Conductivity and Resistivity: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
Naturally, this is exactly the scenario present in a standard wire. The next two relevant equations are two statements of the same fact, which we call Ohm's law. Precisely, it governs the relationship between the flow of charge and the electric field which produces that flow. The first form states this explicitly: | Naturally, this is exactly the scenario present in a standard wire. The next two relevant equations are two statements of the same fact, which we call Ohm's law. Precisely, it governs the relationship between the flow of charge and the electric field which produces that flow. The first form states this explicitly: | ||
Through this equation, the "skin effect" is produced. | Through this equation, the "skin effect" is produced. | ||
Line 67: | Line 68: | ||
This topic is largely conceptual and algebraic, so there is relatively little modeling to be done. However, [https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1hR-F7dQk4ZadIB3DEhZZPvnTmmGpj1hQ this] program is designed to create plots of the relationship between resistance, resistivity, length and cross sectional area. | This topic is largely conceptual and algebraic, so there is relatively little modeling to be done. However, [https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1hR-F7dQk4ZadIB3DEhZZPvnTmmGpj1hQ this] program is designed to create plots of the relationship between resistance, resistivity, length and cross sectional area. | ||
Code shows the relationship between: | [[Code shows the relationship between:]] | ||
Resistance and length across different fixed points | Resistance and length across different fixed points | ||
Line 76: | Line 77: | ||
Furthermore, [https://phet.colorado.edu/sims/html/resistance-in-a-wire/latest/resistance-in-a-wire_en.html this] external program provides a good visual demonstration of the relationship (but unfortunately the source code is not accessible). | Furthermore, [https://phet.colorado.edu/sims/html/resistance-in-a-wire/latest/resistance-in-a-wire_en.html this] external program provides a good visual demonstration of the relationship (but unfortunately the source code is not accessible). | ||
==Examples== | [[==Examples==]] | ||
===Simple=== | [[===Simple===]] | ||
'''Example Number 1''' | '''Example Number 1''' | ||
Line 207: | Line 208: | ||
==History== | ==History== | ||
The first scientist to contribute substantially to the study of conductivity and resistivity was Stephen Gray, who with his friend Ganvil Wheler noticed that electricity could be transmitted a distance, and that the effectiveness of this transmission varied between a wire of silk and wire of brass <ref> http://histoires-de-sciences.over-blog.fr/2018/04/history-of-electricity.the-discovery-of-conductors-and-insulators-by-gray-dufay-and-franklin.html </ref>. A substantial amount of discovery then followed, including the famous contributions of Benjamin Franklin, but these developments are more relevant to other subjects. It was in the early 19th century that the equation for determining resistance from resistivity and geometry was determined by Antoine Becquerel (grandfather to Henri Becquerel, who was a pioneer in radioactivity alongside Marie Skłodowska Curie and Pierre Curie)<ref> https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Popular_Science_Monthly/Volume_83/December_1913/The_History_of_Ohm%27s_Law</ref>. Not long after, Georg Ohm proposed an incorrect theorem for the relation between current, potential and resistance, then soon amended it to the correct formula. The correction, philosophical differences, and confusion at the time about the definitions of resistance, current and potential led his work to be poorly received at first, but ultimately accepted and celebrated about 15 years after its release. | The first scientist to contribute substantially to the study of conductivity and resistivity was Stephen Gray, who with his friend Ganvil Wheler noticed that electricity could be transmitted a distance, and that the effectiveness of this transmission varied between a wire of silk and wire of brass <ref> http://histoires-de-sciences.over-blog.fr/2018/04/history-of-electricity.the-discovery-of-conductors-and-insulators-by-gray-dufay-and-franklin.html </ref>. A substantial amount of discovery then followed, including the famous contributions of Benjamin Franklin, but these developments are more relevant to other subjects. | ||
It was in the early 19th century that the equation for determining resistance from resistivity and geometry was determined by Antoine Becquerel (grandfather to Henri Becquerel, who was a pioneer in radioactivity alongside Marie Skłodowska Curie and Pierre Curie)<ref> https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Popular_Science_Monthly/Volume_83/December_1913/The_History_of_Ohm%27s_Law</ref>. Not long after, Georg Ohm proposed an incorrect theorem for the relation between current, potential and resistance, then soon amended it to the correct formula. The correction, philosophical differences, and confusion at the time about the definitions of resistance, current and potential led his work to be poorly received at first, but ultimately accepted and celebrated about 15 years after its release. | |||
Revision as of 21:03, 15 November 2020
'This page was constructed from an amalgamation of Conductivity and Resistivity, then edited by Elizabeth Pettit, Fall 2020'
Conductivity is the degree to which a specified material conducts electricity, calculated as the ratio of the current density in the material to the electric field that causes the flow of current. Resistivity is the reciprocal of conductivity, and so the two are interchangeable as long as one tracks the inversions (and, correspondingly, the units). Electrical conductivity tells us how well a material will allow electricity to travel through it, and is similar to thermal conductivity, which tells us the ease with which thermal energy (heat for most purposes) can move through the material[1].
Main Idea
A conductor is a material which gives very little resistance to the flow of an electric current. The resistivity of a material is not just dependent on the free electrons in the material but it is also dependent on the temperature at which the object is held at.
