
The second term, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;B(\frac{d}{dt}A)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, represents motional emf and is nonzero if there is a change in the amount of enclosed area.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the figure below, identify the following.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:a) Direction of magnetic field&lt;br /&gt;
:b) Direction of change in magnetic field, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{d\vec{B}}{dt}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:c) Direction of negative change in magnetic field, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;-\frac{d\vec{B}}{dt}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:d) Direction of current, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:e) Polarization of moving bar&lt;br /&gt;
:f) Direction of electric field inside bar due to polarization&lt;br /&gt;
:g) Direction of force on bar&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Example1.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
SOLUTION:&lt;br /&gt;
:a) Into the page&lt;br /&gt;
:: A circle with an &#039;x&#039; inside of it represents a vector into the page. A circle with a dot inside represents a vector out of the page.&lt;br /&gt;
:b) Into the page&lt;br /&gt;
:: Initially, at the time of the image, there are 4 circles representing magnetic field enclosed by the bars. However, as the bar moves, at some time t, the number of circles enclosed by the bar will increase; therefore, there is more magnetic field inside the loop. This means that the change in magnetic field is in the direction of the magnetic field. &lt;br /&gt;
:c) Out of the page&lt;br /&gt;
:: The negative change in magnetic field is in the opposite direction as change in magnetic field.&lt;br /&gt;
:d) Counterclockwise&lt;br /&gt;
:: Point your thumb in the direction of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;-\frac{d\vec{B}}{dt}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Your fingers will curl in the direction of current.&lt;br /&gt;
:e) Positive charges at the top, negative charges at the bottom&lt;br /&gt;
::The magnetic force on a particle is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\vec{F} = q\vec{v} \times \vec{B} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, so point your fingers in the direction of the velocity of the bar and curl them in the direction of magnetic field. The direction of your thumb is the direction of force on a positive particle.&lt;br /&gt;
:f) Down&lt;br /&gt;
::Positive charges have an electric field that points away from them while negative particles have an electric field that point towards them. If the top of the bar is positively charged, the field will point downward toward the negative particles.&lt;br /&gt;
:g) Left&lt;br /&gt;
::When a current is involved, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\vec{F} = I\vec{l} \times \vec{B}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, so point your fingers in the direction of the length of the bar (in the direction of current) and curl them in the direction of magnetic field. The direction of your thumb is the direction of force on the bar.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Medium===&lt;br /&gt;
A bar of length &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;L = 2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is moving across two other bars in a region of magnetic field, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;B = 0.0013T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; directed into the page. The bar is moving with a velocity of 10 m/s, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the width of the area enclosed. What is the magnitude of the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;emf&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; produced?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Example1.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
SOLUTION:&lt;br /&gt;
:Because the amount of magnetic field enclosed by the system is changing with time, we must use Faraday&#039;s Law: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;|emf| = \frac{d}{dt} \int\! \vec{B} \cdot \vec{n}dA&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:First, integrate through the formula: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;|emf| = \frac{d}{dt} \left(\vec{B} \cdot A\right)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Change in area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{A} = L\Delta{x}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:In this case, the distance &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is changing and resulting in a change in area, so the formula becomes: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;|emf| = \vec{B} \cdot L\frac{d}{dt}x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:The derivative of distance is velocity. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{dx}{dt} = v&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Therefore, |emf| in this problem is equal to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;BLv = .026 V &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
A long straight wire carrying current I = .3 A is moving with speed v = 5 m/s toward a small circular coil of radius R = .005 and 10 turns. The long wire is in the plane of the coil. The coil is very small, so that, at any fixed moment in time, you can neglect the spatial variation of the wire&#039;s magnetic field over the area of the coil.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Example2.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:a) Is the induced current in the coil flowing clockwise or counterclockwise?&lt;br /&gt;
:b) At the instant when the long wire is a distance x = 4 m from the center of the coil, determine the magnitude of the induced emf in the coil.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now consider the case where the wire is stationary and the coil is moving down parallel to the wire with a constant speed, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v = 2 m/s&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
:c) At the instant when the long wire is a distance x = 4 m from the center of the coil, determine the magnitude of the induced emf in the coil.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Exemploo3.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
SOLUTION:&lt;br /&gt;
:a) Counterclockwise&lt;br /&gt;
:: Using the right hand rule, if you point your thumb in the direction of current (+y), your fingers will curl in the direction of magnetic field. In this case, magnetic field is pointing into the page at the coil. At the location of the coil, the magnitude of the magnetic field due to the wire is increasing as the wire moves closer; therefore, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{d\vec{B}}{dt}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is pointing into the page, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;-\frac{d\vec{B}}{dt}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is pointing out of the page. If you point your thumb in the direction of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;-\frac{d\vec{B}}{dt}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, your fingers curl in the direction of the induced current. &lt;br /&gt;
:b) &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; |emf| = 1.47E-11 V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::After integrating Faraday&#039;s Law, we get &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;|emf| = \frac{d}{dt} (\vec{B} \cdot A)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::Notice that distance &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is changing with time.&lt;br /&gt;
::After doing this derivative, we get &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;|emf| = \frac{\mu_0IR^2v}{2x^2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::This is the magnitude of emf for &#039;&#039;&#039;one&#039;&#039;&#039; loop in the coil, so we have to multiply it by the number of loops, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;N&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;|emf| = \frac{N\mu_0IR^2v}{2x^2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:c) |emf| = 0&lt;br /&gt;
::Remember that the emf relies on a changing magnetic field, which was dependent on a changing &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; in the previous example. Now, however, the coil is moving parallel to the wire, meaning there is no change in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and no change in magnetic field.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
1. How is this topic connected to something that you are interested in?&lt;br /&gt;
:Believe it or not, Faraday&#039;s law can be applied to musical instruments such as the electric guitar. In many electric instruments, &#039;pickup coils&#039; sense the vibration of the strings, which causes variations in magnetic flux. These pickup coils often consist of magnet wrapped with a coil of copper wire, where the magnet creates a magnetic field and the vibrations of the string disturb the field, inducing a current in the coiled wire.&lt;br /&gt;
2. How is it connected to your major?&lt;br /&gt;
: I am a biomedical engineering student, and one application of Faraday&#039;s law in the medical field is transcranial magnetic stimulation. During this procedure, magnetic coils are used to stimulate small regions of the brain through electromagnetic induction. Current is discharged from a capacitor into the coil to produce pulsed magnetic fields. This technique can be used to evaluate and diagnose various conditions affecting the connection between the brain and muscles, including strokes and motor neuron diseases. It has also been said to alleviate the symptoms of major depressive disorder.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I am currently majoring in mechanical engineering, and in this field, we are required to work with both mechanics and circuit-like scenarios. Personally, I am interested in going into the car manufacturing industry, where motional emf plays a very important role. When you move an object through a magnetic field, it resists movement and generates electricity in the loop. If this is done with enough force, it could be used to stop a small car or roller-coaster.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Prior to 1831, the only known way to make an electric current flow through a conducting wire was to connect the ends of the wire to the positive and negative terminals of a battery. We know from the loop rule that around a closed loop, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V = emf = \oint \vec{E} \cdot d\vec{l} = 0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. However, Michael Faraday discovered through his experiments 2 ways in which current could be induced in a closed loop of wire in the absence of a battery: by changing the magnetic field around the loop, or by moving the loop through a constant magnetic field. In his first experiment, Faraday wrapped two wires around opposite sides of an iron ring and plugged one wire into a galvanometer and the other into a battery. He observed that when he held a bar magnet was held stationary with respect to the loop, the galvanometer did not read a current. However, when he moved the bar magnet towards or away from the loop, the galvanometer read a non-zero current. If a current is flowing, that means there must be some emf. Based off of the results of his experiments, Faraday eventually came up with a relationship telling us that the emf generated in a loop of wire in some magnetic field is proportional to the rate of change of the magnetic flux through the loop. This is what we know today as Faraday&#039;s law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You may want to explore the process of calculating motional emf before the use of Faraday&#039;s Law. Maxwell&#039;s equations and circuits with resistance are also relevant and may be worth looking into.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Motional emf problems can be pretty tricky depending on what the question is asking you to do. It&#039;s always a good idea to know how each formula came about, and how it can change bases on different scenarios. This includes the formula for resistance in a circuit, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V = IR&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. A problem could go as far as to give you a resistance for a circuit, ask you to solve for the potential difference, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, or &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;emf&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and then ask you to solve for the current as well.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lastly, I advise you to become familiar with Lenz&#039;s law because it gives the direction of the induced emf and current resulting from electromagnetic induction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:SparkNotes: SAT Physics&lt;br /&gt;
:Matter &amp;amp; Interactions, Vol. II: Electric and Magnetic Interactions, 4nd Edition by R. Chabay &amp;amp; B. Sherwood (John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons 2015) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;Video Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wgtw5lPKFXI&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;Text Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039; https://www.boundless.com/physics/textbooks/boundless-physics-textbook/induction-ac-circuits-and-electrical-technologies-22/magnetic-flux-induction-and-faraday-s-law-161/motional-emf-570-6257/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faraday%27s_law_of_induction&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/em/lectures/node43.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/elevol.html#c4&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pickup_(music_technology)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.physics.princeton.edu/~mcdonald/examples/guitar.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transcranial_magnetic_stimulation#Technical_information&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Faraday&#039;s Law]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Samigues3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Motional_Emf_using_Faraday%27s_Law&amp;diff=29494</id>
		<title>Motional Emf using Faraday&#039;s Law</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Motional_Emf_using_Faraday%27s_Law&amp;diff=29494"/>
		<updated>2017-11-25T03:25:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Samigues3: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;CLAIMED BY: Kasey Cockerill (Fall 2016)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chelsea Calhoun&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Motional emf can be calculated in terms of magnetic flux, where motional emf is quantitatively equal to the rate of change of the magnetic flux. If an enclosed magnetic field remains constant but the loop changes shape or orientation, the resulting change in area leads to a change in magnetic flux.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When a wire moves through an area of magnetic field, a current begins to flow along the wire as a result of magnetic forces. Originally, we learned to calculate the motional emf in a moving bar by using the equation  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;{\frac{q(\vec{v} \times \vec{B})L}{q}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where v is the velocity of the bar and L is the bar length. However, there&#039;s an easier way to do this: by writing an equation for emf in terms of magnetic flux.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Motional emf results when the area enclosing a constant magnetic field changes. Let&#039;s observe a specific scenario in which a bar of length L slides along two frictionless bars. We can observe the change in area over a short time as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{A} = L\Delta{x} = Lv\Delta{t}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. We already know that magnetic flux is defined by the formula: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi_m = \int\! \vec{B} \cdot\vec{n}dA&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. In the case that v is perpendicular to B, we combine these to get: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{\Delta{\Phi_m}}{\Delta{t}} = BLv &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Emf is said to be the work done per unit charge: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;emf = \frac{FL}{q} = \frac{qvBL}{q} = vBL&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (again, we are assuming v is perpendicular to B).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Comparing the above two formulas, we can clearly see that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;|{emf}| = |\frac{d\Phi_m}{dt}|&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. This is exactly what Faraday&#039;s Law tells us!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Faraday&#039;s Law is defined as:  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;emf = \int\! \vec{E} \cdot d\vec{l} = -\frac{d}{dt} \int\! \vec{B} \cdot \vec{n}dA&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\vec{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the Non-Coulomb electric field along the path, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;l&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the length of the path you&#039;re integrating on, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\vec{B}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the magnetic field inside the area enclosed, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\vec{n}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the unit vector perpendicular to area A.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[File:ExamplePic1.jpg]]&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the image shown above, a bar of length &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;L&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is moving along two other bars from right to left. The blue circles containing &amp;quot;x&amp;quot;s represent a magnetic field directed into the page. As the bar moves to the right, the system encloses a greater amount of magnetic field. To explain this concept more clearly, take a look at the figures below. This image shows a bar moving in a magnetic field at two different times. In the first picture, at time &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, the system encircles half of two individual magnetic field circles. However, in the second picture taken at time &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t_2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, the system now encircles 6 full magnetic field circles. Of course, this explanation isn&#039;t using technical terms, but the point still stands: the enclosed magnetic field is increasing as time increases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[File:ExamplePic2.jpg]]&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Returning to the scenario in the first image, because the magnetic field is not constant, we can use Faraday&#039;s Law to solve for the motional emf.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As stated above, the formula is as follows: &amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;emf =  -\frac{d}{dt} \int\! \vec{B} \cdot \vec{n}dA&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, integrate the integral with respect to the area of the rectangle enclosed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;emf = -\frac{d}{dt} (\vec{B} \cdot \vec{n}A)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We have the dimensions of the bar in variables: length &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;L&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and width &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Substitute these values for the area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;emf = -\frac{d}{dt} (\vec{B} \cdot \vec{n}(L)(x))&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now that we have this formula, we have to figure out how to take its derivative with respect to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Which of the magnitudes of these values is changing? &lt;br /&gt;
:::The magnitude of the magnetic field is constant. (More &amp;quot;circles&amp;quot; are added as time increases, but the magnitude of each &amp;quot;circle&amp;quot; does not change.&lt;br /&gt;
:::The magnitude of the normal vector is constant.&lt;br /&gt;
:::The length, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;L&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, of the bar is constant.&lt;br /&gt;
:::The width of the surface enclosed, &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;&#039;changes&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the formula now becomes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;emf = (\vec{B} \cdot \vec{n}(L))\left(-\frac{d}{dt}(x)\right)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this case, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{dx}{dt} = \vec{v}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; because &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a function of time, where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\vec{v}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the velocity of the moving bar. Substituting that in, we get:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;emf = (\vec{B} \cdot \vec{n}(L))\vec{v}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in these values, we can solve for the motional emf of the bar.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because the magnetic field is changing with time, however, there is also an induced current flowing through the circuit. We can find the direction of the current using the right hand rule. To do this, we can use 2 different methods:&lt;br /&gt;
: &#039;&#039;&#039;1.&#039;&#039;&#039; We can use the equation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\vec{F} = q\vec{v} \times \vec{B}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\vec{F}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the force on the bar, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\vec{v}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the velocity of the bar. Using the right hand rule, we can point our fingers in the direction of the velocity of the bar and curl them in the direction of the magnetic field. The direction that our thumb points is the direction of the force on a positive charge. In this case, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\vec{F}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; points upward, so the positive charges in the bar will move to the top, causing it to polarize with positive charges at the top and negative charges at the bottom. We can now visualize the bar as a battery that causes a current &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; to run out of the positive end. In this case, since the bar is polarized with the positive charges at the top, the current will flow out of the top of the bar and continue around the circuit. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;2.&#039;&#039;&#039; We can use the negative direction of the change in magnetic field, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;-\frac{dB}{dt}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; to find the direction of the current. To do this, make a diagram comparing the magnitude of the magnetic field enclosed at time &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and at time &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t_2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Then, draw an arrow representing the direction of change of the magnetic field. Now, flip the arrow to take the negative of that vector&#039;s direction. Using the right hand rule, point your thumb in the direction of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;-\frac{dB}{dt}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and the curl of your fingers will give you the direction of the induced current, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If  the magnetic field is NOT constant, meaning it changes with time, the derivative &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{d}{dt}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; will be distributed to both &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\vec{B}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; in the formula. In this case, we must use the product rule to be able to set up the equation and continue solving for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;emf&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;emf = -(\frac{d}{dt} \vec{B})A \cdot B(\frac{d}{dt}A)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first term, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\frac{d}{dt}\vec{B})A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, represents Faraday&#039;s law and is nonzero of there is a varying magnetic field.&lt;br /&gt;
The second term, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;B(\frac{d}{dt}A)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, represents motional emf and is nonzero if there is a change in the amount of enclosed area.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the figure below, identify the following.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:a) Direction of magnetic field&lt;br /&gt;
:b) Direction of change in magnetic field, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{d\vec{B}}{dt}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:c) Direction of negative change in magnetic field, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;-\frac{d\vec{B}}{dt}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:d) Direction of current, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:e) Polarization of moving bar&lt;br /&gt;
:f) Direction of electric field inside bar due to polarization&lt;br /&gt;
:g) Direction of force on bar&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Example1.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
SOLUTION:&lt;br /&gt;
:a) Into the page&lt;br /&gt;
:: A circle with an &#039;x&#039; inside of it represents a vector into the page. A circle with a dot inside represents a vector out of the page.&lt;br /&gt;
:b) Into the page&lt;br /&gt;
:: Initially, at the time of the image, there are 4 circles representing magnetic field enclosed by the bars. However, as the bar moves, at some time t, the number of circles enclosed by the bar will increase; therefore, there is more magnetic field inside the loop. This means that the change in magnetic field is in the direction of the magnetic field. &lt;br /&gt;
:c) Out of the page&lt;br /&gt;
:: The negative change in magnetic field is in the opposite direction as change in magnetic field.&lt;br /&gt;
:d) Counterclockwise&lt;br /&gt;
:: Point your thumb in the direction of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;-\frac{d\vec{B}}{dt}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Your fingers will curl in the direction of current.&lt;br /&gt;
:e) Positive charges at the top, negative charges at the bottom&lt;br /&gt;
::The magnetic force on a particle is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\vec{F} = q\vec{v} \times \vec{B} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, so point your fingers in the direction of the velocity of the bar and curl them in the direction of magnetic field. The direction of your thumb is the direction of force on a positive particle.&lt;br /&gt;
:f) Down&lt;br /&gt;
::Positive charges have an electric field that points away from them while negative particles have an electric field that point towards them. If the top of the bar is positively charged, the field will point downward toward the negative particles.&lt;br /&gt;
:g) Left&lt;br /&gt;
::When a current is involved, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\vec{F} = I\vec{l} \times \vec{B}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, so point your fingers in the direction of the length of the bar (in the direction of current) and curl them in the direction of magnetic field. The direction of your thumb is the direction of force on the bar.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Medium===&lt;br /&gt;
A bar of length &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;L = 2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is moving across two other bars in a region of magnetic field, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;B = 0.0013T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; directed into the page. The bar is moving with a velocity of 10 m/s, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the width of the area enclosed. What is the magnitude of the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;emf&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; produced?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Example1.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
SOLUTION:&lt;br /&gt;
:Because the amount of magnetic field enclosed by the system is changing with time, we must use Faraday&#039;s Law: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;|emf| = \frac{d}{dt} \int\! \vec{B} \cdot \vec{n}dA&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:First, integrate through the formula: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;|emf| = \frac{d}{dt} \left(\vec{B} \cdot A\right)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Change in area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{A} = L\Delta{x}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:In this case, the distance &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is changing and resulting in a change in area, so the formula becomes: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;|emf| = \vec{B} \cdot L\frac{d}{dt}x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:The derivative of distance is velocity. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{dx}{dt} = v&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Therefore, |emf| in this problem is equal to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;BLv = .026 V &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
A long straight wire carrying current I = .3 A is moving with speed v = 5 m/s toward a small circular coil of radius R = .005 and 10 turns. The long wire is in the plane of the coil. The coil is very small, so that, at any fixed moment in time, you can neglect the spatial variation of the wire&#039;s magnetic field over the area of the coil.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Example2.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:a) Is the induced current in the coil flowing clockwise or counterclockwise?&lt;br /&gt;
:b) At the instant when the long wire is a distance x = 4 m from the center of the coil, determine the magnitude of the induced emf in the coil.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now consider the case where the wire is stationary and the coil is moving down parallel to the wire with a constant speed, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v = 2 m/s&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
:c) At the instant when the long wire is a distance x = 4 m from the center of the coil, determine the magnitude of the induced emf in the coil.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Exemploo3.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
SOLUTION:&lt;br /&gt;
:a) Counterclockwise&lt;br /&gt;
:: Using the right hand rule, if you point your thumb in the direction of current (+y), your fingers will curl in the direction of magnetic field. In this case, magnetic field is pointing into the page at the coil. At the location of the coil, the magnitude of the magnetic field due to the wire is increasing as the wire moves closer; therefore, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{d\vec{B}}{dt}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is pointing into the page, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;-\frac{d\vec{B}}{dt}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is pointing out of the page. If you point your thumb in the direction of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;-\frac{d\vec{B}}{dt}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, your fingers curl in the direction of the induced current. &lt;br /&gt;
:b) &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; |emf| = 1.47E-11 V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::After integrating Faraday&#039;s Law, we get &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;|emf| = \frac{d}{dt} (\vec{B} \cdot A)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::Notice that distance &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is changing with time.&lt;br /&gt;
::After doing this derivative, we get &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;|emf| = \frac{\mu_0IR^2v}{2x^2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::This is the magnitude of emf for &#039;&#039;&#039;one&#039;&#039;&#039; loop in the coil, so we have to multiply it by the number of loops, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;N&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;|emf| = \frac{N\mu_0IR^2v}{2x^2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:c) |emf| = 0&lt;br /&gt;
::Remember that the emf relies on a changing magnetic field, which was dependent on a changing &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; in the previous example. Now, however, the coil is moving parallel to the wire, meaning there is no change in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and no change in magnetic field.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
1. How is this topic connected to something that you are interested in?&lt;br /&gt;
:Believe it or not, Faraday&#039;s law can be applied to musical instruments such as the electric guitar. In many electric instruments, &#039;pickup coils&#039; sense the vibration of the strings, which causes variations in magnetic flux. These pickup coils often consist of magnet wrapped with a coil of copper wire, where the magnet creates a magnetic field and the vibrations of the string disturb the field, inducing a current in the coiled wire.&lt;br /&gt;
2. How is it connected to your major?&lt;br /&gt;
: I am a biomedical engineering student, and one application of Faraday&#039;s law in the medical field is transcranial magnetic stimulation. During this procedure, magnetic coils are used to stimulate small regions of the brain through electromagnetic induction. Current is discharged from a capacitor into the coil to produce pulsed magnetic fields. This technique can be used to evaluate and diagnose various conditions affecting the connection between the brain and muscles, including strokes and motor neuron diseases. It has also been said to alleviate the symptoms of major depressive disorder.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I am currently majoring in mechanical engineering, and in this field, we are required to work with both mechanics and circuit-like scenarios. Personally, I am interested in going into the car manufacturing industry, where motional emf plays a very important role. When you move an object through a magnetic field, it resists movement and generates electricity in the loop. If this is done with enough force, it could be used to stop a small car or roller-coaster.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Prior to 1831, the only known way to make an electric current flow through a conducting wire was to connect the ends of the wire to the positive and negative terminals of a battery. We know from the loop rule that around a closed loop, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V = emf = \oint \vec{E} \cdot d\vec{l} = 0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. However, Michael Faraday discovered through his experiments 2 ways in which current could be induced in a closed loop of wire in the absence of a battery: by changing the magnetic field around the loop, or by moving the loop through a constant magnetic field. In his first experiment, Faraday wrapped two wires around opposite sides of an iron ring and plugged one wire into a galvanometer and the other into a battery. He observed that when he held a bar magnet was held stationary with respect to the loop, the galvanometer did not read a current. However, when he moved the bar magnet towards or away from the loop, the galvanometer read a non-zero current. If a current is flowing, that means there must be some emf. Based off of the results of his experiments, Faraday eventually came up with a relationship telling us that the emf generated in a loop of wire in some magnetic field is proportional to the rate of change of the magnetic flux through the loop. This is what we know today as Faraday&#039;s law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You may want to explore the process of calculating motional emf before the use of Faraday&#039;s Law. Maxwell&#039;s equations and circuits with resistance are also relevant and may be worth looking into.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Motional emf problems can be pretty tricky depending on what the question is asking you to do. It&#039;s always a good idea to know how each formula came about, and how it can change bases on different scenarios. This includes the formula for resistance in a circuit, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V = IR&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. A problem could go as far as to give you a resistance for a circuit, ask you to solve for the potential difference, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, or &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;emf&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and then ask you to solve for the current as well.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lastly, I advise you to become familiar with Lenz&#039;s law because it gives the direction of the induced emf and current resulting from electromagnetic induction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:SparkNotes: SAT Physics&lt;br /&gt;
:Matter &amp;amp; Interactions, Vol. II: Electric and Magnetic Interactions, 4nd Edition by R. Chabay &amp;amp; B. Sherwood (John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons 2015) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;Video Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wgtw5lPKFXI&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;Text Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039; https://www.boundless.com/physics/textbooks/boundless-physics-textbook/induction-ac-circuits-and-electrical-technologies-22/magnetic-flux-induction-and-faraday-s-law-161/motional-emf-570-6257/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faraday%27s_law_of_induction&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/em/lectures/node43.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/elevol.html#c4&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pickup_(music_technology)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.physics.princeton.edu/~mcdonald/examples/guitar.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transcranial_magnetic_stimulation#Technical_information&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Faraday&#039;s Law]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Samigues3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Motional_Emf_using_Faraday%27s_Law&amp;diff=29493</id>
		<title>Motional Emf using Faraday&#039;s Law</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Motional_Emf_using_Faraday%27s_Law&amp;diff=29493"/>
