Main Page: Difference between revisions
(Process Involved) |
|||
Line 1,431: | Line 1,431: | ||
Mobile electrons flow through a wire due to a parallel electric field inside the wire. This electric field is caused by an energy source such as a battery or power supply. The parallel electric field flows from an area of high potential (i.e. the positive end of the battery) to an area of low potential (i.e. the negative end of the battery). This is the same direction as the conventional current. Since electrons are negatively charged, they flow in the opposite direction of the parallel electric field. This can be summarized by the equation: | Mobile electrons flow through a wire due to a parallel electric field inside the wire. This electric field is caused by an energy source such as a battery or power supply. The parallel electric field flows from an area of high potential (i.e. the positive end of the battery) to an area of low potential (i.e. the negative end of the battery). This is the same direction as the conventional current. Since electrons are negatively charged, they flow in the opposite direction of the parallel electric field. This can be summarized by the equation: | ||
[[File:Electric_force.png]] | |||
== Part 2: Initial Transient State (Magnetic Field Present) == | == Part 2: Initial Transient State (Magnetic Field Present) == |
Revision as of 23:33, 16 April 2016
Welcome to the Georgia Tech Wiki for Introductory Physics. This resource was created so that students can contribute and curate content to help those with limited or no access to a textbook. When reading this website, please correct any errors you may come across. If you read something that isn't clear, please consider revising it for future students!
Looking to make a contribution?
- Pick one of the topics from intro physics listed below
- Add content to that topic or improve the quality of what is already there.
- Need to make a new topic? Edit this page and add it to the list under the appropriate category. Then copy and paste the default Template into your new page and start editing.
Please remember that this is not a textbook and you are not limited to expressing your ideas with only text and equations. Whenever possible embed: pictures, videos, diagrams, simulations, computational models (e.g. Glowscript), and whatever content you think makes learning physics easier for other students.
Source Material
All of the content added to this resource must be in the public domain or similar free resource. If you are unsure about a source, contact the original author for permission. That said, there is a surprisingly large amount of introductory physics content scattered across the web. Here is an incomplete list of intro physics resources (please update as needed).
- A physics resource written by experts for an expert audience Physics Portal
- A wiki written for students by a physics expert MSU Physics Wiki
- A wiki book on modern physics Modern Physics Wiki
- The MIT open courseware for intro physics MITOCW Wiki
- An online concept map of intro physics HyperPhysics
- Interactive physics simulations PhET
- OpenStax algebra based intro physics textbook College Physics
- The Open Source Physics project is a collection of online physics resources OSP
- A resource guide compiled by the AAPT for educators ComPADRE
Organizing Categories
These are the broad, overarching categories, that we cover in three semester of introductory physics. You can add subcategories as needed but a single topic should direct readers to a page in one of these categories.
Resources
- Commonly used wiki commands Wiki Cheatsheet
- A guide to representing equations in math mode Wiki Math Mode
- A page to keep track of all the physics Constants
- A page for review of Vectors and vector operations
- A listing of Notable Scientist with links to their individual pages
Physics 1
Week 1
Student Content
Help with VPython
Interactions
Velocity and Momentum
Expert Content
Week 2
Student Content
Momentum and the Momentum Principle
Iterative Prediction with a Constant Force
Expert Content
- Scalars and Vectors
- Displacement and Velocity
- Modeling Motion with VPython
- Relative Motion
- Graphing Motion
- Momentum
- The Momentum Principle
- Acceleration & The Change in Momentum
- Applying the Momentum Principle
- Constant Force Motion
- Iterative Prediction of Motion
- The Momentum Principle in Multi-particle Systems
- Why Angular Momentum?
- Angular Momentum
- Net Torque & The Angular Momentum Principle
- Angular Momentum Conservation
Week 3
Student Content
Analytic Prediction with a Constant Force
Iterative Prediction with a Varying Force
Expert Content
Week 4
Student Content
Fundamental Interactions
Expert Content
Week 5
Student Content
Conservation of Momentum
Properties of Matter
Expert Content
Week 6
Student Content
Identifying Forces
Expert Content
Week 7
Student Content
Energy Principle
Expert Content
Week 8
Student Content
Work by Non-Constant Forces
Potential Energy
Expert Content
- Work Done by Non-Constant Forces
- Potential Energy
- (Near Earth) Gravitational and Spring Potential Energy
- Changes of Rest Mass Energy
- Force and Potential Energy
- Newtonian Gravitational Potential Energy
- Graphing Energy for Gravitationally Interacting Systems
- Spring Potential Energy
- Power: The Rate of Energy Change
- Dissipation of Energy
Week 9
Student Content
Multiparticle Systems
Expert Content
Week 10
Student Content
Choice of System
Thermal Energy, Dissipation and Transfer of Energy
Rotational and Vibrational Energy
Expert Content
Week 11
Student Content
Different Models of a System
Models of Friction
Expert Content
Week 12
Student Content
Collisions
Expert Content
Week 13
Student Content
Rotations
Angular Momentum
- Total Angular Momentum
- Translational Angular Momentum
- Rotational Angular Momentum
- The Angular Momentum Principle
- Angular Momentum Compared to Linear Momentum
- Angular Impulse
- Predicting the Position of a Rotating System
- Angular Momentum of Multiparticle Systems
- The Moments of Inertia
- Moment of Inertia for a cylinder
- Right Hand Rule
Expert Content
Week 14
Student Content
Analyzing Motion with and without Torque
Expert Content
Week 15
Student Content
Introduction to Quantum Concepts
Expert Content
Physics 2
Week 1
CLAIMED BY DIPRO CHAKRABORTY
CLAIMED BY DIPRO CHAKRABORTY CLAIMED BY DIPRO CHAKRABORTY CLAIMED BY DIPRO CHAKRABORTY
CLAIMED BY DIPRO CHAKRABORTY
Electric field
The electric field created by a charge is present throughout space at all times, whether or not there is another charge around to feel its effects. The electric field created by a charge penetrates through matter. The field permeates the neighboring space, biding its time until it can affect anything brought into its space of interaction.
