Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle: Difference between revisions
MinkSpaced (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
MinkSpaced (talk | contribs) (image test) |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
[[File:Continuouswave.png|border|caption]] | [[File:Continuouswave.png|border|caption]] | ||
However, why would a particle obey this principle that appears to apply only to waves? Notice that objects at the quantum scale actually exhibit [[Wave- | However, why would a particle obey this principle that appears to apply only to waves? Notice that objects at the quantum scale actually exhibit [[Wave-Particle Duality]]. Anything with a mass, including objects classically thought as discrete particles, have an associated wavelength. What this wave is exactly relates to the particle's position, which is innately probabilistic. The Uncertainty Principle naturally follows the result that this wavelength is dependent on a particle's momentum. | ||
===A Mathematical Model=== | ===A Mathematical Model=== | ||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
An adequately rigorous derivation of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle requires knowledge in the mathematics governing quantum mechanical systems, namely linear algebra with abstract vector spaces. A high-level overview of the mathematics is instead given: | An adequately rigorous derivation of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle requires knowledge in the mathematics governing quantum mechanical systems, namely linear algebra with abstract vector spaces. A high-level overview of the mathematics is instead given: | ||
A quantum system, which in this case can be a single particle, is | A quantum system, which in this case can be a single particle, is represented by a "state vector". The components of this vector contain information on the probabilities associated with measurements. Each "dimension" of this vector corresponds to a possible outcome, and the magnitudes of the vector along each dimension indicates the likelihood the particle will be found in the corresponding state. | ||
What is important is the fact operators can alter the components of the vector, and thus the particle itself. It is not physically possible to measure two entirely distinct quantities at once, so measuring position and momentum means applying one operator and then another (or vice versa). It is then easy to see that the order of application matters. The way two operators can alter (or preserve) a particle's state is summarized by a mathematical object called the commutator. For two objects <math>{\hat{A}}</math> and <math>{\hat{B}}</math>, the commutator is given by | [[File:Colorvector.png|300px|thumb|left|An illustration of a state vector under the fictitious property "color". It is apparent that the outcome "blue" is more likely than the other two outcomes of measurement "red" or "green".]] | ||
The measurement amounts to acting on this vector with an "operator". Every measurable quantity, including position, momentum, energy, and even angular momentum can be paired with a corresponding operator. What is important is the fact operators can alter the components of the vector, and thus the particle itself. It is not physically possible to measure two entirely distinct quantities at once, so measuring position and momentum means applying one operator and then another (or vice versa). It is then easy to see that the order of application matters. The way two operators can alter (or preserve) a particle's state is summarized by a mathematical object called the commutator. For two objects <math>{\hat{A}}</math> and <math>{\hat{B}}</math>, the commutator is given by | |||
<math>{\hat{A}\hat{B}-\hat{B}\hat{A}}</math>. | <math>{\hat{A}\hat{B}-\hat{B}\hat{A}}</math>. |
Revision as of 18:04, 27 November 2022
Claimed by Nicholas Maldonado 11/27/22
Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle
The Heisenberg uncertainty principle is a concept that describes uncertainty relationships between a particle's different properties, those being position and momentum, as well as energy and time.The biggest takeaway from this concept is that there is always some measure of uncertainty in at least one of any given particle's properties.
Generally speaking, uncertainty relationships are not unique to modern physics. This is a concept that occurs in classical physics as well. Consider a wave, described by some combination of sines and cosines. Any wave has an amount of uncertainty between its frequency and its position. For example, a wave with a single period would give you a lot of information about its position, but not much information about its frequency. Conversely, a wave of many periods would allow you to precisely determine its frequency, but the position of the wave would be less certain.
However, why would a particle obey this principle that appears to apply only to waves? Notice that objects at the quantum scale actually exhibit Wave-Particle Duality. Anything with a mass, including objects classically thought as discrete particles, have an associated wavelength. What this wave is exactly relates to the particle's position, which is innately probabilistic. The Uncertainty Principle naturally follows the result that this wavelength is dependent on a particle's momentum.