		<updated>2017-11-25T03:22:56Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Samigues3: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;CLAIMED BY: Kasey Cockerill (Fall 2016)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chelsea Calhoun&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Motional emf can be calculated in terms of magnetic flux, where motional emf is quantitatively equal to the rate of change of the magnetic flux. If an enclosed magnetic field remains constant but the loop changes shape or orientation, the resulting change in area leads to a change in magnetic flux.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When a wire moves through an area of magnetic field, a current begins to flow along the wire as a result of magnetic forces. Originally, we learned to calculate the motional emf in a moving bar by using the equation  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;{\frac{q(\vec{v} \times \vec{B})L}{q}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where v is the velocity of the bar and L is the bar length. However, there&#039;s an easier way to do this: by writing an equation for emf in terms of magnetic flux.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Motional emf results when the area enclosing a constant magnetic field changes. Let&#039;s observe a specific scenario in which a bar of length L slides along two frictionless bars. We can observe the change in area over a short time as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{A} = L\Delta{x} = Lv\Delta{t}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. We already know that magnetic flux is defined by the formula: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi_m = \int\! \vec{B} \cdot\vec{n}dA&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. In the case that v is perpendicular to B, we combine these to get: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{\Delta{\Phi_m}}{\Delta{t}} = BLv &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Emf is said to be the work done per unit charge: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;emf = \frac{FL}{q} = \frac{qvBL}{q} = vBL&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (again, we are assuming v is perpendicular to B).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Comparing the above two formulas, we can clearly see that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;|{emf}| = |\frac{d\Phi_m}{dt}|&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. This is exactly what Faraday&#039;s Law tells us!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Faraday&#039;s Law is defined as:  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;emf = \int\! \vec{E} \cdot d\vec{l} = -\frac{d}{dt} \int\! \vec{B} \cdot \vec{n}dA&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\vec{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the Non-Coulomb electric field along the path, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;l&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the length of the path you&#039;re integrating on, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\vec{B}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the magnetic field inside the area enclosed, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\vec{n}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the unit vector perpendicular to area A.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[File:ExamplePic1.jpg]]&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the image shown above, a bar of length &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;L&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is moving along two other bars from right to left. The blue circles containing &amp;quot;x&amp;quot;s represent a magnetic field directed into the page. As the bar moves to the right, the system encloses a greater amount of magnetic field. To explain this concept more clearly, take a look at the figures below. This image shows a bar moving in a magnetic field at two different times. In the first picture, at time &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, the system encircles half of two individual magnetic field circles. However, in the second picture taken at time &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t_2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, the system now encircles 6 full magnetic field circles. Of course, this explanation isn&#039;t using technical terms, but the point still stands: the enclosed magnetic field is increasing as time increases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[File:ExamplePic2.jpg]]&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Returning to the scenario in the first image, because the magnetic field is not constant, we can use Faraday&#039;s Law to solve for the motional emf.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As stated above, the formula is as follows: &amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;emf =  -\frac{d}{dt} \int\! \vec{B} \cdot \vec{n}dA&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, integrate the integral with respect to the area of the rectangle enclosed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;emf = -\frac{d}{dt} (\vec{B} \cdot \vec{n}A)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We have the dimensions of the bar in variables: length &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;L&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and width &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Substitute these values for the area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;emf = -\frac{d}{dt} (\vec{B} \cdot \vec{n}(L)(x))&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now that we have this formula, we have to figure out how to take its derivative with respect to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Which of the magnitudes of these values is changing? &lt;br /&gt;
:::The magnitude of the magnetic field is constant. (More &amp;quot;circles&amp;quot; are added as time increases, but the magnitude of each &amp;quot;circle&amp;quot; does not change.&lt;br /&gt;
:::The magnitude of the normal vector is constant.&lt;br /&gt;
:::The length, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;L&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, of the bar is constant.&lt;br /&gt;
:::The width of the surface enclosed, &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;&#039;changes&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the formula now becomes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;emf = (\vec{B} \cdot \vec{n}(L))\left(-\frac{d}{dt}(x)\right)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this case, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{dx}{dt} = \vec{v}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; because &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a function of time, where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\vec{v}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the velocity of the moving bar. Substituting that in, we get:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;emf = (\vec{B} \cdot \vec{n}(L))\vec{v}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in these values, we can solve for the motional emf of the bar.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because the magnetic field is changing with time, however, there is also an induced current flowing through the circuit. We can find the direction of the current using the right hand rule. To do this, we can use 2 different methods:&lt;br /&gt;
: &#039;&#039;&#039;1.&#039;&#039;&#039; We can use the equation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\vec{F} = q\vec{v} \times \vec{B}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\vec{F}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the force on the bar, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\vec{v}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the velocity of the bar. Using the right hand rule, we can point our fingers in the direction of the velocity of the bar and curl them in the direction of the magnetic field. The direction that our thumb points is the direction of the force on a positive charge. In this case, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\vec{F}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; points upward, so the positive charges in the bar will move to the top, causing it to polarize with positive charges at the top and negative charges at the bottom. We can now visualize the bar as a battery that causes a current &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; to run out of the positive end. In this case, since the bar is polarized with the positive charges at the top, the current will flow out of the top of the bar and continue around the circuit. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;2.&#039;&#039;&#039; We can use the negative direction of the change in magnetic field, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;-\frac{dB}{dt}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; to find the direction of the current. To do this, make a diagram comparing the magnitude of the magnetic field enclosed at time &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and at time &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t_2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Then, draw an arrow representing the direction of change of the magnetic field. Now, flip the arrow to take the negative of that vector&#039;s direction. Using the right hand rule, point your thumb in the direction of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;-\frac{dB}{dt}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and the curl of your fingers will give you the direction of the induced current, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If  the magnetic field is NOT constant, meaning it changes with time, the derivative &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{d}{dt}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; will be distributed to both &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\vec{B}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; in the formula. In this case, we must use the product rule to be able to set up the equation and continue solving for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;emf&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;emf = -(\frac{d}{dt} \vec{B})A \cdot B(\frac{d}{dt}A)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It can also be written as&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;emf = -(\frac{d}{dt} \vec{B})A \cdot vBL&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first term, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\frac{d}{dt}\vec{B})A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, represents Faraday&#039;s law and is nonzero of there is a varying magnetic field.&lt;br /&gt;
The second term, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;B(\frac{d}{dt}A)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, represents motional emf and is nonzero if there is a change in the amount of enclosed area.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the figure below, identify the following.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:a) Direction of magnetic field&lt;br /&gt;
:b) Direction of change in magnetic field, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{d\vec{B}}{dt}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:c) Direction of negative change in magnetic field, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;-\frac{d\vec{B}}{dt}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:d) Direction of current, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:e) Polarization of moving bar&lt;br /&gt;
:f) Direction of electric field inside bar due to polarization&lt;br /&gt;
:g) Direction of force on bar&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Example1.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
SOLUTION:&lt;br /&gt;
:a) Into the page&lt;br /&gt;
:: A circle with an &#039;x&#039; inside of it represents a vector into the page. A circle with a dot inside represents a vector out of the page.&lt;br /&gt;
:b) Into the page&lt;br /&gt;
:: Initially, at the time of the image, there are 4 circles representing magnetic field enclosed by the bars. However, as the bar moves, at some time t, the number of circles enclosed by the bar will increase; therefore, there is more magnetic field inside the loop. This means that the change in magnetic field is in the direction of the magnetic field. &lt;br /&gt;
:c) Out of the page&lt;br /&gt;
:: The negative change in magnetic field is in the opposite direction as change in magnetic field.&lt;br /&gt;
:d) Counterclockwise&lt;br /&gt;
:: Point your thumb in the direction of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;-\frac{d\vec{B}}{dt}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Your fingers will curl in the direction of current.&lt;br /&gt;
:e) Positive charges at the top, negative charges at the bottom&lt;br /&gt;
::The magnetic force on a particle is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\vec{F} = q\vec{v} \times \vec{B} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, so point your fingers in the direction of the velocity of the bar and curl them in the direction of magnetic field. The direction of your thumb is the direction of force on a positive particle.&lt;br /&gt;
:f) Down&lt;br /&gt;
::Positive charges have an electric field that points away from them while negative particles have an electric field that point towards them. If the top of the bar is positively charged, the field will point downward toward the negative particles.&lt;br /&gt;
:g) Left&lt;br /&gt;
::When a current is involved, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\vec{F} = I\vec{l} \times \vec{B}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, so point your fingers in the direction of the length of the bar (in the direction of current) and curl them in the direction of magnetic field. The direction of your thumb is the direction of force on the bar.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Medium===&lt;br /&gt;
A bar of length &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;L = 2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is moving across two other bars in a region of magnetic field, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;B = 0.0013T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; directed into the page. The bar is moving with a velocity of 10 m/s, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the width of the area enclosed. What is the magnitude of the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;emf&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; produced?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Example1.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
SOLUTION:&lt;br /&gt;
:Because the amount of magnetic field enclosed by the system is changing with time, we must use Faraday&#039;s Law: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;|emf| = \frac{d}{dt} \int\! \vec{B} \cdot \vec{n}dA&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:First, integrate through the formula: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;|emf| = \frac{d}{dt} \left(\vec{B} \cdot A\right)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Change in area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{A} = L\Delta{x}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:In this case, the distance &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is changing and resulting in a change in area, so the formula becomes: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;|emf| = \vec{B} \cdot L\frac{d}{dt}x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:The derivative of distance is velocity. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{dx}{dt} = v&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Therefore, |emf| in this problem is equal to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;BLv = .026 V &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
A long straight wire carrying current I = .3 A is moving with speed v = 5 m/s toward a small circular coil of radius R = .005 and 10 turns. The long wire is in the plane of the coil. The coil is very small, so that, at any fixed moment in time, you can neglect the spatial variation of the wire&#039;s magnetic field over the area of the coil.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Example2.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:a) Is the induced current in the coil flowing clockwise or counterclockwise?&lt;br /&gt;
:b) At the instant when the long wire is a distance x = 4 m from the center of the coil, determine the magnitude of the induced emf in the coil.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now consider the case where the wire is stationary and the coil is moving down parallel to the wire with a constant speed, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v = 2 m/s&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
:c) At the instant when the long wire is a distance x = 4 m from the center of the coil, determine the magnitude of the induced emf in the coil.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Exemploo3.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
SOLUTION:&lt;br /&gt;
:a) Counterclockwise&lt;br /&gt;
:: Using the right hand rule, if you point your thumb in the direction of current (+y), your fingers will curl in the direction of magnetic field. In this case, magnetic field is pointing into the page at the coil. At the location of the coil, the magnitude of the magnetic field due to the wire is increasing as the wire moves closer; therefore, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{d\vec{B}}{dt}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is pointing into the page, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;-\frac{d\vec{B}}{dt}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is pointing out of the page. If you point your thumb in the direction of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;-\frac{d\vec{B}}{dt}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, your fingers curl in the direction of the induced current. &lt;br /&gt;
:b) &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; |emf| = 1.47E-11 V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::After integrating Faraday&#039;s Law, we get &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;|emf| = \frac{d}{dt} (\vec{B} \cdot A)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::Notice that distance &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is changing with time.&lt;br /&gt;
::After doing this derivative, we get &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;|emf| = \frac{\mu_0IR^2v}{2x^2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::This is the magnitude of emf for &#039;&#039;&#039;one&#039;&#039;&#039; loop in the coil, so we have to multiply it by the number of loops, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;N&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;|emf| = \frac{N\mu_0IR^2v}{2x^2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:c) |emf| = 0&lt;br /&gt;
::Remember that the emf relies on a changing magnetic field, which was dependent on a changing &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; in the previous example. Now, however, the coil is moving parallel to the wire, meaning there is no change in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and no change in magnetic field.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
1. How is this topic connected to something that you are interested in?&lt;br /&gt;
:Believe it or not, Faraday&#039;s law can be applied to musical instruments such as the electric guitar. In many electric instruments, &#039;pickup coils&#039; sense the vibration of the strings, which causes variations in magnetic flux. These pickup coils often consist of magnet wrapped with a coil of copper wire, where the magnet creates a magnetic field and the vibrations of the string disturb the field, inducing a current in the coiled wire.&lt;br /&gt;
2. How is it connected to your major?&lt;br /&gt;
: I am a biomedical engineering student, and one application of Faraday&#039;s law in the medical field is transcranial magnetic stimulation. During this procedure, magnetic coils are used to stimulate small regions of the brain through electromagnetic induction. Current is discharged from a capacitor into the coil to produce pulsed magnetic fields. This technique can be used to evaluate and diagnose various conditions affecting the connection between the brain and muscles, including strokes and motor neuron diseases. It has also been said to alleviate the symptoms of major depressive disorder.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I am currently majoring in mechanical engineering, and in this field, we are required to work with both mechanics and circuit-like scenarios. Personally, I am interested in going into the car manufacturing industry, where motional emf plays a very important role. When you move an object through a magnetic field, it resists movement and generates electricity in the loop. If this is done with enough force, it could be used to stop a small car or roller-coaster.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Prior to 1831, the only known way to make an electric current flow through a conducting wire was to connect the ends of the wire to the positive and negative terminals of a battery. We know from the loop rule that around a closed loop, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V = emf = \oint \vec{E} \cdot d\vec{l} = 0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. However, Michael Faraday discovered through his experiments 2 ways in which current could be induced in a closed loop of wire in the absence of a battery: by changing the magnetic field around the loop, or by moving the loop through a constant magnetic field. In his first experiment, Faraday wrapped two wires around opposite sides of an iron ring and plugged one wire into a galvanometer and the other into a battery. He observed that when he held a bar magnet was held stationary with respect to the loop, the galvanometer did not read a current. However, when he moved the bar magnet towards or away from the loop, the galvanometer read a non-zero current. If a current is flowing, that means there must be some emf. Based off of the results of his experiments, Faraday eventually came up with a relationship telling us that the emf generated in a loop of wire in some magnetic field is proportional to the rate of change of the magnetic flux through the loop. This is what we know today as Faraday&#039;s law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You may want to explore the process of calculating motional emf before the use of Faraday&#039;s Law. Maxwell&#039;s equations and circuits with resistance are also relevant and may be worth looking into.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Motional emf problems can be pretty tricky depending on what the question is asking you to do. It&#039;s always a good idea to know how each formula came about, and how it can change bases on different scenarios. This includes the formula for resistance in a circuit, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V = IR&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. A problem could go as far as to give you a resistance for a circuit, ask you to solve for the potential difference, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, or &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;emf&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and then ask you to solve for the current as well.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lastly, I advise you to become familiar with Lenz&#039;s law because it gives the direction of the induced emf and current resulting from electromagnetic induction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:SparkNotes: SAT Physics&lt;br /&gt;
:Matter &amp;amp; Interactions, Vol. II: Electric and Magnetic Interactions, 4nd Edition by R. Chabay &amp;amp; B. Sherwood (John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons 2015) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;Video Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wgtw5lPKFXI&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;Text Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039; https://www.boundless.com/physics/textbooks/boundless-physics-textbook/induction-ac-circuits-and-electrical-technologies-22/magnetic-flux-induction-and-faraday-s-law-161/motional-emf-570-6257/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faraday%27s_law_of_induction&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/em/lectures/node43.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/elevol.html#c4&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pickup_(music_technology)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.physics.princeton.edu/~mcdonald/examples/guitar.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transcranial_magnetic_stimulation#Technical_information&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Faraday&#039;s Law]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Samigues3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Motional_Emf_using_Faraday%27s_Law&amp;diff=29492</id>
		<title>Motional Emf using Faraday&#039;s Law</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Motional_Emf_using_Faraday%27s_Law&amp;diff=29492"/>
		<updated>2017-11-25T03:22:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Samigues3: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;CLAIMED BY: Kasey Cockerill (Fall 2016)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chelsea Calhoun&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Motional emf can be calculated in terms of magnetic flux, where motional emf is quantitatively equal to the rate of change of the magnetic flux. If an enclosed magnetic field remains constant but the loop changes shape or orientation, the resulting change in area leads to a change in magnetic flux.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When a wire moves through an area of magnetic field, a current begins to flow along the wire as a result of magnetic forces. Originally, we learned to calculate the motional emf in a moving bar by using the equation  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;{\frac{q(\vec{v} \times \vec{B})L}{q}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where v is the velocity of the bar and L is the bar length. However, there&#039;s an easier way to do this: by writing an equation for emf in terms of magnetic flux.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Motional emf results when the area enclosing a constant magnetic field changes. Let&#039;s observe a specific scenario in which a bar of length L slides along two frictionless bars. We can observe the change in area over a short time as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{A} = L\Delta{x} = Lv\Delta{t}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. We already know that magnetic flux is defined by the formula: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi_m = \int\! \vec{B} \cdot\vec{n}dA&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. In the case that v is perpendicular to B, we combine these to get: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{\Delta{\Phi_m}}{\Delta{t}} = BLv &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Emf is said to be the work done per unit charge: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;emf = \frac{FL}{q} = \frac{qvBL}{q} = vBL&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (again, we are assuming v is perpendicular to B).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Comparing the above two formulas, we can clearly see that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;|{emf}| = |\frac{d\Phi_m}{dt}|&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. This is exactly what Faraday&#039;s Law tells us!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Faraday&#039;s Law is defined as:  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;emf = \int\! \vec{E} \cdot d\vec{l} = -\frac{d}{dt} \int\! \vec{B} \cdot \vec{n}dA&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\vec{E}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the Non-Coulomb electric field along the path, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;l&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the length of the path you&#039;re integrating on, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\vec{B}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the magnetic field inside the area enclosed, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\vec{n}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the unit vector perpendicular to area A.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[File:ExamplePic1.jpg]]&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the image shown above, a bar of length &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;L&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is moving along two other bars from right to left. The blue circles containing &amp;quot;x&amp;quot;s represent a magnetic field directed into the page. As the bar moves to the right, the system encloses a greater amount of magnetic field. To explain this concept more clearly, take a look at the figures below. This image shows a bar moving in a magnetic field at two different times. In the first picture, at time &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, the system encircles half of two individual magnetic field circles. However, in the second picture taken at time &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t_2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, the system now encircles 6 full magnetic field circles. Of course, this explanation isn&#039;t using technical terms, but the point still stands: the enclosed magnetic field is increasing as time increases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[File:ExamplePic2.jpg]]&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Returning to the scenario in the first image, because the magnetic field is not constant, we can use Faraday&#039;s Law to solve for the motional emf.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As stated above, the formula is as follows: &amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;emf =  -\frac{d}{dt} \int\! \vec{B} \cdot \vec{n}dA&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, integrate the integral with respect to the area of the rectangle enclosed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;emf = -\frac{d}{dt} (\vec{B} \cdot \vec{n}A)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We have the dimensions of the bar in variables: length &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;L&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and width &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Substitute these values for the area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;emf = -\frac{d}{dt} (\vec{B} \cdot \vec{n}(L)(x))&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now that we have this formula, we have to figure out how to take its derivative with respect to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Which of the magnitudes of these values is changing? &lt;br /&gt;
:::The magnitude of the magnetic field is constant. (More &amp;quot;circles&amp;quot; are added as time increases, but the magnitude of each &amp;quot;circle&amp;quot; does not change.&lt;br /&gt;
:::The magnitude of the normal vector is constant.&lt;br /&gt;
:::The length, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;L&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, of the bar is constant.&lt;br /&gt;
:::The width of the surface enclosed, &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;&#039;changes&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the formula now becomes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;emf = (\vec{B} \cdot \vec{n}(L))\left(-\frac{d}{dt}(x)\right)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this case, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{dx}{dt} = \vec{v}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; because &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a function of time, where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\vec{v}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the velocity of the moving bar. Substituting that in, we get:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;emf = (\vec{B} \cdot \vec{n}(L))\vec{v}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in these values, we can solve for the motional emf of the bar.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because the magnetic field is changing with time, however, there is also an induced current flowing through the circuit. We can find the direction of the current using the right hand rule. To do this, we can use 2 different methods:&lt;br /&gt;
: &#039;&#039;&#039;1.&#039;&#039;&#039; We can use the equation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\vec{F} = q\vec{v} \times \vec{B}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\vec{F}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the force on the bar, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\vec{v}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the velocity of the bar. Using the right hand rule, we can point our fingers in the direction of the velocity of the bar and curl them in the direction of the magnetic field. The direction that our thumb points is the direction of the force on a positive charge. In this case, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\vec{F}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; points upward, so the positive charges in the bar will move to the top, causing it to polarize with positive charges at the top and negative charges at the bottom. We can now visualize the bar as a battery that causes a current &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; to run out of the positive end. In this case, since the bar is polarized with the positive charges at the top, the current will flow out of the top of the bar and continue around the circuit. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;2.&#039;&#039;&#039; We can use the negative direction of the change in magnetic field, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;-\frac{dB}{dt}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; to find the direction of the current. To do this, make a diagram comparing the magnitude of the magnetic field enclosed at time &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and at time &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t_2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Then, draw an arrow representing the direction of change of the magnetic field. Now, flip the arrow to take the negative of that vector&#039;s direction. Using the right hand rule, point your thumb in the direction of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;-\frac{dB}{dt}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and the curl of your fingers will give you the direction of the induced current, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If  the magnetic field is NOT constant, meaning it changes with time, the derivative &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{d}{dt}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; will be distributed to both &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\vec{B}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; in the formula. In this case, we must use the product rule to be able to set up the equation and continue solving for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;emf&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;emf = -(\frac{d}{dt} \vec{B})A \cdot B(\frac{d}{dt}A)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It can also be written as&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;emf = -(\frac{d}{dt} \vec{B})A \cdot vBL&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first term, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\frac{d}{dt}\vec{B})A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, represents Faraday&#039;s law and is nonzero of there is a varying magnetic field.&lt;br /&gt;
The second term, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;B(\frac{d}{dt}A)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, represents motional emf and is nonzero if there is a change in the amount of enclosed area.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
Using the figure below, identify the following.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:a) Direction of magnetic field&lt;br /&gt;
:b) Direction of change in magnetic field, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{d\vec{B}}{dt}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:c) Direction of negative change in magnetic field, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;-\frac{d\vec{B}}{dt}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:d) Direction of current, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:e) Polarization of moving bar&lt;br /&gt;
:f) Direction of electric field inside bar due to polarization&lt;br /&gt;
:g) Direction of force on bar&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Example1.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
SOLUTION:&lt;br /&gt;
:a) Into the page&lt;br /&gt;
:: A circle with an &#039;x&#039; inside of it represents a vector into the page. A circle with a dot inside represents a vector out of the page.&lt;br /&gt;
:b) Into the page&lt;br /&gt;
:: Initially, at the time of the image, there are 4 circles representing magnetic field enclosed by the bars. However, as the bar moves, at some time t, the number of circles enclosed by the bar will increase; therefore, there is more magnetic field inside the loop. This means that the change in magnetic field is in the direction of the magnetic field. &lt;br /&gt;
:c) Out of the page&lt;br /&gt;
:: The negative change in magnetic field is in the opposite direction as change in magnetic field.&lt;br /&gt;
:d) Counterclockwise&lt;br /&gt;
:: Point your thumb in the direction of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;-\frac{d\vec{B}}{dt}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Your fingers will curl in the direction of current.&lt;br /&gt;
:e) Positive charges at the top, negative charges at the bottom&lt;br /&gt;
::The magnetic force on a particle is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\vec{F} = q\vec{v} \times \vec{B} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, so point your fingers in the direction of the velocity of the bar and curl them in the direction of magnetic field. The direction of your thumb is the direction of force on a positive particle.&lt;br /&gt;
:f) Down&lt;br /&gt;
::Positive charges have an electric field that points away from them while negative particles have an electric field that point towards them. If the top of the bar is positively charged, the field will point downward toward the negative particles.&lt;br /&gt;
:g) Left&lt;br /&gt;
::When a current is involved, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\vec{F} = I\vec{l} \times \vec{B}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, so point your fingers in the direction of the length of the bar (in the direction of current) and curl them in the direction of magnetic field. The direction of your thumb is the direction of force on the bar.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Medium===&lt;br /&gt;
A bar of length &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;L = 2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is moving across two other bars in a region of magnetic field, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;B = 0.0013T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; directed into the page. The bar is moving with a velocity of 10 m/s, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the width of the area enclosed. What is the magnitude of the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;emf&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; produced?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Example1.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
SOLUTION:&lt;br /&gt;
:Because the amount of magnetic field enclosed by the system is changing with time, we must use Faraday&#039;s Law: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;|emf| = \frac{d}{dt} \int\! \vec{B} \cdot \vec{n}dA&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:First, integrate through the formula: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;|emf| = \frac{d}{dt} \left(\vec{B} \cdot A\right)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Change in area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{A} = L\Delta{x}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:In this case, the distance &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is changing and resulting in a change in area, so the formula becomes: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;|emf| = \vec{B} \cdot L\frac{d}{dt}x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:The derivative of distance is velocity. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{dx}{dt} = v&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Therefore, |emf| in this problem is equal to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;BLv = .026 V &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
A long straight wire carrying current I = .3 A is moving with speed v = 5 m/s toward a small circular coil of radius R = .005 and 10 turns. The long wire is in the plane of the coil. The coil is very small, so that, at any fixed moment in time, you can neglect the spatial variation of the wire&#039;s magnetic field over the area of the coil.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Example2.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:a) Is the induced current in the coil flowing clockwise or counterclockwise?&lt;br /&gt;
:b) At the instant when the long wire is a distance x = 4 m from the center of the coil, determine the magnitude of the induced emf in the coil.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now consider the case where the wire is stationary and the coil is moving down parallel to the wire with a constant speed, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v = 2 m/s&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
:c) At the instant when the long wire is a distance x = 4 m from the center of the coil, determine the magnitude of the induced emf in the coil.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Exemploo3.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
SOLUTION:&lt;br /&gt;
:a) Counterclockwise&lt;br /&gt;
:: Using the right hand rule, if you point your thumb in the direction of current (+y), your fingers will curl in the direction of magnetic field. In this case, magnetic field is pointing into the page at the coil. At the location of the coil, the magnitude of the magnetic field due to the wire is increasing as the wire moves closer; therefore, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{d\vec{B}}{dt}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is pointing into the page, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;-\frac{d\vec{B}}{dt}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is pointing out of the page. If you point your thumb in the direction of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;-\frac{d\vec{B}}{dt}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, your fingers curl in the direction of the induced current. &lt;br /&gt;
:b) &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; |emf| = 1.47E-11 V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::After integrating Faraday&#039;s Law, we get &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;|emf| = \frac{d}{dt} (\vec{B} \cdot A)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::Notice that distance &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is changing with time.&lt;br /&gt;