The Main Idea
To be exact, the definition of the Electric Field is as follows:
The electric field is a region around a charged particle or object within which a force would be exerted on other objects.
If we put a charged particle at a location and it experiences a force, it would be logical to assume that there is something present that is interacting with the particle. This "virtual force" is in essence the electric field.
A Mathematical Model
The electric field can be expressed mathematically as follows:
[math]\displaystyle{ {\vec{F_{net}} = 0 \Leftrightarrow \frac{d\vec{v}}{dt}} = 0 }[/math]
[math]\displaystyle{ {\vec{F_{2}} = {q_{1}}{\vec{E_{1}}} \Leftrightarrow \frac{d\vec{v}}{dt}} }[/math]
which can be translated to postulate that the force on particle 2 is determined by the charge of particle 2 and the electric field.
Examples
The following examples are to test your basic understanding of the Electric Field. For more examples that test your knowledge of all three of the laws, peruse the class textbook.
Simple
Which way is the electric field going for a negatively charged particle?
It's easy to see that the electric field is pointing toward the negatively charged particle. The electric field is tending toward the negatively charged particle.
Middling
Does the object in the following image have a net force of zero? Does it have a constant velocity?
This example is slightly more difficult, but is still quite trivial. If we sum the forces in the x direction, we see that the net force is 2 newtons in the -x direction. Therefore, the object does not have a constant velocity, and will be accelerating in the -x direction.
Difficult
Does the object in the following image have a net force of zero? Does it have a constant velocity?
This final example tests your knowledge and understanding of Newton's First Law. We're able to see that the box will accelerate in the -x direction because the net force in the x direction is 5 newtons to the left. However, the box itself has a velocity of 5m/s upwards, which would indeed stay constant. This is because forces (and motion) in perpendicular directions are of each other.
Connectedness
Newton's laws of motion tie into almost everything that we see or do. The first law, in particular, explains why we suddenly lurch forward when a car suddenly stops (our bodies are in a state of motion and thus resist the sudden stop), why it's much harder to stop when ice skating than walking (there's less friction, thus less net force to decelerate), and much, much, more. The importance of Newton's first law (and by extension, the other laws of motion) is not readily apparent, but serves as a basis to explain much of our daily interactions with our surroundings.
It can also apply to things outside of our daily interactions - space, for example. Newton's first law describes why an astronaut in space will continuously float in a direction forever if they are not pulled in by an asteroid or a planet's gravitational force. There is a lack of a net force opposing the astronaut's motion (due to the fact that there is no air in space) which results in the astronaut having a constant velocity. Floating off into space is probably an astronaut's worst nightmare, a scenario that a recent movie, Gravity, explored. The entire premise of the movie (Sandra Bullock becomes untethered from her space station) relies on Newton's first law of motion.
History
While Galileo is the one credited with the idea of inertia motion, it was René Descartes, a French philosopher, who would expand upon Galileo's ideas. Descartes went on to propose three fundamental laws of nature in his book, Principles of Philosophy, the first of which stated that "each thing, as far as is in its power, always remains in the same state; and that consequently, when it is once moved, it always continues to move." Thus, while the concept of inertia is often referred to as Newton's First Law, it was first described by Galileo and then perfected by Descartes decades before Newton published his findings.
As for Newton, he first described his three laws of motion in The Mathematical Principle of Natural Philosophy, for the Principia, which was published in 1687. These laws described the relationship between an object and the forces acting upon it and laid the foundation for classical mechanics. While Newton's first law came from the work of Descartes and Galileo, his other laws are the work of himself.
The Main Idea
To be exact, the definition of the Electric Field is as follows:
The electric field is a region around a charged particle or object within which a force would be exerted on other objects.
If we put a charged particle at a location and it experiences a force, it would be logical to assume that there is something present that is interacting with the particle. This "virtual force" is in essence the electric field.
A Mathematical Model
The electric field can be expressed mathematically as follows:
[math]\displaystyle{ {\vec{F_{net}} = 0 \Leftrightarrow \frac{d\vec{v}}{dt}} = 0 }[/math]
[math]\displaystyle{ {\vec{F_{2}} = {q_{1}}{\vec{E_{1}}} \Leftrightarrow \frac{d\vec{v}}{dt}} }[/math]
which can be translated to postulate that the force on particle 2 is determined by the charge of particle 2 and the electric field.
Examples
The following examples are to test your basic understanding of the Electric Field. For more examples that test your knowledge of all three of the laws, peruse the class textbook.
Simple
Which way is the electric field going for a negatively charged particle?
It's easy to see that the electric field is pointing toward the negatively charged particle. The electric field is tending toward the negatively charged particle.
