Newton's First Law of Motion

CLAIMED BY VIVEKANAND RAJASEKAR (Fall 2016)

This topic covers Newton's First Law of Motion

The Main Idea

Newton's First law states that an object at rest will stay at rest and an object in motion will stay in motion with the same speed and direction unless acted upon by an unbalanced external force.

Also called the Law of Inertia, the law simply claims that there is a natural tendency of objects to keep on doing what they are doing.

A Mathematical Model

The first law states that if the Net Force acting on the object is zero, then there is no change in the velocity of the object. Velocity is a vector, which has both direction and magnitude, therefore if the Net Force is zero, neither the direction or magnitude can be changing.

This idea can be quantified in the following manner:

[math]\displaystyle{ \sum \mathbf{F} = 0\; \Leftrightarrow\; \frac{\mathrm{d} \mathbf{v} }{\mathrm{d}t} = 0. }[/math]

However, there are two particular instances of the object that this law could apply to:

1) The object is at rest and will stay at rest (Magnitude of velocity = 0) unless a nonzero force acts upon it.

2) The object is in motion (Velocity does not equal zero) and will continue to be in motion with the same velocity, proceeding in the same straight line unless a nonzero force acts upon it.

A Computational Model

Examples

Simple

Let's do some examples and critical thinking similar to the book:

Question 1: In order to move a box with constant speed and direction across a table what do you have to do?

Answer: You would have to push the box the entire time across the table. With the same magnitude and direction of course. But why doesn't it just keep on moving after one push you ask? Well the net force on the box must equal zero for the box to continue moving at the same speed and in the same direction. So with the outside forces acting on the object, you would have to keep pushing to cancel them out and keep the motion of the object constant.

Question 2: Is a change in position an indicator of interaction?

Answer: Sometimes yes and sometimes no. It depends. If the change in position is a result of constant speed and direction of an object then no, it is not an indicator of an unbalanced force. Further data (like velocity at each position) would be needed to decide if an object is experiencing an interaction from an outside force.

Medium

Difficult

Connectedness

This topic is connected to every aspect of life. Every time you get in a car or drop something on the floor or trip over a rock Newton's First Law is demonstrating itself to you. The connections of this topic to the real world is an endless list of possibilities.

Some magicians often have "tricked" their audiences into believing their great powers when in reality, it is nothing more than the skillful manipulation of Newton's First Law. For example, when a magician pulls out a tablecloth from plates on the table and the plates maintain their initial state of rest without any change in their velocities, some people might be fooled into believing in magic. However, any admirer of Newton would know that this is simply a manipulation of Newton's First Law. The object (the plates) were not in motion, and because the tablecloth was pulled out in such a manner that it does not exert a force onto the plates, the plates do not change velocities.

In space, there are small objects that are floating in a straight line. They are far enough from any large objects that no gravitational force exists to effect their motion. So, because there is no external force and the object was moving, it keeps on moving in a straight line indefinitely. Although modern astronomers would argue that the object would eventually come in contact with another object of great size that would exert a significant gravitational force onto this object, other astronomers could argue about the nature of the universe and the possibility that the object could be moving at the edge of the universe where it is moving at the same speed as the expansion of the universe and therefore could indeed move forever without any change in its velocity.

History

This theory was originally discovered by Galileo who conducted experiments on the concepts of inertia and acceleration due to gravity. Galileo studied the movement of balls on smooth and rough surfaces, developing the idea of friction. Isaac Newton further studied these concepts and ideas and presented his 3 Laws of Motion. The first of these 3 laws, as we know, stated that an object in motion will stay in motion with the same speed and direction until an unbalanced force acts on it. And with the absence of friction or other forces, an object will continue moving forever.

From the original Latin of Newton's Principia: Lex I: Corpus omne perseverare in statu suo quiescendi vel movendi uniformiter in directum, nisi quatenus a viribus impressis cogitur statum illum mutare.

Translated to English, this reads: "Law I: Every body persists in its state of being at rest or of moving uniformly straight forward, except insofar as it is compelled to change its state by force impressed."

Aristotle, the Greek who had an opinion on everything, believed that all objects have a natural place. Heavy objects wanted to be at rest on the Earth and light objects like smoke wanted to be at rest in the sky. He even went so far as to hypothesize that stars belonged only in the heavens. He thought that the natural state of objects was at rest and that nothing could keep moving forever without an external force. He did not believe that an object, without any external forces, could keep moving forever.

Galileo, a more enlightened man, believed that although an outside force was needed to change the velocity of an object, no force was necessary to maintain its object. It could keep moving forever if nothing acted on it.

Newton, who formally stated the law in the fancy language of Latin and whose name is attached to the very law, actually did nothing more than simply restate the law of inertia which Galileo had already described. He even gave the appropriate credit to Galileo, but to this day, we refer to this law not as Galileo's First Law, but as Newton's.

Page Created by: Brittney Vidal November 10, 2015 <-- For Credit

Page Edited by: Vivekanand Rajasekar November 27, 2015 <-- For Credit

Interactions

Newton's First Law of Motion

Contents

The Main Idea

A Mathematical Model

A Computational Model

Examples

Simple

Medium

Difficult

Connectedness

History

See Also

Further reading or exploring

External links

References

Navigation menu