Potential Energy of a Multiparticle System: Difference between revisions
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
However, it is quite apparent from the experimental observation that the kinetic energy of the ball increased since it acquired speed when dropping, and that the kinetic energy of the Earth also increased in a small amount since the gravitational force between the ball and the Earth drew the Earth towards the ball. In other words, the experimental observation indicates that <math>\Delta K_{ball} > 0</math> and <math>\Delta K_{earth} > 0</math>. This seems to introduce a conflict between a real-world experiment and a fundamental principle in Physics, where the experiment indicates that the kinetic energy of the two-body system (ball + Earth) increased, while the energy principle states that the energy change of the system be zero since no significant work is done by the surroundings on the system. '''This can't be correct!''' One may decide that the fundamental Energy Principle has been violated. But wait! Is it possible that some energy component is overlooked during this process? | However, it is quite apparent from the experimental observation that the kinetic energy of the ball increased since it acquired speed when dropping, and that the kinetic energy of the Earth also increased in a small amount since the gravitational force between the ball and the Earth drew the Earth towards the ball. In other words, the experimental observation indicates that <math>\Delta K_{ball} > 0</math> and <math>\Delta K_{earth} > 0</math>. This seems to introduce a conflict between a real-world experiment and a fundamental principle in Physics, where the experiment indicates that the kinetic energy of the two-body system (ball + Earth) increased, while the energy principle states that the energy change of the system be zero since no significant work is done by the surroundings on the system. '''This can't be correct!''' One may decide that the fundamental Energy Principle has been violated. But wait! Is it possible that some energy component is overlooked during this process? | ||
In fact, some energy component is missing from the energy principle for systems that contain more than one interacting object: the potential energy, commonly designated as <math>U</math>. In particular, any system that consists of more than one particle (multiparticle systems) such as the ball-Earth system, compressed/stretched springs, or atoms in which protons and electrons interact electrically, have a type of energy that is associated with the interactions between pairs of particles inside the system. In the ball-Earth system, it is associated with the interaction between the ball and the Earth, and it is different from the rest energies of the ball or the Earth, and different from the kinetic energies of the two individual particles. This specific type of pairwise interaction energy is referred to as | In fact, some energy component is missing from the energy principle for systems that contain more than one interacting object: the potential energy, commonly designated as <math>U</math>. In particular, any system that consists of more than one particle (multiparticle systems) such as the ball-Earth system, compressed/stretched springs, or atoms in which protons and electrons interact electrically, have a type of energy that is associated with the interactions between pairs of particles inside the system. In the ball-Earth system, it is associated with the interaction between the ball and the Earth, and it is different from the rest energies of the ball or the Earth, and different from the kinetic energies of the two individual particles. This specific type of pairwise interaction energy is referred to as ''potential energy'' for multiparticle systems. | ||
Revision as of 21:59, 27 November 2016
Claimed By yzhang637 - 2016 Fall
This wikipage discusses the definition and significance of the potential energy in a multiparticle system, and exemplifies it in different contexts.
The Main Idea
Imagine you drop a ball with a mass of [math]\displaystyle{ M }[/math] near the surface of the earth at the height of [math]\displaystyle{ h }[/math]. If the ball alone is considered to be the system, i.e., the Earth is the surrounding, it is straightforward to find that the kinetic energy of the system (ball) increases, due to the positive work done on the ball by the Earth. In other words, as the gravitational force acts in the same direction as the displacement of the ball, the work done by the surroundings (the Earth) is equal to [math]\displaystyle{ Mgh }[/math].
What if you choose the system to contain both the ball and the Earth? In this case, nothing is significant in the surroundings to exert any work on the system. As a result,
[math]\displaystyle{ \Delta K_{sys} = W_{surr} }[/math] => [math]\displaystyle{ \Delta K_{ball} + K_{earth} = 0 }[/math]
However, it is quite apparent from the experimental observation that the kinetic energy of the ball increased since it acquired speed when dropping, and that the kinetic energy of the Earth also increased in a small amount since the gravitational force between the ball and the Earth drew the Earth towards the ball. In other words, the experimental observation indicates that [math]\displaystyle{ \Delta K_{ball} \gt 0 }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ \Delta K_{earth} \gt 0 }[/math]. This seems to introduce a conflict between a real-world experiment and a fundamental principle in Physics, where the experiment indicates that the kinetic energy of the two-body system (ball + Earth) increased, while the energy principle states that the energy change of the system be zero since no significant work is done by the surroundings on the system. This can't be correct! One may decide that the fundamental Energy Principle has been violated. But wait! Is it possible that some energy component is overlooked during this process?
In fact, some energy component is missing from the energy principle for systems that contain more than one interacting object: the potential energy, commonly designated as [math]\displaystyle{ U }[/math]. In particular, any system that consists of more than one particle (multiparticle systems) such as the ball-Earth system, compressed/stretched springs, or atoms in which protons and electrons interact electrically, have a type of energy that is associated with the interactions between pairs of particles inside the system. In the ball-Earth system, it is associated with the interaction between the ball and the Earth, and it is different from the rest energies of the ball or the Earth, and different from the kinetic energies of the two individual particles. This specific type of pairwise interaction energy is referred to as potential energy for multiparticle systems.
State, in your own words, the main idea for this topic Electric Field of Capacitor
A Mathematical Model
What are the mathematical equations that allow us to model this topic. For example [math]\displaystyle{ {\frac{d\vec{p}}{dt}}_{system} = \vec{F}_{net} }[/math] where p is the momentum of the system and F is the net force from the surroundings.
A Computational Model
How do we visualize or predict using this topic. Consider embedding some vpython code here Teach hands-on with GlowScript
Examples
Be sure to show all steps in your solution and include diagrams whenever possible
Simple
Middling
Difficult
Connectedness
- How is this topic connected to something that you are interested in?
- How is it connected to your major?
- Is there an interesting industrial application?
History
Put this idea in historical context. Give the reader the Who, What, When, Where, and Why.
See also
Are there related topics or categories in this wiki resource for the curious reader to explore? How does this topic fit into that context?
Further reading
Books, Articles or other print media on this topic
External links
Internet resources on this topic
References
This section contains the the references you used while writing this page