Middling
Does the object in the following image have a net force of zero? Does it have a constant velocity?
This example is slightly more difficult, but is still quite trivial. If we sum the forces in the x direction, we see that the net force is 2 newtons in the -x direction. Therefore, the object does not have a constant velocity, and will be accelerating in the -x direction.
Difficult
Does the object in the following image have a net force of zero? Does it have a constant velocity?
This final example tests your knowledge and understanding of Newton's First Law. We're able to see that the box will accelerate in the -x direction because the net force in the x direction is 5 newtons to the left. However, the box itself has a velocity of 5m/s upwards, which would indeed stay constant. This is because forces (and motion) in perpendicular directions are of each other.
Connectedness
Newton's laws of motion tie into almost everything that we see or do. The first law, in particular, explains why we suddenly lurch forward when a car suddenly stops (our bodies are in a state of motion and thus resist the sudden stop), why it's much harder to stop when ice skating than walking (there's less friction, thus less net force to decelerate), and much, much, more. The importance of Newton's first law (and by extension, the other laws of motion) is not readily apparent, but serves as a basis to explain much of our daily interactions with our surroundings.
It can also apply to things outside of our daily interactions - space, for example. Newton's first law describes why an astronaut in space will continuously float in a direction forever if they are not pulled in by an asteroid or a planet's gravitational force. There is a lack of a net force opposing the astronaut's motion (due to the fact that there is no air in space) which results in the astronaut having a constant velocity. Floating off into space is probably an astronaut's worst nightmare, a scenario that a recent movie, Gravity, explored. The entire premise of the movie (Sandra Bullock becomes untethered from her space station) relies on Newton's first law of motion.
History
While Galileo is the one credited with the idea of inertia motion, it was René Descartes, a French philosopher, who would expand upon Galileo's ideas. Descartes went on to propose three fundamental laws of nature in his book, Principles of Philosophy, the first of which stated that "each thing, as far as is in its power, always remains in the same state; and that consequently, when it is once moved, it always continues to move." Thus, while the concept of inertia is often referred to as Newton's First Law, it was first described by Galileo and then perfected by Descartes decades before Newton published his findings.
As for Newton, he first described his three laws of motion in The Mathematical Principle of Natural Philosophy, for the Principia, which was published in 1687. These laws described the relationship between an object and the forces acting upon it and laid the foundation for classical mechanics. While Newton's first law came from the work of Descartes and Galileo, his other laws are the work of himself.
The Main Idea
To be exact, the definition of the Electric Field is as follows:
The electric field is a region around a charged particle or object within which a force would be exerted on other objects.
If we put a charged particle at a location and it experiences a force, it would be logical to assume that there is something present that is interacting with the particle. This "virtual force" is in essence the electric field.
A Mathematical Model
The electric field can be expressed mathematically as follows:
[math]\displaystyle{ {\vec{F_{net}} = 0 \Leftrightarrow \frac{d\vec{v}}{dt}} = 0 }[/math]
[math]\displaystyle{ {\vec{F_{2}} = {q_{1}}{\vec{E_{1}}} \Leftrightarrow \frac{d\vec{v}}{dt}} }[/math]
which can be translated to postulate that the force on particle 2 is determined by the charge of particle 2 and the electric field.
Examples
The following examples are to test your basic understanding of the Electric Field. For more examples that test your knowledge of all three of the laws, peruse the class textbook.
Simple
Which way is the electric field going for a negatively charged particle?
It's easy to see that the electric field is pointing toward the negatively charged particle. The electric field is tending toward the negatively charged particle.
Middling
Does the object in the following image have a net force of zero? Does it have a constant velocity?
This example is slightly more difficult, but is still quite trivial. If we sum the forces in the x direction, we see that the net force is 2 newtons in the -x direction. Therefore, the object does not have a constant velocity, and will be accelerating in the -x direction.
Difficult
Does the object in the following image have a net force of zero? Does it have a constant velocity?
This final example tests your knowledge and understanding of Newton's First Law. We're able to see that the box will accelerate in the -x direction because the net force in the x direction is 5 newtons to the left. However, the box itself has a velocity of 5m/s upwards, which would indeed stay constant. This is because forces (and motion) in perpendicular directions are of each other.
Connectedness
Newton's laws of motion tie into almost everything that we see or do. The first law, in particular, explains why we suddenly lurch forward when a car suddenly stops (our bodies are in a state of motion and thus resist the sudden stop), why it's much harder to stop when ice skating than walking (there's less friction, thus less net force to decelerate), and much, much, more. The importance of Newton's first law (and by extension, the other laws of motion) is not readily apparent, but serves as a basis to explain much of our daily interactions with our surroundings.
It can also apply to things outside of our daily interactions - space, for example. Newton's first law describes why an astronaut in space will continuously float in a direction forever if they are not pulled in by an asteroid or a planet's gravitational force. There is a lack of a net force opposing the astronaut's motion (due to the fact that there is no air in space) which results in the astronaut having a constant velocity. Floating off into space is probably an astronaut's worst nightmare, a scenario that a recent movie, Gravity, explored. The entire premise of the movie (Sandra Bullock becomes untethered from her space station) relies on Newton's first law of motion.