A Mathematical Model
An adequately rigorous derivation of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle requires knowledge in the mathematics governing quantum mechanical systems, namely linear algebra with abstract vector spaces. A high-level overview of the mathematics is instead given:
A quantum system, which in this case can be a single particle, is represented by a "state vector". The components of this vector contain information on the probabilities associated with measurements. Each "dimension" of this vector corresponds to a possible outcome, and the magnitudes of the vector along each dimension indicates the likelihood the particle will be found in the corresponding state.
The measurement amounts to acting on this vector with an "operator". Every measurable quantity, including position, momentum, energy, and even angular momentum can be paired with a corresponding operator. What is important is the fact operators can alter the components of the vector, and thus the particle itself. It is not physically possible to measure two entirely distinct quantities at once, so measuring position and momentum means applying one operator and then another (or vice versa). It is then easy to see that the order of application matters. The way two operators can alter (or preserve) a particle's state is summarized by a mathematical object called the commutator. For two objects [math]\displaystyle{ {\hat{A}} }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ {\hat{B}} }[/math], the commutator is given by
[math]\displaystyle{ {\hat{A}\hat{B}-\hat{B}\hat{A}} }[/math].
Notice that this is not zero, as the order of the operators matter! From this the minimum uncertainty introduced in one property by the measurement of another property can be found.
The total uncertainty between a particle's position and momentum is given as [math]\displaystyle{ {\Delta p \Delta x} }[/math]. The minimum uncertainty a particle can have is [math]\displaystyle{ {\frac{{\hbar}}{2}} }[/math]. Therefore, we can establish the relationship of:
[math]\displaystyle{ {\Delta p \Delta x \geq \frac{{\hbar}}{2}} }[/math]
Oftentimes, it is also good enough to simply approximate their general relationship as:
[math]\displaystyle{ {\Delta p \Delta x} }[/math] ~ [math]\displaystyle{ {\hbar} }[/math]
NOTE: [math]\displaystyle{ {\hbar = \frac{{h}}{2\pi}} }[/math] where [math]\displaystyle{ {h} }[/math] is Planck's constant.
This principle can also be extended to a relationship between energy and time, where:
[math]\displaystyle{ {\Delta E \Delta t \geq \frac{{\hbar}}{2}} }[/math]
and
[math]\displaystyle{ {\Delta E \Delta t} }[/math] ~ [math]\displaystyle{ {\hbar} }[/math]
A Computational Model
TODO: ADD COMPUTATIONAL MODEL
How do we visualize or predict using this topic. Consider embedding some vpython code here Teach hands-on with GlowScript
Examples
TODO: ADD EXAMPLES
Be sure to show all steps in your solution and include diagrams whenever possible
Simple
Middling
Difficult
Connectedness
- Heisenburg uncertainty principle later plays into quantum tunneling, where this inherent uncertainty in a particle may sometimes allow it to overcome a potential energy barrier it otherwise would not be able to overcome classically.
- As a consequence of Heisenberg uncertainty principle, microelectronics are limited in size because electrons are able to tunnel through transistors that are small enough for uncertainty principle to have an effect.
History
The development of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle is largely accredited to Werner Heisenberg.
Single-slit Diffraction Experiments
Heisenberg uncertainty relationships were first physically demonstrated through single-slit diffraction experiments. The experiment is conducted by launching beam of electrons through a narrow slit. Initially, the electrons have zero momentum in the x-direction. After passing through the slit, information about an electron's x position is acquired, resulting in an increased uncertainty in the particle's x momentum. Making the slit narrower therefore increases the uncertainty of the particle's x momentum while decreasing the uncertainty of its x position, while making the slit wider has the opposite effect. This effectively demonstrates the relationship between the uncertainty of a particle's position and momentum.
See also
Beyond the resources listed here, there are countless other explanations of Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle if you need a deeper look into it.
Further reading
TODO: Books, Articles or other print media on this topic
External links
HyperPhysics
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/uncer.html
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qt-uncertainty/
References
Krane, K. S. (2020). Modern physics. Wiley.
The Uncertainty Principle. Uncertainty principle. (n.d.). Retrieved April 20, 2022, from hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu
Libretexts. (2021, April 23). Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle. Chemistry LibreTexts. Retrieved April 20, 2022, from chem.libretexts.org