Charged Cylinder: Difference between revisions

From Physics Book
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 85: Line 85:
The x and y components of <math>\vec{E}_{net}</math> will be zero, because the symmetry of the rings will cancel those components out. Therefore, the z component of <math>\vec{E}_{net}</math> is the only one that needs to be computed through integration. The limits of integration, because the coordinate system was changed to be at the center of the cylinder, are <math>\frac{L}{2}</math> and <math>-\frac{L}{2}</math>.
The x and y components of <math>\vec{E}_{net}</math> will be zero, because the symmetry of the rings will cancel those components out. Therefore, the z component of <math>\vec{E}_{net}</math> is the only one that needs to be computed through integration. The limits of integration, because the coordinate system was changed to be at the center of the cylinder, are <math>\frac{L}{2}</math> and <math>-\frac{L}{2}</math>.


<math>E_z = \int\limits_{-\frac{L}{2}^{\frac{L}{2}}\ \frac{Qdz}{4π\epsilon_0L} (\frac{1}{(w-z)^2}-\frac{3R^2}{2(w-z)^4})</math>
<math>E_z = \int\limits_{-L/2)^{L/2}\ \frac{Qdz}{4π\epsilon_0L} (\frac{1}{(w-z)^2}-\frac{3R^2}{2(w-z)^4})</math>


To make the integration easier, <math>r</math> can be substituted in for <math>w-z</math>, and <math>dr</math> can be substituted for <math>dz</math>. It is important to remember that <math>w-z</math> is the variable we are integrating through, and therefore a more correct form of <math>dz</math> is <math>d(w-z)</math>, making this a viable substitution. With these substitutions, the new equation to be integrated is:
To make the integration easier, <math>r</math> can be substituted in for <math>w-z</math>, and <math>dr</math> can be substituted for <math>dz</math>. It is important to remember that <math>w-z</math> is the variable we are integrating through, and therefore a more correct form of <math>dz</math> is <math>d(w-z)</math>, making this a viable substitution. With these substitutions, the new equation to be integrated is:


<math>E_z = \int\limits_{-\frac{L}{2}^{\frac{L}{2}}\ \frac{Qdr}{4π\epsilon_0L} (\frac{1}{r^2}-\frac{3R^2}{2r^4})</math>
<math>E_z = \int\limits_{-L/2)^{L/2}\ \frac{Qdr}{4π\epsilon_0L} (\frac{1}{r^2}-\frac{3R^2}{2r^4})</math>


==Examples==
==Examples==

Revision as of 13:53, 4 December 2015

Electric Field

Topic reserved by Jennifer Burkhardt

The electric field of a uniformly charged cylinder of length [math]\displaystyle{ L }[/math] and radius [math]\displaystyle{ R }[/math] can be found through viewing the cylinder as a collection of long uniformly charged rods forming a circle or a series of uniformly charged rings stacked on top of another. Before determining which method to use, the point of observation must be decided.

Uniformly Charged Rods

If measuring the electric field of a cylinder from an observation point that is at the center of the cylinder, the method of rods would be most useful.

L≫R

The location vector from the center of a rod can be determined in terms of the angle θ.

[math]\displaystyle{ \vec{r} = \lt 0,0,0\gt - \lt 0,R*sinθ,R*cosθ\gt = \lt 0,-R*sinθ,-R*cosθ\gt }[/math] [math]\displaystyle{ \hat{r} = \frac{\vec{r}}{r} = \lt 0,-sinθ,-cosθ\gt }[/math]

The amount of charge on one of the rods, assuming that the cylinder is complete, is given by:

[math]\displaystyle{ dQ = Q\frac{dθ}{θ(total)} = \frac{Qdθ}{θ(total)} }[/math]

[math]\displaystyle{ dθ }[/math] is the angular width of one rod, and [math]\displaystyle{ θ(total) }[/math] is the angular extent of the cylinder.