History
While Galileo is the one credited with the idea of inertia motion, it was René Descartes, a French philosopher, who would expand upon Galileo's ideas. Descartes went on to propose three fundamental laws of nature in his book, Principles of Philosophy, the first of which stated that "each thing, as far as is in its power, always remains in the same state; and that consequently, when it is once moved, it always continues to move." Thus, while the concept of inertia is often referred to as Newton's First Law, it was first described by Galileo and then perfected by Descartes decades before Newton published his findings.
As for Newton, he first described his three laws of motion in The Mathematical Principle of Natural Philosophy, for the Principia, which was published in 1687. These laws described the relationship between an object and the forces acting upon it and laid the foundation for classical mechanics. While Newton's first law came from the work of Descartes and Galileo, his other laws are the work of himself.
The Main Idea
To be exact, the definition of the Electric Field is as follows:
The electric field is a region around a charged particle or object within which a force would be exerted on other objects.
If we put a charged particle at a location and it experiences a force, it would be logical to assume that there is something present that is interacting with the particle. This "virtual force" is in essence the electric field.
A Mathematical Model
The electric field can be expressed mathematically as follows:
[math]\displaystyle{ {\vec{F_{net}} = 0 \Leftrightarrow \frac{d\vec{v}}{dt}} = 0 }[/math]
[math]\displaystyle{ {\vec{F_{2}} = {q_{1}}{\vec{E_{1}}} \Leftrightarrow \frac{d\vec{v}}{dt}} }[/math]
which can be translated to postulate that the force on particle 2 is determined by the charge of particle 2 and the electric field.
Examples
The following examples are to test your basic understanding of the Electric Field. For more examples that test your knowledge of all three of the laws, peruse the class textbook.
Simple
Which way is the electric field going for a negatively charged particle?
It's easy to see that the electric field is pointing toward the negatively charged particle. The electric field is tending toward the negatively charged particle.
Middling
Does the object in the following image have a net force of zero? Does it have a constant velocity?
This example is slightly more difficult, but is still quite trivial. If we sum the forces in the x direction, we see that the net force is 2 newtons in the -x direction. Therefore, the object does not have a constant velocity, and will be accelerating in the -x direction.
Difficult
Does the object in the following image have a net force of zero? Does it have a constant velocity?
This final example tests your knowledge and understanding of Newton's First Law. We're able to see that the box will accelerate in the -x direction because the net force in the x direction is 5 newtons to the left. However, the box itself has a velocity of 5m/s upwards, which would indeed stay constant. This is because forces (and motion) in perpendicular directions are of each other.
Connectedness
Newton's laws of motion tie into almost everything that we see or do. The first law, in particular, explains why we suddenly lurch forward when a car suddenly stops (our bodies are in a state of motion and thus resist the sudden stop), why it's much harder to stop when ice skating than walking (there's less friction, thus less net force to decelerate), and much, much, more. The importance of Newton's first law (and by extension, the other laws of motion) is not readily apparent, but serves as a basis to explain much of our daily interactions with our surroundings.
It can also apply to things outside of our daily interactions - space, for example. Newton's first law describes why an astronaut in space will continuously float in a direction forever if they are not pulled in by an asteroid or a planet's gravitational force. There is a lack of a net force opposing the astronaut's motion (due to the fact that there is no air in space) which results in the astronaut having a constant velocity. Floating off into space is probably an astronaut's worst nightmare, a scenario that a recent movie, Gravity, explored. The entire premise of the movie (Sandra Bullock becomes untethered from her space station) relies on Newton's first law of motion.
History
While Galileo is the one credited with the idea of inertia motion, it was René Descartes, a French philosopher, who would expand upon Galileo's ideas. Descartes went on to propose three fundamental laws of nature in his book, Principles of Philosophy, the first of which stated that "each thing, as far as is in its power, always remains in the same state; and that consequently, when it is once moved, it always continues to move." Thus, while the concept of inertia is often referred to as Newton's First Law, it was first described by Galileo and then perfected by Descartes decades before Newton published his findings.
As for Newton, he first described his three laws of motion in The Mathematical Principle of Natural Philosophy, for the Principia, which was published in 1687. These laws described the relationship between an object and the forces acting upon it and laid the foundation for classical mechanics. While Newton's first law came from the work of Descartes and Galileo, his other laws are the work of himself.
The Main Idea
To be exact, the definition of the Electric Field is as follows:
The electric field is a region around a charged particle or object within which a force would be exerted on other objects.
If we put a charged particle at a location and it experiences a force, it would be logical to assume that there is something present that is interacting with the particle. This "virtual force" is in essence the electric field.
A Mathematical Model
The electric field can be expressed mathematically as follows:
[math]\displaystyle{ {\vec{F_{net}} = 0 \Leftrightarrow \frac{d\vec{v}}{dt}} = 0 }[/math]
[math]\displaystyle{ {\vec{F_{2}} = {q_{1}}{\vec{E_{1}}} \Leftrightarrow \frac{d\vec{v}}{dt}} = 0 }[/math]
which can be translated to postulate that the force on particle 2 is determined by the charge of particle 2 and the electric field.
Examples
The following examples are to test your basic understanding of the Electric Field. For more examples that test your knowledge of all three of the laws, peruse the class textbook.
Simple
Which way is the electric field going for a negatively charged particle?
It's easy to see that the electric field is pointing toward the negatively charged particle. The electric field is tending toward the negatively charged particle.
Middling
Does the object in the following image have a net force of zero? Does it have a constant velocity?