::After doing this derivative, we get &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;|emf| = \frac{\mu_0IR^2v}{2x^2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::This is the magnitude of emf for &#039;&#039;&#039;one&#039;&#039;&#039; loop in the coil, so we have to multiply it by the number of loops, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;N&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;|emf| = \frac{N\mu_0IR^2v}{2x^2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:c) |emf| = 0&lt;br /&gt;
::Remember that the emf relies on a changing magnetic field, which was dependent on a changing &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; in the previous example. Now, however, the coil is moving parallel to the wire, meaning there is no change in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and no change in magnetic field.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
1. How is this topic connected to something that you are interested in?&lt;br /&gt;
:Believe it or not, Faraday&#039;s law can be applied to musical instruments such as the electric guitar. In many electric instruments, &#039;pickup coils&#039; sense the vibration of the strings, which causes variations in magnetic flux. These pickup coils often consist of magnet wrapped with a coil of copper wire, where the magnet creates a magnetic field and the vibrations of the string disturb the field, inducing a current in the coiled wire.&lt;br /&gt;
2. How is it connected to your major?&lt;br /&gt;
: I am a biomedical engineering student, and one application of Faraday&#039;s law in the medical field is transcranial magnetic stimulation. During this procedure, magnetic coils are used to stimulate small regions of the brain through electromagnetic induction. Current is discharged from a capacitor into the coil to produce pulsed magnetic fields. This technique can be used to evaluate and diagnose various conditions affecting the connection between the brain and muscles, including strokes and motor neuron diseases. It has also been said to alleviate the symptoms of major depressive disorder.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I am currently majoring in mechanical engineering, and in this field, we are required to work with both mechanics and circuit-like scenarios. Personally, I am interested in going into the car manufacturing industry, where motional emf plays a very important role. When you move an object through a magnetic field, it resists movement and generates electricity in the loop. If this is done with enough force, it could be used to stop a small car or roller-coaster.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Prior to 1831, the only known way to make an electric current flow through a conducting wire was to connect the ends of the wire to the positive and negative terminals of a battery. We know from the loop rule that around a closed loop, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V = emf = \oint \vec{E} \cdot d\vec{l} = 0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. However, Michael Faraday discovered through his experiments 2 ways in which current could be induced in a closed loop of wire in the absence of a battery: by changing the magnetic field around the loop, or by moving the loop through a constant magnetic field. In his first experiment, Faraday wrapped two wires around opposite sides of an iron ring and plugged one wire into a galvanometer and the other into a battery. He observed that when he held a bar magnet was held stationary with respect to the loop, the galvanometer did not read a current. However, when he moved the bar magnet towards or away from the loop, the galvanometer read a non-zero current. If a current is flowing, that means there must be some emf. Based off of the results of his experiments, Faraday eventually came up with a relationship telling us that the emf generated in a loop of wire in some magnetic field is proportional to the rate of change of the magnetic flux through the loop. This is what we know today as Faraday&#039;s law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You may want to explore the process of calculating motional emf before the use of Faraday&#039;s Law. Maxwell&#039;s equations and circuits with resistance are also relevant and may be worth looking into.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Motional emf problems can be pretty tricky depending on what the question is asking you to do. It&#039;s always a good idea to know how each formula came about, and how it can change bases on different scenarios. This includes the formula for resistance in a circuit, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V = IR&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. A problem could go as far as to give you a resistance for a circuit, ask you to solve for the potential difference, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, or &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;emf&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and then ask you to solve for the current as well.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lastly, I advise you to become familiar with Lenz&#039;s law because it gives the direction of the induced emf and current resulting from electromagnetic induction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:SparkNotes: SAT Physics&lt;br /&gt;
:Matter &amp;amp; Interactions, Vol. II: Electric and Magnetic Interactions, 4nd Edition by R. Chabay &amp;amp; B. Sherwood (John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons 2015) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;Video Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wgtw5lPKFXI&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;Text Explanation:&#039;&#039;&#039; https://www.boundless.com/physics/textbooks/boundless-physics-textbook/induction-ac-circuits-and-electrical-technologies-22/magnetic-flux-induction-and-faraday-s-law-161/motional-emf-570-6257/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faraday%27s_law_of_induction&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/em/lectures/node43.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/elevol.html#c4&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pickup_(music_technology)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.physics.princeton.edu/~mcdonald/examples/guitar.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transcranial_magnetic_stimulation#Technical_information&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Faraday&#039;s Law]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Samigues3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Elastic_Collisions&amp;diff=28087</id>
		<title>Elastic Collisions</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Elastic_Collisions&amp;diff=28087"/>
		<updated>2017-04-09T19:27:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Samigues3: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;CLAIMED BY SEAN FISCHER AND EDITED BY SOLANGE AMIGUES&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So what exactly is an elastic collision?  I know you’re thinking, “Oh I know all about elasticity,” but LOL this is not bubble gum or rubber bands guys!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, we need to define a collision. A collision is an event/process in which two objects interact strongly for a short amount of time and in which there was very little interaction before they interacted and after the interaction. An elastic collision is a collision between two or more objects in which there is no loss in kinetic energy before and after the collision. If we assume that the colliding objects are part of the system and that there is no force from the surroundings, the final kinetic energy is still in the same form as it was initially. This is because the surrounding forces are considered to have a negligible impact compared to the forces that occur between the colliding objects. To keep it simple, this means that kinetic energy in= kinetic energy out. Usually, you can determine if a collision is elastic or not by seeing if the objects bounce off one another, unlike inelastic collisions. To find the difference between the two types of collisions, keep in mind that momentum is transferred for both of them so the best way of differentiating would be to look at the transfer of kinetic energy. If the difference of internal and kinetic energy is equal to zero, then it is elastic. Apart from looking to see if the objects bounce off another or not, we can also judge by looking to see if the objects get deformed, are hotter, have more vibration/rotation or are in an excited state after collision. If any of the above happens, the collision is &#039;&#039;&#039;not&#039;&#039;&#039; elastic. Remember how your parents always told you what goes in must come out? They were talking about elastic collisions... probably. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, elastic collisions are a wonderful representation of the conservation of momentum which states that the momentum of an isolated system is constant. For an isolated system undergoing an elastic collision momentum in = momentum out. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And I love playing pool because every time a ball hits another and they bounce off one another I’m witnessing an elastic collision so basically I’m a physicist in the lab. The image below demonstrates the main idea of an elastic collision. Boing!! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It&#039;s important to note that with macroscopic systems there are no perfectly elastic collisions because there&#039;s always at least a dab of dissipation (like some thermal energy given off), but most are nearly elastic. The only time there are perfect collisions is on a microscopic level when atomic systems with quantized energy collide, but that&#039;s only if there is enough energy available to raise the systems to an excited quantum state-- but quantum energy is really a whole other topic. Let&#039;s focus on elastic collisions!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
                                                     [[File: boing.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
                         [[File:Elastischer_stoß2.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Check out this funny video on elastic collisions also! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9EqU1_DXUw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now check out this more informative video on elastic collisions: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4vzNk4qppw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now lets take what we know about elastic collisions and talk about it in mathematical terms. There are three main mathematical concepts surrounding elastic collisions:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: CodeCogsEqn.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_9.36.09_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Or you can simply say:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: CodeCogsEqn copy.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_9.11.11_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: CodeCogsEqn_copy_2.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Example Problem&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cart 1, moving in the positive x direction, collides with cart 2 moving in the negative x direction. Both carts have identical masses and the collisions is (nearly) elastic, as it would be if the carts interacted magnetically or repelled each other through soft springs. What are the final momenta of the two carts?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Example1good.jpg|350px|thumb|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. After choosing a correct system, surroundings, and initial and final states, we can apply the momentum principle mentioned above to get a relationship&lt;br /&gt;
between the initial and final momentums of the two carts.  Usually, when we want to consider the system, we will consider the two colliding objects as the system and the rest as the surroundings. The initial state would be before the collision, and the final state would be after.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Momentum Principle:[[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_9.56.06_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And it turns into: [[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_10.03.50_AM.png]] since during the collision, the Fnet is negligible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Next, by applying the energy principle we can gain knowledge about the final and initial kinetic energies. By acknowledging the fact that the change in internal energy is 0 and the fact the reaction happens so quickly that not work or heat transfer is done by the surroundings, the equation can be simplified to include just initial and final kinetic energies. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Energy Principle: [[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_10.51.29_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We then get rid of the work, heat transfer and internal energies: [[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_11.04.06_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The reason the internal energies are directly crossed out is because we can put them to one side and since Efinal=Einitial, Efinal-Einitial=0.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Once we have simplified the momentum and energy principles, one can use the relationship between kinetic energy and momentum mentioned above to get a relationship involving both energy and momentum. Once this is obtained, the equation can be shifted around to get both the final momentums.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kinetic Energy Definition: [[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_11.10.01_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finished Result: [[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_11.12.35_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The link below demonstrates a basic car crash elastic collision using MATLAB. Take note of the changes in displacement and the time. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AfCfCS6O2VM Elastic Collision MATLAB model]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Be sure to show all steps in your solution and include diagrams whenever possible. For a lot of the complicated problems, starting with a diagram and writing down the given information and plugging that into either the momentum or energy principle can help you move forward in the problem. It would be better to also write the main principles at the side to remind yourself of how you found it.  If you still get stuck, try finding similar examples to that problem and look at the solutions to get on the right track.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let’s start with a simple example like the ones you don&#039;t see on the test. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jay and Sarah are best friends. Since they’re best friends they both weigh 55 kg. Jay hadn’t seen Sarah in a long time so when she saw her she ran to her with a velocity of &amp;lt;4,0,0&amp;gt; m/s. Instead of a hug, they were both too excited and collided and bounced back off of each other, and Sarah flew back with a velocity of &amp;lt;7,0,0&amp;gt; m/s. What was Jay’s final velocity?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Problem1.0.png|300px|Problem 1]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a lot of simple elastic collision problems, the momentum principle is all you need to solve them. Most problems will the initial velocities, masses, and one final velocity and you will be asked to solve for a either a final velocity or final momentum. By setting up an equation like the one in this problem, one can easily handle this type of problem.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When far apart, the momentum of a proton is &amp;lt;5.2 ✕ 10−21, 0, 0&amp;gt; kg · m/s as it approaches another proton that is initially at rest. The two protons repel each other electrically, but they are not close enough to touch. When they are far apart again later, one of the protons now has a velocity of &amp;lt;1.75, .82, 0&amp;gt; m/s. At that instant, what is the momentum of the other proton? HINT: Mass of proton is 1.7 *10^-21 kg.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Problem2.0.png|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A lot of people freak out when they see problems involving atomic particles and electrical forces, but the concept is the same no matter the scale. For this problem we are given masses, velocities, and momentum, but the equation p = mv allows us to easily handle these different values. Once again drawing a diagram helps to understand what is actually happening in the problem, making it easier to put the values in the correct places and solve.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Okay, let&#039;s get a little bit trickier here...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a 400 kg train traveling at 55 m/s that collides, elastically of course, with a random 2 kg trashcan that&#039;s stationary on the tracks. So afterwards, what are the speeds of both the train and the trashcan after the collision?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Problem3.0.png|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This was a difficult problem because of the assumptions we had to make in order to solve it. Because the collision was elastic we were able to disregard the change in internal energy in the energy principle, and since it happened so quickly the work done by the track and heat transfer between the surroundings was negligible. It is tough to tell what assumptions you can make and which ones you can&#039;t in problems like these, which is what can make them difficult. On most exams or quizzes the collision problems will be inelastic simply because they are harder, but it is important to understand the fundementals of elastic collisions and how to solve problems involving them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So how are collisions connected to the real world? Collisions are all around us! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One main example is cars! Lots of car companies will purposely test and wreck cars to test collisions! Data is then sent to places like the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety where we can learn about car agility and more. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:crash-test.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another example of collisions in real life is billiards. This is one of the most accurate real life examples of elastic collisions. One ball hits another ball at rest, and if done right the first ball stops and transfers nearly all its kinetic energy into kinetic energy in the second ball. We consider this a head on collision of equal masses. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Pool1.0.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A third example is hitting a baseball. Hitting a ball off the end or to close the hands of a bat will cause some vibrational energy from the collision, but if the ball catches the sweet spot the collision is very elastic, and you don&#039;t feel any vibration when you strike the ball.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Hittingabaseball.jpg|500px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Elastic collisions also happen between particles. The Rutherford Scattering experiment mentioned below is a good example. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Collisions are certainly not a knew concept in the world. Ever since the beginning or time things have been colliding and reacting in different ways. It was experiments done by scientists like Newton or Rutherford that started to characterize collisions into categories and apply fundamental principles of physics to the reactions. What we observed above was the Newtonian way.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The history of collisions originates from the Rutherford Scattering experiment. It consisted of shooting alpha particles through a thin gold foil. As Rutherford studied the scattering of alpha particles through metal foils, he first noticed a collision with a single massive positive particle. Although the alpha particles did not hit the nucleus of the gold atoms, they did interact with each other and therefore can be considered as a collision. Since the interaction did not excite the gold atoms, fortunately enough, it was an elastic collision. This lead to the conclusion that the positive charge of the mass was concentrated in the center, the atomic nucleus! The plum pudding model (where the positive and negative charges were stuck within the atom like plums in a pudding), that had been around was disproved. When further research was done, they measured the angle of the &#039;scattering&#039; or the particles shot through a tin gold foil. Had the collisions been inelastic, the particles would not have been able to bounce back. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:gold-foil-experiment.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5pZj0u_XMbc] is a youtube clip detailing the experiment:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://physicsbook.gatech.edu/Collisions for a general understanding of all collisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://physicsbook.gatech.edu/inelastic_collisions to contrast them from elastic collisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.britannica.com/science/elastic-collision&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.physicsclassroom.com/mmedia/momentum/trece.cfm]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/elacol2.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.boundless.com/physics/textbooks/boundless-physics-textbook/linear-momentum-and-collisions-7/collisions-70/elastic-collisions-in-one-dimension-298-6220/]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Main Idea:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Matter and Interactions, 4th Edition&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.sparknotes.com/testprep/books/sat2/physics/chapter9section4.rhtml&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://blogs.bu.edu/ggarber/archive/bua-physics/collisions-and-conservation-of-momentum/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
History:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Matter and Interactions, 4th Edition&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elastic_collision&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5pZj0u_XMbc&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Connectedness:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.iihs.org/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally used references from &#039;&#039;see also&#039;&#039;.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Samigues3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Elastic_Collisions&amp;diff=28063</id>
		<title>Elastic Collisions</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Elastic_Collisions&amp;diff=28063"/>
		<updated>2017-04-09T18:51:41Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Samigues3: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;CLAIMED BY SEAN FISCHER AND EDITED BY SOLANGE AMIGUES&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So what exactly is an elastic collision?  I know you’re thinking, “Oh I know all about elasticity,” but LOL this is not bubble gum or rubber bands guys!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An elastic collision is a collision between two or more objects in which there is no loss in kinetic energy before and after the collision. If we assume that the colliding objects are part of the system and that there is no force from the surroundings, the final kinetic energy is still in the same form as it was initially. This is because the surrounding forces are considered to have a negligible impact compared to the forces that occur between the colliding objects. To keep it simple, this means that kinetic energy in= kinetic energy out. Usually, you can determine if a collision is elastic or not by seeing if the objects bounce off one another and/or to not get stuck together after collision (the latter would be an inelastic collision). Remember how your parents always told you what goes in must come out? They were talking about elastic collisions... probably. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, elastic collisions are a wonderful representation of the conservation of momentum which states that the momentum of an isolated system is constant. For an isolated system undergoing an elastic collision momentum in = momentum out. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And I love playing pool because every time a ball hits another and they bounce off one another I’m witnessing an elastic collision so basically I’m a physicist in the lab. The image below demonstrates the main idea of an elastic collision. Boing!! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It&#039;s important to note that with macroscopic systems there are no perfectly elastic collisions because there&#039;s always at least a dab of dissipation (like some thermal energy given off), but most are nearly elastic. The only time there are perfect collisions is on a microscopic level when atomic systems with quantized energy collide, but that&#039;s only if there is enough energy available to raise the systems to an excited quantum state-- but quantum energy is really a whole other topic. Let&#039;s focus on elastic collisions!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
                                                     [[File: boing.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
                         [[File:Elastischer_stoß2.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Check out this funny video on elastic collisions also! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9EqU1_DXUw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now check out this more informative video on elastic collisions: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4vzNk4qppw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now lets take what we know about elastic collisions and talk about it in mathematical terms. There are three main mathematical concepts surrounding elastic collisions:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: CodeCogsEqn.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_9.36.09_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Or you can simply say:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: CodeCogsEqn copy.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_9.11.11_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: CodeCogsEqn_copy_2.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Example Problem&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cart 1, moving in the positive x direction, collides with cart 2 moving in the negative x direction. Both carts have identical masses and the collisions is (nearly) elastic, as it would be if the carts interacted magnetically or repelled each other through soft springs. What are the final momenta of the two carts?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Example1good.jpg|350px|thumb|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. After choosing a correct system, surroundings, and initial and final states, we can apply the momentum principle mentioned above to get a relationship&lt;br /&gt;
between the initial and final momentums of the two carts.  Usually, when we want to consider the system, we will consider the two colliding objects as the system and the rest as the surroundings. The initial state would be before the collision, and the final state would be after.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Momentum Principle:[[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_9.56.06_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And it turns into: [[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_10.03.50_AM.png]] since during the collision, the Fnet is negligible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Next, by applying the energy principle we can gain knowledge about the final and initial kinetic energies. By acknowledging the fact that the change in internal energy is 0 and the fact the reaction happens so quickly that not work or heat transfer is done by the surroundings, the equation can be simplified to include just initial and final kinetic energies. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Energy Principle: [[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_10.51.29_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We then get rid of the work, heat transfer and internal energies: [[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_11.04.06_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The reason the internal energies are directly crossed out is because we can put them to one side and since Efinal=Einitial, Efinal-Einitial=0.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Once we have simplified the momentum and energy principles, one can use the relationship between kinetic energy and momentum mentioned above to get a relationship involving both energy and momentum. Once this is obtained, the equation can be shifted around to get both the final momentums.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kinetic Energy Definition: [[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_11.10.01_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finished Result: [[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_11.12.35_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The link below demonstrates a basic car crash elastic collision using MATLAB. Take note of the changes in displacement and the time. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AfCfCS6O2VM Elastic Collision MATLAB model]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Be sure to show all steps in your solution and include diagrams whenever possible. For a lot of the complicated problems, starting with a diagram and writing down the given information and plugging that into either the momentum or energy principle can help you move forward in the problem. It would be better to also write the main principles at the side to remind yourself of how you found it.  If you still get stuck, try finding similar examples to that problem and look at the solutions to get on the right track.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let’s start with a simple example like the ones you don&#039;t see on the test. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jay and Sarah are best friends. Since they’re best friends they both weigh 55 kg. Jay hadn’t seen Sarah in a long time so when she saw her she ran to her with a velocity of &amp;lt;4,0,0&amp;gt; m/s. Instead of a hug, they were both too excited and collided and bounced back off of each other, and Sarah flew back with a velocity of &amp;lt;7,0,0&amp;gt; m/s. What was Jay’s final velocity?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Problem1.0.png|300px|Problem 1]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a lot of simple elastic collision problems, the momentum principle is all you need to solve them. Most problems will the initial velocities, masses, and one final velocity and you will be asked to solve for a either a final velocity or final momentum. By setting up an equation like the one in this problem, one can easily handle this type of problem.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When far apart, the momentum of a proton is &amp;lt;5.2 ✕ 10−21, 0, 0&amp;gt; kg · m/s as it approaches another proton that is initially at rest. The two protons repel each other electrically, but they are not close enough to touch. When they are far apart again later, one of the protons now has a velocity of &amp;lt;1.75, .82, 0&amp;gt; m/s. At that instant, what is the momentum of the other proton? HINT: Mass of proton is 1.7 *10^-21 kg.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Problem2.0.png|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A lot of people freak out when they see problems involving atomic particles and electrical forces, but the concept is the same no matter the scale. For this problem we are given masses, velocities, and momentum, but the equation p = mv allows us to easily handle these different values. Once again drawing a diagram helps to understand what is actually happening in the problem, making it easier to put the values in the correct places and solve.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Okay, let&#039;s get a little bit trickier here...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a 400 kg train traveling at 55 m/s that collides, elastically of course, with a random 2 kg trashcan that&#039;s stationary on the tracks. So afterwards, what are the speeds of both the train and the trashcan after the collision?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Problem3.0.png|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This was a difficult problem because of the assumptions we had to make in order to solve it. Because the collision was elastic we were able to disregard the change in internal energy in the energy principle, and since it happened so quickly the work done by the track and heat transfer between the surroundings was negligible. It is tough to tell what assumptions you can make and which ones you can&#039;t in problems like these, which is what can make them difficult. On most exams or quizzes the collision problems will be inelastic simply because they are harder, but it is important to understand the fundementals of elastic collisions and how to solve problems involving them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So how are collisions connected to the real world? Collisions are all around us! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One main example is cars! Lots of car companies will purposely test and wreck cars to test collisions! Data is then sent to places like the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety where we can learn about car agility and more. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:crash-test.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another example of collisions in real life is billiards. This is one of the most accurate real life examples of elastic collisions. One ball hits another ball at rest, and if done right the first ball stops and transfers nearly all its kinetic energy into kinetic energy in the second ball. We consider this a head on collision of equal masses. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Pool1.0.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A final example is hitting a baseball. Hitting a ball off the end or to close the hands of a bat will cause some vibrational energy from the collision, but if the ball catches the sweet spot the collision is very elastic, and you don&#039;t feel any vibration when you strike the ball.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Hittingabaseball.jpg|500px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Collisions are certainly not a knew concept in the world. Ever since the beginning or time things have been colliding and reacting in different ways. It was experiments done by scientists like Newton or Rutherford that started to characterize collisions into categories and apply fundamental principles of physics to the reactions. What we observed above was the Newtonian way.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The history of collisions originates from the Rutherford Scattering experiment. It consisted of shooting alpha particles through a thin gold foil. As Rutherford studied the scattering of alpha particles through metal foils, he first noticed a collision with a single massive positive particle. Although the alpha particles did not hit the nucleus of the gold atoms, they did interact with each other and therefore can be considered as a collision. Since the interaction did not excite the gold atoms, fortunately enough, it was an elastic collision. This lead to the conclusion that the positive charge of the mass was concentrated in the center, the atomic nucleus! The plum pudding model (where the positive and negative charges were stuck within the atom like plums in a pudding), that had been around was disproved. When further research was done, they measured the angle of the &#039;scattering&#039; or the particles shot through a tin gold foil. Had the collisions been inelastic, the particles would not have been able to bounce back. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:gold-foil-experiment.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5pZj0u_XMbc] is a youtube clip detailing the experiment:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://physicsbook.gatech.edu/Collisions for a general understanding of all collisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://physicsbook.gatech.edu/inelastic_collisions to contrast them from elastic collisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.britannica.com/science/elastic-collision&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.physicsclassroom.com/mmedia/momentum/trece.cfm]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/elacol2.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.boundless.com/physics/textbooks/boundless-physics-textbook/linear-momentum-and-collisions-7/collisions-70/elastic-collisions-in-one-dimension-298-6220/]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Main Idea:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Matter and Interactions, 4th Edition&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.sparknotes.com/testprep/books/sat2/physics/chapter9section4.rhtml&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://blogs.bu.edu/ggarber/archive/bua-physics/collisions-and-conservation-of-momentum/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
History:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Matter and Interactions, 4th Edition&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elastic_collision&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5pZj0u_XMbc&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Connectedness:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.iihs.org/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally used references from &#039;&#039;see also&#039;&#039;.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Samigues3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Elastic_Collisions&amp;diff=28057</id>
		<title>Elastic Collisions</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Elastic_Collisions&amp;diff=28057"/>
		<updated>2017-04-09T18:47:34Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Samigues3: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;CLAIMED BY SEAN FISCHER AND EDITED BY SOLANGE AMIGUES&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So what exactly is an elastic collision?  I know you’re thinking, “Oh I know all about elasticity,” but LOL this is not bubble gum or rubber bands guys!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An elastic collision is a collision between two or more objects in which there is no loss in kinetic energy before and after the collision. If we assume that the colliding objects are part of the system and that there is no force from the surroundings, the final kinetic energy is still in the same form as it was initially. This is because the surrounding forces are considered to have a negligible impact compared to the forces that occur between the colliding objects. To keep it simple, this means that kinetic energy in= kinetic energy out. Usually, you can determine if a collision is elastic or not by seeing if the objects bounce off one another and/or to not get stuck together after collision (the latter would be an inelastic collision). Remember how your parents always told you what goes in must come out? They were talking about elastic collisions... probably. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, elastic collisions are a wonderful representation of the conservation of momentum which states that the momentum of an isolated system is constant. For an isolated system undergoing an elastic collision momentum in = momentum out. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And I love playing pool because every time a ball hits another and they bounce off one another I’m witnessing an elastic collision so basically I’m a physicist in the lab. The image below demonstrates the main idea of an elastic collision. Boing!! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It&#039;s important to note that with macroscopic systems there are no perfectly elastic collisions because there&#039;s always at least a dab of dissipation (like some thermal energy given off), but most are nearly elastic. The only time there are perfect collisions is on a microscopic level when atomic systems with quantized energy collide, but that&#039;s only if there is enough energy available to raise the systems to an excited quantum state-- but quantum energy is really a whole other topic. Let&#039;s focus on elastic collisions!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
                                                     [[File: boing.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