Correspondingly, an insulator is a material which is very resistant to the flow of electric current. Semiconductors are materials which display the properties of both conductors and insulators. The most common example of conductive materials are metals, while insulators include materials such as wood or plastics [3]. Semiconductors are generally more rare, but are necessary for the construction of transistors, and as such are present in all computers, with the most common being doped silicon[4]. In addition to these categories, there are superconductors, which have zero resistance under certain conditions (generally extremely low temperatures and/or extremely high pressures)[5], and there also exist a host of other materials with odd behaviors.
Units For Conductivity and Resistivity:
The units for conductivity and resistivity are most naturally expressed in terms of the recognizable Ohm ([math]\displaystyle{ \Omega }[/math]). Resistivity has units of [math]\displaystyle{ \Omega \cdot m }[/math], so conductivity has units of [math]\displaystyle{ \frac{1}{\Omega \cdot m} }[/math]. Expressed in terms of SI base units, the unit of resistivity becomes [math]\displaystyle{ \frac{kg\cdot m^3}{s^3\cdot A^2} = \frac{kg\cdot m^3}{s\cdot C^2} }[/math].
Factors that influence the resistivity of an object:
~temperature the material is held in
~concentrations of ions (an electrolyte moves through water carrying electrical currents.
~type of ions [6]
~ if rock, pore saturation
Mathematical Method
First, we have the relation between conductivity and resistivity:
[math]\displaystyle{ \sigma = \frac{1}{\rho} }[/math]
By convention, we have [math]\displaystyle{ \sigma }[/math] as the conductivity, and [math]\displaystyle{ \rho }[/math] as the resistivity.

Conductivity and Resistivity are properties of a material, dependent primarily on its chemical composition and structure, but also on its temperature and other environmental factors. As such, for our purposes it will always be either a know value, plugged into an equation, or an unknown value, derived from that equation. Our interest is therefore in those equations. The first is on the idealized relation between resistivity and resistance:
[math]\displaystyle{ R = \frac{\rho L}{A} }[/math]
In this, resistance is [math]\displaystyle{ R }[/math], the length of the wire is [math]\displaystyle{ L }[/math], [math]\displaystyle{ rho }[/math] is equal to resistivity and the variable [math]\displaystyle{ A }[/math] is its cross sectional area. This assumes that there is a clearly defined length (parallel to the direction of current flow) and cross sectional area (perpendicular to the direction of current flow).
Area of a conductor can be adjusted by making additional connections to the conductor in a circuit. For example, If you had a current pointing from North to South, by attaching a second conductor parallel to the first one the area. of the conductor would be doubled.
As seen by the equation [math]\displaystyle{ R = \frac{\rho L}{A} }[/math], doubling the Area would cut the resistance in half and effectively double the conductance of the circuit containing the conductors seeing that [math]\displaystyle{ \sigma = \frac{1}{\rho} }[/math]
Naturally, this is exactly the scenario present in a standard wire. The next two relevant equations are two statements of the same fact, which we call Ohm's law. Precisely, it governs the relationship between the flow of charge and the electric field which produces that flow. The first form states this explicitly:
Through this equation, the "skin effect" is produced.
The "skin effect" consists of an explanation for the relationship between the current density and the radius of a wire. It explains that the thicker the wire (the bigger the radius), the larger the current density.
[math]\displaystyle{ \vec{J} = \sigma \vec{E} }[/math]
Here [math]\displaystyle{ \vec{J} }[/math] is the current density, and [math]\displaystyle{ \vec{E} }[/math] is the electric field as we've seen before. An aside on current density: it is the amount of charge which passes through a given cross sectional area in a given period of time, with SI units [math]\displaystyle{ \frac{A}{m^2} = \frac{C}{m^2 \cdot s} }[/math]. This means that it is a density with area in the denominator, which can be confusing. Given what one has learned so far, this is the operable definition of Ohm's Law. However, another version is more frequently used later on, and so will also be given here:
[math]\displaystyle{ V = I R }[/math]
where [math]\displaystyle{ V }[/math] is the electric potential, [math]\displaystyle{ I }[/math] is the current, and [math]\displaystyle{ R }[/math] is resistance as defined before.
Computational Method
This topic is largely conceptual and algebraic, so there is relatively little modeling to be done. However, this program is designed to create plots of the relationship between resistance, resistivity, length and cross sectional area.
Code shows the relationship between:
Resistance and length across different fixed points
Resistance and area across different fixed points
Furthermore, this external program provides a good visual demonstration of the relationship (but unfortunately the source code is not accessible).
===Simple=== Example Number 1
A semi conductive material has a resistivity of [math]\displaystyle{ 200 \; \Omega\cdot m }[/math]. What is its conductivity?
Example Number 2
A unknown material is used in the creation of a video game console.
Part A: How would the amount of free electrons in the material affect the conductance of the material?
Part B:Would the materials conductance increase or decrease if you put the material in the freezer as opposed to room temperature?
Middling
Example Number 1 An electric potential of [math]\displaystyle{ 120 V }[/math] is applied to a circular wire of length [math]\displaystyle{ 2 \cdot 10^4 \; m }[/math] and radius [math]\displaystyle{ 0.001 m }[/math]. The current is equal to [math]\displaystyle{ 1.11 \; A }[/math]. Determine the resistivity, and match it to an elemental metal using an appropriate table (such as [7])
Example Number 2