This example is slightly more difficult, but is still quite trivial. If we sum the forces in the x direction, we see that the net force is 2 newtons in the -x direction. Therefore, the object does not have a constant velocity, and will be accelerating in the -x direction.
Difficult
Does the object in the following image have a net force of zero? Does it have a constant velocity?
This final example tests your knowledge and understanding of Newton's First Law. We're able to see that the box will accelerate in the -x direction because the net force in the x direction is 5 newtons to the left. However, the box itself has a velocity of 5m/s upwards, which would indeed stay constant. This is because forces (and motion) in perpendicular directions are of each other.
Connectedness
Newton's laws of motion tie into almost everything that we see or do. The first law, in particular, explains why we suddenly lurch forward when a car suddenly stops (our bodies are in a state of motion and thus resist the sudden stop), why it's much harder to stop when ice skating than walking (there's less friction, thus less net force to decelerate), and much, much, more. The importance of Newton's first law (and by extension, the other laws of motion) is not readily apparent, but serves as a basis to explain much of our daily interactions with our surroundings.
It can also apply to things outside of our daily interactions - space, for example. Newton's first law describes why an astronaut in space will continuously float in a direction forever if they are not pulled in by an asteroid or a planet's gravitational force. There is a lack of a net force opposing the astronaut's motion (due to the fact that there is no air in space) which results in the astronaut having a constant velocity. Floating off into space is probably an astronaut's worst nightmare, a scenario that a recent movie, Gravity, explored. The entire premise of the movie (Sandra Bullock becomes untethered from her space station) relies on Newton's first law of motion.
History
While Galileo is the one credited with the idea of inertia motion, it was René Descartes, a French philosopher, who would expand upon Galileo's ideas. Descartes went on to propose three fundamental laws of nature in his book, Principles of Philosophy, the first of which stated that "each thing, as far as is in its power, always remains in the same state; and that consequently, when it is once moved, it always continues to move." Thus, while the concept of inertia is often referred to as Newton's First Law, it was first described by Galileo and then perfected by Descartes decades before Newton published his findings.
As for Newton, he first described his three laws of motion in The Mathematical Principle of Natural Philosophy, for the Principia, which was published in 1687. These laws described the relationship between an object and the forces acting upon it and laid the foundation for classical mechanics. While Newton's first law came from the work of Descartes and Galileo, his other laws are the work of himself.
The Main Idea
To be exact, the definition of the Electric Field is as follows:
The electric field is a region around a charged particle or object within which a force would be exerted on other charged particles or objects.
If we put a charged particle at a location and it experiences a force, it would be logical to assume that there is something present that is interacting with the particle. This "virtual force" is in essence the electric field.
A Mathematical Model
The electric field can be expressed mathematically as follows:
[math]\displaystyle{ {\vec{F_{net}} = 0 \Leftrightarrow \frac{d\vec{v}}{dt}} = 0 }[/math]
[math]\displaystyle{ {\vec{F_{2}} = {q_{1}}{\vec{E_{1}}} \Leftrightarrow \frac{d\vec{v}}{dt}} = 0 }[/math]
which can be translated to postulate that the force on particle 2 is determined by the charge of particle 2 and the electric field.
Examples
The following examples are to test your basic understanding of Newton's First Law. For more examples that test your knowledge of all three of the laws, click .
Simple
Does the object in the following image have a net force of zero? Does it have a constant velocity?
It's easy to see that the only force on the object is acting in the +x direction, with a magnitude of 5 newtons. Therefore, the object does not have a net force of zero or a constant velocity. It will be accelerating in the +x direction.
Middling
Does the object in the following image have a net force of zero? Does it have a constant velocity?
This example is slightly more difficult, but is still quite trivial. If we sum the forces in the x direction, we see that the net force is 2 newtons in the -x direction. Therefore, the object does not have a constant velocity, and will be accelerating in the -x direction.
Difficult
Does the object in the following image have a net force of zero? Does it have a constant velocity?
This final example tests your knowledge and understanding of Newton's First Law. We're able to see that the box will accelerate in the -x direction because the net force in the x direction is 5 newtons to the left. However, the box itself has a velocity of 5m/s upwards, which would indeed stay constant. This is because forces (and motion) in perpendicular directions are of each other.
Connectedness
Newton's laws of motion tie into almost everything that we see or do. The first law, in particular, explains why we suddenly lurch forward when a car suddenly stops (our bodies are in a state of motion and thus resist the sudden stop), why it's much harder to stop when ice skating than walking (there's less friction, thus less net force to decelerate), and much, much, more. The importance of Newton's first law (and by extension, the other laws of motion) is not readily apparent, but serves as a basis to explain much of our daily interactions with our surroundings.
It can also apply to things outside of our daily interactions - space, for example. Newton's first law describes why an astronaut in space will continuously float in a direction forever if they are not pulled in by an asteroid or a planet's gravitational force. There is a lack of a net force opposing the astronaut's motion (due to the fact that there is no air in space) which results in the astronaut having a constant velocity. Floating off into space is probably an astronaut's worst nightmare, a scenario that a recent movie, Gravity, explored. The entire premise of the movie (Sandra Bullock becomes untethered from her space station) relies on Newton's first law of motion.