                         [[File:Elastischer_stoß2.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Check out this funny video on elastic collisions also! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9EqU1_DXUw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now check out this more informative video on elastic collisions: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4vzNk4qppw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now lets take what we know about elastic collisions and talk about it in mathematical terms. There are three main mathematical concepts surrounding elastic collisions:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: CodeCogsEqn.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_9.36.09_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Or you can simply use the middle equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: CodeCogsEqn copy.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_9.11.11_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: CodeCogsEqn_copy_2.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Example Problem&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cart 1, moving in the positive x direction, collides with cart 2 moving in the negative x direction. Both carts have identical masses and the collisions is (nearly) elastic, as it would be if the carts interacted magnetically or repelled each other through soft springs. What are the final momenta of the two carts?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Example1good.jpg|350px|thumb|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. After choosing a correct system, surroundings, and initial and final states, we can apply the momentum principle mentioned above to get a relationship&lt;br /&gt;
between the initial and final momentums of the two carts.  Usually, when we want to consider the system, we will consider the two colliding objects as the system and the rest as the surroundings. The initial state would be before the collision, and the final state would be after.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Momentum Principle:[[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_9.56.06_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And it turns into: [[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_10.03.50_AM.png]] since during the collision, the Fnet is negligible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Next, by applying the energy principle we can gain knowledge about the final and initial kinetic energies. By acknowledging the fact that the change in internal energy is 0 and the fact the reaction happens so quickly that not work or heat transfer is done by the surroundings, the equation can be simplified to include just initial and final kinetic energies. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Energy Principle: [[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_10.51.29_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We then get rid of the work, heat transfer and internal energies: [[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_11.04.06_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The reason the internal energies are directly crossed out is because we can put them to one side and since Efinal=Einitial, Efinal-Einitial=0.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Once we have simplified the momentum and energy principles, one can use the relationship between kinetic energy and momentum mentioned above to get a relationship involving both energy and momentum. Once this is obtained, the equation can be shifted around to get both the final momentums.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kinetic Energy Definition: [[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_11.10.01_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finished Result: [[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_11.12.35_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The link below demonstrates a basic car crash elastic collision using MATLAB. Take note of the changes in displacement and the time. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AfCfCS6O2VM Elastic Collision MATLAB model]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Be sure to show all steps in your solution and include diagrams whenever possible. For a lot of the complicated problems, starting with a diagram and writing down the given information and plugging that into either the momentum or energy principle can help you move forward in the problem. It would be better to also write the main principles at the side to remind yourself of how you found it.  If you still get stuck, try finding similar examples to that problem and look at the solutions to get on the right track.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let’s start with a simple example like the ones you don&#039;t see on the test. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jay and Sarah are best friends. Since they’re best friends they both weigh 55 kg. Jay hadn’t seen Sarah in a long time so when she saw her she ran to her with a velocity of &amp;lt;4,0,0&amp;gt; m/s. Instead of a hug, they were both too excited and collided and bounced back off of each other, and Sarah flew back with a velocity of &amp;lt;7,0,0&amp;gt; m/s. What was Jay’s final velocity?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Problem1.0.png|300px|Problem 1]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a lot of simple elastic collision problems, the momentum principle is all you need to solve them. Most problems will the initial velocities, masses, and one final velocity and you will be asked to solve for a either a final velocity or final momentum. By setting up an equation like the one in this problem, one can easily handle this type of problem.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When far apart, the momentum of a proton is &amp;lt;5.2 ✕ 10−21, 0, 0&amp;gt; kg · m/s as it approaches another proton that is initially at rest. The two protons repel each other electrically, but they are not close enough to touch. When they are far apart again later, one of the protons now has a velocity of &amp;lt;1.75, .82, 0&amp;gt; m/s. At that instant, what is the momentum of the other proton? HINT: Mass of proton is 1.7 *10^-21 kg.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Problem2.0.png|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A lot of people freak out when they see problems involving atomic particles and electrical forces, but the concept is the same no matter the scale. For this problem we are given masses, velocities, and momentum, but the equation p = mv allows us to easily handle these different values. Once again drawing a diagram helps to understand what is actually happening in the problem, making it easier to put the values in the correct places and solve.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Okay, let&#039;s get a little bit trickier here...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a 400 kg train traveling at 55 m/s that collides, elastically of course, with a random 2 kg trashcan that&#039;s stationary on the tracks. So afterwards, what are the speeds of both the train and the trashcan after the collision?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Problem3.0.png|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This was a difficult problem because of the assumptions we had to make in order to solve it. Because the collision was elastic we were able to disregard the change in internal energy in the energy principle, and since it happened so quickly the work done by the track and heat transfer between the surroundings was negligible. It is tough to tell what assumptions you can make and which ones you can&#039;t in problems like these, which is what can make them difficult. On most exams or quizzes the collision problems will be inelastic simply because they are harder, but it is important to understand the fundementals of elastic collisions and how to solve problems involving them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So how are collisions connected to the real world? Collisions are all around us! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One main example is cars! Lots of car companies will purposely test and wreck cars to test collisions! Data is then sent to places like the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety where we can learn about car agility and more. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:crash-test.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another example of collisions in real life is billiards. This is one of the most accurate real life examples of elastic collisions. One ball hits another ball at rest, and if done right the first ball stops and transfers nearly all its kinetic energy into kinetic energy in the second ball. We consider this a head on collision of equal masses. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Pool1.0.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A final example is hitting a baseball. Hitting a ball off the end or to close the hands of a bat will cause some vibrational energy from the collision, but if the ball catches the sweet spot the collision is very elastic, and you don&#039;t feel any vibration when you strike the ball.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Hittingabaseball.jpg|500px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Collisions are certainly not a knew concept in the world. Ever since the beginning or time things have been colliding and reacting in different ways. It was experiments done by scientists like Newton or Rutherford that started to characterize collisions into categories and apply fundamental principles of physics to the reactions. What we observed above was the Newtonian way.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The history of collisions originates from the Rutherford Scattering experiment. It consisted of shooting alpha particles through a thin gold foil. As Rutherford studied the scattering of alpha particles through metal foils, he first noticed a collision with a single massive positive particle. Although the alpha particles did not hit the nucleus of the gold atoms, they did interact with each other and therefore can be considered as a collision. Since the interaction did not excite the gold atoms, fortunately enough, it was an elastic collision. This lead to the conclusion that the positive charge of the mass was concentrated in the center, the atomic nucleus! The plum pudding model (where the positive and negative charges were stuck within the atom like plums in a pudding), that had been around was disproved. When further research was done, they measured the angle of the &#039;scattering&#039; or the particles shot through a tin gold foil. Had the collisions been inelastic, the particles would not have been able to bounce back. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:gold-foil-experiment.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5pZj0u_XMbc] is a youtube clip detailing the experiment:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://physicsbook.gatech.edu/Collisions for a general understanding of all collisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://physicsbook.gatech.edu/inelastic_collisions to contrast them from elastic collisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.britannica.com/science/elastic-collision&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.physicsclassroom.com/mmedia/momentum/trece.cfm]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/elacol2.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.boundless.com/physics/textbooks/boundless-physics-textbook/linear-momentum-and-collisions-7/collisions-70/elastic-collisions-in-one-dimension-298-6220/]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Main Idea:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Matter and Interactions, 4th Edition&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.sparknotes.com/testprep/books/sat2/physics/chapter9section4.rhtml&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://blogs.bu.edu/ggarber/archive/bua-physics/collisions-and-conservation-of-momentum/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
History:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Matter and Interactions, 4th Edition&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elastic_collision&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5pZj0u_XMbc&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Connectedness:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.iihs.org/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally used references from &#039;&#039;see also&#039;&#039;.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Samigues3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Elastic_Collisions&amp;diff=28050</id>
		<title>Elastic Collisions</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Elastic_Collisions&amp;diff=28050"/>
		<updated>2017-04-09T18:42:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Samigues3: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;CLAIMED BY SEAN FISCHER AND EDITED BY SOLANGE AMIGUES&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So what exactly is an elastic collision?  I know you’re thinking, “Oh I know all about elasticity,” but LOL this is not bubble gum or rubber bands guys!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An elastic collision is a collision between two or more objects in which there is no loss in kinetic energy before and after the collision. If we assume that the colliding objects are part of the system and that there is no force from the surroundings, the final kinetic energy is still in the same form as it was initially. This is because the surrounding forces are considered to have a negligible impact compared to the forces that occur between the colliding objects. To keep it simple, this means that kinetic energy in= kinetic energy out. Usually, you can determine if a collision is elastic or not by seeing if the objects bounce off one another and/or to not get stuck together after collision (the latter would be an inelastic collision). Remember how your parents always told you what goes in must come out? They were talking about elastic collisions... probably. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, elastic collisions are a wonderful representation of the conservation of momentum which states that the momentum of an isolated system is constant. For an isolated system undergoing an elastic collision momentum in = momentum out. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And I love playing pool because every time a ball hits another and they bounce off one another I’m witnessing an elastic collision so basically I’m a physicist in the lab. The image below demonstrates the main idea of an elastic collision. Boing!! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It&#039;s important to note that with macroscopic systems there are no perfectly elastic collisions because there&#039;s always at least a dab of dissipation (like some thermal energy given off), but most are nearly elastic. The only time there are perfect collisions is on a microscopic level when atomic systems with quantized energy collide, but that&#039;s only if there is enough energy available to raise the systems to an excited quantum state-- but quantum energy is really a whole other topic. Let&#039;s focus on elastic collisions!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
                                                     [[File: boing.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
                         [[File:Elastischer_stoß2.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Check out this funny video on elastic collisions also! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9EqU1_DXUw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now check out this more informative video on elastic collisions: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4vzNk4qppw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now lets take what we know about elastic collisions and talk about it in mathematical terms. There are three main mathematical concepts surrounding elastic collisions:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: CodeCogsEqn.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_9.36.09_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Or you can simply use the middle equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: CodeCogsEqn copy.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_9.11.11_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: CodeCogsEqn_copy_2.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Example Problem&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cart 1, moving in the positive x direction, collides with cart 2 moving in the negative x direction. Both carts have identical masses and the collisions is (nearly) elastic, as it would be if the carts interacted magnetically or repelled each other through soft springs. What are the final momenta of the two carts?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Example1good.jpg|350px|thumb|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. After choosing a correct system, surroundings, and initial and final states, we can apply the momentum principle mentioned above to get a relationship&lt;br /&gt;
between the initial and final momentums of the two carts.  Usually, when we want to consider the system, we will consider the two colliding objects as the system and the rest as the surroundings. The initial state would be before the collision, and the final state would be after.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Momentum Principle:[[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_9.56.06_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And it turns into: [[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_10.03.50_AM.png]] since during the collision, the Fnet is negligible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Next, by applying the energy principle we can gain knowledge about the final and initial kinetic energies. By acknowledging the fact that the change in internal energy is 0 and the fact the reaction happens so quickly that not work or heat transfer is done by the surroundings, the equation can be simplified to include just initial and final kinetic energies. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Energy Principle: [[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_10.51.29_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We then get rid of the work, heat transfer and internal energies: [[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_11.04.06_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The reason the internal energies are directly crossed out is because we can put them to one side and since Efinal=Einitial, Efinal-Einitial=0.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Once we have simplified the momentum and energy principles, one can use the relationship between kinetic energy and momentum mentioned above to get a relationship involving both energy and momentum. Once this is obtained, the equation can be shifted around to get both the final momentums.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kinetic Energy Definition: [[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_11.10.01_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finished Result: [[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_11.12.35_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The link below demonstrates a basic car crash elastic collision using MATLAB. Take note of the changes in displacement and the time. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AfCfCS6O2VM Elastic Collision MATLAB model]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Be sure to show all steps in your solution and include diagrams whenever possible. For a lot of the complicated problems, starting with a diagram and writing down the given information and plugging that into either the momentum or energy principle can help you move forward in the problem. It would be better to also write the main principles at the side to remind yourself of how you found it.  If you still get stuck, try finding similar examples to that problem and look at the solutions to get on the right track.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let’s start with a simple example like the ones you don&#039;t see on the test. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jay and Sarah are best friends. Since they’re best friends they both weigh 55 kg. Jay hadn’t seen Sarah in a long time so when she saw her she ran to her with a velocity of &amp;lt;4,0,0&amp;gt; m/s. Instead of a hug, they were both too excited and collided and bounced back off of each other, and Sarah flew back with a velocity of &amp;lt;7,0,0&amp;gt; m/s. What was Jay’s final velocity?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Problem1.0.png|300px|Problem 1]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a lot of simple elastic collision problems, the momentum principle is all you need to solve them. Most problems will the initial velocities, masses, and one final velocity and you will be asked to solve for a either a final velocity or final momentum. By setting up an equation like the one in this problem, one can easily handle this type of problem.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When far apart, the momentum of a proton is &amp;lt;5.2 ✕ 10−21, 0, 0&amp;gt; kg · m/s as it approaches another proton that is initially at rest. The two protons repel each other electrically, but they are not close enough to touch. When they are far apart again later, one of the protons now has a velocity of &amp;lt;1.75, .82, 0&amp;gt; m/s. At that instant, what is the momentum of the other proton? HINT: Mass of proton is 1.7 *10^-21 kg.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Problem2.0.png|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A lot of people freak out when they see problems involving atomic particles and electrical forces, but the concept is the same no matter the scale. For this problem we are given masses, velocities, and momentum, but the equation p = mv allows us to easily handle these different values. Once again drawing a diagram helps to understand what is actually happening in the problem, making it easier to put the values in the correct places and solve.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Okay, let&#039;s get a little bit trickier here...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a 400 kg train traveling at 55 m/s that collides, elastically of course, with a random 2 kg trashcan that&#039;s stationary on the tracks. So afterwards, what are the speeds of both the train and the trashcan after the collision?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Problem3.0.png|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This was a difficult problem because of the assumptions we had to make in order to solve it. Because the collision was elastic we were able to disregard the change in internal energy in the energy principle, and since it happened so quickly the work done by the track and heat transfer between the surroundings was negligible. It is tough to tell what assumptions you can make and which ones you can&#039;t in problems like these, which is what can make them difficult. On most exams or quizzes the collision problems will be inelastic simply because they are harder, but it is important to understand the fundementals of elastic collisions and how to solve problems involving them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So how are collisions connected to the real world? Collisions are all around us! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One main example is cars! Lots of car companies will purposely test and wreck cars to test collisions! Data is then sent to places like the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety where we can learn about car agility and more. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:crash-test.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another example of collisions in real life is billiards. This is one of the most accurate real life examples of elastic collisions. One ball hits another ball at rest, and if done right the first ball stops and transfers nearly all its kinetic energy into kinetic energy in the second ball. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Pool1.0.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A final example is hitting a baseball. Hitting a ball off the end or to close the hands of a bat will cause some vibrational energy from the collision, but if the ball catches the sweet spot the collision is very elastic, and you don&#039;t feel any vibration when you strike the ball.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Hittingabaseball.jpg|500px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Collisions are certainly not a knew concept in the world. Ever since the beginning or time things have been colliding and reacting in different ways. It was experiments done by scientists like Newton or Rutherford that started to characterize collisions into categories and apply fundamental principles of physics to the reactions. What we observed above was the Newtonian way.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The history of collisions originates from the Rutherford Scattering experiment. It consisted of shooting alpha particles through a thin gold foil. As Rutherford studied the scattering of alpha particles through metal foils, he first noticed a collision with a single massive positive particle. Although the alpha particles did not hit the nucleus of the gold atoms, they did interact with each other and therefore can be considered as a collision. Since the interaction did not excite the gold atoms, fortunately enough, it was an elastic collision. This lead to the conclusion that the positive charge of the mass was concentrated in the center, the atomic nucleus! The plum pudding model (where the positive and negative charges were stuck within the atom like plums in a pudding), that had been around was disproved. When further research was done, they measured the angle of the &#039;scattering&#039; or the particles shot through a tin gold foil. Had the collisions been inelastic, the particles would not have been able to bounce back. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:gold-foil-experiment.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5pZj0u_XMbc] is a youtube clip detailing the experiment:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://physicsbook.gatech.edu/Collisions for a general understanding of all collisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://physicsbook.gatech.edu/inelastic_collisions to contrast them from elastic collisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.britannica.com/science/elastic-collision&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.physicsclassroom.com/mmedia/momentum/trece.cfm]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/elacol2.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.boundless.com/physics/textbooks/boundless-physics-textbook/linear-momentum-and-collisions-7/collisions-70/elastic-collisions-in-one-dimension-298-6220/]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Main Idea:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Matter and Interactions, 4th Edition&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.sparknotes.com/testprep/books/sat2/physics/chapter9section4.rhtml&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://blogs.bu.edu/ggarber/archive/bua-physics/collisions-and-conservation-of-momentum/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
History:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Matter and Interactions, 4th Edition&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elastic_collision&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5pZj0u_XMbc&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Connectedness:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.iihs.org/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally used references from &#039;&#039;see also&#039;&#039;.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Samigues3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Elastic_Collisions&amp;diff=28045</id>
		<title>Elastic Collisions</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Elastic_Collisions&amp;diff=28045"/>
		<updated>2017-04-09T18:38:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Samigues3: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;CLAIMED BY SEAN FISCHER AND EDITED BY SOLANGE AMIGUES&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So what exactly is an elastic collision?  I know you’re thinking, “Oh I know all about elasticity,” but LOL this is not bubble gum or rubber bands guys!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An elastic collision is a collision between two or more objects in which there is no loss in kinetic energy before and after the collision. If we assume that the colliding objects are part of the system and that there is no force from the surroundings, the final kinetic energy is still in the same form as it was initially. This is because the surrounding forces are considered to have a negligible impact compared to the forces that occur between the colliding objects. To keep it simple, this means that kinetic energy in= kinetic energy out. Usually, you can determine if a collision is elastic or not by seeing if the objects bounce off one another and/or to not get stuck together after collision (the latter would be an inelastic collision). Remember how your parents always told you what goes in must come out? They were talking about elastic collisions... probably. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, elastic collisions are a wonderful representation of the conservation of momentum which states that the momentum of an isolated system is constant. For an isolated system undergoing an elastic collision momentum in = momentum out. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And I love playing pool because every time a ball hits another and they bounce off one another I’m witnessing an elastic collision so basically I’m a physicist in the lab. The image below demonstrates the main idea of an elastic collision. Boing!! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It&#039;s important to note that with macroscopic systems there are no perfectly elastic collisions because there&#039;s always at least a dab of dissipation (like some thermal energy given off), but most are nearly elastic. The only time there are perfect collisions is on a microscopic level when atomic systems with quantized energy collide, but that&#039;s only if there is enough energy available to raise the systems to an excited quantum state-- but quantum energy is really a whole other topic. Let&#039;s focus on elastic collisions!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
                                                     [[File: boing.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
                         [[File:Elastischer_stoß2.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Check out this funny video on elastic collisions also! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9EqU1_DXUw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now check out this more informative video on elastic collisions: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4vzNk4qppw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now lets take what we know about elastic collisions and talk about it in mathematical terms. There are three main mathematical concepts surrounding elastic collisions:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: CodeCogsEqn.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_9.36.09_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Or you can simply use the middle equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: CodeCogsEqn copy.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_9.11.11_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: CodeCogsEqn_copy_2.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Example Problem&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cart 1, moving in the positive x direction, collides with cart 2 moving in the negative x direction. Both carts have identical masses and the collisions is (nearly) elastic, as it would be if the carts interacted magnetically or repelled each other through soft springs. What are the final momenta of the two carts?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Example1good.jpg|350px|thumb|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. After choosing a correct system, surroundings, and initial and final states, we can apply the momentum principle mentioned above to get a relationship&lt;br /&gt;
between the initial and final momentums of the two carts.  Usually, when we want to consider the system, we will consider the two colliding objects as the system and the rest as the surroundings. The initial state would be before the collision, and the final state would be after.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Momentum Principle:[[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_9.56.06_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And it turns into: [[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_10.03.50_AM.png]] since during the collision, the Fnet is negligible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Next, by applying the energy principle we can gain knowledge about the final and initial kinetic energies. By acknowledging the fact that the change in internal energy is 0 and the fact the reaction happens so quickly that not work or heat transfer is done by the surroundings, the equation can be simplified to include just initial and final kinetic energies. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Energy Principle: [[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_10.51.29_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We then get rid of the work, heat transfer and internal energies: [[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_11.04.06_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The reason the internal energies are directly crossed out is because we can put them to one side and since Efinal=Einitial, Efinal-Einitial=0.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Once we have simplified the momentum and energy principles, one can use the relationship between kinetic energy and momentum mentioned above to get a relationship involving both energy and momentum. Once this is obtained, the equation can be shifted around to get both the final momentums.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kinetic Energy Definition: [[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_11.10.01_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finished Result: [[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_11.12.35_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The link below demonstrates a basic car crash elastic collision using MATLAB. Take note of the changes in displacement and the time. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AfCfCS6O2VM Elastic Collision MATLAB model]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Be sure to show all steps in your solution and include diagrams whenever possible. For a lot of the complicated problems, starting with a diagram and writing down the given information and plugging that into either the momentum or energy principle can help you move forward in the problem. If you still get stuck, try finding similar examples to that problem and look at the solutions to get on the right track.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let’s start with a simple example like the ones you don&#039;t see on the test. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jay and Sarah are best friends. Since they’re best friends they both weigh 55 kg. Jay hadn’t seen Sarah in a long time so when she saw her she ran to her with a velocity of &amp;lt;4,0,0&amp;gt; m/s. Instead of a hug, they were both too excited and collided and bounced back off of each other, and Sarah flew back with a velocity of &amp;lt;7,0,0&amp;gt; m/s. What was Jay’s final velocity?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Problem1.0.png|300px|Problem 1]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a lot of simple elastic collision problems, the momentum principle is all you need to solve them. Most problems will the initial velocities, masses, and one final velocity and you will be asked to solve for a either a final velocity or final momentum. By setting up an equation like the one in this problem, one can easily handle this type of problem.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When far apart, the momentum of a proton is &amp;lt;5.2 ✕ 10−21, 0, 0&amp;gt; kg · m/s as it approaches another proton that is initially at rest. The two protons repel each other electrically, but they are not close enough to touch. When they are far apart again later, one of the protons now has a velocity of &amp;lt;1.75, .82, 0&amp;gt; m/s. At that instant, what is the momentum of the other proton? HINT: Mass of proton is 1.7 *10^-21 kg.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Problem2.0.png|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A lot of people freak out when they see problems involving atomic particles and electrical forces, but the concept is the same no matter the scale. For this problem we are given masses, velocities, and momentum, but the equation p = mv allows us to easily handle these different values. Once again drawing a diagram helps to understand what is actually happening in the problem, making it easier to put the values in the correct places and solve.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Okay, let&#039;s get a little bit trickier here...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a 400 kg train traveling at 55 m/s that collides, elastically of course, with a random 2 kg trashcan that&#039;s stationary on the tracks. So afterwards, what are the speeds of both the train and the trashcan after the collision?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Problem3.0.png|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This was a difficult problem because of the assumptions we had to make in order to solve it. Because the collision was elastic we were able to disregard the change in internal energy in the energy principle, and since it happened so quickly the work done by the track and heat transfer between the surroundings was negligible. It is tough to tell what assumptions you can make and which ones you can&#039;t in problems like these, which is what can make them difficult. On most exams or quizzes the collision problems will be inelastic simply because they are harder, but it is important to understand the fundementals of elastic collisions and how to solve problems involving them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So how are collisions connected to the real world? Collisions are all around us! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One main example is cars! Lots of car companies will purposely test and wreck cars to test collisions! Data is then sent to places like the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety where we can learn about car agility and more. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:crash-test.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another example of collisions in real life is billiards. This is one of the most accurate real life examples of elastic collisions. One ball hits another ball at rest, and if done right the first ball stops and transfers nearly all its kinetic energy into kinetic energy in the second ball. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Pool1.0.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A final example is hitting a baseball. Hitting a ball off the end or to close the hands of a bat will cause some vibrational energy from the collision, but if the ball catches the sweet spot the collision is very elastic, and you don&#039;t feel any vibration when you strike the ball.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Hittingabaseball.jpg|500px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Collisions are certainly not a knew concept in the world. Ever since the beginning or time things have been colliding and reacting in different ways. It was experiments done by scientists like Newton or Rutherford that started to characterize collisions into categories and apply fundamental principles of physics to the reactions. What we observed above was the Newtonian way.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The history of collisions originates from the Rutherford Scattering experiment. It consisted of shooting alpha particles through a thin gold foil. As Rutherford studied the scattering of alpha particles through metal foils, he first noticed a collision with a single massive positive particle. Although the alpha particles did not hit the nucleus of the gold atoms, they did interact with each other and therefore can be considered as a collision. Since the interaction did not excite the gold atoms, fortunately enough, it was an elastic collision. This lead to the conclusion that the positive charge of the mass was concentrated in the center, the atomic nucleus! The plum pudding model (where the positive and negative charges were stuck within the atom like plums in a pudding), that had been around was disproved. When further research was done, they measured the angle of the &#039;scattering&#039; or the particles shot through a tin gold foil. Had the collisions been inelastic, the particles would not have been able to bounce back. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:gold-foil-experiment.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5pZj0u_XMbc] is a youtube clip detailing the experiment:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://physicsbook.gatech.edu/Collisions for a general understanding of all collisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://physicsbook.gatech.edu/inelastic_collisions to contrast them from elastic collisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.britannica.com/science/elastic-collision&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.physicsclassroom.com/mmedia/momentum/trece.cfm]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/elacol2.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.boundless.com/physics/textbooks/boundless-physics-textbook/linear-momentum-and-collisions-7/collisions-70/elastic-collisions-in-one-dimension-298-6220/]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Main Idea:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Matter and Interactions, 4th Edition&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.sparknotes.com/testprep/books/sat2/physics/chapter9section4.rhtml&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://blogs.bu.edu/ggarber/archive/bua-physics/collisions-and-conservation-of-momentum/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
History:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Matter and Interactions, 4th Edition&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elastic_collision&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5pZj0u_XMbc&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Connectedness:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.iihs.org/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally used references from &#039;&#039;see also&#039;&#039;.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Samigues3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Elastic_Collisions&amp;diff=28043</id>
		<title>Elastic Collisions</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Elastic_Collisions&amp;diff=28043"/>
		<updated>2017-04-09T18:36:35Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Samigues3: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;CLAIMED BY SEAN FISCHER AND EDITED BY SOLANGE AMIGUES&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So what exactly is an elastic collision?  I know you’re thinking, “Oh I know all about elasticity,” but LOL this is not bubble gum or rubber bands guys!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An elastic collision is a collision between two or more objects in which there is no loss in kinetic energy before and after the collision. If we assume that the colliding objects are part of the system and that there is no force from the surroundings, the final kinetic energy is still in the same form as it was initially. This is because the surrounding forces are considered to have a negligible impact compared to the forces that occur between the colliding objects. To keep it simple, this means that kinetic energy in= kinetic energy out. Usually, you can determine if a collision is elastic or not by seeing if the objects bounce off one another and/or to not get stuck together after collision (the latter would be an inelastic collision). Remember how your parents always told you what goes in must come out? They were talking about elastic collisions... probably. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, elastic collisions are a wonderful representation of the conservation of momentum which states that the momentum of an isolated system is constant. For an isolated system undergoing an elastic collision momentum in = momentum out. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And I love playing pool because every time a ball hits another and they bounce off one another I’m witnessing an elastic collision so basically I’m a physicist in the lab. The image below demonstrates the main idea of an elastic collision. Boing!! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It&#039;s important to note that with macroscopic systems there are no perfectly elastic collisions because there&#039;s always at least a dab of dissipation (like some thermal energy given off), but most are nearly elastic. The only time there are perfect collisions is on a microscopic level when atomic systems with quantized energy collide, but that&#039;s only if there is enough energy available to raise the systems to an excited quantum state-- but quantum energy is really a whole other topic. Let&#039;s focus on elastic collisions!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
                                                     [[File: boing.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
                         [[File:Elastischer_stoß2.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Check out this funny video on elastic collisions also! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9EqU1_DXUw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now check out this more informative video on elastic collisions: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4vzNk4qppw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now lets take what we know about elastic collisions and talk about it in mathematical terms. There are three main mathematical concepts surrounding elastic collisions:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: CodeCogsEqn.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_9.36.09_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Or you can simply use the middle equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: CodeCogsEqn copy.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_9.11.11_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: CodeCogsEqn_copy_2.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Example Problem&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cart 1, moving in the positive x direction, collides with cart 2 moving in the negative x direction. Both carts have identical masses and the collisions is (nearly) elastic, as it would be if the carts interacted magnetically or repelled each other through soft springs. What are the final momenta of the two carts?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Example1good.jpg|350px|thumb|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. After choosing a correct system, surroundings, and initial and final states, we can apply the momentum principle mentioned above to get a relationship&lt;br /&gt;
between the initial and final momentums of the two carts.  Usually, when we want to consider the system, we will consider the two colliding objects as the system and the rest as the surroundings. The initial state would be before the collision, and the final state would be after.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Momentum Principle:[[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_9.56.06_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And it turns into: [[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_10.03.50_AM.png]] since during the collision, the Fnet is negligible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Next, by applying the energy principle we can gain knowledge about the final and initial kinetic energies. By acknowledging the fact that the change in internal energy is 0 and the fact the reaction happens so quickly that not work or heat transfer is done by the surroundings, the equation can be simplified to include just initial and final kinetic energies. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Energy Principle: [[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_10.51.29_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We then get rid of the work, heat transfer and internal energies: [[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_11.04.06_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The reason the internal energies are directly crossed out is because we can put them to one side and since Efinal=Einitial, Efinal-Einitial=0.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Once we have simplified the momentum and energy principles, one can use the relationship between kinetic energy and momentum mentioned above to get a relationship involving both energy and momentum. Once this is obtained, the equation can be shifted around to get both the final momentums.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kinetic Energy Definition: [[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_11.10.01_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finished Result: [[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_11.12.35_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The link below demonstrates a basic car crash elastic collision using MATLAB. Take note of the changes in displacement and the time. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AfCfCS6O2VM Elastic Collision MATLAB model]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Be sure to show all steps in your solution and include diagrams whenever possible. For a lot of the complicated problems, starting with a diagram and writing down the given information and plugging that into either the momentum or energy principle can help you move forward in the problem. If you still get stuck, try finding similar examples to that problem and look at the solutions to get on the right track.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let’s start with a simple example like the ones you don&#039;t see on the test. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jay and Sarah are best friends. Since they’re best friends they both weigh 55 kg. Jay hadn’t seen Sarah in a long time so when she saw her she ran to her with a velocity of &amp;lt;4,0,0&amp;gt; m/s. Instead of a hug, they were both too excited and collided and bounced back off of each other, and Sarah flew back with a velocity of &amp;lt;7,0,0&amp;gt; m/s. What was Jay’s final velocity?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Problem1.0.png|300px|Problem 1]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a lot of simple elastic collision problems, the momentum principle is all you need to solve them. Most problems will the initial velocities, masses, and one final velocity and you will be asked to solve for a either a final velocity or final momentum. By setting up an equation like the one in this problem, one can easily handle this type of problem.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When far apart, the momentum of a proton is &amp;lt;5.2 ✕ 10−21, 0, 0&amp;gt; kg · m/s as it approaches another proton that is initially at rest. The two protons repel each other electrically, but they are not close enough to touch. When they are far apart again later, one of the protons now has a velocity of &amp;lt;1.75, .82, 0&amp;gt; m/s. At that instant, what is the momentum of the other proton? HINT: Mass of proton is 1.7 *10^-21 kg.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Problem2.0.png|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A lot of people freak out when they see problems involving atomic particles and electrical forces, but the concept is the same no matter the scale. For this problem we are given masses, velocities, and momentum, but the equation p = mv allows us to easily handle these different values. Once again drawing a diagram helps to understand what is actually happening in the problem, making it easier to put the values in the correct places and solve.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Okay, let&#039;s get a little bit trickier here...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a 400 kg train traveling at 55 m/s that collides, elastically of course, with a random 2 kg trashcan that&#039;s stationary on the tracks. So afterwards, what are the speeds of both the train and the trashcan after the collision?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Problem3.0.png|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This was a difficult problem because of the assumptions we had to make in order to solve it. Because the collision was elastic we were able to disregard the change in internal energy in the energy principle, and since it happened so quickly the work done by the track and heat transfer between the surroundings was negligible. It is tough to tell what assumptions you can make and which ones you can&#039;t in problems like these, which is what can make them difficult. On most exams or quizzes the collision problems will be inelastic simply because they are harder, but it is important to understand the fundementals of elastic collisions and how to solve problems involving them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So how are collisions connected to the real world? Collisions are all around us! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One main example is cars! Lots of car companies will purposely test and wreck cars to test collisions! Data is then sent to places like the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety where we can learn about car agility and more. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:crash-test.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another example of collisions in real life is billiards. This is one of the most accurate real life examples of elastic collisions. One ball hits another ball at rest, and if done right the first ball stops and transfers nearly all its kinetic energy into kinetic energy in the second ball. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Pool1.0.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A final example is hitting a baseball. Hitting a ball off the end or to close the hands of a bat will cause some vibrational energy from the collision, but if the ball catches the sweet spot the collision is very elastic, and you don&#039;t feel any vibration when you strike the ball.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Hittingabaseball.jpg|500px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Collisions are certainly not a knew concept in the world. Ever since the beginning or time things have been colliding and reacting in different ways. It was experiments done by scientists like Newton or Rutherford that started to characterize collisions into categories and apply fundamental principles of physics to the reactions. What we observed above was the Newtonian way.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The history of collisions originates from the Rutherford Scattering experiment. It consisted of shooting alpha particles through a thin gold foil. As Rutherford studied the scattering of alpha particles through metal foils, he first noticed a collision with a single massive positive particle. Although the alpha particles did not hit the nucleus of the gold atoms, they did interact with each other and therefore can be considered as a collision. Since the interaction did not excite the gold atoms, fortunately enough, it was an elastic collision. This lead to the conclusion that the positive charge of the mass was concentrated in the center, the atomic nucleus! The plum pudding model (where the positive and negative charges were stuck within the atom like plums in a pudding), that had been around was disproved. When further research was done, they measured the angle of the &#039;scattering&#039; or the particles shot through a tin gold foil. Had the collisions been inelastic, the particles would not have been able to bounce back. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:gold-foil-experiment.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here is a youtube clip detailing the experiment:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5pZj0u_XMbc]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://physicsbook.gatech.edu/Collisions for a general understanding of all collisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://physicsbook.gatech.edu/inelastic_collisions to contrast them from elastic collisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.britannica.com/science/elastic-collision&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.physicsclassroom.com/mmedia/momentum/trece.cfm]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/elacol2.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.boundless.com/physics/textbooks/boundless-physics-textbook/linear-momentum-and-collisions-7/collisions-70/elastic-collisions-in-one-dimension-298-6220/]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Main Idea:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Matter and Interactions, 4th Edition&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.sparknotes.com/testprep/books/sat2/physics/chapter9section4.rhtml&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://blogs.bu.edu/ggarber/archive/bua-physics/collisions-and-conservation-of-momentum/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
History:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elastic_collision&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Connectedness:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.iihs.org/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally used references from &#039;&#039;see also&#039;&#039;.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Samigues3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Elastic_Collisions&amp;diff=28041</id>
		<title>Elastic Collisions</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Elastic_Collisions&amp;diff=28041"/>
		<updated>2017-04-09T18:31:34Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Samigues3: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;CLAIMED BY SEAN FISCHER AND EDITED BY SOLANGE AMIGUES&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So what exactly is an elastic collision?  I know you’re thinking, “Oh I know all about elasticity,” but LOL this is not bubble gum or rubber bands guys!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An elastic collision is a collision between two or more objects in which there is no loss in kinetic energy before and after the collision. If we assume that the colliding objects are part of the system and that there is no force from the surroundings, the final kinetic energy is still in the same form as it was initially. This is because the surrounding forces are considered to have a negligible impact compared to the forces that occur between the colliding objects. To keep it simple, this means that kinetic energy in= kinetic energy out. Usually, you can determine if a collision is elastic or not by seeing if the objects bounce off one another and/or to not get stuck together after collision (the latter would be an inelastic collision). Remember how your parents always told you what goes in must come out? They were talking about elastic collisions... probably. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, elastic collisions are a wonderful representation of the conservation of momentum which states that the momentum of an isolated system is constant. For an isolated system undergoing an elastic collision momentum in = momentum out. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And I love playing pool because every time a ball hits another and they bounce off one another I’m witnessing an elastic collision so basically I’m a physicist in the lab. The image below demonstrates the main idea of an elastic collision. Boing!! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It&#039;s important to note that with macroscopic systems there are no perfectly elastic collisions because there&#039;s always at least a dab of dissipation (like some thermal energy given off), but most are nearly elastic. The only time there are perfect collisions is on a microscopic level when atomic systems with quantized energy collide, but that&#039;s only if there is enough energy available to raise the systems to an excited quantum state-- but quantum energy is really a whole other topic. Let&#039;s focus on elastic collisions!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
                                                     [[File: boing.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
                         [[File:Elastischer_stoß2.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Check out this funny video on elastic collisions also! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9EqU1_DXUw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now check out this more informative video on elastic collisions: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4vzNk4qppw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now lets take what we know about elastic collisions and talk about it in mathematical terms. There are three main mathematical concepts surrounding elastic collisions:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: CodeCogsEqn.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_9.36.09_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Or you can simply use the middle equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: CodeCogsEqn copy.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_9.11.11_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: CodeCogsEqn_copy_2.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Example Problem&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cart 1, moving in the positive x direction, collides with cart 2 moving in the negative x direction. Both carts have identical masses and the collisions is (nearly) elastic, as it would be if the carts interacted magnetically or repelled each other through soft springs. What are the final momenta of the two carts?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Example1good.jpg|350px|thumb|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. After choosing a correct system, surroundings, and initial and final states, we can apply the momentum principle mentioned above to get a relationship&lt;br /&gt;
between the initial and final momentums of the two carts.  Usually, when we want to consider the system, we will consider the two colliding objects as the system and the rest as the surroundings. The initial state would be before the collision, and the final state would be after.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Momentum Principle:[[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_9.56.06_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And it turns into: [[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_10.03.50_AM.png]] since during the collision, the Fnet is negligible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Next, by applying the energy principle we can gain knowledge about the final and initial kinetic energies. By acknowledging the fact that the change in internal energy is 0 and the fact the reaction happens so quickly that not work or heat transfer is done by the surroundings, the equation can be simplified to include just initial and final kinetic energies. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Energy Principle: [[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_10.51.29_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We then get rid of the work, heat transfer and internal energies: [[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_11.04.06_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The reason the internal energies are directly crossed out is because we can put them to one side and since Efinal=Einitial, Efinal-Einitial=0.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Once we have simplified the momentum and energy principles, one can use the relationship between kinetic energy and momentum mentioned above to get a relationship involving both energy and momentum. Once this is obtained, the equation can be shifted around to get both the final momentums.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kinetic Energy Definition: [[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_11.10.01_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finished Result: [[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_11.12.35_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The relationship: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The link below demonstrates a basic car crash elastic collision using MATLAB. Take note of the changes in displacement and the time. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AfCfCS6O2VM Elastic Collision MATLAB model]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Be sure to show all steps in your solution and include diagrams whenever possible. For a lot of the complicated problems, starting with a diagram and writing down the given information and plugging that into either the momentum or energy principle can help you move forward in the problem. If you still get stuck, try finding similar examples to that problem and look at the solutions to get on the right track.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let’s start with a simple example like the ones you don&#039;t see on the test. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jay and Sarah are best friends. Since they’re best friends they both weigh 55 kg. Jay hadn’t seen Sarah in a long time so when she saw her she ran to her with a velocity of &amp;lt;4,0,0&amp;gt; m/s. Instead of a hug, they were both too excited and collided and bounced back off of each other, and Sarah flew back with a velocity of &amp;lt;7,0,0&amp;gt; m/s. What was Jay’s final velocity?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Problem1.0.png|300px|Problem 1]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a lot of simple elastic collision problems, the momentum principle is all you need to solve them. Most problems will the initial velocities, masses, and one final velocity and you will be asked to solve for a either a final velocity or final momentum. By setting up an equation like the one in this problem, one can easily handle this type of problem.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When far apart, the momentum of a proton is &amp;lt;5.2 ✕ 10−21, 0, 0&amp;gt; kg · m/s as it approaches another proton that is initially at rest. The two protons repel each other electrically, but they are not close enough to touch. When they are far apart again later, one of the protons now has a velocity of &amp;lt;1.75, .82, 0&amp;gt; m/s. At that instant, what is the momentum of the other proton? HINT: Mass of proton is 1.7 *10^-21 kg.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Problem2.0.png|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A lot of people freak out when they see problems involving atomic particles and electrical forces, but the concept is the same no matter the scale. For this problem we are given masses, velocities, and momentum, but the equation p = mv allows us to easily handle these different values. Once again drawing a diagram helps to understand what is actually happening in the problem, making it easier to put the values in the correct places and solve.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Okay, let&#039;s get a little bit trickier here...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a 400 kg train traveling at 55 m/s that collides, elastically of course, with a random 2 kg trashcan that&#039;s stationary on the tracks. So afterwards, what are the speeds of both the train and the trashcan after the collision?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Problem3.0.png|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This was a difficult problem because of the assumptions we had to make in order to solve it. Because the collision was elastic we were able to disregard the change in internal energy in the energy principle, and since it happened so quickly the work done by the track and heat transfer between the surroundings was negligible. It is tough to tell what assumptions you can make and which ones you can&#039;t in problems like these, which is what can make them difficult. On most exams or quizzes the collision problems will be inelastic simply because they are harder, but it is important to understand the fundementals of elastic collisions and how to solve problems involving them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So how are collisions connected to the real world? Collisions are all around us! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One main example is cars! Lots of car companies will purposely test and wreck cars to test collisions! Data is then sent to places like the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety where we can learn about car agility and more. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:crash-test.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another example of collisions in real life is billiards. This is one of the most accurate real life examples of elastic collisions. One ball hits another ball at rest, and if done right the first ball stops and transfers nearly all its kinetic energy into kinetic energy in the second ball. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Pool1.0.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A final example is hitting a baseball. Hitting a ball off the end or to close the hands of a bat will cause some vibrational energy from the collision, but if the ball catches the sweet spot the collision is very elastic, and you don&#039;t feel any vibration when you strike the ball.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Hittingabaseball.jpg|500px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Collisions are certainly not a knew concept in the world. Ever since the beginning or time things have been colliding and reacting in different ways. It was experiments done by scientists like Newton or Rutherford that started to characterize collisions into categories and apply fundamental principles of physics to the reactions. What we observed above was the Newtonian way.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The history of collisions originates from the Rutherford Scattering experiment. It consisted of shooting alpha particles through a thin gold foil. As Rutherford studied the scattering of alpha particles through metal foils, he first noticed a collision with a single massive positive particle. Although the alpha particles did not hit the nucleus of the gold atoms, they did interact with each other and therefore can be considered as a collision. Since the interaction did not excite the gold atoms, fortunately enough, it was an elastic collision. This lead to the conclusion that the positive charge of the mass was concentrated in the center, the atomic nucleus! The plum pudding model (where the positive and negative charges were stuck within the atom like plums in a pudding), that had been around was disproved. When further research was done, they measured the angle of the &#039;scattering&#039; or the particles shot through a tin gold foil. Had the collisions been inelastic, the particles would not have been able to bounce back. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:gold-foil-experiment.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://physicsbook.gatech.edu/Collisions for a general understanding of all collisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://physicsbook.gatech.edu/inelastic_collisions to contrast them from elastic collisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.britannica.com/science/elastic-collision&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.physicsclassroom.com/mmedia/momentum/trece.cfm]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/elacol2.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.boundless.com/physics/textbooks/boundless-physics-textbook/linear-momentum-and-collisions-7/collisions-70/elastic-collisions-in-one-dimension-298-6220/]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Main Idea:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Matter and Interactions, 4th Edition&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.sparknotes.com/testprep/books/sat2/physics/chapter9section4.rhtml&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://blogs.bu.edu/ggarber/archive/bua-physics/collisions-and-conservation-of-momentum/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
History:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elastic_collision&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Connectedness:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.iihs.org/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally used references from &#039;&#039;see also&#039;&#039;.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Samigues3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Elastic_Collisions&amp;diff=27927</id>
		<title>Elastic Collisions</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Elastic_Collisions&amp;diff=27927"/>
		<updated>2017-04-09T15:14:13Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Samigues3: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;CLAIMED BY SEAN FISCHER AND EDITED BY SOLANGE AMIGUES&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So what exactly is an elastic collision?  I know you’re thinking, “Oh I know all about elasticity,” but LOL this is not bubble gum or rubber bands guys!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An elastic collision is a collision between two or more objects in which there is no loss in kinetic energy before and after the collision. If we assume that the colliding objects are part of the system and that there is no force from the surroundings, the final kinetic energy is still in the same form as it was initially. This is because the surrounding forces are considered to have a negligible impact compared to the forces that occur between the colliding objects. To keep it simple, this means that kinetic energy in= kinetic energy out. Usually, you can determine if a collision is elastic or not by seeing if the objects bounce off one another and/or to not get stuck together after collision (the latter would be an inelastic collision). Remember how your parents always told you what goes in must come out? They were talking about elastic collisions... probably. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, elastic collisions are a wonderful representation of the conservation of momentum which states that the momentum of an isolated system is constant. For an isolated system undergoing an elastic collision momentum in = momentum out. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And I love playing pool because every time a ball hits another and they bounce off one another I’m witnessing an elastic collision so basically I’m a physicist in the lab. The image below demonstrates the main idea of an elastic collision. Boing!! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It&#039;s important to note that with macroscopic systems there are no perfectly elastic collisions because there&#039;s always at least a dab of dissipation (like some thermal energy given off), but most are nearly elastic. The only time there are perfect collisions is on a microscopic level when atomic systems with quantized energy collide, but that&#039;s only if there is enough energy available to raise the systems to an excited quantum state-- but quantum energy is really a whole other topic. Let&#039;s focus on elastic collisions!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
                                                     [[File: boing.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
                         [[File:Elastischer_stoß2.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Check out this funny video on elastic collisions also! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9EqU1_DXUw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now check out this more informative video on elastic collisions: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4vzNk4qppw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now lets take what we know about elastic collisions and talk about it in mathematical terms. There are three main mathematical concepts surrounding elastic collisions:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: CodeCogsEqn.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_9.36.09_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Or you can simply use the middle equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: CodeCogsEqn copy.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_9.11.11_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: CodeCogsEqn_copy_2.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Example Problem&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cart 1, moving in the positive x direction, collides with cart 2 moving in the negative x direction. Both carts have identical masses and the collisions is (nearly) elastic, as it would be if the carts interacted magnetically or repelled each other through soft springs. What are the final momenta of the two carts?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Example1good.jpg|350px|thumb|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. After choosing a correct system, surroundings, and initial and final states, we can apply the momentum principle mentioned above to get a relationship&lt;br /&gt;
between the initial and final momentums of the two carts.  Usually, when we want to consider the system, we will consider the two colliding objects as the system and the rest as the surroundings. The initial state would be before the collision, and the final state would be after.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Momentum Principle:[[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_9.56.06_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And it turns into: [[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_10.03.50_AM.png]] since during the collision, the Fnet is negligible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Next, by applying the energy principle we can gain knowledge about the final and initial kinetic energies. By acknowledging the fact that the change in internal energy is 0 and the fact the reaction happens so quickly that not work or heat transfer is done by the surroundings, the equation can be simplified to include just initial and final kinetic energies. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Energy Principle: [[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_10.51.29_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We then get rid of the work, heat transfer and internal energies: [[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_11.04.06_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The reason the internal energies are directly crossed out is because we can put them to one side and since Efinal=Einitial, Efinal-Einitial=0.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Once we have simplified the momentum and energy principles, one can use the relationship between kinetic energy and momentum mentioned above to get a relationship involving both energy and momentum. Once this is obtained, the equation can be shifted around to get both the final momentums.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kinetic Energy Definition: [[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_11.10.01_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finished Result: [[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_11.12.35_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The relationship: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The link below demonstrates a basic car crash elastic collision using MATLAB. Take note of the changes in displacement and the time. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AfCfCS6O2VM Elastic Collision MATLAB model]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Be sure to show all steps in your solution and include diagrams whenever possible. For a lot of the complicated problems, starting with a diagram and writing down the given information and plugging that into either the momentum or energy principle can help you move forward in the problem. If you still get stuck, try finding similar examples to that problem and look at the solutions to get on the right track.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let’s start with a simple example like the ones you don&#039;t see on the test. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jay and Sarah are best friends. Since they’re best friends they both weigh 55 kg. Jay hadn’t seen Sarah in a long time so when she saw her she ran to her with a velocity of &amp;lt;4,0,0&amp;gt; m/s. Instead of a hug, they were both too excited and collided and bounced back off of each other, and Sarah flew back with a velocity of &amp;lt;7,0,0&amp;gt; m/s. What was Jay’s final velocity?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Problem1.0.png|300px|Problem 1]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a lot of simple elastic collision problems, the momentum principle is all you need to solve them. Most problems will the initial velocities, masses, and one final velocity and you will be asked to solve for a either a final velocity or final momentum. By setting up an equation like the one in this problem, one can easily handle this type of problem.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When far apart, the momentum of a proton is &amp;lt;5.2 ✕ 10−21, 0, 0&amp;gt; kg · m/s as it approaches another proton that is initially at rest. The two protons repel each other electrically, but they are not close enough to touch. When they are far apart again later, one of the protons now has a velocity of &amp;lt;1.75, .82, 0&amp;gt; m/s. At that instant, what is the momentum of the other proton? HINT: Mass of proton is 1.7 *10^-21 kg.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Problem2.0.png|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A lot of people freak out when they see problems involving atomic particles and electrical forces, but the concept is the same no matter the scale. For this problem we are given masses, velocities, and momentum, but the equation p = mv allows us to easily handle these different values. Once again drawing a diagram helps to understand what is actually happening in the problem, making it easier to put the values in the correct places and solve.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Okay, let&#039;s get a little bit trickier here...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a 400 kg train traveling at 55 m/s that collides, elastically of course, with a random 2 kg trashcan that&#039;s stationary on the tracks. So afterwards, what are the speeds of both the train and the trashcan after the collision?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Problem3.0.png|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This was a difficult problem because of the assumptions we had to make in order to solve it. Because the collision was elastic we were able to disregard the change in internal energy in the energy principle, and since it happened so quickly the work done by the track and heat transfer between the surroundings was negligible. It is tough to tell what assumptions you can make and which ones you can&#039;t in problems like these, which is what can make them difficult. On most exams or quizzes the collision problems will be inelastic simply because they are harder, but it is important to understand the fundementals of elastic collisions and how to solve problems involving them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So how are collisions connected to the real world? Collisions are all around us! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One main example is cars! Lots of car companies will purposely test and wreck cars to test collisions! Data is then sent to places like the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety where we can learn about car agility and more. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:crash-test.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another example of collisions in real life is billiards. This is one of the most accurate real life examples of elastic collisions. One ball hits another ball at rest, and if done right the first ball stops and transfers nearly all its kinetic energy into kinetic energy in the second ball. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Pool1.0.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A final example is hitting a baseball. Hitting a ball off the end or to close the hands of a bat will cause some vibrational energy from the collision, but if the ball catches the sweet spot the collision is very elastic, and you don&#039;t feel any vibration when you strike the ball.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Hittingabaseball.jpg|500px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Collisions are certainly not a knew concept in the world. Ever since the beginning or time things have been colliding and reacting in different ways. It was experiments done by scientists like Newton or Rutherford that started to characterize collisions into categories and apply fundamental principles of physics to the reactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The history of collisions originates from the Rutherford Scattering experiment. As Rutherford studied the scattering of alpha particles through metal foils, he first noticed a collision with a single massive positive particle. This lead to the conclusion that the positive charge of the mass was concentrated in the center, the atomic nucleus!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:gold-foil-experiment.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://physicsbook.gatech.edu/Collisions for a general understanding of all collisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://physicsbook.gatech.edu/inelastic_collisions to contrast them from elastic collisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.britannica.com/science/elastic-collision&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.physicsclassroom.com/mmedia/momentum/trece.cfm]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/elacol2.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.boundless.com/physics/textbooks/boundless-physics-textbook/linear-momentum-and-collisions-7/collisions-70/elastic-collisions-in-one-dimension-298-6220/]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Main Idea:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Matter and Interactions, 4th Edition&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.sparknotes.com/testprep/books/sat2/physics/chapter9section4.rhtml&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://blogs.bu.edu/ggarber/archive/bua-physics/collisions-and-conservation-of-momentum/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
History:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elastic_collision&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Connectedness:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.iihs.org/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally used references from &#039;&#039;see also&#039;&#039;.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Samigues3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Elastic_Collisions&amp;diff=27926</id>
		<title>Elastic Collisions</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Elastic_Collisions&amp;diff=27926"/>
		<updated>2017-04-09T15:13:08Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Samigues3: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;CLAIMED BY SEAN FISCHER AND EDITED BY SOLANGE AMIGUES&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So what exactly is an elastic collision?  I know you’re thinking, “Oh I know all about elasticity,” but LOL this is not bubble gum or rubber bands guys!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An elastic collision is a collision between two or more objects in which there is no loss in kinetic energy before and after the collision. If we assume that the colliding objects are part of the system and that there is no force from the surroundings, the final kinetic energy is still in the same form as it was initially. This is because the surrounding forces are considered to have a negligible impact compared to the forces that occur between the colliding objects. To keep it simple, this means that kinetic energy in= kinetic energy out. Usually, you can determine if a collision is elastic or not by seeing if the objects bounce off one another and/or to not get stuck together after collision (the latter would be an inelastic collision). Remember how your parents always told you what goes in must come out? They were talking about elastic collisions... probably. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, elastic collisions are a wonderful representation of the conservation of momentum which states that the momentum of an isolated system is constant. For an isolated system undergoing an elastic collision momentum in = momentum out. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And I love playing pool because every time a ball hits another and they bounce off one another I’m witnessing an elastic collision so basically I’m a physicist in the lab. The image below demonstrates the main idea of an elastic collision. Boing!! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It&#039;s important to note that with macroscopic systems there are no perfectly elastic collisions because there&#039;s always at least a dab of dissipation (like some thermal energy given off), but most are nearly elastic. The only time there are perfect collisions is on a microscopic level when atomic systems with quantized energy collide, but that&#039;s only if there is enough energy available to raise the systems to an excited quantum state-- but quantum energy is really a whole other topic. Let&#039;s focus on elastic collisions!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
                                                     [[File: boing.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
                         [[File:Elastischer_stoß2.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Check out this funny video on elastic collisions also! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9EqU1_DXUw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now check out this more informative video on elastic collisions: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4vzNk4qppw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now lets take what we know about elastic collisions and talk about it in mathematical terms. There are three main mathematical concepts surrounding elastic collisions:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: CodeCogsEqn.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_9.36.09_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Or you can simply use the middle equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: CodeCogsEqn copy.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_9.11.11_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: CodeCogsEqn_copy_2.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Example Problem&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cart 1, moving in the positive x direction, collides with cart 2 moving in the negative x direction. Both carts have identical masses and the collisions is (nearly) elastic, as it would be if the carts interacted magnetically or repelled each other through soft springs. What are the final momenta of the two carts?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Example1good.jpg|350px|thumb|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. After choosing a correct system, surroundings, and initial and final states, we can apply the momentum principle mentioned above to get a relationship&lt;br /&gt;
between the initial and final momentums of the two carts.  Usually, when we want to consider the system, we will consider the two colliding objects as the system and the rest as the surroundings. The initial state would be before the collision, and the final state would be after.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Momentum Principle:[[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_9.56.06_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And it turns into: [[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_10.03.50_AM.png]] since during the collision, the Fnet is negligible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Next, by applying the energy principle we can gain knowledge about the final and initial kinetic energies. By acknowledging the fact that the change in internal energy is 0 and the fact the reaction happens so quickly that not work or heat transfer is done by the surroundings, the equation can be simplified to include just initial and final kinetic energies. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Energy Principle: [[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_10.51.29_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We then get rid of the work, heat transfer and internal energies: [[Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_11.04.06_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The reason the internal energies are directly crossed out is because we can put them to one side and since Efinal=Einitial, Efinal-Einitial=0.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Once we have simplified the momentum and energy principles, one can use the relationship between kinetic energy and momentum mentioned above to get a relationship involving both energy and momentum. Once this is obtained, the equation can be shifted around to get both the final momentums.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kinetic Energy Definition: [[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_11.10.01_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finished Result: [[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_11.12.35_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The relationship: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The link below demonstrates a basic car crash elastic collision using MATLAB. Take note of the changes in displacement and the time. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AfCfCS6O2VM Elastic Collision MATLAB model]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Be sure to show all steps in your solution and include diagrams whenever possible. For a lot of the complicated problems, starting with a diagram and writing down the given information and plugging that into either the momentum or energy principle can help you move forward in the problem. If you still get stuck, try finding similar examples to that problem and look at the solutions to get on the right track.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let’s start with a simple example like the ones you don&#039;t see on the test. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jay and Sarah are best friends. Since they’re best friends they both weigh 55 kg. Jay hadn’t seen Sarah in a long time so when she saw her she ran to her with a velocity of &amp;lt;4,0,0&amp;gt; m/s. Instead of a hug, they were both too excited and collided and bounced back off of each other, and Sarah flew back with a velocity of &amp;lt;7,0,0&amp;gt; m/s. What was Jay’s final velocity?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Problem1.0.png|300px|Problem 1]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a lot of simple elastic collision problems, the momentum principle is all you need to solve them. Most problems will the initial velocities, masses, and one final velocity and you will be asked to solve for a either a final velocity or final momentum. By setting up an equation like the one in this problem, one can easily handle this type of problem.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When far apart, the momentum of a proton is &amp;lt;5.2 ✕ 10−21, 0, 0&amp;gt; kg · m/s as it approaches another proton that is initially at rest. The two protons repel each other electrically, but they are not close enough to touch. When they are far apart again later, one of the protons now has a velocity of &amp;lt;1.75, .82, 0&amp;gt; m/s. At that instant, what is the momentum of the other proton? HINT: Mass of proton is 1.7 *10^-21 kg.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Problem2.0.png|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A lot of people freak out when they see problems involving atomic particles and electrical forces, but the concept is the same no matter the scale. For this problem we are given masses, velocities, and momentum, but the equation p = mv allows us to easily handle these different values. Once again drawing a diagram helps to understand what is actually happening in the problem, making it easier to put the values in the correct places and solve.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Okay, let&#039;s get a little bit trickier here...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a 400 kg train traveling at 55 m/s that collides, elastically of course, with a random 2 kg trashcan that&#039;s stationary on the tracks. So afterwards, what are the speeds of both the train and the trashcan after the collision?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Problem3.0.png|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This was a difficult problem because of the assumptions we had to make in order to solve it. Because the collision was elastic we were able to disregard the change in internal energy in the energy principle, and since it happened so quickly the work done by the track and heat transfer between the surroundings was negligible. It is tough to tell what assumptions you can make and which ones you can&#039;t in problems like these, which is what can make them difficult. On most exams or quizzes the collision problems will be inelastic simply because they are harder, but it is important to understand the fundementals of elastic collisions and how to solve problems involving them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So how are collisions connected to the real world? Collisions are all around us! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One main example is cars! Lots of car companies will purposely test and wreck cars to test collisions! Data is then sent to places like the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety where we can learn about car agility and more. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:crash-test.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another example of collisions in real life is billiards. This is one of the most accurate real life examples of elastic collisions. One ball hits another ball at rest, and if done right the first ball stops and transfers nearly all its kinetic energy into kinetic energy in the second ball. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Pool1.0.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A final example is hitting a baseball. Hitting a ball off the end or to close the hands of a bat will cause some vibrational energy from the collision, but if the ball catches the sweet spot the collision is very elastic, and you don&#039;t feel any vibration when you strike the ball.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Hittingabaseball.jpg|500px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Collisions are certainly not a knew concept in the world. Ever since the beginning or time things have been colliding and reacting in different ways. It was experiments done by scientists like Newton or Rutherford that started to characterize collisions into categories and apply fundamental principles of physics to the reactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The history of collisions originates from the Rutherford Scattering experiment. As Rutherford studied the scattering of alpha particles through metal foils, he first noticed a collision with a single massive positive particle. This lead to the conclusion that the positive charge of the mass was concentrated in the center, the atomic nucleus!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:gold-foil-experiment.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://physicsbook.gatech.edu/Collisions for a general understanding of all collisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://physicsbook.gatech.edu/inelastic_collisions to contrast them from elastic collisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.britannica.com/science/elastic-collision&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.physicsclassroom.com/mmedia/momentum/trece.cfm]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/elacol2.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.boundless.com/physics/textbooks/boundless-physics-textbook/linear-momentum-and-collisions-7/collisions-70/elastic-collisions-in-one-dimension-298-6220/]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Main Idea:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Matter and Interactions, 4th Edition&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.sparknotes.com/testprep/books/sat2/physics/chapter9section4.rhtml&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://blogs.bu.edu/ggarber/archive/bua-physics/collisions-and-conservation-of-momentum/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
History:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elastic_collision&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Connectedness:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.iihs.org/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally used references from &#039;&#039;see also&#039;&#039;.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Samigues3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_11.12.35_AM.png&amp;diff=27925</id>
		<title>File:Screen Shot 2017-04-09 at 11.12.35 AM.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_11.12.35_AM.png&amp;diff=27925"/>
		<updated>2017-04-09T15:12:50Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Samigues3: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Samigues3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_11.10.01_AM.png&amp;diff=27924</id>
		<title>File:Screen Shot 2017-04-09 at 11.10.01 AM.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_11.10.01_AM.png&amp;diff=27924"/>
		<updated>2017-04-09T15:10:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Samigues3: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Samigues3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_11.04.06_AM.png&amp;diff=27916</id>
		<title>File:Screen Shot 2017-04-09 at 11.04.06 AM.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_11.04.06_AM.png&amp;diff=27916"/>
		<updated>2017-04-09T15:04:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Samigues3: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Samigues3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_10.51.29_AM.png&amp;diff=27915</id>
		<title>File:Screen Shot 2017-04-09 at 10.51.29 AM.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_10.51.29_AM.png&amp;diff=27915"/>
		<updated>2017-04-09T14:52:08Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Samigues3: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Samigues3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Elastic_Collisions&amp;diff=27903</id>
		<title>Elastic Collisions</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Elastic_Collisions&amp;diff=27903"/>
		<updated>2017-04-09T14:04:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Samigues3: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;CLAIMED BY SEAN FISCHER AND EDITED BY SOLANGE AMIGUES&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So what exactly is an elastic collision?  I know you’re thinking, “Oh I know all about elasticity,” but LOL this is not bubble gum or rubber bands guys!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An elastic collision is a collision between two or more objects in which there is no loss in kinetic energy before and after the collision. If we assume that the colliding objects are part of the system and that there is no force from the surroundings, the final kinetic energy is still in the same form as it was initially. This is because the surrounding forces are considered to have a negligible impact compared to the forces that occur between the colliding objects. To keep it simple, this means that kinetic energy in= kinetic energy out. Usually, you can determine if a collision is elastic or not by seeing if the objects bounce off one another and/or to not get stuck together after collision (the latter would be an inelastic collision). Remember how your parents always told you what goes in must come out? They were talking about elastic collisions... probably. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, elastic collisions are a wonderful representation of the conservation of momentum which states that the momentum of an isolated system is constant. For an isolated system undergoing an elastic collision momentum in = momentum out. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And I love playing pool because every time a ball hits another and they bounce off one another I’m witnessing an elastic collision so basically I’m a physicist in the lab. The image below demonstrates the main idea of an elastic collision. Boing!! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It&#039;s important to note that with macroscopic systems there are no perfectly elastic collisions because there&#039;s always at least a dab of dissipation (like some thermal energy given off), but most are nearly elastic. The only time there are perfect collisions is on a microscopic level when atomic systems with quantized energy collide, but that&#039;s only if there is enough energy available to raise the systems to an excited quantum state-- but quantum energy is really a whole other topic. Let&#039;s focus on elastic collisions!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
                                                     [[File: boing.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
                         [[File:Elastischer_stoß2.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Check out this funny video on elastic collisions also! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9EqU1_DXUw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now check out this more informative video on elastic collisions: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4vzNk4qppw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now lets take what we know about elastic collisions and talk about it in mathematical terms. There are three main mathematical concepts surrounding elastic collisions:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: CodeCogsEqn.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_9.36.09_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Or you can simply use the middle equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: CodeCogsEqn copy.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_9.11.11_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: CodeCogsEqn_copy_2.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Example Problem&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cart 1, moving in the positive x direction, collides with cart 2 moving in the negative x direction. Both carts have identical masses and the collisions is (nearly) elastic, as it would be if the carts interacted magnetically or repelled each other through soft springs. What are the final momenta of the two carts?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Example1good.jpg|350px|thumb|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. After choosing a correct system, surroundings, and initial and final states, we can apply the momentum principle mentioned above to get a relationship&lt;br /&gt;
between the initial and final momentums of the two carts.  Usually, when we want to consider the system, we will consider the two colliding objects as the system and the rest as the surroundings. The initial state would be before the collision, and the final state would be after.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Momentum Principle:[[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_9.56.06_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And it turns into: [[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_10.03.50_AM.png]] since during the collision, the Fnet is negligible&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Next, by applying the energy principle we can gain knowledge about the final and initial kinetic energies. By acknowledging the fact that the change in internal energy is 0 and the fact the reaction happens so quickly that not work or heat transfer is done by the surroundings, the equation can be simplified to include just initial and final kinetic energies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Once we have simplified the momentum and energy principles, one can use the relationship between kinetic energy and momentum mentioned above to get a relationship involving both energy and momentum. Once this is obtained, the equation can be shifted around to get both the final momentums.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The link below demonstrates a basic car crash elastic collision using MATLAB. Take note of the changes in displacement and the time. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AfCfCS6O2VM Elastic Collision MATLAB model]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Be sure to show all steps in your solution and include diagrams whenever possible. For a lot of the complicated problems, starting with a diagram and writing down the given information and plugging that into either the momentum or energy principle can help you move forward in the problem. If you still get stuck, try finding similar examples to that problem and look at the solutions to get on the right track.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let’s start with a simple example like the ones you don&#039;t see on the test. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jay and Sarah are best friends. Since they’re best friends they both weigh 55 kg. Jay hadn’t seen Sarah in a long time so when she saw her she ran to her with a velocity of &amp;lt;4,0,0&amp;gt; m/s. Instead of a hug, they were both too excited and collided and bounced back off of each other, and Sarah flew back with a velocity of &amp;lt;7,0,0&amp;gt; m/s. What was Jay’s final velocity?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Problem1.0.png|300px|Problem 1]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a lot of simple elastic collision problems, the momentum principle is all you need to solve them. Most problems will the initial velocities, masses, and one final velocity and you will be asked to solve for a either a final velocity or final momentum. By setting up an equation like the one in this problem, one can easily handle this type of problem.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When far apart, the momentum of a proton is &amp;lt;5.2 ✕ 10−21, 0, 0&amp;gt; kg · m/s as it approaches another proton that is initially at rest. The two protons repel each other electrically, but they are not close enough to touch. When they are far apart again later, one of the protons now has a velocity of &amp;lt;1.75, .82, 0&amp;gt; m/s. At that instant, what is the momentum of the other proton? HINT: Mass of proton is 1.7 *10^-21 kg.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Problem2.0.png|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A lot of people freak out when they see problems involving atomic particles and electrical forces, but the concept is the same no matter the scale. For this problem we are given masses, velocities, and momentum, but the equation p = mv allows us to easily handle these different values. Once again drawing a diagram helps to understand what is actually happening in the problem, making it easier to put the values in the correct places and solve.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Okay, let&#039;s get a little bit trickier here...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a 400 kg train traveling at 55 m/s that collides, elastically of course, with a random 2 kg trashcan that&#039;s stationary on the tracks. So afterwards, what are the speeds of both the train and the trashcan after the collision?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Problem3.0.png|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This was a difficult problem because of the assumptions we had to make in order to solve it. Because the collision was elastic we were able to disregard the change in internal energy in the energy principle, and since it happened so quickly the work done by the track and heat transfer between the surroundings was negligible. It is tough to tell what assumptions you can make and which ones you can&#039;t in problems like these, which is what can make them difficult. On most exams or quizzes the collision problems will be inelastic simply because they are harder, but it is important to understand the fundementals of elastic collisions and how to solve problems involving them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So how are collisions connected to the real world? Collisions are all around us! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One main example is cars! Lots of car companies will purposely test and wreck cars to test collisions! Data is then sent to places like the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety where we can learn about car agility and more. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:crash-test.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another example of collisions in real life is billiards. This is one of the most accurate real life examples of elastic collisions. One ball hits another ball at rest, and if done right the first ball stops and transfers nearly all its kinetic energy into kinetic energy in the second ball.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Pool1.0.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another example is hitting a baseball. Hitting a ball off the end or to close the hands of a bat will cause some vibrational energy from the collision, but if the ball catches the sweet spot the collision is very elastic, and you don&#039;t feel any vibration when you strike the ball.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Hittingabaseball.jpg|500px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Collisions are certainly not a knew concept in the world. Ever since the beginning or time things have been colliding and reacting in different ways. It was experiments done by scientists like Newton or Rutherford that started to characterize collisions into categories and apply fundamental principles of physics to the reactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The history of collisions originates from the Rutherford Scattering experiment. As Rutherford studied the scattering of alpha particles through metal foils, he first noticed a collision with a single massive positive particle. This lead to the conclusion that the positive charge of the mass was concentrated in the center, the atomic nucleus!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:gold-foil-experiment.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://physicsbook.gatech.edu/Collisions for a general understanding of all collisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://physicsbook.gatech.edu/inelastic_collisions to contrast them from elastic collisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.britannica.com/science/elastic-collision&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.physicsclassroom.com/mmedia/momentum/trece.cfm]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/elacol2.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.boundless.com/physics/textbooks/boundless-physics-textbook/linear-momentum-and-collisions-7/collisions-70/elastic-collisions-in-one-dimension-298-6220/]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Main Idea:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Matter and Interactions, 4th Edition&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.sparknotes.com/testprep/books/sat2/physics/chapter9section4.rhtml&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://blogs.bu.edu/ggarber/archive/bua-physics/collisions-and-conservation-of-momentum/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
History:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elastic_collision&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Connectedness:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.iihs.org/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally used references from &#039;&#039;see also&#039;&#039;.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Samigues3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_10.03.50_AM.png&amp;diff=27902</id>
		<title>File:Screen Shot 2017-04-09 at 10.03.50 AM.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_10.03.50_AM.png&amp;diff=27902"/>
		<updated>2017-04-09T14:04:18Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Samigues3: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Samigues3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_9.56.06_AM.png&amp;diff=27901</id>
		<title>File:Screen Shot 2017-04-09 at 9.56.06 AM.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_9.56.06_AM.png&amp;diff=27901"/>
		<updated>2017-04-09T13:56:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Samigues3: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Samigues3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Elastic_Collisions&amp;diff=27900</id>
		<title>Elastic Collisions</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Elastic_Collisions&amp;diff=27900"/>
		<updated>2017-04-09T13:41:21Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Samigues3: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;CLAIMED BY SEAN FISCHER AND EDITED BY SOLANGE AMIGUES&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So what exactly is an elastic collision?  I know you’re thinking, “Oh I know all about elasticity,” but LOL this is not bubble gum or rubber bands guys!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An elastic collision is a collision between two or more objects in which there is no loss in kinetic energy before and after the collision. If we assume that the colliding objects are part of the system and that there is no force from the surroundings, the final kinetic energy is still in the same form as it was initially. This is because the surrounding forces are considered to have a negligible impact compared to the forces that occur between the colliding objects. To keep it simple, this means that kinetic energy in= kinetic energy out. Usually, you can determine if a collision is elastic or not by seeing if the objects bounce off one another and/or to not get stuck together after collision (the latter would be an inelastic collision). Remember how your parents always told you what goes in must come out? They were talking about elastic collisions... probably. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, elastic collisions are a wonderful representation of the conservation of momentum which states that the momentum of an isolated system is constant. For an isolated system undergoing an elastic collision momentum in = momentum out. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And I love playing pool because every time a ball hits another and they bounce off one another I’m witnessing an elastic collision so basically I’m a physicist in the lab. The image below demonstrates the main idea of an elastic collision. Boing!! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It&#039;s important to note that with macroscopic systems there are no perfectly elastic collisions because there&#039;s always at least a dab of dissipation (like some thermal energy given off), but most are nearly elastic. The only time there are perfect collisions is on a microscopic level when atomic systems with quantized energy collide, but that&#039;s only if there is enough energy available to raise the systems to an excited quantum state-- but quantum energy is really a whole other topic. Let&#039;s focus on elastic collisions!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
                                                     [[File: boing.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
                         [[File:Elastischer_stoß2.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Check out this funny video on elastic collisions also! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9EqU1_DXUw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now check out this more informative video on elastic collisions: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4vzNk4qppw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now lets take what we know about elastic collisions and talk about it in mathematical terms. There are three main mathematical concepts surrounding elastic collisions:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: CodeCogsEqn.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_9.36.09_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Or you can simply use the middle equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: CodeCogsEqn copy.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_9.11.11_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: CodeCogsEqn_copy_2.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Example Problem&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cart 1, moving in the positive x direction, collides with cart 2 moving in the negative x direction. Both carts have identical masses and the collisions is (nearly) elastic, as it would be if the carts interacted magnetically or repelled each other through soft springs. What are the final momenta of the two carts?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Example1good.jpg|350px|thumb|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. After choosing a correct system, surroundings, and initial and final states, we can apply the momentum principle mentioned above to get a relationship&lt;br /&gt;