The contribution of this individual rod to the total electric field,, assuming that the cylinder is complete, is:

[math]\displaystyle{ \Delta \vec{E} = |\Delta \vec{E}| \vec{r} ≈ \frac{1}{4π\epsilon_0} \frac{2dQ}{L} \frac{1}{R} \lt 0,-sinθ,-cosθ\gt = \frac{1}{4π\epsilon_0} \frac{2}{LR} \frac{Qdθ}{θ(total)} \lt 0,-sinθ,-cosθ\gt }[/math]

To find the total electric field from all of the rods, the integral of the electric field will have to be taken from the x, y, and z components separately.

[math]\displaystyle{ E_x = \int\limits_0^{θ(total)}\ \frac{1}{4π\epsilon_0} \frac{2}{LR} \frac{Q}{θ(total)} * 0dθ = 0 }[/math]

[math]\displaystyle{ E_y = \int\limits_{0}^{θ(total)}\ \frac{1}{4π\epsilon_0} \frac{2}{LR} \frac{Q}{θ(total)} * (-sinθ)dθ = \frac{1}{4π\epsilon_0} \frac{2Q}{LRθ(total)} cosθ|_{0}^{θ(total)} }[/math]

[math]\displaystyle{ E_z = \int\limits_{0}^{θ(total)}\ \frac{1}{4π\epsilon_0} \frac{2}{LR} \frac{Q}{θ(total)} * (-cosθ)dθ = \frac{-1}{4π\epsilon_0} \frac{2Q}{LRθ(total)} sinθ|_{0}^{θ(total)} }[/math]

Without Approximation

The location vector from the center of a rod can be determined in terms of the angle θ.

[math]\displaystyle{ \vec{r} = \lt 0,0,0\gt - \lt 0,R*sinθ,R*cosθ\gt = \lt 0,-R*sinθ,-R*cosθ\gt }[/math] [math]\displaystyle{ \hat{r} = \frac{\vec{r}}{r} = \lt 0,-sinθ,-cosθ\gt }[/math]

The amount of charge on one of the rods, assuming that the cylinder is complete, is given by:

[math]\displaystyle{ dQ = Q\frac{dθ}{θ(total)} = \frac{Qdθ}{θ(total)} }[/math]

[math]\displaystyle{ dθ }[/math] is the angular width of one rod, and [math]\displaystyle{ θ(total) }[/math] is the angular extent of the cylinder.

The contribution of this individual rod to the total electric field, is:

[math]\displaystyle{ \Delta \vec{E} = |\Delta \vec{E}| \vec{r} = \frac{1}{4π\epsilon_0}\frac{dQ}{R*sqrt(R^2+(L/2)^2)} \lt 0,-sinθ,-cosθ\gt = \frac{1}{4π\epsilon_0} \frac{1}{R*sqrt(R^2+(L/2)^2)} \frac{Qdθ}{θ(total)} \lt 0,-sinθ,-cosθ\gt }[/math]

To find the total electric field from all of the rods, the integral of the electric field will have to be taken from the x, y, and z components separately.

[math]\displaystyle{ E_x = \int\limits_0^{θ(total)}\ \frac{1}{4π\epsilon_0} \frac{1}{R*sqrt(R^2+(L/2)^2)} \frac{Q}{θ(total)} * 0dθ = 0 }[/math]

[math]\displaystyle{ E_y = \int\limits_{0}^{θ(total)}\ \frac{1}{4π\epsilon_0} \frac{1}{R*sqrt(R^2+(L/2)^2)} \frac{Q}{θ(total)} * (-sinθ)dθ = \frac{1}{4π\epsilon_0} \frac{1}{R*sqrt(R^2+(L/2)^2)} \frac{Q}{θ(total)} cosθ|_{0}^{θ(total)} }[/math]

[math]\displaystyle{ E_z = \int\limits_{0}^{θ(total)}\ \frac{1}{4π\epsilon_0} \frac{1}{R*sqrt(R^2+(L/2)^2)} \frac{Q}{θ(total)} * (-cosθ)dθ = \frac{1}{4π\epsilon_0} \frac{1}{R*sqrt(R^2+(L/2)^2)} \frac{Q}{θ(total)} sinθ|_{0}^{θ(total)} }[/math]

Uniformly Charged Rings

If measuring the electric field of a cylinder from an observation point that is away from the cylinder in the z-direction (assuming that the circles the cylinder is composed of reside in the x-y plane), the method of rings will be most useful.