History
While Galileo is the one credited with the idea of inertia motion, it was René Descartes, a French philosopher, who would expand upon Galileo's ideas. Descartes went on to propose three fundamental laws of nature in his book, Principles of Philosophy, the first of which stated that "each thing, as far as is in its power, always remains in the same state; and that consequently, when it is once moved, it always continues to move." Thus, while the concept of inertia is often referred to as Newton's First Law, it was first described by Galileo and then perfected by Descartes decades before Newton published his findings.
As for Newton, he first described his three laws of motion in The Mathematical Principle of Natural Philosophy, for the Principia, which was published in 1687. These laws described the relationship between an object and the forces acting upon it and laid the foundation for classical mechanics. While Newton's first law came from the work of Descartes and Galileo, his other laws are the work of himself.
The Main Idea
To be exact, the definition of the First Law of Motion is as follows:
The electric field is a region around a charged particle or object within which a force would be exerted on other charged particles or objects.
In other (and much simpler) terms, it means that an object at rest stays at rest and an object in in motion stays in motion at a constant velocity unless acted on by an unbalanced net force. It's important to keep in mind that only a difference in affect the velocity of an object. The amount of change in velocity is determined by
A Mathematical Model
Newton's first law can be stated mathematically as follows:
[math]\displaystyle{ {\vec{F_{net}} = 0 \Leftrightarrow \frac{d\vec{v}}{dt}} = 0 }[/math]
Where...
[math]\displaystyle{ \vec{F_{net}} }[/math] is the net force from the surroundings.
[math]\displaystyle{ d\vec{v} }[/math] is the change in velocity of the system.
[math]\displaystyle{ dt }[/math] is the change in time of the system
If we trace this formula from the left to the right, we can see that if the net force on an object is zero, then the change in velocity of an object is also zero. Conversely, if we were given an object and told that its change in momentum is zero, then we can deduce that the net force acting on the object is also zero. Keep in mind, however, that this formula simple deals with the change in velocity. It does not mean that the object is at rest, only that its velocity remains constant.
Examples
The following examples are to test your basic understanding of Newton's First Law. For more examples that test your knowledge of all three of the laws, click .
Simple
Does the object in the following image have a net force of zero? Does it have a constant velocity?
It's easy to see that the only force on the object is acting in the +x direction, with a magnitude of 5 newtons. Therefore, the object does not have a net force of zero or a constant velocity. It will be accelerating in the +x direction.
Middling
Does the object in the following image have a net force of zero? Does it have a constant velocity?
This example is slightly more difficult, but is still quite trivial. If we sum the forces in the x direction, we see that the net force is 2 newtons in the -x direction. Therefore, the object does not have a constant velocity, and will be accelerating in the -x direction.
Difficult
Does the object in the following image have a net force of zero? Does it have a constant velocity?
This final example tests your knowledge and understanding of Newton's First Law. We're able to see that the box will accelerate in the -x direction because the net force in the x direction is 5 newtons to the left. However, the box itself has a velocity of 5m/s upwards, which would indeed stay constant. This is because forces (and motion) in perpendicular directions are of each other.
Connectedness
Newton's laws of motion tie into almost everything that we see or do. The first law, in particular, explains why we suddenly lurch forward when a car suddenly stops (our bodies are in a state of motion and thus resist the sudden stop), why it's much harder to stop when ice skating than walking (there's less friction, thus less net force to decelerate), and much, much, more. The importance of Newton's first law (and by extension, the other laws of motion) is not readily apparent, but serves as a basis to explain much of our daily interactions with our surroundings.
It can also apply to things outside of our daily interactions - space, for example. Newton's first law describes why an astronaut in space will continuously float in a direction forever if they are not pulled in by an asteroid or a planet's gravitational force. There is a lack of a net force opposing the astronaut's motion (due to the fact that there is no air in space) which results in the astronaut having a constant velocity. Floating off into space is probably an astronaut's worst nightmare, a scenario that a recent movie, Gravity, explored. The entire premise of the movie (Sandra Bullock becomes untethered from her space station) relies on Newton's first law of motion.
History
While Galileo is the one credited with the idea of inertia motion, it was René Descartes, a French philosopher, who would expand upon Galileo's ideas. Descartes went on to propose three fundamental laws of nature in his book, Principles of Philosophy, the first of which stated that "each thing, as far as is in its power, always remains in the same state; and that consequently, when it is once moved, it always continues to move." Thus, while the concept of inertia is often referred to as Newton's First Law, it was first described by Galileo and then perfected by Descartes decades before Newton published his findings.
As for Newton, he first described his three laws of motion in The Mathematical Principle of Natural Philosophy, for the Principia, which was published in 1687. These laws described the relationship between an object and the forces acting upon it and laid the foundation for classical mechanics. While Newton's first law came from the work of Descartes and Galileo, his other laws are the work of himself.
The Main Idea
To be exact, the definition of the First Law of Motion is as follows:
The electric field is a region around a charged particle or object within which a force would be exerted on other charged particles or objects.
In other (and much simpler) terms, it means that an object at rest stays at rest and an object in in motion stays in motion at a constant velocity unless acted on by an unbalanced net force. It's important to keep in mind that only a difference in affect the velocity of an object. The amount of change in velocity is determined by
A Mathematical Model
Newton's first law can be stated mathematically as follows:
[math]\displaystyle{ {\vec{F_{net}} = 0 \Leftrightarrow \frac{d\vec{v}}{dt}} = 0 }[/math]
Where...
[math]\displaystyle{ \vec{F_{net}} }[/math] is the net force from the surroundings.