between the initial and final momentums of the two carts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Next, by applying the energy principle we can gain knowledge about the final and initial kinetic energies. By acknowledging the fact that the change in internal energy is 0 and the fact the reaction happens so quickly that not work or heat transfer is done by the surroundings, the equation can be simplified to include just initial and final kinetic energies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Once we have simplified the momentum and energy principles, one can use the relationship between kinetic energy and momentum mentioned above to get a relationship involving both energy and momentum. Once this is obtained, the equation can be shifted around to get both the final momentums.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The link below demonstrates a basic car crash elastic collision using MATLAB. Take note of the changes in displacement and the time. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AfCfCS6O2VM Elastic Collision MATLAB model]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Be sure to show all steps in your solution and include diagrams whenever possible. For a lot of the complicated problems, starting with a diagram and writing down the given information and plugging that into either the momentum or energy principle can help you move forward in the problem. If you still get stuck, try finding similar examples to that problem and look at the solutions to get on the right track.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Okay let’s start with a simple example like the ones you don&#039;t see on the test. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jay and Sarah are best friends. Since they’re best friends they both weigh 55 kg. Jay hadn’t seen Sarah in a long time so when she saw her she ran to her with a velocity of &amp;lt;4,0,0&amp;gt; m/s. Instead of a hug, they were both too excited and collided and bounced back off of each other, and Sarah flew back with a velocity of &amp;lt;7,0,0&amp;gt; m/s. What was Jay’s final velocity?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Problem1.0.png|300px|Problem 1]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a lot of simple elastic collision problems, the momentum principle is all you need to solve them. Most problems will the initial velocities, masses, and one final velocity and you will be asked to solve for a either a final velocity or final momentum. By setting up an equation like the one in this problem, one can easily handle this type of problem.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When far apart, the momentum of a proton is &amp;lt;5.2 ✕ 10−21, 0, 0&amp;gt; kg · m/s as it approaches another proton that is initially at rest. The two protons repel each other electrically, but they are not close enough to touch. When they are far apart again later, one of the protons now has a velocity of &amp;lt;1.75, .82, 0&amp;gt; m/s. At that instant, what is the momentum of the other proton? HINT: Mass of proton is 1.7 *10^-21 kg.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Problem2.0.png|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A lot of people freak out when they see problems involving atomic particles and electrical forces, but the concept is the same no matter the scale. For this problem we are given masses, velocities, and momentum, but the equation p = mv allows us to easily handle these different values. Once again drawing a diagram helps to understand what is actually happening in the problem, making it easier to put the values in the correct places and solve.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Okay, let&#039;s get a little bit trickier here...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a 400 kg train traveling at 55 m/s that collides, elastically of course, with a random 2 kg trashcan that&#039;s stationary on the tracks. So afterwards, what are the speeds of both the train and the trashcan after the collision?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Problem3.0.png|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This was a difficult problem because of the assumptions we had to make in order to solve it. Because the collision was elastic we were able to disregard the change in internal energy in the energy principle, and since it happened so quickly the work done by the track and heat transfer between the surroundings was negligible. It is tough to tell what assumptions you can make and which ones you can&#039;t in problems like these, which is what can make them difficult. On most exams or quizzes the collision problems will be inelastic simply because they are harder, but it is important to understand the fundementals of elastic collisions and how to solve problems involving them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So how are collisions connected to the real world? Collisions are all around us! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One main example is cars! Lots of car companies will purposely test and wreck cars to test collisions! Data is then sent to places like the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety where we can learn about car agility and more. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:crash-test.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another example of collisions in real life is billiards. This is one of the most accurate real life examples of elastic collisions. One ball hits another ball at rest, and if done right the first ball stops and transfers nearly all its kinetic energy into kinetic energy in the second ball.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Pool1.0.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another example is hitting a baseball. Hitting a ball off the end or to close the hands of a bat will cause some vibrational energy from the collision, but if the ball catches the sweet spot the collision is very elastic, and you don&#039;t feel any vibration when you strike the ball.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Hittingabaseball.jpg|500px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Collisions are certainly not a knew concept in the world. Ever since the beginning or time things have been colliding and reacting in different ways. It was experiments done by scientists like Newton or Rutherford that started to characterize collisions into categories and apply fundamental principles of physics to the reactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The history of collisions originates from the Rutherford Scattering experiment. As Rutherford studied the scattering of alpha particles through metal foils, he first noticed a collision with a single massive positive particle. This lead to the conclusion that the positive charge of the mass was concentrated in the center, the atomic nucleus!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:gold-foil-experiment.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://physicsbook.gatech.edu/Collisions for a general understanding of all collisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://physicsbook.gatech.edu/inelastic_collisions to contrast them from elastic collisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.britannica.com/science/elastic-collision&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.physicsclassroom.com/mmedia/momentum/trece.cfm]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/elacol2.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.boundless.com/physics/textbooks/boundless-physics-textbook/linear-momentum-and-collisions-7/collisions-70/elastic-collisions-in-one-dimension-298-6220/]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Main Idea:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Matter and Interactions, 4th Edition&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.sparknotes.com/testprep/books/sat2/physics/chapter9section4.rhtml&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://blogs.bu.edu/ggarber/archive/bua-physics/collisions-and-conservation-of-momentum/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
History:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elastic_collision&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Connectedness:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.iihs.org/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally used references from &#039;&#039;see also&#039;&#039;.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Samigues3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Elastic_Collisions&amp;diff=27899</id>
		<title>Elastic Collisions</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Elastic_Collisions&amp;diff=27899"/>
		<updated>2017-04-09T13:38:21Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Samigues3: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;CLAIMED BY SEAN FISCHER AND EDITED BY SOLANGE AMIGUES&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So what exactly is an elastic collision?  I know you’re thinking, “Oh I know all about elasticity,” but LOL this is not bubble gum or rubber bands guys!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An elastic collision is a collision between two or more objects in which there is no loss in kinetic energy before and after the collision. If we assume that the colliding objects are part of the system and that there is no force from the surroundings, the final kinetic energy is still in the same form as it was initially. This is because the surrounding forces are considered to have a negligible impact compared to the forces that occur between the colliding objects. To keep it simple, this means that kinetic energy in= kinetic energy out. Usually, you can determine if a collision is elastic or not by seeing if the objects bounce off one another and/or to not get stuck together after collision (the latter would be an inelastic collision). Remember how your parents always told you what goes in must come out? They were talking about elastic collisions... probably. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, elastic collisions are a wonderful representation of the conservation of momentum which states that the momentum of an isolated system is constant. For an isolated system undergoing an elastic collision momentum in = momentum out. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And I love playing pool because every time a ball hits another and they bounce off one another I’m witnessing an elastic collision so basically I’m a physicist in the lab. The image below demonstrates the main idea of an elastic collision. Boing!! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It&#039;s important to note that with macroscopic systems there are no perfectly elastic collisions because there&#039;s always at least a dab of dissipation (like some thermal energy given off), but most are nearly elastic. The only time there are perfect collisions is on a microscopic level when atomic systems with quantized energy collide, but that&#039;s only if there is enough energy available to raise the systems to an excited quantum state-- but quantum energy is really a whole other topic. Let&#039;s focus on elastic collisions!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
                                                     [[File: boing.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
                         [[File:Elastischer_stoß2.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Check out this funny video on elastic collisions also! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9EqU1_DXUw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now check out this more informative video on elastic collisions: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4vzNk4qppw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now lets take what we know about elastic collisions and talk about it in mathematical terms. There are three main mathematical concepts surrounding elastic collisions:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: CodeCogsEqn.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_9.36.09_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Or you can simply use the middle equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: CodeCogsEqn copy.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_9.11.11_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: CodeCogsEqn_copy_2.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Example Problem&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cart 1, moving in the positive x direction, collides with cart 2 moving in the negative x direction. Both carts have identical masses and the collisions is (nearly) elastic, as it would be if the carts interacted magnetically or repelled each other through soft springs. What are the final momenta of the two carts?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Example1good.jpg|350px|thumb|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. After choosing a correct system, surroundings, and initial and final states, we can apply the momentum principle mentioned above to get a relationship&lt;br /&gt;
between the initial and final momentums of the two carts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Next, by applying the energy principle we can gain knowledge about the final and initial kinetic energies. By acknowledging the fact that the change in internal energy is 0 and the fact the reaction happens so quickly that not work or heat transfer is done by the surroundings, the equation can be simplified to include just initial and final kinetic energies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Once we have simplified the momentum and energy principles, one can use the relationship between kinetic energy and momentum mentioned above to get a relationship involving both energy and momentum. Once this is obtained, the equation can be shifted around to get both the final momentums.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The link below demonstrates a basic car crash elastic collision using MATLAB. Take note of the changes in displacement and the time. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AfCfCS6O2VM Elastic Collision MATLAB model]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Be sure to show all steps in your solution and include diagrams whenever possible. For a lot of the complicated problems, starting with a diagram and writing down the given information and plugging that into either the momentum or energy principle can help you move forward in the problem. If you still get stuck, try finding similar examples to that problem and look at the solutions to get on the right track.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Okay let’s start with a simple example like the ones you don&#039;t see on the test. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jay and Sarah are best friends. Since they’re best friends they both weigh 55 kg. Jay hadn’t seen Sarah in a long time so when she saw her she ran to her with a velocity of &amp;lt;4,0,0&amp;gt; m/s. Instead of a hug, they were both too excited and collided and bounced back off of each other, and Sarah flew back with a velocity of &amp;lt;7,0,0&amp;gt; m/s. What was Jay’s final velocity?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Problem1.0.png|300px|Problem 1]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a lot of simple elastic collision problems, the momentum principle is all you need to solve them. Most problems will the initial velocities, masses, and one final velocity and you will be asked to solve for a either a final velocity or final momentum. By setting up an equation like the one in this problem, one can easily handle this type of problem.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When far apart, the momentum of a proton is &amp;lt;5.2 ✕ 10−21, 0, 0&amp;gt; kg · m/s as it approaches another proton that is initially at rest. The two protons repel each other electrically, but they are not close enough to touch. When they are far apart again later, one of the protons now has a velocity of &amp;lt;1.75, .82, 0&amp;gt; m/s. At that instant, what is the momentum of the other proton? HINT: Mass of proton is 1.7 *10^-21 kg.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Problem2.0.png|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A lot of people freak out when they see problems involving atomic particles and electrical forces, but the concept is the same no matter the scale. For this problem we are given masses, velocities, and momentum, but the equation p = mv allows us to easily handle these different values. Once again drawing a diagram helps to understand what is actually happening in the problem, making it easier to put the values in the correct places and solve.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Okay, let&#039;s get a little bit trickier here...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a 400 kg train traveling at 55 m/s that collides, elastically of course, with a random 2 kg trashcan that&#039;s stationary on the tracks. So afterwards, what are the speeds of both the train and the trashcan after the collision?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Problem3.0.png|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This was a difficult problem because of the assumptions we had to make in order to solve it. Because the collision was elastic we were able to disregard the change in internal energy in the energy principle, and since it happened so quickly the work done by the track and heat transfer between the surroundings was negligible. It is tough to tell what assumptions you can make and which ones you can&#039;t in problems like these, which is what can make them difficult. On most exams or quizzes the collision problems will be inelastic simply because they are harder, but it is important to understand the fundementals of elastic collisions and how to solve problems involving them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So how are collisions connected to the real world? Collisions are all around us! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One main example is cars! Lots of car companies will purposely test and wreck cars to test collisions! Data is then sent to places like the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety where we can learn about car agility and more. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:crash-test.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another example of collisions in real life is billiards. This is one of the most accurate real life examples of elastic collisions. One ball hits another ball at rest, and if done right the first ball stops and transfers nearly all its kinetic energy into kinetic energy in the second ball.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Pool1.0.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another example is hitting a baseball. Hitting a ball off the end or to close the hands of a bat will cause some vibrational energy from the collision, but if the ball catches the sweet spot the collision is very elastic, and you don&#039;t feel any vibration when you strike the ball.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Hittingabaseball.jpg|500px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Collisions are certainly not a knew concept in the world. Ever since the beginning or time things have been colliding and reacting in different ways. It was experiments done by scientists like Newton or Rutherford that started to characterize collisions into categories and apply fundamental principles of physics to the reactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The history of collisions originates from the Rutherford Scattering experiment. As Rutherford studied the scattering of alpha particles through metal foils, he first noticed a collision with a single massive positive particle. This lead to the conclusion that the positive charge of the mass was concentrated in the center, the atomic nucleus!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:gold-foil-experiment.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://physicsbook.gatech.edu/Collisions for a general understanding of all collisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://physicsbook.gatech.edu/inelastic_collisions to contrast them from elastic collisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.britannica.com/science/elastic-collision&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.physicsclassroom.com/mmedia/momentum/trece.cfm]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/elacol2.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.boundless.com/physics/textbooks/boundless-physics-textbook/linear-momentum-and-collisions-7/collisions-70/elastic-collisions-in-one-dimension-298-6220/]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Main Idea:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Matter and Interactions, 4th Edition&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.sparknotes.com/testprep/books/sat2/physics/chapter9section4.rhtml&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://blogs.bu.edu/ggarber/archive/bua-physics/collisions-and-conservation-of-momentum/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
History:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elastic_collision&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Connectedness:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.iihs.org/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally used references from &#039;&#039;see also&#039;&#039;.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Samigues3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_9.36.09_AM.png&amp;diff=27898</id>
		<title>File:Screen Shot 2017-04-09 at 9.36.09 AM.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_9.36.09_AM.png&amp;diff=27898"/>
		<updated>2017-04-09T13:37:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Samigues3: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Samigues3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Elastic_Collisions&amp;diff=27897</id>
		<title>Elastic Collisions</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Elastic_Collisions&amp;diff=27897"/>
		<updated>2017-04-09T13:16:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Samigues3: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;CLAIMED BY SEAN FISCHER AND EDITED BY SOLANGE AMIGUES&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So what exactly is an elastic collision?  I know you’re thinking, “Oh I know all about elasticity,” but LOL this is not bubble gum or rubber bands guys!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An elastic collision is a collision between two or more objects in which there is no loss in kinetic energy before and after the collision. If we assume that the colliding objects are part of the system and that there is no force from the surroundings, the final kinetic energy is still in the same form as it was initially. This is because the surrounding forces are considered to have a negligible impact compared to the forces that occur between the colliding objects. To keep it simple, this means that kinetic energy in= kinetic energy out. Usually, you can determine if a collision is elastic or not by seeing if the objects bounce off one another and/or to not get stuck together after collision (the latter would be an inelastic collision). Remember how your parents always told you what goes in must come out? They were talking about elastic collisions... probably. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, elastic collisions are a wonderful representation of the conservation of momentum which states that the momentum of an isolated system is constant. For an isolated system undergoing an elastic collision momentum in = momentum out. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And I love playing pool because every time a ball hits another and they bounce off one another I’m witnessing an elastic collision so basically I’m a physicist in the lab. The image below demonstrates the main idea of an elastic collision. Boing!! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It&#039;s important to note that with macroscopic systems there are no perfectly elastic collisions because there&#039;s always at least a dab of dissipation (like some thermal energy given off), but most are nearly elastic. The only time there are perfect collisions is on a microscopic level when atomic systems with quantized energy collide, but that&#039;s only if there is enough energy available to raise the systems to an excited quantum state-- but quantum energy is really a whole other topic. Let&#039;s focus on elastic collisions!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
                                                     [[File: boing.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
                         [[File:Elastischer_stoß2.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Check out this funny video on elastic collisions also! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9EqU1_DXUw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now check out this more informative video on elastic collisions: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4vzNk4qppw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now lets take what we know about elastic collisions and talk about it in mathematical terms. There are three main mathematical concepts surrounding elastic collisions:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: CodeCogsEqn.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: CodeCogsEqn copy.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_9.11.11_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: CodeCogsEqn_copy_2.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Example Problem&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cart 1, moving in the positive x direction, collides with cart 2 moving in the negative x direction. Both carts have identical masses and the collisions is (nearly) elastic, as it would be if the carts interacted magnetically or repelled each other through soft springs. What are the final momenta of the two carts?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Example1good.jpg|350px|thumb|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. After choosing a correct system, surroundings, and initial and final states, we can apply the momentum principle mentioned above to get a relationship&lt;br /&gt;
between the initial and final momentums of the two carts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Next, by applying the energy principle we can gain knowledge about the final and initial kinetic energies. By acknowledging the fact that the change in internal energy is 0 and the fact the reaction happens so quickly that not work or heat transfer is done by the surroundings, the equation can be simplified to include just initial and final kinetic energies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Once we have simplified the momentum and energy principles, one can use the relationship between kinetic energy and momentum mentioned above to get a relationship involving both energy and momentum. Once this is obtained, the equation can be shifted around to get both the final momentums.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The link below demonstrates a basic car crash elastic collision using MATLAB. Take note of the changes in displacement and the time. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AfCfCS6O2VM Elastic Collision MATLAB model]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Be sure to show all steps in your solution and include diagrams whenever possible. For a lot of the complicated problems, starting with a diagram and writing down the given information and plugging that into either the momentum or energy principle can help you move forward in the problem. If you still get stuck, try finding similar examples to that problem and look at the solutions to get on the right track.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Okay let’s start with a simple example like the ones you don&#039;t see on the test. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jay and Sarah are best friends. Since they’re best friends they both weigh 55 kg. Jay hadn’t seen Sarah in a long time so when she saw her she ran to her with a velocity of &amp;lt;4,0,0&amp;gt; m/s. Instead of a hug, they were both too excited and collided and bounced back off of each other, and Sarah flew back with a velocity of &amp;lt;7,0,0&amp;gt; m/s. What was Jay’s final velocity?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Problem1.0.png|300px|Problem 1]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a lot of simple elastic collision problems, the momentum principle is all you need to solve them. Most problems will the initial velocities, masses, and one final velocity and you will be asked to solve for a either a final velocity or final momentum. By setting up an equation like the one in this problem, one can easily handle this type of problem.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When far apart, the momentum of a proton is &amp;lt;5.2 ✕ 10−21, 0, 0&amp;gt; kg · m/s as it approaches another proton that is initially at rest. The two protons repel each other electrically, but they are not close enough to touch. When they are far apart again later, one of the protons now has a velocity of &amp;lt;1.75, .82, 0&amp;gt; m/s. At that instant, what is the momentum of the other proton? HINT: Mass of proton is 1.7 *10^-21 kg.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Problem2.0.png|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A lot of people freak out when they see problems involving atomic particles and electrical forces, but the concept is the same no matter the scale. For this problem we are given masses, velocities, and momentum, but the equation p = mv allows us to easily handle these different values. Once again drawing a diagram helps to understand what is actually happening in the problem, making it easier to put the values in the correct places and solve.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Okay, let&#039;s get a little bit trickier here...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a 400 kg train traveling at 55 m/s that collides, elastically of course, with a random 2 kg trashcan that&#039;s stationary on the tracks. So afterwards, what are the speeds of both the train and the trashcan after the collision?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Problem3.0.png|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This was a difficult problem because of the assumptions we had to make in order to solve it. Because the collision was elastic we were able to disregard the change in internal energy in the energy principle, and since it happened so quickly the work done by the track and heat transfer between the surroundings was negligible. It is tough to tell what assumptions you can make and which ones you can&#039;t in problems like these, which is what can make them difficult. On most exams or quizzes the collision problems will be inelastic simply because they are harder, but it is important to understand the fundementals of elastic collisions and how to solve problems involving them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So how are collisions connected to the real world? Collisions are all around us! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One main example is cars! Lots of car companies will purposely test and wreck cars to test collisions! Data is then sent to places like the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety where we can learn about car agility and more. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:crash-test.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another example of collisions in real life is billiards. This is one of the most accurate real life examples of elastic collisions. One ball hits another ball at rest, and if done right the first ball stops and transfers nearly all its kinetic energy into kinetic energy in the second ball.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Pool1.0.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another example is hitting a baseball. Hitting a ball off the end or to close the hands of a bat will cause some vibrational energy from the collision, but if the ball catches the sweet spot the collision is very elastic, and you don&#039;t feel any vibration when you strike the ball.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Hittingabaseball.jpg|500px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Collisions are certainly not a knew concept in the world. Ever since the beginning or time things have been colliding and reacting in different ways. It was experiments done by scientists like Newton or Rutherford that started to characterize collisions into categories and apply fundamental principles of physics to the reactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The history of collisions originates from the Rutherford Scattering experiment. As Rutherford studied the scattering of alpha particles through metal foils, he first noticed a collision with a single massive positive particle. This lead to the conclusion that the positive charge of the mass was concentrated in the center, the atomic nucleus!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:gold-foil-experiment.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://physicsbook.gatech.edu/Collisions for a general understanding of all collisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://physicsbook.gatech.edu/inelastic_collisions to contrast them from elastic collisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.britannica.com/science/elastic-collision&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.physicsclassroom.com/mmedia/momentum/trece.cfm]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/elacol2.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.boundless.com/physics/textbooks/boundless-physics-textbook/linear-momentum-and-collisions-7/collisions-70/elastic-collisions-in-one-dimension-298-6220/]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Main Idea:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Matter and Interactions, 4th Edition&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.sparknotes.com/testprep/books/sat2/physics/chapter9section4.rhtml&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://blogs.bu.edu/ggarber/archive/bua-physics/collisions-and-conservation-of-momentum/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
History:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elastic_collision&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Connectedness:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.iihs.org/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally used references from &#039;&#039;see also&#039;&#039;.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Samigues3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Elastic_Collisions&amp;diff=27896</id>
		<title>Elastic Collisions</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Elastic_Collisions&amp;diff=27896"/>
		<updated>2017-04-09T13:15:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Samigues3: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;CLAIMED BY SEAN FISCHER AND EDITED BY SOLANGE AMIGUES&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So what exactly is an elastic collision?  I know you’re thinking, “Oh I know all about elasticity,” but LOL this is not bubble gum or rubber bands guys!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An elastic collision is a collision between two or more objects in which there is no loss in kinetic energy before and after the collision. If we assume that the colliding objects are part of the system and that there is no force from the surroundings, the final kinetic energy is still in the same form as it was initially. This is because the surrounding forces are considered to have a negligible impact compared to the forces that occur between the colliding objects. To keep it simple, this means that kinetic energy in= kinetic energy out. Usually, you can determine if a collision is elastic or not by seeing if the objects bounce off one another and/or to not get stuck together after collision (the latter would be an inelastic collision). Remember how your parents always told you what goes in must come out? They were talking about elastic collisions... probably. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, elastic collisions are a wonderful representation of the conservation of momentum which states that the momentum of an isolated system is constant. For an isolated system undergoing an elastic collision momentum in = momentum out. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And I love playing pool because every time a ball hits another and they bounce off one another I’m witnessing an elastic collision so basically I’m a physicist in the lab. The image below demonstrates the main idea of an elastic collision. Boing!! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It&#039;s important to note that with macroscopic systems there are no perfectly elastic collisions because there&#039;s always at least a dab of dissipation (like some thermal energy given off), but most are nearly elastic. The only time there are perfect collisions is on a microscopic level when atomic systems with quantized energy collide, but that&#039;s only if there is enough energy available to raise the systems to an excited quantum state-- but quantum energy is really a whole other topic. Let&#039;s focus on elastic collisions!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
                                                     [[File: boing.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
                         [[File:Elastischer_stoß2.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Check out this funny video on elastic collisions also! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9EqU1_DXUw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now check out this more informative video on elastic collisions: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4vzNk4qppw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now lets take what we know about elastic collisions and talk about it in mathematical terms. There are three main mathematical concepts surrounding elastic collisions:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: CodeCogsEqn.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: CodeCogsEqn copy.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_9.11.11_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: CodeCogsEqn_copy_2.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Example Problem&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cart 1, moving in the positive x direction, collides with cart 2 moving in the negative x direction. Both carts have identical masses and the collisions is (nearly) elastic, as it would be if the carts interacted magnetically or repelled each other through soft springs. What are the final momenta of the two carts?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Example1good.jpg|350px|thumb|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. After choosing a correct system, surroundings, and initial and final states, we can apply the momentum principle mentioned above to get a relationship&lt;br /&gt;
between the initial and final momentums of the two carts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Next, by applying the energy principle we can gain knowledge about the final and initial kinetic energies. By acknowledging the fact that the change in internal energy is 0 and the fact the reaction happens so quickly that not work or heat transfer is done by the surroundings, the equation can be simplified to include just initial and final kinetic energies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Once we have simplified the momentum and energy principles, one can use the relationship between kinetic energy and momentum mentioned above to get a relationship involving both energy and momentum. Once this is obtained, the equation can be shifted around to get both the final momentums.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The link below demonstrates a basic car crash elastic collision using MATLAB. Take note of the changes in displacement and the time. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AfCfCS6O2VM Elastic Collision MATLAB model]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Be sure to show all steps in your solution and include diagrams whenever possible. For a lot of the complicated problems, starting with a diagram and writing down the given information and plugging that into either the momentum or energy principle can help you move forward in the problem. If you still get stuck, try finding similar examples to that problem and look at the solutions to get on the right track.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Okay let’s start with a simple example like the ones you don&#039;t see on the test. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jay and Sarah are best friends. Since they’re best friends they both weigh 55 kg. Jay hadn’t seen Sarah in a long time so when she saw her she ran to her with a velocity of &amp;lt;4,0,0&amp;gt; m/s. Instead of a hug, they were both too excited and collided and bounced back off of each other, and Sarah flew back with a velocity of &amp;lt;7,0,0&amp;gt; m/s. What was Jay’s final velocity?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Problem1.0.png|300px|Problem 1]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a lot of simple elastic collision problems, the momentum principle is all you need to solve them. Most problems will the initial velocities, masses, and one final velocity and you will be asked to solve for a either a final velocity or final momentum. By setting up an equation like the one in this problem, one can easily handle this type of problem.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When far apart, the momentum of a proton is &amp;lt;5.2 ✕ 10−21, 0, 0&amp;gt; kg · m/s as it approaches another proton that is initially at rest. The two protons repel each other electrically, but they are not close enough to touch. When they are far apart again later, one of the protons now has a velocity of &amp;lt;1.75, .82, 0&amp;gt; m/s. At that instant, what is the momentum of the other proton? HINT: Mass of proton is 1.7 *10^-21 kg.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Problem2.0.png|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A lot of people freak out when they see problems involving atomic particles and electrical forces, but the concept is the same no matter the scale. For this problem we are given masses, velocities, and momentum, but the equation p = mv allows us to easily handle these different values. Once again drawing a diagram helps to understand what is actually happening in the problem, making it easier to put the values in the correct places and solve.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Okay, let&#039;s get a little bit trickier here...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a 400 kg train traveling at 55 m/s that collides, elastically of course, with a random 2 kg trashcan that&#039;s stationary on the tracks. So afterwards, what are the speeds of both the train and the trashcan after the collision?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Problem3.0.png|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This was a difficult problem because of the assumptions we had to make in order to solve it. Because the collision was elastic we were able to disregard the change in internal energy in the energy principle, and since it happened so quickly the work done by the track and heat transfer between the surroundings was negligible. It is tough to tell what assumptions you can make and which ones you can&#039;t in problems like these, which is what can make them difficult. On most exams or quizzes the collision problems will be inelastic simply because they are harder, but it is important to understand the fundementals of elastic collisions and how to solve problems involving them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So how are collisions connected to the real world? Collisions are all around us! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One main example is cars! Lots of car companies will purposely test and wreck cars to test collisions! Data is then sent to places like the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety where we can learn about car agility and more. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:crash-test.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another example of collisions in real life is billiards. This is one of the most accurate real life examples of elastic collisions. One ball hits another ball at rest, and if done right the first ball stops and transfers nearly all its kinetic energy into kinetic energy in the second ball.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Pool1.0.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another example is hitting a baseball. Hitting a ball off the end or to close the hands of a bat will cause some vibrational energy from the collision, but if the ball catches the sweet spot the collision is very elastic, and you don&#039;t feel any vibration when you strike the ball.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Hittingabaseball.jpg|500px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Collisions are certainly not a knew concept in the world. Ever since the beginning or time things have been colliding and reacting in different ways. It was experiments done by scientists like Newton or Rutherford that started to characterize collisions into categories and apply fundamental principles of physics to the reactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The history of collisions originates from the Rutherford Scattering experiment. As Rutherford studied the scattering of alpha particles through metal foils, he first noticed a collision with a single massive positive particle. This lead to the conclusion that the positive charge of the mass was concentrated in the center, the atomic nucleus!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:gold-foil-experiment.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://physicsbook.gatech.edu/Collisions for a general understanding of all collisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://physicsbook.gatech.edu/inelastic_collisions to contrast them from elastic collisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.britannica.com/science/elastic-collision&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.physicsclassroom.com/mmedia/momentum/trece.cfm]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/elacol2.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.boundless.com/physics/textbooks/boundless-physics-textbook/linear-momentum-and-collisions-7/collisions-70/elastic-collisions-in-one-dimension-298-6220/]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Main Idea:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Matter and Interactions, 4th Edition&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.sparknotes.com/testprep/books/sat2/physics/chapter9section4.rhtml&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://blogs.bu.edu/ggarber/archive/bua-physics/collisions-and-conservation-of-momentum/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
History:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elastic_collision&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Connectedness:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.iihs.org/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally used references from &#039;&#039;see also&#039;&#039;.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Samigues3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Elastic_Collisions&amp;diff=27895</id>
		<title>Elastic Collisions</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Elastic_Collisions&amp;diff=27895"/>
		<updated>2017-04-09T13:14:41Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Samigues3: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;CLAIMED BY SEAN FISCHER AND EDITED BY SOLANGE AMIGUES&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So what exactly is an elastic collision?  I know you’re thinking, “Oh I know all about elasticity,” but LOL this is not bubble gum or rubber bands guys!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An elastic collision is a collision between two or more objects in which there is no loss in kinetic energy before and after the collision. If we assume that the colliding objects are part of the system and that there is no force from the surroundings, the final kinetic energy is still in the same form as it was initially. This is because the surrounding forces are considered to have a negligible impact compared to the forces that occur between the colliding objects. To keep it simple, this means that kinetic energy in= kinetic energy out. Usually, you can determine if a collision is elastic or not by seeing if the objects bounce off one another and/or to not get stuck together after collision (the latter would be an inelastic collision). Remember how your parents always told you what goes in must come out? They were talking about elastic collisions... probably. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, elastic collisions are a wonderful representation of the conservation of momentum which states that the momentum of an isolated system is constant. For an isolated system undergoing an elastic collision momentum in = momentum out. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And I love playing pool because every time a ball hits another and they bounce off one another I’m witnessing an elastic collision so basically I’m a physicist in the lab. The image below demonstrates the main idea of an elastic collision. Boing!! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It&#039;s important to note that with macroscopic systems there are no perfectly elastic collisions because there&#039;s always at least a dab of dissipation (like some thermal energy given off), but most are nearly elastic. The only time there are perfect collisions is on a microscopic level when atomic systems with quantized energy collide, but that&#039;s only if there is enough energy available to raise the systems to an excited quantum state-- but quantum energy is really a whole other topic. Let&#039;s focus on elastic collisions!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
                                                     [[File: boing.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
                         [[File:Elastischer_stoß2.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Check out this funny video on elastic collisions also! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9EqU1_DXUw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now check out this more informative video on elastic collisions: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4vzNk4qppw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now lets take what we know about elastic collisions and talk about it in mathematical terms. There are three main mathematical concepts surrounding elastic collisions:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: CodeCogsEqn.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: CodeCogsEqn copy.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_9.11.11_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: CodeCogsEqn_copy_2.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Example Problem&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cart 1, moving in the positive x direction, collides with cart 2 moving in the negative x direction. Both carts have identical masses and the collisions is (nearly) elastic, as it would be if the carts interacted magnetically or repelled each other through soft springs. What are the final momenta of the two carts?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Example1good.jpg|350px|thumb|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. After choosing a correct system, surroundings, and initial and final states, we can apply the momentum principle mentioned above to get a relationship&lt;br /&gt;
between the initial and final momentums of the two carts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Next, by applying the energy principle we can gain knowledge about the final and initial kinetic energies. By acknowledging the fact that the change in internal energy is 0 and the fact the reaction happens so quickly that not work or heat transfer is done by the surroundings, the equation can be simplified to include just initial and final kinetic energies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Once we have simplified the momentum and energy principles, one can use the relationship between kinetic energy and momentum mentioned above to get a relationship involving both energy and momentum. Once this is obtained, the equation can be shifted around to get both the final momentums.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The link below demonstrates a basic car crash elastic collision using MATLAB. Take note of the changes in displacement and the time. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AfCfCS6O2VM Elastic Collision MATLAB model]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Be sure to show all steps in your solution and include diagrams whenever possible. For a lot of the complicated problems, starting with a diagram and writing down the given information and plugging that into either the momentum or energy principle can help you move forward in the problem. If you still get stuck, try finding similar examples to that problem and look at the solutions to get on the right track.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Okay let’s start with a simple example like the ones you don&#039;t see on the test. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jay and Sarah are best friends. Since they’re best friends they both weigh 55 kg. Jay hadn’t seen Sarah in a long time so when she saw her she ran to her with a velocity of &amp;lt;4,0,0&amp;gt; m/s. Instead of a hug, they were both too excited and collided and bounced back off of each other, and Sarah flew back with a velocity of &amp;lt;7,0,0&amp;gt; m/s. What was Jay’s final velocity?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Problem1.0.png|300px|Problem 1]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a lot of simple elastic collision problems, the momentum principle is all you need to solve them. Most problems will the initial velocities, masses, and one final velocity and you will be asked to solve for a either a final velocity or final momentum. By setting up an equation like the one in this problem, one can easily handle this type of problem.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When far apart, the momentum of a proton is &amp;lt;5.2 ✕ 10−21, 0, 0&amp;gt; kg · m/s as it approaches another proton that is initially at rest. The two protons repel each other electrically, but they are not close enough to touch. When they are far apart again later, one of the protons now has a velocity of &amp;lt;1.75, .82, 0&amp;gt; m/s. At that instant, what is the momentum of the other proton? HINT: Mass of proton is 1.7 *10^-21 kg.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Problem2.0.png|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A lot of people freak out when they see problems involving atomic particles and electrical forces, but the concept is the same no matter the scale. For this problem we are given masses, velocities, and momentum, but the equation p = mv allows us to easily handle these different values. Once again drawing a diagram helps to understand what is actually happening in the problem, making it easier to put the values in the correct places and solve.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Okay, let&#039;s get a little bit trickier here...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a 400 kg train traveling at 55 m/s that collides, elastically of course, with a random 2 kg trashcan that&#039;s stationary on the tracks. So afterwards, what are the speeds of both the train and the trashcan after the collision?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Problem3.0.png|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This was a difficult problem because of the assumptions we had to make in order to solve it. Because the collision was elastic we were able to disregard the change in internal energy in the energy principle, and since it happened so quickly the work done by the track and heat transfer between the surroundings was negligible. It is tough to tell what assumptions you can make and which ones you can&#039;t in problems like these, which is what can make them difficult. On most exams or quizzes the collision problems will be inelastic simply because they are harder, but it is important to understand the fundementals of elastic collisions and how to solve problems involving them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So how are collisions connected to the real world? Collisions are all around us! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One main example is cars! Lots of car companies will purposely test and wreck cars to test collisions! Data is then sent to places like the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety where we can learn about car agility and more. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:crash-test.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another example of collisions in real life is billiards. This is one of the most accurate real life examples of elastic collisions. One ball hits another ball at rest, and if done right the first ball stops and transfers nearly all its kinetic energy into kinetic energy in the second ball.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Pool1.0.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another example is hitting a baseball. Hitting a ball off the end or to close the hands of a bat will cause some vibrational energy from the collision, but if the ball catches the sweet spot the collision is very elastic, and you don&#039;t feel any vibration when you strike the ball.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Hittingabaseball.jpg|500px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Collisions are certainly not a knew concept in the world. Ever since the beginning or time things have been colliding and reacting in different ways. It was experiments done by scientists like Newton or Rutherford that started to characterize collisions into categories and apply fundamental principles of physics to the reactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The history of collisions originates from the Rutherford Scattering experiment. As Rutherford studied the scattering of alpha particles through metal foils, he first noticed a collision with a single massive positive particle. This lead to the conclusion that the positive charge of the mass was concentrated in the center, the atomic nucleus!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:gold-foil-experiment.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://physicsbook.gatech.edu/Collisions for a general understanding of all collisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://physicsbook.gatech.edu/inelastic_collisions to contrast them from elastic collisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.britannica.com/science/elastic-collision&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.physicsclassroom.com/mmedia/momentum/trece.cfm]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/elacol2.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.boundless.com/physics/textbooks/boundless-physics-textbook/linear-momentum-and-collisions-7/collisions-70/elastic-collisions-in-one-dimension-298-6220/]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Main Idea:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Matter and Interactions, 4th Edition&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.sparknotes.com/testprep/books/sat2/physics/chapter9section4.rhtml&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://blogs.bu.edu/ggarber/archive/bua-physics/collisions-and-conservation-of-momentum/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
History:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elastic_collision&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Connectedness:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.iihs.org/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally used references from &#039;&#039;see also&#039;&#039;.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Samigues3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Elastic_Collisions&amp;diff=27894</id>
		<title>Elastic Collisions</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Elastic_Collisions&amp;diff=27894"/>
		<updated>2017-04-09T13:14:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Samigues3: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;CLAIMED BY SEAN FISCHER AND EDITED BY SOLANGE AMIGUES&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So what exactly is an elastic collision?  I know you’re thinking, “Oh I know all about elasticity,” but LOL this is not bubble gum or rubber bands guys!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An elastic collision is a collision between two or more objects in which there is no loss in kinetic energy before and after the collision. If we assume that the colliding objects are part of the system and that there is no force from the surroundings, the final kinetic energy is still in the same form as it was initially. This is because the surrounding forces are considered to have a negligible impact compared to the forces that occur between the colliding objects. To keep it simple, this means that kinetic energy in= kinetic energy out. Usually, you can determine if a collision is elastic or not by seeing if the objects bounce off one another and/or to not get stuck together after collision (the latter would be an inelastic collision). Remember how your parents always told you what goes in must come out? They were talking about elastic collisions... probably. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, elastic collisions are a wonderful representation of the conservation of momentum which states that the momentum of an isolated system is constant. For an isolated system undergoing an elastic collision momentum in = momentum out. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And I love playing pool because every time a ball hits another and they bounce off one another I’m witnessing an elastic collision so basically I’m a physicist in the lab. The image below demonstrates the main idea of an elastic collision. Boing!! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It&#039;s important to note that with macroscopic systems there are no perfectly elastic collisions because there&#039;s always at least a dab of dissipation (like some thermal energy given off), but most are nearly elastic. The only time there are perfect collisions is on a microscopic level when atomic systems with quantized energy collide, but that&#039;s only if there is enough energy available to raise the systems to an excited quantum state-- but quantum energy is really a whole other topic. Let&#039;s focus on elastic collisions!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
                                                     [[File: boing.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
                         [[File:Elastischer_stoß2.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Check out this funny video on elastic collisions also! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9EqU1_DXUw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now check out this more informative video on elastic collisions: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4vzNk4qppw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now lets take what we know about elastic collisions and talk about it in mathematical terms. There are three main mathematical concepts surrounding elastic collisions:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: CodeCogsEqn.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: CodeCogsEqn copy.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_9.11.11_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: CodeCogsEqn_copy_2.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Example Problem&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cart 1, moving in the positive x direction, collides with cart 2 moving in the negative x direction. Both carts have identical masses and the collisions is (nearly) elastic, as it would be if the carts interacted magnetically or repelled each other through soft springs. What are the final momenta of the two carts?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Example1good.jpg|350px|thumb|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. After choosing a correct system, surroundings, and initial and final states, we can apply the momentum principle mentioned above to get a relationship&lt;br /&gt;
between the initial and final momentums of the two carts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Next, by applying the energy principle we can gain knowledge about the final and initial kinetic energies. By acknowledging the fact that the change in internal energy is 0 and the fact the reaction happens so quickly that not work or heat transfer is done by the surroundings, the equation can be simplified to include just initial and final kinetic energies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Once we have simplified the momentum and energy principles, one can use the relationship between kinetic energy and momentum mentioned above to get a relationship involving both energy and momentum. Once this is obtained, the equation can be shifted around to get both the final momentums.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The link below demonstrates a basic car crash elastic collision using MATLAB. Take note of the changes in displacement and the time. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AfCfCS6O2VM Elastic Collision MATLAB model]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Be sure to show all steps in your solution and include diagrams whenever possible. For a lot of the complicated problems, starting with a diagram and writing down the given information and plugging that into either the momentum or energy principle can help you move forward in the problem. If you still get stuck, try finding similar examples to that problem and look at the solutions to get on the right track.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Okay let’s start with a simple example like the ones you don&#039;t see on the test. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jay and Sarah are best friends. Since they’re best friends they both weigh 55 kg. Jay hadn’t seen Sarah in a long time so when she saw her she ran to her with a velocity of &amp;lt;4,0,0&amp;gt; m/s. Instead of a hug, they were both too excited and collided and bounced back off of each other, and Sarah flew back with a velocity of &amp;lt;7,0,0&amp;gt; m/s. What was Jay’s final velocity?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Problem1.0.png|300px|Problem 1]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a lot of simple elastic collision problems, the momentum principle is all you need to solve them. Most problems will the initial velocities, masses, and one final velocity and you will be asked to solve for a either a final velocity or final momentum. By setting up an equation like the one in this problem, one can easily handle this type of problem.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When far apart, the momentum of a proton is &amp;lt;5.2 ✕ 10−21, 0, 0&amp;gt; kg · m/s as it approaches another proton that is initially at rest. The two protons repel each other electrically, but they are not close enough to touch. When they are far apart again later, one of the protons now has a velocity of &amp;lt;1.75, .82, 0&amp;gt; m/s. At that instant, what is the momentum of the other proton? HINT: Mass of proton is 1.7 *10^-21 kg.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Problem2.0.png|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A lot of people freak out when they see problems involving atomic particles and electrical forces, but the concept is the same no matter the scale. For this problem we are given masses, velocities, and momentum, but the equation p = mv allows us to easily handle these different values. Once again drawing a diagram helps to understand what is actually happening in the problem, making it easier to put the values in the correct places and solve.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Okay, let&#039;s get a little bit trickier here...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a 400 kg train traveling at 55 m/s that collides, elastically of course, with a random 2 kg trashcan that&#039;s stationary on the tracks. So afterwards, what are the speeds of both the train and the trashcan after the collision?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Problem3.0.png|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This was a difficult problem because of the assumptions we had to make in order to solve it. Because the collision was elastic we were able to disregard the change in internal energy in the energy principle, and since it happened so quickly the work done by the track and heat transfer between the surroundings was negligible. It is tough to tell what assumptions you can make and which ones you can&#039;t in problems like these, which is what can make them difficult. On most exams or quizzes the collision problems will be inelastic simply because they are harder, but it is important to understand the fundementals of elastic collisions and how to solve problems involving them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So how are collisions connected to the real world? Collisions are all around us! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One main example is cars! Lots of car companies will purposely test and wreck cars to test collisions! Data is then sent to places like the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety where we can learn about car agility and more. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:crash-test.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another example of collisions in real life is billiards. This is one of the most accurate real life examples of elastic collisions. One ball hits another ball at rest, and if done right the first ball stops and transfers nearly all its kinetic energy into kinetic energy in the second ball.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Pool1.0.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another example is hitting a baseball. Hitting a ball off the end or to close the hands of a bat will cause some vibrational energy from the collision, but if the ball catches the sweet spot the collision is very elastic, and you don&#039;t feel any vibration when you strike the ball.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Hittingabaseball.jpg|500px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Collisions are certainly not a knew concept in the world. Ever since the beginning or time things have been colliding and reacting in different ways. It was experiments done by scientists like Newton or Rutherford that started to characterize collisions into categories and apply fundamental principles of physics to the reactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The history of collisions originates from the Rutherford Scattering experiment. As Rutherford studied the scattering of alpha particles through metal foils, he first noticed a collision with a single massive positive particle. This lead to the conclusion that the positive charge of the mass was concentrated in the center, the atomic nucleus!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:gold-foil-experiment.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://physicsbook.gatech.edu/Collisions for a general understanding of all collisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://physicsbook.gatech.edu/inelastic_collisions to contrast them from elastic collisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.britannica.com/science/elastic-collision&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.physicsclassroom.com/mmedia/momentum/trece.cfm]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/elacol2.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.boundless.com/physics/textbooks/boundless-physics-textbook/linear-momentum-and-collisions-7/collisions-70/elastic-collisions-in-one-dimension-298-6220/]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Main Idea:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Matter and Interactions, 4th Edition&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.sparknotes.com/testprep/books/sat2/physics/chapter9section4.rhtml&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://blogs.bu.edu/ggarber/archive/bua-physics/collisions-and-conservation-of-momentum/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
History:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elastic_collision&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Connectedness:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.iihs.org/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally used references from &#039;&#039;see also&#039;&#039;.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Samigues3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Elastic_Collisions&amp;diff=27893</id>
		<title>Elastic Collisions</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Elastic_Collisions&amp;diff=27893"/>
		<updated>2017-04-09T13:13:37Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Samigues3: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;CLAIMED BY SEAN FISCHER AND EDITED BY SOLANGE AMIGUES&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So what exactly is an elastic collision?  I know you’re thinking, “Oh I know all about elasticity,” but LOL this is not bubble gum or rubber bands guys!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An elastic collision is a collision between two or more objects in which there is no loss in kinetic energy before and after the collision. If we assume that the colliding objects are part of the system and that there is no force from the surroundings, the final kinetic energy is still in the same form as it was initially. This is because the surrounding forces are considered to have a negligible impact compared to the forces that occur between the colliding objects. To keep it simple, this means that kinetic energy in= kinetic energy out. Usually, you can determine if a collision is elastic or not by seeing if the objects bounce off one another and/or to not get stuck together after collision (the latter would be an inelastic collision). Remember how your parents always told you what goes in must come out? They were talking about elastic collisions... probably. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, elastic collisions are a wonderful representation of the conservation of momentum which states that the momentum of an isolated system is constant. For an isolated system undergoing an elastic collision momentum in = momentum out. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And I love playing pool because every time a ball hits another and they bounce off one another I’m witnessing an elastic collision so basically I’m a physicist in the lab. The image below demonstrates the main idea of an elastic collision. Boing!! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It&#039;s important to note that with macroscopic systems there are no perfectly elastic collisions because there&#039;s always at least a dab of dissipation (like some thermal energy given off), but most are nearly elastic. The only time there are perfect collisions is on a microscopic level when atomic systems with quantized energy collide, but that&#039;s only if there is enough energy available to raise the systems to an excited quantum state-- but quantum energy is really a whole other topic. Let&#039;s focus on elastic collisions!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
                                                     [[File: boing.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
                         [[File:Elastischer_stoß2.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Check out this funny video on elastic collisions also! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9EqU1_DXUw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now check out this more informative video on elastic collisions: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4vzNk4qppw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now lets take what we know about elastic collisions and talk about it in mathematical terms. There are three main mathematical concepts surrounding elastic collisions:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: CodeCogsEqn.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_9.11.11_AM.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: CodeCogsEqn copy.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: CodeCogsEqn_copy_2.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Example Problem&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cart 1, moving in the positive x direction, collides with cart 2 moving in the negative x direction. Both carts have identical masses and the collisions is (nearly) elastic, as it would be if the carts interacted magnetically or repelled each other through soft springs. What are the final momenta of the two carts?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Example1good.jpg|350px|thumb|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. After choosing a correct system, surroundings, and initial and final states, we can apply the momentum principle mentioned above to get a relationship&lt;br /&gt;
between the initial and final momentums of the two carts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Next, by applying the energy principle we can gain knowledge about the final and initial kinetic energies. By acknowledging the fact that the change in internal energy is 0 and the fact the reaction happens so quickly that not work or heat transfer is done by the surroundings, the equation can be simplified to include just initial and final kinetic energies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Once we have simplified the momentum and energy principles, one can use the relationship between kinetic energy and momentum mentioned above to get a relationship involving both energy and momentum. Once this is obtained, the equation can be shifted around to get both the final momentums.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The link below demonstrates a basic car crash elastic collision using MATLAB. Take note of the changes in displacement and the time. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AfCfCS6O2VM Elastic Collision MATLAB model]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Be sure to show all steps in your solution and include diagrams whenever possible. For a lot of the complicated problems, starting with a diagram and writing down the given information and plugging that into either the momentum or energy principle can help you move forward in the problem. If you still get stuck, try finding similar examples to that problem and look at the solutions to get on the right track.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Okay let’s start with a simple example like the ones you don&#039;t see on the test. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jay and Sarah are best friends. Since they’re best friends they both weigh 55 kg. Jay hadn’t seen Sarah in a long time so when she saw her she ran to her with a velocity of &amp;lt;4,0,0&amp;gt; m/s. Instead of a hug, they were both too excited and collided and bounced back off of each other, and Sarah flew back with a velocity of &amp;lt;7,0,0&amp;gt; m/s. What was Jay’s final velocity?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Problem1.0.png|300px|Problem 1]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a lot of simple elastic collision problems, the momentum principle is all you need to solve them. Most problems will the initial velocities, masses, and one final velocity and you will be asked to solve for a either a final velocity or final momentum. By setting up an equation like the one in this problem, one can easily handle this type of problem.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When far apart, the momentum of a proton is &amp;lt;5.2 ✕ 10−21, 0, 0&amp;gt; kg · m/s as it approaches another proton that is initially at rest. The two protons repel each other electrically, but they are not close enough to touch. When they are far apart again later, one of the protons now has a velocity of &amp;lt;1.75, .82, 0&amp;gt; m/s. At that instant, what is the momentum of the other proton? HINT: Mass of proton is 1.7 *10^-21 kg.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Problem2.0.png|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A lot of people freak out when they see problems involving atomic particles and electrical forces, but the concept is the same no matter the scale. For this problem we are given masses, velocities, and momentum, but the equation p = mv allows us to easily handle these different values. Once again drawing a diagram helps to understand what is actually happening in the problem, making it easier to put the values in the correct places and solve.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Okay, let&#039;s get a little bit trickier here...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a 400 kg train traveling at 55 m/s that collides, elastically of course, with a random 2 kg trashcan that&#039;s stationary on the tracks. So afterwards, what are the speeds of both the train and the trashcan after the collision?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Problem3.0.png|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This was a difficult problem because of the assumptions we had to make in order to solve it. Because the collision was elastic we were able to disregard the change in internal energy in the energy principle, and since it happened so quickly the work done by the track and heat transfer between the surroundings was negligible. It is tough to tell what assumptions you can make and which ones you can&#039;t in problems like these, which is what can make them difficult. On most exams or quizzes the collision problems will be inelastic simply because they are harder, but it is important to understand the fundementals of elastic collisions and how to solve problems involving them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So how are collisions connected to the real world? Collisions are all around us! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One main example is cars! Lots of car companies will purposely test and wreck cars to test collisions! Data is then sent to places like the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety where we can learn about car agility and more. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:crash-test.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another example of collisions in real life is billiards. This is one of the most accurate real life examples of elastic collisions. One ball hits another ball at rest, and if done right the first ball stops and transfers nearly all its kinetic energy into kinetic energy in the second ball.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Pool1.0.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another example is hitting a baseball. Hitting a ball off the end or to close the hands of a bat will cause some vibrational energy from the collision, but if the ball catches the sweet spot the collision is very elastic, and you don&#039;t feel any vibration when you strike the ball.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Hittingabaseball.jpg|500px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Collisions are certainly not a knew concept in the world. Ever since the beginning or time things have been colliding and reacting in different ways. It was experiments done by scientists like Newton or Rutherford that started to characterize collisions into categories and apply fundamental principles of physics to the reactions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The history of collisions originates from the Rutherford Scattering experiment. As Rutherford studied the scattering of alpha particles through metal foils, he first noticed a collision with a single massive positive particle. This lead to the conclusion that the positive charge of the mass was concentrated in the center, the atomic nucleus!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:gold-foil-experiment.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://physicsbook.gatech.edu/Collisions for a general understanding of all collisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://physicsbook.gatech.edu/inelastic_collisions to contrast them from elastic collisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.britannica.com/science/elastic-collision&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.physicsclassroom.com/mmedia/momentum/trece.cfm]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/elacol2.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.boundless.com/physics/textbooks/boundless-physics-textbook/linear-momentum-and-collisions-7/collisions-70/elastic-collisions-in-one-dimension-298-6220/]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Main Idea:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Matter and Interactions, 4th Edition&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.sparknotes.com/testprep/books/sat2/physics/chapter9section4.rhtml&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://blogs.bu.edu/ggarber/archive/bua-physics/collisions-and-conservation-of-momentum/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
History:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elastic_collision&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Connectedness:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.iihs.org/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally used references from &#039;&#039;see also&#039;&#039;.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Samigues3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_9.11.11_AM.png&amp;diff=27892</id>
		<title>File:Screen Shot 2017-04-09 at 9.11.11 AM.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=File:Screen_Shot_2017-04-09_at_9.11.11_AM.png&amp;diff=27892"/>
		<updated>2017-04-09T13:13:13Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Samigues3: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Samigues3</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>