Reconfigure the middle of the cylinder ([math]\displaystyle{ L/2 }[/math]) to be the origin of the coordinate system, making your observation location [math]\displaystyle{ \lt 0,0,w\gt }[/math] away from the center of the cylinder.

z≫R, z≫L

The location vector from the observation location to a representative ring of charge at location [math]\displaystyle{ \lt 0,0,z\gt }[/math] is:

[math]\displaystyle{ \vec{r} = \lt 0,0,w\gt - \lt 0,0,z\gt = \lt 0,0,w-z\gt }[/math]

The amount of charge on the representative ring at location [math]\displaystyle{ \lt 0,0,z\gt }[/math] with length [math]\displaystyle{ dz }[/math] can be found through:

[math]\displaystyle{ \frac{Q}{L} = \frac{dQ}{dz} }[/math] [math]\displaystyle{ dQ = \frac{Qdz}{L} }[/math]

The electric field from a single ring, on axis, can be approximated as:

[math]\displaystyle{ |\vec{E}_{ring}| ≈ \frac{Q}{4π\epsilon_0} (\frac{1}{z^2}-\frac{3R^2}{2z^4}) }[/math]

Therefore, the electric field from the portion of the cylinder can be found, making the substitution for [math]\displaystyle{ w-z }[/math] (found through the location vector) instead of [math]\displaystyle{ z }[/math], to be:

[math]\displaystyle{ \Delta \vec{E} = |\Delta \vec{E}| \hat{z} ≈ \frac{dQ}{4π\epsilon_0} (\frac{1}{(w-z)^2}-\frac{3R^2}{2(w-z)^4}) \hat{z} = \frac{Qdz}{4π\epsilon_0L} (\frac{1}{(w-z)^2}-\frac{3R^2}{2(w-z)^4}) \hat{z} }[/math]

The x and y components of [math]\displaystyle{ \vec{E}_{net} }[/math] will be zero, because the symmetry of the rings will cancel those components out. Therefore, the z component of [math]\displaystyle{ \vec{E}_{net} }[/math] is the only one that needs to be computed through integration. The limits of integration, because the coordinate system was changed to be at the center of the cylinder, are [math]\displaystyle{ \frac{L}{2} }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ -\frac{L}{2} }[/math].

[math]\displaystyle{ E_z = \int\limits_{-L/2)^{L/2}\ \frac{Qdz}{4π\epsilon_0L} (\frac{1}{(w-z)^2}-\frac{3R^2}{2(w-z)^4}) }[/math]

To make the integration easier, [math]\displaystyle{ r }[/math] can be substituted in for [math]\displaystyle{ w-z }[/math], and [math]\displaystyle{ dr }[/math] can be substituted for [math]\displaystyle{ dz }[/math]. It is important to remember that [math]\displaystyle{ w-z }[/math] is the variable we are integrating through, and therefore a more correct form of [math]\displaystyle{ dz }[/math] is [math]\displaystyle{ d(w-z) }[/math], making this a viable substitution. With these substitutions, the new equation to be integrated is:

[math]\displaystyle{ E_z = \int\limits_{-L/2)^{L/2}\ \frac{Qdr}{4π\epsilon_0L} (\frac{1}{r^2}-\frac{3R^2}{2r^4}) }[/math]

Examples

Be sure to show all steps in your solution and include diagrams whenever possible

Simple

Find the net electric field at the center of a half cylinder, projected on the z-axis, that is 2 meters long, has a radius of .05 meters (2≫.05), and has a 3 Coulomb charge.

Solution

[math]\displaystyle{ dQ = Q\frac{dθ}{π} = \frac{Qdθ}{π} }[/math]

[math]\displaystyle{ \vec{E}_{net} = \lt x,y,z\gt }[/math]

Middling

Solution

Difficult

Solution

History

Put this idea in historical context. Give the reader the Who, What, When, Where, and Why.

See also

Are there related topics or categories in this wiki resource for the curious reader to explore? How does this topic fit into that context?

Further reading

Books, Articles or other print media on this topic

External links

Internet resources on this topic

References

This section contains the the references you used while writing this page