[math]\displaystyle{ d\vec{v} }[/math] is the change in velocity of the system.
[math]\displaystyle{ dt }[/math] is the change in time of the system
If we trace this formula from the left to the right, we can see that if the net force on an object is zero, then the change in velocity of an object is also zero. Conversely, if we were given an object and told that its change in momentum is zero, then we can deduce that the net force acting on the object is also zero. Keep in mind, however, that this formula simple deals with the change in velocity. It does not mean that the object is at rest, only that its velocity remains constant.
Examples
The following examples are to test your basic understanding of Newton's First Law. For more examples that test your knowledge of all three of the laws, click .
Simple
Does the object in the following image have a net force of zero? Does it have a constant velocity?
It's easy to see that the only force on the object is acting in the +x direction, with a magnitude of 5 newtons. Therefore, the object does not have a net force of zero or a constant velocity. It will be accelerating in the +x direction.
Middling
Does the object in the following image have a net force of zero? Does it have a constant velocity?
This example is slightly more difficult, but is still quite trivial. If we sum the forces in the x direction, we see that the net force is 2 newtons in the -x direction. Therefore, the object does not have a constant velocity, and will be accelerating in the -x direction.
Difficult
Does the object in the following image have a net force of zero? Does it have a constant velocity?
This final example tests your knowledge and understanding of Newton's First Law. We're able to see that the box will accelerate in the -x direction because the net force in the x direction is 5 newtons to the left. However, the box itself has a velocity of 5m/s upwards, which would indeed stay constant. This is because forces (and motion) in perpendicular directions are of each other.
Connectedness
Newton's laws of motion tie into almost everything that we see or do. The first law, in particular, explains why we suddenly lurch forward when a car suddenly stops (our bodies are in a state of motion and thus resist the sudden stop), why it's much harder to stop when ice skating than walking (there's less friction, thus less net force to decelerate), and much, much, more. The importance of Newton's first law (and by extension, the other laws of motion) is not readily apparent, but serves as a basis to explain much of our daily interactions with our surroundings.
It can also apply to things outside of our daily interactions - space, for example. Newton's first law describes why an astronaut in space will continuously float in a direction forever if they are not pulled in by an asteroid or a planet's gravitational force. There is a lack of a net force opposing the astronaut's motion (due to the fact that there is no air in space) which results in the astronaut having a constant velocity. Floating off into space is probably an astronaut's worst nightmare, a scenario that a recent movie, Gravity, explored. The entire premise of the movie (Sandra Bullock becomes untethered from her space station) relies on Newton's first law of motion.
History
While Galileo is the one credited with the idea of inertia motion, it was René Descartes, a French philosopher, who would expand upon Galileo's ideas. Descartes went on to propose three fundamental laws of nature in his book, Principles of Philosophy, the first of which stated that "each thing, as far as is in its power, always remains in the same state; and that consequently, when it is once moved, it always continues to move." Thus, while the concept of inertia is often referred to as Newton's First Law, it was first described by Galileo and then perfected by Descartes decades before Newton published his findings.
As for Newton, he first described his three laws of motion in The Mathematical Principle of Natural Philosophy, for the Principia, which was published in 1687. These laws described the relationship between an object and the forces acting upon it and laid the foundation for classical mechanics. While Newton's first law came from the work of Descartes and Galileo, his other laws are the work of himself.
The Main Idea
To be exact, the definition of the First Law of Motion is as follows:
Every body persists in its state of rest or of moving with constant speed in a constant direction, except to the extent that it is compelled to change that state by forces acting on it.
In other (and much simpler) terms, it means that an object at rest stays at rest and an object in in motion stays in motion at a constant velocity unless acted on by an unbalanced net force. It's important to keep in mind that only a difference in net force can affect the velocity of an object. The amount of change in velocity is determined by Newton's Second Law of Motion.
A Mathematical Model
Newton's first law can be stated mathematically as follows:
[math]\displaystyle{ {\vec{F_{net}} = 0 \Leftrightarrow \frac{d\vec{v}}{dt}} = 0 }[/math]
Where...
[math]\displaystyle{ \vec{F_{net}} }[/math] is the net force from the surroundings.
[math]\displaystyle{ d\vec{v} }[/math] is the change in velocity of the system.
[math]\displaystyle{ dt }[/math] is the change in time of the system
If we trace this formula from the left to the right, we can see that if the net force on an object is zero, then the change in velocity of an object is also zero. Conversely, if we were given an object and told that its change in momentum is zero, then we can deduce that the net force acting on the object is also zero. Keep in mind, however, that this formula simple deals with the change in velocity. It does not mean that the object is at rest, only that its velocity remains constant.
Examples
The following examples are to test your basic understanding of Newton's First Law. For more examples that test your knowledge of all three of the laws, click here.
Simple
Does the object in the following image have a net force of zero? Does it have a constant velocity?
It's easy to see that the only force on the object is acting in the +x direction, with a magnitude of 5 newtons. Therefore, the object does not have a net force of zero or a constant velocity. It will be accelerating in the +x direction.
Middling
Does the object in the following image have a net force of zero? Does it have a constant velocity?
This example is slightly more difficult, but is still quite trivial. If we sum the forces in the x direction, we see that the net force is 2 newtons in the -x direction. Therefore, the object does not have a constant velocity, and will be accelerating in the -x direction.
Difficult
Does the object in the following image have a net force of zero? Does it have a constant velocity?
This final example tests your knowledge and understanding of Newton's First Law. We're able to see that the box will accelerate in the -x direction because the net force in the x direction is 5 newtons to the left. However, the box itself has a velocity of 5m/s upwards, which would indeed stay constant. This is because forces (and motion) in perpendicular directions are independent of each other.
Connectedness
Newton's laws of motion tie into almost everything that we see or do. The first law, in particular, explains why we suddenly lurch forward when a car suddenly stops (our bodies are in a state of motion and thus resist the sudden stop), why it's much harder to stop when ice skating than walking (there's less friction, thus less net force to decelerate), and much, much, more. The importance of Newton's first law (and by extension, the other laws of motion) is not readily apparent, but serves as a basis to explain much of our daily interactions with our surroundings.
It can also apply to things outside of our daily interactions - space, for example. Newton's first law describes why an astronaut in space will continuously float in a direction forever if they are not pulled in by an asteroid or a planet's gravitational force. There is a lack of a net force opposing the astronaut's motion (due to the fact that there is no air in space) which results in the astronaut having a constant velocity. Floating off into space is probably an astronaut's worst nightmare, a scenario that a recent movie, Gravity, explored. The entire premise of the movie (Sandra Bullock becomes untethered from her space station) relies on Newton's first law of motion.
History
While Galileo is the one credited with the idea of inertia motion, it was René Descartes, a French philosopher, who would expand upon Galileo's ideas. Descartes went on to propose three fundamental laws of nature in his book, Principles of Philosophy, the first of which stated that "each thing, as far as is in its power, always remains in the same state; and that consequently, when it is once moved, it always continues to move." Thus, while the concept of inertia is often referred to as Newton's First Law, it was first described by Galileo and then perfected by Descartes decades before Newton published his findings.
As for Newton, he first described his three laws of motion in The Mathematical Principle of Natural Philosophy, for the Principia, which was published in 1687. These laws described the relationship between an object and the forces acting upon it and laid the foundation for classical mechanics. While Newton's first law came from the work of Descartes and Galileo, his other laws are the work of himself.
Electric Field
The electric field created by a charge is present throughout space at all times, whether or not there is another charge around to feel its effects. The electric field created by a charge penetrates through matter. The field permeates the neighboring space, biding its time until it can affect anything brought into its space of interaction.
Electric force
- Electric Force Claimed by Amarachi Eze
- Lorentz Force
Bold text====Superposition====
Dipoles
Week 2
Interactions of charged objects
Tape experiments
Polarization
Week 3
Insulators
Conductors
Charging and discharging
Week 4
Field of a charged rod
Field of a charged ring/disk/capacitor
Field of a charged sphere
Week 5
Potential energy
Electric potential
Sign of a potential difference
Claimed by Tyler Quill
Potential at a single location
Path independence and round trip potential
Week 6
Electric field and potential in an insulator
Moving charges in a magnetic field
Biot-Savart Law
Moving charges, electron current, and conventional current
Week 7
Magnetic field of a wire
Magnetic field of a current-carrying loop
Magnetic dipoles
Atomic structure of magnets
Week 8
Steady state current
Node rule
Electric fields and energy in circuits
- Series circuit claimed by Hannah Jang
- Node Rule
- Loop Rule
- Electric Potential Difference
Macroscopic analysis of circuits
Week 9
Electric field and potential in circuits with capacitors
Magnetic forces on charges and currents
Electric and magnetic forces
Velocity selector
Week 10
Hall Effect
The Hall effect is a phenomenon that describes why charged particles collect to one side of a conductor in the presence of a magnetic field. It is used to determine the charge of a mobile particle inside a conductor.
Main Idea
The Hall Effect is a phenomenon that is created when charged particles moving through a conductor are submitted to a magnetic field. The magnetic field pushes the charged particles to one side of the conductor. This causes a buildup of charges on one side of the conductor which creates a polarization of the conductor perpendicular to the current flow. Eventually this charge will stabilize as the mobile charges will resist the magnetic field.
Part 1: Normal circuit (No Magnetic Field Yet)
(For simplicity, the mobile charges have already been determined to be negatively charged electrons. This will not always be the case and it should not be assumed that the mobile charges are electrons)
Mobile electrons flow through a wire due to a parallel electric field inside the wire. This electric field is caused by an energy source such as a battery or power supply. The parallel electric field flows from an area of high potential (i.e. the positive end of the battery) to an area of low potential (i.e. the negative end of the battery). This is the same direction as the conventional current. Since electrons are negatively charged, they flow in the opposite direction of the parallel electric field. This can be summarized by the equation:
Part 2: Initial Transient State (Magnetic Field Present)
A Computational Model
How do we visualize or predict using this topic. Consider embedding some vpython code here Teach hands-on with GlowScript
Examples
Be sure to show all steps in your solution and include diagrams whenever possible
Simple
Middling
Difficult
Connectedness
- How is this topic connected to something that you are interested in?
- How is it connected to your major?
- Is there an interesting industrial application?
History
Put this idea in historical context. Give the reader the Who, What, When, Where, and Why.
See also
Are there related topics or categories in this wiki resource for the curious reader to explore? How does this topic fit into that context?
Further reading
Books, Articles or other print media on this topic
External links
Internet resources on this topic
References
This section contains the the references you used while writing this page